LOAD CALC spreadsheet

Bridge Name: Jim Creek

Bridge No. : 42
Purpose: Provide a calc tool to assemble loading data needed for foundation calcs or as needed.
Loading: DEAD LOADS
Input:
Geometry: Reference:
Span 112 ft
Width 50 ft
Girder width 5.5 ft
Total Bridge Area 5600 sf
Material:
Reinforced Concrete 155 pcf TA 3.5.1-1
Steel 490 pcf
asphalt 140 pcf
Superstructure:
Type Bulb-tee girder Railing type Steel - snoco rail
Girder ID W 53_DG Railing Dims:
Girder SW 1000 plf W_avg 320 plf
Overlay_max 6 in L 224 ft
Curb Bike rail Included above
Ht 0 ft Size HSS 2 x 0.125
W 0 ft Wt 0 plf
L 0 ft L 224 ft
Diaphragms: 1/3 points Sidewalk
Spacing 37.33333 ft Ht 0 ft
Ht 4 ft W 0 ft
W 1 ft L 112 ft
Substructure:
Abutment / pile cap: Wingwall:
Ht 20 ft Ht 20 ft
W 3 ft W 3 ft
L 55.5 ft L 20 ft
Calc:
DL_girder 182 psf 1018 kip
DL_acp 70 psf 392 kip
DL_rail 320 plf 72 kip
DL_sidewalk 0 plf 0 kip
DL_curb 0 plf 0 kip
DL_diaphragm 4 psf 23 kip
DL_bike rail 0 plf 0 kip
Total Super DL 1504 kip
Super DL @ Support 752 kip
DL_abutment 1032 kip 1032 kip
DL_wingwall 372 kip 372 kip
Total Sub DL (both ends) 1404 kip
Total Sub DL (one end) 702.15
Total Support DL 1454 kip
DL / ft @ footing Total DL / abutment width 26.2 k/ ft
Approach Slab:
Depth 1.083333 ft
Length 15 ft
Width 49 ft
Total Slab DL 123.4188 k
LOAD CALC spreadsheet
Bridge Name: Jim Creek
Bridge No. : 42
Purpose: Provide a calc tool to assemble loading data needed for foundation calcs or as needed.
Loading: LIVE LOADS
Code: AASHTO 2010 Bridge Design Specifications
Input: Reference:
Out-to-out width 37 ft
Sidewalk 0 ft
Bridge rails 3 ft
Pedestrian lane no
L_span 108 ft
Curb-to-curb width 34 ft
No. of vehicle lanes 2 Lanes AASHTO 3.6.1.1.1
Total lanes 3 Lanes
Factors:
Multiple Presence Factor calc: 0.85 AASHTO 3.6.1.1.2
Dynamic Load Allowance, IM: 1.33 AASHTO 3.6.2.1
Vehicle Live Load:
Design Truck:

14' 14' to 30'
8 k 32 k 32 k
LL_truck_1 8 k AASHTO 3.6.1.2.2, 3
LL_truck_2 32 k
Design Tandem
4 ft
25 k 25 k
LL_tandem 25 k AASHTO 3.6.1.2.3
Design Lane Load
LL_design lane 0.64 klf AASHTO 3.6.1.2.4
LL Combinations: AASHTO 3.6.1.3.1
1. Design Tandem + Design Lane Load All spans
or
2. Design Truck + Design Lane Load All spans
or
3. 90% two trucks over interior support + 90% lane load Multiple span only
CASE 1 - DESIGN TANDEM
s_1 s_2
LL_tandem AASHTO 3.6.1.2.3
R_max
s_1 4 ft
s_2 104 ft
R_tandem_max 25k + (s_2 / L_span ) x 25k 49 k
CASE 2 - DESIGN TRUCK
s s
AASHTO 3.6.1.2.3
R_max
s 14 ft
R_truck_max 32k + 32 (L-s/L) + 8 (L- 2s / L) 66 k
LL CALC CHECK: CASE 2 GOVERNS
LL_max truck 66 k / lane / end
DESIGN LANE LOAD
LL_lane L_span (LL_design load) / 2 ends 36 k / lane / end
DESIGN LANE LOAD + DESIGN TRUCK
LL_lane+truck LL_max truck * IM + LL_lane 123 k / lane / end
Total Support LL LL_max lane ( Total lanes) (MPF) 314 k / end
25k 25k
32k 32k 8k
LOAD CALC spreadsheet
Bridge Name: Jim Creek
Bridge No. : 42
Purpose: Provide a calc tool to assemble loading data needed for foundation calcs or as needed.
