0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
28 vues5 pages
This document discusses the stability of different power system configurations under faults.
Part 1 analyzes a 50MW installation and finds it is only stable for fault clearance times of 0.12s or less, which does not meet the minimum criteria of 0.1s.
Part 2 analyzes a 60MW installation and similarly finds it is only stable for fault clearance times of 0.14s or less, again not meeting the 0.1s minimum.
Parts 3-4 find that adding an additional transmission line or series capacitors to the 60MW installation allows it to operate stably at the minimum 0.1s fault clearance time by increasing the stability margin.
This document discusses the stability of different power system configurations under faults.
Part 1 analyzes a 50MW installation and finds it is only stable for fault clearance times of 0.12s or less, which does not meet the minimum criteria of 0.1s.
Part 2 analyzes a 60MW installation and similarly finds it is only stable for fault clearance times of 0.14s or less, again not meeting the 0.1s minimum.
Parts 3-4 find that adding an additional transmission line or series capacitors to the 60MW installation allows it to operate stably at the minimum 0.1s fault clearance time by increasing the stability margin.
This document discusses the stability of different power system configurations under faults.
Part 1 analyzes a 50MW installation and finds it is only stable for fault clearance times of 0.12s or less, which does not meet the minimum criteria of 0.1s.
Part 2 analyzes a 60MW installation and similarly finds it is only stable for fault clearance times of 0.14s or less, again not meeting the 0.1s minimum.
Parts 3-4 find that adding an additional transmission line or series capacitors to the 60MW installation allows it to operate stably at the minimum 0.1s fault clearance time by increasing the stability margin.
Figure 2 Shortest unstable fault clearance time- 0.13s This particular system is stable only if the fault clearance time is 0.12 seconds or less. Therefore this design is not appropriate since the criteria specify a minimum fault clearance time of 100ms.
Part 5.2 60 MW Installation
Figure 3 Longest unstable fault clearance time- 0.14s The system is stable only if the fault clearance time is 0.14 seconds or less as shown below. Therefore this design is not suitable since the criteria states a minimum fault clearance time of 100ms. Figure 4 Shortest unstable fault clearance time- 0.15s
During the two stables states, the system still absorbs the excess energy and consequently, the rotor angle decreases, whilst keeping synchronization between the generators. Amidst unstable conditions, the system fails to absorb the excess energy, the rotor angle continuously increases. This happens 1ms later than longest stable condition. A shift of power from 50MW to 60MW causes the minimum fault clearance time before the system becomes transiently unstable to be increased. According to the power angle relationship, if in a case where one line is out of service, it has a greater reactance and a lower electrical power capability. Therefore, a system with both lines in service could not be loaded to a level larger than the maximum power of one line out of service in case of a line outage. For the unstable states, the maximum power with both lines in service exceeded the maximum power for one line out of service.
According to the relationship illustrated by the diagram below, A 1 is proportional to the accelerating kinetic energy which is positive and A 2 is proportional to the decelerating kinetic energy which is denoted as negative. Equal area criteria dictates that area A 1 must be equal to area A 2 for the system to be transiently stable, that is, the system must have zero net acceleration energy. This was satisfied only up to a certain point for the system setups above. Reducing fault clearance time, reduces the accelerating energy, increasing the stability margin. So increasing fault clearance time decreased the stability margin, causing the system to become unstable.
Part 5.3 - 60MW Generation and Additional line
Figure 5. 60MW Generation and additional line 100ms clearance time condition The system is stable for a fault clearance time of 100ms with an additional line. With an added shorted line, the deceleration kinetic energy is increased. This increases the stability margin to increase power transfer. The system is said to have increased stability.
Part 5.4 - 60MW Generation and Series Capacitors
Figure 6 . 60MW Generation and Series Capacitors 100ms clearance time condition
The system is stable for a fault clearance time of 100ms when a capacitor is added in series. The capacitor reduces the reactance and consequently impedance. This causes a higher post fault clearance power angle curve. Together with the fact that the area, A 2 in the previous power angle curve diagrams were higher, it can be concluded that the decelerating energy and the stability margin has increased. Thus increasing the power transfer.