The David Hamel Scalar Generator

THE DAVID HAMEL SCALAR GENERATOR
by courtesy of Dan LaRochelle

created on 05-05-97 - JLN Labs - Last update 05-31-98

Dan LaRochelle has recently visited David Hamel in Canada and he sent to me some interesting informations about the David Hamel
Scalar Generator.
<<Mr. Hamel showed me pictures of this device when I went to see him in Canada.
He said this device produced many different Scalar effects. It could also be used to generate Scalar Currents.
The Rings of this device are built just like the "Bedini Gate" All the same magnet poles on the inside and outside of each ring.When I
went to see David Hamel in Canada, he showed me pictures of this device in operation. The photos were double exposed or fogged!
David Hamel said there were other scalar effects from this device as well!
The Mechanical Rotation of the Rings is just to show you how each ring moves in relation to each other.
>>
Dan LaRochelle

This device is actually being tested.

The main power stage

The disc magnet #1 is in attraction to the disc magnet #2 (with the control rod attached to it)
The disc magnet #2 is in repulsion to the disc magnet #3 (with the control rod going up through it)

Email : JNaudin509@aol.com

Return to Hamel Technologies home page

The Hamel Spinning Disc Experiment V2.0
10 March 97 - Jean-Louis Naudin

This device is based on Hamel magnetic motor demonstration. The Magnetic gate is build with 13 ferrite magnets 40x25x10 mm
sticked outside a 100 mm PVC tube. The Hamel spinning disc is build with a ring magnet (outer diam.70 mm, inner diam. 33 mm, 8
mm thick) sticked on a 67 mm steel ball (490 gr weight).
Operation :
Take your magnetic gate in hands under the Hamel spinning device. The ring magnet start to spin fast like a top, if you tune correctly
the distance between the magnetic gate and the ring magnet.The magnetic gate above must be tilted and slightly offset axially... poles
arranged so the magnets attract, not repel.
Comments :
I can keep it spinning by moving and tilting the upper assy slowly from side to side. This changes the force vector to one side of the
ring/ball and precession takes over. This MANUAL ALTERATION (with hands !!) of the force vector and precession is the reason of
the result spin. If you put the magnetic gate in a fixed position, the Hamel spinner disc begin to spin but stops after a short time.......
( For more informations about "magnetic gate" see at : J ohn Bedini's Magnetic Gate )

If you need more informations or if you have any suggestions send me your Feedback


The Hamel Antigravity Device Project
created on 9 May 1997- JLN Labs - Last update on September 23th, 1999


Detailled Parts

The Hamel "Antigravity" device seems to be a "Multi-Stages Parametric Resonator". The first cone element (at the
top) is the first activator, which ring with the second cone element and transmit the mechanical wobble throught a
magnetic coupling.
If we considered the spinning rate from the bottom to the top :
vC1 is the angular speed of the lower component C1
vB1 is the angular speed of component B1
vA2 is the angular speed of component A2
vA1 is the angular speed of component A1
The ratio of angular speed is :
vB1 =2 vC1 , vA2 =2 vB1 , vA1 =2 vA1
( the angular speed ratio are : 1 : 2 : 4 : 8 from the bottom to the top )
A standing wave starts from the bottom towards the top of the device with differents time frames.
This is a wonderfull "Multi-Stages parametric resonator" design with magnetic coupling.
The result is a magnetic vortex of energy from the bottom to the top produced by the spin and the magnetic
compression process.


Return to Previous page

Basic Explanation of the principle
" A tornado-like rushing of air moved up through the ship to produce a tremedous friction. The cone withing cone wobbled at high
speed and were kept continously off-balance. As the cones wobbled and the air rushed between them, lighting-like flashes appeared
between them. Hamel was shown the outside rim of the ship, where numerous opening served to allow the in and out motion of the air
as it rushed between the wobbling cones. These air opening controlled not only the amount of air but the direction of flow. As the air
was moved at high velocities through the gap between woobling cones, it became ionized to produce a stream of charged particles.
The cones not only produced energy but also provided propulsion. This was accomplished by a small weighted ball, rolling in circular
path in a restricted space. The circular movement of this ball ( remember you the Hamel spinning top experiment (see my video ))
appeared to have a falling motion, always seeking equilibrium.

The upper area of the cones were suspended on magnetic parts which were kept unbalanced to sustain the disruption of equilibrium to
produce the wobbling effect. Imagine a horizontal disk, suspended on point, forever falling or tilting sideways as a metal ball rolled
forward on its rim. This produced the grateful fluttering effect which Hamel likened to ' a butterfly above a magnetic field '. The
magnet would not wear out because they were suspended on a magnetic field. Movement of the cones produced an electro-
gravitational field to cause the ship to lose its connection with gravity, thereby neutralizing it's 'weight'. Movement of the ship could
be controled by pulling the ball out of rotation......" Ref document : "Hamel.asc" (KeelyNet BBS/ J erry Decker)

This device use two principles. The first is call: "Weight into Speed", the second is the "Magnetic Principle" :
The "Magnetic Principle" : It uses same principle as the "Hamel Spinner". The destabilizing magnet on top is the "Hamel Spinner"
and the first Cone that wobbles would equate to the smaller disc magnet and ball bearing. The Spinner wants to move in a circular
path under the larger destabilizing magnet. That is in part why the cones Wobble. The cones want to seek equilibrium, but can only
find it in a dymanic way ! The field that developes inside and around the device is a gravity well.

The "Weight into Speed" principle : This pulls on the Cones or in the case of the "Weight into Speed" principle, pulls on the
Granite Ball! The Ball continually falls into a black hole of potential energy, but never finding it in the process! A continuous motion!

Both the "Magnetic principle" and the "Weight into Speed" devices will, if built right, run for many thousands of years !

Thanks to Dan LaRochelle

Detailled parts of the device ( click here )
Basic Explanation of the principle
" A tornado-like rushing of air moved up through the ship to produce a tremedous friction. The cone withing cone wobbled at high
speed and were kept continously off-balance. As the cones wobbled and the air rushed between them, lighting-like flashes appeared
between them. Hamel was shown the outside rim of the ship, where numerous opening served to allow the in and out motion of the air
as it rushed between the wobbling cones. These air opening controlled not only the amount of air but the direction of flow. As the air
was moved at high velocities through the gap between woobling cones, it became ionized to produce a stream of charged particles.
The cones not only produced energy but also provided propulsion. This was accomplished by a small weighted ball, rolling in circular
path in a restricted space. The circular movement of this ball ( remember you the Hamel spinning top experiment (see my video ))
appeared to have a falling motion, always seeking equilibrium.

The upper area of the cones were suspended on magnetic parts which were kept unbalanced to sustain the disruption of equilibrium to
produce the wobbling effect. Imagine a horizontal disk, suspended on point, forever falling or tilting sideways as a metal ball rolled
forward on its rim. This produced the grateful fluttering effect which Hamel likened to ' a butterfly above a magnetic field '. The
magnet would not wear out because they were suspended on a magnetic field. Movement of the cones produced an electro-
gravitational field to cause the ship to lose its connection with gravity, thereby neutralizing it's 'weight'. Movement of the ship could
be controled by pulling the ball out of rotation......" Ref document : "Hamel.asc" (KeelyNet BBS/ J erry Decker)

This device use two principles. The first is call: "Weight into Speed", the second is the "Magnetic Principle" :
find it in a dymanic way ! The field that developes inside and around the device is a gravity well.

The "Weight into Speed" principle : This pulls on the Cones or in the case of the "Weight into Speed" principle, pulls on the
Granite Ball! The Ball continually falls into a black hole of potential energy, but never finding it in the process! A continuous motion!

Both the "Magnetic principle" and the "Weight into Speed" devices will, if built right, run for many thousands of years !

