0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
35 vues9 pages
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SENATE Bills Filed Status / Remarks HB 980 and HB 1691 were referred to SJPC member agencies for review and preparation of official position papers. Amendments to the current law to strengthen the institutional capacity of the Office were proposed. Amendment will allow for the immediate implementation of Ombudsman decisions even during election period.
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SENATE Bills Filed Status / Remarks HB 980 and HB 1691 were referred to SJPC member agencies for review and preparation of official position papers. Amendments to the current law to strengthen the institutional capacity of the Office were proposed. Amendment will allow for the immediate implementation of Ombudsman decisions even during election period.
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SENATE Bills Filed Status / Remarks HB 980 and HB 1691 were referred to SJPC member agencies for review and preparation of official position papers. Amendments to the current law to strengthen the institutional capacity of the Office were proposed. Amendment will allow for the immediate implementation of Ombudsman decisions even during election period.
Outcome 4. Improved Policy Environment for Good Governance Sub-outcome 4.1. Greater Support for the Passage of Priority Legislations
Brief Description
The Ombudsmans Act of 1989 or Republic Act No. 6770 provides the directive for the functional and structural organization of the Office of the Ombudsman. Amendments to the current law to strengthen the institutional capacity of the Office were proposed that will cover, among others, the powers and functions of the Ombudsman and fiscal autonomy of the Office. Specifically, this includes strengthening the subpoena powers and contempt powers of the Ombudsman, which will include access to bank records. Further, the amendment will allow for the immediate implementation of Ombudsman decisions even during election period and protection for whistleblowers in corrupt cases as well as immunity for Ombudsman investigators, complainants and witnesses from criminal, administrative, and civil suits.
Strengthening the Sandiganbayan HB 139 (Rep. Abaya) HB 3992 (Rep. R. Rodriguez) HB 4108 (Rep. Tupas) Pending with the Committee on Justice (Chair: Rep. N. Tupas)
HB 980 and HB 1691 were referred to SJPC member agencies on August 12, 2013 for review and preparation of official position papers
HB 1691 was also referred to GGACC member agencies for review and preparation of official position papers
Ombudsman draft 9DBM and DOJ reservations to be reviewed towards a consensus)
No consensus from the cluster
Referred to Reps. Tupas, Robredo and Farias
May be filed on a piece-meal basis or as single omnibus measure bill
Referred to SJPC member agencies for review and preparation of official position papers
Administration version referred to Reps. Robredo, Tupas and Farias; DBM & DOJ reservations to be reviewed towards a consensus
Pending with the Committee on Jus- tice (Chair: Rep. N. Tupas) SB 1148 (Sen. Trillanes) Ombudsman Act
SB 396 ((Sen. Santiago) Ombudsman Act
SB 1725 (Sen. Angara) Amending Sec. 6, Forfei- ture Law (Value of For- feited Properties in Cor- ruption Cases)
SB 1606 (Sen. Estrada) Amending Sec. 6, Forfei- ture Law
SB 1162 (Sen. Trillanes) Forfeiture Powers of the State
SB 605 (Sen. Escudero) Forfeiture Law (Fixed Percentage of the Value of Forfeited Properties) Pending in the Committee on Justice and Human Rights (Chairman: Sen. Pimentel III)
TWG Held on Feb. 13, 2014
The Office of the Om- budsman is still on the stage of drafting their version, though, per their DLLS, the Amendments to the Sandiganbayan Act is their top priority followed by the Forfei- ture Law then the Om- budsman Charter FREEDOM OF INFORMATION BILL
Lead Agency: Presidential Communications Development
and Strategic Planning Oce
Outcome 4. Improved Policy Environment for Good Governance Sub-outcome 4.1. Greater Support for the Passage of Priority Legislations
Brief Description
The proposed Freedom of Information Act aims to mandate the disclosure of public documents. The proposed bill also outlines the exceptions for public disclosure and the procedures for accessing public documents. The Technical Working Group for the Administration Bill agreed to a number of balancing amendments proposed by advocates (such as but not limited to the Right to Know, Right Now Coalition) to address possible government abuse of the exceptions. There are also specific procedures for access remedies in case of denial, and provision for the Freedom of Information Manual or the Peoples Ownership of Government Information Manual.
TWG deliberations of the proposed consolidated version on-going.
