From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For the process that uses water as a carrier, see Water jet cutter. Abrasive jet machining (AJM), also known as abrasive micro-blasting, pencil blasting and micro-abrasive blasting, [1] is an abrasive blasting machining process that uses abrasivespropelled by a high velocity gas to erode material from the workpiece. Common uses include cutting heat-sensitive, brittle, thin, or hard materials. Specifically it is used to cut intricate shapes or form specific edge shapes. [2][3][4]
Contents [hide] 1 Process o 1.1 Equipment 2 Advantages and disadvantages 3 References Process[edit] Material is removed by fine abrasive particles, usually about 0.001 in (0.025 mm) in diameter, driven by a high velocity fluid stream; common gases are air or inert gases. Pressures for the gas range from 25 to 130 psig (170900 kPag) and speeds can be as high as 300 m/s. [2][3]
Equipment[edit] AJM machines are usually self-contained bench-top units. First it compresses the gas and then mixes it with the abrasive in a mixing chamber. The gas passes through a convergent-divergentnozzle before entering the mixing chamber, and then exits through a convergent nozzle. The nozzle can be hand held or mounted in a fixture for automatic operations. [2][3]
Nozzles must be highly resistant to abrasion and are typically made of tungsten carbide or synthetic sapphire. For average material removal, tungsten carbide nozzles have a useful life of 12 to 30 hours, and sapphire nozzles last about 300 hours. The distance of the nozzle from the workpiece affects the size of the machined area and the rate of material removal. [3]
Grit size and orifice diameters for various abrasive materials [3]
This article contains a pro and con list. Please help improve it by integrating both sides into a more neutral presentation. (November 2012) The main advantages are its flexibility, low heat production, and ability to machine hard and brittle materials. Its flexibility owes from its ability to use hoses to transport the gas and abrasive to any part of the workpiece. [3][4]
One of the main disadvantages is its slow material removal rate; for this reason it is usually used as a finishing process. Another disadvantage is that the process produces a tapered cut. [3][4]
References[edit] 1. Jump up^ Applications, archived from the original on 03-04-2010, retrieved 09-02-2010. 2. ^ Jump up to: a
b
c Boothroyd, Geoffrey; Knight, Winston A. (1989), Fundamentals of machining and machine tools (2nd ed.), Marcel Dekker, pp. 478479, ISBN 978-0-8247-7852-1. 3. ^ Jump up to: a
b
c
d
e
f
g Todd, Robert H.; Allen, Dell K.; Alting, Leo (1994), Manufacturing Processes Reference Guide, Industrial Press Inc., pp. 25, ISBN 0-8311-3049-0. 4. ^ Jump up to: a
b
c Chastagner, Matthew W.; Shih, Albert J. (2007), "ABRASIVE JET MACHINING FOR EDGE GENERATION", Transactions of NAMRI/SME 35: 359366. Categories: Abrasive blasting Industrial processes Machining Navigation menu Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history
Main page Contents Featured content Current events Random article Donate to Wikipedia Wikimedia Shop Interaction Help About Wikipedia Community portal Recent changes Contact page Tools Print/export This page was last modified on 29 January 2014 at 13:51. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Developers Mobile view
Non Traditional Machining Jagadeesha T, Assistant Professor. MED, National In stitute of Technology, Calicut ABRASIVE JET MACHINING Definition: In abrasive jet machining, a focused stream of abra sive particles, carried by high pressure air or gas is made to impinge on the work surface through a nozzle and the work material is made to impinge on the work surfac e through a nozzle and work material is removed by erosion by high velocity abr asive particles. Process: In Abrasive jet machining abrasive particles are ma de to impinge on work material at high velocity. Jet of abrasive particles is carried by carrier gas or air. The high velocity stream of abrasives is generated by conver ting pressure energy of carrier gas or air to its Kinetic energy and hence high vel ocity jet. Nozzles directs abrasive jet in a controlled manner onto work material. The high velocity abrasive particles remove the material by micro-cutting action as well as brittle fracture of the work material. This is a process of removal of material by impact erosion through the action of concentrated high velocity stream of grit abrasives entrained in high velocity gas stream. AJM is different from shot or sand blasting , as in AJM, finer abrasive grits are used and parameters can be controlled more effectiv ely providing better control over product quality. In AJM, generally, the abrasive particles of around 50 microns grit size would impinge on the work material at velocity of 200 m/s from a nozzle of ID 0.5mm with a stand off distance of around 2mm. The kinetic ene rgy of the abrasive particles would sufficient to provide material removal due to brittle fracture of the work piece or even micro cutting by the abrasives. Physics of the Process:
Fine particles (0.025mm) are accelerated in a gas s tream
The particle are directed towards the focus of mach ining
As the particles impact the surface, it causes a mi cro fracture, and gas carries fractured particles away
Brittle and fragile work better Non Traditional Machining Jagadeesha T, Assistant Professor. MED, National In stitute of Technology, Calicut Equipment: A schematic layout of AJM is shown above. The gas s tream is then passed to the nozzle through a connecting hose. The velocity of t he abrasive stream ejected through the nozzle is generally of the order of 330 m/sec. Abrasive jet Machining consists of 1. Gas propulsion system 2. Abrasive feeder 3. Machining Chamber 4. AJM Nozzle 5. Abrasives Gas Propulsion System Supplies clean and dry air. Air, Nitrogen and carbo n dioxide to propel the abrasive particles. Gas may be supplied either from a compre ssor or a cylinder. In case of a compressor, air filter cum drier should be used to avoid water or oil contamination of abrasive powder. Gas should be non-toxic, cheap, ea sily available. It should not excessively spread when discharged from nozzle into atmosphere. The propellant consumption is of order of 0.008 m 3 /min at a nozzle pressure of 5 bar and abrasive flow rate varies from 2 to 4 gm/min for fine machin ing and 10 to 20 gm/min for cutting operation. Abrasive Feeder. Required quantity of abrasive particles is supplied by abrasive feeder. The filleted propellant is fed into the mixing chamber where in abrasive particles are fed through a sieve. The sieve is made to vibrate at 50-60 Hz a nd mixing ratio is controlled by the amplitude of vibration of sieve. The particles are propelled by carrier gas to a mixing chamber. Air abrasive mixture moves further to nozzle. The nozzle imparts high velocity to mixture which is directed at work piece surface. Non Traditional Machining Jagadeesha T, Assistant Professor. MED, National In stitute of Technology, Calicut Machining chamber It is well closed so that concentration of abrasive particles around the working chamber does not reach to the harmful limits. Machi ning chamber is equipped with vacuum dust collector. Special consideration should be given to dust collection system if the toxic material (like beryllium) are b eing machined. AJM nozzle AJM nozzle is usually made of tungsten carbide or s apphire ( usually life 300 hours for sapphire , 20 to 30 hours for WC) which has res istance to wear. The nozzle is made of either circular or rectangular cross sectio n and head can be head can be straight, or at a right angle. It is so designed t hat loss of pressure due to the bends, friction etc is minimum possible. With increase in wear of a nozzle, the divergence of jet stream increases resulting in more stray cuttin g and high inaccuracy. Non Traditional Machining Jagadeesha T, Assistant Professor. MED, National In stitute of Technology, Calicut ABRASIVES Aluminum oxide (Al 2 O 3 ) Silicon carbide (SiC) Glass beads, crushed glass and sodium bicarbonate are some of abrasives used in AJM. Sele ction of abrasives depends on MRR , type of work material , machining accuracy. Abrasives Grain Sizes Application Aluminum oxide(Al 2 O 3 ) 12, 20, 50 microns Good for cleaning, cutting and deburring Silicon carbide (SiC) 25,40 micron Used for simila r application but for hard material Glass beads 0.635 to 1.27mm Gives matte finish Dolomite 200 mesh Etching and polishing Sodium bi carbonate 27 micros Cleaning, deburring and cutting of soft material Light finishing below 50 0 C Process parameters For successful utilization of AJM process, it is ne cessary to analyze the following process criteria. 1. Material removal rate 2. Geometry and surface finish of work piece 3. wear rate of the nozzle However, Process criteria are generally influenced by the process parameters as enumerated below:
Abrasives a) material Al 2 O 3 SiC Glass beads Crushed glass Sodium bi carbonate b) shape irregular/regular c) Size 10 to 50 microns d) Mass flow 2-20 gm/min
Carrier Gas a) Composition Air, CO2, N2 b) Density 1.3 kg/m 3 c) Velocity - 500 to 700 m/s d) Pressure - 2 to 10 bar e) Flow rate - 5 to 30 microns
Abrasive Jet b) Velocity - 100 to 300 m/s c) Mixing ratio Volume flow rate of abrasives/Volume flow rate of gas d) Stand off distance SOD- 0.5 to 15mm. e) Impingement angle 60 to 90 deg. Non Traditional Machining Jagadeesha T, Assistant Professor. MED, National In stitute of Technology, Calicut
Nozzle a) Material WC/Sapphire b) Diameter 0.2 to 0.8 mm c) Life 300 hours for sapphire, 20 to 30 hours for W C Process capability 1. Material removal rate 0.015 cm 3 /min 2. Narrow slots 0.12 to 0.25mm
0.12mm 3 Surface finish -0.25 micron to 1.25 micron 4 Sharp radius up to 0.2mm is possible 5. Steel up to 1.5mm ,Glass up to 6.3mm is possible to cut 6. Machining of thin sectioned hard and brittle mat erials is possible. Applications 1. This is used for abrading and frosting glass more e conomically as compared to etching or grinding 2. Cleaning of metallic smears on ceramics, oxides on metals, resistive coating etc. 3. AJM is useful in manufacture of electronic devices , drilling of glass wafers, de burring of plastics, making of nylon and Teflon par ts permanent marking on rubber stencils, cutting titanium foils 4. Deflashing small castings, engraving registration n umbers on toughened glass used for car windows 5. Used for cutting thin fragile components like germa nium, silicon etc. 6. Register treaming can be done very easily and micro module fabrication for electrical contact , semiconductor processing can a lso be done effectively. 7. Used for drilling , cutting , deburring etching and polishing of hard and brittle materials. 8. Most suitable for machining brittle and heat sensit ive materials like glass, quartz, sapphire , mica , ceramics germanium , silicon and gallium. 9. It is also good method for deburring small hole lik e in hypodermic needles and for small milled slots in hard metallic components. Advantages 1. High surface finish can be obtained depending up on the grain sizes Particle size ( in microns) Surface roughness ( in microns) 10 0.152 to 0.203 25 to 27 0.355 to 0.675 50 0.965 to 1.27 2. Depth of damage is low ( around2.5 microns) 3. It provides cool cutting action, so it can machi ne delicate and heat sensitive material 4.Process is free from chatter and vibration as the re is no contact between the tool and work piece 5.Capital cost is low and it is easy to operate and maintain AJM. 6.Thin sections of hard brittle materials like germ anium, mica, silicon, glass and ceramics can be machined. 7.It has the capability of cutting holes of intrica te shape in hard materials. DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF ABRASIVE JET MACHINE
A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF
Bachelor of Technology
In
Mechanical Engineering
KRUSHNA PRASAD PRADHAN Roll 10503048
Department of Mechanical Engineering National Institute of Technology Rourkela 2009
DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF ABRASIVE JET MACHINE
A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF
Bachelor of Technology
In
Mechanical Engineering
By KRUSHNA PRASAD PRADHAN Roll 10503048
Under the guidance of
Dr. C. K. BISWAS
Department of Mechanical Engineering National Institute of Technology Rourkela 2009
National Institute of Technology Rourkela
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the thesis entitled DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF ABRASIVE JET MACHINE Submitted by MR. KRUSHNA PRASAD PRADHAN in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of Bachelor of technology Degree in Mechanical Engineering at the National Institute of Technology, Rourkela (Deemed University) is an authentic work carried out by him under my supervision and guidance. To the best of my knowledge, the matter embodied in the thesis has not been submitted to any other University / Institute for the award of any Degree or Diploma.
DATE: Dr. C. K. BISWAS
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROURKELA, 769008
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I deem it a privilege to have been a student of Mechanical Engineering streem in National Institute of Technology, Rourkela. I take this opportunity to express my gratitude to all those who motivated, encouraged and helped me in the project work. Im grateful to my supervisor, Prof.C.K. Biswas, for his kind support, guidance and encouragement throughout the project work, also for introducing to me this topic, which has been very interesting and has given us great insight to the future work on this area. We would like to take the chance to express our appreciation to our family members. Their continuous love and support gave us the strength for pursuing our dream. Special thanks to our friends and other members of the department for being so supportive and helpful in every possible way.
NIT Rourkela Krushna Prasad Pradhan May 11, 2009 Roll No 10503048 Department of Mechanical Engineering National Institute of Technology, Rourkela
CONTENTS TITLE PAGENO. PART ONE 4 1. Introduction 5 2. Equipment 5 3. Variables in Abrasive Jet Machine 7 4. Characteristics of different Variables 7 5. Advantages 8 6. Disadvantages 8 7. Application: 9 PART TWO 10 1. Literature survey: 11 PART THREE 17 1. DESIGN OF COMPONENTS 1. XY Table: 2. Ball Screw: 3. LMGuide or Linear Motion Guide Way: 4. Support Unit: 5. Nut Bracket:
18 18 22 25 30 31 1 | Page 2. ZAxis Assembly or Vertical Motion Module: 1. LM guide way: 2. Ball Screw & Support Unit 3. Nozzle 4. Limitations of Abrasive Jet nozzles: 32 33 34 35 37 3. TOTAL ASSEMBLY 38 4. Other Components i. FRL unit ii. Vibrating unit a. Abrasive container b. Cam 42 42 43 44 45 5. Cost Estimation 46 PART FOUR 47 1. Nozzle 48 2. Cam 49 3. Abrasive container 49 4. Vibrating assembly 50 CONCLUSION 51 BIBLIOGRAPHY & REFERENCES
52
2 | Page A BSTRACT Abrasive Jet Machining (AJM)isthe process ofmaterialremovalfroma workpiece by the application of a high speed stream of abrasive particles carried in a gas medium from a nozzle. The material removal process is mainly by erosion. The AJM will chiefly be used to cut shapes in hard and brittle materials like glass, ceramics etc. the machine will be automated to have 3 axes travel. The different components of AJM are Horizontal motion module (XY Table), Vertical motion module (Z motion), Vibrator, dehumidifier, Pressure Regulator, and Dust filter etc. The different components are selected after appropriate design calculations. In this project, a model of the Abrasive Jet Machine is designed using CAD packages like AutoCAD, CATIA etc taking into consideration of commercially available components. Care has been taken to use less fabricated components rather than directly procuring them, because, the lack of accuracy in fabricated components would lead to a diminished performance of the machine.
3 | Page P a r t O n e
I N T R O D U C T I O N
4 | Page 1.1 Introduction Abrasive Jet Machining (AJM)isthe removal ofmaterialfroma workpiece by the application of a high speed stream of abrasive particles carried in gas medium from a nozzle. The AJM process differs from conventional sand blasting in that the abrasive is much finer and the process parameters and cutting action are carefully controlled. The process is used chiefly to cut intricate shapes in hard and brittle materials which are sensitive to heat and have a tendency to chip easily. The process is also used for deburring and cleaning operations. AJM is inherently free from chatter and vibration problems. The cutting action is cool because the carrier gas serves as a coolant. 1.2 Equipment A schematic layout of AJM is shown in Fig1. The filtered gas, supplied under pressure to the mixing chamber containing the abrasive powder and vibrating at 50 c/s, entrains the abrasive particle and is the passed into a connecting hose. This abrasive and gas mixture emerges from a small nozzle at high velocity. The abrasive powder feed rate is controlled by the amplitude of vibration of the mixing chamber. A pressure regulator controls the gas flow and pressure. The nozzle is mounted on a fixture. Either the workpiece or the nozzle is moved by cams pantograph or other suitable mechanisms to control the size and shape of the cut. Hand operation is sometimes adequate to remove surface contaminations or in cutting where accuracy is not very critical. Dust removal equipment is necessary to protect the environment. Commercial bench mounted units including all controls, motion producing devices, and dust control equipment are available. 5 | Page
FIG1: SCHEMATIC LAYOUTOF ABRASIVE JET MACHINE
The major components are: 1. Air compressor.