See also :
The detailled diagram of the Hamel Flying Saucer ( updated 08-21-99 )
The H.F.S. pictures album courtesy of the Hamel's teamwork.( updated 09-21-99 )



The Hamel Spinning Disc Experiment V1.0
3 March 97 - Jean-Louis Naudin

I have built the first test model of Hamel spinner disc, I use 10 ferrite magnets 25x5x40 mm magnetic poles inward mounted in 10 cm
PVC cylinder. For the spinning device, I use the Levitron on glass sheet ( it it a very frictionless 28 mm ring magnet mounted as a
spinning top ). The "magnetic gate" is 50 mm above the glass sheet with a FIXED appartus.
The Levitron device is spinning for about 6 mn aligned on magnetic gate axis under the "magnetic gate".
( For more informations about "magnetic gate" see at : J ohn Bedini's Magnetic Gate )

If you need more informations or if you have any suggestions send me your Feedback


The Hamel Flying Saucer

A Gravitomagnetic Drive...
created on 08-21-99 - JLN Labs - last update on 08-22-99

The Gravitomagnetic drive is the David Hamel Flying Saucer, these 3D designs are based on the original 2D diagrams
courtesy of Dan La Rochelle.

See Also: The Hamel Flying Saucer Pictures Album



The David Hamel's Pictures Album
Courtesy of Tracy from the Hamel's Teamwork
created on September 18th, 1999 - JLN Labs - Last update September 21th, 1999

The Hamel's Flying Saucer (HFS) under construction

" The cone is all one piece. The horizontal wing surface is also one piece. Except for the top skin where I ran out of material I had
to use two pieces attached to a piece of 3/4 inch plywood. There is also 3/4 inch plywood at the bottom with a three inch hole in the
center and air holes around the bottom. There are no sections. The ribs on the horizontal wing portion are two 1/2 inch pieces of
aluminum striping joined together with a brass screw and then glued with the 3m glue. They act as stiffeners. The cone stiffener is
a round piece of 1/2 inch plywood half way down the cone and 1/2 inch aluminum strips from there to the horizontal portion of the
wing. It's very light construction weighing only 34 pounds without the magnets, but sturdy and strong enough to hold the wings in
place. It is my own design. " Tracy.

David Hamel working on his inner cones.

Inner Cones of the HFS.

" The top pic is David's current over-unity device. The bottom pic shows a large square portion of the bottom of the craft when
David completes its assemble. I think he used this for something else at one time, but he said that this will go at the bottom where
the iris is to be position. The corners will hold large pinions (size of bowling balls) of which the engine will be connected to using
extensions from the wings that will cause this plate to also vibrate. At least that's the way I understand the last phase of the craft. "
Tracy.

" The top pic shows the 2 x 4 x 6 inch magnets David had me install to give the wings more lift. There are 18 on one side of the
wing and 18 on the underside each in rejection to each other held in place by the brackets. David had marked then all with a large
N so I wouldn't get them mixed up. I was too busy trying to keep the damn things together and in place to notice what method he
used to mark the magnets. The center part with the rod sticking up is to hold the wings in place. I welded a small bracket to each
wing so the rod could slide all the way through when the wings were stacked. You can see the bottom part of the structure of which
the bottom wing rests on. Stainless Steel channel was used to hold the magnets in place and all are the standard rectangle magnets
from AZ Industries with the indentations facing towards the opposing magnets face to face. On the wing which you can't see is
another row of magnets directly underneath the row that you can see. All of these are also indented side facing indented side in
rejection.
The bottom pic shows the wing on the table before we moved it. " Tracy.
" This is the photo that Bob Thomas was so nice to send me that he received from David. Please note the channel where the
magnets are attached to. On his wings, there is no channel whereas the magnets are pop riveted directly to the skin. I will try to get
Bob to explain more fully via e-mail the set up of the photo. I believe this piece has been placed on David's living room table."
Tracy.

" These are two pics that I took summer of 98 while I was working on David's current engine.The measurement on the bottom pic
from point of the triangle measures exactly 8 feet. This is where the pinions go. The overall diameter is something like 9 and 1/2
feet whereas mine is 4 feet. The fellow next to David is a friend of his who helps him on Saturdays." Tracy

" Top photo shows where I welded the piece of pipe to hold the long spike that keeps the wings lined up so they don't move
when assembling the rest of the machine. This is a very important item and must be done exactly or else the wings magnets
will not be in rejection when the top wing is resting above the bottom wing. If the wings go to far from one side to the other the
magnets will come into attraction and lock up. The length of this movement is restricted by the pinions. There are spikes in
front of all three cups as pictured in the photo.

Bottom photo shows the rectangle magnets being placed on the bottom plate of the machine. You will notice there are no
perimeter magnets at the very bottom or the very top leaving the two wings in between which has the perimeter magnets. The
heavy looking rectangle piece on top of the cups is to hold the measuring triangle in place so that all magnets are placed
exactly where they are suppose to go. All magnets are pop rivet with stainless steel pop rivets and you want to be sure to
measure 3 or 4 times before you pop rivet that little puppy into place because they are very hard to grind off should you make
a mistake." Tracy.

These 3 cones are about 10' dia. It will make up the top section. The next
" Section will be 20 ft. and the next 40'. Photos include Mr. Hammel, his
workshop and a closeup of the magnets he is using. "
Photos sent by duesouth@iname.com (woody)

The Hamel's Drum under construction

" The top pic shows Bob Thomas's drum on the left and my insert on the right which I later used to go inside a 55 gallon drum.
The insert fits into the steel drum after you cut off 1/2 inch off the top so you and reqlue it back on. Bob cut some peek holes in the
side of his drum so he could watch it oscillate. I had done the same only at the top.
The bottom pic shows the inside of Bob's steel drum. " Tracy.
.

The Hamel's devices build Tracy Jones

The Drum, the Hinthorn device and the HFS wing build by Tracy.

The Plexiglass models (below)
" I had figured out how to solve the problem of the droopy wings by paying a very nice guy in a plastic shop to form me 4 domes
with the horizontal wings at only a cost of 215.00 per. He later did my inner cones for another 30.00 per. The only advantage of
doing this was not only did I not have any more problems with the wings, but you could see what was going on inside which was
pretty much nada. It's kind of fun trying to get smoke to go downward into the inner cones after you have forced it up to the top to
see how the air is suppose to flow using a lighted cigarette and blowing the smoke between the wings. Of course I was fortunate to
find a hacker to do this for me. " Tracy.

" The bottom right shows my cup for my diamond shape pinions scaled down to fit the domes. I was very fortunate in that my
friendly Canadian machine shop foreman only charged me 465 dollars for all nine pinions in US currency. I couldn't find an
American machine shop to do the work even if it was done in aluminum. I used my cue balls for the shoulder pinions. " Tracy.

" The bottom right was the cover I used for the top. I finished the device only to find some more nada. During this period of time I
had the good fortune to meet Dan Dial. I had decided to spend the winter in San Diego bugging Dan LaRochelle for any
information he might have on the subject and try my hand at using the Enhancer to help people help themselves. This was done
with high expectations of huge donations from those getting better all the time. However, most of my prospective clients didn't have
any money, but they used the machines anyway and I was able to sell a few I put together myself from kits I purchased from Dan. I
along with Bob Thomas left our machines at his place for him to study and maybe get the damn things to work. I returned the
following summer with great expectations on making yet a third hfs after working with David in Ontario. Dan decided it was too
much out of kilter to do anything with and he also informed me that plastic wouldn't work anyway. Dan now has the plastic domes
and I have some of the magnets in my third hfs. This one you already have seen some of the photos of which I have about 150 to
date. Don't worry, I won't be sending you these enmasse, but will accommodate anyone on an individual basis. " Tracy.

" The top photo shows the fan motor that finally burned up that I used to turn the floating magnet. The bottom shows the wiper
motor in action. None of the photos showed any sparking. However, the largest sparks came at the bottom of the shaft at the motor
where it was attached and the arm just before it turns down at a ninety degree turn. These two joints are loose so the arm could
move when the motor rotated. " Tracy.

" The top photo shows the wiper motor being hooked up. The bottom photo shows another night shot and the arm extended to the
bottom wing which was also loosely attached and showed sparks, but not in the photo. " Tracy.

Other Experiments ( below )

" This is the last photo of the series. The top photo shows an experiment that I made using the large aluminum cone hung by a
string from the ceiling. There are as many magnets as you see on the table on the bottom inside of the cone. I watch this cone
oscillate for a total of 45 minutes one day, just going back and forth.

The setup in the bottom two photos is an attempt to spin two magnets in rejection in opposite directions enclosed in the cones at
high speed. The best I did here was burn up one of the ac motors. The TV never blinked once. " Tracy.

