0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
77 vues41 pages
The gerund plays a central role in the synta' of the modern language( but its form is not everywhere the same. There are many %n!lish words indicatin! &renewal&' which are commonly used in $assi#e constructions" the pavilion can be repaired. The wood can be replaced. The iron-work can be painted with anti-corrosive paint.
The gerund plays a central role in the synta' of the modern language( but its form is not everywhere the same. There are many %n!lish words indicatin! &renewal&' which are commonly used in $assi#e constructions" the pavilion can be repaired. The wood can be replaced. The iron-work can be painted with anti-corrosive paint.
The gerund plays a central role in the synta' of the modern language( but its form is not everywhere the same. There are many %n!lish words indicatin! &renewal&' which are commonly used in $assi#e constructions" the pavilion can be repaired. The wood can be replaced. The iron-work can be painted with anti-corrosive paint.
Are you FOR or AGAINST the restoration of the West Pier?
Pessimism Constructions followed y the !erund" It isn't worth _______ ing ....... It's a waste of time _______ ing ..... It's no good ______ ing ....... It's no use _______ing ..... Infiniti#e constructions" The structure is too weak to repair. The woodwork is too rotten to maintain. The iron is too corroded to last another 100 years. The pavilion is too delapidated to restore. O$timism Constructions followed y the !erund" It's well worth _______ ing ....... Passi#e constructions" The wood can be replaced. The iron-work can be painted with anti-corrosive paint. The pavilion can be repaired. There are many %n!lish words indicatin! &renewal&' which are commonly used in $assi#e constructions" renewed reconstructed rebuilt repainted re-euipped refurbished redesigned Pre$are your ar!uments and use them to say which side you are on( !ote "1# The $asue %erund by &arry Trask Larry Trask, a world expert on Basque linguistics and the history of the Basque language, passed away on March 28, 2004 Larry contri!uted extensi"ely to se"eral onlineco##unities, including Basque$L and the %ndoeuropean listThis collection of his postings is dedicated in his #e#ory $asue has a very prominent verb-form called the gerund. The gerund plays a central role in the synta' of the modern language( but its form is not everywhere the same. )everal suffi'es are used to form the gerund# <-te>, as in <Zuk hori egitea nahi dut> <-tze>, as in <Zu hona etortzea nahi dut> <-keta> <-ta> In most dialects( we find both *-te+ and *-t,e+( with a small difference in use. The suffi' *-te+ is used with verbs ending in *-n+( as in *egitea+ above( from *egin+( and with verbs whose stems end in a sibilant( as in *-uk hori ikustea nahi dut+( from *ikusi+( stem *ikus-+. The suffi' *-t,e+ is used with all other verbs( as in *etort,ea+ above. In $i,kaian( *-te+ is generally preferred with all verbs( and it is usually added to the participle( rather than to the stem( producing forms like *artutea+ for common *hart,ea+. In .oncalese( the suffi' used is *-ta+( which may perhaps be a variant form of *-te+. /e also find *-ta+ sometimes in $i,kaian( but here it seems to be clearly only a variant of *-te+. In the west of %ipu,koa( the suffi' used is( or at least was in 0,kue's day( *-keta+( producing forms like *ikusketa+ for common *ikustea+. !ow( this regional variation in formation suggests that the gerund is not particularly ancient in $asue( and that it has developed in somewhat different ways in the several dialects. 1oreover( we can probably identify the sources of the several suffi'es. $asue has a noun-forming suffi' *-te+( which most commonly e'presses duration( as in *eurite+ 'rainy spell' and *gosete+ 'famine'. It also has a noun-forming suffi' *-t,a+ 2 *-t,e+( which has several functions but often e'presses abundance( as in *3endet,a+ 2 *3endet,e+ 'crowd( multitude' and *dirut,a+ 2 *dirut,e+ 'wealth( riches'. 0nd( of course( it has a very freuent noun-forming suffi' *-keta+( which again has several functions but most commonly e'presses activity( as in *,e,enketa+ 'bull-running' and *hi,keta+ 'conversation'( though it can also e'press abundance( as in *3endeketa+ 'crowd'. )ome years ago I proposed that these three noun-forming suffi'es were the sources of the three suffi'es forming gerunds. The semantics looks good( since 'duration'( 'abundance' and 'activity' are all plausible meanings for creating nominali,ed forms of verbs. 1oreover( all three of these suffi'es( apart from forming gerunds( can also be added to verb- stems to produce ordinary nouns. Take *egin+( for e'ample. This gives rise to a derived noun *egite+ 'deed'( as in *aitaren egite i,ugarriak+ '4ather's terrible deeds'. 5ere *egite+ is not a gerund at all( but 3ust a plain old noun( behaving like any other noun( and showing no verbal properties. In contrast( in *0itak hori egitea nahi dut+ 'I want 4ather to do that'( we have a gerund( a verb-form( showing typical verbal properties such as taking a suitably case-marked sub3ect 6*aitak+7 and a suitably case-marked ob3ect 6*hori+7. I conclude( therefore( that the three noun-forming suffi'es were first added to verb-stems in order to derive simple nouns( but that these verbal nouns gradually came to be re-analy,ed as verb-forms( and therefore acuired the verbal properties they have today -- even though verbal nouns like *egite+ continue to e'ist in the language. )upport for this interpretation comes from the northern dialects( in which the gerunds are still not uite entirely verbal today. 0s is well known( a northerner says *0itaren ikusterat noa+ instead of *0ita ikustera noa+( with genitive *aitaren+( as though *ikustera6t7+( a case-marked form of the gerund( were an ordinary noun( reuiring a genitive( and unable to take an ob3ect. Today( the gerund always takes the article *-a+. $ut clearly this was not always so( since the imperfective participle is constructed by adding locative *-n+ directly to the gerund( without the article. )o( modern $asue( from *heldu+ 'arrive'( forms an imperfective participle *helt,en+ 'arriving'( as well as a locative form *helt,ean+ 'on arriving' from the gerund *helt,ea+. 8riginally( *helt,en da+ must have been 9*helt,e-n da+ 'he is at arriving'. 0ll of this is astonishingly similar to the history of the :nglish gerund. /e form our gerunds in *-ing+( as in ';eliberately tripping an opponent is a foul'. This gerund( like every gerund( is a verb-form( showing typical verbal properties( such as taking an ob3ect and an adverb. 0nd we know where this gerund came from. The %ermanic languages have a noun-forming suffi' of the original form 9*-ung+. This suffi' still e'ists in %erman today( in nouns like *5offnung+ 'hope'. In :nglish( the suffi' developed to *-ing+( but it long remained only a noun-forming suffi'. It still is today in many cases# 'sacking' 6material for making sacks7( 'roofing' 6material for making roofs7('bedding' 6stuff put on a bed7( and so on. !ow( many centuries ago( :nglish had lots of grammatical endings( and these endings usually marked parts of speech uite clearly. $ut then these endings gradually disappeared. 0s a result( it is now impossible to tell whether an :nglish word is a noun or a verb 3ust by looking at it. <onseuently( :nglish-speakers began to reanaly,e the nouns in *-ing+. :ven though 'lighting'( for e'ample( is historically derived from the 9noun9 'light'( it now looks as though it might be derived from the 9verb9 'light'. 0ccordingly( we began sticking *-ing+ onto verbs to make verbal nouns. /e still do this( too. 4or e'ample( in 'the hunting of the snark' or in 'the deliberate tripping of an opponent'( the words 'hunting' and 'tripping' are 3ust plain nouns( not verbs. These things can even be plurali,ed when the sense permits( as in 'comings and goings'. $ut then( like the $asues( we began re-analy,ing these forms as verb-forms( and treating them like verbs. 0nd( like the northern $asues( we still have not gone uite all the way with this. <onservative :nglish reuires a gerund to take a genitive sub3ect( as in 'I don't like his driving so fast'. This traditional form is now giving way to a form with no genitive# =I don't like him driving so fast'. This new form is now almost universal in $ritain( though the older form still predominates in the >)0. 0nd we obtained our imperfective 6=present=7 participle in much the same way as the $asues. 0t first we used verbal nouns in *-ing+ merely as nouns. These nouns occurred after the preposition 'on' in sentences like this one# '5e is on sitting on the porch'. 5ere 'sitting' is still clearly a noun. $ut then the preposition was weakened# '5e is a'sitting on the porch'. These forms can still be heard today in the 0ppalachian 1ountains( and often in country music. $ut then( in most varieties of :nglish( the preposition was lost altogether( producing the modern form# '5e is sitting on the porch'. 0nd we now interpret forms like 'sitting' as ordinary verb-forms( not as nouns# ')he is washing the car'. 6The old form would have been this# ')he is a'washing of the car'.7 )o( $asue and :nglish seem to have traveled down remarkably similar roads in acuiring their modern gerunds and imperfective participles. &arry Trask <8%) >niversity of )usse' $righton $!1 ?@5 >A Tel# 601"BC7-DBED?C 6from >A7F GHH-1"BC-DBED?C 6from abroad7 4a'# 601"BC7-DB1C"0 6from >A7F GHH-1"BC-DB1C"0 6from abroad $asues The $asues are a people whose homeland is the westernmost part of the Iyrenees 1ountains and the immediately surrounding regions. This area comprises four provinces in )pain 6%uipu,coa( Ji,caya( 0lava( and !avarra7 and three provinces in the department of Iyrenees- 0tlantiue in 4rance 6)oule( &abourd( and $asse-!avarre7. Anown to the )panish as vascos and to the 4rench as basues( the $asues call themselves :uskaldunak and their homeland :uskadi. $asue speakers number about E?0(000 in )pain and E0(000 in 4rance 61?EB est.7( but a larger number identify themselves as $asues in each country. The origins of the $asues are still a mystery. Their language is unrelated to any Indo-:uropean language. 0lthough they look much like their 4rench and )panish neighbors( $asues possess the lowest freuency of blood-type $ and the highest freuencies of types 8 and .h-negative of any population in :urope. They are staunchly .oman <atholic and noted for their distinctive folklore( folk theater( games( music( and a light-footed( acrobatic form of dancing. Traditionally a fiercely independent peasant and fishing people( they were known as early as the 1iddle 0ges as skilled boat makers and courageous whale hunters and cod fishermen who often ranged far into the 0tlantic. Their characteristic settlement is the isolated farm. The growth of villages is a relatively recent response to increased industry and trade in the $asue region. 0 large number of $asues have migrated to !orth and )outh 0merica. 5istorically( this migration has been the result partly of adverse political circumstances 6most $asues opposed the 4ranco regime in )pain7 and partly of the inheritance rule known as primogeniture( by which the oldest son inherits the family farm. Kounger sons generally have either sought employment in coastal settlements as industrial workers or fishermen( or they have migrated to the !ew /orld( freuently finding work as sheepherders. Isolated in their mountainous homeland( the $asues repulsed incursions by .omans( %ermanic tribes( 1oors( and others until the 1B00s. They lost their autonomy in 4rance after the 4rench .evolution 61BE?7 and in )pain by the early 1E00s. 0 movement for $asue separatism rose in the 1?th and "0th centuries... )pain's $asues were granted home rule in 1?E0. Taken from... &o!ert T 'nderson Bi!lio( Bi!liography( )lark, &o!ert *, The Basques +,-80./ 0ouglass, 1 ', ed, Basque *olitics +,-82./ 3allop, &odney, The Book of the Basques +,-40/ repr ,-50./ 6ei!erg, Marianne, The Making of the Basque 7ation +,-8-./ *ayne, 8 3, Basque 7ationalis# +,-52. )opyright notice( )opyright !y 3rolier 9lectronic *u!lishing, %nc !ote H# :dun( To 5ave by &arry Trask Larry Trask, a world expert on Basque linguistics and the history of the Basque language, passed away on March 28, 2004 Larry contri!uted extensi"ely to se"eral onlineco##unities, including Basque$L and the %ndoeuropean listThis collection of his postings is dedicated in his #e#ory 0 few comments on the old verb 9*edun+ 'have'. This verb is nowhere recorded as its participle 6hence the asterisk7( or indeed as any non-finite form at all( but its former e'istence is nonetheless certain. 