Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
3
4
Serial Particulars Pages
no. no.
1. Acknowledgement 5
2. Preface 8-9
3. Cross Sectional Analysis 11-29
4. Time Series Analysis 31-41
5. Graphical Representation 43-44
6. Common Size Statement 46-48
7. Internal and Sustainable 49
Growth Rate
8. Performa Income 51-52
Statement and Balance
Sheet
9. Plug Variable 53
10. Conclusion 54
11. Recommendations 55-56
5
First of all I would like to thanks to the mighty
ALLAH that he courage me to complete this
project. Secondly I would like to thanks to my dear
teacher Mr. Asif Nagi that he has assigned me to
write this report. I have putted my best to complete
this report. It is honor for me to write a final report
of Kohinoor Sugar Mills Ltd.
6
7
About Student;
Project Report on a
Financial Statement
Analysis of a Company
8
It is a set of four related accounting reports which shows the position and
results of operations of an entity during a particular period of time.
It includes;
• Income statement
• Balance sheet
• Statement of cash flows
• Statement of retained earning
Types of Analysis;
9
About a company;
The company which is being selected for this report is
Kohinoor Sugar Mills Ltd.
FAROOQ AHMED is a company secretary. Its registered office is in
29 – G, GULBERG – II, LAHORE and mills are in JAUHARABAD,
DISTRICT KHUSHAB.
VISION STATEMENT
MISSION STATEMENT
10
Current Ratio:
11
Current Ratio = Current Assets
Current liabilities
= 390,666,841
457,793,528
Current Ratio = 0.85
Interpretation:
Current ratio measures a firm’s ability to meet its short term obligations.
Company’s Result:
In this company current ratio is 0.85. It means current assets are 0.85 times
more than that of its current liabilities.
Quick Ratio:
12
Current Liabilities
= 390,666,841 – 218,956,788 – 369,790
457,793,528
Quick Ratio = 0.374
Interpretation:
Quick Ratio measures the firm ability to meet its short term obligations.
Company’s Result:
In this company quick ratio is 0.374. It means quick assets are 0.374 times
more than that of its current liabilities.
Cash Ratio:
13
457,793,528
Cash Ratio = 0.021
Interpretation:
Cash Ratio measures the firm ability to meet its short term obligations.
Company’s Result:
In this company cash ratio is 0.021. It means quick assets are 0.021 times
more than that of its current liabilities.
Working Capital:
14
Interpretation:
Working Capital measures the firm ability to meet its short term obligations.
Company’s Result:
Debt Ratio:
15
Interpretation:
Debt Ratio measures the firm ability to meet its long term obligations. The
ratio shows the relationship between total liabilities and total assets.
Company’s Result:
Interpretation:
16
Debt to Equity Ratio measures the firm ability to meet its long term
obligations. The ratio shows the relationship between total liabilities and
total shareholder’s equity.
Company’s Result:
In this company debt to equity ratio is 2.49. It means that total liabilities are
2.49 times of total shareholder’s equity.
Interpretation:
17
Time interest indicates that how many times a company can pay its interest
expense from its operating profit.
Company’s Result:
In this company time interest earned is 2.195 times. It means that company
can pay its interest expenses 2.195 times from its operating profit.
Interpretation:
18
Account Receivable Turnover indicates that how many times a company
converts its receivable into cash during a year.
Company’s Result:
Interpretation:
19
Average Collection Period indicates that in how many days a company
converts its receivable into cash.
Company’s Result:
In this company average collection period is 7.5 days. It means that the
company converts its receivable into cash after every 7.5 days.
Inventory Turnover:
Interpretation:
20
Inventory turnover indicates that how many times a company converts its
inventory into sales or cash.
Company’s Result:
Interpretation:
It indicates that how many times revenue is generated from fixed assets of its
own worth.
21
Company’s Result:
In this company fixed asset turnover is 0.701 times. It means that fixed
assets of a company generate revenue 0.701 times of its own worth.
