Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
C
T
cell
: cells temperature
S: solar insolation in W/m
2
PV Cell under Varying Temperature
I
S
=I
RS
(T
Cell
/T
r
)
3
exp [qE
G
(1/T
r
-1/T
Cell
)/KN] (4.3)
Where
I
S
: cells saturation current
I
RS:
reverse saturation current
E
G
: band-gap energy
I
RS
=I
SC
/ [exp (qv
OC
/KNN
S
T
C
)-1]
(4.4)
V
OC: PV
open-circuit voltage.
35
4.2
Simulink Model of solar photovoltaic module
The equations (4.1), (4.2), (4.3) and (4.4) have been used to develop a Matlab
simulink model of solar photovoltaic cell/module/array as given in Figure 4.2.
Fig.4.2: Model of solar photovoltaic module
4.2.1 PV MODULE CHARACTERISTICS
IV and PV characteristic curve are obtained by simulation of the developed
model for the parameters given in table 4.1 for ELDORA40 module is given in
Fig.4.3.
Table 4.1: Parameters of ELDORA40 Solar Module at solar radiation 1000W/sqm,
AM 1.5 and 25
C cell temperature
PARAMETER VALUE
Maximum power (Pmax) 37 W
Voltage at Pmax (Vmax) 17.2V
Current at Pmax (Imax) 2.2A
Short circuit current (Isc) 2.4A
Open circuit voltage (Voc) 21V
36
Fig.4.3: Characteristic curves of the module
The results obtained by the simulation of model are same as the parameters given by
manufacturer.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3
Voltage (V)
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
(
A
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
P
o
w
e
r
(
W
)
P vs V
I vs V
1000 W/sqm
700 W/sqm
400 W/sqm
100 W/sqm
100 W/sqm
400 W/sqm
700 W/sqm
1000 W/sqm
37
4.3 MAXIMUM POWER POINT TRACKING
There are many algorithms for tracking of maximum power point of solar cell
as the summary is presented in Table 4.2.
Table 4.2: Main Characteristics of MPPT Tequenique [36]
38
The current and voltage characteristics of solar cell are non- linear. Maximum
power changes with change in solar insolation and cell temperature.
In this study, a relation between open circuit voltage and voltage corresponding
to maximum power has been developed. For developing relationship between Vmpp
and Voc, parameters of the solar PV module ELDORA40 as given in Table 4.1 have
been used.
The model given in Figure 4.2 is simulated for various values of solar insolations (0-
1100 W/m
2
) and cell temperatures and obtained results are shown in Figures 4.4-
4.16. Open circuit voltage (Voc) and corresponding maximum power point voltage is
read from the graphs.
Fig.4.4: I-V, P-V and dp/dv-V characteristics curves at 25 W/m
2
solar insolation
Fig.4.5: I-V, P-V and dp/dv-V characteristics curves at 50 W/m
2
solar insolation
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.1
Voltage (V)
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
(
A
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
11
p
o
w
e
r
(
W
)
I vs V
dp/dv vs V
P vs V
18 deg C
25 deg C
35 deg C
45 deg C
Vmpp
Voc
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
Voltage (V)
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
(
A
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
p
o
w
e
r
(
W
)
I vs V
dp/dv vs V
P vs V
35 deg C
18 deg C
25 deg C
45 deg C
Voc
Vmpp
39
Fig.4.6: I-V, P-V and dp/dv-V characteristics curves at 100 W/m
2
solar insolation
Fig.4.7: I-V, P-V and dp/dv-V characteristics curves at 200 W/m
2
solar insolation
Fig.4.8: I-V, P-V and dp/dv-V characteristics curves at 300 W/m
2
solar insolation
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
Voltage (V)
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
(
A
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
p
o
w
e
r
(
W
)
I vs V
dp/dv vs V
P vs V
18 deg C
35 deg C
Voc
Vmpp
25 deg C
45 deg C
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
11
Voltage (V)
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
(
A
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
p
o
w
e
r
(
W
)
I vs V
dp/dv vs V
P vs V
18 deg C
35 deg C
25 deg C
45 deg C
Vmpp
Voc
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
11
Voltage (V)
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
(
A
)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
p
o
w
e
r
(
W
)
I vs V
dp/dv vs V
P vs V
18 deg C
35 deg C
25 deg C
45 deg C
Vmpp
Voc
40
Fig.4.9: I-V, P-V and dp/dv-V characteristics curves at 400 W/m
2
solar insolation
