Estancias v. Schultz (TX) Nuisance (Balancing of Equities = Injunction, Fairness,
Public Interest) Boomer v. Atlantic Cement (NY) Nuisance (Balancing of Equities = Temp. Inj. until Permanent Damages, Environmental -> Legislature ) Spur v. Del Webb (AZ) Nuisance (Compensated Injunction, Coming to Nuisance, Public Interest, Foreseeability) Willard v. 1st Church of Christ (CA) Easement (Grantor's Intent and Reservation to Third Party Ok) Holbrook v. Taylor (KY) Easement (License Becomes Irrevocable -> Estoppel, Fairness) Van Sandt v. Roystor (KS) Easement (Implication -> Necessity, Sewer System) Othen v. Rosier (TX) Easement (Implication -> Necessity, Unity of Ownership, Time of Severance) Matthews v. Bay Head (NJ) Easement (Public Trust Doctrine -> Quasi-Public Entity, Common Law actions not government so not a taking) Brown v. Voss (WA) Easement (Implication -> Necessity, Balancing of Equities, Fairness, Appurtenance and Intensity of Use, Unequal Bargaining Power) Pressault v. U.S. (1st Cir) Easement (Abandonment as Termination, Gov't Taking Fee Simple) Tulk v. Moxhay (Eng) Covenants (Notice Only for Burden to Run w/ Land, Privity not Necessary unless for Benefit; trending away from that) Sanborn v. McLean (MI) Covenants (Reciprocal Easement, Common Owner, Certainty, Notice only requirement, Neg. Rest. Easement Doc - applies to Com. Ownr) Neponsit v. Savings Bank (NY) Covenants (Property Values = Touch and Concern, American Rule Burden In Gross Runs w/ Land) Hill v. Comm. Damien Molokai (NM) Covenants (Construction of Covenants, FHA restrictions - 3 Distinct Claims, Ambiguity can Void; Morgan's Final Notes - Public Policy*) Shelley v. Kraemer (US) Covenants (Racially Restrictive Covenants, Not Followed) Western Land v. Trusolaski (NV) Covenants (Rest. Covenants, Fairness, Abandonment can't be Sporadic) Case List Policies - Main Points
Rick v. West (NY) Covenants (Unilateral Termination, Fairness, Certainty) Pocono Springs v. MacKenzie (PA) Covenants (Can only abandon Fee Simple Absolute w/ imperfect title, some states allow) Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village (CA) HOA (Unreasonableness of Restrictions, Alienability, Neighbors Uniformity and Expectations) Taormina Theos. Com. v. Silver (CA) HOA (No restrictions based on philosophy/religion) Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. (US) Zoning (Police Power of State, Reasonableness; Comprehensive Plan, Board of Adj. or Board of Appeals, and/or Archit. Board) PA NW v. Zoning Hearing Board (PA) Zoning (Retro-Active Nonconforming Use, Against Amortization-unfair in pre-exist. non-conforming use; Dissent and most states in favor of...) Commons v. Westwood Zoning Board (NJ) Zoning (Unreasonable Denial of Variance, Undue Hardship, Can't Zone into Inutility) Cope v. Inhabitants of the Town of Brunswick (ME) Zoning (Special Exception, Need Reasons for Denial, No Vagueness for Reviewing Criteria) State v. City of Rochester (MN) Zoning (Rezoning, Flexibility, Rational Basis, 3 Methods to Challenge: Quasi-Judicial, Incons. w/ Comp. Plan, and Spot Zoning) Fasano v. Brd of Cty Comm. (OR) Zoning (In Dissent -> Legislative Action/Large # of Ppl = Arb & Capricious, Small Group Judicial action so judicial review) State ex rel. Stoyanoff v. Berkeley (MO) Zoning (Aesthetic Regulation is part of General Welfare/Property Values) Anderson v. Cit of Issaquah (WA) Zoning (Aesthetic Regulations must give Clear Guidance as to what is acceptable) Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas (US) Zoning (Household Composition, Protect Family Values if not in violation of FHA) Kelo v. City of New London (US) Eminent D(Public Purpose can be Future Public Use, Private Use of if E.D. because of public interest -> economic redevelopment) Loretto v. Teleprmpter (US) Eminent D (Permanent Phys. Occ. Are all Takings) Case List Policies - Main Points
Hadacheck v. Sebastian (US) Eminent D (Mitigating Nuisance Taking; see Lucas) PA Coal Co. v. Mahon (US) Eminent D (Conceptual Severance, Economic Value, P v. P Interest) Penn Ctrl v. New York (US) Eminent D (Conceptual Severance, P v. P interest, Distinct- IBE, Non-Conforming Use Doctrine) Lucas v. South Carolina (US) Eminent D (100% Econ. Wipeout, Taking if back. princ. of state law) Palazzolo v. R. Island (US) Eminent D (Challenge Regulation Est. Prior to Purchase Date) Tahoe-Sierra v. Tahoe Regional (US) Eminent D (Moratorium on devel Taking, Conceptual Severance/Time)
American Rivers, Inc., and The State of Vermont v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Green Mountain Power and Trout Unlimited, Intervenors, 129 F.3d 99, 2d Cir. (1997)