Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
http://www.uptodate.com/contents/distal-radius-fractures-in-adults?topicKey=EM%2F219&elapsedTimeMs=6&source=search_result&searchTerm=wrist+fract 1/35
Official reprint from UpToDate
www.uptodate.com 2014 UpToDate
Author
David J Petron, MD
Section Editor
Patrice Eiff, MD
Deputy Editor
Jonathan Grayzel, MD, FAAEM
Ad by FunDeals. More Inf o | Hide These Ads
Distal radius fractures in adults
All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.
Literature review current through: Apr 2014. | This topic last updated: Nov 14, 2013.
INTRODUCTION The distal radius is the most common fracture site in the upper extremity. Such injuries account for
approximately one-sixth of fractures treated in US emergency departments [1]. The Colles fracture is the most common.
Familiarity with wrist anatomy and the natural history of major fracture types is essential for appropriate management of
distal radius fractures [2]. This topic review will discuss the evaluation and management of distal radius fractures in adults.
Other wrist injuries are discussed elsewhere. (See "Evaluation of the adult with acute wrist pain" and "Overview of carpal
fractures".)
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND RISK FACTORS A review of over 1.4 million US emergency department (ED) visits found that
hand and forearm fractures account for 1.5 percent of all visits [1]. Of these, fractures of the radius and/or ulna comprise the
largest portion (44 percent).
The majority of distal radius fractures occur as isolated injuries in two distinct populations: youth involved in sport who
sustain a relatively high-energy fall, and seniors with osteoporotic bone who sustain a low-energy fall.
Athletics The cause of wrist fractures among young people varies according to the local popularity of different physical
activities. A Scottish study of distal radius fractures related to sport found that football (ie, soccer) produced 50 percent of
fractures [3]. Play on artificial turf increased the likelihood of fracture by a factor of five. Skiing, dancing, and rugby caused
12, 9, and 7 percent of wrist fractures, respectively. More severe injuries occurred as a result of skiing, horseback riding, and
dancing.
The increasingly popular sport of snowboarding has a high rate of associated extremity fractures, including those of the
distal radius. Physicians at a Japanese hospital caring for more than 10 ski areas evaluated over 5000 snowboarders for
injuries [4]. They found most distal radius fractures occurred in patients in their twenties (82.3 percent) without extensive
snowboarding experience (42 percent novices; 48 percent intermediates). Ninety-four percent of patients had not received
professional instruction, and 87 percent were not wearing protective equipment. Although less likely to be injured, more
experienced snowboarders were more likely to sustain a complex intraarticular fracture.
Geriatric population Both age and gender play a role in the risk of distal radius fracture. At 50 years of age, a white
woman living in the United States or Northern Europe has approximately a 15 percent lifetime risk of a distal radius fracture;
a man in the same regions has a lifetime risk of just over 2 percent [5].
One large, prospective study of distal radius fractures among Caucasian women with osteoporosis, over the age of 65,
involved in low-energy falls, found three statistically significant, independent risk factors: decreased bone density at the
distal radius (RR = 1.8), a history of recurrent falls (RR = 1.6), and previous fracture after age 50 (RR = 1.3) [6]. For women
over 75 years of age, dementia was an additional risk factor. Use of oral estrogen was found to be protective, and
intraarticular fractures were more than twice as frequent in women with diabetes.
Radial inclination (image 1 and figure 2) is the angle between one line drawn perpendicular to the long axis of the
radius and a second line drawn between the distal tip of the radial styloid and the central reference point (CRP). The
CRP lies midway between the palmar ulnar corner and the dorsal ulnar corner of the distal radius (image 2). The
average angle is approximately 20 to 25 degrees, although there are slight gender differences (24.7 2.5 for women;
22.5 2.1 for men) [13]. The angle is often smaller with distal radius fractures.
Radial height (image 1 and figure 2) is the distance between two lines drawn perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of
the radial shaft: one through the distal tip of the radial styloid and the second through the CRP. Normal height averages
11.6 1.6 mm [13]. The measured height is often smaller with distal radius fractures.
Ulnar variance (image 1 and figure 2) is the distance between two lines drawn perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of
the radial shaft: one through the distal articular surface of the ulnar head and the second through the CRP. Normally,
the radial surface is distal to the ulnar surface by 1 to 2 mm (negative ulnar variance) [13]. When the ulnar surface is
distal to the radial surface (positive ulnar variance), the biomechanics of the wrist can be impaired, especially if the
distance is 5 mm greater than the contralateral wrist.
Palmar tilt (image 3 and figure 3) is the angle formed by the intersection of one line perpendicular to the longitudinal
axis of the radial shaft and a second line drawn through the apices of the palmar and the dorsal rims of the radius. The
normal palmar tilt on a standard lateral projection averages 11.2 4.6 degrees and does not differ between genders
[13]. A smaller palmar tilt as a result of fracture is a risk factor for subsequent pain and disability.
