0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
27 vues4 pages
Guillain barre syndrome (GBS) is an acute immune mediated de-mylelinating poly-radiculoneuropathy. This study was carried out to analye the electro-physiological a!normalities in the first wee" of GBS in this region. Results: Slowing of motor conduction velocities, decreased amplitude and increased distal motor latencies () +) was seen in peroneal, ti!ial, median and
Guillain barre syndrome (GBS) is an acute immune mediated de-mylelinating poly-radiculoneuropathy. This study was carried out to analye the electro-physiological a!normalities in the first wee" of GBS in this region. Results: Slowing of motor conduction velocities, decreased amplitude and increased distal motor latencies () +) was seen in peroneal, ti!ial, median and
Guillain barre syndrome (GBS) is an acute immune mediated de-mylelinating poly-radiculoneuropathy. This study was carried out to analye the electro-physiological a!normalities in the first wee" of GBS in this region. Results: Slowing of motor conduction velocities, decreased amplitude and increased distal motor latencies () +) was seen in peroneal, ti!ial, median and
Volume 4 Issue 1 Research Ar ticle Open Access Neurology & Neurophysiology Geetanali et al!, J Neurol Neurophysiol 2"1#, 4:1 http:$$%&!%oi!or'$1"!41(2$2155- 9562!1"""142 R e s e a r c h A r t i c l e O p e n A c c e s s Early Electrodiagnostic Findings of Guillain Barre Syndrome Sharma Geetanjali 1 *, Sood Sushma 1 and Sharma Sudhir 2 1 Department of Physiology, University of Health Sciences, Haryana, India 2 Department of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Haryana, India Abstract Purpose: Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) is an acute immune mediated de-mylelinating poly-radiculo- neuropathy. As early diagnosis favors a good outcome after treatment, this study was carried out to analye the electro-physiological a!normalities in the first wee" of GBS in this region. Basic procedures: #he study was carried out for early confirmation of GBS in $% clinically diagnosed patients reporting within a wee" of muscle wea"ness !y electro-physiological tests in the years &'('-(&. Results: Slowing of motor conduction velocities, decreased amplitude and increased distal motor latencies ()*+) was seen in peroneal, ti!ial, median and ulnar nerves in descending order of severity. ,onduction !loc" was seen in the lower lim! in (' ((%.-./) patients. 0-wave was completely a!sent in upper and lower lim!s in %' (1$.2&/) patients while (% patients (&-.'1/) showed decreased 0-wave conduction velocity in !oth lim!s. Sensory conduction velocity of median nerve was less compared to sural. 3*G studies showed that demyelinating type of neuropathy was predominant (.-.--/). Discussion: 3lectro-physiological studies play an important role in the early detection4 characteriation 5 treatment of GBS !ecause timely intervention reduces mor!idity and disa!ility. 6ncreased )*+, a!sent 0- wave, decreased median with normal Sural S,7 (sensory conduction velocity) is diagnostic of early GBS. Keywords: Peripheral neuropathic weakness; Electro-diagnosis; Early signs Introduction GBS is an auto-immune mediated de-myelinating polyradiculo- neuropathy. Males females are e!ually at risk. "linical features include progressi#e$ symmetrical ascending muscle weakness of more than two lim%s$ arefle&ia with or without sensory$ autonomic and %rainstem a%normalities '(a%le )*. +eakness is prominent in leg muscles as compared to arms; there is a%sence of fe#er at the onset of neural symptoms. "ranial ner#e in#ol#ement may affect airway and facial muscles$ eye mo#ements and swallowing ,)-. .t usually presents with num%ness and tingling in the feet ,/-. .n )010$ 2aymaker and 3ernohan reported the histo-pathological features of 45 fatal cases of GBS. (he earliest features were edema of pro&imal ner#es followed %y degeneration of myelin sheath within the )st week of illness ,6-. Electro-diagnosis plays an important role in early detection and characteri7ation of inflammatory de-myelinating polyradiculopathies ,1-. 