Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 29

The Kinsey Institute Exposed:

A Warning to Parents & Governments

Throughout the World

The Kinsey Institute Exposed:

A Warning to Parents & Governments
Throughout the World

On April 23, 2014 the Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction was granted special consultative status with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations (ECOSOC). This decision was based in
part on misleading testimony1 regarding the nature of their work provided by a Kinsey Institute representative to
the United Nations Committee on Nongovernmental Organizations.
From their fraudulent sex research, to their collaboration with pedophiles to publish their sex experiments on children, to their promotion of risky sexual behaviors as healthy and normal, which has formed the basis of dangerous sexuality education programs worldwide, the Kinsey Institute has caused incalculable harm to children, adults
and families. For this reason the UNs decision to grant ECOSOC status to the Kinsey Institute has outraged parents, government and civic leaders, lawmakers, researchers, and victims of sexual crimes around the world who
understand how harmful the Kinsey Institutes work has been, especially for the worlds children.
This brief will show how the past and present actions, goals and aims of the Kinsey Institute merit condemnation
and censure rather than the legitimacy, prestige and access that UN consultative status affords them and which
enables them to perpetuate their harmful work on a much larger world stage.
This brief will also explore:
The misleading nature of four major statements the Kinsey Institute made in their testimony before the UN
Committee: 1) that they are not an advocacy organization; 2) that they are a research organization; 3)
that they promote responsible sexual behavior; and 4) that they work to advance sexual health.
The fraudulent and flawed nature of the Kinsey Institutes sex research* past and present.
How the Kinsey Institutes sex research has been used to argue for the repeal or modification of numerous
laws that protect children and uphold standards of decency, urge reductions in penalties for sex crimes
against women and children, and to promote their dangerous sexual ideologies to the worlds children
and youth, thereby endangering their health and well-being.
The current activities of the Kinsey Institute that pose a danger to children worldwide.

* Kinseys research methods have been widely criticized as unscientific and grossly skewed. His research has been dismissed by qualified researchers for failing
to meet even minimal standards of accepted research design. Kinsey used biased, unrepresentative samples and coercive interview tactics to elicit his data purporting to show that most people are highly promiscuous and regularly engage in unconventional sexual behavior. The data Kinsey collected were fraudulent
and misleading. Throughout this brief, when referring to Kinseys work, the term research is used very loosely.
page 1 of 14

The Kinse y Ins t i t u t e E x p o sed: A Warning to Pa re nts & G ov e rnm e nts Thr o ug hou t the W orld

Finally, this brief provides a list of 10 probing questions that we are urging the UN Committee on NGOs to ask
the Kinsey Institute and which if answered honestly, would provide the rationale for the UN to rescind the Kinsey
Institutes consultative status. (See Appendix 1)
We invite all parents, citizens, opinion leaders, officers of government and members of civil society to help protect
the health and innocence of children worldwide by joining the Stop the Kinsey Institute Coalition and taking the
suggested actions at the end of this brief that will help expose and stop their harmful work.

Overview of the Kinsey Institute

The Kinsey Institute was originally founded as an affiliate of Indiana University in 1947 by zoologist Alfred Kinsey
under the name Institute for Sex Research. Since then, the name of the Institute has evolved, but the purpose of
the Institute has remained the same. For this reason, and because the Kinsey Institute of today has never disavowed
many of the questionable, even illegal, activities of Alfred Kinsey and his colleagues or the original Institute, the
Kinsey Institute of today must be considered to be inextricably linked to the work of Alfred Kinsey and the work of
the original Institute for Sex Research, which now proudly bears his name.
Kinseys personal fascination with all kinds of sex acts, as well as his own well-documented sexual fetishes and
habits (including engaging in sadomasochistic, homosexual, adulterous and voyeuristic behaviors), greatly influenced the Kinsey Institutes founding philosophies, the nature of their sex research, and the development of their
trademark nonjudgmental approach to research on human sexuality.
Kinsey personally interviewed thousands of people regarding their sex lives for the Institutes research and insisted on
knowing every detail. He was especially proud of his nonjudgmental interviewing skills, which enabled his subjects
to more freely disclose the most intimate details of their sex lives. Kinsey hired additional sex researchers and
trained them in this same nonjudgmental approach to interviewing and sexuality research, even requiring them to engage in sex acts in his attic, often while being filmed, ostensibly in the name of science.
In fact, the Sexual Attitude Restructuring Seminars (SARS)2 in which modern day sexologists are required to participate,
largely mirror Kinseys methods. To become certified sexologists today, students are required to participate in one of
these SARS events, which includes watching hours of pornography depicting a wide array of sex acts to help them
readjust their sexual attitudes so they can counsel in a nonjudgmental way and become desensitized to even the
most bizarre and potentially harmful sexual behaviors.
The Kinsey Institutes nonjudgmental or all-inclusive approach to sexual behavior is a major reason why their work is
so harmful. Societies have always put restrictions on harmful sexual activities, including such things as pedophilia,
bestiality, and others that are recognized as abnormal disorders by mental health professionals worldwide. It is one
thing to document that various abnormal behaviors exist; it is another thing to claim, as Alfred Kinsey did, that since
these behaviors are being practiced by some people, they are, therefore, normal and healthy.
Kinseys belief that all consensual sexual behaviors are healthy and that it is societys prohibitions on promiscuous
sex, not the promiscuous behaviors themselves that cause problems, has not only permeated the philosophies and
work of the Institute to this day, but has also had a major impact on sex studies, research and sexual education

page 2 of 14

The Kinse y I ns ti t u t e E x p o sed: A Warning to Pa re nts & G ov e rnm e nts Thr o ug hou t the W orld

With the backing and credibility of Indiana University and funding from the Rockefeller Institute, Kinsey conducted
his pseudo-scientific research on human sexuality attempting to prove to the world that children are sexual from
birth and that promiscuous sexual behaviors of all kinds and at all ages are prevalent; therefore, they are normal
and healthy. This false philosophy has provided the philosophic foundation and rationale behind highly controversial comprehensive sexuality education programs that teach children of all ages they have a right to sexual knowledge and sexual pleasure and that teach children as young as age five they can experience self-pleasure through
masturbation. (See Appendix 4)
The Kinsey Institutes findings on human sexuality, initially published in Sexual Behavior in the Human Male and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (collectively known as The Kinsey Reports), have been used to promote pedophilia, incest, abortion, homosexuality, promiscuity, adultery, the legalization of same-sex marriage and much
The most controversial work of the Kinsey Institute, however, is the research they have promoted since 1948 on child
sexuality. In their book Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (which was reprinted in 1998 and is widely available), the
Institute published the notorious Table 34, which documents the sexual responses of children from infants through
teens as recorded by their adult male abusers. (See Appendix 2) These pedophiles conducted sexual experiments on
hundreds of children by bringing them to what the experimenters called orgasm (screaming, weeping, fighting the
sexual partner) and timing these responses with a stopwatch. To date, the Kinsey Institute has covered up this sexual abuse in the name of science and has refused to allow public examination of their original data or to reveal the
sources from which they were derived, thus, protecting the pedophiles with whom they admit to recruiting and collaborating.
Since its founding, the Kinsey Institute has been a strong advocate for legalizing and mainstreaming what are still
recognized as abnormal sexual behaviors in society. However, they have largely left the effort to indoctrinate the
worlds children in their sexual ideologies to other likeminded organizations that have adopted their philosophical
approach, primarily the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the U.S. (SIECUS) and Planned Parenthood.
In 1964 Kinseys co-author and former Kinsey Institute director, Wardell Pomeroy, became a founding SIECUS
board member, and Dr. Mary Calderone, the medical director for Planned Parenthood, became the founding president of SIECUS. To date, SIECUS and Planned Parenthood have been the world leaders in creating and promoting
comprehensive sexuality education programs that incorporate Kinseys controversial sex philosophies and that encourage children and adults to explore their alleged sexual desires without constraints.

The Kinsey Institutes Claim to the UN: We are not

an advocacy organization.
The Kinsey Institute has been and continues to be an aggressive sexual rights advocacy organization.
Their research and advocacy has contributed to the widespread promotion of promiscuous sex and the
liberalization of sex laws to the detriment of children, adults, families and societies.
The Kinsey Institute cosponsors and organizes advocacy events and helps fund controversial sexual rights advocacy groups. For example, in 2012, the Kinsey Institute cosponsored an advocacy and fundrais3
ing event, called Sexuality 2012: Research, Activism, Social Change. The Institutes website characterized this event
page 3 of 14

The Kinse y Ins t i t u t e E x p o sed: A Warning to Pa re nts & G ov e rnm e nts Thr o ug hou t the W orld

as a unique opportunity to learn what is being done to advance social attitudes and sexual freedom, and how you
can be part of transforming our world. Indicative of the attitudes the event was advancing, one discussion focused on
how to normalize same-sex marriage, and a beneficiary of this fundraiser was the Foundation for Sex Positive Culture,
an organization that hosts workshops on how to effectively tie ropes and other restraints on a sexual partner (whether
voluntary or involuntary is unspecified) in order to engage in bondage sex, how to perform anal sex, how to use
whips in sexual encounters, and genital piercing. Other Kinsey partners cosponsoring this event included Pride Foundation, a homosexual advocacy group whose stated goal is to ignite change that advances equality for the lesbian,
gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) community and the Tor Project, which promotes online anonymity, a
factor that is particularly appealing to those who engage in criminal sexual activities with non-consenting adult or
minor partners online.5
The Kinsey Institutes research and sexual advocacy work has contributed directly to the repeal of numerous laws protecting marriage and children in the United States. Kinseys testimony
and research have been credited with convincing state legislatures across the U.S. to reduce penalties for abortion,
rape, statutory rape, seduction, prostitution, wife and child battery, sodomy, bestiality, indecent exposure, incest,
bigamy, nudity, obscenity, adultery, fornication, adult-child sex, illicit cohabitation, pornography, and more. For example, in his testimony before the California Subcommittee on Sex Crimes in 1949, Kinsey claimed that according
to the Institutes research, 95 percent of nearly 9,000 males in our histories were sex offenders and considered
sexually deviant under the law; therefore, sex laws needed to be liberalized or repealed or practically all men
would be in jail. Kinsey also claimed that his extensive data on children proved they are unharmed by sex; that molesters dont repeat their crimes; therefore, we should parole all sex criminals. The subcommittee had originally
been organized to strengthen Californias sex crime penalties, but after hearing from Kinsey, they recommended
widespread paroles and leniency. Kinseys former director and co-author, Wardell Pomeroy, admits that Kinsey
personally worked on the revision of sex laws with the Illinois, New Jersey, New York, Delaware, Wyoming, and
Oregon commissions.