Loading: SEISMIC
References: Snoco geotech report dated 12/09/2009.
2010 AASHTO Bridge Design Specs.
Input:
AASHTO:
PGA Acceleration Coefficient 0.33 g Fig 3.10.2.1-1
K_h Horiz. Accel coefficient / yielding wall 0.5 A
Dynamic rectangular pressure increment 4 H
Site Class N = 100 blows/ft @ bedrock C TA 3.10.3.1-1
Site Factors:
F_pga Site factor @ zero period 1.07 TA 3.10.3.2-1
A_s Acceleration coefficient = PGA x F_pga 0.3531 3.10.9.1
EQ A_s x permanent dead load (DC, DD, DW) 4.7.4.2
LOAD CALC spreadsheet
Bridge Name: Jim Creek
Bridge No. : 42
Purpose: Determine LC and factors required for abutment seismic design.
Load Combinations
Reference 2010 AASHTO Bridge Design Specs.
TA 3.4.1-1
NOTES
Wind loading at this location is generally low and will be neglected for abutment design.
Per 3.4.1 use Extreme event I for EQ event.
Per TA 3.4.1-2 determine load factor, gamma_p, for permanent loads.
max min
EQ - earthquake loading 1 1
DC - components / attachments 1.25 0.9
DW - wearing surfaces and utilities 1.5 0.65
EH - active 1.5 0.9
EH - passive 1.35 0.9
EV - stability 1 na
EV - abutments 1.35 1
WA, FR -- neglect
LL -- assume zero / 110 ft span / low ADT
Per TA 3.4.1-3 determine load factor, gamma_p, for permanent loads.
Load combinations:
Extreme event 1 1.0 E + 1.25 DC + 1.5 DW + 1.5 EH_active + 0.9 EH_passive + 1.0 EV
1.0 E + 1.25 DC + 1.5 DW + 1.5 EH_active + 0.9 EH_passive + 1.0 EV
LOAD CALC spreadsheet
Bridge Name: JimCreek
Bridge No. : 42 W_super
V_2
Purpose: Calculate max applied bearing.
Reference: AASHTO Figure 11.6.3.2-1
beta
EQ
MATERIALS: notes: Reference
Service limit state, DL + LL Max allowable bearing pressure 20 ksf TA C10.6.2.6.1-1
Strength 1 limit state Ultimate bearing pressure = 1.5 x service 30 ksf TA C10.6.2.6.1-1
F_t
Retained fill
LOADS:
DL 752
LL 314
DL + LL 1067 k
LL_vehicle surcharge 0.250 ksf
Footing length 55.5 ft
Footing width 15 ft
Area 832.5 sf
P_super DL+LL 1.281298462 ksf W_1 V_1
A_s Acceleration coefficient 0.3531
EQ_super DL 265.603104 k
EQ_wall DL 690.2508154 k h H
EQ_soil 80 psf
DL_wingwall 372 k
GEOMETRY:
toe 3 ft
wall 3 ft
heel 9 ft
ftg thickness 2 ft
B toe + wall + heel 15 ft
H max height 20 ft
h H + heel tan (beta) 20.31428693 ft
toe W_2
CALCULATIONS:
beta angle of fill fromhorizontal 0.034906585 rad 2 %max grade
gamma unit weight , gravel borrow 130 pcf
delta friction angle between fill and wall 0.523598776 rad 30 degrees TA 3.11.5.3-1
theta angle of back face of wall to horizontal 1.570796327 rad 90 degrees
phi_f effective angle of internal friction 0.558505361 rad 32 degrees assumes 1.5 x delta
Lambda calculated factor for k_a calc 2.889803869 3.11.5.3-2
k_af active pressure coefficient for backfill 0.287370357
Service check - TA 3.4.1-1 1.0 DL + 1.0 LL + 1.0 EH
V_1 weight of soil 1293.705 k
X_1 soil lever 3 ft
V_2 weight of soil due to beta 12.15902828 k
X_2 soil lever 6 ft
W_1 weight of walls / superstructure 1954.83097 k
X_w1 wall lever 3 ft
W_2 weight of footing 258.075 k
F_T 0.5 gamma_f h^2 k_af 427.81053 k
e Fig 11.6.3.2-2 1.34301884 ft OK
Is e > B/6 ? NO TRAPEZOIDAL DIST