Fig.4.10: I-V, P-V and dp/dv-V characteristics curves at 500 W/m
2
solar insolation
Fig.4.11: I-V, P-V and dp/dv-V characteristics curves at 600 W/m
2
solar insolation
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
Voltage (V)
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
(
A
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
p
o
w
e
r
(
W
)
I vs V
dp/dv vs V
P vs V
35 deg C
18 deg C
25 deg C
45 deg C
Voc
Vmpp
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
Voltage (V)
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
(
A
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
p
o
w
e
r
(
W
)
I vs V
dp/dv vs V
P vs V
35 deg C
Voc
18 deg C
25 deg C
45 deg C
Vmpp
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
Voltage (V)
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
(
A
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
p
o
w
e
r
(
W
)
I vs V
dp/dv vs V
P vs V
35 deg C
25 deg C
18 deg C
45 deg C
Vmpp
Voc
41
Fig.4.12: I-V, P-V and dp/dv-V characteristics curves at 700 W/m
2
solar insolation
Fig.4.13: I-V, P-V and dp/dv-V characteristics curves at 800 W/m
2
solar insolation
Fig.4.14: I-V, P-V and dp/dv-V characteristics curves at 900 W/m
2
solar insolation
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
Voltage (V)
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
(
A
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
p
o
w
e
r
(
W
)
I vs V
dp/dv vs V
P vs V
35 deg C
18 deg C
Vmpp
25 deg C
45 deg C
Voc
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3
Voltage (V)
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
(
A
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
p
o
w
e
r
(
W
)
I vs V
dp/dv vs V
P vs V
35 deg C
18 deg C
25 deg C
45 deg C
Vmpp
Voc
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3
Voltage (V)
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
(
A
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
p
o
w
e
r
(
W
)
I vs V
dp/dv vs V
P vs V
35 deg C
Vmpp
Voc
18 deg C
25 deg C
45 deg C
42
Fig.4.15: I-V, P-V and dp/dv-V characteristics curves at 1000 W/m
2
solar insolation
Fig.4.16: I-V, P-V and dp/dv-V characteristics curves at 1100 W/m
2
solar insolation
As it is clear from the above characteristic curves that Voc and Vmpp depends
on solar insolations and cell temperatures.
The values of Voc and Vmpp are read from the above curves and plotted to
develop a relation as given in Figure 4.17.
Fig.4.17: Voc vs. Vmpp
The Figure 4.17 shows a linear relation between Voc and Vmpp that can be
represented by a linear equation as given in equation (4.5).
Vmpp=0.817Voc+0.0055 (4.5)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3
Voltage (V)
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
(
A
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
p
o
w
e
r
(
W
)
I vs V
dp/dv vs V
P vs V
35 deg C
Voc
Vmpp
18 deg C
25 deg C
45 deg C
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3
Voltage (V)
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
(
A
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
p
o
w
e
r
(
W
)
I vs V
dp/dv vs V
P vs V
35 deg C
Voc
18 deg C
25 deg C
45 deg C
Vmpp
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Voc (V)
V
m
p
p
(
V
)
43
Can be approximated as,
Vmpp=0.817Voc (4.6)
To implement this by using microcontroller two modules of similar
characteristics are required. Open circuit voltage of one module is multiplied by the
factor 0.817 and given to reference of the ADC. Now the voltage of the module
whose maximum power is being tracked is sensed and feed to one of the channel of
ADC.adc compare the voltages and sends an error signal to microcontroller.
Programming is done such that when the sensed voltage is equal to the reference
voltage a control pulse is generated.
In literature there is a fixed voltage method to track the maximum power. In
this study mp has been tracked by this method also. The Vmpp has been fixed by
using equation (4.6) by multiplying the average value of Voc.
Actual maximum power, maximum power actually tracked and maximum power
obtained by fixed Vmpp method have been shown in Figure 4.18.
Fig.4.18: Actual Pmax and Pmax tracked
Loss of power when these two methods are used is given in Figure 4.19. It can be
seen that power loss is minimum when power is tracked by implementing equation
(4.2).
