0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
27 vues6 pages
Competitive success can not be achieved by change but through sustained efforts. Managers need to find viable solutions to maintain competitive position held. Managers try to develop competitive skills based on practical marketing concepts.
Competitive success can not be achieved by change but through sustained efforts. Managers need to find viable solutions to maintain competitive position held. Managers try to develop competitive skills based on practical marketing concepts.
Competitive success can not be achieved by change but through sustained efforts. Managers need to find viable solutions to maintain competitive position held. Managers try to develop competitive skills based on practical marketing concepts.
International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences
November 2012, Vol. 1, No. 6
ISSN: 2226-3624
36
Competitive Success: Ambition or Necessity?
Anca Francisca CRUCERU Lecturer, PhD, Faculty of Marketing, Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Email: ancacruceru1@gmail.com
Abstract
Any company multinational that operates in a competitive market will ask a series of questions to find solutions to achieve profitable business. From a marketing perspective, competitive success can not be achieved by change but through sustained efforts, consistent towards the adoption and implementation of competitive strategies capable of leading the company to achieve a better competitive position on the relevant market. Marketing strategy is built from a careful analysis capabilities available company so that they can be given a unique value target consumers and at the same time, to achieve differentiation from other competitor offer.
In a global economy dominated by strong competition and rapid changes in consumer behavior towards mentality and consumption of consumer goods and services, managers need to find viable solutions to maintain competitive position held. This is not possible without a market and product awareness (Kotler, 1994), without clearly defined strategic direction to show how an organization uses strategy to adopt and/or changing environmental aspects more favorable alignment (Manu and Sriram, 1996). Based on targeting and knowledge of customer needs, managers try to develop competitive skills based on practical marketing concepts such as marked segmentation, positioning, marketing strategy, marketing mix, etc.
According to the authors W. J. Keegan, J. H. Davidson and E. A. Brill (2003), strategic focus includes the following efforts by the organization:
(1) to be profitable; to achieve an appropriate balance between business needs expressed in terms of profit and consumer needs for a certain value; (2) to be offensive; behave proactively, to shape the market, prompting other competitors to follow; (3) to integrate marketing vision at all hierarchical levels; (4) to adopt a strategy; it requires careful consideration of the competition; (5) to effectively execute strategy with daily deployment plan based on deadlines.
Regarding marketing strategy, its purpose it well known by managers, namely placing the organization in a favorable competitive position and, at the same time, lead to value creation and competitive advantage. When developing a competitive advantage, the focus will be on International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences November 2012, Vol. 1, No. 6 ISSN: 2226-3624
37
two essential factors: it must always be based on something of value to the customer and not price alone and it must be sustainable (Brooksbank, 1994).
Competitive Positioning
Competitive positioning is not about the organization aims to provide marked through marketing strategy but what they charge consumers vis--vis this offer. Clear differentiation by specific marketing allows easier identification of this offer by consumers. It is considered that there are two steps for obtaining the competitive position (Darling, 2001):
(1) establishing the initial market offering in the minds of consumers and (2) differentiating the market offering from competitors in the minds of consumers.
Based on Porter (1985), Prahalad and Hamel (1990), Hunt and Morgan (1995), Slaters and Narver (1995), managers tried to seek out market based sources of advantage through differentiation, cost reduction or focus, and finally to find advantage through an internal analysis. Capabilities of the organization must be determined through a detailed comparative analysis of what the organization has compared to other direct competitors. Once known strengths of the competitors, managers will focus on developing the ability to learn faster than their competitors and to transform this into a competitive advantage (Dickson, 1992). This competitive advantage should be seen as a superior marketplace position based on providing customer value and/or the achievment of lower relative costs, which results in market share dominance and business performance (Hunt and Morgan, 1995; Day and Wensley, 1988). But the question which troubled many managers of this powerful organization in the European market will be on the identification of core competencies.
Core Competencies
Core competencies are the unique ability of the company can not be copied by direct competitors and giving them a competitive advantage in creating and providing value target consumers.
Namely core capabilities or distinctive competencies this concept was developed by C. K. Prahalad and G. Hamel in a series of articles and in the book Competing for the Future (1994), they stressed that these capabilities must be competitively unique.
Also, this capabilities will change over time and it really is essential to achieve this by repeated assessments by managers due to changes in the environmental factors.
According to P. Kotler and Keller (2009) a core competency has three characteristics: (1) it is a source of competitive advantage in that it makes a significant contribution to perceived customer benefit; (2) it has applications in a wide variety of markets; (3) it is difficult for competitors to imitate. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences November 2012, Vol. 1, No. 6 ISSN: 2226-3624
38
Between choosing these core competencies and implemented marketing strategy should be a direct link because the strong competitive strategies are considering offer existing competitors on the relevant market but also in the implementation of marketing in the company.
The authors Tvede and Ohnemus (2001) an approach to marketing strategies based on two distinct situations, positive and negative, on action than can be taken and existing marketing skills.
