Record On Appeal For Article 78 FOIL Action

NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK'S INDEX NO.
1 00220/2013
NEW YORK SUPREME COURT

APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST DEPARTMENT
In the Matter of
THE LAW OFFICES OF ADAM D. PERLMUTTER, P.C., for a

Judgment Pursuant to Article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and
Rules
Petitioner-Respondent,
- against-
NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, and RAYMOND

KELLY, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the New York
City Police Department,
Respondents-Appellants.
RECORD ON APPEAL
ZACHARY W. CARTER,
Corporation Counsel of the
City of New Yark,
Attorney for Respondents-Appellants,
100 Church Street,
New York, New York 10007.
(212) 356-2500
@law.nyc.gov
LAW OFFICE OF ADAM D. PERLMUTTER, P.C.,

Daniel A. McGuinness, Esq.,
Attorney for Petitioner-Respondent,
260 Madison Avenue, Suite 1800,
(212) 679-1990
Reproduced on Recycled Paper

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pre-Argument Statement in Lieu of

Statement Pursuant to CPLR 5531 1
Respondents' Notice of Appeal, dated October 29,2013 5
Order Appealed from and Memorandum Decision

of the Honorable Doris Ling-Cohan,
Dated October 17,2013 and Entered October 23,2013 7
Notice of Verified Petition, Dated January 31,2013 20
Verified Petition, Sworn to January 29,2013,

with Annexed Exhibits 23
Exhibit A - NYPD Highway Patrol Procedural Guide 39
Exhibit B - Trial Transcript in People v. Lopresti,

Dated May 26,2011 143
Exhibit C - Article, Dated March 2006,

Titled "Demystifying The Intoxilyzer 5000
by Mary Catherine McMurray 244
Exhibit D - Diagnostic Test Results 269
Exhibit E- Calibration check printout sheet 271
Exhibit F - NYPD Field Unit Inspection Report 273
Exhibit G - NYPD Field Unit Inspection Report 275
Exhibit H - NYPD Calibration Report,

Dated December 3, 2011 277
Exhibit I - Police Department Certification of

Records by Gami1 Hanna 279
Exhibit J - Intoxilyzer 5000 Operator's Manual 281
Exhibit K- Printout reflecting the readings of

the calibration checks 314
11
Exhibit L - Inhibited RFI printout.. 316
Exhibit M - Interferent detected and

subtracted printouts 318
Exhibit N- Invalid Sample Printout 321
Exhibit 0 - Invalid Test Printout 323
Exhibit P - Insufficient Sample Printout 325
Exhibit Q- NYPD Maintenance Log for each

Intoxilyzer 5000EN machine
Operated in the City 327
Exhibit R - Excerpt of Transcript, Dated July 23,2012,

in People v. Alvarado 330
Exhibit S - Examples from the Alcohol Testing Program,

Florida Department of
Law Enforcement Website 342
Exhibit T - Letter, Dated August 30, 2012,

from Daniel A. McGuinness to Records
Access Officer NYC Police Department,
with Supporting Documents 347
Exhibit U - Affidavit of Service, Sworn to August 31, 2012 371
Exhibit V - Letter, Dated September 20, 2012, from Richard

Mantellino, to NYPD FOIL Unit. 373
Exhibit W - Letter, Dated September 25,2012,

from Daniel A. McGuninness
to Jonathan David 376
Exhibit X - USPS return receipt card and website tracking information ....... 379
Exhibit Y - Letter, Dated December 3,2012, from

Jonathan David to Daniel A. McGuinness 382
Exhibit Z - Letter, Dated October 15, 1980,

from Robert J. Freeman to Susan Marie Tatro 384
III
Amended Verified Answer,

Sworn to May 2,2013, with Annexed Exhibits 389
Exhibit A - Letter, Dated August 30, 2012,

Access Officer NYC Police Department .411
(reproduced supra pp. 347-350)
Exhibit B - Letter, Dated September 20, 2012, from Richard

Mantellino, to NYPD FOIL Unit.. .412
Exhibit C - Letter, Dated September 25,2012,

to Jonathan David .413
Exhibit D - Letter, Dated December 3,2012, from

Jonathan David to Daniel A. McGuinness .416
Exhibit E- Sample of Calibration check printout.. .417
Exhibit F - Sample ofIntemal Diagnostic check printout .419
Exhibit G - Sample of Police Laboratory Field Unit Inspection Report ....... .421
Exhibit H - Sample of Diagnostic check printout. .423
Exhibit I - Sample of Calibration Report .425
Exhibit J - Sample of an Insufficient Sample Test printout .427
Exhibit K - RFI test printout.. .429
Exhibit L - Police Laboratory Calibration Report .431
Exhibit M - Invalid Sample printouts .433
Exhibit N - "Interferent Detected" printout .435
Exhibit 0 - Invalid Test printout .437
Exhibit P - Affinnation of Joseph A. McConnack, Dated May 2, 2013 .439

IV
Page
Exhibit Q - Affirmation of Jill Hoexter, Dated May 2, 2013 .445
Exhibit R - Affirmation of Adam Silberlight, Dated May 2, 2013 .448
Exhibit S- Affirmation of Karen Rankin, Dated May 2, 2013 .451
Exhibit T- Affirmation of Craig Esswein, Dated May 2, 2013 .454
Statement of No Other Opinion 457
Certification Pursuant to CPLR 2105 458

