0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
34 vues2 pages
Summative assessments are outcome measures that emphasize student achievement rather than aptitude or effort. They provide information concerning a student's mastery of specific course material. They also provide a basis for comparing student achievement to reference groups and / or external performance criteria.
Summative assessments are outcome measures that emphasize student achievement rather than aptitude or effort. They provide information concerning a student's mastery of specific course material. They also provide a basis for comparing student achievement to reference groups and / or external performance criteria.
Summative assessments are outcome measures that emphasize student achievement rather than aptitude or effort. They provide information concerning a student's mastery of specific course material. They also provide a basis for comparing student achievement to reference groups and / or external performance criteria.
Summative assessments are designed to measure student understanding following a sustained
period of instruction with the focus on identifying the level of student mastery and the effectiveness of instruction. As such, summative assessments are outcome measures that emphasize student achievement rather than aptitude or effort. Summative Assessments Provide: Information concerning a student's mastery of specific course material A basis for comparing student achievement to reference groups and/or external performance criteria A means of determining the effectiveness of instructional activities b!ective information for assigning course grades "omparative data to determine student placement A means of holding teachers and schools accountable for student learning "ontent#specific information to inform parents and future teachers $iagnostic information about strengths and wea%nesses in student performance $ata to determine achievement of departmental or curriculum performance standards Advantages Disadvantages &ecessary for determining students' grades and placement 'endency for over#reliance on summative measures (romotes teacher and school accountability )ay promote cheating due to high sta%es nature of assessment (rovides a means of evaluating instructional activities *as been criticized for promoting +teaching to the test+ ,ncourages students' active engagement with course material $oes not provide information for correcting errors 'est writing process- .. planning the test / content blueprint 0learning outcomes, weight1 and length 0types and number of items1 2. 3riting test items / simple and direct wording, avoid !argon, avoid trivia items, match items to learning outcomes, each tem has an agreed upon correct answer, write more 4uestions than you will need1 5. Selecting test items / outcome weight, 4uestions by type, 4uestions for each type of outcome 6. 7ormatting the test / group items by type, sort items by increasing difficulty, add instructions, review layout and pagination, write answer %ey 8. Assessing the test 9. :evising the test ;. <sing the test =. After the test / item analysis, areas for review, test revisions Formative Assessment in the Classroom 7ormative assessments are ongoing, repetitive measures designed to provide information to both the instructor and students concerning students' understanding of small segments of course material. As an integrated approach to assessment and instruction, formative assessments emphasize mastery of course material as opposed to evaluation of performance or assignment of grades. Formative Assessments Provide: Insight on students' strengths and conceptual errors in relation to specific course concepts >uidance to improve student understanding A means of monitoring progress in learning $iagnostic information concerning students' errors in understanding A non#threatening environment to identify and correct problems in learning and instruction 7eedbac% to the instructor concerning the effectiveness of instructional activities Advantages Disadvantages Allows for the identification of conceptual errors )ay be difficult to motivate students' performance on low sta%e assignment (romotes active reflection on the effectiveness of instruction 'ime consuming for instructor to provide effective feedbac% ,ncourages feedbac% that enhances learning Intensive dedication re4uired to continue ongoing assessment ?ow sta%e nature prevents motivation for student cheating )ay not be practical for large enrollment classes