6Interestingly( a gerund *edutea+ is recorded in one 1Eth-century inscriptionF this might be the gerund of 9*edun+( but eually it might be the gerund of that verb's derivative *eduki+.7 The non-finite forms of 9*edun+ are supplied suppletively by *ukan+ in the east and by *i,an+ in the west. In the north( the finite forms of 9*edun+ are still the ordinary forms for e'pressing 'have'. In the south( the verb is now largely confined to elevated styles in this function( and 'have' is commonly e'pressed instead by the derivative *eduki+. $ut( in all varieties( the finite forms of 9*edun+ still provide the indicative forms of the transitive au'iliary( like *dut+ and *du+. /e can easily reconstruct the original present-tense forms of 9*edun+. 5ere they are# 1 Sg *<da-du-da> 2 Sg M *<da-du-ga> 2 Sg F *<da-du-na>, or possibly *<da-du-na-ga> 3 Sg *<da-du> 1 l *<da-du-gu> 2 l *<da-du-zu> !today a singular" 3 l *<da-du-te> !#ost $arieties", but *<da-du-e> !%izkaian" 5ere 9*da-+ is the old present-tense marker( 9*-du-+ is the root of the verb 9*edun+( and the suffi'es mark agreement for person and number. )ome 6not all7 of these suffi'es are related to the corresponding pronouns( of course. The third-singular agreement suffi' was ,ero( as is usual in $asue. In the third plural( we find 9*-te+ in most dialects but 9*-e+ in $i,kaianF there is reason to suppose that the $i,kaian form is older( but we lack the evidence to draw firm conclusions. These forms developed as follows in all dialects# 1 Sg *<daut> 2 Sg M *<dauk> 2 Sg F *<daun> 3 Sg <dau> 1 l *<daugu> 2 l *<dauzu> 3 l *<daute>, but % *<daue> These forms are the ancestors of all the modern ones. In $i,kaian( *dau+ has remained unchanged( and 9*daue+ has simply been strengthened to *dabe+. In all the other forms( the diphthong LauL was leveled to LoL in $i,kaian( producing the modern forms *dot+( *dok+( *don+( *dogu+( *do,u+. In all the remaining dialects( the diphthong LauL apparently changed to LeuL( producing the following forms# 1 Sg *<deut> 2 Sg M *<deuk> 2 Sg F *<deun> 3 Sg *<deu> 1 l *<deugu> 2 l *<deuzu> 3 l *<deute> The ne't dialect to separate was %ipu,koan( in which this LeuL developed as follows# it was reduced to LuL in the two third-person forms( but to LeL in all other forms. This gave the modern %ipu,koan forms# *det+( *dek+( *den+( *du+( *degu+( *de,u+( *dute+. In all the remaining dialects( the diphthong LeuL changed uniformly to LuL. The result was the forms we find in most other dialects today# *dut+( *duk+( *dun+( *du+( *dugu+( *du,u+( *dute+. -uberoan( of course( has undergone one further change# the regular -uberoan change of LuL to LML 6that's u-umlaut7( yielding -uberoan *dMt+( *dMk+( and so on. The original forms still show up to some e'tent when a suffi' is added. 4or e'ample( when we add the relative suffi' *-n+( the form *dut+ becomes *dudan+( *duk+ becomes *duan+ 6from earlier 9*dugan+( and *dun+ becomes *dunan+. 0 further point. The verb 9*edun+ has given rise to several derivatives. The old suffi' *-ki+ 68ld $i,kaian *-gi+7( as I mentioned earlier( added a dative ob3ect to a verb. This is the source of *eduki+( which used to take a dative ob3ect but no longer does. The earlier sense of this verb was 'hold( hold on to( grasp'( and this is still the sense the verb has in the north today. In the south( however( the sense of this verb has been generali,ed to 'have'( and *eduki+ has displaced 9*edun+ as the ordinary verb for 'have'. It is in fact a very common development in languages generally for a verb meaning something like 'hold( grasp( sei,e' to develop into 'have'. 0 good e'ample is :nglish 'have'( which has developed from a II: verb that anciently meant 'sei,e' -- also the source of &atin *capere+ 'sei,e'. 0nother e'ample is <astilian *tener+ 'have'( which has developed from &atin *tenere+ 'hold( keep( grasp'( and which has displaced earlier *haber+ as the ordinary verb for 'have'. This *haber+ develops from &atin *habere+ 'have'( and( like 9*edun+ in the south( it is now confined to use as an au'iliary. 6Incidentally. &atin *habere+ itself originally meant 'hold'( and it is cognate with verbs in several other I: languages meaning 'sei,e( grasp'( and also( it appears( more surprisingly( with :nglish 'give'.7 0 second derivative is *ukan+ 'have'. This began as roughly 9*edukan+( probably to be analy,ed as 9*e-du-ka-n+( with a somewhat pu,,ling suffi'. The development of this to 9*eukan+ and then to *ukan+ would be perfectly regular. 0 third derivative is *eutsi+. This clearly contains the suffi' *-ts-+( which( like *-ki+( conferred the ability to take a dative ob3ect. The structure is probably 9*e-du-ts-i+. This chiefly western verb means 'sei,e( grab( grasp'( and it still takes a dative ob3ect today. In $i,kaian( uniuely( this verb also provides the forms of the transitive au'iliary when a dative ob3ect is present( as in *emon deutsat+ or *emon dotsat+ 'I gave it to him'. 0ll the other dialects use different verbs for this purpose. I might close by adding that the history of the $asue au'iliaries( and above all of the dative- marked au'iliaries( is complicated( messy and obscure. 8nly a few centuries ago( it seems( speakers were able to choose from a wide range of verbs to serve as au'iliaries. :ven by the beginning of the literary period( in the 1Dth century( the position was still rather complicated( with different dialects using a range of different au'iliaries. 8nly in the last couple of centuries has the position settled down somewhat( though considerable regional variation still e'ists. &arry Trask <8%) >niversity of )usse' $righton $!1 ?@5 >A larrytNcogs.sus'.ac.uk Gerund Phrase Review Instructions# Read the sentences below. Select an appropriate word from the verb list. Convert it to a gerund. Place it in the space provided. No gerund is used twice. Click Review Answer to see how you went. )er *ist" analyse' enrol' indicate' ma+e' read' re$lace' sac+' stay' study' wal+' wor+ 1. 1any people en3oyed along the new footpaths. ". The students discussed together to complete the assignment. C. The 3udge delayed a decision because new evidence had been presented that an ad3ournment was in the best interests of 3ustice. H. The new manager advocated twenty per cent of the staff as a matter of principle. O. $ecause %eraldine en3oyed history she decided in a Ih; was a good thing to do. D. !ot all students en3oy literature( some 3ust prefer for pleasure. B. )he hated up so late. E. The mechanic discussed the filters when the car would be due for its ne't service. Gerund Glossary From Gerald Erichsen, Your Guide to Spanish Language. FREE GIFT with Newsletter! Act Now! Definition: Traditionally, gerund is the term used to re!er to a certain Latin "er# !orm that could !unction as a noun. Nowadays, the term generally is used to re!er to the present participle in English and the "er#al present participle o! Spanish. These are the "er# !orms that end in $%ing in English and -ando or -endo in Spanish. &n #oth languages, the gerund is used to !orm the progressi"e or continuous tenses. Note that while the English gerund can #e and !re'uently is used a noun, the Spanish gerund does not !unction as a noun.( Some grammarians also use the term gerund more loosely to re!er to any "er# !orm when it is !unctioning as a noun. Generally, you should not assume this de!inition is meant unless the conte)t ma*es clear this is what is intended. Sponsored Lins Spanish !ra""ar online &nteracti"e Spanish grammar courses online with personali+ed tutorials www.Aula,ie+.com En!lish Gra""ar Editin! Let -ro!essors and .opy Editors -ro!essionally Edit your English www.edita"enue.com Spanish translations English Spanish translation ser"ice /e'uest our rate card today. www.thelanguage!actory.co.u* Cha$ter II( Synta, PARTICIP*% AN- G%R.N- IT is advisable to make a few remarks on the participle and gerund together before taking them separately. 0s the word gerund is variously used( we first define it. 0 gerund is the verbal noun identical in form with any participle( simple or compound( that contains the termination $ing Thus the verb write has the active participles writing, ha"ing written, !eing a!out to write, a!out to write, and the passive participles written, ha"ing !een written, !eing written, a!out to !e written, !eing a!out to !e written 0ny of these e'cept written, a!out to write, a!out to !e written, may be a gerund alsoF but while the participle is an ad3ective( the gerund is a noun( differing from other nouns in retaining its power 6if the active gerund of a transitive verb7 of directly governing another noun. $oth these are of great importance for our purpose. The participle itself( even when confusion with the other cannot occur( is much abusedF and the slovenly uses of it that were good enough in $urke's time are now recogni,ed solecisms. 0gain( the identity between the two forms leads to loose and unaccountable gerund constructions that will probably be swept away( as so many other la'ities have been( with the advance of grammatical consciousness. /e shall have to deal with both these points at some length. It is indeed no wonder that the forms in $ing should reuire close attention. :'actly how many old :nglish terminations $ing is heir to is a uestion debated by historical grammarians( which we are not competent to answer. $ut we may point out that writing may now be 617 participlePI was writingF I saw him writingF writing piously( he acts profanelyP( 6"7 gerund or full verbal nounPI ob3ect to your writing thatP( 6C7 hybrid between gerund and participlePI do not mind you writing itP( 6H7 detached verbal nounP/riting is an acuired artP( 6O7 concrete nounP This writing is illegible. 1oreover( the verbal noun writing has the synonym to write, obligatory instead of it in some conne'ions( better in some( worse in some( and impossible in othersF compare( for instance# I do not like the trouble of writingF I shall not take the trouble to writeF the trouble of writing is too much for himF it is a trouble to writeF writing is a trouble. The grammatical difficulties( that is( are complicated by considerations of idiom. In these preliminary remarks( however( it is only with the distinction or want of distinction between participle and gerund that we are concerned. The participle is an ad3ective( and should be in agreement with a noun or pronounF the gerund is a noun( of which it should be possible to say clearly whether( and why( it is in the sub3ective( ob3ective( or possessive case( as we can of other nouns. That the distinction is often obscured( partly in conseuence of the history of the language( will be clear from one or two facts and e'amples. 