Sigma_max sumV_i / A *(1 + 6 e / B) 6.497393103 ksf Service limit OK
Sigma_min sumV_i / A *(1 - 6 e / B) 1.956108393 ksf Service limit OK
Strength 1 check - TA 3.4.1-1 1.25 DL + 1.75 LL + 1.5 EH
V_1 weight of soil 1679.56875 k
X_1 soil lever 3 ft
V_2 weight of soil due to beta 15.19878534 k
X_2 soil lever 6 ft
W_1 weight of walls / superstructure 2600.777379 k
X_w1 wall lever 3 ft
W_2 weight of footing 322.59375 k
F_T 0.5 gamma_f h^2 k_af 641.7157972 k
e Fig 11.6.3.2-2 1.492400765 ft OK
Is e > B/6 ? NO TRAPEZOIDAL DIST
Sigma_max sumV_i / A *(1 + 6 e / B) 9.233827847 ksf Strength limit OK
Sigma_min sumV_i / A *(1 - 6 e / B) 2.23578762 ksf Strength limit OK
Strength 1 check - TA 3.4.1-1 0.9 DL + 1.5 EH
V_1 weight of soil 1051.947 k
X_1 soil lever 3 ft
V_2 weight of soil due to beta 10.94312545 k
X_2 soil lever 6 ft
W_1 weight of walls / superstructure 1476.318273 k
X_w1 wall lever 3 ft
W_2 weight of footing 232.2675 k
F_T 0.5 gamma_f h^2 k_af 641.7157972 k
e Fig 11.6.3.2-2 1.954477434 OK
Is e > B/6 ? YES TRIANGULAR DIST _+ UPLIFT
Sigma_max sumV_i / A *(1 + 6 e / B) 6.003221767 ksf Strength limit OK
Sigma_min sumV_i / A *(1 - 6 e / B) 0 ksf Strength limit OK
Extreme Event 1 check - TA 3.4.1-1 0.9 DL + 1.5 EH + 1.0 EQ (active pressure / no passive pressure)
V_1 weight of soil 1051.947 k
X_1 soil lever 3 ft
V_2 weight of soil due to beta 10.94312545 k
X_2 soil lever 6 ft
W_1 weight of walls / superstructure 1476.318273 k
X_w1 wall lever 3 ft
W_2 weight of footing 232.2675 k
F_T 0.5 gamma_f h^2 k_af 641.7157972 k
e Fig 11.6.3.2-2 5.454627812 ft OK
Is e > B/6 ? YES TRIANGULAR DIST _+ UPLIFT
Sigma_max sumV_i / A *(1 + 6 e / B) 16.27625621 ksf Strength limit OK
Sigma_min sumV_i / A *(1 - 6 e / B) 0 ksf Strength limit OK
Extreme Event 1 check - TA 3.4.1-1 0.9 DL + 0.9 EH - 1.0 EQ ( active pressure / no passive pressure)
V_1 weight of soil 1051.947 k
X_1 soil lever 3 ft
V_2 weight of soil due to beta 10.94312545 k
X_2 soil lever 6 ft
W_1 weight of walls / superstructure 1476.318273 k
X_w1 wall lever 3 ft
W_2 weight of footing 232.2675 k
F_T 0.5 gamma_f h^2 k_af 385.0294783
e Fig 11.6.3.2-2 -3.929906279 OK
Is e > B/6 ? YES TRIANGULAR DIST _+ UPLIFT
Sigma_max sumV_i / A *(1 + 6 e / B) 9.324965779 ksf Strength limit OK
Sigma_min sumV_i / A *(1 - 6 e / B) 0 ksf Strength limit OK
LOAD CALC spreadsheet
Bridge Name: Jim Creek
Bridge No. : 42
Purpose: Check prestress beam design.
Date: 10/14/2011
Material: Notes:
f'c 6.5 ksi Beam compressive design compressive strength
f's 270 ksi Prestressing strands design tensile strength
f'ci 5.5 ksi Compressive strength @ initial prestress
Wc 150 pcf Concrete density
Ec 4887.7334 ksi Wc^1.5 x 33 (f'cs)^0.5
W_acp 140 pcf Asphalt density
fci 3.3 ksi 0.6 f'ci, temp stress limit prior to losses
fi 556.21489 psi 7.5 (f'ci)^0.5, tension stress limit prior to losses
fcs 2.6 ksi 0.4 f'c, compression strength limit after losses (after concrete cure)
fts 241.86773 psi 3 (f'c)^0.5, tensile strength limit after losses
Loads:
W 1000 plf beam weight
Wcp 314 plf Curb and parapet weight
Ws 384.66667 plf Superimposed deal load. Assume 4" max overlay.