PRE-ARGUMENT STATEMENT IN LIEU OF
STATEMENT PURSUANT TO CPLR 5531
(pp. 1-4)
REPRODUCED FOLLOWING
2
APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
~-~---------~---------------------------------------------------------x
In the Matter of
THE LAW OFFICES OF

ADAM D. PERLMUTTER, P.c., Index No. 100220/2013
Petitioner-Appellee;
For a Judgment Pursuant to Article 78

of the Civil Practice Law and Rules
-against- PRE-ARGUMENT
STATEMENT
NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT,
and RAYMOND KELLY, in his official capacity as
Commissioner of the New York City Police Department,
Respondents-Appellants.
-------------------------------------~------------~-------~-----------x
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that the Responden'ts-AppellantS, for their pre-
argument statement, allege as follows:
1. ' The full names of the original parties, and the names, addresses and
telephone numbers of counsel for the parties, are as set forth below:
Petitioner-Respondent: THE LAW OFFICES OF THE LAW OFFICES OF,

ADAM D. PERLMUTTER, P.C.
Attorneys for
Petitioner-Respondent: Law Offices of Adam D. Perlmutter, P.C.
260 Madison Avenue, Suite 1800
New York, NY 10016
(212) 679-19.90
Respondents-Appellants: NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and

RAYMOND KELLY, in his official capacity as
Commissioner of the New York City Police Pepartment
3
Attorneys for
Respondent-Appellant: Michael A. Cardozo
Corporation Counsel of the City of New York
100 Church Street
New York, New York 10007
(212) 356-0800
2. In this proceeding commenced under Article 78 of the CPLR, Petitioner-
Respondent challenged the detennination of the Respondents-Appellants to deny Petitioner-
Appellant access to documents requested pursuant to the New York Freedom of Infonnation
Law, N.Y. Pub. Off. Law § ~4, et seq.
3. Appeal is taken from that portion of the Decision, Order and Judgment of
Justice Doris Ling-Cohan dated October 17, 2013 and entered in the office of the Clerk of New
York County on October 23,2013, pursuant to which Justice Ling-Cohan found that the subject
documents were not exempt (a) pursuant to N.Y. Public Officers Law §87(2)(e)(i) as law
enforcement records, the disclosure of which would interfere ~th a judicial proceeding, or (b)
pursuant to N.Y. Public Officers Law §87(2)(a), as documents which are specifically exempted
from disclosure by state statute, namely N.Y. Criminal Procedure Law §240.20(1)(k). Appeal
also is taken from that portion of the Decision, Order and Judgment which awarded Petitioner-
Appellant attorneys' fees and costs.
4. The grounds for appeal are that the Court erred in finding that disclosure
of records perta,ining to the calibration and maintenarice of Intoxilyzer 5000EN machines owned
(
or maintained by the New York City Police Department NYFD from January 2008 until August
2012 would not expand the scope of pennissible discovery in thousands of pending criminal
DUIIDWI prosecutions throughout New York City in providing broader and earlier access to
records under the Freedom of Infonnation Law than otherwise pennitted to criminal defendants
pursuant to N.Y. Criminal Procedure Law §240.20(l)(k) and, thus, (i) would not interfere with
2
4
judicial proceedings by usurping the authority of criminal court judges .to manage pre-trial
discovery in DUIIDWI prosecutions brought before them, and on that basis was not exempt
pursuant to N.Y. Public Officers Law §87(2)(e)(i), and (ii) would not require disclosure of
records that are not discoverable under N.Y. Criminal Procedure Law §240.20(1)(k), and on that
basis was not exempt pursuant to N.Y. Public Officers Law §87(2)(a). The Court further erred in
finding that Petitioner-Appellant was entitled to an award of attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to
N.Y. Public Offi~ers Law §89(4)(c), although Petitioner-Appellant is proceeding pro se.
Dated: New York, New York

October 28, 2013
MICHAEL A. CARDOZO
Corporation Counsel of the City ofNew York
Attorney for Respondents-Appellants
100 Church Street
(212) 356.2~OO 1./ ~
By: ~'f'
Leonard Koerner
Chief, Appeals Division
J
5
RESPONDENTS' NOTICE OF APPEAL, DATED OCTOBER 29,2013

(pp.5-6)
6
~,UPREME COURTOF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
---------~-------------------------------------------------------------)(
In the Matter of
THE LAW OFFICES OF ADAM D. PERLMUTTER, P.C., NOTICE OF APFEAL r
Petitioner, Index No.IO0220IfJ~DLf)
_-'0/.;',',
For a judgment Pursuant to Article 78 of the Civil
Practice Law and Rules,
-against- ~~~,
~t\'i .",
~~:gr:~Ir~~~~~;o~~~~::i~:'and ~t'\ '/. ~ ~ .' ~,
Commissioner of the New York City Police ~:::::~. .~ . ' '.'
------------------------------------------------------------)( ;..,.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that respondents appeal to the Appellate Divi~ion of
the Supreme Court, First Department, from the decision order and jJ.idgment (one paper) of the
Hon. Doris Ling-Cohan, herein dated October 17, 2013 and entered in the office of the Clerk of
New York County on or about October 23,2013. This appeal is taken from each and every part
of said decision order and judgment (one paper) as well as from the whole thereof.