1. The #an is !uilding contains what we should all now call( whether it is so or not historically( a participle or verbal ad3ective# the house is !uilding 6older but still living and correct :nglish for the house is !eing !uilt. contains( as its remarkable difference of meaning prepares us to believe( a gerund or verbal noun( once governed by a now lost preposition. ". In 6e stopped, laughing we have a participleF in 6e stopped laughing, a verbal noun governed directly by the verbF in 6e !urst out laughing, a verbal noun governed by a vanished preposition. C. Iresent usage does not bear out the definite modern ideas of the distinction between participle and gerund as respectively ad3ective and noun. )o long as that usage continues( there are various degrees of ambiguity( illustrated by the three following e'amples. It would be impossible to say( whatever the conte't( whether the writer of the first intended a gerund or a participle. In the second( a previous sentence would probably have decided the uestion. In the third( though grammar 6again as modified by present usage7 leaves the uestion open( the meaning of the sentence is practically decisive by itself. <an he conceive Matthew 'rnold per#itting such a book to be written and published about himselfQPTi#es 0nd no doubt that end will be secured by the )o##ission sitting in Iaris.PTi#es Those who know least of them Rthe virtuesS know very well how much they are concerned in other people ha"ing them.P1orley. In the second of these( if sitting is a participle( the meaning is that the end will be secured by the <ommission( which is described by way of identification as the one sitting in Iaris. If sitting is gerund( the end will be secured by the wise choice of Iaris and not another place for its scene. If )o##ission:s were written( there could be no doubt the latter was the meaning. /ith )o##ission, there is( by present usage( absolutely no means of deciding between the two meanings apart from possible light in the conte't. In the third( common sense is able to tell us( though grammar gives the uestion up( that what is interesting is not the other people who have them( but the uestion whether other people have them. /e shall( in the section on the gerund( take up the decided position that all gerunds ought to be made distinguishable from participles. /e are uite aware( however( that in the first place a language does not remodel itself to suit the grammarian's fancy for neat classificationF that secondly the confusion is not merely wanton or ignorant( but the result of natural developmentF that thirdly the change involves some inconveniences( especially to hurried and careless writers. 8n the other hand it is certain that the permanent tendency in language is towards the correct and logical( not from itF it is merely hoped that the considerable number of instances here collected may attract the attention of some writers who have not been aware of the uestion( and perhaps convince them that the distinction is a useful one( that a writer ought to know and let us know whether he is using a participle or a gerund( and that to abandon the gerund when it cannot be distinguished without clumsiness need cause no difficulty to any but the very unskilful in handling words. Cha$ter II( Synta, PARTICIP*%S T5: unattached or wrongly attached participle is one of the blunders most common with illiterate or careless writers. $ut there are degrees of heinousness in the offenceF our e'amples are arranged from 1. to E. in these degrees( starting with perfect innocence. 1. Iarticiples that have passed into prepositions( con3unctions( or members of adverbial phrases. )onsidering the circumstances( you may go. 8eeing that it was involuntary( he can hardly be blamed. .oughly speaking, all #en are liars. Looking at it in a shortened perspective of time( those years of transition have the uality of a single consecutive occurrence.P5. %. /ells. The Bill ... will bring about( assu#ing that it meets with good fortune in the remaining stages of its passage through Iarliament( a very useful reform.PTi#es .egarded as participles( these are incorrect. It is not you that consider( but IF not he that sees( but weF not #en that roughly speak( but the moralistF not years that look( but philosophic historiansF not the Bill that assumes( but the newspaper prophet. The development into prepositions( Tc.( is a natural one( howeverF the only uestion about any particular word of the kind is whether the vo' populi has yet declared for itF when it has( there is no more to be saidF but when it has not( the process should be resisted as long as possible( writers acting as a suspensive 5ouse of &ordsF an instance will be found in H. Three uotations from $urke will show that he( like others of his time( felt himself more at liberty than most good writers would now feel themselves. ;ounding the appeal on this basis( it was <udged proper to lay before Iarliament...P $urke. ;lattering themselves that their power is become necessary to the support of all order and government( e"erything which tends to the support of that power is sanctified=$urke. 6a"ing considered terror as producing an unnatural tension and certain violent emotions of the nervesF it easily follows=$urke. )imilar constructions may be found on almost every page of )mollett. ". Iarticiples half 3ustified by attachment to a pronoun implied in #y, your, his, their These are perhaps better avoided. 6a"ing thus run through the causes of the sublime with reference to all the senses( #y first observation will be found very nearly true.P$urke. Being much interested in the correspondence bearing on the uestion ';o we believeQ'( the first difficulty arising in #y mind is...P0aily Telegraph My farm consisted of about twenty acres of e'cellent land( ha"ing gi"en a hundred pounds for my predecessor's good will.P%oldsmith. C. 1ere unattached participles for which nothing can be said( e'cept that they are sometimes inoffensive if the word to be supplied is very vague. 0ou!ling the point( and running along the southern shore of the little peninsula( the scene changes.P4. 1. <rawford. The most trying ... period was this one of enforced idleness waiting for the day of entry. PTi#es 6a"ing acquired so many tropical colonies there is the undoubted duty attached to such possession of...PTi#es H. Iarticiples that may some day become prepositions( Tc. )irP&eferring to your correspondent's 6the $ishop of <roydon's7 letter in to-day's issue( he uotes at the close of it the following passage.P0aily Telegraph 6e must be the $ishopF for the immediately preceding 8ir, marking the beginning of the letter( shows that no one else has been mentionedF but if we had given the sentence without this indication( no one could possibly have believed that this was soF referring is not yet unparticipled. O. 0n unwary writer sometimes attaches a participle to the sub3ect of a previous sentence( assuming that it will be the sub3ect of the new sentence also( and then finds 6or rather is not awake enough to find7 himself mistaken. This is a trap into which good writers sometimes fall( and so dangerous to bad writers that we shall give many e'amples. It is important for the tiro to reali,e that he has not satisfied the elementary reuirements of grammar until he has attached the participle to a noun in the same sentence as itself( not in another. 5e must also remember that( for instance( % went and he ca#e, though often spoken of loosely as a sentence( is in fact as fully two sentences as if each half of it were ten lines long( and the two were parted by a full stop and not connected by a con3unction. They had now reached the airy dwelling where 1rs. 1acshake resided( and ha"ing rung, the door was at length most deliberately opened.P). 4errier. The lo"ers sought a shelter( and( mutually char#ed with each other( ti#e flew for a while on downy pinions.P). 4errier. 0 molecular change is propagated to the muscles by which the body is retracted( and causing them to contract( the act of retraction is brought about.P5u'ley. >oseph, as they supposed( by tampering with /ill( got all my secrets( and was acuainted with all my motionsPF and ha"ing also undertaken to watch all those of his young lady( the wise fa#ily were secure.P.ichardson. Miss *inkerton ... in vain ... tried to overawe her. 'tte#pting once to scold her in public( &e!ecca hit upon the ... plan of answering her in 4rench( which uite routed the old woman.PThackeray. $ut he thought it derogatory to a brave knight passively to await the assault( and ordering his own men to charge( the hostile squadrons, rapidly advancing against each other( met midway on the plain.PIrescott. 0lvarado( roused by the noise of the attack on this uarter( hastened to the support of his officer( when 'l#agro, sei,ing the occasion( pushed across the bridge( dispersed the small body left to defend it( and( falling on 0lvarado's rear( that general saw himself hemmed in on all sides.PIrescott. Murtagh, without a word of reply( went to the door( and shouting into the passage something in Irish( the roo# was instantly filled with bogtrotters.P$orrow. $ut( as before( 'nne once more made me smart( and ha"ing equipped herself in a gown and bonnet of minePnot of the newestPoff we set.P<rockett. 0t this I was silent for a little( and then % resolved to speak plainly to 0nne. $ut not !eing ready with my words( she got in first.P<rockett. 4or many years % had to contend with much opposition in the nature of scepticismF but ha"ing had hundreds of successful cases and proofs it has become such an established fact in the eastern counties that many landowners( Tc.( would not think of sinking a well without first seeking the aid of a water diviner.PTi#es D. 0 more obvious trap( and conseuently less fatal( is a change from the active construction that may have been intended to a passive( without corresponding alterations. If the writers of the ne't two had used we #ust ad#it instead of it #ust !e ad#itted, a policy that they put forward, instead of a policy put forward, the participles hesitating and !elie"ing would have had owners. /hile hesitating to accept this terrible indictment of 4rench infancy( it #ust !e ad#itted that 4rench literature in all its strength and wealth is a grown-up literature.P8pectator 5e and those with whom he acted were responsible for the policy promulgatedPa policy put forward in all seriousness and honesty !elie"ing it to be essential to the obtaining of the better government of Ireland.PTi#es B. Iarticiples that seem to belong to a noun( but do not. &etters on the constant stopping of omnibuses( thus causing considerable suffering to the horses. ;oes causing agree with letters? Then the letters annoy the horses. /ith stopping? Then stopping causes suffering by stopping 6thus. /ith o#ni!uses? The horses possibly blame those innocents( but we can hardly suppose a human being( even the writer of the sentence( so illogical. The word thus, however( is often considered to have a kind of dispensing power( freeing its participle from all obligationsF so# The Irince was( by the special command of his 1a3esty the :mperor( made the guardian of 5.I.5. the <rown Irince( thus necessitating the Irince's constant presence in the capital of Uapan.PTi#es 0 very wealthy man can never be sure even of friendship(Pwhile the highest( strongest and noblest kind of love is nearly always denied to him( in this way carrying out the fulfilment of those strange but true words#P'5ow hardly shall he that is a rich man enter the Aingdom of 5eavenV'P<orelli. It is not lo"e that carries out( but the power that denies love( which is not mentioned. E. .eally bad unattached or wrongly attached participles. The reader will generally find no difficulty in seeing what has led to the blunder( and if he will take the trouble to do this( will be less likely to make similar blunders himself. 0nd then stooping to take up the key to let #yself into the garden( he started and looked as if he heard somebody near the door.P.ichardson. )irP/ith reference to this uestion ';o we believe'( while recogni@ing the vastness of the sub3ect( its modern aspect has some definite features.P0aily Telegraph Taken in con3unction with the splendid white and brown trout-fishing of the .osses lakes and rivers( anglers have now the opportunity of fishing one of the best( if not the best( fishery to be obtained in Ireland.P0dvt. )irP6a"ing read with much interest the letters re '$elieve only' now appearing in the 0aily Telegraph, perhaps some of your readers might be interested to know the following te'ts which have led some great men to 'believe only'.P0aily Telegraph Being pushed unceremoniously to one sidePwhich was precisely what wishedPhe usurped my place.P<. $rontW. The higher forms of speech acuire a secondary strength from association. 6a"ing, in actual life( habitually heard them in conne'ion with mental impressions( and ha"ing !een accusto#ed to meet with them in the most powerful writing( they come to have in themselves a species of force.P)pencer. 