Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Report
Reservoir Fluid
(PVT) Properties
Block S2 (Al Uqlah), Yemen
I
R T FIE
PR20060025
3 von 31
Executive Summary
Well
Kharwah-1
Zone
Kohlan
Date
of 29.3.2001
sample
Laboratory
WCP
Oilphase-DBR
(SLB), Dubai
report
01/LJA/169
Al-Nilam-1
Kohlan
12.8.2003
Al-Nilam-1
Lam
WCP
Oilphase-DBR
(SLB), Dubai
LJA24016A
WCP
Oilphase-DBR
(SLB), Dubai
LJA24016B
Habban-1a
30.6.2005
LEP (OMV)
RES20050057
PR20060025
4 von 31
PR20060025
Name
Klaus Potsch
Klaus Potsch
Klaus Potsch
August Burisch
5 von 31
Nomenclature, Abbreviations
6 von 31
PR20060025
7 von 31
4
Fig.
Fig.
Fig.
Fig.
Fig.
Fig.
Fig.
Fig.
Fig.
Fig.
Fig.
Fig.
Tables, Figures
1 Well locations................................................................................. 9
2 Pressure versus depth ................................................................... 11
3 Temperature versus depth.............................................................. 11
4 Gas solution ratio Rs versus saturation pressure psat .......................... 12
5 Gas solution ratio Rs versus formation volume factor Bo .................... 12
6 Reservoir fluid distributions ............................................................ 13
7 Saturation pressure versus depth .................................................... 15
8 Formation volume factor of oil vs. pressure ...................................... 16
9 Gas-oil ratio vs. pressure ............................................................... 16
10 Oil viscosity vs. pressure ............................................................. 16
11 Gas compressibility factor vs. pressure .......................................... 17
12 DLP, composition of solution gas. ................................................. 25
Tab.
Tab.
Tab.
Tab.
Tab.
Tab.
Tab.
Tab.
Tab.
Tab.
Tab.
Tab.
Tab.
Tab.
Tab.
Tab.
PR20060025
8 von 31
Introduction
The samples were taken at different wells and depths. A map shows the
location of the wells within Block S2.
Fig. 1 Well locations
Al Nilam-1
Habban-1a
Khawarah-1
For the purpose of getting an overview, the main parameters of the wells were
summarized in Tab. 2 and plots were made to detect inconsistencies as a first
step. If the data cannot be harmonized then the conclusion has to be made that
the reservoir consists of different compartments. Secondly, the distribution of
components will be looked at. A grouping of components, especially of the
heavy ends will lead to a shortened description of the fluid by means of which
the experiments will be matched. The dependence of the saturation (bubble
point) pressure with depth will be calculated. That allows for a consistency
check of the PVT reports.
PR20060025
9 von 31
Key PVT-data
The key PVT-data are listed in both systems of units SI (Tab. 2) and OF (Tab.
3).