Fig. 4.19: Power loss in fixed Vmpp and actually tracking of Vmpp
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
A
c
t
u
a
l
m
a
x
i
m
u
m
p
o
w
e
r
(
W
)
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
solar insolation (W/sqm)
M
a
x
i
m
u
m
p
o
w
e
r
t
r
a
c
k
e
d
(
W
)
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
Actual maximum power
Maximum power tracked
maximum power by fixed Vmpp
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
11
P
o
w
e
r
l
o
s
s
(
W
)
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
11
solar insolation (W/sqm)
P
o
w
e
r
l
o
s
s
(
W
)
Actually tracked
Fixed Vmpp
44
CHAPTER-5
EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
5.1 INTRODUCTION
The main objective of this chapter is to explain the components of the
experimental setup. Brief function of each component has been described. The whole
setup is divided into two units. The one unit which is of low power and control the
power flow is called control unit and the other unit is of high power which contains
power electronic devices thyristers is known as power unit.
The experimental setup comprises of the following components:
1. 8051 advanced microcontroller kit
2. Analog to digital converter
3. Zero crossing detectors
5. Driver and buffer circuit
6. Single phase fully controlled converter
7. Solar module
The control unit which generates control pulses of desired delay to control the
flow of power are comprised of the following components:
(i) 8051 advanced microcontroller kit
(ii) Analog to digital converter
(iii) Zero crossing detectors
(iv) Driver and buffer circuit
The detail description of each component with circuit diagrams and photographs
have been discussed. The complete circuit diagram of the proposed work is given in
Figure 5.1.
45
5.2 COMPLETE CIRCUIT DIAGRAM
Fig. 5.1 (a)
46
Fig 5.1: Main circuit diagram
47
5.3 DEVELOPED MODEL
The complete experimental setup of the control of grid connected photovoltaic
system is shown in Fig.5.2 and photograph of the solar module used is given in
Fig.5.3.
Fig.5.2: (a)
Fig.5.2: (b)
Fig.5.2: Developed model of the proposed work
Fig.5.3: Solar module used in experiment
48
5.4 DESCRIPTION OF CONTROL UNIT COMPONENTS
The control unit comprises of the following components:
(i) A microcontroller kit
(ii) A/D converter
(iii) A Zero crossing detector
(iv) Driver and Buffer circuit
5.4.1 8051 Advanced Microprocessor Development Kit
The development kit has the following components:
(i) 8 bit, 12 MHz, 8051 microcontroller,
(ii) Two timers-8253: which are used to provide desired delay.
(iii)Two 8255 parallel I/O interface as photograph is shown in Figure 5.2.
Fig. 5.4: 8051 microcontroller kit
8255 PPI
TIMER
8051
CONTROL
PULSE
ADC
INTERFACE
49
5.4.2 Zero Crossing Detector
The proposed circuit of zero crossing detectors is shown in Fig.5.3. ZCD is
used to sense the zero crossing of supply voltage. It acts as a reference signal for
control pulse.
(a)
(b)
Fig.5.5: Zero crossing detector (a) circuit diagram, (b) photograph
5.4.4 Analog to Digital Converter
ADC is most widely used device for data acquisition. In physical world
everything is analog so we need ADC to convert analog signal into digital for
processing through microcontroller. Circuit diagram of ADC is shown in Figure 5.4.
TRANSFORMER
220/12V
OP-AMP 741
IC-7805
OUTPU
T TO
ADC
50
(a)
(b)
Fig 5.6: Circuit diagram of ADC (a) circuit diagram, (b) photograph
5.4.5 Isolation for Control Pulse
In most of the circuits, there is a potential difference between the gates of the
various thyristers, as well as between the control circuit and thyristers. The setup will
consist of linear ICs (OPAM) and digital IC microcontroller, PPI. Basically these are
low voltage and low power circuits. The power circuits which consist of thyristor is
high power circuit. Therefore it becomes necessary for the output channel of the gate
pulse generating circuit to be isolated from one another as well as from thyristers. The
isolation can be provided either by a small high frequency transformer or by an opt-
coupler ICs. Similarly control electronics which control the conduction period of each
OUTPUT FROM
ZCD
OUTPUT TO
8255
ADC
51
thyristor, gives as output of very low power. In general in most of cases output power
is not sufficient to drive the gate directly. Therefore a amplifier circuit is required.
For isolation between control and power circuit, use of pulse transformer is
common. Figure 5.5 shows a driver and buffer circuit. A high frequency positive
pulse from an oscillator is applied to an AND gate continuously. These pulses are
enabled to reach the base of transistor only when the input drive control signal is high.
Transistor basically acts as a switch to energize the primary winding of the pulse
transformer corresponding to each pulse. In secondary winding pulses of almost same
strength are produced due to transformer action.