2. Air filter.
3. Dehumidifier.
4. Pressure Gauge.
5. Pressure Regulator.
6. Vibrator or Mixer.
7. Nozzle.
8. Horizontal and Vertical motion module (for xyz motion).
9. Arrangement to hold the workpiece.
6 | Page 1.3 Variables inAbrasive Jet Machine: The variablesthatinfluence the rate ofmetalremoval and accuracy ofmachining in this process is:
1. Carrier gas
2. Types of abrasive
3. Size of abrasive grain
4. Velocity of abrasive jet
5. Flow rate of abrasive
6. Work material
7. Geometry, composition and material of nozzle
8. Nozzle work distance (stand off distance)
9. Shape of cut and operation type
1.3.1 Characteristics of different Variables:
Medium Air , CO2 ,N2 Abrasive SiC, Al2O3 (of size 20 to 50 ) Flow rate of abrasive 3 to 20 gram/min Velocity 150 to 300 m/min Pressure 2 to 8 kg/cm2 Nozzle size 0.07 to 0.40 mm Material of nozzle WC, Sapphire Nozzle life 12 to 300 hr 7 | Page Stand off distance 0.25 to 15mm(8mmgenerally) Work material Non Metalslike glass, ceramics, and granites. Metals and alloys of hard materials like germanium, silicon etc part application Drilling, cutting, deburring, cleaning
TABLE1 1.4 Advantages: 1. Ability to cut intricate holes shape in materials of any hardness and brittleness. 2. Ability to cut fragile and heat sensitive material without damage. 3. No change in microstructure as no heat is generated in the process. 4. Low capital cost. 1.5 Disadvantages: 1. Material removal rate is low and hence its application is limited. 2. Stray strings can occur and hence its application is limited. 3. Embedding of the abrasive in the workpiece surface may occur while machining softer material. 4. The abrasive material may accumulate at nozzle and fail the process if moisture is present in the air. 5. It cannot be used to drill blind holes. 8 | Page
1.6 Application: The major field of application of AJM process is in the machining of essentially brittle materials and heat sensitive materials like glass, quartz, sapphire, semiconductor materials, mica and ceramics. It is also used in cutting slot, thin sections, countering, drilling, deburring, for producing integrate shapes in hard and brittle materials. It is often used for cleaning and polishing of plastics nylon and Teflon components. Delicate cleaning, such as removal of smudges from antique documents, is also possible with AJM.
9 | Page P A R T T W O
L I T E R A T U R E S U R V E Y
10 | Page 2.1 Literature survey:
The literature study of Abrasive Jet Machine reveals that the Machining process was started a few decades ago. Till date there has been a through and detailed experiment and theoretical study on the process. Most of the studies argue over the hydrodynamic characteristics of abrasive jets, hence ascertaining the influence of all operational variables on the process effectiveness including abrasive type, size and concentration, impact speed and angle of impingement. Other papers found new problems concerning carrier gas typologies, nozzle shape, size and wear, jet velocity and pressure, standoffdistance (SOD), or nozzletipdistance (NTD). These papers express the overall process performance in terms of material removal rate, geometrical tolerances and surface finishing of work pieces, as well as in terms of nozzle wear rate. Finally, there are several significant and important papers which focus on either leading process mechanisms in machining of both ductile and brittle materials, or on the development of systematic experimentalstatistical approaches and artificial neural networks to predict the relationship between the settings of operational variables and the machining rate and accuracy in surface finishing. (Ref17) Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation of the formation and discharge process of an airwater flow in an abrasive waterjet (AWJ) head is presented by Umberto Prisco & Maria Carmina D'Onofrio. Numerical simulations have been conducted using the commercial code Fluent 6.3 by Ansys. Dynamic characteristics of the flow inside the AWJ head and downstream from the nozzle has been simulated under steady state, turbulent, twophase flow conditions. The final aim is to gain fundamental knowledge of the ultrahigh velocity flow dynamic features that could affect the quality of the jet, such as the velocity and pressure distributions in different parts of the AWJ head and at the outlet. 11 | Page (Ref20) Experiments have been performed on effect ofjet pressure, abrasive flow rate and work feed rate on smoothness ofthe surface produced by abrasive waterjetmachining of carbide of grade P25. Carbide of grade P25 is very hard and cannot be machined by conventional techniques. The abrasive used in investigations was garnet of mesh size 80. It was tried to cut carbide with low and medium level of abrasive flow rate, but the jet failed to cut carbide since it is too hard and very high level of energy is required. Minimum rate of abrasive flow that made it possible to cut carbide efficiently was 135 g min1 . With increase in jet pressure the surface becomes smoother due to higher kinetic energy of the abrasives. But the surface near the jet entrance is smoother and the surface gradually becomes rougher downwards and is the roughest near the jet exit. Increase in abrasive flow rate also makes the surface smoother which is due to the availability of higher number of cutting edges per unit area per unit time. Feed rate didnt show significant influence on the machined surface, but it was found that the surface roughness increases drastically near the jet entrance.
The study of the results of machining under various conditions approves that a commercial AJM machine was used, with nozzles of diameter ranging from 0.45 to 0.65 mm, the nozzle materials being either tungsten carbide or sapphire, both of which have high tool lives. Silicon carbide and aluminum oxide were the two abrasives used. Other parameters studied were nozzle tip distances (510 mm), spray angles (60 and 90) and pressures (5 and 7 bars) for materials like glass, ceramics, and electrodischarge machined (EDM) die steel. The holes drilled by AJM may not be circular and cylindrical but almost elliptical and 12 | Page bell mouthed.Highmaterialremovalrate conditions do not necessarily yield small narrow cleancut machined areas. (Ref16) Studies reveal that AJM is an attractive micromachining method for ceramic materials. The machinability during the AJM process can be compared to that given by the established models of solid particle erosion, in which the material removal is assumed to originate in the ideal crack formation system. However, it was clarified that the erosion models are not necessarily applicable to the AJM test results, because the relative hardness of the abrasive against the target material, which is not taken into account in the models, is critical in the micromachining process. No strength degradation took place for the AJM ceramic surfaces. This is attributed to the fact that radial cracks did not propagate downwards by particle impacts during the machining process. (Ref14) Abrasive WaterJet (AWJ) turning is a technology that still tries to find its niche field of application where it can be economically viable. But a particular application of AWJ turning has proved its technological and economical capability, i.e. profiling and dressing of grinding wheels. Starting from the theoretical considerations, the key operating parameters of AWJ turning are identified and included in a methodology to generate various profiles of grinding wheels by means of tangential movement of the jet plume. Roughing in single pass to concave/convex geometries (experimented depth of cuts < 30 mm), generation of thin walls/slots (thickness < 2 mm, depth > 430 mm) and intricate profile (e.g. succession of tight radii) on a variety of grinding wheels show the capability of AWJ turning to fulfill the requirements of this niche application. The machining process produces no heat and hence changes in microstructure or strength of the surface is unlikely. The air acts as a coolant and hence AJM process has a 13 | Page high potential as damage freemicromachiningmethod. The fracture toughness and hardness ofthe targetmaterials are critical parameters affecting thematerialremovalrate in AJM. However, their influence on the machinability varied greatly with the employed abrasives. In recent years abrasive jet machining has been gaining increasing acceptability for deburring applications. The influence of abrasive jet deburring process parameters is not known clearly. AJM deburring has the advantage over manual deburring method that generates edge radius automatically. This increases the quality of the deburred components. The process of removal of burr and the generation of a convex edge were found to vary as a function of the parameters jet height and impingement angle, with a fixed SOD. The influence of other parameters, viz. nozzle pressure, mixing ratio and abrasive size are insignificant. The SOD was found to be the most influential factor on the size of the radius generated at the edges. The size of the edge radius generated was found to be limited to the burr root thickness. (Ref15) Abrasive jet finishing combined with grinding gives rise to a precision finishing process called the integration