Interpretation:
It indicates that how many times revenue is generated from total assets of its
own worth.
22
Company’s Result:
In this company total asset turnover is 0.737 times. It means that total assets
of a company generate revenue 0.737 times of its own worth.
Interpretation:
Gross Profit Margin shows the relationship between gross profit and net
sales. It is a percentage of gross profit based on net sales.
Company’s Result:
23
In this company gross profit margin is 15.1%. It means a company generates
15.1% gross profit based on its net sales.
Interpretation:
Operating Profit Margin shows the relationship between operating profit and
net sales. It is a percentage of operating profit based on net sales.
Company’s Result:
24
Company vs. Industry:
Interpretation:
Net Profit Margin shows the relationship between net profit and net sales. It
is a percentage of net profit based on net sales.
Company’s Result:
25
If we compare the result of this company with the result of industry,
company is showing “negative result” because company net profit margin
is ‘less than’ that of industry.
Return on Assets:
Interpretation:
Return on Assets shows the relationship between net profit and total assets.
It is a percentage of net profit based on total assets.
Company’s Result:
26
If we compare the result of this company with the result of industry,
company is showing “negative result” because company return on asset is
much ‘less than’ that of industry.
Return on Equity:
Interpretation:
Return on Equity shows the relationship between net profit and total
shareholder’s equity. It is a percentage of net profit based on total
shareholder’s equity.
Company’s Result:
27
If we compare the result of this company with the result of industry,
company is showing “negative result” because company return on equity
is much ‘less than’ that of industry.
Explanation:
Company’s Result:
The Earning per Share of this company is 0.86, which means it is earning
0.86 by a single share.
28
Dividend per Share:
Explanation:
Dividend per Share shows the dividend paid against every share.
Company’s Result:
Dividend per Share of this company is 1.48, which means a company paid
1.48 against every share.
29
30
Ratios 2006 2005 2004
Short Term Solvency Ratios
Current Ratio 0.853 1.082 0.777
Quick Ratio 0.236 0.550 0.341
Cash Ratio 0.021 0.014 0.004
Working Capital (67,126,687) 17,219,191 (65,722,452)
Long Term Solvency Ratios/Stability Ratios
Debt Ratio 0.714 0.502 0.637
Debt to Equity Ratio 2.494 1.011 1.759
Time Interest Earned 2.195 1.043 1.743
Assets Utilization Ratios
Account Receivable
48.71 times 58.13 times 174.8 times
Turnover
Average Collection
7.5 days 6.27 days 2.1 days
Period
Inventory Turnover 3.54 days 10.8 days 7.49 days
Fixed Assets Turnover 0.701 times 1.233 times 1.219 times
Total Assets Turnover 0.737 times 1.202 times 1.341 times
Profitability Ratios
Gross Profit Margin 15.1% 15.8% 12.1%
Operating Profit Margin 9.4% 10.8% 7.3%
Net Profit Margin 0.89% 6.3% 3.5%
Return on Assets 0.6% 7.6% 4.7%
Return on Equity 1.4% 15.3% 13.0%
31
Explanation and
Comparison of Ratios of
2004, 2005 and 2006
32
Current Ratio:
Explanation:
Current ratio measures a firm’s ability to meet its short term obligations.
Comparison:
In 2004 company current ratio is 0.777, in 2005 it become 1.082 and in 2006
it is 0.853, as the current ratio is increasing in 2005 but it is decreasing in
2006 therefore it is not good for a company.
Quick Ratio:
Explanation:
Quick Ratio measures the firm ability to meet its short term obligations.
Comparison:
In 2004 company quick ratio is 0.341, in 2005 it become 0.550 and in 2006
it is 0.236, as the quick ratio is increasing in 2005 but it is decreasing in
2006 therefore it is not good for a company.
33
Cash Ratio:
Explanation:
Cash Ratio measures the firm ability to meet its short term obligations.
Comparison:
In 2004 company cash ratio is 0.004, in 2005 it become 0.014 and in 2006 it
is 0.021, as the cash ratio is increasing in 2005 and also in 2006 therefore it
is good for a company.