Tab. 2 Formation data, OF units
well
formation
sample
sampling date
report date
depth SS
initial pressure
reservoir temperature
saturation pressure, pb
solution gas, Rsi
formation factor oil Bo
oil viscosity
gas viscosity
gas gravity (air=1)
rel oil density
rel oil density
pb,Tres
pb,Tres
pb,Tres
pb,Tres
pb,Tres
stc
pb,Tres
ft
psia
F
psi
scf/stb
bbl/stb
mPas
mPas
Al Nilam 1
Lam
SEP
15.12.03
May 2004
4858.9
3738
180.6
3450
1198
1.68
0.3
0.022
0.775
0.836
0.4976
Al Nilam 1
Kohlan
SEP
08.12.03
May 2004
5516.7
3905
193.7
3595
1210
1.683
0.27
0.022
0.79
0.838
0.4979
Habban-1a
Al Nilam 1
Lam
2293.0
812.0
1481.0
257.6
82.6
237.8
213.4
1.68
0.3
0.022
0.775
0.836
0.4976
Al Nilam 1
Kohlan
2493.5
812.0
1681.5
269.1
89.8
247.8
215.5
1.683
0.27
0.022
0.79
0.838
0.4979
Habban-1a
BHS
30.06.05
Oct 2005
5387.8
3865
199
3364
1155
1.744
0.398
0.0224
0.8352
0.4789
Kharwah 1
Kohlan
SEP
29.03.01
Jul 2001
6190.9
4067
221
3600
1588
1.953
0.29
0.022
0.761
0.833
0.4265
pb,Tres
pb,Tres
pb,Tres
pb,Tres
pb,Tres
stc
pb,Tres
m
m
m
bar
C
bar
scf/stb
bbl/stb
mPas
mPas
2450.0
807.8
1642.2
266.4
92.8
231.8
205.7
1.744
0.398
0.0224
0
0.8352
0.4789
Kharwah 1
Kohlan
2722.0
835.0
1887.0
280.3
105.0
248.1
282.8
1.953
0.29
0.022
0.761
0.833
0.4265
The most useful plots are pressure (Fig. 2) and temperature (Fig. 3) versus
depth, gas solution ratio Rs versus saturation pressure psat (Fig. 4) and versus
formation volume factor Bo (Fig. 5).
PR20060025
10 von 31
regression p res
regression p sat
3600
3000
4000
4500
5000
5500
Kharwah-1
3200
Habban-1a
Al Nilam-1, Lam
3400
Al Nilam-1, Kohlan
pressure, [psia]
3800
6000
6500
depth [ft]
200
160
150
4000
4500
Habban-1a
170
5000
5500
Kharwah-1
180
Al Nilam-1, Kohlan
190
Al Nilam-1, Lam
temperature [F]
210
6000
6500
depth [ft]
PR20060025
11 von 31
Kharwah-1
1700
1600
Al Nilam-1, Kohlan
1300
Al Nilam-1, Lam
1400
Habban-1a
Rs [scf/stb]
1500
1200
1100
1000
3350
3400
3450
3500
3550
3600
3650
p sat [psia]
Kharwah-1
1600
Habban-1a
1300
Al Nilam-1, Kohlan
1400
Al Nilam-1, Lam
Rs [scf/stb]
1500
1200
1100
1000
1.65
1.7
1.75
1.8
1.85
1.9
1.95
PR20060025
12 von 31
Fluid compositions
The fluid compositions of all well streams are known for every well to a different
extent: Kharwah-1 to C12+, the Al Nilam-1 samples to C30+ and the Habban-1a
to C120+. The distributions are only tabulated up to C30+. Concluding from the
graphical display (Fig. 6) one can see that the hydrocarbon distributions are
sufficiently close together so that an average distribution can be reasonably
calculated. The data is found in Tab. 4.
Fig. 6 Reservoir fluid distributions
carbon number
0
10
15
20
25
30
100
percentage
10
Al-Nilam-1, Lam
Al-Nilam-1, Kuhlan
Haban-1a
Kharwah-1, Kohlan
0.1
PR20060025
13 von 31
Kharwah-1
Kohlan
mol%
1.37
0
0.68
45.9
8.47
6.58
1.04
3.11
1.03
1.47
2.17
3.83
4.47
2.77
2.22
1.62
13.28
average
group
mol%
0.71
0.00
0.52
C1+N2
44.89
8.39 C2+CO2
C3
6.52
C4
1.12
C4
3.31
C5
1.18
C5
1.67
2.23
psc1
3.79
psc1
3.92
psc1
2.68
psc2
2.29
psc2
1.66
psc2
1.43
psc2
1.39
psc3
1.24
psc3
1.17
psc3
0.94
psc3
0.82
psc3
0.80
psc4
0.72
psc4
0.56
psc4
0.51
psc4
0.50
psc4
0.42
psc4
0.39
psc4
0.38
psc4
0.31
psc4
0.32
psc4
0.28
psc5
0.29
psc5
2.65
psc5
The last column of Tab. 4 indicates the grouping of the components for the
modelling exercise. The total number of components was limited with 10 in
order to keep the potential compositional reservoir simulation time short. The
divisions of the pseudocomponents were made in such a way that they had
equal mass.