Test reports
Sujet : hfs report 9/22/99
Date : 23/09/99 03:28:13
From: tracy@plix.com (Tracy)
Good evening everyone,
This afternoon, I designed a bracket to hold my old time Buick windshield wiper motor I purchased and attached a 1/2 inch
strip of aluminum to serve as the arm. This I attached to the bottom wing and began to oscillate the wing using my battery
charger as a power source. The bottom wing oscillates about 1/4 inch and the top wing slightly less. The center floating magnet
oscillates about 1/8 to 1/4 inch, and does not spin. Da fatlady was witness to this and I asked her to go home, a short distance
away, and give me a phone check. I have a power transformer located approximately 60 feet from the device and it's estimated
to be about 20 to 25 feet above the ground. The phone lines run from this pole to the house and the closest distance to the hfs is
approximately 30 feet. Most of the phone interference was towards the direction of these lines and pole. My portable phone
was disconnected 6 times with the furthest being about 5 feet and lying in a line towards the pole transformer. This line of
sight and closer to the hfs also produced the loudest noise interference and when the noise increased, it continued to do so until
the phone disconnected. The only other area of interference noted was below the device towards the edge between the phone
lines and the hfs, above the edge of the wing itself which is where the magnets are and the opposite side of the hfs from a direct
line towards the power pole. I then hooked up my TV along side the hfs on a level just above the wings and about 4 feet
distance. Without my cable hookup, I can only receive one station and the reception is very poor, but the sound is fine. I
noticed considerable interference with the tv, but not the sound. The strongest build up before the phone had disconnected was
when I oscillated the top wing by hand while the bottom wing was being oscillated by the motor. When I turned the motor off,
all the interference on the phone ceased. The windshield motor has been running for 75 minutes and I intend to leave it
running all night.
Far as I can determine, it will continue to operate barring any breakdown in the attached arm. The last disconnect was when I
had the phone close to the skin of the hfs and between the horizontal portion of the wing and floating magnet. The distance at
its strongest detected interference was when the phone was within 2 inches of the skin and it was like this completely encircling
the hfs. This is most interesting because it makes no difference concerning the location of the overhead phone wires or the pole
transformer. It remains a constant all the way around the hfs. If it is still here by morning and the motor is still operating,
then I will devise another design to hooked up the arm to the top wing and try that. I've also taken 5 photos of the
arrangement. Will keep you posted. Tracy.
____________
Sujet : report 2 hfs 9/22/99 @ 95 minutes
Date : 23/09/99 03:42:28
An interesting development just began. While still oscillating as before with only the motor, the TV is now resonating with the
movement of the wings with both the sound and picture turning itself off and on. I've asked DA fatlady to come over and
witness this development. Tracy.
____________
Sujet : report hfs 9/22/99 @ 215 minutes
Date : 23/09/99 06:17:23
The windshield wiper motor is still working and ever time its arms to the wing touch or move within the connected joints it
sparks and sometimes very much. This also happens when aluminum touches each other. It does not have to be steel. The TV
appears to just about had it with only large flashes showing every time it sparks. No program at all now. I was speaking to
Louis on the portable phone earlier and it disconnected on him also when I placed it close to the wings. I've taken two more
pictures with flash. It's now 9:02PM PST and will remain up for a while longer. I will also leave the motor running. Tracy.
____________
Sujet : report hfs 9/22/99 325 minutes
Date : 23/09/99 07:48:16)
The tests began at 4:50PM and it's now 10:15PM, that's 5 hours and 25 minutes or 325 minutes and the damn thing is still
looking like that pink bunny rabbit with the ever ready battery attached to it, It just keeps running and running, but no lift
off. I did make another test thinking that it must be grounded somehow to be sparking like it is. I detached the motor from the
top of the structure where I have it bolted and isolated it from the hfs while it was still running. The sparking continued when
ever the aluminum arm touched the frame as it leads to the bottom wing or when the arm moved while loosely attached to the
bottom wing. I rebolted it and then ran an alligator clip from the bottom wing and struck the top wing. No spark. When I
struck the clip to the frame from the top wing, still no spark. I then attached the clip to the frame on the opposite side and
struck the bottom wing, lots of spark, but none from the top wing when I struck it. Each time it sparks no matter where the
spark comes from, the TV goes bonkers with lots of large flashing from the screen. This flashing is so intense,it's like looking
down into the tube itself and seeing the rear end of the tube. Getting sleepy so will retire and check on it later. It's still running
now. Tracy.
____________
Sujet : PartslistTracyswheels
Date : 30/09/99 09:27:39
My shopping spree in Seattle netted me enough material to begin my "Tracy's wheels" within the next couple of days.
Tomorrow I will pick up from the machine shop my wheels and assembly will begin ASAP. In the meantime I will give you a
list of material I will be working with that I purchased in Seattle. This does not include a complete list because I will be using
material left over from my previous assembly and that which I will take off the current one.

The purpose of sharing this information with you is to let you know what I will be using and at what cost so you can compare
your costs in the event it works and you wish to assemble one yourself. I repeat, this is a modification of the HFS and is my
own interpretation of how it might work. When I begin assembly, I will make a report of what I've done and how I did it and I
will try to do this on a daily basis. I usually make my health report in the early morning hours and will do this report at the
same time. I will also be taking photos as I proceed and will try to make drawings when ever possible. Currently, my brother is
making a drawing from a sketch I left him while I was in Seattle. Soon as it is presentable, I will forward it to you. I trust that
if you will compare it to the HFS, you will understand it better. The object is to provide more surface area for what I consider
the cones to be a capacitor without making it bigger and at the same time easier to assemble. I've done away with the outer
rings and replaced them with a simple method of centering the rings (wheels) so the magnets remain in balance, but at the
same time move across one another. I've also designed it so the outer skin is insulated from the machine itself and provides a
means of air flow that will be vortex if in fact that is what is required. The center floating magnet is replaced with two fixed
magnets in the center of the hub in rejection to each other. I will be using soda pop cans for my cups filled with concrete and
miniature snooker balls (hard plastic of 1 and inch in size) for the pinions. I can also utilize the floating magnet I have now
at the top and have considered the magnetic motor Dan La has introduced to keep it spinning. Rather or not this is necessary
is yet to be seen. I have also designed a simple method to keep the entire device moving so that the two middle wheels will be in
constant movement until the device energizes itself if that's what it will do. If at any time when I am presenting this
information to you and you don't understand the procedure or have a suggestion for what you consider an easier method, then
by all means speak up and I will either explain why it can't be incorporated or will incorporate it at that time. The following is
a list of material I purchased for this assembly with a brief reason for its use in the machine. Most of the material was
purchased at the Boeing Surplus facility in Kent, Washington. Keep in mind concerning the quantity purchased is because of
the purchasing rules as follows: 1) What you see is what you get and no refunds. 2) If you can find another customer to share
your purchase, then you don't have to buy the entire selection (piece) on display. 3) All purchases are paid for by check or in
cash. 4) Pickup is usually made at time of purchase. 5) All material is new and is leftovers or obsolete from previous jobs. 6)
Tools, equipment, and furniture are usually all used. 7) Most material is sold by the pound as well as some tools (pliers,
specialized bits, etc.).

Material Description Use Cost

1. 2 - 4 x 12 ft. .010 aluminum sheets. Capacitors and inner cones 22.00

2. 1 - 5 x 12 ft. .032 aluminum sheet. Capacitors and skin 56.00

3. 80 feet x 3 feet wide thin rubber Possible insulator 20.00

4. 2' x 8' x 1" acrylic plastic Framing and spacers 50.00

5. 3 - 2" x 2" x 8' solid nylon possible framing alternative 13.00

6. 2 - " x 24" x 16" aluminum plate hub rings. 44.80

7. 12' x " rubber mat possible insulator 30.00

8. 28" x 28" x 1/8" copper plate and remnants general use 16.50

9. 2 large pieces of plywood w/1/16"alum coating possible structure 10.00

10. 4 - 20' x " rubber belt insulator for skin 4.00

11. 4' x 8' x 1" honeycomb aluminum sheet possible capacitor 16.50

Other items of small import such as 1" shrink tubing at .10 cents a foot to put magnets in to hold in place for other
experiments, 500 plastic ties of different sizes, 7.10, 10 drill bits .40 cents total, two small wire cutters 1.00, etc.