8er#e conduction a%normalities %ecome more prominent during the initial weeks of the disease e#en if patients clinical status sent to the 9epartment of Physiology for ner#e conduction. (he study was conducted on these :4 su%;ects '1/ males /6 females* %etween the age group of :-<5 years using =MS EMG EP Mark-.. "handigarh. (he criteria for clinical diagnosis of GBS were rapidly progressi#e lim% weakness with or without distal lim% paresthesias and reduced deep tendon refle&es. (he parameters considered were di#ided into four ma;or groups> ). Motor conduction studies included? Median$ ulnar$ ti%ial and peroneal conduction #elocities$ amplitude and their distal motor latencies. /. Sensory conduction studies included? Medial and sural ner#e conduction #elocities. 6. F wa#e studies? F wa#e studies included F wa#e conduction #elocity F wa#e latency. 'F wa#e is a late response resulting from antidromic acti#ation of motor neurons in#ol#ing conduction to and from spinal cord. F wa#e studies ha#e %een esta%lished as a #alua%le tool in clinical neuro-physiology ,0-. Prominent slowing of F wa#es has %een reported in GBS where the demyelination may affect the pro&imal segment of ner#e and e#en the roots which cannot %e assessed %y routine ner#e conduction studies ,)5-. is impro#ing ,4$:-. Early ner#e conduction findings include a%normal or a%sent F wa#es with low "8@PAs$ an a%normal upper e&tremity sensory ner#e action potential com%ined with normal sural response and multiple indirect discharges ,1$<$B-. Material and Methods Ethics committee appro#al? (here was no issue of ethical committee appro#al during this study as the patients were referred from department of Medicine of our .nstitute for electro-diagnostic e#aluation '(a%le /*. (he present study was carried out to facilitate early confirmation of clinically diagnosed cases of GBS in the )st week of illness that were J Neurol Neurophysiol ISSN: 2155-9562 JNN, an open Volume 4 Issue 1 *Corresponding author Geetan8ali Sharma, )epartment of 9hysiology, :niversity of ;ealth Sciences, ;aryana, 6ndia4 #el: 2((&$&&(-($4 3-mail: drgeeta(&(&<yahoo.co m Recei!ed =ovem!er &., &'(&4 Accepted )ecem!er &2, &'(&4 Published >anuary (%, &'(- Citation Geetan8ali S, Sushma S, Sudhir S (&'(-) 3arly 3lectrodiagnostic 0indings of Guillain Barre Syndrome. > =eurol =europhysiol ?: (?&. doi:('.?(1&@&(%%- 2%$&.('''(?& Cop"right A &'(- Geetan8ali S, et al. #his is an open-access article distri!uted under the terms of the ,reative ,ommons Attri!ution +icense, which permits unrestricted use, distri!ution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Citation Geetan8ali S, Sushma S, Sudhir S (&'(-) 3arly 3lectrodiagnostic 0indings of Guillain Barre Syndrome. > =eurol =europhysiol ?: (?&. doi:('.?(1&@&(%%-2%$&.('''(?& )a'e 2 o* # #ariables $o% o& patients *ales@females ?&@&- Age range $-1' AgeB$' %2 Cea"ness $%@$% ArefleDia %.@$% 'able 1 ,linical features in $% patients of GBS. #ariable $o ()* o& patients (. 0 waves A!normal, total a. :pper lim! A!sent %' (1$.2&/) 9rolonged latency (% (&-.'1/) =ormal ' !. +ower lim! A!sent %' (1$.2&/) 9rolonged latency (% (&-.'1/) =ormal ' &. S,7 a. :pper lim! =ormal %% (.?.