A group of 2,400 conservative U.S. lawmakers warn of the dangerous influence of the Kinsey
Institutes work on American laws. In their 2004 report, Restoring Legal Protections for Women and Children: A Historical Analysis of The States Criminal Codes, these lawmakers detailed how Kinsey, whom they called,
a pornography-addicted, sadomasochistic, bi/homosexual pedophile propagandist, was able to launch the sexual revolution, reduce sex crime penalties and sabotage American sex law. The report reveals that Since World
War II Kinseys fraudulent data informed and directed the American Law Institutes (ALI) Model Penal Code in eliminating and weakening 52 U.S. sex-related laws that once protected marriage. The ALIs penal law reforms recommended to legislators and lawyers were largely adopted between 1960 and 1980 and permitted Kinseys
[fraudulent reporting of the prevalence of] abnormal sexual conduct to be taught to American children via sex education. Since then, public health costs from sexual disease and dysfunction have skyrocketed; indeed, all measures
of socio sexual disorder have soared from the 1960s, when protective laws began to be weakened and/or elimi10
Westlaw, the most widely used legal database in the world, has more than 650 Kinsey cita11
tions in law journals from 1980 to 2000 and significantly important law journal articles citing
to Kinsey research from 1948 to 1980. In most cases, these citations refer to Kinseys fraudulent data to
support the liberalization of sex laws and for reducing penalties for sex crimes. For example, Kinsey Institute data
were cited in law journals over a 30-year period to promote the following changes to existing law, many of which
were successful:
Criticize judicial condemnation of sex offenders (Pennsylvania, 1952)
Lighten sex crime penalties (Ohio, 1959)
Promote the harmlessness of boy prostitution (Duke University, 1960)

page 4 of 14

The Kinse y Ins t i t u t e E x p o sed: A Warning to Pa re nts & G ov e rnm e nts Thr o ug hou t the W orld

Claim that children seduce men (Missouri, 1973, Tennessee, 1965)

Legalize sodomy (South Dakota, 1968)
Express beneficent concern for pedophiles (Georgia, 1969)
Reduce penalties for rape (Oklahoma, 1970)
Assert that 95 percent of males are sex offenders (Oregon, 1972)
Legalize prostitution (Maine, 1976)
In 1973, U.S. Supreme Court Justices relied heavily on Kinseys data to rule in the landmark Roe v. Wade case, which
legalized abortion in the U.S. Kinsey reported his research as showing that abortion was quite common and safe
among American women and that any problems from abortion were the result of illegal abortions not being per13
formed by doctors; therefore, abortion should be legalized. This argument has since been used at the United Nations and abroad.
The 1957 Wolfenden Report, a leading British study of homosexuality and prostitution, cited
Kinsey for authority on decriminalization of sex crimes. Immediately after, American homosexual advocates cited Wolfenden to justify loosening American laws on sodomy and homosexuality. The result was the le14
gitimization, legalization and spread of homosexual behavior on both sides of the Atlantic.
In 2003 an amicus brief co-authored by homosexual historian, John DEmilio, during his summer fellowship with the Kinsey Institute was used in part by the U.S. Supreme Court to rule in
the Lawrence v. Texas case that all U.S. anti sodomy laws are unconstitutional. This case resulted in the decriminalization of sodomy across the United States and was then relied on by the Massachusetts
Supreme Court in their decision mandating that their state, the first state in the U.S., legalize same-sex marriage.
More recently, the lead witness in the lawsuit challenging Californias pro-traditional marriage Proposition 8 cited Kinsey. This lawsuit resulted in overturning a provision adopted by direct vote of
the people to the California constitution defining marriage as
the union of a man and a woman and resulted in the
legalization of same-sex marriage in the state of California.

2. The Kinsey Institutes Claim to the UN:

We are a research institute.
The Kinsey Institute has perhaps one of the worlds worst reputations for promoting fraudulent and
biased research on human sexuality. The following evidence will show the fraudulent nature of their
research and how it is still being used today by pedophiles and advocates of comprehensive sexuality
education programs to promote the sexualization of children.
The Kinsey Institutes sex research has been largely dismissed by qualified researchers for
failing to meet even minimal standards of accepted research design. For example, Kinsey and his
team intentionally selected non-representative, sexually deviant research subjects, many of whom were convicted
sex offenders that were interviewed in prisons. Kinsey then attempted to draw conclusions about the prevalence of
these deviant behaviors in the entire U.S. population. This was clearly done in an effort to normalize unhealthy, abnormal and extreme sexual behaviors. In fact, it was the Kinsey Institutes flawed research that spread the widely

page 5 of 14

The Kinse y I ns ti t u t e E x p o sed: A Wa rning to Pa re nts & G ov e rnm e nts Thr o ug hou t the W orld

accepted myth that 10 percent of the U.S. population was homosexual, which laid the foundation for the homosexual activist movement in the U.S. and now worldwide. (The actual number has since been found to be approxi17
mately two percent, although the Kinsey Institute still publicizes the 10 percent figure.)
The Kinsey Institute admits that many of their research findings on sexual norms were based
on interviews with criminals, prostitutes and pedophiles rather than normal, healthy members
of society. Kinsey Institute researchers have since acknowledged the extremely serious problems with their sampling techniques. Daniel Flynn explains, In 1941, for instance, Kinsey visited forty
penal farms [prison compounds] where they collected sexual histories of inmates. Kinseys coauthors have also
since admitted that their prison histories ignored scientific sampling techniques and
focused on the most deviant
sex offenders, including those who had practiced incest, rape, and pedophilia. In fact, former Kinsey Institute director, Paul Gebhard, said regarding their research, At the Indiana State [Penal] Farm we had no plan of samplingwe simply sought out sex offenders and, after a time, avoided
the more common types of offenses (e.g.,
statutory rape) and directed our efforts toward the rarer types. Also, according to biographer James Jones, Alfred 20
Kinseys methodology and sampling technique virtually guaranteed that he would find what he was looking
for. This flawed sampling technique made sexually deviant behaviors appear to occur far more often in the general population than they actually did, thus, greatly influencing public thinking about sexual norms and sex-related
Wardell Pomeroy, Kinseys research field director and co-author of Sexual Behavior in the
Human Male, admits, We went to the [prison] records and got lists of the inmates who were in
for various kinds of offenses. If the list was short for some offensesas in incest, for examplewe took the
history of everybody
on the list. If it was a long list, as for statutory rape, we might take the history of every fifth or
tenth man. These fraudulent, misrepresentative, and misleading data based disproportionately on sexual and social deviants were used by courts and policymakers to make decisions and policies that have affected the lives of
countless people.
Pedophile groups still use the Kinsey Institutes flawed research to support and defend adultchild sex. Not surprisingly, such groups as the infamous North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA)
use Kinseys writings and research findings to support their promotion of sexual relationships between adults and
children, i.e., pedophilia. This disturbing quote from Alfred Kinsey, which blames the reactions of parents and others for any ill effects of child-adult sexual contact, appears on the NAMBLA website, along with a picture of Alfred
Kinsey: The emotional reactions of the parents, police officers, and other adults who discover that the child has
had such a contact, may disturb the child more seriously than the sexual contacts themselves. The current hysteria
over sex offenders may very well have serious effects on the ability of many of these children to work out sexual ad22
justments some years later. Further, NAMBLA writer Daniel Tsang says, Gay liberationists in general, and boy
lovers in particular, should know Kinseys work and hold it dear.
A chapter by Gerald Hannon in gay liberation book, Lavender Culture, asserts that society
needs to get rid of the archaic concepts of the innocence of children and the potential
harmfulness of sex, and directly cites Kinsey for support. A quote from the chapter claims, The
myth that children are not sexual beingsis maintainedin the face of massive evidence to the contraryInfants
in their cribs have orgasmsKinsey documented them in babies less than a year old.
Known pedophile, Tom OCarroll, former chairman of the British Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), cites Kinsey extensively in his book PaedophiliaThe Radical Case. A sobering
quote from his book explains, Alfred Kinsey and his co-researchers ... made almost as much impact in the early
post-war years as Freud had in his time. OCarrolls book also includes this alarming statement taken from Kinseys Sexual Behavior in the Human Male: It is probable that half or more of the boys in an uninhibited society
could reach climax by the time they were three or four years of age, and that nearly all of them could experience
such a climax three to five years before the onset of adolescence.

page 6 of 14

The K inse y I ns t i t u t e E x p o sed: A Warning to Pa re nts & G ov e rnm e nts Thr o ug hou t the W orld

Kinseys claim that children can and should be sexual from the earliest stages of life has become the basis for virtually all modern comprehensive sexuality education programs taught
around the world. Explaining the history of comprehensive sexuality education, internationally recognized expert, Dr. Miriam Grossman, says, The modern sex-ed movement began in the 1960s using American Alfred Kin29
seys model of modern sexuality as a foundation. In 1964, Dr. Mary Calderone, a Kinsey enthusiast, founded
SIECUS (Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States) and taught that from the day (chil30
dren) are born, they are sexual beings. Referring to Kinseys research, Calderone stated that professionals who
study children have affirmed the strong sexuality of the newborn.31 Dr. Grossman further explains that Wardell
Pomeroy served on the original board of directors of SIECUS, that SIECUS has since partnered with the United
Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), extensively and that one of the main authors of UNESCOs highly controversial International Guidelines on Sexuality Education (see Appendix 4) was a
former director of SIECUS. Thus, Kinseys intellectual offspring continue to assault childrens innocence and health
through the far-reaching comprehensive sexuality education programs of today.