Tacoma Screw Products:

1. 500 aluminum 1/8 x rivets 12.30

2. 500 aluminum 1/8 x 3/8 rivets 11.48

3. 400 aluminum 1/8 x rivets 7.10

4. 10 1/8 drill extra hard drill bits 14.00

5. 100 6-32 brass machine nuts 3.15

6. 100 1" 18-8 # 8 screws phil head 11.49

American Games:

12 miniature snooker balls (1 x inch) 24.00
The David Hamel's Pictures Album

The Hamel's drum in construction by Aldo Pando

See Also:
The Hamel 45 Gallon Drum diagrams and details
The Hamel devices and Tests ( pictures album ) by Tracy Jones
The Hamel Flying Saucer Pictures Album

Mail to arpando@arnet.com.ar (Aldo) or to JNaudin509@aol.com

The Hamel Free Energy Generator
created on May 1997 - JLN Labs - Last update September 23th, 1999
Thanks to Dan LaRochelle

This device use the "Magnetic Principle" :
find it in a dymanic way !
This "Magnetic principle" device will, if built right, run for many thousands of years !

This device is under construction, and NOT FULLY TESTED.
See also :
The Hamel devices and Tests ( pictures album ) by Tracy Jones ( updated 09-23-99 )
The Hamel drum in construction ( pictures album ) by Aldo
The David Hamel Technologies page by Justin Szymanek
The Hamel 45 gallon drum experiment by Steven Dufresne
The David Hamel device build by Frank Bonte


1 Febr uar y 1995

Notes on the Faraday Disc
A col l ect i on of essays
by Bruce DePalma

The Secr et of t he Far aday Di sc
" Pr i mar y causes ar e unknown t o us; but ar e subj ect t o si mpl e and const ant l aws, whi ch may be di scover ed by
obser vat i on, t he st udy of t hembei ng t he obj ect of nat ur al phi l osophy. " - Four i er

___________________________________________________

The Far aday di sc i s a magnet i sed wheel . A wheel i s an i nt r i nsi cal l y sel f - def i ni ng obj ect . I t becomes i t sel f
onl y when r ot at i ng. The pr oper t i es of t he wheel ar e det er mi ned by t he exper i ment s whi ch i nvol ve i t . The
st at ement : " wheel s wi t hi n wheel s" i s t he phi l osophi cal i nt er pr et at i on. Thr ough t he Far aday Di sc we can
connect t he f or ces of magnet i smand el ect r i ci t y t o t he i ner t i al pr oper t i es of space and t i me.
An i nt er est i ng pr obl emi s t he i ner t i al f r ame sense of t he Ear t h movi ng t hr ough space. The Laws of I ner t i a
gover n t he mat er i al obj ect s r est i ng on t he sur f ace of t he ear t h. But what of t he space sur r oundi ng t he
Ear t h. Woul d i t be t he el ect r i c, magnet i c, or gr avi t at i onal f i el d whi ch st abi l i sed t he i ner t i al f r ame or
can we posi t an i ner t i al f i el d of mat t er . I t i s cl ear t hat t he pr oper t i es of phenomena occur r i ng wi t hi n
mat t er ar e conveyed t o t he space sur r oundi ng wi t hout mat t er .
Because of t he conf usi on and ambi gui t y cr eat ed by Ei nst ei n' s " Pr i nci pl e of Equi val ence" , i ner t i a and
gr avi t at i onal f or ces have been l i nked. The sear ch f or a pur el y i ner t i al f i el d has been pr oscr i bed.
I f a f i el d exi st s ar ound mat t er whi ch conveys t he i ner t i al condi t i on of t hat mat t er t o t he sur r oundi ng
space t hen t he gener al pr i nci pl e woul d be: a t r anspor t mechani smexi st s whi ch ser ves t o communi cat e t he
i nt er nal condi t i on of mat t er t o t he sur r oundi ng space. Let us cal l t he i ner t i al condi t i on conveyed t o
sur r oundi ng space by mat t er t he od f i el d.
The od f i el d of mat t er can be mani pul at ed t hr ough r ot at i on, cr eat i ng t he ani sot r opi c i ner t i al ef f ect s
obser ved i n r ot at i ng gyr oscopes. For ced pr ecessi on of t he r ot at i ng gyr oscope cr eat es such a st r ong
i nt er act i on wi t h t he l ocal i ner t i al , od, f i el d t hat t he pr ecessi ng gyr o can be sai d t o " l ock i n space" wi t h
r espect t o t he l ocal i ner t i al f r ame. The mot i on of a mass poi nt i n t he r ot or of a pr ecessi ng gyr oscope i s
uni que and i s known as st r ept oi d, ( Gk. t wi st i ng) , and i s not a combi nat i on of r ot at i on and t r ansl at i on
whi ch ar e supposed t o descr i be al l mechani cal mot i ons.
Tr i ni cs, t he cal cul us of t hr ee di mensi onal mot i on i s i n i t s i nf ancy. The i nvent or of t hi s cal cul us i s J ohn
Sohn Wol f e, now deceased, and hi s book i s: Neo- Pr i nci pi a Mat hemat i ca, as yet unpubl i shed.
I t i s now r ecogni sed t her e ar e t hr ee cl asses of mot i on, i . e. t r ansl at i on, r ot at i on, and st r ept at i on.
St r ept at i on i ncl udes pr ecessi on, nut at i on, and hi gher or der s of t hr ee di mensi onal mot i on. I n or der t o
ext end t he sci ence of mechani cs t he f ol l owi ng exper i ment s ar e suggest ed:
1) F = MA i s not obeyed by an obj ect i n st r ept at i on. What ar e t he l aws of f or ce f or such an obj ect ?
2) Moment umi s not conser ved i n an el ast i c col l i si on of an obj ect under goi ng st r ept at i on wi t h a non- movi ng
cont r ol . What ar e t he l aws of el ast i c col l i si ons of st r ept at i ng obj ect s?
3) What ar e t he l aws of i ner t i a f or a st r ept at i ng obj ect . Woul d t he i dea of var i abl e i ner t i a i ncl udi ng
posi t i ve and negat i ve val ues be appr opr i at e?
4) The i dea of an od f i el d t hat coul d al t er t he mechani cal and i ner t i al pr oper t i es of mat er i al obj ect s i s
not par t of t he knowl edge of cont empor ar y mechani cs. Shoul d i t be, or shoul d t he i deas of mechani cs end at
t he sur f ace of al l mechani cal obj ect s?