$(/) )ecrease '% (1.$2/) A!sent '% (1.$2/) !. +ower +im! (Sural) =ormal ?' ($(.&2/) )ecrease &' (-'.1$/) A!sent % (1.$2/) -. ,*A9 (compound muscle action potential) A.,onduction velocity (,7) 5 amplitude a. :pper lim! )ecrease in !oth :lnar 5 median nerves ?? ($1.$/) )ecrease in only ulnar nerve . ((&.-/) =ormal ,7 (- (&'.(/) !. +ower lim! )ecrease in !oth ti!ial 5 peroneal nerves )ecrease in only ti!ial nerve %' (1$.2&/) % (1.$2/) ,onduction !loc" (' ((%.-./) B. )istal motor latency a. :pper lim! 6ncrease in !oth :lnar 5 median nerves ?& ($?/) 6ncrease in only ulnar nerve . ((&/) !. +ower lim! 6ncrease in !oth ti!ial 5 peroneal nerves %' (1$.2&/) 6ncrease in only ti!ial nerve % (1.$2/) ,onduction !loc" (' ((%.-./) ?. 3*G )emyelinating type $' (2&.-'/) ADonal type % (1.$2/) 'able 2 3lectro-diagnostic findings in patients with Guillain Barre Syndrome within ( wee". 1. EMG studies 'Electro-myographic studies*? "onducted in 9eltoid @%ductor digiti minimii 'Cpper Dim%* and (i%ialis anterior Peroneus longus muscles 'lower lim%*. Electro-diagnostic criteria @ccording to 9utch Guillain Barre study group criteria only one of the following a%normalities in at least two ner#es should %e considered ,))-. ). .ncreased distal motor latencyE)45F of upper limit of normal /. 9ecreased conduction #elocityG<5F of lower limit of normal 6. .ncreased F wa#e latencyE)45 of upper limit of normal 1. 9ecreased compound muscle action potential amplitudeEupper limit of normal. (he placement of electrodes was done on the %asis of the techni!ue descri%ed %y Mishra and 3alita ,)/-. Results Distal motor latency .ncreased distal motor latency '9MD* was seen in 1/ ':1F* patients for %oth ulnar median ner#es and e&clusi#ely for ulnar ner#e in B ')/F* patients. )4 '/6.5<F* patients had normal 9MD. Hn the case of the lower lim%s$ increased distal motor latency was seen in 45 '<:.0/F* patients for %oth ti%ial peroneal ner#es and e&clusi#ely for ti%ial ner#e in 4 '<.:0F* patients. Conduction velocity and amplitude 9ecreased conduction #elocity amplitude was seen in 11 ':<.:F* for %oth median ulnar ner#es and e&clusi#ely for ulnar ner#e in B ')/.6F* patients while )6 '/5.)F* patients had normal conduction #elocities .n lower lim%s$ decreased conduction #elocity amplitude was seen in 45 '<:.0/F* for %oth ti%ial peroneal ner#es and e&clusi#ely for ti%ial ner#e in 4 '<.:0F* patients. "onduction %lock was seen in the lower lim% in )5 ')4.6BF* patients. So$ slowing of motor conduction #elocities$ decreased amplitude as well as increase in distal motor latencies were o%ser#ed$ %eing more pronounced in the lower lim%s. -wave F-wa#e was completely a%sent in %oth upper and lower lim%s in 45 '<:.0/F* patients while )4 patients '/6.5<F* showed decreased conduction #elocity with prolonged latency and decreased amplitude in %oth upper and lower lim%s. !ensory nerve action potential 9ecreased sensory conduction #elocity 'S"I* was seen in 15 ':)./0F*$ a%sent S"I in /5 '65.<:F* and normal S"I in 4 '<.:0F* patients in the upper lim%. Hn the other hand$ normal Sural ner#e S"I ,SS"I- was seen in 44 'B1.:)F*$ decreased SS"I in 4 '<.:0F* and a%sent SS"I in 4 '<.:0F* patients in the lower lim%. So$ sensory conduction #elocity of median ner#e was slightly less as compared to Sural ner#e in lower lim%s. EM" EMG studies were carried out in 65 of the :4 patients of the GBS group$ of which /4 'B6.66F* showed demyelinating type of polyneuropathy with reduced #oluntary motor unit recruitment while the remaining 4 '):.::F* patients showed a&onal type of polyneuropathy showing dener#ation pattern. Discussion Electro-diagnostic studies are