Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
t
f
0
J(t) dt
V
FB
(2)
where A
m
is the membrane area (m
2
) and J is the permeation
ux (Lh
1
m
2
).
Table 1
Simulation of CIP systemcoupled with membrane regeneration in continuous mode: characteristics of chosen combinations permeation ux (J)reduction of chemical
oxygen demand (Red
CODs
)
Combination JRedCODs Operation J (Lh
1
m
2
) Red
CODs
A
m
a
(m
2
) Reference
Constant
[J
h
RedCODs =0]
c
MF
b
266.8 0 0.226 [21]
[J
i
RedCODs
i
]
c
UF
b
166.8 0.217 0.361 [21]
[J
l
RedCODs
h
]
c
NF
b
56.8 0.317 1.061 [21]
Variable
[J
h
RedCODs =0]
v
MF
b
0.4t +300
c
0 0.226 [4]
[J
i
RedCODs
i
]
v
UF
b
0.4t +200
c
0.001t +0.3
c
0.361 [4]
[J
l
RedCODs
h
(1)]
v
d
NF
b
0.4t +90
c
0.001t +0.4
c
1.061 [5,22]
[J
l
RedCODs
h
(2)]
v
d
NF
b
0.4t +90
c
0.00341t +0.6
c
1.061 [5,22]
[J
l
RedCODs
h
(3)]
v
d
NF
b
6 ln(t +0.05)0.22317 t +100
c
0.001t +0.4
c
1.061 [5,22]
Indices: c, constant vs. time; h, high; i, intermediate; l, low; v, variable vs. time.
a
A
m
, membrane area required to reach VRR=80 in a ltration time, t
f
=166 h.
b
Membranes used: MF, multichannel tubular inorganic membrane (Kerasep, Orelis, Miribel, France) 19 channels, 0.1 m mean pore diameter. UF, multichannel
tubular inorganic membrane (Kerasep, Orelis, Miribel, France) 19 channels, 300 kg mol
1
cut-off. NF, prototype solgel (Kerasep, Orelis, Miribel, France) 19
channels, lactose (1g L
1
) retention =0.35.
c
time, t in h.
d
Three different cases ((1), (2) and (3)) of J
l
RedCODs
h
evolutions in nanoltration, NF runs were considered according to previous experimental work [5,22].
332 G. G esan-Guiziou et al. / Separation and Purication Technology 54 (2007) 329339
For a continuous ltration operation:
VRR =
A
m
t
f
0
J(t) dt
V
FB
(3)
Eqs. (2) and (3) permit to calculate the membrane area, A
m
required to reach a target VRR (=80 arbitrary) according to the
J level at the end of the ltration (t =t
f
) (Table 1).
Regardless of the operation (ltration or centrifugation), the
nal VRR is considered as equal. This hypothesis is realistic
according to Dresch [4].
2.1.2.2. Reduction of COD
S
and SS; evolution of J. Regardless
of the ltration operation, reduction of suspended solids and
caustic soda are considered total and nil, respectively (Red
SS
=1,
Red
NaOH
=0), in agreement with the experimental results of
Dreschet al. [9]. The reductionof COD
S
(Red
CODs
) is denedas:
Red
CODs
= 1
C
p
C
(4)
where C
p
(g L
1
) is the COD
S
concentration in the permeate
compartment and C (g L
1
) is its concentration in the CIP tank.
For the centrifugation operation, Red
NaOH
=0, Red
SS
=0.3
and Red
CODs
=0 [4].
Three hypotheses are proposed to describe the evolution of
the permeation ux, J and the reduction of COD
S
, Red
CODs
in
the course of the time:
- J and Red
CODs
vary linearly with time according to previously
reported laws obtained in conditions comparable to industrial
operation: MF, UF [4] and NF [5,22] (Table 1);
- J (for values J <120 Lh
1
m
2
) varies according to non-linear
relationship in order to simulate a real ltration operation
[5,22] and Red
CODs
varies linearly (Table 1);
- J and Red
CODs
are constant (noted as [J, Red
CODs
]
c
in Table 1)
[21]; the values of J and Red
CODs
are chosen, for each
JRedCODs couple, as the mean values of variables J and
Red
CODs
during t
f
(Table 1).