October 29,2013
MICHAEL A. CARDOZO
Corporation Counsel
Attorney for Respondents,
100 Church Street
(212) 356-2500
, By:
LEONARD KOERNER
Chief, Appeals Division
TO: LA W OFFICES OF ADAM D. PERLMUITER, P.C.,

AttoI1;leys for Petitioner,
260 Madison Avenue, Suite 1800
(212) 679-1990
CLERK
County of New York
7
ORDER APPEALED FROM AND MEMORANDUM DECISION

OF THE HONORABLE DORIS LING-COHAN,
DATED OCTOBER 17, 2013 AND ENTERED OCTOBER 23,2013
(pp.7-19)
8
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

NEW YORK COUNTY
PRESENT:
. DORIS t'NG..cOHAN PART 3'
J;S:.C.
Justice
~ ~ oq;-'~.s .F 4JtI#M "Do R,.,.J",II!k"i Pc.

-v· MonON DATE _
New y.,4: r:,,°lct A I ~,cf P;i-! ~ Q. MonON SEQ. NO. _
The f.,,,,"", pa..... "umb.... 1 to L .w.re rea' ou tbIs mot"," toIfor ~ i:4 71J
~ Affidavits - exhibits (..,.. I\ll e~ I NO(al'_-v-G-=1~ _ _
Answering Affidavits - '(
Notice of Motion/Order to Show Cause
Exhlb ~ +- ... ~....)~ . . I No(s)..3
Replying Affidavits
/~~,Mt>r~ M- W
_~ )
-s167n -
_
Upon the foregoing papers, It Is ordered that this metlen 18' ~"'t:-.4.
. I No(s). ----:;...--
~
r-dl;oro~j
'2.'
_
/ s c;n;.Y?ftt:f' /17 ~r~~ ·V~

~~/ ~,nrJ-r-r-'t~~ . ~~
w
(J
j::::
(I)
..,
::J
oI-
@
0::
0::
w
1.1,;
w
0:: ..
~§:
..J Z
::l 0
en
1.1,;
t;~
w 0::
l:ieJ
w Z
o::~
~o
w:f
(1)0
~ L&.
ZW
0::1:
_ t-
bO::
~~
UNG..coHAN
Dated: /0-/"9-/l3 J:9.C~ J.S.C.
1. CHECK ONE: ~ CASE DISPOSED o NON·FINAL DISPOSITION

2. C_HECK AS APPROPRLI\TE: MOTION IS: 0 GRANTED 0 DENIED o GRANTED IN PART 0 OTHER
3. CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: 0 SEITlE ORDER D SUBMIT ORDER
000 NOT POST D FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT 0 REFERENCE
9

COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 36
In the Matter of
THE LA W OFFICES OF ADAM D.
PERLMUTTER, P.C.,
Petitioner,
For a Judgment Pursuant to Article 78 of the

Civil Practice Law and Rules,
INDEX NUMBER 100220/2013
-against- Motion Sequence 001
DECISION, ORDER &

NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, and JUDGMENT
RAYMOND KELLY, in his official capacity as
Commissioner of the New York City Police .."
Department, ::J:
Respondents.
o
..
.r-
Ul
DORIS LING-COHAN, J.:
Petitioner, the Law Offices of Adam D. Perlmutter, petitions this court for a judgment,
pursuant to CPLR Article 78, compeUing respondents to produce documents requested in
petitioner's Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request, dated August 30, 20 I2.
Factual Background
Petitioner is a New York City-based law firm that, among other matters, handles criminal
and civil litigation concerning impaired driving of a motor vehicle and driving under the
influence (DUI). Respondent New York City Police Department (NYPD) uses breathalyzer
machines to determine a subject's blood alcohol level. A subject may not voluntarily substitute a
blood or urine sample. A blood or urine test may be administered at NYPD's discretion. See
Petition, exhibit A, Highway District Intoxilyzer SOOOEN LD.T.U. Procedure Guide at 9.
Statutory penalties in New York City are based on the breath test readings. See Vehicle and
Traffic Law §§ 1192 and 1195.
According to the petition, NYPD maintains 28 Intoxilyzer SOOOEN model machines
(lntoxilyzer) in six police precincts around the city, and at NYPD's laboratory. Petition, ~~ 15-
10
I ~
.. 16. A subject arrested for DUI is taken to one of these locations for testing. Id. at ~18. The
Intoxilyzer uses infrared spectrophotometry, where the alcohol content of a breath sample is
measured by the passage of infrared light through it. ld. at'19.
On August 30, 2012, petitioner, pursuant to FOIL, requested "copies of all calibration and
maintenance records for all Intoxilyzer 5000EN machines owned or maintained by the NYPD for
the last five years (beginning January 2008 until the present)," Petition, exhibit T. On September
20,2012, defendants denied the FOIL request as disclosure "would interfere with law
enforcement investigations or judicial proceedings", citing New York's Public Officers Law
("POL") §87(2)(e)(i). ld., Exhibit V. Petitioner appealed, in a letter dated September 25, 2012.
ld., exhibit W. Petitioner's appeal was denied on December 3, 2012. ld., Exhibit Y. The
parties took no further action until the filing of the instant petition on January 30, 2013.
Legal Standards
In this Article 78 proceeding, the question is raised as to "whether a detennination was
made in violation of lawful pr~cedure, was affected by an error of law or was arbitrary and
capricious or an abuse of discretion, including abuse of discretion as to the measure or mode of
penalty or discipline imposed." CPLR 7803 (3). "Judicial review of a discretionary
administrative determination is limited to deciding whether the agency's actions were arbitrary
and capricious. The agency's determination must be upheld if the record shows a rational basis
for it, even where the court might have reached a contrary result!' Matter ofKaplan v Bratton,
249 AD2d 199,201 (1st Dept 1998) (citation omitted); see also Matter ofChinese Staff &
Workers' Assn. v Burden, 88 AD3d 425,.429 (Ist Dept 2011) (''It is not the role of the court to
weigh the desirability of the proposed action or to choose among alternatives, resolve
disagreements among experts, or to substitute its judgment for that of the agency"), affd 19 NY3d
922 (2012).
2
11
.. FOIL, New York's Public Officers Law § 84 et seq., provides for "access to the records
of government." It covers
"any infonnation kept, held, filed, produced or reproduced by, with or for an agency or
the state legislature, in any physical fonn whatsoever including, but not limited to,
reports, statements, examinations, memoranda, opinions, folders, files, books, manuals l
pamphlets, fonns, papers, designs, drawings, maps, photos, letters, microfJ.lms, computer
tapes or discs, rules, regulations or codes."
Public Officers Law § 86 (4).
Certain limits are placed on disclosure, such as shielding collective bargaining
negotiations, confidential law enforcement investigations, and trade secrets. See e.g. Public
Officers Law §§ 87 (2) (c), (2) (d) and (2) (e) (iii). Public Officers Law §87(2), cited to by
respondent in its denial letter [Petition, Exh. V], specifically states in pertinent part, as follows:
[e]ach agency shall, in accordance with its published rules, make available for
public inspection and copying all records, except that such agency may deny
access to records or portions thereof that:
(e) are compiled for law enforcement purposes and which, if disclosed, would:
(i) interfere with law enforcement investigations or judicial proceedings.
The public agency has the burden of proving that the requested record falls within the
listed exceptions. Public Officers Law § 89 (4) (b).' The public agency is required to either
produce the requested record, deny the request in Writing or "furnish a written acknowledgement
of the receipt of such request and a statement of the approximate date, which shall be reasonable
under the circumstances of the request, when such request will be granted or denied," within five
days of receipt of the request. Public Officers Law § 89 (3) (a).
A denial of a record request may be appealed within thirty days, and the public agency
"shall within ten business days of the receipt of such appeal fully explain in writing to the person
requesting the record the reasons for further denial, or provide access to the record sought."
Public Officers Law § 89 (4) (a).
3
12
Discussion
Petitioner contends that respondents' responses to his FOIL request and his appeal of its
denial were untimely under law. Public Officers Law § 89 (3) (a) requires the public agency to
reply within five days, no matter whether it is granting, denying or furnishing a written
acknowledgement of receipt and a statement of the approximate date when a final determination
will be made. Here, respondents answered petitioner's August 30, 2013 request on September
20,2012,21 days from the request. The appeal was filed on September 25,2012. The appeal
was denied on December 2, 2012,69 days later. Each time span was outside of the statutory
guidelines.
Respondents do not displ.lte the length oftime they took to respond to petitioner's FOIL
request and his appeal of its denial. Rather, they assert that their "denial of Petitioner's FOIL
request was lawful and proper in every respect and m~dated by law." Amended Verified
Answer (Answer), , 108. This statement is incorrect in that the initial denial and the denial of
the appeal were late under ~atute, and the responses made no effort to explain, or even
acknowledge, respondents' conduct in this regard. However, a delay in responding to a FOIL
request or an appeal of its denial is generally treated the same as a denial of the. request or the
appeal. Matter ofNew York Times Co. v CitypfN.Y. Police Dept., 103 AD3d 405, 406 (Ist Dept
2013) ("The FOIL requester's statutory remedy for an untimely response or ruling is to deem the
response a denial and commence a CPLR article 78 proceeding ..."). Respondents' delays did
not significantly prejudice petitioner, as the commencing of1he instant Article 78 proceeding was
not impeded.
Respondents' denial of the initi~ FOIL request stated that the "records/information, if
disclosed would interfere with law enforcement investigations or judicial proceedings,"
insulating them under Public Officers Law § 87 (2) (e) (i). The denial of petitioner's appeal
broadened the grounds for the denial to include protection of non-routine "criminal investigative
4
13
..
techniques or procedures," citing Public Officers Law § 87 (2) (e) (iv); protection of intra-agency
records "cont3ln[ing] preliminary data and information," citing Public Officers Law § 87 (2) (g)
(i); and "disclosure to just one party would interfere with the ordinary course of court-supervised
discovery and deprive other parties of their right to a fair trial or impartial adjudication in
ongoing litigation," citing Public Officers Law § 87 (2) (e) (i) and (ii).
In support of their opposition to the instant petition, respondents submit affmnations from
several prosecutors. Joseph A. McCormack (McCormack), chief of the Vehicular Crimes Bureau
in the office of the District Attorney, Bronx County, correctly states that New York Criminal
Procedure Law (CPL) § 240.20 (1) (k) requires a prosecutor to provide a criminal defendant only
with the most recent calibration or inspection of the Intoxilyzer instrument along with the test
results. Answer, exhibit P. McCormack contends that "records older than the most recent
calibration and maintenance records," as requested, "would most likely be denied under Crim.
Pro. Law § 240.20 (1) (k), if made in the context ofa criminal proceeding." Id., ~ 10.
Additionally, he claims that such disclosure "would clearly usurp the criminal court judge's
authority to determine the scope of discovery in specific prosecutions then-pending and to be
brought before the criminal court." Id., ~ 11. He estimates that there are approximately 1,000
criminal prosecutions in the Bronx involving the use of an Intoxilyzer that might, therefore, be
interfered with, by disclosure of documents or information otherwise excluded by CPL § 240.20
(1) (k). Id., mr 15-16.