(a)
(b)
Fig. 5.7: Driver and Buffer circuit (a) circuit diagram, (b) photograph
GATE
PULSE
ISOLATION
TRANSFORMER
OSCILATOR
GATE PULSES
FROM
MICROCONTROLLER
52
5.5 POWER UNIT CIRCUIT DESCRIPTION
The power circuit, which consist thyristors, is a high voltage circuit (normally
of the order of several hundreds of volts).
Power unit comprises of the following components:
1. Line commutated inverter and
2. Solar photovoltaic
5.5.1 Single Phase Fully Controlled Converter
Single Phase Fully Controlled Converter with RLE load is shown in Figure 5.8.
(a)
(b)
Fig. 5.8: Single Phase Fully Controlled Converter with RLE load (a) circuit diagram,
(b) photograph
SCR
SNUBBER
CIRCUIT
53
CHAPTER 6
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
6.1 ZERO CROSSING DETECTOR
The output of zero crossing detector is given in figure 6.1. output of zero
crossing detector is not only detecting the zero crossing of supply but also produce a
high pulse of 5 V corresponding to the positive cycle of the supply as given in figure
6.2. Negative pulse is blocked by diode.
Fig.6.1: Output of zero crossing detector
Fig.6.2: Output of Zero Crossing Detector as square wave
54
6.2 DELAY TIME CALCULATION
Timer clock frequency F
C
= 1/12 of the crystal frequency F
XT
;
Crystal frequency=11.0592 MHz
F
c
= 11.0592 MHz / 12 = 921.6 kHz.
Time period Tc = 1/921.6 kHz = 1.085us.
Delay time = number of counts 1.085us.
Calculation of the values to be loaded into the TL and TH registers:
(i) Required delay is divided by 1.085 us
(ii) Value obtained in (i) is subtracted from 65536
(iii)Value obtained in (ii) is converted into hex as ABCD
(iv) Load TL = AB and TH = CD
55
6.3 SYNCHRONIZATION
Control pulse generated by the microcontroller must be synchronized with
supply. If control pulse is not synchronized with supply frequency the power circuit
triggered wrongly. It is clear from the output shown in figure 6.3 that pulse generated
by microcontroller is synchronized with supply frequency.
(a)
(b)
Fig.6.3: synchronized pulse (a) synchronized with +ve cycle (b) synchronized with -
ve cycle
OUPUT OF ZCD
CONTROL PULSE
56
6.4 TRIGGERING PULSES
The topology of inverter used in the proposed work is fully controlled full wave
inverter. This topology of inverter has bridge of four thyristers. Four triggering pulses
are required to trigger the thyristors of this topology. The thyristers T1 and T2 are
triggered simultaneously with same type of gate pulse G1 and G2 and other two
thyristers T3 and T4 required gate pulse G3 and G4 complementary to the gate pulses
of thyristers T1 and T2.
The control or triggering pulses generated experimentally various delay time is being
depicted below.
The converter circuit work as an inverter only when thyristers are trigger after
90 degree and there is an inductive load connected to circuit. Triggering pulse of any
delay can be generated by microcontroller by feeding suitable value to timer just by
changing the program without any change in hardware. The waveform record of
control pluses generated by controller for various time delays is given in Fig. 6.4, 6.5,
6.6, 6.7 and 6.8.
(a)
(b)
Fig.6.4: control pulse with 5ms delay (a) generated by controller for G1 and G2 (b)
generated by controller for G3 and G4
57
(a)
(b)
Fig.6.5: control pulse with 6 ms delay (a) generated by controller for G1 and G2 (b)
generated by controller for G3 and G4.
(a)
(b)
Fig.6.6: control pulse with 7 ms delay (a) generated by controller for G1 and G2 (b)
generated by controller for G3 and G4
58
(a)
(b)
Fig.6.7: control pulse with 8 ms delay (a) generated by controller for G1 and G2 (b)
generated by controller for G3 and G4
(a)
(b)
Fig.6.8: control pulse with 9 ms delay (a) generated by controller for G1 and G2 (b)
generated by controller for G3 and G4
59
6.5 OUTPUT VOLTAGE WAVEFORM
The output wave forms obtained experimentally are given in figure 6.9 and
6.10. It is clear from the negative value of output voltage wave form that power is
being transferred to grid from the solar photovoltaic panel connected to the load side.
Fig. 6.9: Output Voltages and Load Current Waveform for different Triggering
angles
OUTPUT VOLTAGE LOAD CURRENT
60
Fig.6.10: Output voltage waveform and source current waveforms
SOURCE CURRENT
VOLTAGE ACROSS LOAD
61
CHAPTER-7
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE SCOPE
7.1 CONCLUSIONS
The use of microcontroller based control circuit provides us large number of
advantages. It reduces size and cost of controller significantly. The efficient control of
delay angle is the main advantage.