The l i mi t s of sci ent i f i c concept i on whi ch emer ged i n t he 19t h cent ur y can be expr essed i n t he " act i on at a
di st ance" and wave pr opagat i on hypot heses r equi r i ng some sor t of spat i al medi umor aet her . Twent i et h
cent ur y par t i cl e physi cs and t he hypot hesi s of t he neut r i no opened t he way t o a concept ual i sat i on of space
f i l l ed wi t h a sea of par t i cl es. A space f i l l ed wi t h a sea of par t i cl es i nt er penet r at i ng mat t er and
possessi ng a r el axat i on t i me such t hat t he i nt er nal condi t i on of mat t er was i mpr essed on t hemand was t hus
conveyed t o t he sur r oundi ng space coul d be t he mechani smf or a t r anspor t pr ocess wher ei n t he i nt er nal
condi t i on of mat t er ; el ect r i c, magnet i c, gr avi t at i onal , heat , char ge, r adi oact i vi t y, i ner t i al et al . was
conveyed t o t he sur r oundi ng space.
I cal l t he par t i cl e whose condi t i on i s an i mpr essi on or memor y of i t s passage t hr ough mat t er , a psi on. Thus
t he basi c condi t i on of empt y space i s a psi on f i el d. Radi at i on l aws of emi ssi vi t y vs t emper at ur e and
i nt ensi t y dr op of f wi t h di st ance, i . e. 1/ r , 1/ r 2, and 1/ r 3 dependenci es ar e r el at ed t o t he r el axat i on t i me
of t he i mpr essi on cr eat ed on t he par t i cl es by t hei r passage t hr ough mat t er . One coul d assume t hese
par t i cl es, psi ons, t r avel at t he speed of l i ght . The t er mpsi on i s meant t o i mpl y an at omof consci ousness
whi ch r et ai ns an i mpr essi on of t he i nt er nal condi t i on of mat t er t hr ough whi ch i t has passed.
The Far aday Di sc
The Far aday Di sc [ r ef er ence 1] i s gener al l y t hought t o be a t wo pi ece machi ne consi st i ng of a conduct i ng
di sc r ot at i ng pr oxi mat e t o t he nor t h or sout h pol e of an axi al l y suspended f i xed magnet . I t can be sai d
t hat t hi s i nvent i on was i n par t suggest ed by t he ear l i er wor k of Ar ago and Bar l ow. The t r ul y uni que
i nvent i on made December 26, 1831 consi st ed of t he di scover y t hat t he magnet and di sc coul d be cement ed
t oget her , r ot at ed j oi nt l y, and t he same vol t age coul d be obt ai ned by sl i di ng cont act s t ouchi ng t he cent r e
and edge of t he conduct i ng di sc as was obt ai ned when t he magnet was f i xed and t he di sc r ot at ed al one.
I deas of f l ux l i ne cut t i ng and i nduced vol t ages wer e br ought f or war d t o expl ai n t he mechani smof vol t age
gener at i on i n t he r ot at i ng di sc but when t hese wer e appl i ed t o t he t wo si t uat i ons of di sc r ot at i ng
i ndependent l y or t oget her wi t h t he magnet , t hey l ead t o cont r adi ct or y i nt er pr et at i ons.
The t r ue di scover y of Far aday was t hat r el at i ve mot i on was not necessar y f or t he gener at i on of el ect r i ci t y.
I f r ar e ear t h or super conduct i ng magnet s had been avai l abl e i n t he days of Far aday and Maxwel l t he one-
pi ece homopol ar machi ne mi ght have become an ar t i cl e of commer ce. Compar i sons of t he ener gy ef f i ci ency of
t hi s const r uct i on wi t h t wo- pi ece Far aday or i nduct i on machi nes woul d have been made. The f ut ur e we now l i ve
i n woul d have been ener gi sed by t he one- pi ece machi ne and t he mechani cal equi val ent of heat woul d no l onger
squar e wi t h t he el ect r i cal equi val ent of heat . What t hi s woul d mean i n t er ms of cont empor ar y t heor i es can
onl y be guessed at .
Because t he Far aday di scover y, now known as t he N- machi ne Space Power Gener at or i s not per f ect , i t wi l l
never be possi bl e t o r educe t he dr ag of such a machi ne t o zer o i n t he pr oduct i on of an ar bi t r ar i l y l ar ge
quant i t y of el ect r i cal power . The r eason dr ag i s i nt r i nsi c i s because t he same space whose pol ar i sat i on
el i ci t s el ect r i cal power al so cont ai ns t he i ner t i al f r ame r ef er ence f or t he machi ne.
Exper i ment s [ r ef . 2] per f or med by t he aut hor have di r ect l y demonst r at ed t he dr aggi ng of a pur el y mechani cal
r ot at i ng r ef er ence f r ame agai nst a f i xed one.
The f or ce r el at i onshi p exi st i ng bet ween magnet i sed obj ect s di r ect l y i l l ust r at es t he i nt er act i on of separ at e
i ner t i al f r ames l i nked magnet i cal l y. I t i s possi bl e t o i nf er N- machi ne dr ag wi l l be r educed i n out er space
r emot e f r omt he i ner t i al i nf l uence of t he sun and pl anet s.
I n t he Far aday di sc exper i ment t he i nst r ument al i t y of evocat i on of t he magnet i c f i el d par t akes i n t he
i ner t i al f r ame- sense. Yet t he magnet does not par t ake i n any r eact i on t or que. The out put t or que of t he di sc
i s r ef er enced t o t he l ocal i ner t i al f r ame. Thus t he magnet onl y connect s t he gener at ed t or que t o t he l ocal
i ner t i al f r ame.
Thi s suggest s t hat i f t he magnet wer e t o r ot at e wi t h t he di sc t he t or que out put of t he machi ne woul d be
wi t h r espect t o t he r ot at i ng i ner t i al f r ame of t he magnet , al t hough t her e woul d st i l l be no net t t or que
r eact i on of t he di sc agai nst t he at t ached r ot at i ng magnet .
I n t he Far aday di sc, t he t or que i s r el at i ve t o t he r ef er ence f r ame of t he i nst r ument al i t y whi ch i s t he
evocat eur of t he magnet i c f i el d.
Unl i ke t he r epul si on of t he hyst er esi s or eddy cur r ent dr ag machi nes, t he gener at or dr ag of a Far aday di sc
must be an i nt r i nsi c dr ag mani f est at i on of t he pr eci pi t at i on of el ect r i ci t y. Consequent l y al l owi ng t he
magnet t o r ot at e wi t h t he di sc wi l l i ncr ease t he el ect r i cal power out put by not l et t i ng t he dr ag appear
t wi ce. Once wi t h r espect of t he el ect r i cal power gener at i on dr ag - aki n t o t he l ocki ng i n space of t he
pr ecessi ng i ner t i al gyr oscope and t wi ce by t he coupl i ng of such dr ag t o t he i ner t i al pl ane of t he Ear t h vi a
t he i nst r ument al i t y of t he magnet . I f t he magnet r ot at es t hen t he i ner t i al r ef er ence i s no l onger t o t he
Ear t h but t o t he r ot at i ng r ef er ence f r ame of t he magnet .
I n t he Far aday di sc, par t of t he dr ag ar i ses f r omt he i nt r i nsi c dr ag of el ect r on col l ect i on r el at i ve t o t he
l ocal f r ame, what I cal l non- r eact i ve dr ag. The bal ance of t he dr ag der i ves f r omdi r ect , act i on- r eact i on,
dr ag of t he r ot at i ng pol ar i sed member agai nst t he Ear t h r ef er ence f r ame coupl ed t hr ough t he i nst r ument al i t y
of t he magnet .
I n t he t wo pi ece machi nes, ( ei t her i nduct i on or Homopol ar ) , t he r eact i ve dr ag coupl i ng i s accent uat ed by
t he pr oxi mi t y of t he mass of t he st at or . Thi s cannot be changed i n t he i nduct i on machi nes but t he one- pi ece
Homopol ar geomet r y avoi ds excessi ve st at or dr ag by el i mi nat i ng t he st at or . What r emai ns i s t he r eact i ve
r ot or coupl i ng t o l ocal space wi t hout t he pr esence of f er r ous mat t er , t o whi ch t he r ot or magnet i c f i el d
coul d coupl e, and t he i nt r i nsi c el ect r on col l ect i on dr ag r ef er enced t o t he l ocal space r ef er ence f r ame.
The pr i nci pl e of equi val ence exhor t s t he equi val ency of gr avi t at i onal and i ner t i al f or ces, but gr avi t at i on
i s not a r el at i ve f or ce, i . e. i t exi st s i ndependent l y of r el at i ve mot i on. Al t hough t he vol t ages der i ved
f r omhomo- pol ar and i nduct i on machi nes may be equal , t he dr ags r esul t i ng f r omt he pr ocesses ar e unequal .
___________________________________________________

Copper i s an i nsul at or f or t he r ecombi nat i on of mal e- f emal e ener gi es. i . e. i nt er nal r esi st ance = zer o, wi t h
per f ect i nsul at i on. I had al ways been t aught t hat al t hough t he vol t age i n a magnet i cal l y l i nked ci r cui t was
Bl v t he cur r ent whi ch coul d be dr awn was l i mi t ed by t he ser i es r esi st ance of t he ci r cui t . Si nce t he vol t age
devel oped acr oss t he t er mi nal s of movi ng wi r e ar i ses f r omspace why shoul d t he cur r ent bei ng dr awn be
l i mi t ed by t he i nt er nal r esi st ance of t he wi r e connect i ng t he t er mi nal s?
The si t uat i on r esol ves i t sel f when we r egar d what i s devel oped acr oss t he t er mi nal s of t he movi ng
magnet i cal l y l i nked wi r e as a mal e- f emal e pol ar i sat i on and t hat r ecombi nat i on of t he devel oped pot ent i al s
i s r esi st ed by t he i nsul at i ng act i on of t he copper or si l ver " conduct or " .
The r eason copper and si l ver ar e good conduct or s i s because t hey r esi st t he r ecombi nat i on of t he mal e-
f emal e pol ar i sat i ons and can conduct t hese pol ar i sat i ons t o t he poi nt wher e t hey ar e mer ged t o r ecombi ne i n
some soci al l y usef ul manner .
The el ect r i cal met al s ar e usef ul because t hey can be used t o convey t he el ect r i cal pot ent i al i t i es f r om
poi nt t o poi nt whi l e at t he same t i me t hey i nsul at e t hemf r omr ecombi nat i on, t he st at e of neut r al i sat i on
ul t i mat el y r esul t i ng i n heat .
___________________________________________________

The si mpl est machi ne f or t he mechani cal ext r act i on of el ect r i cal pot ent i al s i s a r ot at i ng, magnet i sed,
el ect r i cal l y conduct i ng spi r al .