The combinations of JRed
CODs
are representative of MF,
UF and NF operations (Table 1).
2.2. Coupling of cleaning and regeneration systems
2.2.1. Modelling the evolution of the characteristics of
cleaning solutions
2.2.1.1. Surface tension, . Surface tension, is calculated
from COD
S
values. The experimental relationships between
(mJ m
2
) and COD
S
(g L
1
) have been established with indus-
trial NaOH solutions sampled from industrial single-use and
re-use CIP systems, at 50
C [8]:
= 74.0 for COD
S
= 0 g L
1
(fresh caustic soda)
= 39.1 6.5 ln[COD
S
] for 0 < COD
S
4 g L
1
= 30.0 for COD
S
> 4 g L
1
(5)
The surface tension of industrial solutions after nanoltra-
tion is low ( 35 mJ m
2
) and generally slightly higher than
surface tension of the initial solutions: +23 mJ m
2
[4]. In the
simulations performed, the slight increase in of the ltrate is
not taken into account: is considered as depending exclusively
on COD
S
concentration in the CIP tank.
2.2.1.2. Suspended solids, SS; soluble chemical oxygen
demand, COD
S
. In the case of periodical draining, the evolu-
tion of the COD
S
concentration in the CIP solution, C (g L
1
)
is calculated according to Dresch et al. [21]:
C(t) =
Input
CODs
V
CIP
t (6)
where t is the operating time of the CIP system since the last
draining (h).
After drainingandrenewal, C(t) is decreaseddownto0 g L
1
.
In the case of regeneration in a discontinuous mode (ltration
or centrifugation), the solution is regenerated during a cycle,
t
c
(equal to the durations of the ltration, t
f
and of membrane
cleaning, t
Cl
) and the regenerated solution is readjusted to V
CIP
with fresh NaOH at the end of the regeneration. According to
Dresch et al. [21], the maximum concentration of COD
S
in the
regeneration tank, at the end of the n
c
cycle, C
max
(n
c
) is given
by:
- whenever Red
CODs
=1:
C
max
(n
c
) =
Input
CODs
t
c
V
CIP
n1
i=0
(1 Red
CODs
)
i
1
1
VRR
(7)
- whenever Red
CODs
=1
C
max
(n
c
) =
Input t
c
V
CIP
(8)
In the case of a continuous mode ltration, the mass balance
in the CIP tank during the regeneration leads to [21]:
dC(t)
dt
+
J(t) Red
CODs
(t) A
m
V
CIP
C(t) =
Input
CODs
V
CIP
(9)
When J and Red
CODs
are not constant, in opposition to ideal
systems previously described [21,23], the concentration in the
CIP tank is calculated (from Eq. (9)) by numerical integration:
the C
i+1
concentration at time t
i+1
is calculated from the C
i
concentration at time t
i
:
C
i+1
= C
i
1
(J
i+1
+J
i
)(Red
CODs
i+1
+Red
CODs
i
)A
m
4 V
CIP
(t
i+1
t
i
)
+
Input
CODs
V
CIP
(t
i+1
t
i
) (10)
At t =0, the concentration of COD
S
in the CIP tank is equal to 0.
At the beginning of each cycle, after the membrane cleaning, the
calculated concentration in the CIP tank takes into account both
the addition of fresh NaOH required to compensate for the lost
G. G esan-Guiziou et al. / Separation and Purication Technology 54 (2007) 329339 333
retentate volume and the pollution brought by the CIP system
during the interruption of regeneration system for membrane
cleaning. The initial concentration, C
0
for the next regeneration
cycle is consequently given by:
C
0
=
V
CIP
C
t
+Input
CODs
t
Cl
V
CIP
+V
FB
(11)
where C
t
is the concentration in the CIP tank before the mem-
brane cleaning (g L
1
).