Working Capital:
Explanation:
Working Capital measures the firm ability to meet its short term obligations.
Comparison:
Debt Ratio:
34
Explanation:
Debt Ratio measures the firm ability to meet its long term obligations. The
ratio shows the relationship between total liabilities and total assets.
Comparison:
In 2004 company debt ratio is 0.637, in 2005 it become 0.502 and in 2006 it
is 0.714, as the debt ratio is decreasing in 2005 but it is increasing in 2006
therefore it is not good for a company.
Debt to Equity Ratio measures the firm ability to meet its long term
obligations. The ratio shows the relationship between total liabilities and
total shareholder’s equity.
Comparison:
In 2004 company debt to equity ratio is 1.759, in 2005 it become 1.011 and
in 2006 it is 2.494, as the debt to equity ratio is decreasing in 2005 but it is
increasing in 2006 therefore it is not good for a company.
35
Time interest indicates that how many times a company can pay its interest
expense from its operating profit.
Comparison:
In 2004 company time interest earned is 1.743, in 2005 it become 1.043 and
in 2006 it is 2.195, as the time interest earned is decreasing in 2005 but it is
increasing in 2006 and it is good for a company.
Comparison:
36
Comparison:
Inventory Turnover:
Explanation:
Inventory turnover indicates that how many times a company converts its
inventory into sales or cash.
Comparison:
It indicates that how many times revenue is generated from fixed assets of its
own worth.
Comparison:
37
In 2004 company fixed assets turnover is 1.219 times, in 2005 it become
1.233 times and in 2006 it is 0.701 times, as the fixed assets turnover is
increasing in 2005 but it is decreasing in 2006 therefore it is not good for a
company.
It indicates that how many times revenue is generated from total assets of its
own worth.
Comparison:
Gross Profit Margin shows the relationship between gross profit and net
sales. It is a percentage of gross profit based on net sales.
Comparison:
38
In 2004 company gross profit margin is 12.1%, in 2005 it become 15.8%
and in 2006 it is 15.1%, as the gross profit margin is increasing in 2005 but
it is decreasing in 2006 therefore it is not good for a company.
Operating Profit Margin shows the relationship between operating profit and
net sales. It is a percentage of operating profit based on net sales.
Comparison:
Net Profit Margin shows the relationship between net profit and net sales. It
is a percentage of net profit based on net sales.
Comparison:
39
In 2004 company net profit margin is 3.5%, in 2005 it become 6.3% and in
2006 it is 0.89%, as the net profit margin is increasing in 2005 but it is
decreasing in 2006 therefore it is not good for a company.
Return on Assets:
Explanation:
Return on Assets shows the relationship between net profit and total assets.
It is a percentage of net profit based on total assets.
Comparison:
Return on equity:
Explanation:
40
Return on Equity shows the relationship between net profit and total
shareholder’s equity. It is a percentage of net profit based on total
shareholder’s equity.
Comparison:
41
Cross Sectional
Graphical
Representation2004
2005
2006
42
By seeing overall results of 2004, 2005 and 2006,
in cross sectional analysis, company performance
is better in 2005 then 2004 and 2006.
40
30
Representation
20
10
0
2004 2005 2006
43
By seeing overall results of 2004, 2005 and 2006,
in time series analysis, company performance is
better in 2005 then 2004 and 2006.
44
Kohinoor Sugar Mills Ltd.