helpful in diagnosis and differentiating demyelinating #ariety of GBS which responds to treatment and has a %etter prognosis ,)6-. Electro-physiological hallmarks of early demyelination include prolonged distal motor latencies$ prolongedJa%sent F wa#e latencies mainly in the lower lim%s$ slow motor conduction #elocitiesJconduction %lock with a%sent F wa#e$ and a%normal upper e&tremity sensory ner#e action potential as compared to the sural ner#e. )a'e # o* # F wa#e is the most sensiti#e diagnostic test for early GBS. .n our study$ motor conduction #elocity was decreased and pro&imal conduction %lock was noticed mainly in the lower lim%s. (he a%o#e results are in tandem with findings of Gordon$ Kun 3imura and 3uwahara ,1$)5$)1-. .n a study done %y =opper et al. on 1) patients of GBS who underwent electro-diagnostic studies within a week of onset of symptoms$ ): patients had a%normalities of compound muscle action potentials including dispersion$ delayed latency$ low amplitude$ conduction #elocity slowing$ conduction %lock or a%normal F-wa#es ,)4-. Similar results ha#e %een !uoted %y "louston et al. ,):-. Prolonged distal motor latencies prolonged or a%sent F wa#es reflect early predilection for in#ol#ement of pro&imal spinal roots and distal motor terminals. Cpper lim% S8@PAs particularly of the median ner#e can %e affected more se#erely and earlier than those of the sural ner#e. (he e&planation of this finding is multifactorial. Entrapment sites are more prone i.e. median ner#e in "arpal (unnel. =educed S8@P amplitudes can %e the result of secondary a&onal degeneration and conduction %lock ,)<-. (he conduction %lock was ma&imal in the terminal segment in the upper and lower lim%s$ more so in the lower lim%. (hese findings were consistent with those of Brown ,)B-. 2e attri%uted %eing due to relati#e deficiency of the %lood ner#e %arrier. 9ecrease in conduction #elocity is damage to the myelin sheath; %oth cellular and immune mechanisms play important roles in it. Early inflammatory lesions consist of lymphocytic infiltrate; later on macrophages %ecome prominent. (he peripheral ner#e changes consist of peri#ascular oedema$ accumulation of mono-nuclear cells and para- nodal less commonly segmental demyelination ,)0-. (he EMG studies were conducted on 65 of the :4 patients %ecause of pro&imity of electro-diagnosis to the symptom onset. EMG studies showed that demyelinating type of neuropathy was the predominant form of GBS 'B6.66F* in our series. (his was in consistence with the results of Lakoo% et al. ,/5-. Conclusion (he glo%al incidence of Guillain Barre Syndrome has %een estimated %etween ).)J)55$555Jyear to ).BJ)55$555Jyear ,/)-. (hus$ this syndrome constitutes a ma;or load of demyelinating polyneuropathy cases worldwide. (here seems to %e a slight preponderance of @.9P 'acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy* #ariety in .ndia as suggested %y Gupta et al. and Meena et al. ,//$/6- @.9P was the preponderant #ariant in our study i.e. in the state of 2aryana. (he results were in line with the electro- diagnostic criteria for early diagnosis of GBS as descri%ed in literature. Electro-diagnostic techni!ues play an important role in the early detection and characteri7ation of inflammatory demyelinating poly-radiculopathy in the first week of symptomology and assume importance in treatment of this syndrome %ecause timely inter#ention reduces mor%idity and disa%ility. Ac+no,ledgements #he authors sincerely than" *r. Eandhir Singh, Senior +a!oratory #echnician, )epartment of 9hysiology, :niversity of ;ealth Sciences, for his untiring co- operation during nerve conduction studies of the patients. Re&erences (. ;auser S+, As!ury AF (&''2) Guillain-Barre Syndrome 5 other immune- mediated neuropathies: &$$1-&$1(. &. Amato AA (&''%) Guillain Barre syndrome 5 related disorders. Eev *eD =euroci $: ?