Jill Hoexter (Hoexter), an assistant district attorney in the office of the District Attorney,
New York County, estimates that there are approximately 1,300 pending criminal prosecutions in
Manhattan involving the use of an Intoxilyzer. Answer, exhibit Q, ~ 6. Hoexter does not draw
any conclusions about the possible impact of the instant petition on pending criminal
5
14
o
..
prosecutions. Adam Silberlight (Silberlight), an assistant district attorney in the office ofthe
District Attorney, Richmond County, estimates that there are approximately 300 criminal
prosecutions in Staten Island involving the use of an Intoxilyzer. Answer, exhibit R, , 6. He
also offers no opinion about the instant petition. Karen Rankin (Rankin), an assistant district
attorney in the office ofthe District Attorney, Queens County, estimates that there are over 800
criminal prosecutions in Queens involving the use of an Intoxilyzer. Answer, exhibit 8, ~ 6.
Rankin offers no opinion about the instant petition. Craig Esswein, an assistant district attorney
in the office of the District Attorney, Kings County, estimates that there are over 700 criminal
prosecutions in Brooklyn involving the use of an Intoxilyzer, without commenting on the instant
petition. Answer, exhibit T, , 6. Hoexter, Silberlight, Rankin and Esswein all have had
substantial experience and responsibility in prosecuting crimes related to the operation ofa motor
vehicle following the conswnption of alcohoL Unlike McConnack, these assistant district
attorneys do not explicitly raise the issue of
"interfere[nce] with the criminal courts' ability to manage the orderly conduct of
their own cases and, in particular, would usurp the ability of criminal court judges
to manage pre-trial discovery and would undoubtedly unnecessarily burden these
courts with issues relating to the admissibility of documents which might
otherwise have been unavailable through discovery."
McCormack affinnation, , 16.
Respondents' key objection to disclosme of calibration and maintenance records for all of
NYPD's Intoxilyzers is the potential interference with law enforcement investigations or judicial
proceedings. Their argument follows a line of reasoning that seems very broadly based:
Intoxilyzers are used in determining a suspect's blood alcohol level; criminal charges and
penalties are tied to a suspect's blood alcohol levels; production of general information about
Intoxilyzers interferes with criminal law enforcement, although information about a specific
6
15
tJ
..
instrument in a specific case does not. Respondents contend that this "generic detennination"
(Memorandum of Law at 2), is supported by several cases, citing, not~bly: Matter ofPittari v
Pirro, 258 AD2d 202 (2d Dept 1999) (Pittarz); Matter afLegal Aid Socy. v New York City Police
Dept., 274 AD2d 207 (1st Dept 2000) (Legal Aid Society); Matter ofLesher v Hynes, 19 NY3d
57 (2012) (Lesher).
Upon examination, the authority cited proves to be of limited use for respondents'
purposes. When the defense attorney in the Pittari murder case sought essentially all records
obtained in connection with the homicide investigation, the district attorney refused, claiming a
blanket exemption under Public Officers Law § 87 (2) (e) (i). The trial court held that a district
attorney may assert a blanket exemption under Public Officers Law § 87 (2) (e) (i) to all material
compiled in connection with the investigation of a crime and the pending prosecution ofthat
crime. The Second Department found, on appeal, that "it is a;pparent that FOIL disclosure of
materials pertaining to the arrest and prosecution of a defendant in a pending criminal proceeding
would interfere with the adjudication of the criminal proceeding." Pittari, 258 AD2d at 207.
When criminal defendants awaiting trial requested documents relating to their charges in
Legal Aid Society, including complaint report worksheets, complaint follow-up reports, arrest
reports, activity log entries and arrest photos, NYPD refused the requests, relying upon Public
Officers Law § 87 (2) (e) (i), protecting material compiled in connection with the investigation of
a crime, and Public Officers Law § 87 (2) (t), protecting material that, if disclosed would
endanger the life or safety of a person. On appeal, the First Department affmned the denial of
the FOIL reques~. "We also agree with the Second Department's holding in Pittarithat 'a
generic determination' could be made that disclosure under FOIL of documents pertaining to a
petitioner's arrest and prosecution would interfere with the pending criminal proceeding." Legal
7
16
..
Aid Society, 274 AD2d at 214.
Lesher's fact pattern differs significantly from these cases, because the petitioner had no
connection to the underlying legal matter. Petitioner, an independent attorney and author, made a
FOIL request in 1998 for records pertaining to the case in which, in 1984, a man accused of
sexual abuse fled to Israel, beyond the reach ofthe United States's extradition power. The Kings
County District Attorney provided materials, some with redactions. In 2007, petitioner made a
second FOIL request in the matter for records from 1993 to the present. TIlls time, the district
attorney denied the request and the appeal on the grounds of Public Officers Law § 87 (2) (e) (i)-
(iv), emphasizing interference with law enforcement investigations or judicial proceedings. The
trial court,granted the petition with some qualifications. On appeal, the Court of Appeals
affirmed the Appellate Division's dismissal ofthe petition, stating that the "Appellate Division in
Pittari and Legal Aid Society adopted the [blanket or generic exemption to a pending case]
analysis when interpreting Public Officers Law § 87 (2) (e) (i), as do we." Lesher, 19 NY3d at
67. The Court of Appeals held that disclosure "posed an obvious risk of prematurely tipping the
District Attorney's hand." Id. at 67-68. This was not an idle concern because the suspect faced
an extradition proceeding in Israel when the second petition was filed. The District Attorney's
denial ofthe FOIL request then subscribed to the law.
The subsequent detennination by the Israel Supreme Court that barred extradition of the
suspect was no reason to now decide otherwise, according to the Court of Appeals. However, it
recognized that petitioner
"is free to make another FOIL request for the correspondence and
communications that he sought in this proceeding, based on the intervening Israeli
judicial decision. Ifhe is correct in his assessment of the decision's effect - a
matter for the FOIL records access officer to consider in the first instance - there
is, practically speaking, no longer any pending or potential law enforcement
8
17
.'
. ,
investigation or judicial proceeding with which disclosure might interfere. Public