From Eqs. (10) and (11), the evolution of SS, COD
S
and
then in the CIP tank can be calculated in the course of time.
The accuracy of C due to the calculation method of Eq. (10) is
2%.
2.2.2. Cost modelling
2.2.2.1. Investment costs. The investment cost of a centrifuge
(5006000 Lh
1
; 22 kW) is estimated at D 90,000.
The investment cost of a ltration pilot including pumps,
sensors, tanks, pipes, regulations and membrane modules is
D 61,000. The ltration modules are composed of 7 mem-
brane tubes (19 channels 3.5 mm1.2 m) in series or parallel.
A 10 m
3
thermally isolated stainless steel tank is estimated at
D 30,000.
2.2.2.2. Operating costs. The operating costs of the centrifuge
are divided into three stations:
- Energy(D 0.05 kWh
1
): for runningthe centrifuge andheating
the solutions from 20 to 70
C according to:
E = mC
water
T (12)
where m is the mass of solutions to be heated (kg), C
water
the specic heat of water (=4.18 kJ kg
1
K
1
) and T is the
difference in temperature (K) (50 K).
- Readjustment of the cleaning solution with fresh NaOH
solution, considering the cost of NaOH at D 0.4 kg
1
and
the price of water (purchase and treatment) at D 1.52 m
3
.
The volume of readjustment is estimated at 1 V
FB
NaOH
(20 g L
1
).
- Labour: 10 min/cycle of duration t
c
(at D 22 h
1
) for monitor-
ing the centrifuge.
The operating costs of the ltration operations are divided
into four stations:
- Inorganic membrane replacement (D 3000 m
2
), with an esti-
mated lifetime of 6 years;
- Cleaning of membranes: the volume of required water is
assumed to be equal to 4 V
FB
: 2 V
FB
of water for rinses, 1
V
FB
for complex detergent (10 g L
1
) for membrane cleaning
and 1 V
FB
of NaOH (20 g L
1
) for readjusting the CIP solu-
tion volume (NaOH, D 0.4 kg
1
; water, D 1.52 m
3
; complex
detergent, D 2.7 kg
1
);
- Labour (D 22 h
1
): 10 min/cycle of duration t
c
for monitoring
an automated ltration plant;
- Energy for pumping and heating (D 0.05 kWh
1
).
The energyrequiredfor heatingthe solutions from20to70
C
is calculated following Eq. (12). Loss of heat during ltration is
negligible.
According to running hypotheses, in fed-batch mode, the out-
put pressure of the pump should be at least equal to the sum of
the chosen mean transmembrane pressure, TP and of half the
pressure drop of the plant. The pump works with a uid having
a relative pressure equal to zero, since the retentate is recycled
into a tank at atmospheric pressure [4]. The energy required
for the circulating the uids in the ltration loop is therefore
calculated according to:
P =
Q
TP +
P
2
(13)
where is the pump yield and Qis the volumetric owrate in the
ltration module. Q is calculated from crosssections and cho-
sen crossow velocity of each ltration system (MF, 7.0 ms
1
;
UF, 7.0 ms
1
; NF, 2.7 ms
1
). TP is the transmembrane pres-
sure (Pa). The values used for the simulation were extracted
fromexperiments performed by Dresch [4]: 0.5 10
5
Pa for MF,
1.2 10
5
Pa for UF and 4.0 10
5
Pa for NF. P is the pressure
drop in the plant (Pa), calculated by adding 20%excess pressure
drop to the pressure drop of a smooth membrane evaluated by
Blasius (P
Blasius
). The 20% extra pressure takes into account
the membrane rugosity and pressure drop at the entrance and at
the outlet of the membrane module [4]:
P = 12 P
Blasius
and
P
Blasius
= 0.16 L
m
d
1.25
c
0.75
v
1.75
0.25
(14)
where L
m
is the membrane length (m), the retentate volu-
metric mass, 1000 kg m
3
, the retentate dynamic viscosity,
0.45 10
3
Pa s and d
c
is the channel hydraulic diameter,
3.5 10
3
m.
2.2.2.3. Savings generated by the regenerationre-use of the
NaOH solution. The reference system is a CIP system with
either a weekly draining of the CIP tank or a draining at a given
chosen concentration, equal to a limiting concentration. Savings
are calculated considering the following:
- consumed water and NaOH solution;
- energy required to heat the total volume of the CIP system to
70
0
.
3
g
L
1
i
n
r
e
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
d
N
a
O
H
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
s
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
M
e
m
b
r
a
n
e
a
r
e
a
,
A
m
(
m
2
)
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
c
o
s
t
s
(
D
)
R
u
n
n
i
n
g
c
o
s
t
s
(
D
y
e
a
r
1
)
S
a
v
i
n
g
s
(
D
y
e
a
r
1
)
(
w
e
e
k
l
y
d
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
)
P
a
y
-
B
a
c
k
t
i
m
e
(
y
e
a
r
)
C
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
,
I
n
v
e
s
t
e
d
a
E
n
e
r
g
y
M
e
m
b
r
a
n
e
C
l
e
a
n
i
n
g
L
a
b
o
r
T
o
t
a
l
E
n
e
r
g
y
N
a
O
H
W
a
t
e
r
T
o
t
a
l
M
F
3
.
2
,
3
.
5
7
1
5
3
0
2
6
0
9
1
7
5
5
3
2
0
4
2
2
8
8
9
8
5
6
1
6
9
0
6
(
1
5
0
9
)
4
6
5
9
2
(
4
1
6
0
)
8
8
5
2
(
7
9
0
)
7
2
3
5
0
(
6
4
5
9
)
1
.
1
(
)
U
F
5
.
1
,
5
.
3
7
6
7
9
0
3
7
5
4
2
6
3
2
3
2
0
4
2
2
8
8
1
1
8
7
8
1
.
3
(
)
N
F
1
4
8
,
1
5
.
8
1
0
8
3
8
0
2
3
6
5
7
8
9
7
3
2
0
4
2
2
8
8
1
5
7
5
4
1
.
9
(
)
C
F
1
5
0
0
0
0
b
1
0
2
8
9
2
2
2
8
c
6
8
6
4
1
9
3
8
1
2
.
8
(
)
R
e
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
d
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
a
r
e
e
i
t
h
e
r
l
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
M
F
,
U
F
,
N
F
i
n
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
o
u
s
m
o
d
e
a
t
c
o
n
s
t
a
n
t
J
a
n
d
R
e
d
C
O
D
s
)
o
r
c
e
n
t
r
i
f
u
g
a
t
i
o
n
(
d
i
s
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
o
u
s
m
o
d
e
)
.
S
a
v
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
t
a
k
i
n
g
i
n
t
o
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
e
i
t
h
e
r
a
d
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
r
e
-
u
s
e
d
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
w
h
e
n
S
S
r
e
a
c
h
0
.
3
g
L
1
o
r
a
w
e
e
k
l
y
d
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
(
v
a
l
u
e
s
g
i
v
e
n
i
n
p
a
r
e
n
t
h
e
s
i
s
)
.
A
m
,
m
e
m
b
r
a
n
e
a
r
e
a
.
a
U
n
i
t
o
f
m
e
m
b
r
a
n
e
a
r
e
a
:
1
.
7
5
5
m
2
.
b
o
n
e
c
e
n
t
r
i
f
u
g
e
(
D
9
0
,
0
0
0
)
+
t
w
o
t
a
n
k
s
(
2
D
3
0
,
0
0
0
)
.
c
D
o
e
s
n
o
t
t
a
k
e
i
n
t
o
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
t
h
e
r
e
a
d
j
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
i
n
f
r
e
s
h
N
a
O
H
.
338 G. G esan-Guiziou et al. / Separation and Purication Technology 54 (2007) 329339
paper, are quite similar even if energy for maintaining the tem-
perature of the two tanks in discontinuous mode has to be added.