3. The Kinsey Institutes Claim to the

UN: We advocate for responsible sexual
The Kinsey Institutes original research team practiced and promoted irresponsible and illegal sexual
behaviors and continues to defend these actions today.
Kinsey protected the identities of known pedophiles and asked them to document their abuse
thereby giving legitimacy to, and no doubt encouraging, sex crimes on children in the name of
science. John Bancroft, M.D., emeritus director of the Kinsey Institute, in his paper, Alfred Kinsey and the Politics
of Sex Research said that Alfred Kinsey was, particularly interested in the observation of adults who had been sex32
ually involved with children. It was Kinseys obsession with the sexual responses of children that led to the publication of the infamous Table 34 in Chapter 5 of Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, which documents the sexual
abuse of several hundred children. While there has been intense controversy as to how these data were collected,
and by whom, Kinsey himself states that at least nine adult men conducted or observed sexual contacts with children and confirms that these encounters are the basis for their data on childrens sexuality. In Sexual Behavior in
the Human Male, Kinsey states, Data on pre-adolescent climax come from histories of adult males who have had
sexual contacts with younger boys and who, with their adult backgrounds, are able to recognize and interpret the
boys [orgasmic] experiences ... 9 of our adult male subjects have observed such orgasm. Some of these adults are
technically trained persons who have kept diaries or other records which have been put at our disposal; and from
them we have secured information on 317 pre-adolescents who were either observed in self-masturbation, or who
were observed in contacts with other boys or older adults.
Kinsey states that child-adult sexual encounters were conducted and reported in order to
comply with the scientifically fair demand for records from trained observers. Kinsey then
proudly asserts, We have now reported observation on such specifically sexual activities as erection, pelvic
thrusts, and several other characteristics of true orgasm in a list of 317 pre-adolescent boys ranging between in35
fants of five months and adolescence in age. (Emphasis added.) Kinsey explains that the sexual reactions of
children were timed with [a]second hand or stopwatch. Table 34 in Kinseys book includes these data: an 11month-old baby experienced an alleged orgasm ten times in one hour; a four-year-old child and a 13-year-old
page 7 of 14

The Kinse y I ns ti t u t e E x p o sed: A Warning to Pa re nts & G ov e rnm e nts Thr o ug hou t the W orld


boy experienced 26 such alleged orgasms in a 24-hour period. Is one to believe that the 11-month-old baby
brought himself to orgasm 10 times in one hour, or that the four-year-old child stimulated himself repeatedly for
24 hours and timed his results with a stopwatch? Or was one of the men Kinsey interviewed just conveniently on
hand for 24 hours while he watched someone else sexually stimulate the child? If these menwhom Kinsey calls
our subjectstruly were trained observers, who trained them, and why did the Kinsey Institute not report them
and protect the children they were abusing? Many Kinsey researchers and biographers believe this is because the
Kinsey Institute encouraged and condoned this abuse.
Kinsey interprets sobbing and tears as part of normal climax and orgasm in children. For
example, in his book, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, Kinsey says child orgasms include sobbing, or more
violent cries, sometimes with an abundance of tears (especially among younger children) ... extreme trembling, collapse, loss of color, and sometimes fainting ..., pained or frightened expression, and violent attempts to avoid
climax38... Yet, in spite of these reactions, Kinsey concluded that children, derive definite pleasure from the situation.
The Kinsey Institute denies any collaboration with pedophiles, yet Kinsey himself clearly states
that he used information provided by adult men who had sexual encounters with children. Why
were Alfred Kinsey and his team not concerned with bringing these men to justice or protecting additional children
from their sexual assaults? Perhaps Alfred Kinsey best answered this question himself with this statement quoted on
the Kinsey Institute website: We are the recorders and reporters of the factsnot the judges of the behaviors we
describe. Apparently, this nonjudgmental approach extends even to illegal adult-child sex acts wherein a baby
is sexually molested for 24 hours. The Kinsey Institute defends their position on this issue stating on their website,
Without confidentiality, it would have been impossible to investigate the very private lives of Americans then, and
even now. This statement indicates that the protection of pedophiles is more important to the Kinsey Institute than
the protection of children.
Kinsey goes so far as to suggest that sexual stimulation is beneficial to babies, saying, A fretful
babe quiets down under the initial sexual stimulation followed by violent arm and leg movements, sometimes
with weeping and then subsides into calm and peace. Kinsey even suggests that children need the help of
adults in discovering their sexuality, especially effective methods of masturbation. This is not advancing sexual
health, but rather sexual abuse, as defined universally by laws around the world.
One of the probable victims of Table 34 known as Esther White, a woman now in her 80s, believes that it was Kinsey who encouraged her father and grandfather to sexually abuse her
when she was a little girl and to time her sexual responses with a stopwatch. Esther testifies that
she was personally interviewed by Kinsey at age nine, and at that time, she saw Kinsey pay her father a large sum
of money. She recently found a photo of her father with his fellow students at Indiana University. On the back of
photo, her father had written the words, Penis Education. Esther was interviewed to confirm this information for
this brief and expressed that she can die in peace if her testimony can finally expose the Kinsey Institute and prevent it from being an accredited organization by the United Nations. (A letter she has written to the UN accrediting
committee can be found in Appendix 3.) The Kinsey Institute dismisses Esthers claims with this statement on their
website, Kinsey did not ask people to fill out questionnaires or forms. There was no experimentation, and no one
was recruited to participate, and certainly not to molest anyone. It is surprising that not only did Kinsey collect
data from child abusers, but he accepted them as scientifically valid, or at least he presented it to the world as if it
were valid scientific research showing children are sexual from birth.
Former Kinsey institute director John Bancroft admitted that Kinsey lied about his data, yet
the Institute is still publishing them as if they were valid. Bancroft attempted to put the child sex
abuse controversy to rest saying, Soon after I became Director of The Kinsey Institute, I decided to check the
source of the information in Tables 31 to 34 ... I confirmed, beyond any doubt, that all of these data in Tables 31

page 8 of 14

The Kin se y I ns ti t u t e E x p o sed: A Warning to Pa re nts & G ov e rnm e nts Thr o ug hou t the W orld

to 34 had been collected by one man, who from 1917 until Kinsey interviewed him in the mid-1940s, had been
documenting his numerous sexual experiences.42 If Bancroft confirmed beyond any doubt that there was only
one man involved, why did Kinsey himself say there were nine, and how does this reflect on the validity of his
other research? Bancroft hypothesizes that it is because Kinsey did not want to draw attention to this one man, or
alternatively, because he was particularly interested in this evidence and did not want to diminish its possible sci43
entific credibility by revealing its single source. In other words, Kinsey was willing to lie to protect a serial
rapist/pedophile (or pedophiles) and the scientific validity of his data, which would no longer be considered
valid if the single source were known, since from a research design standpoint, to project sexual responses reported by one man to the whole population is ludicrous, and in and of itself, a fatal flaw. So we are left with two
choices: either Bancroft was lying, or Kinsey was lying about the source for the Table 31 to 34 data. Regardless of
which one you believe, the data are invalid, non-representative, and were obtained through the criminal sexual
abuse of children.
Paul Gebhard, who worked alongside Kinsey as part of the original research team, directly contradicts Bancrofts
claim. In a phone interview included in the documentary titled, The Kinsey Syndrome, Gebhard, when asked who
did the timing for the orgasm experiments said, It was dependent upon who it was. Most of it was done by one
individuala man with some scientific training but not a known scientist. The other cases were done by parents at
our suggestion ... and then there were some that were done by nursery school personnel. He was then asked,
Was that at your suggestion, too? Gebhard responds, Yes. These people would report to us ... we asked them
to watch [sexual behavior] and take notes, and if possible, time it and report back to usParticularly the one
man, but there was several pedophiles that gave us data. Then when asked, Do pedophiles normally go around
with stopwatches? Gebhard says, They do if we tell them that were interested in it.
Additionally, in the trial of Fritz von Balluseck, a German pedophile with whom Kinsey communicated, the judge
said to von Balluseck after reviewing letters Kinsey had sent him, I got the impression that you got to the children
in order to impress Kinsey and to deliver him material. Von Balluseck replied, Kinsey himself asked me for
The Kinsey Institute has repeatedly refused to make their files available for scientific review
or for the victims of the Kinsey pedophile reports. The Institute even refused to offer information in the
investigation of a child victim who was suspected to have been killed by von Balluseck. Former Kinsey Institute di46
rector, John Bancroft, has said, We will never reveal the identity of anybody involved to anybody else. He even
went so far as to say that revealing the pedophiles identities would be immoralityof the highest order.47 This
clearly shows the Kinsey Institutes firm position to protect pedophile informants while leaving children vulnerable to
sexual abuse. It is ironic that virtually the only sexual behavior on which the Kinsey Institute claims to take a
moral stand is the protection of known criminal child sex abusers.
The continuing promulgation of Kinseys child sex research as recorded by one pedophile (or
several, depending on which Kinsey statement is to be believed) is an affront to the scientific
community. Refusal to grant alleged victims access to this criminally obtained data is a fundamental breach of
their human rights. Further, the Kinsey Institute continues to profit from the sales of republished volumes of the Kinsey Reports. Whether Kinseys child sex data were compiled by one man or nine men, the sexual experiences documented with babies and children in Kinseys original volumes were, and still are, illegal; therefore, the Kinsey
Institute continues to profit from publishing as science the illegal acts of a pedophile or pedophiles.