For si mpl i ci t y t he vol t age pi ckof f poi nt s ar e i ndi cat ed as br ushes. I n pr act i ce bot h cont act s ar e l i qui d
met al i n a symmet r i cal ci r cumf er ent i al ar r angement wher e t he cur r ent f l ow i s whol l y r adi al i nt o and out of
t he machi ne. Si nce i t has not been not ed t hat el ect r i cal sol enoi ds or coi l s commence t o r ot at e when
ener gi sed, i t i s cl ear t hat appl i cat i on of vol t age t o t he sl i di ng cont act s wi l l not cause t he machi ne t o
commence r ot at i on.
On t he ot her hand i f t he conduct i ng spi r al i s caused t o r ot at e at hi gh speed and an el ect r i cal l oad i s
connect ed bet ween t he t er mi nal s of t he r ot at i ng spi r al a vol t age i s qui ckl y devel oped. Thi s ef f ect can be
i ni t i at ed by a smal l " i nducer " coi l or per manent magnet br ought i n pr oxi mi t y t o t he r ot at i ng spi r al . The
f l ux f r omt hi s magnet i ni t i at es t he cur r ent bui l dup i n t he r ot at i ng spi r al . For shor t t er mexper i ment s
cur r ent s of 25- 50 Ki l o- amper es can be devel oped i n a l oad of suf f i ci ent l y l ow r esi st ance.
What i s i mpor t ant about t hi s exper i ment i s i t s non- r eci pr oci t y, i . e. t he r ot at i ng spi r al can pr oduce
vol t age and power when ener gi sed but a spi r al conduct or i s not known t o r ot at e when a cur r ent i s caused t o
f l ow i n i t .
What f or ce or i nf l uence gover ns t he l ocal r ef er ence f r ame? When t he pr ecessi ng gyr oscope l ocks i n space
because of i t s st r ept oi d ( t wi st i ng) mot i on does i t l ock i nt o t he space t hr ough whi ch t he Ear t h i s movi ng at
5 mi l es/ second, or does i t l ock i nt o t he l ocal ( Ear t h) f r ame, but why?
The magnet i c f i el d pr oduced by cur r ent f l ow t hr ough t he spi r al i s a di st or t i on of t he l ocal space. Thus we
can say t he magnet i c f i el d l i nks t he r ot at i ng f r ame of t he spi r al wi t h l ocal space.
The char act er i st i c of a r ot at i ng i ner t i al f r ame ( gener at ed by a r ot at i ng r eal mechani cal obj ect ) i s an
i ner t i al ani sot r opy such t hat f or axi al measur ement s t he i ner t i a i ncr eases but f or r adi al mot i ons t he
i ner t i al mass decr eases. Thi s di st or t i on of i ner t i al i sot r opy exi st i ng i n t he space ar ound a r ot at i ng
obj ect i s cal l ed an od f i el d. Al t hough t he magnet i c f i el d l i nks t he l ocal i ner t i al f r ame t he space of t he
l ocal f r ame i s di st or t ed and modi f i ed by t he i ner t i al l y ani sot r opi c od f i el d cr eat ed by t he r ot at i on of a
r eal mechani cal obj ect . The r esul t of t hi s i s t o r educe t he dr aggi ng act i on of an el ect r i cal l y pol ar i sed
r ot at i ng spi r al f or mot i ons i n t he pl ane of r ot at i on. Si nce t he pl ane of t he spi r al i s t he r ot at i onal pl ane
i t can be expect ed t hat t her e woul d be a r educt i on i n dr ag of such a machi ne i n compar i son wi t h an
i nduct i on machi ne pr oduci ng t he same amount of power . A f act bor ne out by exper i ment .
I t i s cl ear f r omt hi s t hat t he space of t he l ocal i ner t i al f r ame can be di st or t ed magnet i cal l y and
odi cal l y. The i ner t i al ani sot r opy of t he od f i el d r educes t he r eact i on f or ces gener at ed by t he ext r act i on
of el ect r i cal cur r ent f r omt he r ot at i ng conduct i ng spi r al . I f i ner t i al dr aggi ng can be el i mi nat ed i n t hi s
way, t hen t he r emai ni ng dr ag must be due t o t he cr eat i on of t he condi t i on of pr eci pi t at i on of t he mal e-
f emal e pol ar i t i es and t hei r r esi st ance t o depol ar i si ng ef f ect s, i . e. el ect r i cal l oadi ng.
I n such machi nes i t i s easy t o compensat e magnet i c f i el d di st or t i on t hr ough cur r ent wi t hdr awal by a
pr oxi mat e f i xed compensat i on di sc wher ei n t he out put cur r ent i s caused t o f l ow i n t he opposi t e di r ect i on.
Thus pol ar i sat i on cr eat ed i n t he r ot at i ng spi r al can be made i ndependent of t he f l ow of cur r ent si nce no
magnet i c f i el d di st ur bance i s not ed i n t he compensat ed machi ne wi t h t he wi t hdr awal of cur r ent . Under t hese
condi t i ons can i t be sai d t hat pol ar i sat i on ( mal e- f emal e) al one can i nvoke t he f l ow of el ect r i cal cur r ent
and t hat t he magnet i c f i el d i t sel f r esul t s f r ommal e- f emal e r ecombi nat i on wi t hi n conduct or s?
What i s pr eci pi t at ed i s quant i sed el ect r i cal char ge wi t h t he evol ut i on of heat - subst ances gi ve of f heat
when t hey cr yst al i se, and t he r ecombi nat i on of t he pol ar i t i es wi t h t he evol ut i on of heat .
Whet her i t be t he gener at i on of t he pol ar i t i es or t he mer gi ng of t he pol ar i t i es, heat i s evol ved i n bot h
pr ocesses. I n t he cosmi c cycl e of gener at i on, pr eser vat i on and dest r uct i on, heat i s evol ved i n gener at i on
and dest r uct i on and equi l i br i umi s saved i n pr eser vat i on.
The heat of evol ut i on of el ect r ons i s r ef l ect ed i n t he spat i al dr ag of t he pr i mi t i ve r ot at i ng spi r al N
machi ne. The bal ance of t he dr ag i s cont r i but ed f r omt he l i nkage of i ner t i al f r ames t hr ough magnet i sm, i . e.
a pol ar i sed conduct i ng di sc i s l i nked t o t he l ocal space f r ame t hr ough t he spat i al di st or t i on of magnet i sm
whi ch can be accent uat ed by t he near pr esence of f er r ous ( par amagnet i c) obj ect s, magnet i cal l y per meabl e
st r uct ur es - st at or s - , f or magnet i c f l ux pat h cl osi ng.
Mass i s coupl ed t o t he l ocal i ner t i al f r ame t hr ough t he mechani smof i ner t i a. Magnet i c l i nkages t o
f er r omagnet i c st at or s cont r i but e addi t i onal dr ag.
The cont r i but i ons f r omt he di f f er ent sour ces can be i t emi sed t hus:
1) heat of el ect r oni c cr eat i on of pol ar i t i es.
( heat of evol ut i on of el ect r ons)
2) i nt r i nsi c spat i al dr ag of a magnet i sed r ot at i ng
pol ar i sed conduct i ng di sc.
3) i ncr ease of i nt r i nsi c spat i al dr ag t hr ough magnet i c
i nt er act i on wi t h a pr oxi mat e f er r omagnet i c obj ect ,
i . e. a st at or *.

* The st at or pr esent s a modi f i cat i on of t he space i n whi ch t he r ot or must oper at e. Under t hi s condi t i on t he
i nt r i nsi c dr ag woul d be gr eat er i n compar i son wi t h f r ee space.