HB 3237 is identical with draft Administration version submitted by PCDSPO
Lead Agency: PCDSPO Agency Support: All Government Agencies
Referred to GGACC member agen- cies for review and preparation of official position papers
Administration version (GGACC draft; no endorsement from the Cluster)
Authors have been consolidating support from the Civil Society Orga- nizations SB 1733/CR 2
Peoples Freedom of Informa- tion Act of 2013 (Consolidated/Substituted Per Committee Report No. 2 Sept. 24, 2013)
In substitution of PS RES. 102 (Sen. Grace Poe), Freedom of Information Act
SB 1219 (Sen. Angara) Freedom of Information Act of 2013
SB 514 (Sen. Legarda) Freedom of Information Act of 2013
SB 217 (Sen. Ejercito) Freedom of Information Act of 2013
SB 90 (Sen. Alan Cayetano) Freedom of Information Act of 2013
SB 74 (Sen. Guingona) Peoples Freedom of Informa- tion Act of 2013
SB 64 (Sen.Honasan), Peoples Ownership of Govern- ment Information (POGI) Act of 2013
SB 44 (SEN. OSMENA) Freedom of Information Act
SB 36 (Sen. Trillanes) Freedom of Information Act of 2013
SB 18 (Sen. Escudero) Freedom of Information Act Approved on Third Reading (Mar. 10, 2014) CIVIL SERVICE CODE
Lead Agency: Civil Service Commission
Outcome 4. Improved Policy Environment for Good Governance Sub-outcome 4.1. Greater Support for the Passage of Priority Legislations
Brief Description
The pursuit of this priority legislation has been announced by the President during the 2013 State of the Nation Address (SONA). Currently, CSC is drafting its version of the Code. A CSC Technical Working Group (TWG) was created to expedite the drafting of the Code and coordinate with the Presidential Legislative Liaison Office (PLLO) and the Good Governance and Anti-Corruption Cluster of the Legislative Liaison System (LLS) for support for the early passage of the bill.
HB 2902 (Rep. Piamonte) Pending with the Committee on Civil Service and Professional Regulation (Chair: Rep. A. Salvacion, Jr.)
Lead Agency: CSC Agency Support: DBM
Referred to GGACC member- agen- cies for review and preparation of official position papers SB 1174 (Sen. Trillanes)
SB 2012 (Sen. J. Estrada) Pending with the Committee on Civil Service and Government Reorganization (Chairman: Sen. Trillanes)
CSC draft for approval of key stakeholders RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS AND PENSION LAW
FOR UNIFORMED PERSONNEL
Lead Agency: Department of Budget and Management
Outcome 4. Improved Policy Environment for Good Governance Sub-outcome 4.1. Greater Support for the Passage of Priority Legislations
Brief Description
The bill aims to reform the pension system covering the Armed Forces of the Philippines and the Philippine National Police to address sustainability concerns. The bills provisions include the removal of the indexation of retirement benefits and pension to the salaries of those in active duty. Instead, DBM and DOF shall be tasked to periodically review these rates and recommend increases for the approval of the President. It will also deactivate the AFP Retirement and Separation Benefits System (AFP-RSBS). New entrants into the system will contribute 9% of their monthly compensation while their employer will contribute 18%. There is also a proposal to return contributions to the AFP-RSBS of active personnel. Any deficiency in funding will be provided by the national government.
Outcome 4. Improved Policy Environment for Good Governance Sub-outcome 4.1. Greater Support for the Passage of Priority Legislations
Brief Description
The proposed bill seeks to aid in the prosecution of corrupt and erring public officials and employees through the provision of protection and reward for whistle blowers. It proposes to create a Whistle Blower Protection Council chaired by the Over-all Deputy Ombudsman. The council shall evaluate the qualification of whistleblowers and administer the provision of benefits and protection for them. Rewards of up to P400,000 plus 10% of any amount recovered will be provided to whistleblowers. It also grants whistleblowers immunity from liability for disclosures made under this bill.
SB 1286 (Sen. Estrada) Whis- tleblower Protection Act For 2013 These bills are pending in the committee on Justice and Human Rights (Chairman: Sen. Pimentel III)
DOJ version sub- mitted to Sen. Pimentel on Feb. 19, 2014
No Committee Hearing Schedule yet AMENDMENTS TO THE WITNESS PROTECTION,
SECURITY AND BENEFIT ACT
Lead Agency: Department of Justice
Outcome 4. Improved Policy Environment for Good Governance Sub-outcome 4.1. Greater Support for the Passage of Priority Legislations
Brief Description
The Witness Protection, Security, and Benefit Act or Republic Act No. 6981 was approved in 1991. This law affirms the duty of the government to secure witnesses of crimes and their families whose lives may be endangered. The current law needs to be amended in order to improve the conditions and procedures for providing protection and assistance to a witness during investigation and prosecution. Salient features of the bill include a separate witness protection program for legislature, the coverage of law enforc- ers under certain circumstances, additional responsibilities on the part of witnesses, addi- tional education benefits for dependents, automatic immunity from criminal prosecution, and immediate termination of protection benefits upon breach of MOA by witness.