Officers Law § 87 (2) (e) (i) would not preclude release of the records."
Id. at 68.
Lesher, one of the latest and the most authoritative rulings in this subject area, still
addresses the generic or blanket exemption for specific potential law enforcement investigations
orjudicial proceedings, akin to the other cases cited, and many other similar ones. The instant
petition, by contrast, is unr~lated to any potential law enforcement investigation or judicial
proceeding, that is, any identifiable, specific or known potential law enforcement investigation or
judicial proceeding. Rather, it addresses test equipment used day-in and day-out to measure
suspects' blood al'cohol content, which may, thereby, exonerate suspects or, at least, deter any
criminal prosecution on the grounds of driving under the influence, In essence, respondents'
reasoning that if an examination ofNYPD's Intoxilyzers leads to their abandonment, or a
dramatic change in their use, then there might, arguably, be interference with potential law
enforcement investigations or judicial proceedings.
However, petitioner's position is bolstered by the dicta in Lesher that opens the door to
disclosure when there is "no longer any pending or potential law enforcement investigation or
judicial proceeding with which disclosure might interfere." [d. There are admittedly no pending
specific law enforcement investigations or judicial proceedings at issue in this petition, unlike
Pittari and Legal Aid Society. The several thousand pending cases referenced by the various
prosecutors above would not be disturbed by granting this petition, since the suspects/defendants
involved already have the right to the most pertinent Intoxilyzer information particular to their
case, under CPL § 240.20 (1) (k).
Assuming the petition is granted and a wealth of infonnation regarding the Intoxilyzers is
9
18
.. .
made public, there are two outcomes: all equipment proves to be accurate and well-maintained;
or, not all equipment proves to be accurate and well-maintained. The first outcome will not
interfere with law enforcement investigations or judicial proceedings; it may even have the
salutary effect of bolstering confidence in the handling of Dill cases. The second outcome, the
discovery offaulty or defective equipment, can only be in the public interest in preventing
improper prosecutions. Such an outcome should not be the sort that a public agency cites to, in
order to protect its records from disclosure. That would be an arbitrary and capricious
determination, and fail under CPLR 7803 (3).
Respondents' expressed concern as to potentially burdeninglhampering crinlinal court
judges with the effects of such FOIL disclosure is misplaced as such disclosure, in fact, may
reduce the number of applications for disclosure. Further, rulings on whether such disclosed
materials are admissible would not "burden" criminal court judges in most cases, as the
governing evidentiary rules are clear. In any event, the effect of such disclosure is too
speculative to bar the disclosure of the records sought.
For the reasons above, the petition is granted, and defendants shall comply with the FOIL
disclosure request of August 3D, 2012, within 30 days of receipt of a copy ofthis order.
Petitioner's request for an award of attorneys' fees in its favor is granted, as pennitted by Public
Officers Law §89(4)(c), as respondent failed to timely respond to petitioner's FOIL request See
Matter ofLegal Aid Society v. New York State Dept. ofCorr. & Community Supervision, 105
AD3d 1120 (3re! Dept 2013); In the Matter ofNew York Civil Liberties Union v. City ofSaratoga
Springs, 87 AD3d 336 (3 rd Dept 2011). The court notes that respondents failed to supply case
law in support of their argument that legal fees should be denied because petitioner law finn
appeared in this proceeding pro se.
10
19
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED and ADmDGED that the Petition is granted, and defendants shall
comply with the FOIL disclosure request of August 30,2012, concerning all calibration and
maintenance records for all Intoxilyzer 5000EN machines owned or maintained by the NVPD for
the last five years (beginning January 2008 until the present), within 30 days of receipt of a copy
of this order with notice ofentry; and it is further
ORDERED that, with respect to attorneys' fees, within 60 days of entry of this
decision/order, petitioner is directed to submit an accounting of its costs/attorneys' fees, by
affidavit/affirmation, setting forth the hours expended, nonnal hourly rate charged, years of
expe~ience of co~sel etc, and respondents are directed t9 review such accounting and, should they
agree with such costs/fess, reimburse petitioner for such costs/fees, within 30 days from receipt of
the accounting; alternatively, within 30 days of receipt of the accounting, respondents shall
provide petitioner, by affidavit/affirmation, specific reasons for their disagreement within such
accounting. If the parties are Wlable to agree on the amount of the costs/fees, the parties shall meet
and confer to resolve such issue. Ifunable to resolve within 30 days of their meeting, either side
shall file a motion to determine such costs/fees, with a copy ofthis order attached, within 150 days
of entry of this order, which, upon final submission, may be referred to a Special Referee to hear
and determine, in accordance with CPLR 4317(b)1; and it is further
ORDERED that within 30 days of entry of this order, petitioner shall serve a copy
upon respondents, with notice ofentry.
DATED: October 17 , 2013