PR20060025
14 von 31
Assuming one common fluid composition allows for checking the PVT data of
the different reports on consistency by using an EOS. In the present case the
Peng-Robinson EOS with non-zero BICs was employed, for the liquid viscosity
the Pederson model was used. The data against which the EOS was tuned was
the data set of Habban-1a. The reason of this decision was that they originate
from the only bottom hole sample and it was also the most recent data. If the
reservoir fluids are from the same pool, then the data of the PVT-studies with
the separator samples should be able to be reproduced by a compositional
grading calculation. That calculation takes care of the dependence of the PVT
parameters with depth. The plot of the saturation pressure versus depth Fig. 7
gives us a valuable insight into the quality of the available PVT data.
Fig. 7 Saturation pressure versus depth
3650
Al-Nilam-1, Kohlan
3500
3450
3300
psat claculated
psat experimental
Habban-1a
3350
Al-Nilam-1, Lam
3550
3400
Kharwah-1
3600
3250
3200
3150
4700
4900
5100
5300
5500
5700
5900
6100
6300
depth [ft]
The calculation shows a decreasing trend of the saturation pressure with depth.
Al-Nilam-1, Lam formation is following this trend. Al-Nilam-1, Kohlan formation
and Kharwah-1 seem to have a saturation pressure that is too high. The cause
can be that the GOR at the separator was measured too high or there was
simply a miswriting of a number.
The next step was to match the experimental PVT data Habban-1a with an EOS.
After the match was achieved the reservoir temperature was changed to the
ones of the other samples and the PVT data were calculated. The results of that
exercise are displayed in Fig. 8 - Fig. 11.
PR20060025
15 von 31
1.8
Bo
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
3000
3500
4000
1600
1400
Habban-1a, exp.
Kharw ah-1, EOS
Rs [scf/stb]
1200
1000
Habban-1a, EOS
800
600
400
200
0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
PR20060025
16 von 31
1.4
1.2
[mPas]
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
3000
3500
4000
0.98
0.96
Habban-1a, exp.
Kharw ah-1, EOS
0.94
0.92
0.9
0.88
0.86
0.84
0.82
0.8
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
PR20060025
17 von 31
p0 abs
pb abs
1.01325
232
Formation volume factor oil (DLP) Bod
1.0682
1.7441
Formation volume factor oil (CCE) Bof
1.0682
1.652
Formation volume factor gas (DLP) Bg
1.3577 0.00515
Gas oil ratio (DLP)
Rsd
0
205.88
Gas oil ratio (CCE)
Rsf
0
198.00
4
Compressibility oil
Co*10
1.250
2.658
Compressibility factor gas
Z
0.9998