Geometry:
W_girder 6 ft Max girder width
H_girder 4.4166667 ft Girder height
I_girder: 651022 in4 T-beam moment of inertia
S_t: 33952 in3 T-beam section modulus (top)
S_b: 19247 in3 T-beam section modulus (bottom)
L_span 110 ft Bridge span
Calcs:
Distribution factor:
S_max 5.75 ft
Distribution factor: 1.0454545 S/5.5, per old AASHTO code
2010 AASHTO:
K 2 TA 4.6.2.2.2b-1
W 50
L 110
C 0.9090909 CALC 'D' Use D = 11.5 - NL K(W/L)
D:
N_L 3 no. of lanes
D 8.5
Distribution factor: 0.6764706 S / D
Multiple Presence Factor: 0.85
Impact load factor: 1.33
M_o 1512.5 k-ft w_t beam x l^2 / 8
M_sdl 474.925 k-ft w_acp+parapet x l^2 / 8
M_HS20 TRK 1703.6 k Use Table (PPI pg 63)
M_trk train 968 k-ft 0.64 klf x l^2 / 8
V_o 55 k w x L / 2
V_sdl 17.27 k w_acp+parapet x L / 2
V_HS20 TRK 61.2 k
V_trk train 35.2 k
M_L+I 1510.1219 k-ft (M_HS20 + M_trk train)/2 wheel lines x Impact x MPF = max live load moment / beam
M_DL 1987.425 k-ft M_o + M_sdl
V_L+I 54.4901 k (V_HS20 + V_trk train)/2 wheel lines x Impact x MPF = max live load shear / beam
V_DL 72.27 k V_o + V_sdl
M_u 5245.7258 k-ft 1.25M_o + 1.5Msdl + 1.75M_L+I
V_u 190.01268 k 1.25 V_o + 1.5 V_sdl + 1.75 V_L+I
E_c 4887.7334 ksi Modulus of Elasticity
F_strand: Determine max force for 1/2", seven wire strand
Ultimate strength 189 ksi 70% of max tensile stress 270 ksi = ultimate
A_1/2" seven wire 0.153 in2
F_strand 28.917 k
Total no. of strands 32
% harped 33%
No. of harped strands 11
Harped c-g from t/slab 6 in
As_harped 1.683 in2
No. of straight strands 21
Straight c-g from t/slab 49.5 in
As_straight 3.213 in2
Span 110
Station L(x) e_harped As_harped x e_harped e_straight
0 0 6 10.098 49.5
0.05 5.5 11.4375 19.2493125 49.5
0.1 11 16.875 28.400625 49.5
0.15 16.5 22.3125 37.5519375 49.5
0.2 22 27.75 46.70325 49.5
0.25 27.5 33.1875 55.8545625 49.5
0.3 33 38.625 65.005875 49.5
0.35 38.5 44.0625 74.1571875 49.5
0.4 44 49.5 83.3085 49.5
0.45 49.5 49.5 83.3085 49.5
0.5 55 49.5 83.3085 49.5
0.55 60.5 49.5 83.3085 49.5
0.6 66 49.5 83.3085 49.5
0.65 71.5 44.0625 74.1571875 49.5
0.7 77 38.625 65.005875 49.5
0.75 82.5 33.1875 55.8545625 49.5
0.8 88 27.75 46.70325 49.5
0.85 93.5 22.3125 37.5519375 49.5
0.9 99 16.875 28.400625 49.5
0.95 104.5 11.4375 19.2493125 49.5
1 110 6 10.098 49.5
Beam compressive design compressive strength
Prestressing strands design tensile strength
Compressive strength @ initial prestress
0.6 f'ci, temp stress limit prior to losses
7.5 (f'ci)^0.5, tension stress limit prior to losses
0.4 f'c, compression strength limit after losses (after concrete cure)
3 (f'c)^0.5, tensile strength limit after losses
Curb and parapet weight
Superimposed deal load. Assume 4" max overlay.