manufacturing technology, in which slurry of abrasive and liquid solvent is injected to grinding zone between grinding wheel and work surface under no radial feed condition. The abrasive particles are driven and energized by the rotating grinding wheel and liquid hydrodynamic pressure and increased slurry speed between grinding wheel and work surface achieves micro removal finishing. Abrasive waterjet machines are becoming more widely used in mechanical machining. These machines offer great advantages in machining complex geometrical parts 14 | Page in almost anymaterial. This ability tomachine hardtomachine materials, combined with advancements in both the hardware and software used in waterjetmachining, has caused the technology to spread and become more widely used in industry. New developments in high pressure pumps provide more hydraulic power at the cutting head, significantly increasing the cutting performance of the machine. Analysis of the economic and technical has been done by researchers. Those technology advancements in applying higher power machining and intelligent software control have proven to significantly improve the overall performance of the abrasive waterjet machining operation, thus widening the scope of possible applications of this innovative and promising technology. (Ref21) Quality of the surface produced during abrasive water jet machining of aluminum has been investigated in recent years. The type of abrasive used was garnet of mesh size 80. The cutting variables were standoff distance of the nozzle from the work surface, work feed rate and jet pressure. The evaluating criteria of the surface produced were width of cut, taper of the cut slot and work surface roughness. It was found that in order to minimize the width of cut; the nozzle should be placed close to the work surface. Increase in jet pressure results in widening of the cut slot both at the top and at exit of the jet from the work. However, the width of cut at the bottom (exit) was always found to be larger than that at the top (at a standoff distance of 3 mm and the work feed rate of 15 mm min1). It was found that the taper of cut gradually reduces with increase in standoff distance and was close to zero at the standoff distance of 4 mm (at a jet pressure of 30 ksi and a work feed rate of 15 mm min1). The feed rate of the work should be kept within 40 mm min1 (at the jet pressure of 30 ksi and the standoff distance of 3 mm), because a feed rate beyond 40 mm min1 results in sharp increase in taper angle. The jet pressure does not 15 | Page show significantinfluence on the taper angle within the range of work feed and the stand off distance considered. Both standoff distance and the work feed rate show strong influence on the roughness of the machined surface. Hence standoff distance should be kept within 3 mm (at a jet pressure of 30 ksi and a work feed rate of 15 mm min1) and the work feed rate should be kept within 30 mm min1 (at a jet pressure of 30 ksi and a stand off distance of 3 mm) in order to have a good surface finish, since beyond those values of the parameters the roughness of the machined surface rises sharply. Increase in jet pressure shows positive effect in terms of smoothness of the machined surface. With increase in jet pressure, the surface roughness decreases (at a standoff distance of 3mm and work feed of 15 mm min1). This is due to fragmentation of the abrasive particles into smaller sizes at a higher pressure and due to the fact that smaller particles produce smoother surface. So within the jet pressure considered, the work surface is smoother near the top surface and gradually it becomes rougher at higher depths.
16 | Page P a r t T h r e e
D E S I G N O F C O M P O N E N T S
17 | Page 3.1 DESIGN OF COMPONENTS 3.1.1 X-Y Table: XY table is the most important part of the AJM over which the workpiece has to be kept and machined. The travel of XY table has been decided to be 400 x 350 mm. The different components of the XY table are: 1. LM guideway (2 pairs4 nos.) 2. Ball screw (2 nos.) 3. Support unit (2 fixed & 2 supported) 4. Nut bracket (2 nos.) 5. Couplings (2nos.) 6. Standard nuts and bolts. 7. Other components (to be manufactured in the lab). The XY table consists of two parts: (a) Upper table, (b) Lower table. The upper table is responsible for x movement and has a travel of 400 mm. The lower table has a travel of 350 mm and is responsible for the y motion of the workpiece. The different diagrams of the assembled views along with dimensions have been shown below.
FIG5: XY TABLE (SIDE VIEW) 21 | Page 3.1.2 Ball Screw: Ball screw issimilarto lead screw superficially butthe friction is greatly reduced in case of ball screws by inserting recirculating balls inbetween the screw thread and the nut. The thread profile is made circular and the nut thread has got a reverse shape which forms a spiral cavity inside which the balls move when the nut is rotated. Once the balls reach the end of the nut they are again recirculated by means of a return pipe. Ball screws can preloaded or nonpreloaded. The accuracy increases in case of preloaded type of ball screw as two sets of balls are pressed toward each other thereby making the radial clearance close to zero.
FIG6: RECIRCULATING BALL SCREW
22 | Page Screw length calculation: Travel of XY table has been decided to be 400 x 350mm. So screw of x axis ball screw: = 400mm + 200mm + 100mm (Travel) (Upper table breadth) (Allowance for bellows cover) = 700mm.
Screw length yaxis ball screw:
= 350mm + 200mm + 100mm (Travel) (Upper arrangement) (Bellows cover allowance) = 650mm. Commercial Ball screws are available from companies like (1) THK, (2) Grampus Impex Ltd., (3) Precision Bearing House, and (4) ABBA etc.
The specifications by companies that satisfy our requirement are: BNF2005 5 RR G2 850L 700 C7 (by THK Company) BNF model no. 20 screw shaft diameter 05 lead RR labyrinth seal attached G2 axial clearance grade 850L overall shaft length (in mm) 700 screw length C7 accuracy symbol 23 | Page SFI2005 C7 800 650 P0 SFI model no. (Single nut) 20 screw shaft diameter 05 lead C7 accuracy grade 800 total length 650 screw length P0 precision level
3.1.3 LM-Guide or Linear Motion Guide Way: LMGuide as the name suggests is used for highly precise linear motion. It can sustain high loads in any direction and hence can be mounted in any direction. The assembly contains a rail which guides a block on it. Inside the block, ball or roller are present which drastically reduces the frictional losses. So LMGuide is preferred in both industries and robotics to achieve specific functions.
FIG9: LM GUIDE ASSEMBLY
25 | Page Structure and Features: Balls roll in four rows of raceways precisionground on an LM rail and an LM block, and endplates incorporated in the LM block allow the balls to circulate. Since retainer plates hold the balls, they do not fall off even if the LM rail is pulled out (except models HSR 8, 10 and 12). Each row of balls is placed at a contact angle of 45so that the rated loads applied to the LM block are uniform in the four directions (radial, reverseradial and lateral directions), enabling the LM Guide to be used in all orientations. In addition, the LM block can receive a wellbalanced preload, increasing the rigidity in the four directions while maintaining a constant, low friction coefficient. With the low sectional height and the high rigidity design of the LM block, this model achieves highly accurate and stable linear motion. 4way equal load
FIG10: LOAD ON LM BLOCK Each row of balls is placed at a contact angle of 45so that the rated loads applied to the LM block are uniform in the four directions (radial, reverseradial and lateral directions), enabling the LM Guide to be used in all orientations and in extensive applications Highrigidity type Since balls are arranged in four rows in a wellbalanced manner, a large preload can be applied and the rigidity in four directions can easily be increased 26 | Page High durability Even under a preload or biased load, differential slip of balls does not occur. As a result, smooth motion, high wear resistance, and longterm maintenance of accuracy are achieved.
Rated Loads in All Directions
Model HSR is capable of receiving loads in all four directions: radial, reverseradial and lateral directions. The basic load ratings are uniform in the four directions (radial, reverseradial and lateral directions), and their actual values are provided in the dimensional table for HSR.
Equivalent Load
When the LM block of model HSR receives loads in the reverseradial and lateral directions simultaneously, the equivalent load is obtained from the equation below PEPRPLPT Where PE Equivalent load (N) Radial direction Reverseradial direction Lateral direction PR Radial load (N) 27 | Page PL Reverseradial load (N) PT Lateral load (N)
Advantage of LM Guide 1. Smooth movement with no clearance. 2. High running precision with ease. 3. High rigidity in all direction. 4. High permissible load rating. 5. High long term precision. 6. High speed operation. These combine to give rise 1. Low total cost. 2. High precision in machines incorporating the LM guide. 3. High productivity in the same. 4. Substantial energy saving. 5. High efficiency in machine design. 6. Simple maintenance.