0.8755
Viscosity oil
o
1.203
0.398
Viscosity gas
g
0.0130
0.0224
Thermal expansion (Tres)
Ct *10
1.243
pres abs
284 bar
1.7182 m/m
1.6261 m/m
m/Sm
205.88 Sm/m
198.00 Sm/m
1.658 1/bar
0.437 mPas
mPas
1/C
ST
835.2 kg/m
n.a ppm
n.a. 1/bar
p0 abs
pb abs pres abs
14.7 3364.9 4119.1 psia
Bod
1.0682 1.7441 1.7182 bbl/bbl
Bof
1.0682
1.652 1.6261 bbl/bbl
Bg
1.3577 0.00515 0.00441 ft/scf
Rsd
0 1155.98 1155.98 scf/bbl
Rsf
0 1111.73 1111.73 scf/bbl
5
Co*10
0.086
0.183
0.114 1/psi
Z
0.9998 0.8755
o
1.203
0.398
0.437 mPas
g
0.0130 0.0224
mPas
Ct *10 0.691
1/F
PR20060025
ST
38.4 API
n.a. ppm
n.a. 1/psi
18 von 31
p abs
bar
301
284
271
241
235
232
211
181
151
121
91
61
31
11
1
PR20060025
Bod
m/m
1.7115
1.7182
1.7238
1.7374
1.7407
1.7441
1.6777
1.5968
1.5251
1.4595
1.3995
1.3428
1.2793
1.2142
1.0682
Bof
m/m
1.6194
1.6261
1.6317
1.6453
1.6486
1.6520
1.5940
1.5251
1.4653
1.4117
1.3637
1.3189
1.2673
1.2102
1.0682
Rsd
Nm/m
205.88
205.88
205.88
205.88
205.88
205.88
183.90
155.88
130.64
107.62
86.08
65.46
43.99
25.32
0
Rsf
Nm/m
198.0
198.0
198.0
198.0
198.0
198.0
176.7
149.7
125.5
103.5
83.0
63.4
43.0
25.0
0.0
Bt
m/m
1.7115
1.7182
1.7238
1.7374
1.7407
1.7441
1.7998
1.9185
2.1073
2.4209
2.9898
4.1953
7.9508
22.7410
278.0361
Co*104
1/bar
Bg
m/m
2.658
2.486
2.256
2.041
1.860
1.723
1.628
1.502
1.373
1.250
0.8755
0.8630
0.8512
0.8498
0.8611
0.8839
0.9162
0.9556
0.9848
0.9980
0.00515
0.00555
0.00638
0.00764
0.00966
0.01319
0.02039
0.04185
0.12153
1.35770
o
mPas
0.451
0.437
0.426
0.403
0.399
0.398
0.425
0.471
0.533
0.601
0.678
0.762
0.870
1.028
1.203
g
Pas
26.43
25.49
24.75
23.00
22.71
22.42
21.24
19.50
17.85
16.35
15.09
14.09
13.37
13.05
12.95
19 von 31
p abs
psia
4365.6
4119.1
3930.5
3495.4
3408.4
3364.9
3060.3
2625.2
2190.1
1755.0
1319.8
884.7
449.6
159.5
14.5
PR20060025
Bod
bbl/bbl
1.7115
1.7182
1.7238
1.7374
1.7407
1.7441
1.6777
1.5968
1.5251
1.4595
1.3995
1.3428
1.2793
1.2142
1.0682
Bof
bbl/bbl
1.6194
1.6261
1.6317
1.6453
1.6486
1.6520
1.5940
1.5251
1.4653
1.4117
1.3637
1.3189
1.2673
1.2102
1.0682
Rsd
scf/bbl
1155.8
1155.8
1155.8
1155.8
1155.8
1155.8
1032.4
875.1
733.4
604.2
483.3
367.5
247.0
142.1
0.0
Rsf
scf/bbl
1111.6
1111.6
1111.6
1111.6
1111.6
1111.6
992.2
840.7
704.7
581.2
466.0
356.0
241.2
140.2
0.0
Bt
bbl/bbl
1.7115
1.7182
1.7238
1.7374
1.7407
1.7441
1.7998
1.9185
2.1073
2.4209
2.9898
4.1953
7.9508
22.7410
278.0361
Co*105
1/psi
Bg
scf/scf
1.832
1.713
1.555
1.407
1.282
1.187
1.122
1.035
0.946
0.861
0.8755
0.8630
0.8512
0.8498
0.8611
0.8839
0.9162
0.9556
0.9848
0.9980
0.00515
0.00555
0.00638
0.00764
0.00966
0.01319
0.02039
