Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Faculty of Food Engineering, Technology Institute, Federal University of Par (UFPA), CEP: 66075-110, Belm, PA, Brazil
a b s t r a c t
The objective of this study was to evaluate the hygroscopic behavior of Nanico banana our at three ripening
stages (29
C. The BET monolayer procedure was used for the desorption analysis. The Halsey, Henderson,
Oswin, Smith, BET and GAB models were tted to the sorption data. All ours exhibited type II isotherms that were
almost superimposed, indicating that the ripening stage of the banana did not alter the hygroscopic behavior of
the products. According to the adsorption isotherms, the our has microbiological stability (a
w
<0.6) at moisture
contents below 13g H
2
O/100g dry base (d.b.). The monolayer moisture content indicated that the drying process of
the Nanico banana should not proceed to moisture content lower than 7.10g H
2
O/100g d.b. to avoid unnecessary
power consumption. A type-H3 hysteresis between the adsorption and desorption isotherms of our was observed.
The Oswin, Smith and GAB models provided the best t for the our adsorption and desorption data.
2013 The Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Musa ssp.; Isotherms; Sorption; Hygroscopicity; Modeling
1. Introduction
The banana is one of the most highly consumed fruits in the
world witha productionof 102 milliontons in2010 (FAO, 2012).
With a high degree of productivity that is characterized with
an increased number of fruit per bunch with long fruit, the
Nanico banana has gained prominence. Due to its promis-
ing genetic potential, this variety is considered to have several
economic advantages compared with other cultivars, such as
the genotypes fromthe groups AAAA, AAB and AAAB (Donato
et al., 2006). These characteristics favor both the fresh con-
sumption and the industrialization of this variety.
Green or semi-mature banana our is an interesting alter-
native use of the fruit (Lima et al., 2000). Moisture removed
during the processing of the our prevents the growth and
reproduction of spoilage micro-organisms, minimizing unde-
sirable reactions and enabling the product to be stored at
roomtemperature. Drying substantially reduces the mass and
volume of the product, minimizing the packaging, transport
Corresponding author at: Faculty of Food Engineering, Federal University of Par (UFPA) Rua Augusto Crrea, 01, P.O. Box 479, Postal
Code: 66075-110, Belm, PA, Brazil. Tel.: +55 91 3201 8055; fax: +55 91 3201 7626.
E-mail addresses: rspena@ufpa.br, rspena70@hotmail.com(R.S. Pena).
Received13 February2013; Receivedinrevisedform10 July 2013; Accepted1 August 2013
and storage costs (Raghavan and Orsat, 2007; Mujumdar, 1995;
Okos et al., 1992).
Drying fruit is one of the oldest preservation techniques
and is based on the reduction of water activity (a
w
). Water
is one of the most important components of food, affecting
the physical nature and the product properties in a complex
manner. The interactions between the water molecules and
the medium can affect the physical structure and the chem-
ical composition of various solutes, including polymers and
colloids, or of dispersed particles (Park et al., 2001).
For dried goods, the moisture adsorption and desorption
isotherms can provide important information for multiple
issues, such as the optimal drying and storage conditions,
which are necessary to determine the shelf life and the
type of packaging to be used (Assunc o and Pena, 2007).
Starchy foods show mostly Langmuir-like tipe II isotherms,
while protein-rich foods display mostly solution-like type
II isotherm, and foods rich in soluble solids present type
III isotherms (Yanniotis and Blahovec, 2009). There are
0960-3085/$ see front matter 2013 The Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2013.08.004
74 food and bioproducts processing 9 2 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 7379
numerous empirical and semi-empirical mathematical mod-
els used in the prediction of food moisture sorption isotherms
(Peng et al., 2007). Sorptionisotherms for multiple starchours
can be found in the literature (Bezerra et al., 2013; Chist et al.,
2012; Cova et al., 2010; Kulchanet al., 2010; Perdomoet al., 2009;
Mishra and Rai, 2006).
The importance of the water sorption isotherms to the
low moisture food industry, the nutritional and technological
properties of Nanico banana promoting its industrialization
as our and the lack of data on the hygroscopic behavior of
this variety of banana motivated this research, which aimed
to evaluate the hygroscopic behavior of Nanico banana our
obtainedfromthe fruit at three ripening stages using moisture
absorption and desorption isotherms at 25
C.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Raw material
The bananas of the Nanico variety (Musa ssp. AAA) used
in this research were acquired fromthe supply centers in the
state of Par (CEASA-PA), Belm, Par, Brazil (latitude 01
27
21
S and longitude 48
30
16
Brix).
2.2. Proximate composition of the banana our
The bananas were selected, washed in running water and
immersed in chlorinated water (100mg/L) for 10min. The
fruit were subsequently peeled and cut into 4mm-thick slices,
followed by bleaching by immersion into a 1% (w/v) citric
acid solution for 15min. Next, the slices were placed on an
absorbent paper to drain the excess solution and dried in
a xed-bed dryer with air temperature at 60
C and airow
velocities of 1.5m/s until a constant weight was reached. The
product was milled in a hammer mill and subjected to mois-
ture analysis in a forced-air oven at 105
C for 24h to
ensure a
w
<0.1 in all samples. The samples were then placed
in a desiccator with water and the systemmaintained at 25
C
(1
C by nonlinear
regression using the STATISTICA Kernel Release 7.1 software
(StatSoft Inc., 2006, Tulsa, OK, USA). The LevenbergMarquardt
algorithmwas used with a convergence criterion of 10
6
. The
coefcient of determination (R
2
) (Eq. (2)) and the mean rela-
tive deviation modulus (P) (Eq. (3)) were used to compare the
t precision of the models. The P values lower than 10% were
Table 1 Mathematical models used to t the sorption isotherms of banana our.
Models Mathematical equations Number of parameters
Halsey (Chirife and Iglesias, 1978) m =
_
a
ln aw
1/b
2
Henderson (Chirife and Iglesias, 1978) m =
_
ln(1aw)
a
1/b
2
Oswin (Chirife and Iglesias, 1978) m = a
_
aw
1aw
b
2
Smith (Chirife and Iglesias, 1978) m = a b ln(1 a
w
) 2
BET (Figueira et al., 2004) m =
mocaw
1aw
_
1(n+1)a
n
w
+na
n+1
w
1(1c)awca
n+1
w
_
3
GAB (Maroulis et al., 1988) m =
mockaw
[(1kaw)(1+(c1)kaw)]
3
m=moisture content (g/100g d.b.); a
w
=water activity; a, b, m
o
, k and c terms are the parameters to be estimated by tting.
food and bioproducts processing 9 2 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 7379 75
Table 2 Proximate composition of banana our in different ripening stages.
Parameters Ripening stage 1 Ripening stage 2 Ripening stage 3
Moisture (g/100g) 9.85 0.21
a
9.64 0.11
a
8.73 0.03
b
Ashes (g/100g) 3.16 0.05
a
3.26 0.04
a
3.15 0.09
a
Lipids (g/100g) 1.63 0.05
c
2.24 0.05
b
2.93 0.14
a
Proteins (N5.85) (g/100g) 4.89 0.21
b
5.74 0.21
a
5.25 0.21
a,b
Starch (g/100g) 70.07 1.85
a
63.89 2.67
b
52.65 1.14
c
Reducing sugars (g/100g) 2.05 0.08
c
2.95 0.12
b
4.43 0.15
a
Total sugars (g/100g) 2.88 0.03
c
5.99 0.11
b
10.0 0.14
a
Mean of triplicatestandard deviation. Mean values in the same rowfollowed by different superscript letters (a, b, c) are signicantly different
(p0.05 by Tukeys test).
adopted as an indicative of a good t for practical purposes
(Peng et al., 2007)
R
2
=
n
i=1
(m
i
m
pre,i
)
n
i=1
(m
i
m
exp,i
)
_
_
n
i=1
(m
i
m
pre,i
)
2
_
n
i=1
(m
i
m
exp,i
)
2
_
(2)
P =
100
n
n
i=1
m
exp
m
pre
m
exp
(3)
where m=moisture content (g H
2
O/100g d.b.), m
exp
and m
pre
are the experimental andpredictedmoisture contents, respec-
tively, and n=number of observations.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Proximate composition of the banana our
The major constituent of Nanico banana our was starch
(52.6570.07%), regardless of ripening stage (Table 2). In a
comparison of the our constituents, statistically signicant
differences (p0.05) were observed in multiple components
withthe most signicant variations inthe starchandtotal sug-
ars values. The starch decreased and total sugars increased
with the ripening stage of the banana, as a result of starch
hydrolysis producing sucrose (non-reducing sugar) and the
subsequent sucrose hydrolysis producing glucose andfructose
(reducing sugars) (Cordenunsi and Lajolo, 1995). The reducing
sugars content of our also increased with the ripening stage
of the banana.
For the sample from ripening stage 1, the composition of
the banana our was consistent with the values found in the
Table 3 Moisture adsorption and desorption data of banana our in different ripening stages at 25
C.
Ripening stage 1 Ripening stage 2 Ripening stage 3
Adsorption Desorption Adsorption Desorption Adsorption Desorption
a
w
m a
w
m a
w
m a
w
m a
w
m a
w
m
0.08 4.69 0.94 44.94 0.08 3.87 0.92 38.73 0.05 4.40 0.91 35.35
0.12 5.31 0.89 29.58 0.14 5.19 0.92 36.36 0.08 5.11 0.88 31.79
0.15 6.07 0.86 27.19 0.16 5.72 0.90 33.53 0.10 5.80 0.86 29.06
0.18 6.49 0.83 23.37 0.19 6.22 0.87 30.29 0.14 6.51 0.83 24.89
0.25 7.53 0.78 21.17 0.21 6.71 0.85 26.06 0.17 7.05 0.80 23.07
0.30 8.30 0.75 20.07 0.27 7.47 0.83 24.17 0.19 7.38 0.77 21.37
0.35 8.84 0.72 19.23 0.31 8.14 0.80 22.60 0.23 7.86 0.74 20.37
0.39 9.38 0.69 18.36 0.35 9.08 0.78 21.14 0.26 8.25 0.68 18.43
0.43 9.79 0.66 17.19 0.39 9.43 0.74 19.52 0.29 8.58 0.63 17.00
0.49 10.88 0.64 16.54 0.42 9.92 0.71 18.87 0.33 8.91 0.57 15.69
0.53 11.99 0.59 15.11 0.47 10.72 0.67 17.94 0.37 9.27 0.53 14.77
0.58 13.11 0.56 14.48 0.52 11.96 0.64 16.92 0.40 9.76 0.49 13.90
0.63 14.36 0.52 13.79 0.56 12.87 0.58 15.64 0.44 10.66 0.45 13.11
0.66 15.05 0.47 12.85 0.61 13.88 0.54 14.86 0.48 11.70 0.40 11.96
0.69 16.21 0.42 11.52 0.64 14.92 0.48 13.50 0.52 12.19 0.35 11.39
0.74 18.79 0.36 10.66 0.68 15.76 0.44 12.53 0.57 13.20 0.30 10.79
0.79 21.17 0.32 9.91 0.74 18.53 0.40 11.61 0.62 14.82 0.27 9.85
0.83 23.15 0.28 9.08 0.78 20.28 0.34 10.70 0.66 15.82 0.23 8.94
0.87 26.80 0.25 8.27 0.81 22.02 0.29 9.49 0.68 16.48 0.19 8.21
0.90 31.12 0.17 6.87 0.84 24.58 0.26 8.31 0.73 18.18 0.17 7.32
0.94 44.94 0.10 5.36 0.86 26.48 0.20 6.59 0.76 19.83 0.12 6.11
0.92 38.33 0.17 5.64 0.81 23.34 0.10 5.48
0.12 4.59 0.84 25.51 0.05 4.10
0.06 2.95 0.88 30.33
0.90 33.27
0.91 35.50
a
w
, water activity (dimensionless); m, moisture content (g H
2
O/100g d.b.). All values are means of two measures (relative error less than 5%).
76 food and bioproducts processing 9 2 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 7379
literature for our of the same banana variety at the same
ripening stage. Menezes et al. (2011) reported values of 6.90%
moisture, 3.14% ash, 0.89% fat, 3.60% protein, 76.77% starch
and 1.81% reducing sugars. Mota et al. (2000) found 0.82%
lipid and 2.6% protein. Muyonga et al. (2001) reported starch
contents between 70.64%and 75.90%. Data regarding the com-
position of Nanico banana our in ripening stages 2 and 3
were not found in the literature.
3.2. Sorption isotherms of the banana our
Moisture adsorption and desorption data of Nanico banana
our at the three ripening stages (29
C.
are consistent with the type-H3 hysteresis loop according to
the IUPAC classication (Sing et al., 1985). Hysteresis can be
used as an index of the food quality. A decrease in the hys-
teresis loop or its complete absence has beenrelated to greater
product stability during storage (Caurie, 2007).
3.3. Modeling of sorption isotherms of the banana
our
The tting parameters of the mathematical models applied
to predict the behavior of the our adsorption and desorp-
tion isotherms are shown in Table 4. According to Gabas et
food and bioproducts processing 9 2 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 7379 77
Fig. 2 Sorption isotherms of banana our in different ripening stages at 25
C.
Isotherms Models Number of parameters Equation parameters R
2
P (%)
Ripening stage 1
Adsorption
Halsey 2 a=49.08; b=1.77 0.9971 3.1
Henderson 2 a=0.04; b=1.14 0.9454 18.2
Oswin 2 a=11.33; b=0.48 0.9916 6.5
Smith 2 a=2.80; b=12.67 0.9677 9.4
BET 3 m
o
=5.00; c =1.1210
6
; n=19.00 0.9632 10.1
GAB 3 m
o
=5.82; c =66.49; k =0.92 0.9896 7.0
Desorption
Halsey 2 a=102.47; b=1.96 0.9925 5.2
Henderson 2 a=0.03; b=1.28 0.0416 12.2
Oswin 2 a=12.82; b=0.43 0.9901 3.9
Smith 2 a=4.17; b=12.42 0.9682 5.7
BET 3 m
o
=6.00; c =1.0610
6
; n=15.00 0.9317 11.2
GAB 3 m
o
=6.84; c =71.18; k =0.89 0.9770 5.1
78 food and bioproducts processing 9 2 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 7379
Table 4 (Continued)
Isotherms Models Number of parameters Equation parameters R
2
P (%)
Ripening stage 2
Adsorption
Halsey 2 a=44.23; b=1.73 0.9967 4.8
Henderson 2 a=0.03; b=1.25 0.9614 13.1
Oswin 2 a=11.44; b=0.47 0.9967 3.5
Smith 2 a=3.05; b=12.25 0.9824 5.6
BET 3 m
o
=5.06; c =293.77; n=16.72 0.9753 9.4
GAB 3 m
o
=6.26; c =24.76; k =0.92 0.9952 4.0
Desorption
Halsey 2 a=92.42; b=1.93 0.9842 12.8
Henderson 2 a=0.02; b=1.34 0.9736 9.8
Oswin 2 a=12.99; b=0.43 0.9930 6.7
Smith 2 a=4.02; b=12.56 0.9833 9.5
BET 3 m
o
=5.93; c =43.24; n=13.15 0.9628 12.7
GAB 3 m
o
=7.71; c =16.54; k =0.86 0.9866 8.0
Ripening stage 3
Adsorption
Halsey 2 a=56.39; b=1.79 0.9991 2.4
Henderson 2 a=0.02; b=1.35 0.9574 16.2
Oswin 2 a=12.27; b=0.45 0.9931 7.0
Smith 2 a=3.86; b=12.16 0.9879 6.2
BET 3 m
o
=5.48; c =295.66; n=14.45 0.9877 7.2
GAB 3 m
o
=6.57; c =43.70; k =0.89 0.9986 2.2
Desorption
Halsey 2 a=112.82; b=1.97 0.9895 8.0
Henderson 2 a=0.01; b=1.59 0.9702 9.6
Oswin 2 a=13.89; b=0.40 0.9947 3.2
Smith 2 a=5.25; b=11.95 0.9863 7.4
BET 3 m
o
=6.63; c =56.22; n=10.38 0.9680 9.0
GAB 3 m
o
=8.21; c =24.90; k =0.84 0.9904 5.1
R
2
, coefcient of determination; P, mean relative deviation modulus.
al. (2007), the degree of tting to experimental data and the
physical meaning of the model should be used as criteria in
selecting the most appropriate sorption model for predicting
an isotherm. According to the coefcient of determination
values (R
2
>0.97) and the mean relative deviation modulus
(P<10%), the Oswin, Smith and GAB models provided the best
t to the our adsorption and desorption data. The efciency
of these models in the prediction of the moisture sorption
isotherms of the our at each ripening stage (29
Brix) can
be observed in Fig. 2. The Halsey model t the adsorption data
excellently, but the model was not satisfactory (P>10%) in t-
ting the data from the banana our desorption in ripening
stage 2.
With parameters of R
2
0.99 and P7.0 for all data relating
to adsorption and desorption processes and the biparametric
model characteristics that enable a mathematical solution by
linear regression, the Oswin model was determined to be the
most suitable model for predicting the Nanico banana our
moisture adsorption and desorption isotherms at 25
C for the
our samples at the three ripening stages (29
Brix).
4. Conclusions
The Nanico banana our isotherms at 25
Brix) at
25
C.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank FAPESPA (Fundac o de Amparo Pesquisa
do Estado do Par) for the nancial support.
References
Abdullah, N., Nawawi, A., Othman, I., 2000. Fungal spoilage of
starch-based foods in relation to its water activity (a
w
). J.
Stored Prod. Res. 36, 4754.
Aguirre-cruz, A., Alvarez-castillo, A., Castrejon-rosales, T.,
Caromna-garca, R., Bello-prez, L.A., 2010. Moisture
adsorption behavior of banana ours (Musa paradisiaca)
unmodied and modied by acid-treatment. Starch 62,
658666.
Al-muhtaseb, A.H., McMinn, W.A.M., Magee, T.R.A., 2004. Water
sorption isotherms of starch powders. Part 1: mathematical
description of experimental data. J. Food Eng. 61, 297307.
AOAC, 1997. Ofcial Methods of analysis of the Association of
Ofcial Analytical Chemists, 16th ed. AOAC, Washington.
Assunc o, A.B., Pena, R.S., 2007. Hygroscopic behavior of the dry
residue of pink shrimp. Cinc. Tecnol. Aliment. 27, 786793.
Bezerra, C.V., Amante, E.R., Oliveira, D.C., Rodrigues, A.M.C., Silva,
L.H.M., 2013. Green banana (Musa cavendishii) our obtained in
spouted bed effect of drying on physico-chemical, functional
and morphological characteristics of the starch. Ind. Crops
Prod. 41, 241249.
Brunauer, S., Emmet, P.H., Teller, E., 1938. Adsorption of gases in
multimolecular layers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60, 309319.
food and bioproducts processing 9 2 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 7379 79
Caurie, M., 2007. Hysteresis phenomenon in foods. Int. J. Food Sci.
Technol. 42, 4549.
Chirife, J., Iglesias, H.A., 1978. Equations for tting water sorption
isotherms of foods: Part 1 a review. J. Food Technol. 13,
159174.
Chist, R.C., Silva, P.A., Lopes, A.S., Pena, R.S., 2012. Sorption
isotherms of tapioca our. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 47,
870874.
Cordenunsi, B.R., Lajolo, F.M., 1995. Starch breakdown during
banana ripening: sucrose synthase and sucrose
phosphate-synthase. J. Agric. Food Chem. 43, 347351.
Cova, A., Sandoval, A.J., Balsamo, V., Mller, A.J., 2010. The effect
of hydrophobic modications on the adsorption isotherms of
cassava starch. Carbohydr. Polym. 81, 660667.
Donato, S.L.R., Silva, S.O., Lucca Filho, O.A., Lima, M.B.,
Domingues, H., Alves, J.S., 2006. Behavior of banana varieties
and hybrids (Musa spp.) in two production cycle in the
southwest of Bahia state. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 28, 139144.
FAO, 2012. Faostat, http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.
aspx? PageID=567#ancor (Accessed 9 June 2012).
Figueira, G.M., Park, K.J., Brod, F.P.R., Honrio, S.L., 2004.
Evaluation of desorption isotherms, drying rates and inulin
concentration of chicory roots (Cichorium intybus L.) with and
without enzymatic inactivation. J. Food Eng. 63, 273280.
Gabas, A.L., Telis, V.R.N., Sobral, P.J.A., Telis-romero, J., 2007. Effect
of maltodextrin and arabic gumin water vapor sorption
thermodynamic properties of vacuumdried pineapple pulp
powder. J. Food Eng. 82, 246256.