28 | Page Rail length calculation: Length ofrailshould be approximately 50mmlargerthan that of corresponding ballscrew. Hence in X axis: rail length = 750 mm. Y axis: rail length = 700 mm. LM Guides are commercially available from companies like (1) THK, (2) Grampus Impex Ltd., (3) Precision Bearing House, and (4) ABBA etc.
The specification by companies that satisfy our requirement is: HSR 30 R2 SS C5 700L H II
HSR model no. 30R size specification 2 2 blocks per rail SS end seal + side seal C5 radial clearance 700L standard length H accuracy grade II 2 rails
29 | Page
FIG11: DIMENSIONS OF LM GUIDE 3.1.4 Support Unit:
FIG12: SUPPORT UNIT Support units are required for supporting the ballscrew ends. These are special kind of bearings which gives longer service life and better performance. They are of 2 types, 1. Fixed end support unit, 2. Supported end support unit. In fixed end the support unit acts like a thrust bearing and takes all the thrust given by the work load. In the supported end the support unit just acts like simple bearing. 30 | Page Various types ofsupported units are available commercially. They differmainly in themannerthey need to be fixed or bolted to a wall or ametal plate. Accordingly the fixing holes are provided on the face or sides of the support unit. Support units available commercially by THK are type EK for fixed side and FK for supported side.
FIG13: SUPPORT UNIT (DESIGN EF) 3.1.5 Nut Bracket: Nut bracket is used to bolt the ball screw nut with the work load platform. Following diagram shows a nut bracket along with a ball screw nut.
FIG14: NUT BTACKET 31 | Page 3.2 Z-Axis Assembly orVertical Motion Module: Vertical motionmodule isrequired for adjusting the nozzle height orstand off distance fromthe workpiece. When different operations are to be carried out, the set up time between operations can be eliminated if the nozzle tip is raised to a height more than 5 cm. At this distance the abrasive jet has negligible erosion effect on the workpiece. Hence the total Z motion has been decided to be 100mm. The different components of the Vertical motion module are: 1. LM guide way (1 no.) 2. Ball screw (1 no.) 3. Support unit (1 fixed & 1 supported) 4. Couplings (1 no.) 5. Nozzle (1 no.) 6. Standard nuts and bolts. 7. Other components (to be manufactured in the lab). The assembly view is shown in the next page.
32 | Page
Support unit Pipe holder Ballscrew LM Guide Nozzle holder Nozzle Support unit FIG15: VERTICAL MOTION MODULE
3.2.1 LM guide way: The LM Guide selected is of the type HSRYR. The special feature of HSRYR is that the tapped holes are present on the side of the LM Block and hence they can be attached to the load component from the side. 33 | Page
FIG16: LM Guide (type HSRYR) 3.2.2 Ball Screw & Support Unit The ball screw selected for the Z axis assembly is of the type BNT. The support units are EK and FK for fixed end and supported end respectively. The smaller space in the Zassembly doesnt allow for the use of a nut bracket for the ball screw nut. So the BNT type ball screw has been selected from THK catalogue as it has tapped holes on the nut itself which can be screwed to the load directly.
FIG17: BALL SCREW AND SUPPORT UNIT 34 | Page 3.2.3 Nozzle: The abrasive particles are directed into the work surface at high velocity through nozzles. Therefore, the material of the nozzle is subjected to great degree of abrasion wear and hence these are made of hard materials such as tungsten carbide or synthetic sapphire. Tungsten carbide nozzles are used for circular crosssections in the range of 0.120.8 mm diameter, for rectangular sections of size 0.08 x 0.05 to 0.18 x 3.8 mm and for square sections of size upto 0.7 mm. Sapphire nozzles are made only for circular crosssections. The size varies from 0.2 to 0.7 mm diameter. Nozzles are made with an external taper to minimize secondary effects due to ricocheting of abrasive particles. Nozzles made of tungsten carbide have an average life of 12 to 30 hours while nozzles of sapphire last for about 300 hour of operation when used with 27 m abrasive powder. The rate of material removal and the size of machined area are influenced by the distance of the nozzle from the workpiece. The abrasive particles from the nozzle follow a parallel path only for a short distance and then the jet flares resulting in the oversizing of the hole. It is observed that the jet stream is initially a cylinder for about 1.6 mm and then it flares into a cone of 7 included angle. The material removal rate initial increases with increase in the distance of the nozzle from the workpiece because of the acceleration of particles leaving nozzle. This increase is maximum up to a distance about 8 mm and then it steadily drops off because of increase in machining area for the same amount of abrasive and decrease in velocity of abrasive stream due to drag. 35 | Page FIG18: NOZZLE
Stand off distance
Nozzle tip Work piece FIG19: Abrasive action of particles
36 | Page 3.2.4 Limitations ofAbrasive Jetnozzles: Despite theirsimple design, abrasive jet nozzles can be troublesome attimes. There aremany designs, but they share the same problems:
1. Short life of an expensive wear part 2. Occasional plugging of mixing tube: Usually caused by dirt or large particles in abrasive. 3. Wear, misalignment, and damage to the jewel.
37 | Page 3.3 TOTAL ASSEMBLY The assembly drawing ofthe abrasive jetmachine can be represented asfollows. It can be noted that the components like air compressor, vibrator, dehumidifier, bellows cover and piping have not been shown in the drawing
FIG20: SIDE VIEW OF WHOLE ASSEMBLY 38 | Page
FIG21: AJM FRONT VIEW 39 | Page
FIG22: AJM TOP VIEW 40 | Page
FIG23: AJM ISOMETRIC VIEW 41 | Page 3.4 Other Components 3.4.1 FRL Unit (Dehumidifier): The FRL Unit (Air Filter Regulator Lubricator unit) which is otherwise called the moisture separator or dehumidifier is required for separating the moisture from air. Atmospheric air always contains some water vapour in it. As the air with high velocity is blown from the nozzle there is an abrupt rise in pressure which converts water vapour into moisture. The moisture makes the abrasive particles to agglomerate and this clogs the outlet of the Nozzle. To avoid this clogging moisture separator should be used before abrasive particles are mixed with compressed air. Different FRL Units are available commercially.
Inlet Outlet Circulation of Air Chemicalsfor separating moisture FIG24: FRL Unit 42 | Page 3.4.2 The VibratingUnit: Vibrating Unitis used formixing the air with the abrasive particles(Al2O3). The Abrasive particles are stored in a container through which air is flown. The particles are agitated by means of a cam and motor arrangement. The rotation of cam results in vibration in the abrasive container. The flow rate of abrasive materials can be controlled by manipulating the rotational speed of the motor. The abrasive container will have one inlet and one outlet for air passage and will be vertically suspended from a hinged joint. So the Vibrating Unit consists of following parts 1. Motor (Induction type) 2. Cam 3. Abrasive container
43 | Page Abrasive Container:
FIG 25: The Abrasive Container.
44 | Page Cam: Cam isfixed with shaft ofthe inductionmotor. The profile ofthe camistaken to be a circular one. The distance between two centers as shown in fig26 is 3mm. When the motor rotates; it makes the container to vibrate. Width of cam is 25mm.
FIG26: Cam
45 | Page 3.3.5 Approximate Cost Estimation: TABLE: 2 (Cost estimation) SL NO. NAME OF THE ITEM COST PER SINGLE PIECE NO. OF ITEMS REQUIRED TOTAL COST FOR THE ITEM 1 Recirculating ball screw X axis Y axis Z axis
Rs. 10,000.00 Rs. 7,000.00 Rs. 5,000.00
1 1 1
Rs. 22,00.00
2 Linear Motion guide ways X axis Y axis Z axis
Rs. 17,000.00 Rs. 14,000.00 Rs. 6,000.00
1 pair 1 pair 1
Rs. 37,000.00 3 Support Unit X axis ball screw Y axis ball screw Z axis ball screw
Rs. 3,000.00 Rs. 2,500.00 Rs. 2,500.00
2 2 2
Rs.16,000.00 4 FRL Unit Rs. 2,500.00 1 Rs. 2500.00 5 Vice Rs. 2,000.00 Rs. 2,000.00 6 Angles Rs. 1000.00 Rs. 1000.00 7 Other accessories Rs. 7,500.00 TOTAL Rs. 88,000.00
46 | Page P a r t F o u r
F A B R I C A T I O N A N D A S E M B L I N G
47 | Page 4.1 Nozzle: A standard MS cylindrical rod was cut into required length by power hacksaw. The external diameter was then brought to 16mm by turning it in lathe and then the tip was made by tapering one end by the same lathe. A blind hole of approximate depth 20mm was made on the planner face of the rod by means of a 12mm drill bit in a drilling machine. The end of the blind hole forms a shape of 118 degree taper because of the tool tip angle. Internal threading was made by 12mm tap. Then the tip of the nozzle was made by drilling it by a 0.74mm diameter drill bit to get approximate diameter of 1mm.
