Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
[Course]
.
Palestine: Peace not Apartheid 2
Introduction to Author
Jimmy Carter was the 39th President of the United States from 1977 to 1981. Before
becoming president, he has served two terms in the Georgia Senate and was elected the 76th
He is famous for his role in the Camp David Accords, the Panama Canal Treaties and
Carter always had a strong emphasis on human rights; he was the driving force in
1979 behind the peace treaty between Israel and Egypt. His stand on Panama Canal Zone was
After leaving the presidential office, he along with his wife Rosalynn established The
Carter Center. The Carter Center is an NGO famous for its exemplary works for human
rights. President Carter received the Nobel Peace Prize for his monumental work on peaceful
solutions of international issues, human rights, and promotion of economic and social
development in 2002. He became the third U.S. President, after Roosevelt and Wilson, to be
honored with the Prize. He is the only Georgian besides Martin Luther King, Jr. to be so
honored.
He became a prolific writer after retiring from office, he wrote 21 of his 23 books in
these years. His books cover a multitude of topics, like humanitarian work and human rights,
Jimmy Carter was a witness of the famous Camp David Accords between Israel and
Egypt during his presidency, and had been personally involved in the Middle-East crisis, to
safeguard U.S. interests in the region. Apart from politics, he has been an industrious author
as well and has written bestsellers on varied topics like his childhood, his faith, American
history and off course, politics. Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid is another of his masterpieces.
The book emphasizes on the Middle East crisis and the issue of peace in the region especially
Israel's relationship with its neighbors. He has suggested ways to keep Israeli sovereignty and
Carter has always been a big voice on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In Palestine
Peace Not Apartheid, published in November 2006, Carter has voiced his opinion that Israel's
persistent control over Palestinian land is the basic hurdle to reach a comprehensive peace
treaty in the region. Although he admits that Arab citizens living in Israel have equal rights,
he still feels that Israel's present policies in the Palestinian territories make an apartheid
system, with two types of people living in the same land, but alienated from each other
completely, with Israelis dominant and depriving Palestinian Arabs of their basic human
rights. According to Carter, "The ultimate purpose of my book is to present facts about the
Middle East that are largely unknown in America, to precipitate discussion and to help restart
peace talks (now absent for six years) that can lead to permanent peace for Israel and its
neighbors. Another hope is that Jews and other Americans who share this same goal might be
motivated to express their views, even publicly, and perhaps in concert. I would be glad to
help with that effort." (Carter, J. (2006). Speaking Frankly about Israel and Palestine. Los
Angeles Times.) Critics have alleged a number of errors and misstatements in the book.
Palestine: Peace not Apartheid 4
Review
Carter starts his book with an interesting story. He writes that on his first visit to Israel
when he was still the governor of Georgia in the early 1970s, he met with the then Prime
Minister Golda Meir, who asked him to share his experience about his visit. "With some
hesitation," Carter remembers, "I said that I had long taught lessons from the Hebrew
Scriptures and that a common historical pattern was that Israel was punished whenever the
leaders turned away from devout worship of God. I asked if she was concerned about the
secular nature of her Labor government." Carter proclaims that Meir was stunned by his
boldness.
Carter argues that the "imprisonment wall" Israel is building to disconnect Israelis from the
Palestinians on the West Bank is an indication of Israel's belief in apartheid. But in the later
part of the book he says that the purpose of division here is not the same as was in South
Carter has traced the role of the U.S. in each of his succeeding administration, and has
also mentioned critical roles played by neighboring countries like Syria, Jordan, Lebanon,
and Saudi Arabia. Carter didn’t sound too happy when he talked about the role US has played
in resolving the issue. In a chapter on the Clinton period, Carter once again laid the blame on
the Israelis for the failures at Camp David. Carter presents the 1979 Israeli-Egyptian peace
agreement as a proof that old-time enemies can also coexist peacefully. He labels the political
permanent peace in the Middle East: some Israelis believe they have the right to confiscate
and colonize Palestinian land and try to justify the sustained subjugation and persecution of
increasingly hopeless and aggravated Palestinians; and some Palestinians react by honoring
Palestine: Peace not Apartheid 5
suicide bombers as martyrs to be rewarded in heaven and consider the killing of Israelis as
victories."
One can infer from it that the Palestinian violence is a reaction to the building of
Israeli settlements. Settlement movement and the expansionist ideology have caused great
harm to the Zionist dream of a democratic Jewish state. Many Palestinians and Israelis have
died because of this issue and it seems like the people of Israel have realized it.
Carter apparently wants to convince American evangelicals to review their support for
Israel. He is enraged over the behavior of Israeli authorities with their Christian citizens and
their holy places. Citing his first visit to Israel, when he toured Galilee, he writes, "It was
especially interesting to visit with some of the few surviving Samaritans, who complained to
us that their holy sites and culture were not being respected by Israeli authorities … the same
complaint heard by Jesus and his disciples almost two thousand years earlier." He further
writes about the security fence that it "ravages many places along its devious route that are
On the literary front the book has little to offer, but this gets neglected after noticing
the fact that the author is by no means a scholarly figure, but an experienced statesman.
Carter’s criticism over the Israeli authorities’ non-serious attitude towards the problem can
not be ignored by calling it anti-Israeli propaganda. He has provided the facts like Israel’s
unwillingness to comply with U.N. Resolution 242 and its failure to act on the agreements
made over the years in Washington, Oslo and many other places. He has also highlighted the
fact that Israel is still claiming land by means of settlements well within Palestinian
boundaries and still detains hundreds of Palestinians; men, women and children. He has also
Palestine: Peace not Apartheid 6
criticized various strategies and moves of Yasir Arafat and other Palestinian groups, but has
still laid most of the blame for the present situation on the Israelis and their U.S. supporters.
He especially targets Bush administration, particularly Rice, who has remained silent on the
issue for six years (the book was written in 2006). People may argue over his opinion and
may also deny his facts, but Carter believes that if someone wants to bring in a change,
Conclusion
People say that history will remember Carter as a better ex-president than president.
He has tried to present the reader with a history of Arab-Israeli conflict and the quest for a
successful resolution. In his learned opinion lack of permanent peace in the Middle East is a
"persistent threat to global peace" and claims that the stumbling blocks to an end of armed
conflict are Israel's reluctance to abide by international law and respect its past peace
commitments, and Arabs’ continual refusal to admit Israel's right to live in peace. His book
although, reflects his personal point of view, is a wonderful cornucopia of ideas expressed
with perfect clarity. He has made sure that nothing remains vague, when it comes to
Carter still hopes for a peaceful and comprehensive solution to regional issues, this
book is his personal effort to the cause. Carter assigns most of the blame of the problem to
Israel, saying that the Israeli leadership has generally destabilized the peace process by their
stubborn, hostile and illegitimate occupation of regions captured in 1967. He has laid lesser
blame on the Arab leaders. This book provides an excellent summary for those unfamiliar
with the past history of the issue and also presents a wonderfully flexible roadmap for peace.
Palestine: Peace not Apartheid 7
Reference
Carter, J. (2006). Speaking Frankly about Israel and Palestine. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved
carter8dec08,0,7999232.story?coll=la-home-commentary