0.04185
0.12153
1.35770
o
mPas
0.451
0.437
0.426
0.403
0.399
0.398
0.425
0.471
0.533
0.601
0.678
0.762
0.870
1.028
1.203
g
Pas
26.43
25.49
24.75
23.00
22.71
22.42
21.24
19.50
17.85
16.35
15.09
14.09
13.37
13.05
12.95
20 von 31
p abs
bar
211
181
151
121
91
61
31
11
1
N2
vol%
1.775
1.653
1.454
1.227
0.924
0.568
0.264
0.000
0.000
C1
vol%
79.383
80.108
80.530
80.457
79.448
76.492
67.359
44.448
2.206
C2
C3
iC4
nC4
vol%
vol% vol%
vol%
8.843 4.831 0.660 1.727
8.914 4.708 0.623 1.609
9.163 4.693 0.599 1.529
9.618 4.822 0.593 1.493
10.544 5.234 0.625 1.555
12.398 6.267 0.727 1.790
16.735 9.386 1.095 2.707
23.923 17.981 2.309 5.918
9.141 25.584 6.668 22.288
iC5
vol%
0.491
0.441
0.403
0.384
0.375
0.418
0.613
1.369
6.897
nC5
vol%
0.631
0.561
0.506
0.467
0.459
0.502
0.731
1.646
9.289
C6
vol%
0.515
0.442
0.379
0.333
0.308
0.324
0.449
0.993
6.503
C7
vol%
0.575
0.482
0.399
0.338
0.304
0.304
0.406
0.881
6.326
C8
vol%
0.374
0.309
0.238
0.196
0.164
0.156
0.197
0.412
3.176
C9
vol%
0.153
0.127
0.098
0.070
0.058
0.051
0.057
0.115
1.043
C10+
p
vol%
psia
0.042 1682.4
0.024 1319.8
0.009 1029.8
0.003 739.7
0.002 449.6
0.002 232.1
0.002
14.5
0.006 159.5
0.880
14.5
iC5
mol%
0.511
0.459
0.421
0.401
0.392
0.436
0.638
1.412
6.942
nC5
mol%
0.665
0.591
0.534
0.493
0.485
0.530
0.769
1.716
9.349
C6
mol%
0.652
0.561
0.481
0.423
0.392
0.412
0.569
1.246
6.781
C7
mol%
0.735
0.616
0.511
0.432
0.389
0.389
0.519
1.115
6.863
C8
mol%
0.503
0.415
0.320
0.264
0.221
0.210
0.264
0.548
3.578
C9 C10+
p
mol% mol%
psia
0.208 0.057 3060.3
0.173 0.033 2625.2
0.133 0.013 2190.1
0.096 0.004 1755.0
0.080 0.002 1319.8
0.070 0.002 884.7
0.078 0.003 449.6
0.156 0.008 159.5
1.217 1.063
14.5
p abs
bar
211
181
151
121
91
61
31
11
1
N2
mol%
1.758
1.639
1.443
1.218
0.918
0.564
0.261
0.000
0.000
PR20060025
C1
mol%
78.699
79.498
79.989
79.960
78.966
75.983
66.731
43.632
2.089
C2
C3
iC4
nC4
mol%
mol% mol%
mol%
8.848
4.908 0.673 1.781
8.928
4.789 0.636 1.661
9.185
4.777 0.612 1.580
9.647
4.911 0.606 1.544
10.577
5.332 0.639 1.608
12.429
6.380 0.743 1.851
16.732
9.529 1.116 2.791
23.701 18.089 2.332 6.045
8.739 24.836 6.573 21.971
21 von 31
10
p0 abs
pb abs
1.01325
232 bar
Formation volume factor oil (DLP) Bod
1.0632
1.742 m/m
Formation volume factor gas (DLP) Bg
1.3190 0.00510 m/Sm
Gas oil ratio (DLP)
Rsd
0
193 Sm/m
4
Compressibility oil
Co*10
1.200
2.658 1/bar
Compressibility factor gas
Z
0.9807
0.8833
Viscosity oil
o
1.088
0.295 mPas
Viscosity gas
g
10.23
25.35 Pas
Thermal expansion (Tres)
Ct *10
1.243
1/C
Tab. 14 Reservoir fluid summary, experimental data, SI-units @ T=20 C