page 9 of 14

The Kin se y I ns ti t u t e E x p o sed: A Warning to Pa re nts & G ov e rnm e nts Thr o ug hou t the W orld

4. The Kinsey Institutes Claim: We advance

sexual health.
Alfred Kinsey and his early research team practiced and promoted high-risk sexual behaviors, and the
Kinsey Institute continues to endorse high-risk sexual practices such as anal sex and the extensive use of
pornography today.
Kinsey and his colleagues practiced sexual masochism, masturbation, adultery, and homosexuality. Kinsey is reported to have shared his wife sexually with other men, engaged in sex acts with his fellow male
researchers, and often had sex with men he interviewed for his research. Kinsey is said to have circumcised himself without anesthesia, repeatedly pierced his genitals, masturbated by inserting a brush into his urethra, and injured himself by tying his scrotum to a rope while jumping off a chair. And one Kinsey researcher bragged about
having bedded a dog. All of these behaviors run counter to the advancement of sexual health. The Kinsey Institute has never condemned these behaviors, but rather, it proudly renamed the Institute in Kinseys honor. It might
be argued that it would be difficult for a person who practiced these extreme, high-risk sexual behaviors to present
an unbiased picture of what normal sexual behavior in a society looks like. Former director of the Kinsey Institute,
John Bancroft, said of Kinsey that he rebelled against what he regarded as the destructively repressive sexual
mores of his time. Indicative of this, Kinsey believed that there were only three kind(s) of sexual abnormalities:
abstinence, celibacy, and delayed marriage, ironically, all practices that promote legitimate sexual health.
The Kinsey Institute promotes anal sex with condoms as safe despite scientific evidence to
the contrary. Former U.S. Surgeon General, C. Everett Koop, said, Condoms provide some protection, but
anal intercourse is simply too dangerous to practice. In fact, the U.S. Federal Drug Administration (FDA) website
clearly states, Condoms may be more likely to break during anal intercourse than during other types of sex because of the greater amount of friction and other stresses involved. Even if the condom doesnt break, anal intercourse is very risky because it can cause tissue in the rectum to tear and bleed. These tears allow disease germs to
pass more easily from one partner to the other. However, on their website for college-age adultskinseyconfidential.orgthe Kinsey Institute promotes condoms for use in anal sex, saying that doing so makes it absolutely
safe. One article, Q&A: Is Anal Sex Safe? states, Yes. Anal sex can absolutely be a safe way to experience sex,
just as vaginal intercourse can be a safe way to experience sex ... STIs, including chlamydia, gonorrhea, HPV, and
HIV can all be passed through anal intercourse, so if you plan to have anal sex, it would be a wise idea to use
condoms. The author of this article, Debby Herbenick, is a sexual health educator at The Kinsey Institute. She is
also the author of, Good in Bed Guide to Anal Pleasuring, and the creator of MySexProfessor.com, a website that
openly promotes masturbation and embraces Internet pornography as acceptable entertainment.

Alfred Kinsey produced and directed films depicting sex acts in the attic of his own home.
These early pornographic films, produced at a time when it was illegal to record sexual acts, involved volunteers
and members of his staff and were filmed for supposedly academic purposes and to ensure that there was no
shame or guilt or repugnance attached to any sexual activity among senior staff members. These films reportedly
involved a variety of sexual behaviors including masochism, masturbation, adulterous sex, sadism, and homosexual
Kinsey Institute staff members have been accused of promoting radical unhealthy sexual ideologies. For example, the Kinsey Institutes Wardell Pomeroy, after accepting a position with the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS), an organization reportedly established as the education
outreach arm for the Institute, argued publicly for relaxing the taboos against pedophilia and even incest. A 1980
Time magazine article called Attacking the Last Taboo quoted Pomeroy: It is time to admit that incest need not be
a perversion or a symptom of mental illness. He said, Incest between ... children and adults ... can sometimes be
beneficial. Time magazine referred to Pomeroy as being part of the pro-incest lobby.58
page 10 of 14

The Kinse y I ns ti t u t e E x p o sed: A Wa rning to Pa re nts & G ov e rnm e nts Thr o ug hou t the W orld

A recent Kinsey Confidential website article for college-age adults indicates that it is common
for men and women to view extreme sexual images. The site states, Many people watch sexually explicit images of group sex,
bondage, anal sex, or oral sex even though they may not
partake in those types of sex. Recent research on the human brain shows that viewing pornography can
create addictions that negatively impact the brain in the same way as heroin and that pornography is especially
damaging to the developing brains of children. In a paper by Jennifer Brown called The Physiological Effects of Innocent Exposure to Soft-core Pornography on the Developing Brain, the author presents peer-reviewed research
on the brain showing how even seemingly innocent sexual images can have serious negative impacts on the brain.
Yet the Kinsey Institute has defended using hardcore pornography
in research experiments and denies that pornog60
raphy consumption is addictive as recently as March, 2014. These claims totally reject the growing body of evidence over the past decade documenting the negative impact of pornography addiction. This is not the position of
an organization truly interested in promoting sexual health.
The Kinsey Institute proudly houses a huge collection of pornography on-site available for student researchers and others to view. Their porn art collection includes 48,000 photographs, 7,000 artifacts, 8,000 films, and 4,000 videos categorized by such terms as Peepshow, Animal Sex Behavior, Swedish Erotica
and Art, Exploitation, Pornographic Feature Films, Heterosexual
and Homosexual Erotica, Sexual Education and
Therapy, Transgender, and Sadomasochism/Bondage. Art pieces from their pornography collection are put on
public display at their annual Juried Art Show. The Kinsey Institute also raises funds for the Foundation for Sex Positive Culture, which organizes
the annual Seattle Erotic Art Festival featuring sexually explicit artwork and sexual en62
tertainment of all kinds.
The Kinsey Institute publicizes newly available pornographic works. A link on the Kinsey Institutes
home page at kinseyinstitute.org introduces site visitors to a new addition to their archives: My Secret Life,
which is the lengthy, anonymous sexual memoir of a Victorian era man. This book is described as one of the
most openly erotic books ever written. The link includes an animated picture of a totally nude couple engaged in
sexual intercourse.
The Kinsey Reports was listed as one of the The Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th and 20th
Centuries by the Human Events Group of scholars and public policy leaders. The Kinsey Reports
was listed fourth on the list, right after The Communist Manifesto, by Karl Marx and Freidrich Engels; Mein Kampf,
by Adolf Hitler; and Quotations from Chairman Mao, by Mao Zedong. The writings and philosophies of Marx,
Engels, Hitler, and Mao have been used as the justification for actions that have resulted in the deaths of tens of
millions of people. It has been said that the writings and pseudo research of Alfred Kinsey are primarily responsible
for the moral decay of millions of people due to the modification of morality laws influenced by his research. As
sexual responsibility is abandoned in favor of sexual promiscuity and licentiousness, the public health costs to soci64
ety are enormous and virtually incalculable.

page 11 of 14

The K inse y I ns t i t u t e E x p o sed: A Warning to Pa re nts & G ov e rnm e nts Thr o ug hou t the W orld

What is the Kinsey Institute Doing Today?

Over the years the Kinsey Institute has managed to dodge most accusations and attacks, despite the welldocumented, damning information exposing their past ties to pedophiles and the sexual abuse of children.
The Institutes sex research provides the rationale for the indiscriminate promotion of sexual deviancy,
licentiousness and promiscuity, which is a multibillion dollar industry in the United States and across the
world. It publishes research on many sexual topics, not all of which are controversial. Relying on this
apparent legitimacy, the Kinsey Institute misled the UN Committee on NGOs on their ECOSOC application
and in their testimony. Upon close examination, evidence of their radical sexual agenda becomes readily
apparent. One need look no further than their new cell phone app designed to turn everyone into amateur
Kinsey sex researchers.