8tanding over one of the sluices of the 0swan dam last Uanuary( not only was the vibration evident to the senses...PTi#es The following passage may be commended for use in e'amination papers. '0lways !elo"ed by the Imperial couple who are to-day the )overeign lord and lady of %reat $ritain( their 1a3esties have( on many occasions since the ;evonshire houses re3oiced in a mistress once more( honoured them by visits e'tending over some days.'PTi#es The last( as the Ti#es reviewer has noticed( will repay analysis in several ways. ?. The asolute construction is not much to be recommended( having generally an alien air in :nglishF but it is sometimes useful. It must be observed( first( that the case used should now invariably be the sub3ective( though it was otherwise in old :nglish. )econdly( it is very seldom advisable to make an absolute construction and insert a pronoun for the purpose when the participle might simply be attached in ordinary agreement to a noun already to hand. Thirdly( it is very bad to use the construction( but omit to give the participle a noun or pronoun to itself. These three transgressions will be illustrated( in the same order( by the ne't three e'amples. $ut many of the wrong sentences in O. above may be regarded as absolute constructions with the sub3ect omitted. I( with whom that Impulse was the most intractable( the most capricious( the most maddening of masters 6hi# before me always e'cepted7...P<. $rontW. ')pecial' is a much overworked word( it being loosely used to mean great in degree( also peculiar in kind.P.. %. /hite. This is said now because( ha"ing !een said before( I have been 3udged as if I had made the pretensions which were then and which are now again disclaimed.P.. %. /hite. Cha$ter II( Synta, T/% G%R.N- T5:.: are three uestions to be considered# whether a writer ought to let us know that he is using a gerund and not a participleF when a gerund may be used without its sub3ect's being e'pressedF when a gerund with preposition is to be preferred to the infinitive. 1. Is the !erund to e made reco!ni0ale? 0nd( in the circumstances that make it possible( that is( when its sub3ect is e'pressed( is this to be done sometimes( or alwaysQ It is done by putting what we call for shortness' sake the sub3ect of the gerund 6i.e.( the word #e or #y in #e doing or #y doing. in the possessive instead of in the ob3ective or sub3ective case. Take the typical sentence# I dislike my best friend6's7 violating my privacy. It cannot be a true account of the matter to say that friend is the ob3ect of % dislike, and has a participle "iolating attached to it. 4or 6a7 we can substitute resent, which never takes a personal ob3ect( for dislike, without changing the sense. 6b7 If we substitute a passive construction( also without changing the sense( we find that dislike has uite a different ob3ectP pri"acy=I dislike my privacy being violated by my friend. 6c7 1any of us would be willing to adopt the sentiment conveyed who yet would not admit for a moment that they disliked their best friend even when he intrudedF they condemn the sin( but not the sinner. Aiolating then is not an ordinary participle. It does not follow yet that it is a gerund. It may be an e'traordinary participle( fused into one notion with the noun( so that a friend "iolating means the$"iolation$!y$a$friend The &atin scholar here at once puts in the idiom of occisus )aesar, which does not generally mean )aesar after he was killed, as it naturally should( but the killing of <aesar( or the fact that <aesar had been killed. The parallel is close 6though the use is practically confined to the passive in &atin7( and familiar to all who know any &atin at all. $ut it shows not so much what the :nglish construction is as how educated people have been able to reconcile themselves to an ambiguous and not very reasonable idiomPnot very reasonable( that is( after language has thrown off its early limitations( and got over the first difficulty of accomplishing abstract e'pression of any kind. The sort of fusion assumed is further illustrated for the &atinist( though not so closely( by the &atin accusative and infinitive. This theory then takes "iolating for a participle fused into one notion with friend There are two difficulties. I. The construction in :nglish is( though in the nature of things not as common( yet as easy in the passive as in the active. !ow the passive of "iolating is either "iolated or !eing "iolated It is uite natural to say( Irivacy violated once is no longer inviolable. /hy then should it be most unnatural to say( The worst of privacy violated once is that it is no longer inviolableQ !o one( not purposely seeking the unusual for some reason or other( would omit !eing before "iolated in the second. Ket as participles "iolated and !eing "iolated are eually goodPnot indeed always( but in this conte't( as the simpler Irivacy sentence shows. The only difference between the two participles 6e'cept that in brevity( which tells against !eing "iolated. is that the longer form can also be the gerund( and the shorter cannot. The almost invariable choice of it is due to the instinctive feeling that what we are using is or ought to be the gerund. 0 more convincing instance than this mere adaptation of our original e'ample may be added# 1any years ago I became impressed with the necessity for our infantry !eing taught and practised in the skilful use of their rifle.P&ord .oberts. The necessity for our infantry taught and practised is absolutely impossible. $ut why( if !eing taught is participle( and not gerundQ II. 0ssuming that the fused-participle theory is satisfactory and recogni,ed( whence comes the general( though not universal impression among those who( without being well versed in grammar( are habitually careful how they speak and write( that constructions like the following are ignorant vulgarismsQPIt is no use he 6his7 doing itF it is no use him 6his7 doing itF that need not prevent us 6our7 believingF e'cuse me 6my7 interrupting youF a thing 6thing's7 e'isting does not prove that it ought to e'istF I was annoyed by Tom 6Tom's7 hesitatingF the Tsar 6Tsar's7 leaving .ussia is significantF it failed through the Aing 6Aing's7 refusing his signatureF without us 6our7 hearing the man( the facts cannot be got atF without the man 6man's7 telling us himself( we can never know. /ith a single e'ception for one 6not both7 of the first two( none of these ought to cause a moment's uneasiness to any one who was consciously or unconsciously in the fused- participle frame of mindF and if they do cause uneasiness it shows that that frame of mind is not effectively present. The 4used-Iarticiple Theory( having no sufficient answer to these ob3ections( but seeing that the gerund's case is also weak( naturally tries a counter-attack#PIf on the other hand the gerund theory is satisfactory and recogni,ed( how is it conceivable that people should leave out the possessive :s in the reckless way they doQ To which( however( the %erund makes reply#PI regret that they do leave it out( but at least we can see how they come toF it is the combined result of a mistake and an inconvenience. The mistake is caused by certain types of sentence in which a real( not a fused participle is so used that the noun and its 6unfused7 participle give a sense hardly distinguishable from a possessive noun and a gerund. :'amples are# This plan has now been abandoned owing to circu#stances requiring the convocation of representatives of the people at the earliest possible moment.P Ti#es ...by imposing as great difficulty as possible on parents and pu!licans using child messengers.PTi#es 8f course no obstacles should be put in the way of charita!le people pro"iding free or other meals if they think fit.PTi#es The notion of the )@ar !eing addressed in such terms by the nobility of his capital would have been regarded as an absolute impossibility.P8pectator There is of course a difference. 4or instance( in the e'ample about the <,ar( as in a previous one about concei"ing Matthew 'rnold per#itting, the participle has a pictorial effectF it invites us to imagine the physical appearance of these two great men under indignity instead of merely thinking of the abstract indignity( as we should have done if )@ar:s and 'rnold:s had shown that we had a gerundF but the difference is very fineF the possessive sign might be inserted without practical effect in all these four( and in hundreds like them. 0nd unlearned people may be e'cused for deducing that the sub3ect of the gerund can be used at pleasure without the possessive sign( while the learned comfort themselves with the fused- participle theory. That is the mistake. The inconvenience is this# it is easy enough to use the possessive ad3ectives 6#y, Tc.7( and to add the possessive sign to most names and many single nounsF but the sub3ect of a gerund is often a long phrase( after which the sign is intolerable. )o the mistake 6that the gerund may have a sub3ect not marked by the possessive7 is eagerly applied to obviating the inconvenience 6that long gerund sub3ects must be avoided7. 0nd that is why people drop their possessive :s, and why you( the 4used Iarticiple( flourish( defrauding both me( the %erund( and the honest participle. Thus answered( the 4used Iarticiple does not continue the argument( but pleads only that there is room for all three forms. $efore giving some e'amples to help in the decision( we shall summari,e our own opinion. 617 It is not a matter to be decided by appeal to historical grammar. 0ll three constructions may have separate legitimate descents( and yet in the interests of clear thought and e'pression it may be better for one of them to be abandoned. 6"7 There are two opposite tendencies at present# among careful writers( to avoid the fused participle 6this( being negative( can naturally not be illustrated7 and to put possessive signs in slightly uncomfortable places by way of compensationF among slovenly writers( to throw off all limits of length for the sub3ect of the fused participle. 6C7 &ong fused-participle phrases are a variety of abstract e'pression( and as such to be deprecated. 0mong the resources of civili,ation is the power of choosing between different ways of saying the same thingF and literary skill is very much a matter of e'ercising that powerF a writer should recogni,e that if he cannot get round an ugly fused participle there is still much for him to learn. 6H7 8pportunities for ambiguity are so abundant in :nglish( owing to the number of words whose parsing depends on conte't( that all aids to precision are valuableF and it is not too much to e'pect a writer to know and let us know whether he means a participle or a gerund. a. That the possessive of all pronouns that have the form should be used instead of the ob3ective or sub3ective is hardly disputed. <orrect accordingly# Kou may rely upon #e doing all in my power.P)ir /. 5arcourt. The confounded fetterlock clapped on my movements by old %riffiths prevents #e repairing to :ngland in person.P)cott. $ut when it comes to us following his life and e'ample...P0aily Telegraph !othing can prevent it being the main issue at the %eneral :lection.P 8pectator 8ne of them( if you will pardon #e reminding you( is that no discussion is to pass between us.P:. 4. $enson. 4rederick had already accepted the crown( lest Uames should ob3ect to hi# doing so.PTi#es ...notwithstanding the fact that their suspicions of ease-loving( ear-tickling parsons prevent the# supporting the commercial churches of our time.P0aily Telegraph b. :'amples in which the possessive of nouns might be written without a ualm. !early a week passed over without Mr ;airford hearing a word directly from his son.P)cott. 1rs. ;owne /right had not forgiven the indignity of her son having been refused by 1ary.P). 4errier. In no other religion is there a thought of #an being saved by grace and not by merit.P0aily Telegraph 0nd it is said that( on a "isitor once asking to see his library( ;escartes led him... P5u'ley. It is true that one of our ob3ects was to prevent 1 children 'sipping' the liuor they were sent for.PTi#es 8rders were sometimes issued to prohibit 1 soldiers buying and eating cucumbers.PTi#es .enewed efforts at a settlement in 1E?1 failed through the 8wedish 3o"ern#ent leading off with a flippant and offensive suggestion.P!ansen. 