%%- ?$2. -. ;ayma"er C, Fernohan >C ((2?2) #he +andry-Guillain-BarrG syndrome4 a clinicopathologic report of %' fatal cases and a critiHue of the literature. *edicine (Baltimore) &.: %2-(?(. ?. Gordon 9;, Cil!ourn A> (&''() 3arly electrodiagnostic findings in Guillain- BarrG syndrome. Arch =eurol %.: 2(--2(1. %. Al!ers >C ((2.2) AA3* ,ase report I?- Guillain Barre Syndrome (&: 1'%J1((. $. *c+eod >G ((22%) 6nvestigation of peripheral neuropathy. > =eurol =eurosurg 9sychiatry %.: &1?-&.-. 1. Eoth G, *agistris *E ((222) 6ndirect discharges as an early nerve conduction a!normality in the Guillain-BarrG syndrome. 3ur =eurol ?&: .--.2. .. Aminoff *>, Green!erg )A, Simon E9 (&''%) 6n ,linical =eurology. $th ed. *cGraw-;ill *edical, =ew Kor". 2. 0isher *A (&''&) ; refleDes and 0 wave fundamentals normal and a!normal patterns. =eurol ,lin = Am &': --2. ('. Fimura >, Buter >0 ((21%) 0-wave conduction velocity in Guillain-BarrG syndrome. Assessment of nerve segment !etween aDilla and spinal cord. Arch =eurol -&: %&?-%&2. ((. *eulstee >, 7an )er *eche 0G ((22%) 3lectrodiagnostic criteria for polyneuropathy and demyelination: application in (-% patients with Guillain- BarrG syndrome. )utch Guillain-BarrG Study Group. > =eurol =euro Surg 9sychiat %2: ?.&-?.$. (&. *ishra 7A, Falita > (&''$) ,linical =europhysiology, (&ndedn). 3lsevier ;ealth Sciences, Gurgaon: &-%. (-. =adir LF, =arullah * ((22.) 3lectrodiagnostic study of ?' cases presenting as Guillain Barre Syndrome. 9a" > =eurol ?: %'-%?. (?. Fuwa!ara S, Mgawara F, *io!uchi F, Foga *, *ori *, et al. (&''') 6solated a!sence of 0 waves and proDimal aDonal dysfunction in Guillain-BarrG syndrome with antiganglioside anti!odies. > =eurol =eurosurg 9sychiatry $.: (2(-(2%. (%. Eopper A;, Ci8dic"s 30, Shahani B# ((22') 3lectrodiagnostic a!normalities in ((- consecutive patients with Guillain-BarrG syndrome. Arch =eurol ?1: ..(- ..1. ($. ,louston 9), Fiers +, Luniga G, ,ros ) ((22?) Nuantitative analysis of the compound muscle action potential in early acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. 3lectroencephalogr ,lin =europhysiol 2-: &?%-&%?. (1. Amato AA, )umitru ) (&''&) AcHuired neuropathies. 6n: )umitru ), Amato AA, Lwarts *>. 3ditor. 3lectrodiagnostic medicine, (&ndedn). 9hiladelphia: ;anley 5 Belfus, 6nc: 2-1J('?(. (.. Brown C0, Snow E ((22() 9atterns and severity of conduction a!normalities in Guillain-BarrG syndrome. > =eurol =eurosurg 9sychiatry %?: 1$.-11?. (2. Eamachandran #S, +oreno =K (&'(() Acute 6nflammatory )emyelinating 9olyradiculoneuropathy. &'. Ka"oo! *K, Eahman A, >amil B, Syed =A (&''%) ,haracteristics of patients with Guillain Barre Syndrome at a tertiary care centre in 9a"istan, (22%-&''-. > 9a" *ed Assoc %%: ?2--?2$. &(. *cGrogan A, *adle G,, Seaman ;3, de 7ries ,S (&''2) #he epidemiology of Guillain-BarrG syndrome worldwide. A systematic literature review. =euroepidemiology -&: (%'-($-. &&. Gupta ), =air *, Baheti ==, Sarma 9S, Furuvilla A, et al. (&''.) )iplomate- American Board (&''.) 3lectrodiagnostic and clinical aspects of Guillain-BarrG syndrome: an analysis of (?& cases. > ,lin =euromuscul )is (': ?&-%(. &-. *eena AF, Fhadil"ar S7, *urthy >* (&'(() #reatment guidelines for Guillain- BarrG Syndrome. Ann 6ndian Acad =eurol. Citation Geetan8ali S, Sushma S, Sudhir S (&'(-) 3arly 3lectrodiagnostic 0indings of Guillain Barre Syndrome. > =eurol =europhysiol ?: (?&. doi:('.?(1&@&(%%-2%$&.('''(?&