___________________________________________________

I n gener al , t he pr i mi t i ve machi ne i s t he r ot at i ng magnet i sed spi r al . Thi s i s an ant enna whi ch r educes t he
spat i al magnet i sed ener gy t o a f or mut i l i sabl e by manki nd, i . e. t he posi t i ve and negat i ve pol ar i t i es of
el ect r i ci t y. As wi t h al l ant ennas, f i el d di st or t i ons i nt r oduced by t he cl ose pr oxi mi t y of f er r o- magnet i sed
obj ect s, st at or s, upset t he symmet r y of ener gy wi t hdr awal and i nt er f er e wi t h t he oper at i on of t he ant enna.
Hi gher or der s of symmet r y ar e empl oyed i n t he cyl i nder machi nes. The r ot at i ng magnet i sed spi r al i s i n
r el at i on t o t he cosmi cal t i me ener gy as t he di pol e ant enna i s t o el ect r omagnet i sm. Rot at i on and magnet i sm
ar e combi ned i n a mat er i al obj ect const r uct ed f r oman el ement wher ei n t he r ecombi nat i on of t he per mi t t ed
pol ar i t i es i s mi ni mal . That i s t he N machi ne. We ar e def i nabl e by our t hought s and our t hought s have
r eached t he l i mi t of r esol ut i on.
The heat s of el ect r oni c pr eci pi t at i on and r ecombi nat i on cannot be sai d t o be equal si nce t he di f f er ence
bet ween t he t wo r at es must account f or t he pr esence of el ect r ons i n t he Uni ver se, whi l e at t he same t i me
t he Uni ver se i s nei t her get t i ng hot t er or col der . Thus i n most cases one coul d saf el y say t he heat s of
gener at i on and r ecombi nat i on ar e equal . Ohm' s Law can be sai d t o appl y, but one cannot r ul e out t he
possi bi l i t y of a speci al condi t i on, i . e. super conduct i vi t y, wher e di f f er ent Laws appl y. For an N machi ne
wi t h a super conduct i ng r ot or i s t he heat of el ect r oni c gener at i on 0 or i s a super conduct or a speci al st at e
of mat t er wi t h a zer o heat of el ect r oni c gener at i on and r ecombi nat i on. I f t her e i s a connect i on bet ween
heat of el ect r oni c l i ber at i on and N machi ne dr ag t hen a super conduct i ng r ot or shoul d be t est ed i n
compar i son wi t h a si mi l ar machi ne const r uct ed of " nor mal " , i . e. non- super conduct i ng mat er i al s.
___________________________________________________

The Secr et of t he Far aday Di sc

Al l sci ence consi st s of t he el abor at i on of pr i nci pl es whose mani pul at i on at t empt s t o descr i be t he
cont i nuous pal at e of Nat ur e. So when I speak of t he Far aday Di sc I can l ook upon i t as a power f ul magi cal
spel l or I t hi nk I can under st and i t i n t er ms of t he causal i t y of l ogi c. Does under st andi ng somet hi ng
r emove t he myst er y?
The gyr oscope i s a t ot al l y myst er i ous obj ect . At t empt s t o under st and i t mat hemat i cal l y have f ai l ed t o
expl ai n anomal ous i ner t i al and gr avi t at i onal behavi our . Do we under st and el ect r i ci t y? On deep exami nat i on
el ect r i cal l aws can be shown t o be i nconsi st ent wi t h Newt on' s Laws. We have a wor ki ng r el at i onshi p wi t h
magnet s and wi r es i n el ect r i cal machi nes, i s mor e necessar y?
I t seems t o me t hat t hi nki ng i n t he abst r act , and t he f or mat i on of t heor i es i s hel pf ul because t he
exi st ence of t hese t heor i es can posi t new exper i ment s. I n Real i t y anyt hi ng can be done, but of al l t he
t hi ngs whi ch can be done, whi ch ar e t he si gni f i cant exper i ment s? And why ar e t hey si gni f i cant ? The i mpl i ci t
ci r cul ar i t y of l ogi c cl oses i t and br i ngs us back t o si gni f i cance i n t er ms of t he pr i nci pl es on whi ch our
t heor i es ar e based. So do we know anyt hi ng except t he def i ned concept s of r el at i onshi ps bet ween el ement ar y
exper i ment s?
We accept a sel f - or gani si ng pr i nci pl e i n Nat ur e whi ch def i nes i t sel f . I n t er ms of wr i t t en memor abi l i a l ogi c
def i nes i t sel f as a sel f - or gani si ng pr i nci pl e i n Nat ur e. I f we l eave t he wor l d of t he pr i nt ed page we ent er
t he r eal mof musi c and subt l er vi br at i ons not suscept i bl e t o l ogi c. I s t hat wher e our sci ence ends? The
t r ee becomes once mor e t he t r ee and t he f or est t he f or est . We do not get t he wor l d we t hi nk we want , we get
t he wor l d t hat i s goi ng t o happen.
Bruce DePalma
References:
1) Far aday, Mi chael , Exper i ment al Resear ches i n El ect r i ci t y. 3 vol s. London: Ri char d and J ohn Edwar d
Tayl or , 1839- 1855.
2) DePal ma, Br uce, Pendul umExper i ment Dat a ( The For ce Machi ne) , 1975; avai l abl e f r omDePal ma I nst i t ut e.

Next Paper
Back to Homepage
Simularity Institute 22
April 1974

The Generation of a Unidirectional Force

by Bruce E. DePalma

________________________________________________________________________

Summary: The theoretical prediction and experimental elucidation of the variable ratio of inertial to gravitational mass of a
constrained gyroscope under forced precession opens up a new field of Inertial Mechanics. The controllability of inertial mass makes
possible the generation of thrust by mechanical motion alone. A new device, the Linear Force Machine, is described which operates
on a heretofore unrecognised interaction between rotation, magnetism, and inertia, to generate a unidirectional force as a solid state
interaction. The application of a controlled and directed mass field flow to the containment of a controlled thermonuclear power
reaction is discussed.
________________________________________________________________________

The Generation of a Unidirectional Force

Introduction: The mechanical generation of a unidirectional force, is shown to be a consequence of the variable inertia property of
matter.

The Linear Force Machine: A series of experiments
1
, has elucidated a variability in the ratio of inertial to gravitational mass of
real objects. The key to the unsuspected variability of inertia of real material object lies in heretofore unrecognised properties of
rotation. The possibility of inertial control makes practical the generation of a unidirectional force through purely mechanical
interactions.

There are many ways to control inertia of objects, but all of them are based on the primary interaction of rotation and inertia. The
simplest manifestation of the phenomena is the rotation of a spherical material object. Depending on the speed of rotation, the inertial
mass of the object will vary as the square of its rotational velocity. The ratio of inertial to gravitational mass may be found by
pendulum experiments. This ratio is defined as the OD number, this quantity having found to be dependent on the angular velocity of
rotation of the test object, its composition and geometry, and the value of linear acceleration which is applied to the rotating object to
test for inertial mass. All things considered then:

inertial mass
N
od = gravitational mass

For the simple spherical metallic object, the spinning ball, the od number may reach factors of five or so as the rotational speed is
increased to the point where the object will explode, i.e. 50,000 rpm for a 1 inch steel ball bearing. For practical controllability of
inertia, larger inertial variations must be created and be subject to control other than the rotational acceleration of a test object to
50,000 rpm and then back to zero again as part of a cycle.

A much more powerful interaction takes place through the precession of a constrained spinning gyroscope. The ratio,
inertial/gravitational mass, of a constrained spinning gyroscope can easily reach a factor of several hundred, depending on the velocity
of precession and the rotational speed. N
od
is, (at least) a function of the square of the precessional velocity. That is:

N
od
(precession) = K
2
2
+ 1 Where =gyro angular velocity
___________________________ and =angular velocity of gyro precession
K is a geometrical and physical constant.

A suitable mechanism for the demonstration of the unidirectional force is a mechanical arrangement based on the force machine. A
force machine, c.f. figure (1), is a combination of two mechanically identical gyroscopes, rotating coplanar and with parallel axes, in
opposite directions at equal angular velocities. Such a device allows us to study the properties of rotation without interference from
gyroscopic torques.