Besides this it provide more versality and greater scope for further
improvement just by changing the program but not hardware configuration.
This work is carried out by breaking it into several steps for its smooth and
successful completion.
The first stage consisted of generating control pulse which corresponds to peak
power of solar photovoltaic module.
The first stage, a synchronized control pulse for an ac to dc converter/ inverter
for the full wave was generated. After getting satisfactory results then delay program
was changed to generate a control pulse whose delay angle was adjusted beyond 90
degree to operate converter in inversion mode, at this condition the converter supplies
the energy from solar photovoltaic cell to grid.
The developed relation between open circuit voltage and voltage corresponding
to maximum power point is unique for a module. Peak power tracked by this method
is very accurate.
. The performance of controller is found satisfactory. In general switching
control mode as well as specific application mode for solar photovoltaic grid
interactive inverter. The wave form records shows accuracy of delay of control pulse
and also show the satisfactory performance of whole setup.
62
7.2 FUTURE SCOPE OF THE WORK
Following study can be carried out in future:
1. Following analysis can be carried out before field implementation:
(i) Total harmonic distortion of grid power quality
(ii) Power inversion analysis
(iii) Developed method for tracking of Pmax implement experimentally
(iv) Cost analysis
2. Programming microcontroller for the grid interactive in all weather condition for
three phase system.
3. The developed relation between Voc and Vmpp should be derived by
experimental setup.
4. Controller can be used for the control of FACTS devices by little modification.
5. This controller can be applied in HVDC transmission.
63
LIST OF PUBLICATIONS
1. Zameer Ahmad and S.N. Singh, Modeling and Control of Grid Connected
Photovoltaic System-A Review International Journal of Emerging Technology
and Advanced Engineering (ISSN 22502459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal,
Volume 3, Issue 3, March 2013).
2. Zameer Ahmad and S.N. Singh, Extraction of the Internal Parameters of Solar
photovoltaic Module by developing Matlab / Simulink Based Model International
Journal of Applied Engineering Research, ISSN 0973-4562 Vol.7 No.11 (2012).
3. Zameer Ahmad and S.N. Singh, Microcontroller Based Advanced Triggering
Circuit for Converters/Inverters (Submitted).
64
REFERENCES
[1] Ned Mohan, Power Electronics, Applications and Design, John Wiley &
Sons, 3
rd
Edition, 2002.
[2] Asghar, M.S power electronics, Delhi, Prentice H. India, 2004.
[3] World Energy Assessment Energy & the Challenge of Sustainability UNDP,
2000.
[4] www.mnre.gov.in/mission-and-vision-2/achievements, 10 may, 2013.
[5] National Renewable Energy Laboratory http://nrel.com
[6] http://www.maproyalty.com/solar.html, 10, Feb, 2013.
[7] www.bca.gov.sg/publications/.../handbook_for_solar_pv_systems.pdf 16 may,
2013
[8] http://nptel.iitm.ac.in/video.php?subjectId=108105058, 8 may, 2013.
[9] Walid Omran, Performance Analysis of Grid-Connected Photovoltaic
Systems Philosophy of doctorate Thesis, Electrical and Computer
Engineering, Ontario, Canada, 2010.
[10] Mazidi, Muhammad Ali & Mazidi, Janice Gillispie, the 8051 microcontroller
and embedded system, Pearson education, 7
th
Indian reprint, 2004.
[11] Ayala, j. Kenneth, the 8051 Microcontroller Architecture Programming and
Applications, 2
nd
Edition.
[12] www.viit.ac.in/8051_Micro_controller.pdf, 20 may, 2013-05-22
[13] M.H.Rashid, Power Electronics Circuits, Devices and Application, Delhi,
Prentice H. India, 3rd Edition, 2004.
[14] http://nptel.iitm.ac.in/courses/Webcoursecontents/IIT%20Kharagpur/Power%
20Electronics/New_index1.html.10 May, 2013.
[15] www.ece.colorado.edu/~ecen5797/ ECEN4797/5797 Intro to Power
Electronics.25/11/12. 13, March, 2013.
[16] http://nptel.iitm.ac.in/courses/108101038/. 12, March, 2013.
[17] Carrasco, Leopoldo, Bialasiewicz, Galvn and Guisado, Power Electronic
Systems for the Grid Integration of Renewable Energy Sources: A Survey
IEEE transactions on industrial electronics, volume 53, number 4, August
2006.