ST
835.2 kg/m
n.a ppm
n.a. 1/bar
p0 abs
pb abs
14.7 3364.9 psia
Bod
1.0632
1.742 bbl/bbl
Bg
1.3190 0.00510 ft/scf
Rsd
0
1149 scf/bbl
5
Co*10
1.200 0.1833 1/psi
Z
0.9807 0.8833
o
1.088
0.295 mPas
g
10.23 0.0224 Pas
Ct *10 1.243
1/F
PR20060025
ST
38.4 API
n.a. ppm
n.a. 1/psi
22 von 31
p abs
bar
232
211
181
151
121
91
61
31
11
1.013
Bod
m/m
1.7419
1.6804
1.6003
1.5275
1.4602
1.3972
1.3368
1.2744
1.2199
1.0632
Rsd
Sm/m
192.98
172.61
146.01
121.92
99.83
79.39
60.18
41.29
26.78
0.00
Bt
m/m
1.7419
1.7950
1.9045
2.0777
2.3669
2.8922
4.0107
7.4865
20.9242
255.6110
Co*104
1/bar
2.658
2.486
2.256
2.041
1.860
1.723
1.628
1.502
1.373
1.200
Z
0.8833
0.8709
0.8600
0.8578
0.8641
0.8787
0.9012
0.9318
0.9579
0.9807
Bg
m/Sm
0.00510
0.00562
0.00648
0.00774
0.00973
0.01316
0.02013
0.04095
0.11856
1.31903
o
mPas
0.295
0.318
0.355
0.398
0.449
0.510
0.585
0.685
0.791
1.088
g
Pas
25.35
23.26
20.61
18.42
16.67
15.28
14.15
13.10
11.94
10.23
p abs
psia
3364.7
3060.7
2624.7
2189.7
1754.7
1319.7
884.7
449.7
159.7
14.7
PR20060025
Bod
bbl/bbl
1.7419
1.6804
1.6003
1.5275
1.4602
1.3972
1.3368
1.2744
1.2199
1.0632
Rsd
scf/bbl
1148.7
1027.4
869.1
725.7
594.2
472.5
358.2
245.8
159.4
0.0
Bt
bbl/bbl
1.742
1.795
1.905
2.078
2.368
2.893
4.012
7.491
20.938
255.786
Co*105
1/psi
1.833
1.714
1.556
1.408
1.283
1.188
1.123
1.036
0.947
0.828
Z
0.8833
0.8709
0.8600
0.8578
0.8641
0.8787
0.9012
0.9318
0.9579
0.9807
Bg
ft/SCF
0.0048
0.00530
0.00611
0.00730
0.00918
0.01241
0.01899
0.03862
0.11182
1.24402
o
mPas
0.295
0.318
0.355
0.398
0.449
0.510
0.585
0.685
0.791
1.088
g
Pas
25.35
23.26
20.61
18.42
16.67
15.28
14.15
13.10
11.94
10.23
23 von 31
p [bar]
C1
C2
C3
PS-1
PS-2
PS-3
PS-4
PS-5
PS-6
PS-7
3046
67.311
12.612
8.038
2.655
1.655
4.790
2.154
0.639
0.128
0.018
2610
68.717
12.921
8.136
2.448
1.518
4.154
1.632
0.405
0.064
0.005
2175
69.634
13.320
8.321
2.258
1.395
3.583
1.211
0.245
0.030
0.001
1740
69.818
13.910
8.696
2.111
1.301
3.114
0.892
0.144
0.013
0.000
1305
68.799
14.873
9.466
2.047
1.260
2.796
0.669
0.084
0.005
0.000
870
65.455
16.578
11.152
2.163
1.331
2.728
0.538
0.052
0.002
0.000
435
55.952
19.806
15.702
2.859
1.766
3.336
0.538
0.039
0.001
0.000
145
35.193
22.575
26.423
5.434
3.380
6.089
0.855
0.050
0.001
0.000
0
3.453
5.972
20.657
20.512
13.459
30.855
4.841
0.246
0.005
0.000
1305
79.729
12.084
5.624
0.975
0.511
0.900
0.162
0.015
0.001
0.000
870
76.980
13.670
6.725
1.045
0.548
0.891
0.132
0.009
0.000
0.000
435
69.311
17.201
9.973
1.455
0.765
1.148
0.139
0.007
0.000
0.000
145
50.376
22.656
19.392
3.197
1.692
2.420
0.256
0.011
0.000
0.000
0
8.424