FIG 27: Nozzle
48 | Page 4.2 CAM: Mild steel of diameter 40mmwastaken asrawmaterialforthis operation. Atfirstturning was done in a lathe to bring down the diameter to 35mm. Then the required width (25mm) was cut by power hacksaw and both the cut faces were machined in a milling machine. Then a through hole was made by a 16mm drill bit in a drilling machine. The center offset was taken to be 3mm. 4.3 ABRASIVE CONTAINER: The abrasive container was made out of a hollow cylinder. Two iron plates were welded on both ends of the container. On the top plate two holes were drilled and iron pipes were fitted with these holes. The inlet iron pipe is longer so as to make more agitation of the abrasive particles. The outlet pipe is shorter. Both the pipes are clamped with nylon pipes which carries air through them. After removal of moisture by the FRL unit the compressed air goes to abrasive container through inlet, mixes with abrasive particle and then the air with abrasive particles moves through the nozzle to perform the machining action.
49 | Page 4.5 THE VIBRATORASSEMBLY: The angle section was welded with base plate by arc welding. A rod was welded with angle orienting it parallel with base plate. An induction motor was placed on the base plate by tighten with nut bolt. Cam was fixed with motor shaft. Then abrasive container was connected to the rod by means of the holder. The container is free to rotate around the rod.
FIG 28: The vibrator assembly
50 | Page CONCLUSION In this project a complete design ofthe Abrasive Jet Machine is given. The XYZmotion modules are designed taking in account of currently available components in the market. The designing and assembling of very large number of components was a tremendous task and was completed on time. However because of some parts couldnt be purchased the whole assembly was limited to drilling operation. The project can go beyond its current position and capabilities by employing automation into it. This can be done by using stepper motors or DC servo motors interfaced with standard PCI controllers or standalone controllers. 2D profiles can be converted into standard Gcodes and Mcodes and that can be sent to the machine to perform automated machining.
51 | Page Bibliography & References BOOKS 1. Production technology, HMT publication. 2. Elements of workshop technology, S K Hajra Choudhury, S K Bose, A K Hajra choudhury, Niranjan Roy, VolII, Media promoters and media publications 3. Modern machining process, S Pandey and H N Shah, S. Chand and co.
JOURNALS 12. Residual stress and tribological characteristics of ground surface after abrasive jet restricted by grinding wheel Authors: Liu, F., Gong, Y.D., Shan, Y.Q., Cai, G.Q. Publication: Journal of Northeastern University, Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 422425 March 2009. 13. Simulation and analysis of abrasive jet machining with wheel restriction in grinding Authors: Wang, W.S., Zhu, L.D., Yu, T.B., Yang, J.Y., Tang, L. Publication: Key Engineering Materials, Volume 389390, Pages 387391, 2009
52 | Page 14. Abrasive waterjetturningAn efficientmethod to profile and dress grinding wheels Authors: D.A. Axinte,J.P. Stepanian, M.C. Kong,J. McGourlay Publication: International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Volume 49, Issues 34, March 2009, Pages 351356 Date: Dec, 2008
15. Modeling and simulation for material removal in abrasive jet precision finishing with wheel as restraint. Authors: Li, C.H., Ding, Y.C., Lu, B.H. Publication: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics, ICAL 2008, Article number 4636666, Pages 28692873, 2008
16. Abrasive jet micromachining of planar areas and transitional slopes Authors: Ghobeity, A.; Spelt, J. K.; Papini, M. Publication: Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp. 055014. Publication Date: 01/ 05/2008
17. ThreeDimensional CFD Simulation of TwoPhase Flow Inside the Abrasive Water Jet Cutting Head Authors: Umberto Prisco; Maria Carmina D'Onofrio. Publication: International Journal of Computational Methods in Engineering Science and Mechanics 9 (5), pp. 300319 Publication Date: 01 September 2008 18. Machinability of glass by abrasive waterjet Authors: Zhu, H.T., Huang, C.Z., Wang, J., Lu, X.Y. and Feng, Y.X. Publication: International Journal of Materials and Product Technology, Vol. 31, No.1, pp.106112, 2008.
53 | Page 19. Surface evolutionmodelsfor abrasive jetmicromachining of holesin glass and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) Authors: Ghobeity, A.; Getu, H.; Papini, M.; Spelt, J. K. Publication: Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, Volume 17, Issue 11, pp. 21752185 (2007). Date: 11/2007
20. Surface Roughness of Carbides Produced by Abrasive Water Jet Machining Authors: Khan, Ahsan Ali; Awang, Mohd Efendee Bin; Annuar, Ahmad Azwari Bin Publication: Journal of Applied Science, vol. 5, Issue 10, p.17571761 Date: 06/2005
21. A Study on Abrasive Water Jet Machining of Aluminum with Garnet Abrasives. Authors: Khan, Ahsan Ali; Munajat, Noraziaty Bt.; Tajudin, Harnisah Bt. Publication: Journal of Applied Science, vol. 5, Issue 9, p.16501654 Date: 01/2005 22. Effect of workpiece properties on machinability in abrasive jet machining of ceramic materials Authors: M. Wakuda, Y. Yamauchi and S. Kanzaki Publication: Precision Engineering, Volume 26, Issue 2, April 2002, Pages 193198 23. An experimental study on the abrasive jet deburring of crossdrilled holes Authors: R. Balasubramaniam, J. Krishnan and N. Ramakrishnan Publication: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Volume 91, Issues 13, 30 June 1999, Pages 178182
24. A study on the shape of the surface generated by abrasive jet machining Authors: R. Balasubramaniam, J. Krishnan and N. Ramakrishnan Publication: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Volume 121, Issue 1, 14 February 2002, Pages 102106
54 | Page 55 | Page
25. Abrasive jet machining of glass at low temperature Authors: M. K. Muju and A. K. Pathak Publication: Journal of Mechanical Working Technology, Volume 17, August 1988, Pages 325332
26. An experimental study of abrasive jet machining Authors: A. P. Verma and G. K. Lal Publication: International Journal of Machine Tool Design and Research, Volume 24, Issue 1, 1984, Pages 1929
Explore
Upload Go Pro Login Signup Ads by safesaver. More Info | Hide These Ads Email Like Save Embed
1 /18 Share Ads by safesaver. More Info | Hide These Ads Related Abrasive water jet machining 93 views Like Fy3310631066 129 views Like phonetics 72 views Like Nanofinishing 1877 views Like Theoretical and graphical analysis of abrasivewater jetturning 74 views Like Final evaluating materialremoval 61 views Like N A ROBSON BROCHURE 727 views Like KMT Waterjet Systems Stone Cutting Presentation 5834 views Like KMT Waterjet Systems Metal Cutting Presentation 7894 views Like Waterjet cutting milling 127 views Like Blasting Cabinet byKrishna engineers 127 views Like WATER JET CUTTING 1929 views Like 37624 _advanced_machining_processes.mcgraw- hill_._2005.isbn0071453342_ 6500 views Like Ef25803806 190 views Like Final tech forum abrasives 181 views Like Cl34527530 434 views Like 8 cuft classic-blast-machine 427 views Like SandBlasting Products 184 views Like Asm metals handbook volume 5 surface engineering 1003 views Like N55 massarsky rev 268 views Like Effect of Temperature on Wear Rate of Si-Epoxy- Eglass Polymer composite Materia 60 views Like Afp sme-turbo-finish 378 views Like Analysis of abrasive jet machining parameters on mrr and kerf width of hard and 689 views Like Effect of the process parameters on the surface roughness during magnetic 220 views Like 15ap2 176 views Like Dental Materials: Properties & Manipulation, 10/e 1771 views Like Mesin sandblasting clemco 623 views Like Water jet cutting technology 2501 views Like Flow wintech presentation 350 views Like October 2013 f2 deburring 1 205 views Like Flow Water Jet Cutting Machine Supplier, Manufacturer, Ahmedabad 117 views Like Micromachining using an abrasive jet 855 views Like Investigations on Wear by Slurry Abrasion of Hardfaced Low Alloy Steel 310 views Like Water jet manual 229 views Like Follow Presentation of-abrasive-jet-machining by Amol Ranvare, Working at Student on J an 07, 2012 8,484 views DFDFF 1 comment 11 of 1 comment Manish Chander TANX.. ya its very helpful ... :) 1 year ago