5urried reading results in the learner forgetting half of what he reads( or in his forming vague conceptions.P)weet. c. 0ll the last set involved what were either actual or virtual names of personsF there is more difficulty with abstract nouns( compound sub3ects( and words of which the possessive is ugly. Those that may perhaps bear the possessive mark will be put first( and alterations suggested for the others. /e look forward to #uch attention being given.PTi#es 5e affirmed that such increases were the rule in that city on the change being made.PTi#es I live in hopes of this discussion resulting in some modification in our form of belief.P0aily Telegraph 6that this discussion may result7 The real ob3ection to the possessive here is merely the addition to the crowd of sibilants. In the event of the passage being found( he will esteem it a favour... 6if the passage is found7 <onceive my ve'ation at being told by Iapa this morning that he had not the least ob3ection to 9dward and #e marrying whenever we pleased.P). 4errier. 6our7 8r( if the names are essential( did not in the least #ind how soon 9dward and % #arried It has been replied to the absurd taunt about the ;rench inventing nothing( that at least ;escartes invented %erman philosophy.P1orley. 64renchmen's7 d. 0 modern construction called the compound possessive was mentioned at the end of the section on <ases. It is sometimes ugly( sometimes inoffensiveF that is a matter of degree and of knowing where to draw the lineF there is no ob3ection to it in principle. 0nd the application of it will sometimes help out a gerund. The first uotation gives a compound possessive simplyF the second( a gerund construction to which it ought to be applicableF the third and fourth( two to which it can be appliedF and the last( one to which it cannot. 0 protestation( read at :dinburgh( was followed( on 'rchi!ald >ohnston of 1arriston:s suggestion( by...PU. .. %reen. The retirement of Uudge )tonor was made the sub3ect of special reference yesterday on the occasion of 8ir 1 L 8elfe, his successor, taking his seat in 1arylebone <ounty <ourt.PTi#es The mere fact of such a pre#ier being endured shows...P$agehot. There is no possibility of the dissolution of the legislati"e union becoming a vital uestion.P8pectator If some means could be devised for ... insisting upon #any 9nglish guardians of the poor making themselves more acuainted...PTi#es The only ob3ection to a possessive mark after successor is that the two commas cannot be dispensed withF we must say when took for on the occasion of taking 8uch a pre#ier:s will certainly pass. In the 8pectator sentence( we should ourselves allow union:s/ opinions will differ. $ut to put the :s after poor in the last sentence would be ridiculousF that sentence must be rewrittenPinsisting that many :nglish guardians of the poor should makePor else poor$law 3uardians: must be used. e. )ometimes we can get over the difficulty without abandoning the gerund( by some slight change of order. This incentive can only be supplied by the nation itself taking the matter up seriously.P&ord .oberts. If itself:s is ob3ected to( omit itself 6or shift it to the end7( and write nation:s f. $ut many types of sentence remain that will have to be completely changed if the gerund is to be recogni,able. It will be admitted about most of our e'amples that the change is not to be regretted. The sub3ect of the gerund is italici,ed in each( to emphasi,e its length. /e have to account for the collision of two great fleets, so equal in #aterial strength that the issue was thought dou!tful !y #any careful statisticians, ending in the total destruction of one of them and in the immunity of the other from damage greater than might well be incurred in a mere skirmish.PTi#es 4or account for ending write ascertain why ended The sentence is radically bad( because the essential construction seems complete at collision=a false scent. That( which is one of the worst literary sins( is the freuent result of long fused participles. It is uite practically possible here for readers to have supposed that they were going to be told why the fleets met( and not why the meeting ended as it did. In the remaining sentences( we shall say when there is false scent( but leave the reader to e'amine it. The success of the negotiations depends on the &ussian Minister at Tokio being allowed to convince Uapan that...PTi#es The compound possessivePTokio'sPis tempting( but perhaps overbold. Insert whether after depends on, and write is for !eing )o far from this being the case( the policy ... was actually decided upon before ... the uestion ... was raised.PTi#es 8mit !eing the case /e are not without tokens of an openness for this higher truth also, of a keen though unculti"ated sense for it, having e'isted in $urns.P<arlyle. 4or the first of write that, omit the second of, and omit ha"ing 4alse scent. There is no apparent evidence of an early peace being necessitated by the pecuniary e'igencies of the .ussian %overnment.P)ir 5oward Jincent. 4or of !eing write that will !e, if peace:s cannot be endured. The general effect of his words was to show the absurdity of the 8ecretary of 8tate for 1ar, and our #ilitary authorities generally, denouncing the 1ilitia as useless or redundant.P8pectator 4or the a!surdity of denouncing write how a!surd it was for to denounce 4alse scent( though less deceptive. 0pparently his mission was decided upon without that of the British and 8panish Ministers having been taken into account( or( at all events( without their having been sufficiently reckoned with.PTi#es /ithout regard 6at all events without sufficient regard7 to that of... ...capital seeking employment in foreign protected countries( in conseuence of #anufacturing !usiness in #any !ranches in which it #ight !e e#ployed at ho#e being rendered unprofitable by our system of free trade.P&ord %oschen. 4or in consequence of !eing write !ecause has !een $ad false scent again. )o far from the relief gi"en to agriculture !y the 8tate paying one$half of the rates being ineuitable( it is but a bare act of 3ustice.P8pectator 8bserve the fused participle within fused participle hereF and read thus# )o far from its being ineuitable that the state should relieve( Tc. 0fter these specimens( chosen not as e'ceptional ones( but merely as not admitting of simple correction by insertion of the possessive mark( the reader will perhaps agree that the long gerund sub3ectPor rather noun phrase of the fused participlePis a monstrosity( the abolition of which would be a relief to him( and good discipline for the writer. Two sentences are added to show the chaotic state of present practice. !oticing the bold use of the strict gerund in the first( we conclude that the author is a sound gerundite( faithful in spite of all temptationsF but a few pages later comes the needless relapse into fused participle. I remember old )olney:s once( in old days( calling that kind of marriage a sarcophagus.P1eredith. )he had thought in her heart that Mr Bar#!y espousing the girl would smoothe a troubled prospect.P1eredith. The following looks like a deliberate avoidance of both constructions by a writer who is undecided between the two. %ts !eing is what should have been written. I do not say that the advice is not sound( or complain that it is given. I do deprecate that it should !e taken.PTi#es 0nd perhaps a shyness of so#ething:s !eing shown accounts for the ne't odd arrangementF it is true that entire recasting is what is called for. There !eing shown to !e so#ething radically defective in the management of the $ank led to the appointment of a <ommittee.P5. ;. 1acleod. ". When must the su1ect of the !erund 2or infiniti#e3 e e,$ressed' and when omitted? This is not a controversial matter like the lastF the principles are uite simple( and will be acceptedF but it is necessary to state and illustrate them because they are often forgotten. 0s the same mistakes are sometimes made with the infinitive( that is to be considered as included. .oughly( the sub3ect of the gerund 6or infinitive7 should be e'pressed if it is different from( and omitted if it is the same as( the sub3ect of the sentence. To omit it when different is positively wrong( and may produce actual ambiguity or worse( though sometimes there is only a slipshod effectF to insert it when the same is generally clumsy. !o one would say 'I succeeded to his property upon dying'( because( % being the sub3ect of the sentence( #y is naturally suggested instead of the necessary his as sub3ect of the gerundF the his must be inserted before dying, even though the nature of the case obviates ambiguity. To take an instance that will show both sides( the following is correct# I shut the door and stood with my back to it. Then( instead of his philandering with $ess( I( <lementina 1acTaggart( had some plain speech with Uohn $arnaby.P<rockett. )ub3ect of the sentence( IF sub3ect of the gerund( heF they are differentF therefore the he must be e'pressed( in the shape of his !ow rewrite the main sentence asPUohn $arnaby heard some plain speech from me( <lementina 1acTaggart. The sense is the sameF but the his before philandering at once becomes superfluousF it is not yet seriously in the way( because we do not know what is the sub3ect of philandering, the name only coming later. !ow rewrite it again asPThen Uohn $arnaby heard some plain speech from ... instead of... The his is now so clumsy as to be almost impossible. The insertion of superfluous sub3ects is much less common than the omission of necessary onesF but three e'amples follow. The first is a rare and precious varietyF the second has no apparent 3ustificationF for the third it may be said that the unusual his has the same effect as the insertion of the parenthetic words as he actually does after li#iting would have had. Kou took food to him( but instead of he reaching out his hand and taking it( he kept asking for food.P0aily Telegraph 5arsh facts# sure as she was of her never losing her filial hold of the beloved.P1eredith. I have said that 1r. <hamberlain has no warrant for his li#iting the phrase ... to the competitive manufacture of goods.P&ord %oschen. In giving the rule summarily( we used the phrase su!<ect of the sentence That phrase is not to be confined to the sub3ect of the main sentence( but to be referred instead( when necessary( to the sub3ect of the subordinate clause in which the gerund may stand. 4or instance# The good( the illuminated( sit apart from the rest( censuring their dullness and vices( as if they thought that( !y sitting very grand in their chairs( the very brokers( attorneys( and congressmen would see the error of their ways( and flock to them.P:merson. 5ere !y sitting breaks the rule( though the sub3ect of sitting is the same as that of the main verb sit, because the sub3ect of the clause in which sitting comes is not the good, but !rokers, Bc The right way to mend this is not to insert their before sitting=which after all is clumsy( though correctPbut to make the good the sub3ect of the clause also( by writing as if they thought that !y sitting they would #ake the !rokers see the error 0nd sometimes su!<ect of the sentence is to be interpreted still more freely as the word grammatically dominant in the part of the sentence that contains the gerund. 4or instance# 4rom the $ible alone was she taught the duties of morality( but familiari,ed to her taste !y hearing its stories and precepts from the lips she best loved.P). 4errier. 5ere the dominant word is Bi!le, to which fa#iliari@ed belongs. )o( though she does happen to be the main sub3ect( her must be inserted because the fa#iliari@ed phrase removes the gerund from the reach of the main sub3ect. 0fter these e'planations we add miscellaneous instances. It will be seen that transgression of the rule( though it seldom makes a sentence ambiguous enough to deceive( easily makes it ambiguous enough to amuse the reader at wrong moments( or gives an impression of amateurish work. 1istakes are mended( sometimes by inserting the sub3ect of the gerund 6or infinitive7( sometimes by changing the main sub3ect to make it the same as that of the gerund( sometimes by other recasting. ...an e'cellent arrangement for a breeching( which( when released( remains with the carriage( so that lead or centre horses can be put in the wheel without ha"ing to affi' a new breeching.PTi#es &ucky( reflects the reader( since horses are not good at affi'ing breechings. /rite the dri"ers can put horses without ha"ing to affix I cultivated a passionless and cold e'terior( for I discovered that !y assu#ing such a character( certain otherwise crafty persons would talk more readily before me.P<orelli. /rite if % assu#ed/ or else % should induce certain persons to talk It will be noticed that the mistake here( and often( is analogous to the most freuent form of wrongly attached participle 6participle( O7F the writer does not observe that he has practically passed from the sphere of the sentence whose sub3ect was the word that he still allows to operate. 