Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
C and 70% moisture content, 194 mL/min of air ow rate and substrate particle size (20.7 mm) of LPP
for 96h. Results showed, that high levels of pectinase activities were obtained. The maximum pectinase
activity obtained was 2181 U/L. Maximum biomass and maximum specic growth rate of A. niger Aa-20
were X
max
= 8 mg glucosamine/g of LPP and
max
= 0.127 1/h. The LPP and the use of A. niger Aa-20 in SSF
suggest as a very promising process for pectinase production.
2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Pectinase or pectinolytic are enzymes, which degrade pectin
substances and are of great importance to the food industry. It
has been reported that microbial pectinases account for 25% of
the global food enzymes sales. These enzymes have been used
in several conventional industrial processes, such as textile, plant
ber processing, tea, coffee, oil extraction, treatment of industrial
wastewater [1]. An alternative for the production of these enzymes
is solid-state fermentation (SSF). SSF is a complex heterogeneous
three-phase (gasliquidsolid) andgenerally denedas the growth
of microorganisms, oftenfungi, onthe surface of a porous andmoist
solid substrate particle in which enough moisture is present to
maintain microbial growth and metabolism. This process is car-
ried out in absence or near-absence of visible liquid water between
the particles. This condition favors the development of lamentous
C (usually 24h).
Mycelial biomass was estimated for these dry samples by an indi-
rect methodology based on glucosamine content of A. niger [13,14].
Biomass concentration is reported as mg glucosamine/g LPP. The
residual substrate concentration was determined by total sugars,
using colorimetric method (phenolsulfuric).
2.4.3.1. Kinetic biomass growth parameter estimation. Although
various mathematical models can describe the kinetic biomass
growth, the most frequently used model describing the kinetic of
fungal growth in SSF is the logistic model, is also sometimes called
the VerlhurstPearl equation, originally developed for population
growth[12]. Biomass productioninthe column-traybioreactor was
estimated as X (mg glucosamine/g LLP),
m
is the maximal spe-
cic growth rate (1/h) and X
m
is maximal microbial biomass level
achieved. X
0
is the biomass (t =0). The estimate parameters X
m
and
reported by Mitchell et al. [12] were determined using a non-
linear regression data analysis of MATLAB Version 7.6.0, R2008a
software (MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, USA).
2.4.4. Pectinase assay
The crude enzymatic extract was assayed for pectinase activ-
ity. Pectinase activity was determined by measuring the reduction
groups liberated from polygalacturonic acid substrate. The corre-
lation between growth and pectinase production was established
using the LuedekingPiret model [15]. Furthermore, in order
to estimate the MichaelisMenten kinetic parameters, the ini-
tial hydrolysis rates were measured by varying concentration of
polygalacturonic acid (0.4, 0.8, 1.6 and 3.2g/L, respectively). The
reaction mixture contained 245L of polygalacturonic acid (dis-
solved in 50mM acetate buffer, pH 4.5) and 245L of the enzyme
extract. The reaction mixture was incubated at 37
C. After 30min
of incubation, the reducing sugars released were quantied. The
standard curve was established using galacturonic acid as reducing
sugar. One unit of pectinase activity was dened as the amount of
enzymerequiredtoreleased1mol of galacturonic acidper minute
under the assay conditions. All the measurements were made in
triplicate.
2.4.4.1. Determination of kinetic parameters for pectinase. The
MichaelisMenten constant (K
m
) and maximum velocity (V
m
)
values of pectinase were determined by measuring the activity
reactions rates (under the conditions given earlier). The kinetic
parameters K
m
and V
max
were determined using MATLAB software.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Physicochemical characterization of LPP
The physicochemical analysis performed on different LPP par-
ticle size showed (Table 2) that the content of total sugars was
highest at 2.00.7mm(mesh 25) with 59.15% on a dry matter basis.
Higher levels of crude ber were found about of (21.1425.57%) in
the different particle size. Total protein and fat for a particle size of
0.30.17mm(mesh 180) were higher, 6.15% and 7.8% respectively.
The protein content was lower than 6.15% in the rest of particle
H.A. Ruiz et al. / Biochemical Engineering Journal 65 (2012) 9095 93
Table 2
Physicochemical characterization of LPP (% dry weight).
Particle size distribution of LPP (% in dry matter basis)
>2.0mm 2.00.7mm 0.70.3mm 0.30.17mm
Mesh 10 25 50 180
Total solids 93.0 0.14 94.7 0.77 95.0 0.49 94.50 0.56
Moisture 7.00 56 5.3 0.28 5.00 0.56 5.50 0.21
Total sugars 37.59 1.42 59.15 2.22 37.83 1.25 44 1.27
Total protein 3.89 0.28 4.07 0.51 5.63 0.40 6.15 0.52
Crude ber 25.78 1.1 23.29 2.19 21.14 1.59 21.30 1.48
Fat 3.46 0.45 3.86 0.31 5.76 0.38 7.8 0.42
size. The nitrogen source can play an important role as nutrient.
Moreover, affecting the pH changes in the substrate during the
fermentation. Moisture content did not showdifferences between
eachparticle size distribution. This physicochemical compositionis
in good agreement with other values found in the literature for this
material [16]. Grigelmo-Miguel and Martn-Bellose [17] reported
similar values of lipids using oranges as raw material and Nassar
et al. [18] showed similar values of fat in the chemical composi-
tion of oranges peel. Only few reports have been published on the
physicochemical composition of LPP. This characterization showed
that the LPP is a good prospect that could be used as carbon source
for SFF.
3.2. Microorganismselection for SSF
Growth of the fungal strains (Table 1) on the particle size blend
of LPP (Fig. 2A) was performed for the selection of microorganism
with the higher adaption. A. niger Aa-20 and GH
1
had a com-
plete capacity invasion in 48h with a maximum specic growth
rate (
max
) of 0.068 and 0.0631/h, respectively. Radial growths
were 0.098 and 0.095cm/h correspondingly, while the GS and PSS
strains invaded 18.5% of total Petri dishes at 56h. A. niger Aa-20
was selected for the SSF experiment in the column-tray bioreactor.
Robledo et al. [19] reported higher growth rate for GH
1
and PSH
on pomegranate husk (0.04 and 0.041cm/h, respectively). Trevi no-
Cueto et al. [20] reported a rate of invasion of 0.015 and 0.019cm/h
using A. niger Aa-20 on Larrea tridentate Cov.
3.3. Particle size selection for SSF
Theselectionof anadequatesupport for performingSFFis essen-
tial, since the success of the process depends on it. Inter-particular
spaces or porosity of substrate that depends onthe particle size dis-
tribution is one of the parameters that govern the mass and heat
transfer during the bioconversion of substrate. Small particles, or
particles withlargeat surfaces, tendtopacktogether closely, mak-
ing it difcult to aerate the substrate mass. If the microorganism
can penetrate into the particle this increases the directly accessible
substrate and decreases the distances over which diffusion needs
to occur. In this case the optimal particle size will be inuenced
by the depth of penetration. The optimal particle size often repre-
sents a compromise between the accessibility of nutrients and the
availability of oxygen. After to selected the microorganismA. niger
Aa-20, were performed the kinetics of invasion capacity for the
selection the better particle size distribution (Fig. 2B). The highest
specic growth rate (
max
) was 0.0991/h for a particle size dis-
tribution of 2.00.7mm (mesh 25) this behavior probably can be
assumed to the nutritional composition, and maybe there is more
specic area, porosityandaerationconditions. Moreover, inaerobic
fermentations, oxygen transfer to the fungus is an important phe-
nomenon to sustain microbial growth. Aerobic growth takes place
in a thin layer near the gasliquid interface, while in deeper regions
anaerobic growth and anaerobic conversions take place [21].
According to Tao et al. [22], reported that the maximumenzyme
productivity was obtained from 400m sized particles and was
lower with bigger (>0.9mm) and smaller particles (0.076mm) and
concluded that with signicantly smaller particles, the specic sur-
face area was greater but the porosity was less for lamentous
fungus attack that could not penetrate deep into the pores and
hence into the substrate particles. Larger particles provide bet-
ter aeration/respiration opportunities but provide lesser surface
area. The quantities of total sugar maybe also affect the growth
of microorganismas a relation of carbohydrates in the medium. At
particle size distribution of 0.30.17mm (mesh 180) the growth
rate was of 0.0551/h, probably the oxygen transportation are
Fig. 2. Growth rate on LPP: (A) at different types of microorganism: () GH1; ()
GH2; () GS; ( ) PSH; ( ) Aa-20; ( ) EH3; () EH2; () PSS. (B) A. niger Aa-20
growth over different particle size distribution: mesh () 10; ( ) 25; () 50; ()
80.
94 H.A. Ruiz et al. / Biochemical Engineering Journal 65 (2012) 9095
decient and in the smaller particles, the specic surface area was
greater but probablytheporositywas less. EachLPPfractionhas dif-
ferent properties that can affect the SSF process. Different authors
have studied the effect of particle size on growth and product for-
mation. RecentlyMembrilloet al. [6] showedthat geometrical ratio,
shape and size of sugar cane bagasse bers have a strong inuence
in packing density with an impact in the production of extracellu-
lar enzymes, growth rates and composition changes in substrate.
Bari et al. [5] used oil palm empty fruit bunches as substrate and
reported that the citric production increased with the decrease
of particle size from 3 to 0.25mm, obtained the maximum citric
production at 0.5mmof particle size.
3.4. Solid-state fermentation in the column-tray bioreactor
3.4.1. Biomass production in column-tray bioreactor
Biomass production prole for A. niger Aa-20 on LPP particle
size distribution of 2.00.7mm in function of the glucosamine
content that is the index parameter of the cell growth. The high-
est glucosamine content is obtained at 60h, correspondent to
7.55mg glucosamine/g LPP and it is remarkable that at the end
of the culture, biomass reached a value of 8.017mg glucosamine/g
LPP at 96h. The data adjustment to logistic equation with a high
correlation coefcient R
2
=0.997; R
2
adj
= 0.996, thus allowed to
determined specic growth rate of 0.1271/h and showing that
the model was adequate for this process. As part of this analysis,
it is shown that, for logistic growth kinetics, the time at which the
biomass reaches 94.17% of its maximum possible value is a good
estimate of the optimumharvesting time for maximizing produc-
tivity.
Membrillo et al. [6] reported similar amount of glucosamine at
the endof fermentationandthe specic growthrates values of 0.05,
0.049 and 0.0431/h for particles of 0.92, 1.68 and 2.9mm, respec-
tively. Daz-Godnez et al. [23] reported specic growth rate of
0.471/h, using sucrose as carbon source and polyurethane foamas
the solid support and A. niger C28B25 as microorganism.
On the other hand, the carbohydrate is an important parameter
for growth of microorganism. The quantity of total sugars before
fermentationwas 70.65mg of total sugar/100mg of LPP, decreasing
to 37.02mg of total sugar/100mg de pomace, this represent about
of 50% of the initial total sugars. Solis-Pereyra et al. [24] used high
initial glucose concentration of 100, 250, 350 and 450g/L for pecti-
nases production in SSF and reported that the maximum amount
of glucose was consumed and less than 3% of the initial glucose
remained unutilized after 24h of fermentation.
3.4.2. Enzyme production and kinetic parameters
Product formation was related to the growth by a modied
LuedekingPiret equation (Fig. 3). A reasonably good correlation
R
2
=0.949 was obtained. This result assumed that the rate of prod-
uct formation is related to the rate of growth. According to Aguilar
et al. [15], this kind of behavior showed that the formation of pecti-
nase is in the stationary phase of the culture process. According
to Paul and Thomas [25], the growth and metabolite produc-
tion from lamentous fungi are associated with complex and not
well-understood processes as the multicellular structure of the
mycelium, the morphological heterogeneity and the heterogeneity
in physiology and differentiation along the length of the hyphae
and during fermentation process. In a recent work, Martnez-
Trujillo et al. [26] reported the pectinase production using the
LuedekingPiret and founded that the exopectinases are produced
mainly during the growth phase where they release degradation
products fromcarbonsource, whichserve as inducers of endopecti-
nases that are produced at the end of this phase.
Table 3
Enzyme activity at different concentrations of substrate.
Substrate concentration (g/L) Enzyme activity (U/L)
0.4 1232.42
0.8 2181.23
1.6 863.1
3.2 991.65
SSF enzymatic extract was produced in the presence of the
inducer (pectin) fromLPP and evaluated at different substrate con-
centrations (Table 3). At 0.4g/L the highest production was 1232.
42U/L with 36h being stable until 60h when start to decrease
almost (238.3U/L), at 0.8g/L the highest production were at 40 and
60hwithvalues of 2146.54and2181.23U/L, respectively. However
at 1.6g/L pectinase activity were at earlier times observed (24h)
but with lower production (863.1U/L), this decrement was similar
at 3.2g/L with a higher value at 48h of 991.65U/L, which can be
assumed to a possible inhibition for product formation caused for
higher concentration of substrate.
These results are in agreement with the data reported for pecti-
nase activities. In a recent work Zeni et al. [27] reported an activity
of polygalacturonases above 3000U/L. Martos et al. [28] usedpectin
agar as substrate in submerged fermentation for polygalacturonase
enzyme by A. niger, the activity reported was 1032U/L. According
to several works, the pectinase productionhas beenreportedindif-
ferent types of bioreactors (i.e. stirred tank, airlift, column) [29,30].
Panda and Naidu [31] reported the pectinase production using a
batch stirred tank bioreactor and the maximum production was
1.313U of polygalacturonase. Huerta et al. [32] reported a pecti-
nase specic activity of 790U/mg of protein using a packed bed
bioreactor with A. niger CH
4
.
The bioreactor proposed in this work has advantages, the forced
aeration allows better control of environmental conditions in the
bed, due to the ability to manipulate the temperature and owrate
of the process air. Therefore the bioreactor should be operated so as
to minimize drying of the bed, because drying can eventually lead
to the moisture content in the bed reaching values which restrict
the growth of the microorganism. Smits et al. [33] modeled the
diffusion of water vapor in the void spaces of the bed. When it
was assumed that the air surrounding the tray was maintained at
a high humidity, then the combination of metabolic water produc-
tion with the relatively slow water vapor diffusion meant that the
predicted water content of the substrate remained above the initial
Fig. 3. Correlation between biomass growth and pectinase activity using the
LuedekingPiret model.
H.A. Ruiz et al. / Biochemical Engineering Journal 65 (2012) 9095 95
value. Under such conditions there will be no danger of the growth
rate being limited by lowwater activities of the solid substrate. For
that reason, the column-tray bioreactor represents a simple and
excellent technology for SSF.
In respect to, kinetic parameters, the pectinase activity
showed a typical MichaelisMenten prole. Kinetic parame-
ters of pectinase were determined as K
M
=0.155mol/L and
V
max
=38.84mol/(L/min), respectively. In this case the graphic
(data not showed) was linear with a correlation coefcient (R
2
) of
0. 996. Showing a higher afnity between enzyme and substrate.
4. Conclusions
In the present study, a promising solid-state fermentation pro-
cess for pectinase production has been performed in laboratory
scale. Lemon peel pomace is an attractive agro-industrial residues
and an alternative for the production of high levels of pectinolytic
enzymes, taking into account the adaptation of microorganism
and the signicant effect of particle size. The SSF process allowed
obtained high levels of fungal biomass and enzyme production in
SSF column-tray bioreactor.
Acknowledgments
The authors H.A. Ruiz and R.M. Rodrguez-Jasso thank to Mex-
ican Science and Technology Council (CONACYT, Mexico) for PhD
fellowship support (CONACYT grant number: 213592/308679 and
206607/230415, respectively). This work was supported in part
by the Food Research Department, Universidad Autnoma de
Coahuila, Mxico.
References
[1] R.S. Jayani, S. Saxena, S.R. Gupta, Microbial pectinolytic enzymes: a review,
Process Biochem. 40 (2005) 29312944.
[2] H.A. Ruz-Leza, Bioprocess development for pectinase production in solid-state
fermentation using lemon peel pomace (in Spanish), Undergraduate Thesis,
Food Research Department, School of Chemistry, Universidad Autnoma de
Coahuila, Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico, 2004.
[3] A. Figueroa-Montero, T. Esparza-Isunza, G. Saucedo-Casta neda, S. Huerta-
Ochoa, M. Gutirrez-Rojas, E. Favela-Torres, Improvement of heat removal in
solid-state fermentation tray bioreactors by forces air convection, J. Chem.
Technol. Biotechnol. 86 (2011) 13211331.
[4] R.M. Rodrguez-Jasso, Extraction and characterization of mexican lemon pectin
by an alternative clean methodology (in Spanish), Undergraduate Thesis,
Food Research Department, School of Chemistry, Universidad Autnoma de
Coahuila, Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico, 2003.
[5] M.N. Bari, M.Z. Alam, S.A. Muyibi, P. Jamal, A.A. Mamun, Effects of particle size
on production of citric acid fromoil palmempty fruit bunches as newsubstrate
by wild Aspergillus niger, J. Appl. Sci. 10 (2010) 26482652.
[6] I. Membrillo, C. Snchez, M. Meneses, E. Favela, O. Loera, Particle geometry
affects differentially substrate composition and enzyme proles by Pleuro-
tus ostreatus growing in sugar cane bagasse, Bioresour. Technol. 102 (2011)
15811586.
[7] I. Iliuta, M.C. Iliuta, F. Larachi, Hydrodynamics modeling of bioclogging in waste
gas treating trickle-bed bioreactors, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44 (2005) 50445052.
[8] H.A. Ruz-Leza, R.M. Rodrguez-Jasso, R. Rodrguez-Herrera, J.C. Contreras-
Esquivel, C.N. Aguilar, Bio-reactors design for solid state fermentation (in
Spanish), Rev. Mex. Ing. Qum. 6 (2007) 3340.
[9] AOAC. Ofcial methods of analysis of AOAC international, 16th ed., Association
of Ofcial Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, 1997.
[10] M. Cruz-Hernandez, J.C. Contreras-Esquivel, F. Lara, R.R. Rodriguez, C.N. Aguilar,
Isolation and evaluation of tannin-degrading fungal strains fromthe Mexican
desert, Z. Naturforsch. C. 60 (2005) 844848.
[11] R.M. Rodriguez-Jasso, S.I. Mussatto, L. Pastrana, C.N. Aguilar, J.A. Teixeira,
Fucoidan-degrading fungal strains: screening, morphometric evaluation, and
inuence of medium composition, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 162 (2010)
21772188.
[12] D.A. Mitchell, O.F.V. Meien, N. Krieger, F.D.H. Dalsenter, A review of recent
developments in modeling of microbial growth kinetics and intraparticle phe-
nomena in solid-state fermentation, Biochem. Eng. J. 17 (2004) 1526.
[13] W. Chen, R.Y.Y. Chiou, A modied chemical procedure for rapid determination
of glucosamine and its application for estimation of mold growth in peanut
kernels and koji, J. Agric. Food Chem. 47 (1999) 19992004.
[14] C.T. Scotti, C. Veroignan, G. Feron, A. Durand, Glucosamine measurement as
indirect method for biomass estimation of Cunninghamella elagans grown in
solid state cultivation conditions, Biochem. Eng. J. 7 (2000) 15.
[15] C.N. Aguilar, C. Augur, E. Favela-Torres, G. Viniegra-Gonzlez, Production of
tannase by Aspergillus niger Aa-20 in submerged and solid-state fermentation:
inuence of glucose and tannic acid, J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26 (2001)
296302.
[16] F. Figuerola, M.L. Hurtado, A.M. Estvez, I. Chiffelle, F. Asenjo, Fibre concen-
trates from apple pomace and citrus peel as potential bre sources for food
enrichment, Food Chem. 91 (2005) 395401.
[17] N. Grigelmo-Miguel, O. Martn-Belloso, Characterization of dietary ber from
orange juice extraction, Food Res. Int. 31 (1999) (1999) 355361.
[18] A.G. Nassar, A.A. AbdE.L-Hamied, E.A. El-Naggar, Effect of citrus by-products
our incorporation on chemical, rheological and organolepic characteristics of
biscuits, World J. Agric. Sci. 4 (2008) 612616.
[19] A. Robledo, A. Aguilera-Carb, R. Rodriguez, J.L. Martinez, Y. Garza, C.N.
Aguilar, Ellagic acid production by Aspergillus niger in solid state fermen-
tation of pomegranate residues, J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 35 (2008)
507513.
[20] B. Trevi no-Cueto, M. Luis, J.C. Contreras-Esquivel, R. Rodrguez, A. Aguilera, C.N.
Aguilar, Gallic acid and tannase accumulation during fungal solid-state culture
of a tannin-rich desert plant (Larrea tridentate Cov.), Bioresour. Technol. 98
(2007) 721724.
[21] J. Oostra, E.P. le Comte, J.C. Van den Huevel, J. Tramper, A. Rinzema, Intra-
particle oxygen diffusion limitation in solid-state fermentation, Biotechnol.
Bioeng. 75 (2001) 1324.
[22] S. Tao, L. Peng, L. Beihui, L. Deming, L. Zouhu, Solid state fermentation of rice
chaff for fribrinolytic enzyme production by Fusarium Oxysporum, Biotechnol.
Lett. 19 (1997) 465467.
[23] G. Daz-Godnez, J. Soriano-Santos, C. Augur, G. Viniegra-Gonzlez, Exopecti-
nases producedby Aspergillus niger in solid-state andsubmergedfermentation:
a comparative study, J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26 (2001) 271275.
[24] S. Solis- Pereyra, E. Favela-Torres, M. Gutirrez-Rojas, S. Roussos, G. Saucedo-
Casta neda, P. Gunasekaran, G. Viniegra-Gonzlez, Production of pectinase by
Aspergillus niger in solid-state fermentation at high initial glucose concentra-
tions, World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 12 (1996) 257260.
[25] G.C. Paul, C.R. Thomas, A structured model for hyphal differentiation and peni-
cillin production using Penicilliumchrysogenum, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 51 (1996)
558572.
[26] A. Martnez-Trujillo, L. Arregun-Rangel, M. Garca-Rivero, G. Aguilar-Osorio,
Use of fruit residues for pectinase production by Aspergillus avipes FP-500 and
Aspergillus terreus FP-370, Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 53 (2011) 202209.
[27] J. Zeni, K. Cence, C.E. Grando, L. Tiggermann, R. Colet, L. Lerin, R.L. Cansian,
G. Toniazzo, D. Oliveira, E. Valduga, Screening of pectinase-producing microor-
ganismwith polygalacturonase activity, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 163 (2011)
383392.
[28] M.A. Martos, F.M. Vazquez, F.O. Benassi, R.A. Hours, Production of pectinase
by A. niger: inuence of fermentation conditions, Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 52
(2009) 567572.
[29] R.C. Fontana, T.A. Polidoro, M.M. da Silveira, Comparison of stirred tank and
airlift bioreactors inthe productionof polygalacturonases by Aspergillus oryzae,
Bioresour. Technol. 100 (2009) 44934498.
[30] G.A. Linde, G. Magagnin, J.A.V. Costa, T.E. Bertolin, N.B. Colauto, Columnbioreac-
tor use for optimization of pectinase production in solid substrate cultivation,
Braz. J. Microbiol. 38 (2007) 557562.
[31] T. Panda, G.S.N. Naidu, Rotating simplex method of optimization of physical
parameters for higher production of extracellular pectinase in bioreactor, Bio-
process. Eng. 23 (2000) 4749.
[32] S. Huerta, E. Favela, R. Lpez-Ulibarri, A. Fonseca, G. Viniegra-Gonzlez, M.
Gutirrez-Rojas, Absorbed substrate fermentation for pectinase production
with Aspergillus niger, Biotechnol. Tech. 8 (1994) 837842.
[33] J.P. Smits, H.M.V. Sonsbeek, J. Tramper, W. Knol, W. Geelhoed, M. Peeters, A.
Rinzema, Modelling fungal solid-state fermentation: the role of inactivation
kinetics, Bioprocess Eng. 20 (1999) 391404.