Subscribe to comments Post Comment 2 Likes pranavas 11 months ago shivashree 11 months ago Presentation of-abrasive-jet-machining Presentation Transcript WHAT IS1. It is the material removal process where theABRASIVE JET MACHINING ? material is removed by high velocity stream of air/gas or water and An abrasive is small, hard particle having sharpabrasive mixture . High velocity jet is aimed at a surfaceedges and an irregular shape . under controller condition . Motion system Mixing tube Nozzle Pump Control system Abrasivedelivery system COMPONENTS OF ABRASIVE JETMACHINING2. 3. 1. ABRASIVE DELIVERY SYSTEMAuto abrasive delivery system has the capability of storing abrasive & delivery the abrasive to the bucket . Its works auto programming system by help of once measuring record & no adjustment or fine tuning system . High sensitive sensor gives extremely reliable & repeatable . The4. 2.CONTROL SYSTEM control algorithm that computes exactly how the feed rate should vary for a given geometry in a given material to make a precise Thepart . algorithm actually determines desired variation in the feed rate & the tool path to provide an extremely smooth feed rate . 5. Crankshaft3.PUMP & intensifier pump are mainly use in the The intensifier pump was the only pump capableabrasive jet machine . Crankshaft pumps are moreof reliably creating pressures high . efficient than intensifier pumps because they do not require a power robbing hydraulic system ultra high pressure & more stroke per minute . All abrasive jet systems use the same6. 4.NOZZLE basic two stage nozzle . First , water passes through a small diameter jewel orifice to form a narrow The abrasive particles arejet . accelerated by the moving stream of water & they pass into a long hollow cylindrical Generally two type of nozzleceramic mixing tube. use , right angle head & straight head . FIG. OF NOZZLE7. 8. The mixing tube is where the abrasive mixes5. MIXING TUBE with the The mixing tube should be replaced whenhigh pressure water . For maximum accuracy ,tolerances drop below acceptable levels . replace the mixing tube more frequently . 9. 6.MOTION SYSTEM In order to make precision parts , an abrasive jet system must have a precision x-y table and Tables fall into threemotion control system . Integrated Floor-mounted gantry systemsgeneral categories . Floor-mounted cantilever systemstable/gantry systems 10. High pressure water starts at the pump , and isWORKING PROCESS delivered through special high pressure Atplumbing to the nozzle . the nozzle , abrasive is introduced & as the abrasive/water mixture exits , cutting is Once the jet has exited the nozzle ,performed . the energy is dissipated into the catch tank , which is usually full of water & debris from previous cut . FIG . SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF AJM11. 12. Obtainable tolerances There are main features of AJM AJM FEATURES Stability of Accuracy of table Material thicknessMaterial to machine Control abrasive jettable Around MACHINE ASPECTS13. Speed Nozzle focus Acceleration Feed rate Inside cornercurves Hardness Pump pressurecutting & Software controllingthickness Power at the nozzlethe motion TYPES OF ABRASIVE14. Different types of abrasive are used in abrasiveMATERIALS jet machining like garnet , aluminum oxide , olivine , silica sand , Virtually any material can be cut by usingsilicon carbide ,etc . abrasive jet machining method , i.e harder materials like titanium to Abrasive particles must be hard ,high toughness,steel. irregular in shape & edges should be sharp . Extremely ADVANTAGES15. fast setup & There is only one No start hole requiredprogramming No heat generated in work Less vibration Low capital costtool Environmentally friendlypiece Low metal DISADVANTAGES16. Abrasive powder Due to stay cutting accuracy is affectedremoval rate Tapper is also a problemcannot be reused CONCLUSION17. The better performance , and the applications represented above statements confirm that ABRASIVE JET MACHINING is continue to expand The new softwares used to minimize time and. investments , there by making it possible for more manufacturers of precision parts to install AJM centers . Ads by safesaver. More Info | Hide These Ads Follow us on LinkedIn Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook Find us on Google+ Learn About Us About Careers Our Blog Press Contact Us Help & Support Using SlideShare SlideShare 101 Terms of Use Privacy Policy Copyright & DMCA Community Guidelines SlideShare on Mobile Pro & more Go PRO Enterprise Sales PRO Features Developers & API Developers Section Developers Group Engineering Blog Blog Widgets LinkedIn Corporation 2014 RSS Feed ENGLISH
Explore
Upload Go Pro Login Signup Ads by safesaver. More Info | Hide These Ads Email Like Save Embed
1 /18 Share Ads by safesaver. More Info | Hide These Ads Related Abrasive water jet machining 93 views Like Fy3310631066 129 views Like phonetics 72 views Like Nanofinishing 1877 views Like Theoretical and graphical analysis of abrasivewater jetturning 74 views Like Final evaluating materialremoval 61 views Like N A ROBSON BROCHURE 727 views Like KMT Waterjet Systems Stone Cutting Presentation 5834 views Like KMT Waterjet Systems Metal Cutting Presentation 7894 views Like Waterjet cutting milling 127 views Like Blasting Cabinet byKrishna engineers 127 views Like WATER JET CUTTING 1929 views Like 37624 _advanced_machining_processes.mcgraw- hill_._2005.isbn0071453342_ 6500 views Like Ef25803806 190 views Like Final tech forum abrasives 181 views Like Cl34527530 434 views Like 8 cuft classic-blast-machine 427 views Like SandBlasting Products 184 views Like Asm metals handbook volume 5 surface engineering 1003 views Like N55 massarsky rev 268 views Like Effect of Temperature on Wear Rate of Si-Epoxy- Eglass Polymer composite Materia 60 views Like Afp sme-turbo-finish 378 views Like Analysis of abrasive jet machining parameters on mrr and kerf width of hard and 689 views Like Effect of the process parameters on the surface roughness during magnetic 220 views Like 15ap2 176 views Like Dental Materials: Properties & Manipulation, 10/e 1771 views Like Mesin sandblasting clemco 623 views Like Water jet cutting technology 2501 views Like Flow wintech presentation 350 views Like October 2013 f2 deburring 1 205 views Like Flow Water Jet Cutting Machine Supplier, Manufacturer, Ahmedabad 117 views Like Micromachining using an abrasive jet 855 views Like Investigations on Wear by Slurry Abrasion of Hardfaced Low Alloy Steel 310 views Like Water jet manual 229 views Like Follow Presentation of-abrasive-jet-machining by Amol Ranvare, Working at Student on J an 07, 2012 8,484 views DFDFF 1 comment 11 of 1 comment Manish Chander TANX.. ya its very helpful ... :) 1 year ago
Subscribe to comments Post Comment 2 Likes pranavas 11 months ago shivashree 11 months ago Presentation of-abrasive-jet-machining Presentation Transcript WHAT IS1. It is the material removal process where theABRASIVE JET MACHINING ? material is removed by high velocity stream of air/gas or water and An abrasive is small, hard particle having sharpabrasive mixture . High velocity jet is aimed at a surfaceedges and an irregular shape . under controller condition . Motion system Mixing tube Nozzle Pump Control system Abrasivedelivery system COMPONENTS OF ABRASIVE JETMACHINING2. 3. 1. ABRASIVE DELIVERY SYSTEMAuto abrasive delivery system has the capability of storing abrasive & delivery the abrasive to the bucket . Its works auto programming system by help of once measuring record & no adjustment or fine tuning system . High sensitive sensor gives extremely reliable & repeatable . The4. 2.CONTROL SYSTEM control algorithm that computes exactly how the feed rate should vary for a given geometry in a given material to make a precise Thepart . algorithm actually determines desired variation in the feed rate & the tool path to provide an extremely smooth feed rate . 5. Crankshaft3.PUMP & intensifier pump are mainly use in the The intensifier pump was the only pump capableabrasive jet machine . Crankshaft pumps are moreof reliably creating pressures high . efficient than intensifier pumps because they do not require a power robbing hydraulic system ultra high pressure & more stroke per minute . All abrasive jet systems use the same6. 4.NOZZLE basic two stage nozzle . First , water passes through a small diameter jewel orifice to form a narrow The abrasive particles arejet . accelerated by the moving stream of water & they pass into a long hollow cylindrical Generally two type of nozzleceramic mixing tube. use , right angle head & straight head . FIG. OF NOZZLE7. 8. The mixing tube is where the abrasive mixes5. MIXING TUBE with the The mixing tube should be replaced whenhigh pressure water . For maximum accuracy ,tolerances drop below acceptable levels . replace the mixing tube more frequently . 9. 6.MOTION SYSTEM In order to make precision parts , an abrasive jet system must have a precision x-y table and Tables fall into threemotion control system . Integrated Floor-mounted gantry systemsgeneral categories . Floor-mounted cantilever systemstable/gantry systems 10. High pressure water starts at the pump , and isWORKING PROCESS delivered through special high pressure Atplumbing to the nozzle . the nozzle , abrasive is introduced & as the abrasive/water mixture exits , cutting is Once the jet has exited the nozzle ,performed . the energy is dissipated into the catch tank , which is usually full of water & debris from previous cut . FIG . SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF AJM11. 12. Obtainable tolerances There are main features of AJM AJM FEATURES Stability of Accuracy of table Material thicknessMaterial to machine Control abrasive jettable Around MACHINE ASPECTS13. Speed Nozzle focus Acceleration Feed rate Inside cornercurves Hardness Pump pressurecutting & Software controllingthickness Power at the nozzlethe motion TYPES OF ABRASIVE14. Different types of abrasive are used in abrasiveMATERIALS jet machining like garnet , aluminum oxide , olivine , silica sand , Virtuallsilicon carbide ,etc .y any material can be cut by using abrasive jet machining method , i.e harder materials like titanium to Abrasive particles must be hard ,high toughness,steel. irregular in shape & edges should be sharp . Extremely ADVANTAGES15. fast setup & There is only one No start hole requiredprogramming No heat generated in work Less vibration Low capital costtool Environmentally friendlypiece Low metal DISADVANTAGES16. Abrasive powder Due to stay cutting accuracy is affectedremoval rate Tapper is also a problemcannot be reused CONCLUSION17. The better performance , and the applications represented above statements confirm that ABRASIVE JET MACHINING is continue to expand The new softwares used to minimize time and. investments , there by making it possible for more manufacturers of precision parts to install AJM centers . Ads by safesaver. More Info | Hide These Ads Follow us on LinkedIn Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook Find us on Google+ Learn About Us About Careers Our Blog Press Contact Us Help & Support Using SlideShare SlideShare 101 Terms of Use Privacy Policy Copyright & DMCA Community Guidelines SlideShare on Mobile Pro & more Go PRO Enterprise Sales PRO Features Developers & API Developers Section Developers Group Engineering Blog Blog Widgets LinkedIn Corporation 2014 RSS Feed ENGLISH
Search
Forums Latest Topics Categories Submit your Article About Contact us FAQ Home Manufacturing Technology Unconventional Machining Processes Abrasive Jet Machining (AJM) Abrasive Jet Machining (AJM) Unconventional Machining Processes Add comments Jan 182013
Abrasive Jet Machining (AJM), also known as micro-abrasive blasting, is a mechanical energy based unconventional machining process used to remove unwanted material from a given workpiece. The process makes use of an abrasive jet with high velocity, to remove material and provide smooth surface finish to hard metallic workpieces. It is similar to Water Jet Machining (WJM). This article explains the construction and working of AJM listing its advantages, disadvantages and applications. The contents of this article are listed below: 1. Schematic Diagram 2. Construction 3. Working 4. Operations performed using AJM (Applications of AJM) 5. Advantages 6. Disadvantages Schematic Diagram of Abrasive Jet Machining: A simple schematic diagram of Abrasive Jet Machining (AJM) is shown below:
Construction of Abrasive Jet Machining (AJM): The constructional requirements of Abrasive Jet Machining (AJM) are listed and described below: 1. Abrasive jet: It is a mixture of a gas (or air) and abrasive particles. Gas used is carbon-di-oxide or nitrogen or compressed air. The selection of abrasive particles depends on the hardness and Metal Removal Rate (MRR) of the workpiece. Most commonly, aluminium oxide or silicon carbide particles are used. 2. Mixing chamber: It is used to mix the gas and abrasive particles. 3. Filter: It filters the gas before entering the compressor and mixing chamber. 4. Compressor: It pressurizes the gas. 5. Hopper: Hopper is used for feeding the abrasive powder. 6. Pressure gauges and flow regulators: They are used to control the pressure and regulate the flow rate of abrasive jet. 7. Vibrator: It is provided below the mixing chamber. It controls the abrasive powder feed rate in the mixing chamber. 8. Nozzle: It forces the abrasive jet over the workpiece. Nozzle is made of hard and resistant material like tungsten carbide. Working: Dry air or gas is filtered and compressed by passing it through the filter and compressor. A pressure gauge and a flow regulator are used to control the pressure and regulate the flow rate of the compressed air. Compressed air is then passed into the mixing chamber. In the mixing chamber, abrasive powder is fed. A vibrator is used to control the feed of the abrasive powder. The abrasive powder and the compressed air are thoroughly mixed in the chamber. The pressure of this mixture is regulated and sent to nozzle. The nozzle increases the velocity of the mixture at the expense of its pressure. A fine abrasive jet is rendered by the nozzle. This jet is used to remove unwanted material from the workpiece. For a good understanding of construction and working of AJM, refer the schematic diagram above. Operations that can be performed using Abrasive Jet Machining (AJM): The following are some of the operations that can be performed using Abrasive Jet Machining: 1. Drilling 2. Boring 3. Surface finishing 4. Cutting 5. Cleaning 6. Deburring 7. Etching 8. Trimming 9. Milling Advantages of Abrasive Jet Machining: Surface of the workpiece is cleaned automatically. Smooth surface finish can be obtained. Equipment cost is low. Hard materials and materials of high strength can be easily machined. Disadvantages of Abrasive Jet Machining: Metal removal rate is low In certain circumstances, abrasive particles might settle over the workpiece. Nozzle life is less. Nozzle should be maintained periodically. Abrasive Jet Machining cannot be used to machine soft materials. You may also Read: Classification of Unconventional Machining Processes based on Energy Used Unconventional Machining Processes Introduction and Classification Water Jet Machining (WJM) Process Parameters of Abrasive Jet Machining Bookmark, Email or Share this Page Share on favorites Share on email Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on print Share on gmail Share on stumbleupon Share on tumblr Share on pinterest_share Share on google More Sharing Services 17 Get Fresh Content from Mechteacher.com! Enter email address
Written by Surjeet S I am a mechanical engineering student, an engineering designer and an article writer. I am the editor-in-chief of mechteacher.com. Fluid Flow Process Parameters of Abrasive Jet Machining Get Fresh Content from Mechteacher.com! Enter email addre
Latest Articles How to assemble a universal joint [Tutorial] Parts of a Universal Joint Universal Joint An Introduction Knuckle Joint Introduction, Parts and Applications Spur Gear Advantages, Disadvantages & Applications Recent Comments Surjeet S on Kinematic Pair Definition and Types Ashley Lionell on Kinematic Pair Definition and Types hardik on Reheat Rankine Cycle Processes with h-s Diagram reygie palma on Beam Definition and Types reygie palma on Beam Definition and Types