Project Charter Approval of the Project Charter indicates an understanding of the purpose and content described in this deliverable. By signing this deliverable, the project sponsor agrees that work should be initiated on the A Feasibility Study: The Upgrading of the Johannesburg Urban Collar and the resources described within should be committed. This Charter is recommended by: Name Title Signature Date Christopher de Wet Project Leader Michael Loewke Project Member Yashmee Bhana Jogessar Project Member Craig Baker Project Member Michael Savvides Project Member Siyasanga Sobetwa Project Member Shiva Y Subramoney Project Member
SECTION 1. OVERVIEW 1.1 Brief Project Scope 1.1.1 Project Objective Provide innovative financial methods for the upgrading of the Johannesburg Urban Collar by the 29 th
of November 2013. The upgrading of the Johannesburg Urban Collar must set out a comprehensive framework to manage and minimize the effects of bad debts payment by residents in the area, crime including the hijacking of buildings, and general area degradation in order to improve the banks view of the area. 1.1.2 Project Stakeholders a. City of Johannesburg municipality b. Persons living, working and visiting the area c. Banks and other investors 1.1.3 Stakeholder Needs a. Provide innovative financial solutions in order to improve the economic, social and financial viability of the Johannesburg Urban Collar. b. The financial solutions should reduce bad debt repayment of people living in the area, reduce crime and eliminate hijacking of buildings. c. As a result of a and b : Improve economic activity of the area Improve social status of the area Increase in people who can pay off debts to move into the area to stay 1.1.4 Stakeholder Requirements a. A number of possible solutions are to be provided in order to improve the urban collar. b. The feasibility study must particularly focus on minimizing and managing bad debt repayment of people living in the area, reduce crime and eliminate hijacking of buildings c. The feasibility study must be able to be used by technocrats or lay persons.
6
d. The feasibility study must be socially, environmentally and culturally acceptable to all stakeholders. e. Where possible, the The feasibility study must provide jobs for local unskilled and skilled labour.
1.2 Assumptions The following assumptions were made: a. When considering the environment this implies consideration of the social and economic environment. b. The cost of implementing the Management and Monitoring Plan is significantly important to the stakeholders. c. The feasibility study is only applicable to Johannesburg Urban Collar. d. The engineers that are appointed from the consulting firm to compile the feasibility study are qualified to complete the work but are inexperienced. This project will form part of their practical training and is fundamental to their development as project managers. e. The resources and hours available on this project are limited as it is charged to the company overheads, therefore the appointed engineers will gain experience in resource management. f. The contract between the client and the consultant will be selected and set up by the appointed engineers, thus giving them exposure to the Law of Contracts and the suitability of various contracts. g. South Africa is a developing country and job creation is a vital outcome of all projects.
7
SECTION 2. DELIVERABLES 2.1 Final Deliverable 2.1.1 Definition of Final Deliverable Compile a report which will contain the feasibility of various solutions which would improve the Johannesburg Urban Collar. The report shall contain sufficient information and techniques to improve the economic activity, reduce crime and improve social status of the Urban Collar. 2.1.2 Stakeholders Criteria for Acceptance The following stakeholder criteria are required for acceptance: a. Any solution considered to minimize and manage the effects crime. This will be determined through extensive research and engineering judgement. b. Checklists will be used to measure the potential of each solution to guarantee that all basic living condition requirements, as stipulated in the constitution. Any solution that meets 100% of the requirements on the checklist will be further considered. c. The solutions deemed acceptable according to points a. and b will be assessed and the most feasible chosen 2.2 Organizational Deliverables a. Establish a framework/template, which is based on acceptable project management practices, to effectively and correctly complete non-profit projects b. Create a Project Management methodology/approach for producing implementation plans of a similar nature. c. Implicit marketing within a new sector (government projects) through the success of the Implementation Plan and stakeholder satisfaction. d. Develop a database of information pertaining to the current situation and potential solutions in the company library.
8
2.3 Organizational Goals a. Be a part of the development of the country. b. Experience in government projects. c. Improved understanding of: Project Management Principles, Techniques and Tools and effective use thereof. Managing cost constraints as this is a pro-bono project and the costs to company must be kept to a minimum. Managing time constraints due to the limited number of hours available. The benefits and constraints of each type of contract commonly used on non-profit, small, government projects. The effects of climate change, specifically water scarcity, and how to minimize and manage these effects. Hence, improving the awareness of the environment and designing engineering systems that are in line with sustainable development principles.
9
SECTION 3. MILESTONES 3.1 Project Milestones The following is a summary of the expected milestones of the project: a. Background Research b. Detailed Scope of Work (SOW) c. Project Management Plan (with subsidiary plans - Project scope management plan, Schedule management plan, Cost management plan, Quality management plan, Process improvement plan, Staffing management plan, Communication management plan, Risk management plan, Procurement management plan) d. Logical Framework Approach (LFA) e. Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) f. Scheduling (Ganatt Chart, CPN) g. Surveys/Interviews h. Studies and Analysis of Alternative Solutions i. Detailed description of solutions Part 1-3 j. Develop layout of the solution k. Determine the Expected Cost of the proposed solution l. Determine the Expected Time Frame of the solution m. Compile the Report n. Submit the Report to the Client
10
3.2 Project Status Reports Type of Report Required By Frequency Content Progress Report Project Leader Monthly Progress to date with quality checks.
Timesheets Scheduler and Weekly Hours spent during the week Project Leader on the project.
Meeting Minutes Team Within two Details of the meeting days of the (duties, deadlines, problems) meeting.
3.3 Project Deadline The report containing the feasibility study must be handed over to the Client on the 29 th of November 2013.
11
SECTION 4. ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING 4.1 Organizational Priorities Priorities listed in descending importance: a. Lower Costs b. Innovative solutions c. Earlier Delivery Since the feasibility study is a pro-bono project it is deemed that the lowest possible cost-to-company is of most importance. Increasing the features is classified as being slightly less important because the stakeholders needs and requirements still need to be satisfied. Early delivery requires additional resources and funding, therefore it is of least importance.
4.2 Organizational Constraints 4.2.1 Staffing Limits The following staffing limits apply: a. Staffing quantity limits of: no less than 5 team members and no more than 7 team members. b. Staffing time limit of 200-300 hours. 4.2.2 Spending Limits The spending limit for internal costs is R900,000-00. No external costs are expected.
12
4.3 Project Team Project Leader: Christopher de Wet
Project Members: Siyasanga Sobetwa Yashmee Bhana Jogessar Michael Leowke Michael Savvides Shiva Y Subramoney