'fter following a country <hurch of :ngland clergyman for a period of half a century( a newly-appointed( youthful vicar( totally unacuainted with rural life( comes into the parish( and at once commences to alter the services of the <hurch( believed in by the parishioners for generations.P0aily Telegraph %rammar gives his, i.e.( the new vicar's( as sub3ect of following/ it is really either #y or the parishioners:. Insert #y or our, or write 'fter we +%. ha"e followed I am sensible that !y conni"ing at it it will take too deep root ever to be eradicated.P Ti#es Insert our, or write if conni"ed at This was e'perienced by certain sensitive temperaments( either by sensations which produced shivering( or !y seeing at night a peculiar light in the air.PTi#es /ho or what seesQ <ertainly not this, the main sub3ect. !ot even te#pera#ents, which have no eyes. /rite *ersons of sensiti"e te#pera#ent experienced this, Bc $ut the commercial interests of both %reat $ritain and the >nited )tates were too closely affected by the terms of the .usso-<hinese agreement to let it pass unnoticed.PTi#es It is not the interests that cannot let it pass( but the countries. Insert for those countries before to let/ or write Both 3reat Britain and the Cnited 8tates were too closely affected in their interests to let 0nd it would be well for all concerned( for motor drivers and the public alike( if this were made law( instead of fixing a ma'imum speed.PTi#es /rite if the law required this 0nd in order to !ring her to a right understanding( she underwent a system of persecution.P). 4errier. /rite they su!<ected her to for she underwent 5er friendship is too precious to me( not to dou!t my own merits on the one hand( and not to be an'ious for the preservation of it on the other.P.ichardson. /rite % "alue her friendship too highly not to 8ne cannot do good to a man whose mouth has been gagged in order not to hear what he desires for his welfare.PTi#es %rammar suggests that his mouthPor( if indulgent( that hePis not to hearF but the person meant is one /rite one has gagged for has !een gagged %ermany has( alasV victories enough not to add one of the kind which would have been implied in the retirement of 1. ;elcassX.PTi#es It is 4rance( not %ermany( that should not add. /rite without ;rance:s adding %n order to o!tain peace( ordinary battles followed by ordinary victories and ordinary results will only lead to a useless prolongation of the struggle.PTi#es This is a triumph of inconseuence. /rite %f peace is the o!<ect, it should !e re#e#!ered that ordinary It will have occurred to the reader that( while most of the sentences uoted are to be condemned( ob3ection to a few of them might be called pedantic. The fact is that every writer probably breaks the rule often( and escapes notice( other people's( his own( or both. ;ifferent readers( however( will be critical in different degreesF and whoever breaks the rule does so at his own riskF if his offence is noticed( that is hanging evidence against him by itselfF if it is not noticed( it is not an offence. 8f saying on page 1"B Mistakes are #ended so#eti#es !y inserting the su!<ect, we plead %uilty if we were caught in the act( but otherwise !ot %uilty. C. Choice etween the !erund with $re$osition and the infiniti#e( It was said in the preliminary section on the Iarticiple and %erund that writing=the verbal noun or gerundPand to write=the infinitivePare in some sense synonymsF but phrases were given showing that it is by no means always indifferent which of the two is used. It is a matter of idiom rather than of grammarF but this seems the most convenient place for drawing attention to it. To give satisfactory rules would reuire many more e'amples and much more space than can be afforded. $ut something will be gained if students are convinced 617 that many of the mistakes made give sentences the appearance of having been written by a foreigner or one who is not at home with the literary languageF 6"7 that the mistakes are nearly always on one side( the infinitive being the form that should only be used with cautionF 6C7 that a slight change in arrangement may reuire a change from infinitive to gerund or vice versa. a. /hen the infinitive or gerund is attached to a noun( defining or answering the uestion what 6hope( Tc.7 about it( it is almost always better to use the gerund with of/ not uite always( howeverF for instance( an intention to return, usually( and a tendency to think always. The vain hope to !e understood by everybody possessed of a ballot makes us in the >nited )tates perhaps guiltier than public men in %reat $ritain in the use of that monstrous muddled dichotomy 'capital and labour'.PTi#es /hat hopeQPThat of being understood. /rite it so( and treat all the following similarly# The habitual necessity to a#ass Rof amassingS matter for the weekly sermon( set him noting...P1eredith. /e wish to be among the first to felicitate 1r. /hitelaw .eid upon his opportunity to exercise Rof e'ercisingS again the distinguished talents which...P Ti#es 1en lie twenty times in as many hours in the hope to propitiate Rof propitiatingS you.P<orelli. /e left the mound in the twilight( with the design to return Rof returningS the ne't morning.P:merson. The main duties of government were omittedPthe duty to instruct Rof instructingS the ignorant( to supply Rof supplyingS the poor with work and good guidance.P :merson. 1r. 5ay's purpose to preser"e or restore Rof preserving or restoringS the integrity of the administrative entity of <hina has never been abandoned.PTi#es 1y custo# to !e dressed Rof being dressedS for the day( as soon as breakfast is over( ... will make such a step less suspected.P.ichardson. 5e points out that if .ussia accepted the agreement( she would not attain her o!<ect to clear Rof clearingS the situation( inasmuch as...PTi#es /hat accounts for these mistakes is the analogy of forms like# 8ur design was to returnF it is a duty to instructF man has power to interpret 6but the power of interpreting7F it is my custom to be dressed. /hen( however( the noun thus defined is more or less closely fused into a single idea with the verb that governs it( the infinitive becomes legitimate( though seldom necessary. The menace to have secreted )olmes( and that other( that I had thoughts to run away with her foolish brother( ... so much terrified the dear creature...P .ichardson. I passed my childhood here( and had a weakness here to close my life.P $eaconsfield. $efore ten o'clock in the evening( %asca had the satisfaction to see the bridge so well secured that...PIrescott. 0lmagro's followers #ade as little scruple to appropriate to their own use such horses and arms as they could find.PIrescott. 6ad thoughts means was planning/ had a weakness means desired/ had the satisfaction, was pleased/ #ade as little scruple, scrupled as little 0gain( an interval between the noun defined and the infinitive or gerund makes the former more tolerable. The necessity which has confronted the Tokio /ar 8ffice( to enlarge their views of the reuirements of the situation.PTi#es 8r the infinitive is used to avoid a multiplication of of 5e had as much as any man ever had that gift of a great preacher to #ake the oratorical fervour which persuades himself while it lasts into the abiding conviction of his hearers.P&owell. The pastures of Tartary were still remembered by the tenacious practice of the !orsemen to eat horseflesh at religious feasts.P:merson. If the noun has the indefinite article the infinitive is better sometimes. $ut our recognition of it implies a corresponding duty to #ake the most of such advantages.PTi#es ' duty to make# the duty of making. <ompare power and the power above. The following is probably an adaptation 6not to be commended7 of it is necessary for &ussia to secure=for &ussia to secure being regarded as a fused infinitive like the &atin accusative and infinitive. 5is views on the necessity for .ussia to secure the command of the sea...P Ti#es b. Though the gerund with of is the usual construction after nouns( they sometimes prefer the gerund with other prepositions also to the infinitive. The gerund with in should be used( for instance( in the following. $ut euphony operates again in the first. ...the e'traordinary re#issness of the :nglish commanders to utili@e their preponderating strength against the $oers.PTi#es &ord Aenyon reminded the 5ouse of the resistance met with to vaccination( to RofQS the possible effect of the proposal to increase that resistance...PTi#es I think sculpture and painting have an effect to teach us manners and abolish hurry.P:merson. )uch a capitulation would be inconsistent with the position of any %reat Iower( independently of the hu#iliation there would be for :ngland and 4rance to su!#it their agreement for approval and perhaps modification to %ermany.P Ti#es The humiliation there would be in submittingF or the humiliation it would be to submit. c. 0fter verbs and ad3ectives the infinitive is much more commonF but no one will use a gerund where an infinitive is reuired( while many will do the reverse. $ut history accords with the Uapanese practice to show Rin showingS that...P Ti#es /e must necessarily appeal to the intuition( and ai# much more to suggest than to descri!e Rat suggesting than at describingS.P:merson. $ut they can only highly serve us( when they ai# not to drill, but to create Rat drilling( but at creatingS.P:merson. )o far from ai#ing to !e mistress of :urope( she was rapidly sinking into the almost helpless prey of 4rance.PU. .. %reen. This is to avoid ai#ing at !eingF compare the avoidance of double of above. Lose no ti#e, I pray you( to ad"ise=.ichardson. %n ad"ising may have been avoided as ambiguous. :gotism has its root in the cardinal necessity by which each individual persists to !e Rin beingS what he is.P:merson. I do not despair to see Rof seeingS a motor public service.P3uernsey 'd"ertiser Their 3ourneymen are far too declamatory( and too much addicted to su!stitute RsubstitutingS vague and puerile dissertations for solid instruction.P1orley. In the common phrase addicted to drink, drink is a noun( not a verb. 5is blackguard countrymen( always a"erse, as their descendants are( to gi"e RgivingS credit to anybody( for any valuable uality.P$orrow. Is he to !e !la#ed, if he thinks a person would make a wife worth having( to endea"our Rfor endeavouringS to obtain herQP.ichardson. d. If a deferred sub3ect( anticipated by it, is to be verbal( it must of course be either the infinitive or a gerund without preposition. 4ortune( who has generally been ready to gratify my inclinations( provided it cost her very little !y so doing...P$orrow. Note The reason why many who as a rule use the possessive are willing to do without it after verbs like pre"ent is perhaps this# in % pre"ented hi# going they consciously or unconsciously regard both hi# and going as nouns( one the indirect( one the direct ob3ect( as in % refused hi# lea"e RbackS A -od!y /istory and Glossary of the American *an!ua!e It is difficult for many 0mericans to appreciate that they might now be speaking %erman had the %reat .eferendum gone the other way. In post-revolutionary times :nglish and %erman were both widely spoken and a single official language was thought to be needed. :nglish won the .eferendum( but only 3ust. These days 0mericans generally consider their language to be racy and to-the-point. $ut the fact is that it tends towards pomposity. !ot for nothing has it been said that the 0merican language never uses a single word where two will sufficeV :ver since they were liberated from under the heel of the :nglish empire( the 0mericans have been distancing themselves from :nglish and have - in no small measure thanks to a certain 1r /ebster who had a penchant for writing anti-:nglish dictionaries - grown this language of their own. American %n!lish At this moment in time Now Immediately Immediately' ri!ht now' at once Pri#acy 2pron. prye-vasee) Pri#acy 2pron. prih-vasee) Automoile Car Guys' fellers Peo$le 4or (e.g. color) 4our One time Once Two times Twice 4in5 2at the end of a gerund) 4in! Anti4 2pron. ant-eye) Anti4 2pron. ant-ee) 6atri, 2pron. may-trix) 6atri, 2pron. mah-trix) /oo+er Pro' $rostitute Patriotic 2pron. pay-triotic) Patriotic 2pron. pah-triotic) Wal+ 2pron. waak) Wal+ 2pron. wawk) Route 2pron. row-t) Route 2pron. root) Closet Cu$oard To out (i.e. to expose or reveal) To oust Oh' my !aawwwwd7 2usually used by affected women) Gosh7 Sidewal+ Pa#ement %le#ator *ift 6o#ies Pictures' films' flic+s %scalator 6o#in! staircase A$artment Flat %t is intended to include additional exa#ples o"er course of ti#e Gerund Gymnastics As discussed in pre"ious #logs on participles, a gerund is a "er# !orm that ends in ing. 0hat di!!erentiates a gerund !rom a present participle is that the "er# !orm acts as a noun when it1s a gerund. So you might say2 #e sin!s$ They sate$ The %ui& 'rown fo( 'ared at intruders$ There were no gerunds there, 3ust simple "er#s. You can use this !unny "er#4noun thing that1s a gerund to change the !ocus o! the sentence, li*e this2 #e is sin!in!