Table 1. Criteria for selection of competitive marketing strategies
Competitor with a better offer Weaker competitor offer
Competitor with a better marketing improving supply differentation developing a stronger network implementation strategies faster introduction of products on the market improving the image intensify efforts to sell increased promotional efforts cooperation compete at the same level developing a stronger network implementation strategies
Weaker competitor marketing improving supply cooperation stronger implementation strategies compete at the same lavel faster introduction of products on the market compete at the same level Sursa: Lars Tvede, Peter Ohnemus, Marketing Strategies For The New Economy, The Wiley&Sons Ltd., England, 2001, p.142
These competitive strategies can be addressed if the analysis of the competitive situation of the company is depending on the position of a competitors. But the difficulty of identifying direct competitor and, especially supply and marketing analysis developed by the company can be a serious impediment to the correct choice of these strategies according to two criteria presented. These competitive strategies are only guiding framework, choosing the best strategic choice is an example of marketing skill and craftsmanship of those who use them (Cruceru, 2000). However, managers of these company are interested to analyse, identify and develop marketing skills necessary to achieve competitive success. How strategic orientation of the company is considering two components, customers and competitors, it is obvious that the starting point is the marketing analysis. According to Radulescu (2012) an important step in International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences November 2012, Vol. 1, No. 6 ISSN: 2226-3624
39
the analysis is to determine the estimated market, in other words the size of the market in which the company proposes to achieve over a period of time and the potential marked, defined as the side of the maximum possible achievable. It can be concluded that the existence of marketing specialists company is imperative to make these decisions and to have a goal of competitive success. But alone, marketers will not do this, because it requires management and open to the strategic orientation. Therefore, organizational capabilities can be classified into managerial, marketing, and technical capabilities (Spanos and Lioukas, 2001). Marketing capabilities includes different sets of marketing-related capabilities such as market research tools, strategic marketing management, marketing mix policies, marketing complementarities (Verona, 1999).
Conclusion
EU legislation states marked differences which can generate distortions of competition and obstacles to the proper functioning of the internal market. These legislative differences lead to difficulties when engaged transboundary marketing activities, advertising campaigns and sales promotion. (Radulescu, Radulescu, Cetina, 2009)
Under these conditions, competitive success is more a necessity than an ambition of companies, is an aim in itself when we consider the work done by them. The specific marketing actions can be achieved management objectives proposed and developed these unique capabilities decisive in the competition. The marketing voice should be heard in the executives board room and a greater influence should be guaranteed for marketing since marketing performance is one of the best roots to achieve a competitive advantage that will enable an organization to attract and retain customers paying satisfactory prices (Mamoun N. Akroush, 2012).
What must be understood in terms of adopting and implementing competitive marketing strategies is that they will be build and will determine the competitive advantage held by the company on the relevant market. Basically, the more dynamic competitive environment is especially required to treat very seriously the implementation of the marketing strategy. Build unique competencies of the organization is, on the other hand, an essential starting point in this regard as it will provide the unique value to consumers. The company will establish a strong competitive background able to enable it achieve marketing objectives and occupying a strong position on the relevant market.
References
Akroush, Mamoun N. (2012), An empirical model of marketing strategy and shareholder value: A value-based marketing perspective, Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness, Vol. 22, Iss: 1, pp. 48-89.
Brooksbank, Roger (1994), The Anatomy of Marketing Positioning Strategy, Marketing Intelligence&Planning, Vol. 12, No. 4, MCB University Press Limited, pp. 10-14. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences November 2012, Vol. 1, No. 6 ISSN: 2226-3624
40
Cruceru, Anca Francisca (2006), Marketing. Strategii concureniale, Uranus, Bucharest.
Darling, John R. (2001), Successful competitive positioning: the key for entry into the European consumer marked, European Business Review, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 209-220.
Day, G. S. and Wensley, R. (1988), Assessing advantage; a framework for diagnosing competitive superiority, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52, April, pp. 1-20.
Dickson, P.R. (1992), Towards a general theory of competitive rationality, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56, January, pp. 69-83.
Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C.K. (1990), The core competence of the corporation, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68, No. 3, May-June, pp. 79-81.
Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C.K. (1994), Competing for the Future, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Hunt, S. D. and Morgan, R. M. (1995), The comparative advantage theory of competition, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 59, April, pp. 1-15.
Keegan, W. J.; Davidson, J.H. and Brill, Elyse Arno, (2003), Offensive Marketing: An Action Guide to Gaining Competitive Advantage, Routledge.
Kotler, P. (1994), Marketing Management. Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control, 8th Edition, Prentice Hall.
Kotler, P. and Keller, K.L. (2009), Marketing Management, 13th edition, Pearson Prentice Hall.
Manu, F.A. and Sriram V. (1996), Innovation, marketing strategy, environment and performance, Journal of Business Research, Vol.35, pp.79.
Porter, M.E. (1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, MacMillan, New York.
Radulescu, V. (2012), The Role of Market Analysis in Developing Eifficient marketing Audit, International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, September, Vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 222-229.
Radulescu, V.; Radulescu D. and Cetina I. (2009). Legal and ethical principles in establishing the prices of the goods and services, Revista Metalurgia International, Nr. 3/2009, ISSN 1582-2214, pp. 45-47.
International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences November 2012, Vol. 1, No. 6 ISSN: 2226-3624
41
Slater, S. F. and Narver, J. C. (1995), Market orientation and the learning organization Journal of Marketing, Vol. 59, pp. 63-74.
Spanos, Y.E. and Lioukas, S. 92001), An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: contrasting Porters competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, No. 10, pp. 907-34.
Tvede, Lars and Ohnemus, Peter (2001), Marketing Strategies for the New Economy, John Wiley&Sons Ltd., England, pp. 142.
Verona, G. (1999), A resource-based view of product development, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 132-42.