The Kinsey Reporter Cell Phone App: A Cause for Concern for All Countries

The research design of the new Kinsey Reporter cell phone app is as flawed as Kinseys original research and is
apparently designed to achieve the same results, this time on a worldwide basis. No legitimate research organization would continue to employ what they have already admitted as flawed methodology, yet this cell phone app
does exactly that as it helps the user track sexual activity across the globe. Users are invited to submit reports
about any sexual behavior you observeincluding your ownanytime and anywhere. Anonymous users can fill
out surveys about a variety of sexual topics including pornography use, unwanted sexual experience, sexual
fetishes, flirting, public displays of affection, and sexual activity. The app allows users to indicate the gender, age,
attitude, numbers of people involved and other indicators, including an under 20 designation that would allow
reports about sexual activity involving teens, children, or even infants. As users from across the world enter information, it is displayed on a map indicating approximate time and location of each sexual event and the country from
which it is reported. Then as users of any age scroll across the map on the Kinsey Reporter site, descriptive phrases
pop up for sexual behavior that has been reported like, solo, man, pleasure, orgasm, fun. Or threesome, loving, bisexual, man, man, woman. Or oral sex, young man, woman, lust.
It is interesting to note that the Kinsey Reporter site says, Kinsey Reporter invites you to become a citizen scientist
by contributing to sex research. Apparently, the Kinsey Institute still does not accept the definitions and protocols
of scientist and research, as any information the Reporter app might generate qualifies as neither science nor
research. The data collected by this app are completely unreliable, unverifiable, unrepresentative, and potentially
fabricated; therefore, they are useless in any legitimate scientific research. The app instead appears to be solely
designed to sexualize societies around the world, the same objective Kinsey undertook in the United States some
65 years ago with the publication of his male and female books claiming to document sexuality in the U.S.
The wording on the Kinsey Reporter app webpage is riddled with inconsistencies. For instance, the site includes Alfred Kinseys infamous quote, We are the recorders and reporters of factsnot the judges of the behaviors we describe, but then also states that, Kinsey Reporter staff makes no effort to verify the accuracy of crowd-sourced
reports. So while they say they are reporting facts they make no effort to make sure their facts are factual. The
site further claims that, By using Kinsey Reporter, you contribute to research on human sexual behavior, but then
this statement is contradicted indicating that the information collected is not based on a random or representative
sample of a community or population.
In his day, Alfred Kinsey solicited sexual information from the public, saying, Persons who have kept calendars, or
who are willing to begin keeping day-by-day calendars showing the source and frequency of their sexual outlet are
urged to write to us for instructions. Clearly the very same model is being employed by the Kinsey Institute today
in the form of the Kinsey Reporter app. Data contributors are told they are scientists, thus, lending validity and
page 12 of 14

The Kinse y I ns t i t u te E x p osed: A Wa rning to Pa re nts & G ov e rnm e nts Thr o ug hou t the W orld

status to any sexual encounters they may have; even if they are forced and criminal. This model clearly illustrates
that Kinseys current disciples are using the same tactics Kinsey used before them: collect questionable, unverifiable, unrepresentative data, present it to the public, and watch as the world believes the worst about itself and adjusts its laws to include and even protect and promote harmful sexual behaviors and perspectives.
The Institute is encouraging people to report any sexual activity they see. And in keeping with the Kinsey Institutes
intense interest in pornography, the Kinsey Reporter asks users what kind of porn they are watching: soft, hard, child
modeling, amateur, bisexual, female friendly, violent, fetish, bondage, gay or lesbianeven if participants are watching violent child porn, they want to document it. This latest Kinsey Reporter project flies in the face of the claims the
Kinsey Institute made to the NGO committee of providing research-based information that will support sexual responsibility.
UN Member States should be forewarned that the research the Kinsey Institute collects with their new phone app
from the reports of self-selected citizen scientists from countries around the world will likely be used to make the
case either by the Kinsey Institute or the sexual rights activist groups with whom it partners to decriminalize sex acts
in the countries where reports of certain behaviors are received. It will almost certainly also be used by countries
and organizations seeking to establish an international right to explicit sex positive comprehensive sexuality edu67
cation programs for even the youngest of children under the right to health. (See Appendix 4 for examples.)
Once governments understand that the Kinsey Reporter app will likely be used by aggressive sexual rights advocacy groups to generate sex data that will almost certainly be used to try to change their policies, laws, education
curricula, and especially sexuality education in their countries, these words from the testimony of the Kinsey Institutes representative before the UN Committee on NGOs take on new meaning:
Our work, we realized, has been very U.S.-centric over the years, and we feel a strong commitment and
responsibility to be available on an international level; to be available to you and to your countries and to the
UN agencies to provide research-based information that we may have that may help in policy decisions or in
education or in health care.
In other words, the Kinsey Institute wants to go global and wants to use to use their associations and influence at
the United Nations to give them an increased appearance of credibility.
The World Health Organization is in the process of revising its classifications of mental and behavioral disorders
and an International Advisory Group has been established to guide this process. It is possible that the unscientific
sex data collected around the world by the Kinsey Institute and using the Kinsey Reporter app may be used to try to
influence the classification of deviant or unhealthy sexual behaviors in this manual as normal and healthy. This is
just the beginning if the Kinsey Institute is allowed to continue to enjoy consultative status at the United Nations.

page 13 of 14

The Kin se y I n s t i t u t e E x p o se d : A Wa r ning to Parents & Governments Thr oughout the World

Call to Action
Now that the Kinsey Institute has been granted UN accreditation, its potential to affect and influence public opinion,
views, laws, and education on human sexuality around the world has substantially increased. As the Institute ex68
pands its self-described mission to advance sexual freedom to the countries of the world, it is almost certain that
laws that support sexual responsibility, protect the innocence of children, and promote public health will be undermined across the globe, just as they have been in the United States and other countries. The Kinsey Institute is already responsible, directly or indirectly, for harming countless children and for fueling the sexual revolution
With ECOSOC accreditation, the potential for the Kinsey Institute to do vastly greater harm is now a reality unless
all who understand the threat join together to warn parents, educators, policymakers and medical professionals.
We call upon all responsible citizens, officers of government, civil society leaders and organizations to join the Stop
the Kinsey Institute Coalition to expose the danger and oppose the efforts of the Kinsey Institute and all organizations that advocate policies and programs based on its flawed research claims and dangerous and unsupported
sexual rights advocacy.
You can help by taking one or more of the following four steps:

Go to StoptheKinseyInstitute.org and sign the letter to world leaders warning them and asking
them to help Stop the Kinsey Institute.

Find this brief on the StoptheKinseyInstitute.org website and forward it to as many people as
you can, inviting them to sign the letter.

Send this brief to as many high-level government officials as you can asking them to support
the rescinding of the consultative status of the Kinsey Institute at the United Nations.

Go to your local school and ask to review their family life or sex education (or comprehensive
sexuality education) curriculum to make sure it has not been influenced by dangerous Kinsey
sexual ideologies. Please report to us if you find their harmful sex philosophies have infiltrated
your school, and then organize other parents to help you have it removed.

1. When speaking before the Economic and Social Councils NGO Committee of the UN to apply for Special Consultative Status, Kinsey Institute
Communications Director, Jennifer Bass, stated: We are a research institute Our work, we realized, has been very U.S.-centric over the years,
and we feel a strong commitment and responsibility to be available on an international level, to be available to you and to your countries and to the
UN agencies to provide research-based information that we may have that may help in policy decisions or in education or in health careWe are
not an advocacy organization. We are a research institute. We do not advocate for any particular stand other than responsible sexual behavior and
advancing sexual health and knowledge worldwide. That is where we stand. Full testimony can be viewed online at
2. Sexual Attitude Readjustment (Restructuring or Reassessing) Seminars are required for Sexology certification and usually include the required viewing of many hours, days or longer of explicit images depicting a wide range of sexual acts including sadism, masochism, homosexual and heterosexual
acts, sodomy and bestiality for the alleged purpose of desensitizing the viewer to these acts.
3. The Kinsey Institute. (n.d.). Sexuality 2012: Research, Activism, and Social Change. Retrieved from
4. The Pride Foundation. (n.d.). Who we are: Our history. Retrieved from http://www.pridefoundation.org/about/history/

page 14 of 14

The Kinse y I ns ti t u t e E x p o sed: A Warning to Pa re nts & G ov e rnm e nts Thr o ug hou t the W orld

