Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1.:
2.;
3.
4.
:
1.
;
2
23
1998 . 1 .
40 23~50
(Durkheim 1984)
( T. Parsons)
( Parsons ,
1951 , 1959)
(M. Weber)
(
s ubstantial
(iron cage)
(Weber 1958) (technocracy)
(76
(hegemony)
24
(H
Marcuse) (one-dimensional
society)
]j1!(technological community)
(78
Marcuse ,
1964 )
??
??
??
???
( The
of
Ecation)
New Sociology
25
40
!
0 (Karl Marx)
(repro ction)
J (Marx , 1969)
( dominant
class)
C o
(:::)
1 (economic-reproductive model)
2. (cultural-reproductivemodel)
3.
26
(Structural Marxism)
H. Ointis)
(state apparatuses)
(materl
existence) (subject)
(
Althusser ,
1972:262-272 )
f J
'
(repressive apparatus)
(
repressive
()
27
1998 . 1 .
40
:
J
J (Althusser 1972:242-243)
;' f J
( Althuss 1972:245-246)
l J
(know-how)
>
2 :
J
J '()
(educational selection)
28
;
;
(Althusser 1972:258-261)
(correspondence
principle)
J (Correspondence Theory)
()
(technical meritocracy)
iijtJ
(
Gintis ,
1973 )
29
1998 . I .
40
(extrinsic rewards)
)
()
()
()
'
30
(II)
ality) J
(economic ration
(sorting mechanism) :
J 0
{~
o
.
31
1998 . 1 .
40
(Lynch 1988)
(Bills
'
autonomy)
1979)
32
(cultural
arbitrary)
arbitrary)
(cultural
: f
;(:::)()
;8
(symbolic violence)
()
( spositions) ()
()
()()
(economic
capital)
cultural capital)
(linguistic capital)
33
1998 . I .
(dominant
40
cnlte)
(academic hierarchies)
(social hierarchies)
()
llP
o ()
()
(habitus)
llfJ
34
(pedagogic ethos)
r ;
advantages)
(academic
J!t-
-
(
S hamai ,
1990 )
2
35
1998 . 1 .
40
(Giroux 1983:271-274)
3 J
()
o l
(Na
1990 )
J
f J (
N.
36
129 )
(Poulantzas
()
()
(power
(Sharp
bloc)
1980:104) 0
(Poulantzas , 1974)
()()
()
37
1998 . 1 .
40
()
(Foucault , 1977)
(techniques of hi-
J
J
()
( micro-powers)
(Foucault , 1979:93)
(Foucault 1980:131) 0 J
(Foucault ,
38
1977 )
r J J
(power-know-
ledge)
()
r J !lD
f
r
(Apple 1982b:3)
Mouffe ,
1979:187 )
J
( Pellica
1981:32)
1981:
(Femia ,
39
1998 . 1 .
40
: (political
society)
;
(civil
society)
+ J
J
0 ?
(Femia , 1981:28)
(Gramsci , 1971:350)
()
()
()
()
(Bourdi
40
(Gramsci 1971 2)
(Apple 1982a)
J
itical)
J
(intellectual-pol
(ethical-pedagogical)
(
counter-hege-
mony)
55) 0
(Donald
1979)
(Fine ,
J
1979)
f J
f J
41
1998' I .
40
?
?
(Apple
1982
b)
()?
?
(=l
??
.L.f-", ()
H f
()
42
2.
3 ;
f J
(imprint)
Ii
(antagon-
(contested reproduction)
(P. Willis)
(Will 1977)
(asymmetrical multidimensional)
43
1998 . 1 . 40
(semi-autonomous realms)
J o
(Moore 1978)
(K abel
& Halsey ,
1977; LaBreq
1978 )
( 78 ):
( 80 ) J 21
~73
( 76 ) 155-161
( 77)
Education , 162:67-92.
Apple , M.
44
W (1979).
Rotitle e
(E)
on Class , Ideology and the State. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
Bills , D. B. (1 983). Social reproduction and the Bowles-Gintis thesis of a correspon
dence between school and work settings. In A. C. Kerckhoff (Ed.) , Research in
Sociology o[ Education and Socialization , VolA. London: JAI Press Inc. pp.185
210
Gramsci Marxism.
Boggs , C. (1976).
mation,
16:645-66
ory and Research [or the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press
Bourdieu , P. , and Passeron , J. C. (1 977).
lU re.
Rproduction
in
Educatiol
London: Sage
(1 9 2).
Levin , H. (1984).
Ashend
der ynamics
D. J. , Kessler , S. &
Dowse
pp.9101.
45
1998 . 1 . 40
Corrigan , P _ (Ed.) (1 980). Capitalism , State Formation , and Marxist Theory. London
Quartet Books.
Dale , R. (1 982). Education and the capitalist state: contributions and contradictions
In M. W. Apple (Ed;) , Cultural and Economic Reproduction in Education. Loodon: Routledge & Kegan Paul
Dale , R. , Easland , G. & Macdonald , M. (Eds.) (1980). Edncation and the State , I and
I I. Sussex , Eng.: FaImer Press
Dav M. (1 980).
Kegan Paul
Donald , J. (1 979). Green paper: Noise of a Crisis. Screen Education , 30:13-49
Durkheim , E. (1 984). The Division of Labour in Society_ London: Macmillan
Everhart , R. (1979). The InBetween Years: Student Life in a Junior High School
Santa Barbara: Graduate School of Education , University of California
Femia , J. V. (1 98 1). Gramsl: Political Thought: Hegemony, Consciousness, and the
Giddens , A. (1 979).
Teacher Decision Making in the Classroom. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
pp.193-302
Gramsci , A. (1 971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. (Edited and translated by
46
Johnson , R. (1979). Three problems. In J. Clarke , C , Critcher & R. Johnson (Ed ,.),
Working-Class Culture: Studies in History and Theory. London: Hutchinson
p.230
Karabel , J. & Halsey , A. H. (1 977). Education research: A review and
In J. Karabel & A. H. Halsey
inrpretation
CapitaMoscow:
Miliband , R. (1 969).
The 'tate
repro uction.
British
Poulantzas , N. A.
Lt
(1 975
Classes
Poulantzas , N. A. (1 975b). Political Power and Social Classes. London: New Left
Books
Poulantzas , N. A. (1978).
Sta
Ravitch , D. (1 978). The Revisionists Revised: A Critique of the Radical Attack on the
Education 'tate
47
1998 . 1 .
40
48
Z@
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to analyze and criticize the main
points on social
an cultural
corresponence
These main
theory , cultural
reproductio
1.The cultural hegemony of the dominant class controls the curriculum and teaching in schools;
2.Educational system loses its autonomy respectively and hence
becomes an instrument used for dominating the whole society;
3.Educational system does not fulfill the ideal of equal opportunity of educalion , the reasons are related to what is mentioned
next;
4.Educational system reproduce unfair social classes
However , the author also points out some weaknesses of repro
duction theories. They are as follows:
mo ern e cation
mobility;
49
41
1998' 1 .
40
Keywords
social reproduction , cultural reproduction , cultural hegemony , social
class , cultural capital , correspondence theory , Sociology of Knowledge , NeoMarxism , Critical theory , Structuralism
50
()
()()
2
3
51