Common Size Income Statement
For the year ended September 30, 2006
45
51,123,961 5.6% 42,369,222 4.9%
OPERATING PROFIT 86,517,309 9.5% 92,832,293 10.9%
FINANCE COST 51,801,936 5.7% 20,816,861 2.4%
OTHER INCOME/(EXPENSES) 4,698,820 0.51% 17,001,821 1.2%
39,414,193 4.3% 89,017,253 10.4%
WORKER’S PROFIT 1,735,769 0.2% 4,238,917 0.5%
PARTICIPATION FUND
WORKER’S WELFARE FUND 738,793 0.1% -
PROFIT BEFORE TAXATION 36,936,631 4.0% 84,778,336 9.9%
PROVISION FOR TAXATION
Current 4,580,109 0.5% 13,612,568 1.6%
Deferred 24,217,911 2.6% 17,084,060 2.0%
28,798,020 3.2% 30,696,628 3.6%
PROFIT AFTER TAXATION 8,141,611 0.9% 54,081,708 6.3%
46
Prepayments
Other Receivables 14,581,064 1.2% 14,662,764 2.1%
Taxation 24,671,894 1.2% 22,031,178 3.1%
Cash and Bank Balance 9,553,415 0.8% 2,909,458 0.4%
390,666,841 31.5% 227,173,249 32.0%
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Trade and Other Payables 71,639,821 5.7% 46,598,878 6.6%
Accrued Mark-Up 23,025,566 1.9% 5,412,193 0.8%
Short term borrowings-Secured 294,697,100 23.8% 112,112,231 15.8%
Current portion of long term 63,850,932 5.2% 41,555,667 5.8%
liabilities
Provision for Taxation 4,580,109 0.4% 4,275,089 0.6%
457,793,528 36.9% 209,954,058 29.6%
CURRENT ASSETS LESS (67,126,687) (5.4%) 17,219,191 2.4%
CURRENT LIABILITIES
TOTAL ASSETS LESS 1,238,530,181 100% 709,345,093 100%
CURRENT LIABILITIES
CONTINGENCIES AND - - - -
COMMITMENTS
NON CURRENT
LIABILITIES
47
67,924,900 8.8% 74,013,459 13.6%
TOTAL CAPITAL AND 203,902,080 26.5% 209,990,639 38.6%
RESERVES
Internal and
Sustainable Growth
Rate
First we have to find Payout Rate and Retention Ratio;
Payout Rate:
Payout ratio = Dividend paid x 100
Retention Ratio:
Retention ratio (b) = 1 - Payout ratio
48
= 1 – 0.38
Retention ratio (b) = 0.62
Retention ratio indicates percentage change of net profit after tax retained by
company. The retention ratio of company is 96%.
49
Performa Income
Statement and
Balance Sheet
PARTICULARS AMOUNT
50
(51,123,961x0.89) 45,500,325
OPERATING PROFIT (86,517,309x0.89) 77,000,405
Finance Cost (51,801,936x0.89) 46,103,723
Other Income/(Expenses) (4,698,820x0.89) 4,181,950
(39,414,193x0.89) 35,078,632
Workers’ Profit Participation Fund (1,735,769x0.89) 1,544,834
Workers’ Welfare Fund (738,793x0.89) 657,526
PROFIT BEFORE TAXATATION (36,939,631x0.89) 32,876,272
Provision for Taxation
Current (4,580,109x0.89) 4,076,297
Deferred (24,217,911x0.89) 21,553,941
(28,798,020x089) 25,630,237
PROFIT AFTER TAXATATION (8,141,611x0.89) 7,246,034
51
1,159,813,97 REVENUE RESERVE
3
General Reserve 55,180,000
In appropriated Profit 5,273,161
TOTAL CAPITAL and 60,453,161
RESERVE
52
The company performance is good in 2005 but it is not as
better in 2004 and in 2006. Comparing the data of industry
with a company, company ratios are mostly in negative
which is showing that company is not in good reputation.
But company account receivable turnover is greater than
that of company and also the average collection period of
company is good than of industry.
53
54
By seeing overall performance of a company is in good
position in 2005, company should maintain its Current
Ratio so that it can become able to meet its short term
obligations, company should pay its liabilities in proper
way so it can maintain its Debt Ratio. Company should
decrease the average inventory so that it can maintain its
Inventory Turnover; company should increase its net sales
55
by taking good steps so that it can make more Revenue
from its total assets.
Considering these things the company can be able to
maintain a good level.
56