$ They !o satin!$ The %ui& 'rown fo( was 'arin!$ 5,id you *now that a group o! !o)es is called a s*ul*6 Add that to your list o! group names, those o! you who were playing along last autumn with the thesaurus game. 7ut & digress.( The di!!erence #etween this #atch and the !irst #atch o! sentences is passi"e "oice. &n the !irst #atch, the "er# acts on the noun2 he sings, they s*ate, the !o) #ar*ed. &n the second #atch, the "er# still acts on the noun #ut the "er# has changed 5he is, they go, the !o) was(, and now there1s a noun in the predicate2 singing, s*ating, #ar*ing, Some !ol*s consider this "er# !orm to #e a 8complement9 to the "er# 8to #e.9 That 3ust means that the gerund pro"ides that action instead o! the "er#. Gerunds can act li*e nouns in se"eral ways. They can #e the su#3ect o! the sentence and the su#3ect o! the "er#. Sin!in! is fun$ Satin! &an "ae you lau!h$ )arin! is how the fo( warns off predators$ Gerunds can also #e the o#3ect o! a preposition. &n !act, a "er# !ollowing a preposition must #e a gerund. #is Tuesday evenin!s were spent 'y sin!in! with friends$ They were 'uoyed 'y their love of satin!$ The fo( warns off predators 'y 'arin!$ You1ll !ind this usage popular a!ter e)pressions li*e 8there1s no point in,9 8in spite o!,9 8loo* !orward to,9 and so !orth. You can modi!y a gerund, 3ust li*e you can modi!y any other noun, with an ad"er# or an ad3ecti"e. #e en*oyed sin!in! loudly$ #is loud sin!in! woe the nei!h'or$ They were satin! enthusiasti&ally$ Their enthusiasti& satin! involved lots of fallin! down$ The fo( was an!rily 'arin! at intruders$ The fo(+s an!ry 'arin! fri!htened intruders$ You1ll also !ind gerunds as part o! compound nouns, li*e these2 #is sin!in! voi&e was interestin!$ The satin! people ra&ed to the &enter of the rin$ The 'arin! fo( warned off predators$ &n those cases, you could lea"e the gerund out and still ha"e a "ia#le sentence. The gerund in these instances !unctions as an ad3ecti"al modi!ier to the noun. :ere1s a re"iew2 A gerund is an 8ing9 !orm o! a "er# that is the predicate o! the sentence and acts as a noun. A gerund can #e a noun that !orms the su#3ect o! the sentence. A gerund must #e used !ollowing a preposition 5as opposed to another "er# !orm(. A gerund may #e modi!ied #y an ad3ecti"e or an ad"er#, and it may #e used as part o! a compound noun. You can !ind these #logs, a little in!ormation a#out my editorial ser"ices and me, and a collection o! pages a#out my 8real9 li!e on my 0e# site, www.;elanieSpiller.com. posted on Saturday !anuary "" "##$ %&'% A( 4ive types of phrases /hen formulating sentences( students should use the five different phrases. $y using these phrases( students can make their papers appear interesting( informative( and professional. 0 $re$ositional $hrase consists of a preposition and its ob3ect( and any other modifying words. It can shows relationships and generally acts as an ad3ective or adverb. :'amples# o 's reporters of infor#ation to the general pu!lic( 3ournalists must accurately represent the people and events of which they write. o 0uring the awards cere#ony( 0licia Aeys performed her latest hit single. o ;or a paycheck e"ery #onth( she works five days a week. 0n infiniti#e $hrase may act as a noun( ad3ective( or adverb. It consists of the infinitive 6=to= plus the regular form of the verb7 and any other necessary modifiers. :'amples# o To win a gold #edal( athletes must practice often. o To perfor# at the cere#ony( singers auditioned in the fall. o To attend classes at the school( participants must pay Y1(000. 0n a$$ositi#e $hrase renames the noun or pronoun that precedes it. :'amples# o 5er article discussed )pears' new album( Britney( and her first feature film. o Tom <ruise acted in a film( Aanilla 8ky( during "001. o 8ur new coach( >ohn 8#ith( played professional hockey for O years. 0 $artici$al $hrase is a group of words that act as an ad3ective to describe a noun. >nlike !erunds( these phrases are set off by commas. They generally end with -ing( -t( -d( -ed( or -n. :'amples# o *u!lished in &olling 8tone( Uenny :liscu's article coincided with the release of $ritney )pears' single( =I'm 0 )lave H >.= o ;or#ed in the late ,-50s( >" has become the most commercially successful Irish band in the history of popular music. o 6a"ing played soccer in college( Irofessor Uones teaches history and coaches our soccer team. 0 !erund $hrase ends in -ing and acts as a noun. 4ollowed by a verb( the use of a gerund does not reuire a comma. :'amples# o )oaching hockey takes up most of Uohn )mith's time. o 1inning a gold #edal is the biggest achievement for many athletes. o *erfor#ing in co#petitions made her a champion dancer writing. <lick on one of the above links to learn more about editing. 1. %rammar# Traditional .ules( /ord 8rder( 0greement( and <ase Z "E. gerund %erunds are verb forms ending in -ing that act as nouns. They can be the sub3ect of a sentence 6)kiing is her favorite sport7( the ob3ect of a verb 6)he en3oys skiing7( or the ob3ect of a preposition 6)he devoted her free time to skiing7. %erunds can be modified like nouns 6That book makes for difficult reading7. $ut they can also act like verbs in that they can take an ob3ect 6<onvincing him was never easy7 and be modified by an adverb 6/alking daily can improve your health7. 1 gerund and possessives 6fused participle7. )ome people insist that when a gerund is preceded by a noun or pronoun( the noun or pronoun must be in the possessive case. 0ccordingly( it is correct to say I can understand his wanting to go( but incorrect to say I can understand him wanting to go. $ut the construction without the possessive( sometimes called the fused participle( has been used by respected writers for C00 years and is perfectly idiomatic. 1oreover( there is often no way to [fi'\ the construction by inserting the possessive. This is often the case with common nouns. Thus you can say /e have had very few instances of luggage being lost( but not ] of luggage^s being lost. " )ometimes synta' makes using the possessive impossible. <onsider the sentence /hat she ob3ects to is men making more money than women for the same work. <hanging men making to men^s making not only sounds awkward( but it reuires women^s at the other end to keep the sentence parallel( and women^s simply does not work. Ierhaps for these reasons OC percent of the >sage Ianel finds the phrase men making acceptable in this sentence( and another CD percent find it acceptable in informal conte'ts. 8nly 11 percent re3ect it outright. C 5owever( when the construction is more complicated so that a word or phrase intervenes between the noun and the gerund( the panel is less sanguine. 8nly "O percent accept the sentence I can understand him not wanting to go( where the negative not intervenes between the pronoun and the gerund. Thirty-one percent say this sentence is acceptable in informal conte'ts( leaving HH percent who are naysayers. Ianel acceptance drops even further when the synta' gets more complicated. 8nly 1D percent accept the sentence Imagine a child with an ear infection who cannot get penicillin losing his hearing( where both a phrase and a clause intervene between the noun child and the gerund losing. 0nd only 1B percent find this sentence acceptable in informal conte'ts( so that DD percent re3ect it roundly. H $e aware that sometimes nouns ending in -s can be confused with a singular noun in the possessive. Thus I don^t approve of your friend^s going there indicates one friend is going( and I don^t approve of your friends going there indicates that more than one friend is going. O 1ore at participles. D 1. %rammar# Traditional .ules( /ord 8rder( 0greement( and <ase
Z HB. participles uses of participles. 0 participle is a verb form that can be used as an ad3ective and is used with an au'iliary verb to form tenses and( in the case of the past participle( the passive voice. The present participle ends in -ing 6going( running7. The past participle for many verbs ends in -ed 6created( walked7F other past participles have a different form( and often a different vowel( from their base form 6made from make( ridden from ride( swum from swim7. The present participle is used with be to indicate continuing action or state 6I am going. They were laughing. /e have been talking7. The past participle is used with have to form past tenses 6/e have climbed. )he had ridden. They have sung7 and with be to form the passive voice 6The floor is being scrubbed. The ball was kicked. The car has been driven.7. 1 dangling participles. Iarticipial phrases are used chiefly to modify nouns( as in )itting at his desk( he read the letter carefully where the sitting phrase modifies he. It is important to remember that readers will ordinarily associate a participle with the noun or noun phrase that is ad3acent to it. Thus readers will consider a sentence such as Turning the corner( the view was uite different to be an error( for the view did not do the turning. 0 sentence like this needlessly distracts the reader and would be better recast as /hen we turned the corner( the view was uite different or Turning the corner( we had a different view. The problem of dangling participles is treated more broadly under dangling modifiers. " participles and absolute constructions. $e careful not to confuse a participial phrase that modifies a noun with an absolute construction that employs a participle. The difference is between sentences such as Taking down the poster( he went inside and The poster having been taken down( he went inside. 0bsolute constructions can dangle where they please since by their [absolute\ nature they do not modify a specific element in the rest of the sentence. 4or more on this( see absolute constructions. C participles as prepositions. 0 number of e'pressions originally derived from participles have become prepositions( and you can use these to introduce phrases that are not associated with the immediately ad3acent noun phrase. )uch e'pressions include concerning( considering( failing( granting( 3udging by( and speaking of. Thus you can say without fear of criticism )peaking of politics( the elections have been postponed or <onsidering the hour( it is surprising that he arrived at all. H participles as ad3ectives. 1any participles can also function as ad3ectives# an interesting e'perience( an interested customerF the surprising results( the surprised researchers. $ut it is often hard to tell when a participle is an ad3ective( especially with past participles. &inguists have a number of tests for confirming an ad3ective. 5ere are four of them# <an the word be used attributively 6i.e.( before the noun it modifies7( as in an intriguing offer. <an it be used in the predicate( especially after the verb seem( as in )he thought the party boring and 5e seems concerned about you. <an it be compared( as in /e are even more encouraged now and The results are most encouraging. <an it be modified by very( as in They are very worried about this. O )ome ad3ectives pass more of these tests than others and are thus more purely ad3ectival. ;isastrous( for instance( passes tests 1( "( and C( but not H. /hen used as ad3ectives( most participles pass all four tests( but modification by very is tricky. 