5. Tor. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.torproject.org/

6. The Subcommittee on Sex Crimes of the Assembly Interim Committee on Judicial System and Judicial Process (Preliminary Report), H. Res. 2321949, 43-1949 At 103, 105, 117 (Cal.1949).
7. Reisman, J. G., Staver, M. D., Akers, S. D., Crampton, S. M., Mast, R. L., Schmid, D. J. (2014). Reliance on Kinseys Scientific Child Sex Atrocities
and the Effects of His Crime and Fraud on Past and Current Law and Public Policy. Kinseys Criminal Psychopathology in American Law. Retrieved from
8. Pomeroy, W. B. (1972). Dr. Kinsey and the Institute for Sex Research. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
9. These lawmakers were members of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).
10. The American Legislative Exchange Council. (2004). Restoring Legal Protections for Women and Children: A Historical Analysis of the States Criminal Code. Washington, DC: Jeffrey, L.
11. Flynn, D. J. (2004). Intellectual Morons: How Ideology Makes Smart People Fall for Stupid Ideas. New York, NY: Crown Forum.
12. RSVP America Campaign. (2009). Scientific Fraud at the Heart of Roe v. Wade: Kinseys Abortion Legacy: An Overview of Unexamined Abortion
Data Cited by Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), to the American Law Institute Model Penal Code, whose authorities are Calderones Abortion in the
United States, 1958, and the Kinsey Institutes Third Volume, Pregnancy, Birth and Abortion, 1958. Crestwood, Kentucky: Jeffrey, L., Ray, R. D.
13. Reisman, J. G., (2003). Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences. Crestwood, KY: Institute for Media Education.
14. Reisman, J. G., Staver, M. D., Akers, S. D., Crampton, S. M., Mast, R. L., Schmid, D. J. (2014). Reliance on Kinseys Scientific Child Sex Atrocities
and the Effects of His Crime and Fraud on Past and Current Law and Public Policy. Kinseys Criminal Psychopathology in American Law. Retrieved from
15. Discover the Networks. (n.d.). John DEmilio. Retrieved from http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1996
16. Fitzpatrick,. B. World Net Daily. (2010, October 17). Stunner! Kinsey Paid My Father to Rape Me. Retrieved from
17. Flynn, D. J. (2004). Intellectual Morons: How Ideology Makes Smart People Fall for Stupid Ideas. New York, NY: Crown Forum.
18. Flynn, D. J. (2004). Intellectual Morons: How Ideology Makes Smart People Fall for Stupid Ideas. New York, NY: Crown Forum.
19. Flynn, D. J. (2004). Intellectual Morons: How Ideology Makes Smart People Fall for Stupid Ideas. New York, NY: Crown Forum.
20. Jones, J. (2004). Alfred C. Kinsey: A Life. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
21. Flynn, D. J. (2004). Intellectual Morons: How Ideology Makes Smart People Fall for Stupid Ideas. New York, NY: Crown Forum.
22. NAMBLA. (n.d.). Alfred Kinsey. Retrieved from http://nambla.org/kinsey.html
23. Tsang, D. (Ed.). (1981). The Age Taboo: Gay Male Sexuality, Power, and Consent. Boston, MA: Alyson Publications.
24. Hannon, G. (1994). Gay Youth and the Question of Consent. In K. Jay & A. Young (Eds.), Lavender Culture (pp. 342-364). New York, NY: New York
University Press.
25. Hannon, G. (1994). Gay Youth and the Question of Consent. In K. Jay & A. Young (Eds.), Lavender Culture (pp. 342-364). New York, NY: New York
University Press.
26. OCarroll, T. (2014). Paedophilia - The Radical Case [Revised Html version]. Retrieved from
27. Kinsey, A. (1998). Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
28. Flynn, D. J. (2004). Intellectual Morons: How Ideology Makes Smart People Fall for Stupid Ideas. New York, NY: Crown Forum.
29. History of Comprehensive Sexuality Education. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.stopsexualizingchildren.org/ssc/history.cfm.


The Kinse y Ins t i t u t e E x p o sed: A Warning to Pa re nts & G ov e rnm e nts Thr o ug hou t the W orld

30. History of Comprehensive Sexuality Education. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.stopsexualizingchildren.org/ssc/history.cfm.

31. History of Comprehensive Sexuality Education. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.stopsexualizingchildren.org/ssc/history.cfm..
32. Bancroft, J. (2004). Alfred C. Kinsey and the Politics of Sex Research. Annual Review of Sex Research, 15, 1-39.
33. Kinsey, A. (1998). Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
34. Kinsey, A. (1998). Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
35. Kinsey, A. (1998). Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
36. Kinsey, A. (1998). Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
37. Kinsey, A. (1998). Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
38. Kinsey, A. (1998). Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
39. The Kinsey Institute. (n.d.). Library and Special Collections. Retrieved from http://kinseyinstitute.org/library/
40. Kinsey, A. (1998). Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
41. Kinsey, A. (1998). Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
42. Bancroft, J. (2004). Alfred C. Kinsey and the Politics of Sex Research. Annual Review of Sex Research, 15, 1-39.
43. Bancroft, J. (2004). Alfred C. Kinsey and the Politics of Sex Research. Annual Review of Sex Research, 15, 1-39.
44. Aliano, C., Aguilar, S. (Producers), & Pinto, C. J. (Director). (2008). The Kinsey Syndrome [Motion picture]. (Available from American History Films).
45. Tate, T. (Producer). (1998). Secret History: Kinseys Paedophiles [Television series episode]. Yorkshire Television.
46. Tate, T. (Producer). (1998). Secret History: Kinseys Paedophiles [Television series episode]. Yorkshire Television.
47. Tate, T. (Producer). (1998). Secret History: Kinseys Paedophiles [Television series episode]. Yorkshire Television.
48. Aliano, C., Aguilar, S. (Producers), & Pinto, C. J. (Director). (2008). The Kinsey Syndrome [Motion picture]. (Available from American History Films).
49. Flynn, D. J. (2004). Intellectual Morons: How Ideology Makes Smart People Fall for Stupid Ideas. New York, NY: Crown Forum; NNDB. (2014). Alfred
Kinsey. Retrieved from http://www.nndb.com/people/413/000059236/
50. Flynn, D. J. (2004). Intellectual Morons: How Ideology Makes Smart People Fall for Stupid Ideas. New York, NY: Crown Forum.
51. Bancroft, J. (2004). Alfred C. Kinsey and the Politics of Sex Research. Annual Review of Sex Research, 15, 1-39.
52. Statement of C. Everett Koop, MD, ScD, Surgeon General, U.S. Public Health Service and Deputy Assistant Secretary of Health, Department of
Health and Human Services, Before the Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives, February 10, 1987.
53. American Life Leagues STOPP International. (2014). FDA has continuously warned against condom use for anal sexTime to sue Planned Parenthood and schools. Retrieved from http://www.stopp.org/article.php?id=13565; U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2014). Condoms and Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Retrieved from http://www.fda.gov/forconsumers/byaudience/forpatientadvocates/hivandaidsactivities/ucm126372.htm#strong
54. Herbenick, D. Kinsey Confidential. (2013, December 12). Q&A: Is Anal Sex Safe? Retrieved from http://kinseyconfidential.org/anal-sex-safe/
55. My Sex Professor. (2011). The Pros and Cons of the .XXX Domain. Retrieved from http://mysexprofessor.com/sex-in-the-news/the-pros-and-cons-ofthe-xxx-domain/


The Kin se y I ns ti t u t e E x p o sed: A Wa rning to Pa re nts & G ov e rnm e nts Thr o ug hou t the W orld

56. Reisman, J. G., (2010). Sexual Sabotage: How One Mad Scientist Unleashed a Plague of Corruption and Contagion on America. Washington, DC:
WND Books.
57. Reisman, J. G., (2010). Sexual Sabotage: How One Mad Scientist Unleashed a Plague of Corruption and Contagion on America. Washington, DC:
WND Books.
58. (1980, April 14). Attacking the Last Taboo. Time, 115, 72.
59. Shifron, G. Indiana Daily Student. (2007). Health & Science: Kinsey Confidential. Retrieved from
60. Fisher, A. (2014). Kinsey Confidential. Frequent Porn Use: Addiction Label Inaccurate. Retrieved from http://kinseyconfidential.org/frequentporn-popular-addiction-label-lacks-evidence/.
61. The Kinsey Institute. (n.d.). Library and Special Collections. Retrieved from http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/library/index.html
62. Seattle Erotic Art Festival. (2014). Retrieved from http://thefspc.org/
63. Human Events. (2005). Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th and 20th Centuries. Retrieved from http://www.humanevents.com/2005/05/31/tenmost-harmful-books-of-the-19th-and-20th-centuries/
64. RSVP America Campaign. (n.d.). Alfred Kinsey and His Impact on American Law. Crestwood, KY: Shaheen, R.
65. Kinsey Reporter. (2014). Retrieved from http://kinseyreporter.org/
66. Tate, T. (Producer). (1998). Secret History: Kinseys Paedophiles [Television series episode]. Yorkshire Television.

67. See excerpts about comprehensive sexuality education at:

http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/082509_unesco.pdf; http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/gender_rights/sexual_health/en/;
http://www.oif.ac.at/fileadmin/OEIF/andere_Publikationen/WHO_BZgA_Standards.pdfand; http://thefspc.org/sexuality-2012/
68. Tate, T. (Producer). (1998). Secret History: Kinseys Paedophiles [Television series episode]. Yorkshire Television.


The Kinse y Ins t i t u t e E x p o sed: A Warning to Pa re nts & G ov e rnm e nts Thr o ug hou t the W orld

Appendix 1:

Questions the Kinsey Institute

Must Answer

Appendix 2:

Kinsey Report Tables 32 & 34

Appendix 3:

Letter from Esther White,

victim of Kinsey Institute Sexual Abuse

appendix 4:

Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE),

Excerpts from the World Health
Organization and UNESCO

Appendix 1

10 Questions for the Kinsey Institute

The founder of the Kinsey Institute, Alfred Kinsey, co-authored, Sexual Behavior in the
Human Female and Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Both publications are currently in
print and widely available.
Regarding pedophilia, in the Female volume, Kinsey writes:

It is difficult to understand why a child, except for its cultural conditioning,

should be disturbed at having its genitalia touched, or disturbed at seeing
the genitalia of other persons, or disturbed at even more specific sexual
contacts Adult contactsare not likely to do the child any appreciable
harm if the childs parents do not become disturbed.
Please explain:
(a) If the current position of the Kinsey Institute is that adult-child sexual
contact is an acceptable and harmless behavior under any circumstance.
(b) The Institutes position on pedophilia or adult/child sexual contact of
any kind.
(c) If the institute has repudiated the position represented in the above quote,
please also provide the earliest repudiation statement in context and the date
it was made. Also, please provide a list of any other statements or conclusions
presented in this volume that have been repudiated, withdrawn or otherwise
modified by the Institute.
2) In the book, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, Kinsey, states that bestiality, (human
sex with animals) is a normal part of life, and that therapists should reassure people who
practice bestiality that it is a normal sexual behavior (p. 677). Currently, bestiality is illegal in
the majority of UN Member States. Please explain in detail what the Kinsey Institutes position is on bestiality today.
3) Please explain how the data on child orgasms (including from infants and toddlers) in
Table 34 of Sexual Behavior in the Human Male were obtained? Specifically, please make
available the following:
(a) Information on how the Institute came in contact with the pedophiles who
conducted the sexual experimentation on children.
(b) All files relating to the communications the Kinsey Institute or their past or
present staff members had with the pedophiles who allegedly brought these
children to orgasm.
(c) Information on any follow up efforts to see the impact on the sexual development and well-being of children who were subject of the sexual experiments by pedophiles that were document in Table 34.
(d) Information on any attempts by the Kinsey Institute to report illegal sexual
activities with children to authorities.