AP distance (image 3 and figure 3) lies between the apices of the dorsal and palmar rims of the radius. Normally, AP
distance should be slightly larger than the width of the lunate, and it averages 19.1 1.7 mm. It is significantly larger in
males (20.4 1.1) versus females (17.8 1.7) [13]. It can increase as a result of axial impaction injuries and suggests
articular step-off.
Types I/II: Completely extraarticular; complications are uncommon once anatomic alignment has been achieved (image
4A-C)
Fractures with significant displacement or comminution; these are unstable and likely to lose position even if initial
reduction is near-anatomic
Beyond the Basics topic (see "Patient information: Cast and splint care (Beyond the Basics)")
Distal radius fractures are extremely common. Fractures in younger patients are the result of high-energy trauma, often
during sports. Fractures in older patients are frequently the result of low-energy trauma to osteoporotic bone. The
typical mechanism for distal radius fracture is a Fall Onto an Out-Stretched Hand (FOOSH). (See 'Epidemiology and
risk factors' above and 'Mechanism of injury' above.)
Examination at the time of injury should include inspection for open fractures and deformity, assessment of wrist
motion (if possible), and evaluation for associated injuries, such as scaphoid fracture or scapholunate ligament injury.
The wrist may appear normal despite the presence of a fracture. In the days following injury or fracture manipulation,
clinicians should pay close attention to neurovascular status (particularly median nerve function) and beware of acute
compartment syndrome. (See 'Clinical presentation and physical examination' above.)
Diagnosis is typically made by x-ray. Clinicians should study the standard plain radiographs of the wrist, including
anterior-posterior (AP), lateral, and oblique views, looking for any loss of normal anatomy, the presence and degree of
joint involvement (including both radiocarpal and distal radioulnar joints), and the presence of any high-risk features (eg,
comminution, articular step-off >2 mm). Abnormal measurements of radial inclination, radial height, palmar tilt, or ulnar
variance suggest significant injury. (See 'Radiographic findings' above.)
Emergent orthopedic referral is required for the following conditions (see 'Indications for orthopedic consultation or
referral' above):
Open fractures
Acute compression neuropathy or compartment syndrome
Vascular compromise despite reduction (emergent vascular surgery referral may also be required in this
circumstance)
Unstable fractures and those at high risk for complications should be referred to an orthopedic surgeon. We
recommend that fractures associated with the following conditions be referred to a knowledgeable orthopedist (Grade
1B) (see 'Indications for orthopedic consultation or referral' above):
Palmar displacement
Radial articular step-off greater than 2 mm, or involvement of the articular surface of the distal radial ulnar joint
Large ulnar styloid fractures with displaced fragments at the styloid base
Greater than 20 degrees of dorsal angulation
Displacement in any direction greater than two-thirds the width of the radial shaft
Metaphyseal comminution with more than 5 mm of radial shortening (normal height = 10 to 13 mm)
Ulnar variance greater than 5 mm compared with the contralateral wrist (normal variance is 0 to -2 mm)
Associated scaphoid fractures or scapholunate ligament injuries
Fracture-dislocations (see 'Fracture dislocations' above)
Advanced osteoporosis
Nondisplaced extraarticular fractures are relatively stable, and treatment is straightforward. We suggest the following
approach for acute management (Grade 2C) (see 'Initial treatment' above):
Displaced fractures with neurovascular compromise warrant an immediate attempt at closed reduction. Immediate
closed reduction by an experienced clinician is appropriate, but not required, for displaced fractures without
neurovascular compromise or radiographic evidence of instability. (See 'Radiographic findings' above.)
If a clinician capable of performing a reduction is unavailable and there is no neurovascular compromise, the provider
may immobilize the fracture, provide appropriate analgesia, and discharge the patient, provided follow-up the next day
for reduction by an orthopedist has been arranged.
Our recommendations for postreduction care of displaced fractures do not differ from that of nondisplaced injuries
described immediately above. (See 'Initial treatment' above.)
Criteria for adequate reduction in a patient with high functional demands include:
A schedule for follow-up care, including timing of radiographs, is provided for both displaced and nondisplaced
fractures. (See 'Follow-up care' above.)
Vigorous elderly patients with distal radius fractures should be referred for surgical treatment as indicated. However,
many older patients are best served by conservative fracture management (ie, without manipulation or fixation) and
rehabilitation designed to maximize function, despite the presence of significant deformity. (See 'Geriatric
management' above.)
Complications from distal radius fractures fall into two main categories:
Early complications include acute carpal tunnel syndrome, vascular injury, and compartment syndrome. (See
'Early complications' above and 'Complications of closed reduction and cast treatment' above.)
Late complications include tendon irritation and rupture (especially of the extensor pollicis longus), osteoarthritis,
wrist pain or instability, and loss of motion. (See 'Long-term outcomes/complications' above.)
Poor functional outcome correlates with abnormal anatomy. With the exception of a subset of low-functioning geriatric
patients, clinicians should aggressively seek to achieve congruent joint reduction and to prevent excessive loss of
radial length or abnormal tilt of the radial articular surface. (See 'Long-term outcomes/complications' above.)