Doris Ling-Cohan, J.S.c. ~
J:\Article 78\Perlmutter Art 78.gotthelf.wpd
r
d ~
Failure to comPlFafb'f:ef!' "fl!iver or defaul' ~'T. clai ,as appropriate.
OCT 23 2013 11
COUNTY CLER!(
NEWYf..J,;,
20
NOTICE OF VERIFIED PETITION, DATED JANUARY 31, 2013

(pp. 20-22)
21

COUNTY OF NEW YORK
--------- ------------x
In the Matter of
THE LAW OFFICES OF

Petitioner, Index No. 13/100220
For Judgment Pursuant to Article 78
-against- NOTICE OF
VERIFIED PETITION
NEW YORK. CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT,
and RAYMOND KELLY, in his official capacity
as Commissioner of the New York City Police
Department,
Respondent.
------------------------------------------------------------------x
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that upon the annexed verified petition of Adam D.
Perlmutter, verified on the 29 th day of January 2013, an application will be made to Room
130 at the Supreme Court located at 60 Center Street, New York, New York, at 9:30 a.m.
on March 7,2013 for an Order and Judgment:
(1) directing Respondents to provide records responsive to Petitioner's August 30,
2012 FOIL request (attached to the verified petition as Exhibit T);
(2) awarding attorneys' fees in favor of Petitioner and against Respondents in an
amount to be determined at the conclusion of this proceeding; and
(3) granting Petitioner such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and
proper.
\i
...,
22
, . ..;;.
. ;~.~'
answer and supporting affidavits shall be filed at least five daYs<h~ <
this application and any adjourned date.
Dated: January 31, 2013

New York, NY ';,. "
f'"'-
Respectfully Submitted;
LAW OFFICES OF ADAM D; PERLMUTTER, p.e.
.,<I<C~",J.~~
~.~
.•
By: .oo...;........~~:--~:--,...,.,.,.. _ _;.."..;...
260 Madison Ave., Ste. 1800

New York; NY 10016
Tel: (212) 679-1990
Fax:(888) 679·0$85
adp@adplegatcom
1
23
VERIFIED PETITION, SWORN TO JANUARY 29, 2013

(pp.23-38)
24

COUNTY OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------------x
In the Matter of
THE LAW OFFICES OF

ADAM D. PERLMUTTER, P.e.
Petitioner, Index No. 1~/I~CJz;!-()

For Judgment Pursuant to Article 78 VERIFIED PETITION
ofthe Civil Practice Law and Rules
-against-