T-beam moment of inertia
T-beam section modulus (top)
T-beam section modulus (bottom)
S/5.5, per old AASHTO code
w_acp+parapet x l^2 / 8
(M_HS20 + M_trk train)/2 wheel lines x Impact x MPF = max live load moment / beam
(V_HS20 + V_trk train)/2 wheel lines x Impact x MPF = max live load shear / beam
1.25M_o + 1.5Msdl + 1.75M_L+I
1.25 V_o + 1.5 V_sdl + 1.75 V_L+I
Determine max force for 1/2", seven wire strand
70% of max tensile stress 270 ksi = ultimate
As_straight x e_straight c-g (from top) e (from c-g)
159.0435 34.546875 15.37229873
159.0435 36.41601563 17.24143935
159.0435 38.28515625 19.11057998
159.0435 40.15429688 20.9797206
159.0435 42.0234375 22.84886123
159.0435 43.89257813 24.71800185
159.0435 45.76171875 26.58714248
159.0435 47.63085938 28.4562831
159.0435 49.5 30.32542373
159.0435 49.5 30.32542373
159.0435 49.5 30.32542373
159.0435 49.5 30.32542373
159.0435 49.5 30.32542373
159.0435 47.63085938 28.4562831
159.0435 45.76171875 26.58714248
159.0435 43.89257813 24.71800185
159.0435 42.0234375 22.84886123
159.0435 40.15429688 20.9797206
159.0435 38.28515625 19.11057998
159.0435 36.41601563 17.24143935
159.0435 34.546875 15.37229873
LOAD CALC spreadsheet
Bridge Name: Jim Creek
Bridge No. : 42
Purpose: Explore TL-4 loading effects on Oregon and Colorado standard barrier connections.
Notes: For purposes of these calculations, simplified loading distributions will be assumed. Distributions are based on the assumption of continuous HSS 5x5 railing.
Reference: 2010 AASHTO LRFD Bridge Specifications
Loading: AASHTO Table A13.2-1
Geometry:
H_e Effective vehicle height 32 in
L_t / L_l Distribution length, transverse / longitudinal 3.5 ft
L_v Vertical load distribution length 18 ft
H Height of rail 35 in
gage_t Bolt gage_t 9 in
gage_l Bolt gage_l 10 in
Loads:
Assumptions:
Loads in TA A13.2-1 are factored and represent ultimate loads.
F_t Transverse load 55 k
F_v Vertical load 4.5 k
F_l Longitudinal load 18 k
Mu_x F_t / 2 x H 962.5 in-kip
Vu_x F_t / 2 27.5 k
Mu_y F_l / 2 x H 315 in-kip
Vu_y F_l / 2 9 k
Bolt check:
T_u 1 E Mu / gage x 1/2 69.22 k
V_u 1 (Vu_x^2 + Vu_y^2)^ 0.5 / 4 7.23 k
T_u 2 Mux / gage x 1/2 48.125 k
V_u 2 (Vu_x^2 + Vu_y^2)^ 0.5 / 4 7.23 k
T_u 3 Muy / gage x 1/2 15.75 k
V_u 3 (Vu_x^2 + Vu_y^2)^ 0.5 / 4 7.23 k
T_u 4 By inspection --> compression 0 k
V_u 4 (Vu_x^2 + Vu_y^2)^ 0.5 / 4 7.23 k
Explore TL-4 loading effects on Oregon and Colorado standard barrier connections.
For purposes of these calculations, simplified loading distributions will be assumed. Distributions are based on the assumption of continuous HSS 5x5 railing.
Notes / reference:
Prior to overlay. 32" minimum.
3 4
1 2
Calculation worksheet:
SPM
6/10/2014
Purpose: Summarize material properties
t
Input:
Winwall length, D 12 ft NA
Ftg thickness, typ 4 ft
Wingwall thickness, typ 2 ft
Ftg length 44 ft b
Moment of Intertia table: I = b_i x h_i ^3 / 12 + A_i x d_i ^ 2
Element Name b_i h_i A_i d_i I_i A d^2 I_t
1 footing 44 4 176 2 234.6667 704 938.6667
2 wingwall 2 12 24 6 288 864 1152
3 wingwall 2 12 24 6 288 864 1152
A_total 224 in2
A_i x d_i 640
NA Sum (A_i x d_i )/ Sum A_i 2.857143 ft
Moment of Inertia I_total 3243 ft4
Section Modulus S = I / c
c_t 2.857143 ft S_t 1135 ft3
c_b 9.142857 S_b 355 ft3
Bearing calc spreadsheet
Bridge Name: Jim Creek
Bridge No. : 42
Purpose: Size rectangular steel reinforced elastomeric bearings.
