Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 3

1

p1 7-7-2014 Re Gazette-scanning-SUICIDE- SUPPLEMENT-01


INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1
st
edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by making a reservation, by fax
0011-61-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com
Free download of documents at blog Http://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati
1
WI THOUT PREJ UDI CE 2
Mr Clive Palmer Palmer United Party 7-7-2014 3
Admin@PalmerUnited.com 4
5
Cc: Christine Fyffe, Speaker christine.fyffe@parliament.vic.gov.au 6
Mr Chernov Governorf of Victoria-etc enquiries@govhouse.vic.gov.au 7
Jacqui Lambie, Senator-ELECT senator.ketter@aph.gov.au 8
Mr Clive Palmer Palmer United Party Admin@PalmerUnited.com 9
Mr Tony Abbott PM Tony.Abbott.MP@aph.gov.au 10
Mr D. Napthine Premier of Victoria denis.napthine@parliament.vic.gov.au 11
Treasurer Michael OBrien michael.obrien@parliament.vic.gov.au 12
Daniel Andrews leader ALP daniel.andrews@parliament.vic.gov.au 13
Mr Geoff Shaw geoff.shaw@parliament.vic.gov.au 14
Robert Clark Attorney General robert.clark@parliament.vic.gov.au 15
Louise Asher louise.asher@parliament.vic.gov.au 16
Bruce Atkinson bruce.atkinson@parliament.vic.gov.au 17
Matthew Johnston matthew.johnston@news.com.au 18
David Hurley david.hurley@news.com.au 19
Mr Ken Smith ken.smith@parliament.vic.gov.au 20
George Williams george.williams@unsw.edu.au 21
tim.bull@parliament.vic.gov.au, david.davis@parliament.vic.gov.au, martin.dixon@parliament.vic.gov.au, 22
damian.drum@parliament.vic.gov.au, matthew.guy@parliament.vic.gov.au, 23
david.hodgett@parliament.vic.gov.au, wendy.lovell@parliament.vic.gov.au, 24
terence.mulder@parliament.vic.gov.au, premier@dpc.vic.gov.au, russell.northe@parliament.vic.gov.au, 25
edward.o'donohue@parliament.vic.gov.au, inga.peulich@parliament.vic.gov.au, gordon.rich- 26
phillips@parliament.vic.gov.au, peter.ryan@parliament.vic.gov.au, ryan.smith@parliament.vic.gov.au, 27
heidi.victoria@parliament.vic.gov.au, nick.wakeling@parliament.vic.gov.au, 28
peter.walsh@parliament.vic.gov.au, kim.wells@parliament.vic.gov.au, 29
mary.wooldridge@parliament.vic.gov.au 30
31
Ref; 20140706-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Mr Clive Palmer-Gazette-scanning-SUICIDE-etc SUPPLEMENT-01 32
Clive, 33
further to my 6-7-2014r correspondence I raised the following issue: 34
35
Family Court of Australia-WHAT SECURITY? 36
37
Anyone who lately attends to a court will be aware that there are string of people employed as 38
security costing not millions but billions of dollars in the overall. Before this all evented I altered 39
the then Premier Mr Jeff Kennett of Victoria that I was given the understanding by a person that 40
this person intended to cause considerable harm with the court. It was subsequently that the 41
courts then started to implement security systems, well did they really? 42
. 43
With my special lifeline service e MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL I was regularly 44
contact by people who contemplated suicide and even murder. And it was of such a person who 45
indicate to contemplate to kill some judges. Hence my reason to express my concerns to the then 46
Premier of Victoria albeit not disclosing any identity of the person concerned. 47
48
Some 30 years ago I was cross-examining a witness and then made a comment that the trail 49
judge interrupted me making clear that I was not allowed to mislead the witness with a statement 50