Kulchan, R., Boonsupthip, W., Suppakul, P., 2010. Shelf life
prediction of packaged cassava-our-based baked product by
using empirical models and activation energy for water
vapour permeability of polyolen lms. J. Food Eng. 100,
461467.
Lima, A.G.B., Nebra, S.A., Queiroz, M.R., 2000. Scientic and
technological aspects of the banana. Rer. Bras. Prod Agroind.
2, 87101.
Maroulis, Z.B., Tsami, E., Marinoskouris, D., 1988. Application of
the GAB model to the moisture sorption isotherms for dried
fruits. J. Food Eng. 7, 6370.
Menezes, E.W., Tadini, C.C., Tribess, T.B., Zuleta, A., Binaghi, J.,
Pak, N., Vera, G., Dan, M.C.T., Bertolini, A.C., Cordenunsi, B.R.,
Lajolo, F.M., 2011. Chemical composition and nutritional value
of unripe banana our (Musa acuminata, var. Nanico). Plant
Foods Hum. Nutr. 66, 231237.
Mishra, S., Rai, T., 2006. Morphology and functional properties of
corn, potato and tapioca starches. Food Hydrocoll. 20, 557566.
Mishra, V.K., Ooraikul, B., Temelli, F., 1996. Physical
characterization and water sorption of freeze dried dulse
Palmaria palmata powder. J. Food Process. Preserv. 20, 2539.
Mota, R.V., Lajolo, F.M., Ciacco, C., Cordenunsi, B.R., 2000.
Composition and functional properties of banana our from
different varieties. Starch 52, 6368.
Mujumdar, A.S., 1995. Handbook of Industrial Drying. Marcel
Dekker, New York.
Muyonga, J.H., Ramteke, R.S., Eipeson, W.E., 2001. Predehydration
steaming changes physicochemical properties of unripe
banana our. J. Food Process. Preserv. 25, 3547.
Okos, M.R., Narsimhan, G., Singh, R.K., Witnauer, A.C., 1992. Food
dehydration. In: Heldman, D.R., Lund, D.B. (Eds.), Handbook of
Food Engineering. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 437562.
Park, K.J., Bin, A., Brod, F.P.R., 2001. Sorption isotherms data and
mathematical models for pear bartlett (Pyrus sp.) with and
without osmotic dehydration. Cinc. Tecnol. Aliment. 21,
7377.
Peng, G., Chen, X., Wu, W., Jiang, X., 2007. Modeling of water
sorption isothermfor corn starch. J. Food Eng. 80, 562567.
Perdomo, J., Cova, A., Sandoval, A.J., Garca, L., Laredo, E., Mller,
A.J., 2009. Glass transition temperatures and water sorption
isotherms of cassava starch. Carbohydr. Polym. 76, 305313.
Raghavan, G.S.V., Orsat, V., 2007. Recent advances in drying of
biomaterials for superior quality bioproducts. Asia-Pac. J.
Chem. Eng. 2, 2029.
Rickard, J.E., Behn, K.R., 1987. Evaluation of acid and enzyme
hydrolytic methods for the determination of cassava starch. J.
Sci. Food Agric. 41, 373379.
Rockland, L.B., 1969. Water activity and storage stability. Food
Technol. 23, 12411251.
Rockland, L.B., Nishi, S.K., 1980. Inuence of water activity on
food product quality and stability. Food Technol. 34, 4259.
Salwin, H., 1963. Moisture levels required for stability in
dehydrated foods. Food Technol. 17, 11141121.
Santos, F.S.A., Figueirdo, R.M.F., Queiroz, A.J.M., 2004. Moisture
adsorption isotherms of spiced cassava our. Rer. Bras. Prod
Agroind. 6, 149155.
Sing, K.S.W., Everett, D.H., Haul, R.A.W., Moscou, L., Pierotti, R.A.,
Rouquerol, J., Siemieniewska, T., 1985. Reporting
physisorption data for gas solid systems with special
references to the determination of surface-area and porosity.
Pure Appl. Chem. 57, 603619.
Souza, T.C.L., Souza, H.A.L., Pena, R., 2013. A rapid method to
obtaining moisture sorption isotherms of a starchy product.
Starch 65, 433436.
Yanniotis, S., Blahovec, J., 2009. Model analysis of sorption
isotherms. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 42, 16881695.