Reference: AASHTO 14.7.5.1 / Method B
LOADS:
DL 752 k
LL 314 k
sigma_s (DL + LL) / Bearing Area 1.2345845 ksi OK
sigma_l LL / Bearing Area 0.3639784 ksi OK
1.66 x G x S 1.6 ksi max 1.3892491 ksi OK
0.66 x G x S 0.552352 ksi
GEOMETRY:
L, length of bearing parallel to longitudinal axis of girder 6 in
W, width of bearing transverse to longitudinal axis of girder 16 in
H, bearing height 3 in
S, shape factor LW / (2 h_i x (L+W)) 6.44
t, gage thickness of steel plate 12 gage steel 0.1046
n, number of plates 6
n_e, number of elastomeric layers n + 1 7
h_i, elastomeric layer thickness 0.3389143 in
h_rt, total elastormeric thickness n_e x h_i 2.3724 in
MATERIALS:
G, Elastomer shear modulus 0.13 ksi Durometer 60
Temp zone C Figure 14.7.5.2-1
Min low temp elastomer grade 3
CALCS:
Initial bearing deflection:
delta_le, live load strain sigma_l / (6 G S^2) 0.0112596
delta_l, live load deflection Sum_i (delta_le x h_ri) 0.0267123 in OK Assume 1/8 in max
delta_de, dead load strain (sigma_t - sigma_l) / (6 G S^2) 0.0269321
delta_d, dead load deflection Sum_i (delta_de x h_ri) 0.0638936 in OK
Long-term dead load deflection:
a_cr, creep deflection / dead load deflection ref. TA 14.7.6.2-1 0.35
delta_lt, long-term dead load deflection delta_d + a_cr x delta__d 0.0862564 in
Shear deformation:
alpha thermal coefficient 0.0000067 1/deg F
T_max max design temp 100 deg F Fig 3.12.2.2-1
T_min min design temp 10 deg F Fig 3.12.2.2-2
delta_t, temperature displacement: alpha x L (T_max - T_min) 0.810432 in
delta_s, maximum shear deformation: 65% delta_t 0.5267808 in
h_rt min 2 x delta_s 1.0535616 in OK
Check combined compression and rotation:
theta_max @ service sigma_s (n / G S) (h_ri / B) ^2 0.023534 Uplift check per 14.7.5.3.5-1
delta max theta max / 2 * (L/2) 7.907429 in OK (by inspection)
theta_max @ service (sigma_s / 1.875 G S - 1) n ( h_ri / B )^2 0.0238119 Compressive stress check per 14.5.3.5-2
Stability check:
A 1.92 h_rt/L / (1+ 2 L/ W)^0.5 0.5738771 14.7.5.3.6-2
B 2.67 / ((S + 2) (1 + L/ 4W)) 0.2893148 14.7.5.3.6-3
sigma_s max G S / (A - B) 2.9409982 OK
Calculation worksheet:
SPM
6/10/2014
Purpose: Summarize material properties
Input:
Stem width 0.5 ft
Stem height 4.416666667 ft
Bulb width 1.583333333 ft
Bulb depth 0.5 ft
Bulb chamfer depth 0.25 ft
Bulb chamfer width 0.791666667 ft
Flange width 5 ft
Flange depth 0.5 ft
Flange chamfer 1.791666667 ft
Flange chamfer depth 0.25 ft
Moment of Intertia table: I = b_i x h_i ^3 / 12 + A_i x d_i ^ 2
Element Name b_i h_i A_i d_i I_i
1 stem 0.5 4.416667 2.208333 2.208333 3.58982
2 flange 5 0.5 2.5 0.25 0.052083
3 flange chamfer 1.791667 0.25 0.223958 0.583333 0.002333
4 flange chamfer 1.791667 0.25 0.223958 0.583333 0.002333
5 bulb 1.583333 0.5 0.791667 4.166667 0.016493
6 bulb chamfer 0.791667 0.25 0.098958 3.833333 0.001031
7 bulb chamfer 0.791667 0.25 0.098958 3.833333 0.001031
A_total 6.145833 ft2
A_i x d_i 9.820313 ft3
NA Sum (A_i x d_i )/ Sum A_i
Moment of Inertia
Section Modulus S = I / c
c_t 1.597881 ft
c_b 2.818785 ft
t
NA
b
A d^2 I
10.76946 14.35928
0.15625 0.208333
0.076208 0.078541
0.076208 0.078541
13.74421 13.76071
1.454138 1.455169
1.454138 1.455169
885 in2
1.597881 ft 19.17458 in
I_total 31 ft4 651022 in4
S_t 20 ft3 33952 in4
S_b 11 ft3 19247 in4