10.215
25.842
20.566
11.486
20.907
2.468
0.092
0.001
0.000
p [bar]
C1
C2
C3
PS-1
PS-2
PS-3
PS-4
PS-5
PS-6
PS-7
PR20050057
3046
80.287
10.547
4.916
1.301
0.690
1.587
0.537
0.117
0.017
0.001
2610
80.798
10.651
4.905
1.183
0.624
1.357
0.401
0.073
0.008
0.000
2175
81.022
10.866
4.964
1.080
0.568
1.158
0.294
0.044
0.004
0.000
1740
80.783
11.284
5.159
1.004
0.526
1.001
0.216
0.026
0.002
0.000
24 von 31
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
1.E+02
exp C1
exp C2
exp C3
1.E+01
exp C4
exp C5
exp PS-1
exp PS-2
1.E+00
calc C1
calc C2
calc C3
calc C4
1.E-01
calc C5
calc PS-1
calc PS-2
1.E-02
The comparison of the composition of the associated gas (Fig. 12) shows a
good agreement between experiment and calculation. Differences occur with the
components C4, C5 and PS-2. But note, the scale of the concentration is
logarithmic. The accuracy of the experimental gas analyses decreases with
higher carbon numbers.
PR20050055
25 von 31
10.1
The software applied here was PVTP from Petroleum Experts. The PengRobinson EOS with non-zero binary interaction parameters was employed.
Specific parameters are needed for setting up the EOS. They are listed in Tab.
21.
Tab. 21 Parameters of components and pseudo components for EOS
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
psc1
psc2
psc3
psc4
psc5
mol%
44.90
8.55
6.80
5.14
3.02
9.76
8.53
5.76
4.76
2.80
10.2
Tc
K
190.7
305.4
369.8
486.0
496.1
551.3
631.0
711.8
793.7
892.9
pc
bar
46.41
48.84
42.57
29.54
30.88
30.21
23.91
18.62
14.32
8.28
0.011
0.099
0.153
0.366
0.298
0.294
0.406
0.542
0.713
0.972
Vc
M
m/kmol kg/kmol
0.099
16.04
0.148
30.10
0.203
44.10
0.415
58.40
0.402
72.15
0.430
101.5
0.559
144.2
0.742
206.8
0.979
301.5
1.528
556.6
Tb
K
111.6
184.6
231.1
333.0
333.0
370.4
445.1
526.7
616.3
773.1
Zc
rel
0.2905
0.2854
0.2810
0.3031
0.3006
0.2836
0.2544
0.2336
0.2125
0.1704
0.4150
0.5460
0.5850
0.6209
0.6529
0.7295
0.7792
0.8211
0.8602
0.9177
Variations of GOR
If one assumes that the GOR at the surface is subject to errors, looking at the
effect on the PVT parameters is of interest to see what effect a wrong reading
can have. The zero case is the one that represents the actual experimental
data (Tab. 23). A 10% higher GOR (plus case, Tab. 24) and a 10% lower GOR
(minus case, Tab. 22Tab. 1) was investigated. As a consequence of varying
GOR the saturation pressure is also subject to variation. For each PVT parameter
the variations can be found in Fig. 13-Fig. 18. The EOS software does not
compute the oil compressibility, therefore no variation is tabulated or displayed.
Tab. 22 Lower GOR (minus case)
p
bar
242
232
211
181
151
121
91
61
31
11
1.01325
PR20050055
Bo
m/m
1.8194
1.7878
1.7208
1.6347
1.5569
1.4855
1.4190
1.3554
1.2898
1.2323
1.0638
Rs
Sm/m
214.08
203.62
181.72
153.45
127.99
104.78
83.40
63.39
43.75
28.60
0.00
o
mPas
0.272
0.281
0.304
0.341
0.383
0.433
0.493
0.566
0.664
0.768
1.074
Bg
m/Sm
0.00517
0.00561
0.00645
0.00772
0.00970
0.01312
0.02009
0.04090
0.11854
1.31851
Zg
g
Pa.s
Bt
1.819
0.8808 25.67
1.842
0.8681 23.47
1.902
0.8571 20.74
2.026
0.8549 18.50
2.221
0.8615 16.71
2.546
0.8764 15.29
3.134
0.8993 14.15
4.383
0.9303 13.08
8.256
0.9568 11.89 23.218
0.9803 103.88 283.325
Co
1/bar
3.020
2.924
2.735
2.482
2.245
2.046
1.895
1.791
1.652
1.510
1.320
26 von 31
pabs
bar
232
211
181
151
121
91
61
31
11
1.013
Bo
m/m
1.7419
1.6804
1.6003
1.5275
1.4602
1.3972
1.3368
1.2744
1.2199
1.0632
Rs
Sm/m
192.98
172.61
146.01
121.92
99.83
79.39
60.18
41.29
26.78
0.00
o
mPas
0.295
0.318
0.355
0.398
0.449
0.510
0.585
0.685
0.791
1.088
Bg
m/Sm
0.00510
0.00562
0.00648
0.00774
0.00973
0.01316
0.02013
0.04095
0.11856
1.31903
Zg
o
mPas
0.272
0.281
0.304
0.341
0.383
0.433
0.493
0.566
0.664
0.768
1.074
Bg
m/Sm
Zg
g
Pa.s
0.00517
0.00561
0.00645
0.00772
0.00970
0.01312
0.02009
0.04090
0.11854
1.31851
0.8808
0.8681
0.8571
0.8549
0.8615
0.8764
0.8993
0.9303
0.9568
0.9803
25.67
23.47
20.74
18.50
16.71
15.29
14.15
13.08
11.89
10.39
0.8833
0.8709
0.8600
0.8578
0.8641
0.8787
0.9012
0.9318
0.9579
0.9807
g
Pa.s
25.35
23.26
20.61
18.42
16.67
15.28
14.15
13.10
11.94
10.23
Bt
1.742
1.795
1.904
2.078
2.367
2.892
4.011
7.487
20.924
255.611
Co
1/bar
2.658
2.486
2.256
2.041
1.86
1.723
1.628
1.502
1.373
1.2
p
bar
242
232
211
181
151
121
91
61
31
11
1.013
PR20050055
Bo
m/m
1.8194
1.7878
1.7208
1.6347
1.5569
1.4855
1.4190
1.3554
1.2898
1.2323
1.0638
Rs
Sm/m
214.08
203.62
181.72
153.45
127.99
104.78
83.40
63.39
43.75
28.60
0.00
Bt
1.819
1.842
1.902
2.026
2.221
2.546
3.134
4.383
8.256
23.218
283.325
Co
1/bar
3.020
2.924
2.735
2.482
2.245
2.046
1.895
1.791
1.652
1.510
1.320
27 von 31
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
zero case
1.3
minus case
plus case
1.2
1.1
1.0
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
200
150
100
zero case
minus case
plus case
50
0
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
PR20050055
28 von 31
1.0
0.8
zero case
minus case
plus case
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
175
200
225
250
25
50
75
100
125
150
225
250
1.E+01
1.E+00
zero case
1.E-01
minus case
plus case
1.E-02
1.E-03
PR20050055
29 von 31
0.98
0.96
zero case
0.94
minus case
plus case
0.92
0.90
0.88
0.86
0.84
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
225
250
26.0
21.0
16.0
zero case
11.0
minus case
plus case
6.0
1.0
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
PR20050055
30 von 31
11
Summary
The task of normalizing the existing PVT data could be achieved. All points of
the scope of work were covered. The data of all 4 PVT reports lead to the
conclusion that
o The reservoir fluids of the samples taken have the same composition.
o An analysis led to the identification of some outliers.
o A description of the phase behaviour with an EOS through 10 component
groups is possible and will provide the basis for a fast compositional
simulation.
o Variations in the surface GOR were calculated successfully.
PR20050055
31 von 31