4or more on this( see very and past participles. D Kou can tell that a past participle is really part of a passive verbPand not an ad3ectivePwhen it is followed by a by prepositional phrase that has a personal agent as its ob3ect. Thus( the participle married would be part of the verb in the sentence <huck and /endy were married by a bishop but used as an ad3ective in the sentence <huck and /endy were happily married for about si' months. To confirm the ad3ectival status of a participle( try transforming the sentence to see if the participle can come before the noun# 4or about si' months <huck and /endy were a happily married couple. B The !ew ;ictionary of <ultural &iteracy( Third :dition. "00". gerund 6U:.-uhnd7 0 form of a verb that ends in -ing and operates as a noun in a sentence# [Thinking can be painful.\ 1 Continuous cate!ories stren!then diachronic theory /hitney Tabor 4ri. 10#00-11#H0 $ :arly variable rule models 6e.g.( /einreich( &abov( and 5er,og 1?DE( /olfram 1?D?( &abov 1?D?7 proposed that uantitative information should be included in grammatical description( although they put little constraint on what rules could be variable and what probabilities could be assigned to the rules. .ecent studies in historical synta' 6e.g.( Aroch 1?E?( Iint,uk 1??1( Taylor 1??H7 push the notion much further by hypothesi,ing that probabilities are associated with highly abstract syntactic parameters. Thus all the linguistic e'pressions a given parameter controls are e'pected to e'hibit parallel uantitative change. :ven these =Jariable Iarameter= models( however( stop short of proposing a link between uantitative properties of the data and the choice about which parameters to activate. In this sense( uantitative and categorical information remain neatly separated. $y contrast( Tabor 1??O describes a model which predicts strong interaction between uantitative and categorical features of grammatical representation. This model( implemented in a <onnectionist network( may aptly be called a =<ontinuous <ategory 1odel= 6<<17 for it replaces the discrete categories of standard grammars with clusters of points in a continuous space. Two predictions about syntactic change distinguish <<1s from the Jariable Iarameter models# 617 persistent uantitative change can lead to categorical changeF 6"7 the ordering of categorical changes will reflect the distributional similarity structure of the data---if type $ is intermediate between type 0 and type <( then a change from 0 to < will proceed via $. These two claims are not at odds with the Jariable Iarameter models but they reflect a further strengthening of the variationist hypothesis( since those models do not make any predictions about the relative timing of categorical changes. :vidence for claim 617 has been provided by Tabor 1??C( 1??H( and 1??O. 5ere( I show how data from the history of the :nglish gerund support claim 6"7. 1any researchers have found evidence that over the course of the 1iddle :nglish period( the gerund acuired an increasingly =verbal= character 6e.g.( Ioutsma 1?"C( 1osse 1?CE( Ta3ima 1?EO7. The -ung ancestor of the modern -ing first spread across a wider and wider set of verbs 6late 8:7( then began to occur in con3uction with prepositional complements 6c. 1"007( then with direct ob3ects 6c. 1C007( and ultimately spread to passive and perfect constructions 6late 1O00's7. 0bney 1?EB notes that this chronology is consistent with a proposal by Uackendoff 1?BB that the history of the gerund involved the accommodation of a series of successively more abstract JIs under the scope of the gerundial affi'. I show how a <<1 implemented in a <onnectionist network and trained on the distributional data generated by UackendoffL0bney's grammar( correctly predicts the ordering of the changes. This result provides evidence that measurement of relative similarity 6the bread and butter of <<1s7 is a crucial ingredient in grammatical representation. It also indicates that variable parameter models would do well to replace the parameter independence assumption with a claim about parameter interaction. 4inally it illustrates a method for combining the structural insights of standard( discrete category grammars with the historical modeling advantages of <<1s. En!lish:Gerund From Wi+ioo+s 8 %n!lish 8 6edit7 Parts of s$eech" 0 - 1 - " - C - H - O - D - B - E - 9 - 10 - 11 - 1" - 1C - 1H - 1O - 1D %erunds are nouns built from a verb with an '-ing' suffi'. They can be used as the sub3ect of a sentence( an ob3ect( or an ob3ect of preposition. They can also be used to complement a sub3ect. 8ften( gerunds e'ist side-by-side with nouns that come from the same root but the gerund and the common noun have different shades of meaning. :'amples# breath and !reathing( knowledge and knowing. :'amples of gerunds as the sub3ect of a sentence are# Backpacking is a rewarding pastime. 8tretching can loosen up muscles. !o s#oking. 6I.e.( no smoking is allowed L you may not smoke here.7 0s an ob3ect# /e all love to go !owling on the weekend. 5e loves eating chips. 0n ob3ect of preposition# They complained of hearing strange sounds from the ne't cabin. They sang about !eing eaten by bears to allay their fears. 0nd as a complement to a sub3ect# 8ne of the most dangerous things to do on the lake is ice$skating. Partici$les are forms of verbs which are used as ad3ectives. In present participles( you usually add 'ing' to the end. Therefore# Talk becomes talking >u#p becomes <u#ping Dpen becomes opening 8ee becomes seeing In past participles( you usually add 'ed' to the end. Therefore# Talk becomes talked >u#p becomes <u#ped Dpen becomes opened 5owever( 8ee becomes seen !otice how the irregular verb see also did not have a regular past participle. 1ore irregular verbs with irregular past participles are# Be( !een Break( !roken 9at( eaten 8lide( slid 0s with most irregular words( there is no good 'general rule' which applies( but often 'ed' is replaced by 'en'. 0 Iarticiple is a word derived from a verb( participating the properties of a verb( and of an ad3ective or a nounF and is generally formed by adding ing( d( or ed( to the verb# thus( from the verb rule( are formed three participles( two simple and one compoundF as( 1. ruling( ". ruled( C. having ruled. :nglish verbs( not defective( have severally three participlesF which have been very variously denominated( perhaps the most accurately thus# the Imperfect( the Ierfect( and the Ireperfect. 8r( as their order is undisputed( they may he conveniently called the 4irst( the )econd( and the Third. The Imperfect participle is that which ends commonly in ing( and implies a continuance of the being( action( or passion# as( being( acting( ruling( loving( defending( terminating. The Ierfect participle is that which ends commonly in ed or en( and implies a completion of the being( action( or passion# as( been( acted( ruled( loved( defended( terminated. The Ireperfect participle is that which takes the sign having( and implies a previous completion of the being( action( or passion# as( having loved( having seen( having writtenF having been loved( having been writing( having been written. The 4irst or Imperfect Iarticiple( when simple( is always formed by adding ing to the radical verbF as( look( looking# when compound( it is formed by prefi'ing being to some other simple participleF as( being reading( being read( being completed. The )econd or Ierfect Iarticiple is always simple( and is regularly formed by adding d or ed to the radical verb# those verbs from which it is formed otherwise( are either irregular or redundant. The Third or Ireperfect Iarticiple is always compound( and is formed by prefi'ing having to the perfect( when the compound is double( and having been to the perfect or the imperfect( when the compound is triple# as( having spoken( having been spoken( having been speaking. ReditS %,am$les 5e is tal+in! to her. They are 1um$in! into the pool. /e had eaten the pie. :ach of these cases has a verb acting as an ad3ective( describing the sub3ect. In case you were wondering( 'had' plus a past participle is called a $ast $erfect. 0 part of the te't in this article( was taken from the public domain :nglish grammar =The %rammar of :nglish %rammars= 6http(EEwwwguten!ergnetEetextE,,F,27 by %oold $rown( 1EO1. .etrieved from =http#LLen.wikibooks.orgLwikiL:nglish#Iarticiple= Interacti#e Phrase :ui0 ;< 1. 1arta fell o#er the cat( a. infinitive phrase b. appositive c. gerund phrase d. prepositional phrase e. clause f. participial phrase ". Pretendin! to e aslee$( the hiker escaped the bear. a. infinitive phrase b. appositive c. gerund phrase d. prepositional phrase e. clause f. participial phrase C. )usan )arandon( a famous actress( has been very supportive of the striking workers. a. infinitive phrase b. appositive c. gerund phrase d. prepositional phrase e. clause f. participial phrase H. To finish the marathon in less than fi#e hours is Tom's goal. a. infinitive phrase b. appositive c. gerund phrase d. prepositional phrase e. clause f. participial phrase O. )he preferred eatin! at the local deli for lunch. a. infinitive phrase b. appositive c. gerund phrase d. prepositional phrase e. clause f. participial phrase D. 5e should discover a gift certificate for dinner at Cafe Sofia under his seat at the table. a. infinitive phrase b. appositive c. gerund phrase d. prepositional phrase e. clause f. participial phrase B. 0fter learnin! the $arts of s$eech( the class began studying punctuation. a. infinitive phrase b. appositive c. gerund phrase d. prepositional phrase e. clause f. participial phrase E. The candidate elected y the #oters promised to put =a chicken in every pot.= a. infinitive phrase b. appositive c. gerund phrase d. prepositional phrase e. clause f. participial phrase ?. /ill someone be here soon to o$en the doorQ a. infinitive phrase b. appositive c. gerund phrase d. prepositional phrase e. clause f. participial phrase 10. -eli#erin! the $i00a on time became his single mission. a. infinitive phrase b. appositive c. gerund phrase d. prepositional phrase e. clause f. participial phrase 11. The woman who led the wor+sho$ used to be a math teacher. a. infinitive phrase b. appositive c. gerund phrase d. prepositional phrase e. clause f. participial phrase 1". Frustrated with the delays( :rin tried to break her dog out of uarantine. a. infinitive phrase b. appositive c. gerund phrase d. prepositional phrase e. clause f. participial phrase 1C. Tom visited India while studying the history of Indian art. a. infinitive phrase b. appositive c. gerund phrase d. prepositional phrase e. clause f. participial phrase 1H. While she loo+ed ehind the house( the rest of us searched the local parks for the puppy. a. infinitive phrase b. appositive c. gerund phrase d. prepositional phrase e. clause f. participial phrase 1O. Tom 5anks( star of &Philadel$hia( will be appearing in a new film this holiday season. a. infinitive phrase b. appositive c. gerund phrase d. prepositional phrase e. clause f. participial phrase 1D. $efore $uttin! too much effort into the $ro1ect( maybe you should get some guidance from your boss. a. infinitive phrase b. appositive c. gerund phrase d. prepositional phrase e. clause f. participial phrase 1B. The car that -e#on sold to the dealershi$ has been wrecked twice. a. infinitive phrase b. appositive c. gerund phrase d. prepositional phrase e. clause f. participial phrase 1E. ;oes the captain want us to lower the sails before we enter the harborQ a. infinitive phrase b. appositive c. gerund phrase d. prepositional phrase e. clause f. participial phrase 1?. )he liked the shirt !i#en to her y her !randmother. a. infinitive phrase b. appositive c. gerund phrase d. prepositional phrase e. clause f. participial phrase "0. ;id you really think that roin! a an+ would solve your problemsQ a. infinitive phrase b. appositive c. gerund phrase d. prepositional phrase e. clause f. participial phrase To ta+e the second interacti#e =ui0 on $hrases' $lease turn the $a!e( The gerund phrase includes the gerund and the ob3ect of the gerund or any modifiers related to the gerund.