Despite of this short pay-back time, the cost of weekly dis-
posal of the re-used cleaning solutions still remains lower than
the savings realized by integrating a ltration operation. The
functionality of that highly contaminated solution is probably
very different owing to its high SS concentration: 3.4 g L
1
according to the input
SS
value.
Moreover, the economical evaluation does not take into
account the decrease in the duration of the alkaline cleaning
phase, which could be achieved due to a faster cleaning kinetics
related to the lower surface tension of the CIP solutions [6,8].
Such an outcome shown for UF membrane cleaning should be
quantied on an industrial scale for CIP cleaning of stainless
steel plants treating or transforming milk, whey or dairy uids.
The MF operation is the recommended operation, the less
expensive one, which retains fewsurfactants compounds, ensur-
ing a lowsurface tension caustic solution. If the high COD
S
level
alter cleaning efciency and kinetics, then UF would be more
appropriate for regenerating the solution but at a higher cost.
4. Conclusions
Numerical simulation of cleaning-in-place systemcoupled to
a regeneration operation (crossow ltration or centrifugation)
shows that it is possible to control the cleaning solution from
a qualitative and quantitative point of view. Suspended solids,
SS, surface tension, and soluble chemical oxygen demand,
COD
s
, are maintained at xed levels. Their evolution versus time
depends on the CIP system parameters (CIP volume, input of
COD
S
and SSinto the systemtank) and on the regeneration oper-
ation performances: combination of ltration uxreduction of
COD
s
(JRed
CODs
) of each ltration operation (MF, UF, NF),
membrane area, A
m
, and cycle duration, t
f
for ltration; Red
CODs
and t
c
for centrifugation.
Numerical simulation of such CIP processes is a powerful
tool which permits selecting and sizing the more appropriate
regenerationseparation, MF, UF, NFor centrifugation, regarding
the targeted CIP cleaning solution composition: SS, COD
S
,
and process costs.
The ltration processes are more performing and less expen-
sive compared to centrifugation. The equations which govern
the operation of a continuous ltration operation, established
from hypotheses coming from a real ltration system operation
(ltration ux, J and COD
S
reduction, Red
CODs
not constant
versus time; interrupting the ltration system while membrane
cleaning) highlight an alteration of the process performance as
compared to an ideal system with constant J and Red
CODs
.
The discontinuous mode is to be preferred regarding the caustic
solution composition and functionality, but the continuous mode
is simpler to use at a lower capital cost.
Among the different membrane operations, MF is the most
appropriate operation since it retains less surfactants compounds
(lower CIP caustic surface tension) and is less expensive. How-
ever, MF results in higher COD
S
concentration in the caustic
solution compared to UF and NF. If such a higher level is prob-
lematic for cleaning, then UF is to be selected. Experimental
quantication of the role of NaOHsolution characteristics in the
efciency and kinetics of cleaning of industrial stainless steel or
membrane equipments used for the treatment and the transfor-
mation of milk or dairy uids is compulsory so as to quantify
and control the level of the critical values for SS, COD
S
and .
Acknowledgements
We thank GES (Noyal/Vilaine, 35, France), Even
(Ploudaniel, 29, France) and Coopagri Bretagne (Landerneau,
22, France) for nancial support, and Uzi Merin for helpful
discussion.
References
[1] M. Henck, Recycling of used caustic cleaning solutions in the dairy industry
by crossow ltration, Bull. Int. Dairy Fed. 9504 (1995) 175183 (Special
issue).
[2] FIL-IDF design and use of CIP systems in the dairy industry, Bulletin No.
17, Int. Dairy Fed., Brussels, Belgium, 1979.
[3] A.J.D. Romney, C.I.P: Cleaning in Place, second ed., The Society of Dairy
Technology, Huntingdon/Cambridgeshire/UK, 1990, p. 224.
[4] M. Dresch, Proc ed es ` a membrane de r eg en eration des solutions de net-
toyage de lindustrie laiti` ere, Ph.D. Thesis, Ecole Nationale Sup erieure
dAgronomie, Rennes, France, p. 189, 1998.