HB 145 (Rep. Abaya) HB 224 (Rep. Cruz-Gonzales) HB 796 (Rep. Abayon) HB 1628 (Rep. R. Rodriguez) HB 1689 (Nograles) HB 1924 (Rep. D. Arroyo) HB 2069 (Rep. Nograles) HB 2119 (Rep. Teodoro) Pending with the Committee on Justice(Chair: Rep. N. Tupas)
DOJ supports the draft Committee Report
Lead Agency: DOJ Agency Support: OP, DBM, OMB SB 1136 (Sen. Santiago) Witness Confidentiality Act Pending in the Committee on Justice and Human Rights (Chairman: Sen. Pimentel III)
File on Aug. 6, 2013
Read on 1st reading, Aug. 28, 2013
DOJ version submitted to Sen. Pimentel on Feb. 13, 2014 FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY BILL
Lead Agency: Department of Budget and Management
Outcome 4. Improved Policy Environment for Good Governance Sub-outcome 4.1. Greater Support for the Passage of Priority Legislations
Brief Description
The proposed bill seeks to strengthen fiscal discipline in the public sector. It prescribes a set of principles that promote fiscal sustainability and prudent spending by ending the proliferation of unfunded laws through the implementation of an off-setting mechanism. It also seeks to institutionalize the Performance-Informed Budgeting started in 2013. Salient provisions of the bill are the inclusion of major final outputs and performance indicators in the formulation of the annual budget to be passed by Congress, restriction on the release of Personnel Services appropriations based on the information provided in the Govern- ment Manpower Information Service, and all expenditure bills to be passed by Congress must be offset by measures that provide for a permanent increase in revenue or a perma- nent reduction in other expenditures.
HB 142 (Rep. Abaya) HB2702 (Rep. Andaya) Pending with the Committee on Appropriations (Chair: Rep. I. Ungab)
Lead Agency: DBM Agency Support: DOF, NEDA
Referred to GGACC member agen- cies on for review and preparation of official position papers
Administration version (DBM draft; no endorsement from the Cluster)
HB 2702 (Rep. Andaya) is a re-file from the 15th Congress based on the DBM draft SB 626 (Sen. Recto) Fiscal Responsibility Act Pending in the Committee on Finance: (Chairman: Sen. Escudero)
1st Public Hearing held on Feb. 26, 2014. Sen. Escudero instructed the Com Sec to consolidate everything in preparation for a TWG
The DBM is yet to submit the admin version (as reported out on Mar. 6th) CRIMINAL CODE
Lead Agency: Department of Justice
Outcome 4. Improved Policy Environment for Good Governance Sub-outcome 4.1. Greater Support for the Passage of Priority Legislations
Brief Description
The proposed bill aims to amend the Revised Penal Code of the Philippines.
HB 2032 (Rep. Tupas) (Administration bill) Pending with the Committee on Justice (Chair: Rep. N. Tupas)
The Criminal Code Commission held public hearing/consultation in Tagaytay on 3/6/14 for purposes of introducing perfecting amendments.
The Committee held a public hearing on September 20, 2013 in Cebu City to explain to the people the merits of the measure and to solicit comments from stakeholders. The Committee agreed to create a TWG to fine tune the provisions of the measure.
Present during the hearing were Chair Tupas, reps. Relampagos, Loyola, Salimbangon and Caminero.
Present as resource persons were Asst. Sol. Gen. Marissa Guillen, Govt. Coporate Counsel Raoul Creencia and Parole Probation Administrator Manuel Co.
Lead Agency: DOJ
Referred to the SJPC member cluster for review and preparation of official position papers
Administration version (DOJ draft; no endorsement from the Cluster) No Bill Filed No Bill Filed
Public Hearing held at Tagaytay on March 6, 2014
A modified draft on Book I (modification of HB 2300, Rep. Tupas) was created and presented to the SC Justices including CJ Sereno and garnered good response; the Criminal Code Committee (CCC) will prepare the draft HoR Committee Report; same draft will then be endorsed to the Senate together with the draft Book II.
Book II draft is on its final stages, conducting con- sultations and FGD with stakeholders CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION BILL
Lead Agency: Department of Justice
Outcome 4. Improved Policy Environment for Good Governance Sub-outcome 4.1. Greater Support for the Passage of Priority Legislations
Brief Description
The proposed bill seeks to strengthen, streamline and rationalize the criminal investigation process in the country by instituting the following major reforms: 1) harmonize and integrate the functions of the investigating law enforcer and the investigating prosecutor in criminal investigations, 2) repeal Republic Act No. 5180, the law which presently governs the conduct of preliminary investigations. Ultimately, this Bill seeks to streamline the criminal investigation process by providing only two simple steps: criminal investigation, and preliminary hearing.
HB 2032 (Rep. Tupas) (Administration Bill) Pending with the Committee on Justice (Chair: Rep. Tupas)
The Criminal Code Commission held public hearing/consultation in Tagay- tay on 3/6/14 for purposes of intro- ducing perfecting amendments.
The Committee held a public hearing on September 20, 2013 in Cebu City to explain to the people the merits of the measure and to solicit comments from stakeholders. The Committee agreed to create a TWG to fine tune the provisions of the measure.
Present during the hearing were Chair Tupas, reps. Relampagos, Loyola, Salimbangon and Caminero.
Present as resource persons were Asst. Sol. Gen. Marissa Guillen, Govt. Coporate Counsel Raoul Creencia and Parole Probation Administrator Manuel Co.
Lead Agency: DOJ
Referred to the SJPC member cluster for review and preparation of official position papers
Administration version (DOJ draft; no endorsement from the Cluster) No Bill Filed Administration version endorsed to Sen. Drilon, Sen. Pimentel and Sen. Guingona