Figure (1a)

Since inertia is isotropic, it is clear that inertial changes engendered from procession are reflected in linear inertial changes as well. A
sequence of operation is indicated. Consider the energized (gyros turning) force machine. The machine is pushed away from the
experimenter in the low inertia (no precession) condition. When the machine is pulled back, however, the gyros are precessed at some
angular velocity . The condition of precession multiplies the inertia of the rotating gyroscopes by a factor of several hundred times.
This is reflected linearly and presents a strong resistance to the force exerted by the experimenter attempting to return the machine to
its original, (near) position.

A combination of linear and torsional oscillations, (the latter at
1
/
2
the angular frequency of the former), will produce a unidirectional
reaction force in the direction of linear oscillation of the energized force machine

A phase diagram showing the relationship of the linear velocity to torsional oscillation and the direction of net momentum flow,
appears in figure (2). A combination of mechanical linkages to accomplish this effect in a rapid cyclic manner is shown in figure (3).
The resultant momentum flow is a product of N
od
(precessional) f(t) and v(t) (linear motion), and represents the unidirectional reaction
force.

The machine of figure (3) has been constructed in our laboratory and delivers unidirectional reaction force in the pulsating manner
expected. The device is called a Linear Force Machine.

Inertial Mechanics: The field of inertial mechanics refers to that class of mechanical experiments wherein inertia becomes a
variable. Although the mechanical force machine demonstrates the usefulness of the variable inertia concept in the generation of a
unidirectional force; there are several reasons why such a machine stands in relation to its ultimate form in the same wise as the early
rotating mechanical radio frequency generators stand in relation to the modern high power vacuum tube or transistor radio frequency
power oscillators. In the first place the delivery of force or momentum impulses is in a pulsating manner. It would be highly desirable
to have the delivery of force or momentum in a steady manner. Secondly, the necessity of maintaining the condition of energization
of the force machine requires a steady high speed rotation of constrained gyroscopes. As well as the necessity for the supplying of the
rotational excitation via electric motors or mechanical gearing, the necessity for sturdy bearings to support the gyros under intermittent
reciprocating precessional torque reactions. The fact that these are problems of a conventional sort, which can be easily solved
through accessible bearing technology, does not mitigate against the search for a more desirable rotational-inertial interaction.

In the linear force machine thus far described, the form of the motion imparted to the force machine, is called "three dimensional".
The form of motion where driven precession is coupled with linear oscillation is called "streptation", a derivative of the Greek word
for twisting.

What is desired is a mode whereby streptoid motion can be achieved without mechanical linkages and reciprocation. Such a machine
would achieve the generation of unidirectional force without pulsation.

Inertial Drive: The ideal inertial drive would achieve a smooth flow of momentum in a desired direction with the resultant reaction
force of steady and constant magnitude. The method of accomplishing this result is through a heretofore unrecognized magnetic
interaction. With reference to figure (4) we observe a rod of medium hard magnetic material suspended within the gap of a permanent
magnet. The length to diameter ratio of the magnetic core determines the dimensions of the magnetic gap. From the front to rear of
the machine the magnetic gap is twisted 180 degrees. The magnetic core is suspended on bearings designed to withstand whatever
thrusts are generated by the machine.

Within the gap of the permanent magnet the magnetic induction is maintained such that the magnetic core is saturated under all
conditions of operation of the machine. Under such conditions the external magnetic field maintains alignment of the magnetic dipoles
within the material such that no projections of internally generated torque vectors, produced by rotation of the magnetic core within
the gap, can appear in the drive axis. This is the familiar disappearance of hysteresis torques under saturation conditions, and
represents the condition of constraint of a rotating gyroscope.

Motion of a magnetic material in a magnetic field sufficient to cause saturation elicits the identical inertial properties that have been
found in rotating real mechanical objects. What is necessary is to obtain the streptoid three dimensional motion in order to elicit the
unidirectional force. This is simply accomplished by twisting the magnetic gap so that in rotation the magnetic dipoles within the core
material are both twisted and translated. The combination of twisting and unidirectional translation is simply accomplished by
rotating the magnetic core.

In like manner to the precession torques of rotating gyroscopes, the hardness of the magnetic core material will determine the strength
of the interaction. The ultimate force handling capacity of the machine will be limited by the demagnetization of the rotating core
through inability of the external field to maintain constraint over the magnetic dipole interaction.

The machine of figure (4) becomes a fundamental drive unit, capable of generating a thrust against "space" itself, and thus may
replace all earlier methods of generating unidirectional motion, i.e. gears wheels transmission units for road travel, and propellers and
jets for airborne vehicles.

The Mass Field Effect: The ability to enhance the inertia of a rotating object controllably makes for the possibility of controlling
the flow of inertia. The mass field or OD field represents the possibility of storing energy in the inertial property of space. That this
has been shown as a field which exists is the result of our prior experiments. Now the possibility of a directional flow of that inertia,
the mass field, exists as a concomitant of the operation of the linear force machine. A directed mass field flow can have useful
mechanical applications.

The Hydrogen Fusion Reaction: Although it is cloaked in many mysterious terms relating to the properties of nuclear plasmas, the
fusion of hydrogen to helium is nothing more than another form of burning or combustion which can only take place under conditions
found in the interior of stars. Creation of such a condition here on Earth entails the creation of a region of space, a "bottle", wherein
the proper temperature and conditions for such a reaction are maintained. At a temperature of l0
9
degrees K, the necessary conditions
can be maintained only through a field of force.

Prior attempts to contain the reaction through electric and magnetic interactions with the charged plasma have failed through the
inability to generate sufficient forces for containment. Although at present, it is just an experimental possibility, it is suggestive to
consider a containment region maintained through the mass field flow of a suitable number of linear force machines arranged
geometrically with their force vectors convergent to delimit the reaction region.

Mass Field Flow: When an OD or mass field is created, its first order effect is to enhance the inertia of material objects immersed
within the active region. Momentum can also be transmitted through a mass field, and this is responsible for the conundrum of a
"mass field flow".

In general we associate a flow with the movement of material. The flow of momentum associated with the mass field of a linear force
machine, is, a directed flow of inertia which acts to produce a linear force on mass particles immersed within the field. The resulting
flow which takes place, is described by the motion of test mass particles. Thus, although the mass field does not itself flow, test
particles immersed within it are acted or by forces which cause motions similar to those of the fluid flow in liquid and gasses.

On the basis of this analogy we can see how a region of containment can be created by the geometrically symmetrical and radially
inward convergence of directed mass field flow. In many respects the magnetic core of a linear force machine resembles an antenna
whose directivity is a function of the length to diameter ratio of the rotating member. If this relationship holds true, it is suggestive to
consider the degree of focusability of these beams and the attractive and repulsive forces which may be set up in a properly directed
array. The potentialities of these arrangements need to be explored in every possible detail in view of the possible vital payoff in
terms of the controlled fusion reaction. Other possibilities of controlled and directed mass field flow are left to the imagination of the
observer.

Conclusion: The linear force machine, as a mechanical prime mover, replaces gear trains, propellers and jets, as a device for the
generation of thrust with one moving part, and the polarity of thrust determined by the sense of input shaft rotation, this machine
becomes a fundamental tool of our civilization. In degree of sophistication, this machine represents the level of scientific inquiry of
our society. The forces which use and make ready this device for the benefit of society, will have at their disposal a tool of
unprecedented force and power. The use of this machine to enable the controlled thermonuclear fusion reaction will inaugurate a new
dawn of civilized society on this planet, and will inaugurate the entrance of Man into interplanetary space and ultimately the stars.

22 April 1974

Bruce E. DePalma

(1) references to the force machine experiments:

a) Antigravity 9 J anuary 1973
b) The Force Machine Experiment 9 J anuary 1973
c) The OD Effect - A New Physical Phenomena 9 J une 1973
d) The OD Effect - Radio Frequency Shift Expt. 17 J une 1973
e) The Effect of Gravity on Rotating Objects 18 March 1974

Acknowledgement is given to Mr. John S. Wolf, (formerly of) 741 Torrington Place, Dayton, Ohio 45406, for the independent
development of the theory of the relationship of inertial to gravitational mass of a precessing gyroscope, and to whom the terms "mass
field effect"

and "streptation", are credited. Mr. Wolf is one of the pioneer investigators in this new field of inertial mechanics.

Back to Homepage

The David Hamel Scalar Generator

Transféré par

Informations du document

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

The David Hamel Scalar Generator

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

THE DAVID HAMEL SCALAR GENERATOR

by courtesy of Dan LaRochelle

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi