The document is a QSPM matrix that evaluates two strategic alternatives for Hershey's: 1) creating fast track programs for developing new products from employee ideas and 2) forming new partnerships with non-profit organizations. It analyzes the alternatives based on internal strengths and weaknesses as well as external opportunities and threats. The matrix shows the alternative of creating fast track programs receives a higher total attractiveness score of 2.69 compared to 2.67 for partnerships. Therefore, the document recommends Hershey's pursue the fast track programs alternative.
The document is a QSPM matrix that evaluates two strategic alternatives for Hershey's: 1) creating fast track programs for developing new products from employee ideas and 2) forming new partnerships with non-profit organizations. It analyzes the alternatives based on internal strengths and weaknesses as well as external opportunities and threats. The matrix shows the alternative of creating fast track programs receives a higher total attractiveness score of 2.69 compared to 2.67 for partnerships. Therefore, the document recommends Hershey's pursue the fast track programs alternative.
The document is a QSPM matrix that evaluates two strategic alternatives for Hershey's: 1) creating fast track programs for developing new products from employee ideas and 2) forming new partnerships with non-profit organizations. It analyzes the alternatives based on internal strengths and weaknesses as well as external opportunities and threats. The matrix shows the alternative of creating fast track programs receives a higher total attractiveness score of 2.69 compared to 2.67 for partnerships. Therefore, the document recommends Hershey's pursue the fast track programs alternative.
Strategic Alternatives create fast track programs for developing new products from employee ideas new partnerships with non-profit organisation sales (AS) (TAS) (AS) (TAS) Strengths Brand recognition - Largest producer of chocolate in North America. - Consumer good will 0.10 1 0.10 2 0.20 2. Strategic Acquisitions 0.05 2 0.10 2 0.10 3. Human Resources - Employee empowerment - increase in employee benefits 0.07 4 0.28 1 0.07 4. Research and development - expand product line. - Premium line with high quality of dark chocolate. - Antioxidant will be emphasis in Hersheys product. 0.04 4 0.16 0 0 5. Hersheys involved actively in organization that involved environmental and charity. 0.04 2 0.08 4 0.16 6. Reduction of cost due to Hersheys closed their Reading Pennsylvania, plant in 2009, eliminating 300 jobs. 0.06 0 0 0 0 7. Reduction of 1,500 positions over next three-year period due to the global supply initiatives. 0.05 3 0.15 0 0 8. changing in product packaging have showed that lighter material and less waste. 0.05 3 0.15 1 0.05 9. Hersheys plant to close online gift business which featured seasonal products and gifts that could be personalized by consumer. 0.04 4 0.16 0 0 Weaknesses 1. Diversity among the suppliers and shippers. 0.12 0 0 4 0.48 2. Advertising expenses increased 0.05 0 0 0 0 3. Hershey plan to discontinue their Cacao Reserve as Starbucks. 0.11 1 0.11 3 0.33 4. Declined of Hershey other assets due to the unfavorable in economy to $151,561 in 2008 from $540,249 in 2007. 0.08 2 0.16 2 0.16 5. Switch of consumer to lower price products. 0.04 1 0.04 1 0.04 6. The company long term debt increased from $1,279,965 in 2007 to $1,505,954 in 2008. 0.07 0 0 0 0 7. Total charges to Hersheys Global Program 0.03 1 0.03 1 0.03 have been forecasted downward from $665 million to $640 million. Subtotal 1.00 1.52 1.62 Opportunities 1. Increase demand from the market 0.05 4 0.20 2 0.10 2. Ethics and Sustainability labor and environmental of organizations 0.05 4 0.20 1 0.05 3. new opportunities for marketing in media 0.06 2 0.12 1 0.06 4. Confectionery industry that will diversify consumers taste which will from gums and jelly beans to chocolate product. 0.10 0 0 0 0 5. global market expands in value which approximately at $17.4 billion by 2010. 0.05 0 0 0 0 6. Chocolate had coverage for 55.8 percent of the market overall global value. 0.06 0 0 2 0.12 7. Products price point had caused the recession does not impact confectionary products drastically. 0.04 1 0.04 1 0.04 8. The major 50 firms in the industry had control less than 40 percent of the market. 0.03 1 0.03 2 0.06 9. Mergers and acquisitions influenced market share and product portfolio in global firms especially in confectionary industry 0.07 1 0.07 3 0.21 10. The drastic growth of organic foods products had become one of the fastest growing sectors in United States with a projected value of $26.3billion by 2011 0.05 0 0 1 0.05 Threats 1. Slow on economic growth- high unemployment caused consumer cutting budget on those unnecessary things. 0.07 4 0.28 1 0.07 2. Price fluctuations of cost in main ingredients such as Sugar. In U.S 2009, the wholesaler sugar had increase up to 70percent. 0.10 0 0 0 0 3. Higher manufacturing cost due to increase in healthy food. More consumers demand on that organic healthy food. 0.08 2 0.16 1 0.08 4. Obesity is increasing gradually and consumer aware about it. 0.04 0 0 0 0 5. Increase in fuel cost impact the shipping and distribution cost. 0.07 1 0.07 3 0.21 6. International wholesale sugar prices may reach 40 cents a pound. 0.08 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 1.0 1.17 1.05 Grand Total 2.0 2.69 2.67
Based on the matrix above, we can note that the sum total attractiveness scores of 2.69 versus 2.67 which is very close indicator. The higher number indicates that the business should create fast track programs for developing new products from employees ideas.