(e) Information on any current or past Kinsey Institute researchers, employees, staff, or affiliates that have been arrested for child molestation or other
serious crimes.
4) Please explain why the Kinsey Institute has cosponsored at least one event with and
raised funds for the Foundation for Sex Positive Culture, which advocates for many things
that are illegal in numerous UN Member States, including sex with multiple partners,
bondage sex, anal sex, homosexuality, and the public display of pornography.
5) Regarding the Kinsey Institutes new cellular phone app, The Kinsey Reporter, (www.kinseyreporter.org), and which the Institute is encouraging people around the world to download
to their phones, please explain:
(a) Why, on the website, the Institute tells people, by using the Kinsey Reporter, you are contributing to the research on human sexual behavior, but
then also states on the page that describes the app that the data have no scientific value. Please explain this discrepancy.
(b) Your representative stated in her testimony to the U.N. Committee that
the Kinsey Institute is a research organization. Since the Institute admits that
the data collected through the app have no research or scientific value, what
is the Institutes purpose for asking people to report on the type of pornography they are watching and the sex acts they are engaged in or
witnessing? Please explain in detail why such information is being collected
by the Institute on an international basis and the purpose for the interactive
world map where the sex data are posted.
(c) Is it the intention of the Institute to allow the sex data collected through
this app or by any other means to be used by advocacy organizations to
modify or repeal laws relating to sexual behavior in any UN Member States?
6) Conclusive scientific evidence accumulating over the past decade shows that pornography can alter normal brain structure and function and can become addictive for many people. Research also shows that the harmful effects are particularly severe in young people.
Since the Kinsey Institute collects and preserves an extensive collection of erotic and pornographic movies, books, and magazines, including depictions of homosexual and heterosexual sex acts, and periodically makes this kind of material available to the public, please
explain in detail:
(a) How the Institute, an organization that states it is dedicated to the promotion of sexual health, reconciles its position on pornography, which is
not only unhealthy, but is illegal in many UN Member States.
(b) Whether any of the erotic or pornographic materials in the Kinsey collection depict the nudity of children or could be considered in any way to be
child pornography. (Please provide the list of all of the titles in the Kinsey collection.)
(c) The Institutes purpose for collecting this material and making it available to the public.
(d) Whether the Institute would ever exhibit its collection at the United Nations or in any UN Member State, and if so, under what circumstances.

7) It is widely reported that the founder of the Kinsey Institute, Alfred Kinsey, engaged adultery, masochistic masturbation and in heterosexual and homosexual sex (with his students,
staff and their spouses), and made pornographic films, including filming the sex acts of his
co-workers and students as part of his scientific research, even though many of these activities were illegal at the time, and are illegal in many UN Member States today. Please explain
in detail:
(a) Which, if any, of these research techniques are still used by the Institute
currently or are condoned by the Institute as acceptable research techniques.
(b) If the Institute intends to gather data on any of these behaviors in any UN
Member State in which these behaviors are illegal.
(c) The Institutes policy on respecting the national, state and local laws in
any country in which it may become active.
8) In 1949, in Kinseys testimony before the California Subcommittee on Sex Crimes, he
stated that the research conducted by the Institute confirms that sex offenders do not re-offend. He then called for full parole for all sex criminals without exception. These positions
are directly contrary to extensive research showing the high incidence of repeat sex crimes by
sex offenders. This problem is so severe that a number of countries have instituted mandatory sex offender registries to warn communities and law enforcement regarding the whereabouts of convicted sex offenders. Please explain what the position is of the Kinsey Institute
on these issues today? If it has repudiated this position statement by Dr. Kinsey, please provide evidence of such.

9) There are reports that Kinsey Institute research has been subsidized by sex industry businesses that may benefit financially from its findings and, therefore, the findings might be biased or compromised. Please provide the the following:
(a) A list of any sex industry businesses or leaders (i.e., any individuals, companies, organizations, or businesses that profit from the sale of pornography
or explicit images via the Internet, magazines, videos or any other medium)
that have made financial contributions of $1,000 or more to the Kinsey Institute since its founding.
(b) Any current or past connections, if any, that the current or past Kinsey Institute staff, researchers or associates may have had to sex industry businesses,
as per above..

10) In The Kinsey Reports volumes, the Kinsey Institute continues to publish controversial
sex research that it has admitted was based on flawed methodology and not based on random or representative samples. Numerous critics over the years have pointed out that, in a
similar position, any responsible research institute would have withdrawn and/or repudiated

its questionable findings and ceased to perpetuate them. The fact that the Kinsey Institute
has not done so, critics say, is proof that it is not a research organization as it claimed in
its testimony before the Committee, but rather a group that is fabricating science to be
used to advocate for legal and social change on controversial laws and policies related
to sex and sexuality. Please explain in detail:
(a) How the Kinsey Institute responds to such criticism.
(b) All efforts the Kinsey Institute has made to correct, withdraw or repudiate Kinsey published sex research findings known to not be based on
sound scientific methodology, or which failed to use random and representative samples.

Appendix 2



Page 178 of Sexual Behavior and the Human Male

by Alfred Kinsey - Published in 1948

Table 34

Page 180 of Sexual Behavior and the Human Male

by Alfred Kinsey - Published in 1948

Appendix 3

%6 ;/, &50;,+ (;065: **9,+0;(;065 6440;;,,

>(: 6<;9(.,+ >/,5 :(> ;/, 5;,95,; =0+,6 6- ;/, 05:,@ 5:;0;<;, ;,:;0-@05. ),-69, ;/, &50;,+
(;065: (**9,+0;(;065 *6440;;,, -69
:;(;<: >(: 05-<90(;,+ ;/(; ;/,9, >(: 56 6776:0;065 ;6
;/,09 (7730*(;065 ',9, (33 6- ;/6:, 65 ;/, 6440;;,, 0.569(5; 6- ;/, 05:,@ 5:;0;<;,D: /0:;69@ (5+
;/, -6<5+,9 3-9,+ 05:,@ >0;/ /0: -(46<: B69.(:4 */(9;:C +6*<4,5;05. ;/, 463,:;05. 6- */03
+9,5 >0;/ ( :;67 >(;*/
(4 65, 6- ;/6:, */03+9,5
3-9,+ 05:,@ -6<5+,+ ;/, 05:,@ 5:;0;<;, 65 ;/, *(47<: 6- 5+0(5( &50=,9:0;@ >/,5 /, >96;,
/0: -09:; )662 B$,?<(30;@ 6- ;/, <4(5 (3,C ;/(; >(: 79, 7<)30:/,+ 05
:;033 9,4,4),9
;/(; -69,:; .9,,5 ,+0;065 ;/(; >(: +0:.<0:,+ ;6 3662 302, ;/, 63@ 0)3,
@ -(;/,9 >(: 796<+ ;6 ),
65, 6- ;/, :6 *(33,+ 9,:,(9*/,9: -69 ;/0: )662 >/03, /, >(: <:05. 4, (: /0: :,? :3(=, ;6 +6 ;/, :6
*(33,+ 9,:,(9*/
7,9:65(33@ >0;5,::,+ 3-9,+ 05:,@ /(5+ 4@ .9(5+ -(;/,9 (5+ 4@ -(;/,9 ( 1605; */,*2 -69 1<:;
-69 /0: :,=,9(3 @,(9: 6- :6 *(33,+ 9,:,(9*/ -69 ;/, 05:,@ )662: 3-9,+ 05:,@ (3:6
>96;, B%/, $,?<(30;@ 6- ;/, <4(5 ,4(3,C
%/, -09:; )662 >(: 9,*,5;3@ 9, 7<)30:/,+ -69
;/, 05:,@ 5:;0;<;, ;6 *644,469(;, ;/,09
@,(9: 05 ;/, 0330*0; :,?<(30;@ )<:05,:: %/, 796-0;:
:;033 .6 ;6 -05(5*, ;/, 05:,@ 5:;0;<;, ;6+(@
%/, */03+/66+ :,?<(3 05*,:; *6440;;,+ (.(05:; 4, ;/(; 05:,@ /09,+ 4@ -(;/,9 ;6 +6 :,=,9,3@ (-,*;,+ 4, (5+ 3(;,9 (3:6 4@ /<:)(5+ (5+ /(: *(<:,+ <: )6;/ .9,(; 7(05 +<905. 6<9 4(990(.,
'/,5 >(: 63+,9 4@ -(;/,9 /(+ ( 4(::0=, :;962, ;/(; ;662 (>(@ /0: :7,,*/ (5+ 7(9(3@A,+ ;/,
90./; :0+, 6- /0: )6+@ ; >(: 9,(33@ /(9+ -69 4, ;6 ), 4@ -(;/,9D:
*(9,.0=,9 -69 @,(9:
(;/05. ;/, 4(5 ;/(; *6440;;,+ 05*,:; (.(05:; 4, -69 465,@ 7(0+ )@ 3-9,+ 05:,@ /04:,3- >(:
9,(33@ ;6<./ 65 4, ,46;065(33@ @ 6+D: .9(*, (5+ >0;/ ( 36=05. /<:)(5+ /(=, :<9=0=,+ ;
;662 ( 365. ;04, /(=, -6<5+ ;/, >(@ ;6 -69.0=, 4@ -(;/,9 )<; /(=, 56; -69.0=,5 3-9,+ 05
5 4@ ;,5 405<;, 7,9:65(3 05;,9=0,> >0;/ 3-9,+ 05:,@ /04:,3- >/,5 >(: ( */03+ 05 ()6<;
>(: -69*,+ ;6 :/(2, /(5+: >0;/ ;/, +,=03 /04:,3- , 0: +,(+ 56> (5+ 6+ /(: 1<+.,+ /04 (3
%/, 05:,@ 5:;0;<;, :;033 79646;,: ;/, 0+,( ;/(; B*/03+9,5 (9, :,?<(3 -964 )09;/ C %/(;D: ( 30, -964
;/, 70; 6- /,33 /03+9,5 (9, ;66 @6<5. ;6 ,=,5 .0=, *65:,5; ;6 099,:765:0)3, :,? >0;/ (5@65,
@ <5*3, >/6 >(: (3:6 65, 6- 05:,@D: 05*,:; :6 *(33,+ 9,:,(9*/,9: 463,:;,+ /0: :;,7+(<./;,9
>/,5 :/, >(: @,(9: 63+ (5+ 0; *(<:,+ /,9 ;,990)3, ;9(<4( ;/96<./6<; /,9 30-, @ <5*3, (5+ /0:

>0-, >,9, 7,9:65(3 -90,5+: >0;/ 3-9,+ 05:,@ (5+ /0: >0-, >/,5 ;/,@ 30=,+ 05 366405.;65 (5+
*(33,+ 05:,@ ( B"<,,9 <*2 C
6> *(5 ;/0: 69.(50A(;065 ), (**9,+0;,+ ;6 ;/, &50;,+ (;065: (5 69.(50A(;065 ;/(; *3(04: ;6 796
;,*; */03+9,5
%/, 05:,@ 5:;0;<;, ;,:;0-0,+ ;/(; ;/,@ 79646;, B9,:765:0)3, :,?<(3 ),/(=069 C 5@ 69.(50A(;065
;/(; (.9,,: >0;/ ;/, 79646;065 6- :,?<(3 79640:*<0;@ ;6 */03+9,5 0: +,-050;,3@
% 9,:765:0)3,
33 ;/0: :,?<(3 ()<:, ,:7,*0(33@ ;/6:, */03+9,5 >/6 >,9, 463,:;,+ -69 /09, )@ 05:,@ /(: +,=(:
;(;,+ ;/,09 B:,?<(3 /,(3;/ C - *6<9:, ;/, 05:,@ 5:;0;<;, B5,=,9 +0+ (5@ 9,:,(9*/C 65 ;/, *65:,
8<,5*,: 6- >/(; ;/,@ 79646;,+
256> ;/,:, (9, :/6*205. >69+: ;6 *6479,/,5+ %/0: 0: 653@ 4@ -(403@ :;69@ '/(; ( ;,990)3,
-(403@ :*(5+(3
69 (33 ;/, /<5+9,+: 6- 6;/,9 */03+9,5 >/6 >,9, ;69;<9,+ (: >(: >, 5,,+ ;6 :;67 ;/, 05:,@ 5
:;0;<;, -964 :79,(+05. ;/0: :,? B9,:,(9*/ C D4 :<9, :64, 6- ;/,4 *6440;;,+ :<0*0+, @,(9: (.6
6:; 6- ;/,4 (9, +,(+ 56> (4 56> 05 4@ :
!3,(:, ,+<*(;, @6<9 &
6440;;,, 65 >/(; 0: 9,(33@ .605. 65 (; ;/, 05:,@ 5:;0;<;, ;6+(@ %/,
(*<;, <5*65*,95,+ :03,5*, 65 ;/, =0+,6 *307 (: ;/, 05:,@ 5:;0;<;, .(=, ;/,09 ;,:;0465@ >(: +,=
(:;(;05. ;6 4, .<,:: @6< 1<:; +0+5D; /(=, (5@ 05-694(;065
79(@ ;/(; @6< >033 +6 ;/, 90./; ;/05. (5+ ,=,5;<(33@ *64, ;6 @6<9 6>5 *65*3<:065 ;/(; ;/, 05:,@
5:;0;<;, :/6<3+ 56; ), ()3, ;6 <:, ;/, &50;,+ (;065: (: ( >(@ ;6 (+=(5*, ;/,09 9(+0*(3 :,? 9,
%/0: /(: ),,5 =,9@ :05*,9,3@ >90;;,5 )@ ( :6 *(33,+ B 05:,@ 5:;0;<;, #,:,(9*/ $<9=0=69C

Appendix 4

United Nations Sexuality Education Guidelines and

Standards Reflecting Kinsey Philosophies
Modern comprehensive sexuality education programs are mostly based on fraudulent Kinsey science purporting to
show that children are sexual from birth and sexual behavior of all kinds are healthy and normal for children, adolescents, and adults. The sexuality education guidelines published by both UNESCO and the World Health Organization
(WHO) have clearly been influenced by the Kinsey Institutes view of human sexuality. In fact, the UNESCO guidelines
were coauthored by Nanette Ecker, a former director of SEICUS, an organization that was co-founded by a former
Kinsey Institute director and that relies on Kinsey science to create and promote sexuality education programs worldwide.
Below are some of the controversial excerpts from the original UNESCO International Guidelines on Sexuality Education which reflect Kinsey science and philosophies. The full guidelines can be found at this link: http://www.refworld.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/rwmain?docid=4a69b8902
Learning Objectives for Level I (ages 5-8)

Girls and boys have private body parts that can feel pleasurable when touched by oneself. (p. 43)
It is natural to explore and touch parts of ones own body. (p. 48)
Bodies can feel good when touched. (p. 48)
Touching and rubbing ones genitals is called masturbation. (p. 48)
Masturbation is not harmful, but should be done in private. (p. 48)
People receive messages about sex, gender, and sexuality from their cultures and religions. (p. 39)
All people regardless of their . . . sexual status can raise a child and give it the love it deserves. (p. 51)
Learning Objectives for Level II (ages 9-12)

Both men and women can give and receive sexual pleasure. (p. 43)
excitement and vaginal lubrication, penile erection and ejaculation. (p. 44)
Many boys and girls begin to masturbate during puberty. (p. 44)
Definition and function of orgasm. (p. 49)
Legal abortion performed under sterile conditions by medically trained personnel is safe. (p. 51)
Learning Objectives for Level III (ages 12-15)

Respect for the different sexual orientations and gender identity. (p. 48)
Both men and women can give and receive sexual pleasure with a partner of the same or opposite sex. (p. 50)
Everyone is responsible for their own and their partners sexual pleasure (p. 50)
Access to safe abortion and post-abortion care. (p. 52)
Stages of male and female human sexual response including orgasm. (p. 50)

Page 1 of 3

Excerpts from the Recommendations from the Kinsey-influenced World

Health Organizations European Standards for Sexuality Education
For Children Age 0-4 years
Give information about enjoyment and pleasure when touching ones body . . . masturbation
Enable children to gain an awareness of gender identity
Give the right to explore gender identities
For Children Age 4-6 years
Give information about early childhood masturbation
Give information about same-sex relationships
Give information about . . . different concepts of a family
Help children develop respect for different norms regarding sexuality
For Children Age 6-9 years
Give information about . . . different methods of conception
Give information about enjoyment and pleasure when touching ones own body, early childhood mastur
Give information about friendship and love towards people of the same sex
For Children Age 9-12 years
Give information about different types of contraception . . . enable children to use condoms and contra
ceptives effectively in the future
Gender orientation and differences between gender identity and biological sex
Give information about pleasure, masturbation, orgasm
Give information about sexual rights as defined by the International Planned Parenthood Federation and
the World Association for Sexual Health
For Children Age 12-15 years
Gender identity and sexual orientation, including coming-out/homosexuality
Give information about pleasure, masturbation, orgasm
Enable teenagers to obtain and use condoms and contraceptives effectively
Give information about sexual rights as defined by the International Planned Parenthood Federation and
the World Association for Sexual Health

Page 2 of 3

For Age 15 and up

Surrogacy, medically assisted reproduction and designer babies, genetics
Help teenagers to develop a critical view of different cultural/religious norms related to pregnancy, parent
hood, etc.
Help teenagers to develop a change from possible negative feelings, disgust and hatred towards homosexu
ality to acceptance and celebration of sexual differences
Sexual rights: access, information, availability, violations of sexual rights, right to abortion

The full WHO European standards can be found at this link:


Page 3 of 3