[5] G. G esan-Guiziou, E. Boyaval, G. Daun, Nanoltration for the recovery
of caustic cleaning in place solutions: robustness towards large variations
of composition, J. Dairy Res. 69 (2002) 633643.
[6] U. Merin, G. G esan-Guiziou, E. Boyaval, G. Daun, Cleaning-in-place in
the dairy industry: criteria for reuse of caustic (NaOH) solutions, Lait 82
(2002) 357366.
[7] S. Novalic, A. Dabrowski, K.D. Kulbe, Nanoltration of caustic and acidic
cleaning solutions with high COD. Part 1. Recycling of sodium hydroxide,
J. Food Eng. 38 (November (2)) (1998) 125132.
[8] N. Alvarez, G. G esan-Guiziou, G. Daun, The role of surface tension of
re-used NaOH on the cleaning efciency in dairy plants, Int. Dairy J. 17
(2007) 403411.
[9] M. Dresch, G. Daun, B. Chaufer, Membrane processes for the recovery
of dairy cleaning-in-place solutions, Lait 79 (1999) 245259.
[10] M.-A. Henck, Recycling of caustic cleaning solutions using cross-ow
ltration in the dairy industry, Ph.D. Thesis, Federal Technical University,
Z urich, Switzerland, p. 141, 1993.
[11] A.J. Mawson, Regeneration of cleaning and processing solutions, Trends
Food Sci. Technol. 8 (1) (1997) 713.
[12] M. Mietton-Peuchot, C. Condat-Ouillon, T. Courtois, Regeneration of
soda solutions issued from cleaning-in-place by cross-ow microltration,
Entropie 226 (2000) 4453.
[13] E. R as anen, M. Nystr om, J. Sahlstein, O. Tossavainen, Purication and
regeneration of diluted caustic and acidic washing solutions by membrane
ltration, Desalination 149 (2002) 185190.
[14] G. Tr agardh, D. Johansson, Purication of alcaline cleaning solution from
the dairy industry using membrane separation technology, Desalination 119
(1998) 2129.
[15] C. Jung, The recovery of washing caustic fromCIP waste water, Eur. Dairy
Mag. 5 (1996) 3234.
[16] A. Martin, Recyclage de solutions d etergentes, contenant de lacide phos-
phorique, utilis ees dans les fromageries, in: Proc ed es ` a membranes:
matrise du cycle de leau dans lindustrie, R ealisations et perspectives,
Pollutec, Paris Nord, Octobre 2, 1997.
[17] F. Morel, Fromadec: un proc ed e Hypred, Process 1126 (1997) 6465.
[18] V. Yip, S.D. Arnteld, A.W. Hydamaka, Potential for stainless steel micro-
ltration processing to reduce efuent from a uid milk and ice-cream
processing plant, J. Dairy Sci. 79 (1996) 710716.
[19] C. Potier, R eg en erer au coeur de la production pour economiser les produits
et r eduire les rejets, in: Proceedings leau et les efuents dans lindustrie
G. G esan-Guiziou et al. / Separation and Purication Technology 54 (2007) 329339 339
alimentaire: nouveaux d esnouvelles r eponses, Saint-Brieuc, France,
Centre Francais de lElectricit e, May 28, 1998, pp. 9398.
[20] F. Morel, La compl ementarit e des membranes, Process 1136 (1998) 7576.
[21] M. Dresch, G. Daun, B. Chaufer, Integrated membrane regeneration
process for dairy cleaning-in-place, Sep. Purif. Technol. 2223 (2001)
181191.
[22] A. Le Tanneur, Robustesse de la nanoltration appliqu e ` a la r eg en eration
des solutions alcalines de nettoyage en place, Internal Document (2000).
[23] G. G esan-Guiziou, M. Dresch, D. Jacob, G. Daun, Simulation num erique
dun proc ed e de nettoyage en place, in: R ecents progr` es en G enie de
Proc ed es, vol. 82, 8` eme Congr` es Francophone de G enie de Proc ed es,
Nancy, October 1719, 2001, pp. 219224.