65
[18] K. C. Kalaitzakis and G. J. Vachtsevanos On the Control and Stability of
Grid Connected Photovoltaic Sources. IEEE Transactions on Energy
Conversion, Volume EC- 2, Number 4, December 1987.
[19] R. Magureanu, Mihaela, Dumitrescu, M. Priboianu A practical solution for
grid connected dispersed generation from renewable sources: DC connection,
International Symposium on P.E., Electrical Drives, A and M, 2006.
[20] C.V .Nayar Control and Interfacing of Bi-directional Inverters for Off-Grid
and Weak Grid Photovoltaic Power Systems 2000 IEEE.
[21] C. Gonzalez-Moran, P. Arboleya, Member, IEEE, G. Diaz, Member, IEEE, J.
Gomez-Aleixandre Member, IEEE Modeling Photovoltaic DC primary
sources as grid connected inverter supplies considering non-linear effects,
IEEE Conference Electrical Power, Canada, 2007.
[22] Mei Shan Ngan and Chee Wei Tan A Study of Maximum Power Point
Tracking Algorithms for Stand-alone PV Systems, IEEE Applied power
Electronics colloquium (IAPEC), 2011.
[23] Martina Calais and Agelidis, Multi level converter for single phase grid
connected photovoltaic system an overview 1998 IEEE.
[24] Gianfranco Chicco, Roberto Napoli and Filippo Spertino, Experimental
Evaluation of the Performance of Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Systems
IEEE MELECON 2004, May 12-15, 2004, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
[25] Massimo Aiello, Cataliotti, Salvatore, and Graditi, Theoretical and
Experimental Comparison of Total Harmonic Distortion Factors for the
Evaluation of Harmonic and Inter harmonic Pollution of Grid-Connected
Photovoltaic Systems IEEE transactions on power delivery, Volume 21,
Number 3, JULY 2006.
[26] Hirotaka Koizumi, Mizuno, Takashi, Yukihisa, Norio, Manabu Kawasaki, Ken
Nagasaka, and Kurokawa, A Novel Microcontroller for Grid-Connected
Photovoltaic Systems, IEEE transactions on industrial electronics, Volume
53, Number 6, December 2006.
[27] G. Brando, Dannier, Rizzo, Power Electronic Transformer application to
Grid Connected Photovoltaic Systems 2009 IEEE.
[28] Javier Chavarra, Domingo Biel, Francesc Guinjoan, Carlos Meza, , and Juan
J. Negroni, Energy-Balance Control of PV Cascaded Multilevel Grid-
Connected Inverters Under Level-Shifted and Phase-Shifted PWMs IEEE
66
TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, Volume 60, Number
1, JANUARY 2013.
[29] D.C. Riawan and Nayar, Analysis and Design of a Solar Charge Controller
Using Cuk Converter IEEE.
[30] P. HUYNH and B. H. CHO, Design and Analysis of a Microprocessor-
Controlled PPT System, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND
ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS Volume 32, Number 1, JANUARY 1996.
[31] Kim, Hyunmin, A New PPT for Cost-Effective Photovoltaic Power System
0-7803-3547-3-7161 $ 4.00 0 1996 IEEE.
[32] G. Brando, Dannier and Rizzo, A Sensor less Control of H-bridge Multilevel
Converter for Maximum Power Point Tracking in Grid Connected
Photovoltaic Systems 2007 IEEE.
[33] Theodore Amissah OCRAN, CAO Junyi CAO Binggang, SUN Xinghua,
Artificial Neural Network Maximum Power Point Tracker for Solar Electric
Vehicle TSINGHUA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY I S S N 1 0 0 7 - 0 2
1 4 12/23 pp204-208, V o l u m e 10, N u m b e r 2, A p r i l 2005.
[34] Koutroulis and Frede, A New Technique for Tracking the Global Maximum
Power Point of PV Arrays Operating Under Partial-Shading Conditions IEEE
JOURNAL OF PHOTOVOLTAICS, Volume 2, Number 2, APRIL 2012.
[35] Arun Kumar Verma, Bhim Singh, and D.T Shahani, Fuzzy-Logic Based
MPPT Control of Grid Interfaced PV Generating System with Improved
Power Quality 2012 IEEE.
[36] Ali Nasr Allah Ali1, Mohamed H. Saied2, M. Z. Mostafa3, T. M. Abdel-
Moneim3, A Survey of Maximum PPT techniques of PV Systems 2012
IEEE.