2
p2 7-7-2014 Re Gazette-scanning-SUICIDE- SUPPLEMENT-01
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1
st
edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by making a reservation, by fax
0011-61-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com
Free download of documents at blog Http://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati
that was not on evidence. I then explained to the trail judge that I did no more but quote from an 51
Affidavit that was filed. His Honour denied such an Affidavit was filed as he had no copy of it. I 52
then produced a sealed copy and His Honour adjourned the hearing so court staff could locate the 53
missing affidavit. After several Hours the court recovered and the trail judge announced that no 54
original could be located in the court registry. I produce d the sealed copy and the opponent 55
counsel confirmed to have a like copy of it and had been served long ago, and in fact had 56
responded upon it. The trial judge then accepted this copy with original court stamp while I 57
(having spare copies) used one of the spare copies. As result I had the habit to make sure always 58
to have several spare copied of each document with me and from time to time judges would 59
indicate they didnt have on file the original, this when I would ask at commencement of 60
proceedings if His Honour/Her Honour to check if all parties and the court had the same 61
documents before them. 62
63
During 2012 I had to attend on various occasions to the Family Court of Australia at Melbourne 64
as to file for a law firm document of their client. 65
To get to the Registry to file or to inspect the files you require to go down by lift or by staircase. 66
When you go down the stair case then to the right are the various desk of staff where documents 67
are filed, as well as an inquiry desk. At the end of the staircase are rows of seats, to sit to wait 68
your turn after having taken a number to file documents. 69
Immediately to the left there is an opening (about the size of double doors) where there is a 70
counter to ask for inspection of files, various counters to work on and 2 photo copies. This room 71
is not sealed off by any doors. Anyone sitting on the chairs or just coming down stairs has access 72
to this room. And as I noticed at times various piles of different cases of court documents are left 73
on the counter for court staff to collect them, when they consider to have the time to do so, and as 74
this at times can take half an hour or more anyone can take the lot or remove parts of it. While 75
one has to make a request to inspect the files, there is no weight check as to en sure that the total 76
weight of the files going out are booked back in. As such, anyone, including the person who 77
check the files can remove or add to the documents. In the case I had to inspect I discovered a 78
Affidavit on file that was more than 80 pages but never had been served upon the party of the 79
solicitors I was assisting, and so I copied the entire document. At no time was afterwards either a 80
copy served. As such, what I was able to establish is that there is absolutely no proper security in 81
the family court of Australia at Melbourne., this despite all those security guards employed at the 82
entranced, this as they do not check anyone who may leave with items not belonging to them 83
and/or have no right to take from the court building. 84
When at times sitting to await to file documents I could see lawyers just dumping the files back 85
on the counter and no one there to receive them. Anyone could unauthorised then have interfered 86
with the files left there unsupervised. 87
As such, I discovered beyond any doubt that there is absolutely no proper security in regard of 88
court files as lawyers in particular can add and/or remove documents. 89
Now take it that you have an opponent who remove critical Affidavit of the opponent party 90
(generally unrepresented as they may not be aware of how the court system operates and/or 91
malfunction) and the trail judge is not aware of this. The trail judge then considers the case 92
without realising that the lawyers of one party may have slipped in an Affidavit which was never 93
served upon the other party or that documents are missing from the file. The unhappy defeated 94
party appeals but the Full court on appeal n either will be aware that documents were unlawfully 95
added or removed by the lawyers in the case against the appellant. So, the losing appellant en ds 96
up with a huge legal bill to pay for the lawyers who committed the fraud, and is obviously very 97
unhappy because in his/her mind he/she had a valid case but unaware the opponent lawyers 98
removed/added documents unlawfully. 99


3
p3 7-7-2014 Re Gazette-scanning-SUICIDE- SUPPLEMENT-01
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1
st
edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by making a reservation, by fax
0011-61-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com
Free download of documents at blog Http://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati
In the case of the more than 80 page Affidavit that was neve r served, already it had been subject 100
to a judgment before I discovered it. It took some time for me to convince the (interstate based) 101
law firm I should check the files because I held something was not right, and upon inspection it 102
turned out it wasnt. One can basically remove anything from the Family Court of Australia 103
at Melbourne, and also of other courts and no one may detect this because security is 104
geared up to detect what comes in that should not be taken in but not as to what is taken 105
out. As such, reality is that then security is non-existent! No doors or cameras either 106
where needed! No scanning in of documents being filed, and so no record what really 107
should be on file! And you wonder why people at the losing end of court cases end up 108
committing suicide when to their understanding they filed the material but the judgment does as 109
if they never did, and then grieving not just the loss of the court case and/or the orders for cost 110
against them but also by this may have lost to see his/her children leaves them no alternative but 111
to contemplate suicide. Judges and police will hold this person simply couldnt handle having 112
lost a case, whereas the real issue is that the lawyers have so to say blood on their hands and 113
acted in defiance of JUSTICE and their oath as an OFFICER OF THE COURT and manipulated 114
the case misusing and abusing their powers. 115
When I became aware from media reports that Opus J of the Family Court of Australia was shot 116
dead it was absolutely no surprise to me that this had eventuated. In fact it is more a surprise to 117
me not many more lawyers have since been killed, and nothing to do with security. 118
It is not that Opus J may have done anything wrong per se, but that someone may have not 119
accepted that the ruling of the judge was appropriate and decided so to say to TAKE THE LAW 120
INTO HIS/HER OWN HANDS. It may have then also been a case where lawyers may have 121
acted inappropriately by removing and/or adding documents to cause the judge, unaware of this 122
unlawful conduct by lawyers, to hand down a decision that appeared appropriate upon the 123
evidence before him. I was experiencing how registrars are deliberately misleading a party as to 124
enhance the other party (usually lawyers with whom they are associated with) to give 125
inappropriately advantage to gain court orders. Fabricating/falsifying signatures, etc. 126
Just consider how you would like it if you were involved in a court case and the lawyers of the 127
other party can sneak in documents into the court file to which you and your lawyers have no 128
knowledge off and/or those opponent lawyers remove certain Affidavit material you filed or 129
distort it by interfering with the content therein? Would you really accept this as being 130
appropriate, if as result you lost the case which otherwise you may have won? 131
For the last 2 years I reported to the Telecommunication Industry Ombudsman that merely 132
connecting to the Internet I noticed at time my counter to rake up 320MB even so I had not 133
activated my internet explorer. It now appears that I was subject to malicious activities which 134
resulted in destroying files I had on the Family Court of Australia of 2012. I am now 135
reconstructing the files from other hard drives but expect ASIO most likely has been at work to 136
try to wipe out all damaging evidence I had collected against the Family Court of Australia. 137
While reconstructing files can be cumbersome and very time consuming I have no doubt I will. 138
But one may ask is this how our court system should operate? 139
140
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to contain legal advice 141
nor to refer to all issues/details. 142
143
MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL 144
. 145
(Our name is our motto!) 146
147
Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O. W. B. (Friends call me Gerrit) 148