and RAYMOND KELLY, in his official capacity
as Commissioner of the New York City Police
Department,
Respondent.
------------------------------------------------------------------x
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
1. This Article 78 proceeding pursuant to the N. Y. Freedom of Information
Law ("FOIL"), Article 6 of the Public Officers Law ("POL"), seeks to vindicate the right
of the Law Offices of Adam D. Perlmutter, P.C. and of the public to access records held'
by the New York City Police Department regarding the maintenance of its Intoxilyzer
SOOOEN machines.
2. Petitioner has discovered materials indicating that previously
malfunctioning machines may be placed back into service without being repaired.
Hoping to discover information that would shed light on the scope of this practice,
Petitioner sought records under FOIL regarding the testing of these machines.
- 1-
25
3. In response to Petitioner's request, Respondent has not produced a single
document. Respondent's denial to both the initial request and Petitionds appeal offer
only general language that fails to provide a reasonable ground for the denial.
VENUE
4. Pursuant to C.P.L.R. §§ 7804(b) and S06(b), venue in this proceeding lies
in New York County, in the judicial district in which Respondent took the action
challenged here and where the offices of Respondent are located.
PARTIES
5. Petitioner the Law Offices of Adam D. Perlmutter, P.C. is a law finn
primarily focusing in the practice of criminal defense and civil rights litigation. The finn
is located at 260 Madison Ave., Suite 1800, New York, NY. The finn's website is
located at www.adplegal.com.
6. The firm's principal attorney is Adam D. Perlmutter, who has been
admitted to practice law in New York State since March 1, 1993. Mr. Perlmutter has
served as a member of the Legislative Working Group of the New York Governor's
Impaired Driving Task Force. Mr. Perlmutter is a member of the National DUI College,
and is a c~rtified operator of the Intoxilyzer SODDEN machine pursuant to United States
Department of Transportation regulation 49 C.F.R. Part 40. He has also published and
,
given lectures on the practice of OWl defense for the New York State Bar Association
and the Legal Aid Society of New York.
7. Respondent New York City Police Department ("NYPD") is a law-
enforcement agency administered under the New York City Administrative Code, Title
-2-
26
14. The NYPD is a public agency subject to the requirements of the FOIL, POL § 84 et
seq.
8. Respondent Raymond Kelly is a public officer who is named in his official
capacity as the Commissioner of the NYPD.
9. Unless otherwise specified, all allegations of fact are made on information
and belief, and are based upon cases in which Petitioner has served as counsel,
conversations with Assistant District Attorneys and other attorneys practicing in New
York State, and counsel's own investigation.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
A. The Role and Functionality of Breathalyzer Machines in New York City
10. Breathalyzer machines have been in public usage since 1954. By 1971,
New York courts acknowledged breathalyzers as scientifically accepted and reliable
methods of determining a subject's blood alcohol. See People v. Donaldson, 36 AD2d 37
(4th Dept. 1971). Prior to the advent ofbreathalyzer machines and breath testing, police
would determine a subject's intoxication based only on their observations. ld.
11. The breath test readings now determine the statutory penalties for drunk
driving in New York City. A driver with .05 or less percent blood alcohol level is
presumed not impaired. See VTL § 1195(2)(a). A driver more than .07 but less than .08
is presumed impaired, but not necessarily intoxicated. See VTL § 1195(2)(b). A driver
registering a .08 or more is charged with driving while intoxicated. See VTL § 1192(2).
A driver registering a .18 or more will be charged with aggravated driving while
intoxicated. See VTL § 1192(2-a)(a).
-3-
27
12. Even beyond the statutory penalties, an individual's breath test reading
will affect his ability to plea bargain with the prosecutor. Petitioner is not privy to all of
the related plea policies within New York City, but has learned, for example, that the
New York County District Attorney's Office will not offer a reduced charge of driving
while impaired (VTL § 1192[1]) to a defendant who registered a .13 or higher.
13. An individual who is arrested for drunk driving faces tremendous pressure
to take the breath test. If an individual refuses to take a breath test, his license is
automatically suspended for one year. Additionally, a refusal to take the breath test will
adversely impact a defendant's ability to plea bargain. Some district attorney's offices,
including New York County and Kings County, have a policy to not offer a reduced
charge of driving while impaired (VTL § 1192[1]) to a defendant who refused a breath
test.
14. In New York City, an individual suspected of drinking and driving is
offered only a breath test; the subject may not voluntarily give a blood or urine sample.
For chemical breath-alcohol testing, the NYPD exclusively uses the Intoxilyzer 5000
6801 series, also known as an Intoxilyzer 5000EN.
15. The NYPD maintains 28 Intoxilyzer 5000 machines throughout New York
City. See People v. Alia}, 36 Misc. 3d 682,689 (Sup. Ct., NY County 2012)
(summarizing testimony ofNYPD Officer Adrian Arav).
16. The Intoxilyzer machines are kept at six precincts: the 28th Precinct at
2271 8th Avenue in Manhattan; the 7th Precinct at 19 1/2 Pitt St. in Manhattan; the 45th
Precinct at 2877 Barkley Avenue in the Bronx; the 112th Precinct at 68-40 Austin Street
in Queens; the 78th Precinct at 65 6th Avenue in Brooklyn; and the 120th Precinct at 78
-4-
28
Richmond Terrace in Staten Island. See NYPD Highway District Intoxilyzer 5000EN
LD.T.U. Procedural Guide at 27 (the "Procedural Guide"), attached hereto as Exhibit A.
17. Two machines are kept at each location. See Transcript of testimony by
NYPD Technician Patricia Zippo from People v. Lopresti~ Sup. Ct., Bronx County, May
26,2011, Kindler, J., Index No. 1828-2007 (Zippo Test.) at 361 :S-8, attached hereto as
Exhibit B.
18. After a subject is arrested for drunk driving, he is brought to one of the six
NYPD precincts with an Intoxilyzer machine. The subject is then offered a breath test,
and informed that a refusal will result in an automatic suspension of his license. In New
York City, the breath test and coordination tests are offered and conducted on videotape.
See Procedural Guide at 19, attached as Exhibit A
19. The Intoxilyzer SOOOEN machine is a highly technical machine that
analyzes a subject's breath alcohol ratio using infrared spectrophotometry, and then
computes the subject's blood alcohol ratio. See Mary Catherine McMurray, Demystifying
the Intoxilyzer 5000 (March 2006) (attached hereto as Exhibit C).
20. The subject first breathes into a tube, and the breath travels into the sample
chamber. Infrared light is then passed through the sample chamber where it is collected
on the opposite end into filters. The filters generate an electronic reading based upon the
energy reading, and the electronic reading is then converted into a numeric reading. The
conversion process involves numerous delicate parts, and slight imperfections in any part
will drastically alter the results. A more detailed explanation is presented in McMurray's
article at Exhibit C.
-5-
29
B. The Requested Documents
21. The documents that are subject to Petitioner's FOIL request are generated
by the calibration, inspection and maintenance of the NYPD's Intoxilyzer SODDEN
machines.
22. The most routine check of the Intoxilyzer machines by a technician is the
field inspection. The NYPD conducts field inspections on each machine approximately
every five to fourteen business days. See Zippo Test. at 361:13-16, attached as Exhibit B.
23. The field inspection tests check to ensure that the machine is running
properly. During these tests, a technician runs an internal diagnostic check, a breath tube
heater check and three calibration checks. Id. at 377:20-378:15.
24. The internal diagnostic check generates a printout sheet that verifies that
the internal computing components are functioning properly, and includes a printer check
(an example of a diagnostic printout is attached hereto as Exhibit D). See also Exhibit C
at 19 (listing checks performed during an internal diagnostic check).
25. Three calibration checks are run on an Intoxilyzer during a field
inspection. During the calibration checks, the machine runs a test on a simulator
solution, which operates as the control, or reference standard. The solution is ethanol
predetermined to register at .10. When the calibration tests are run on the machine, it
generates a print out sheet (an example of which is attached hereto as Exhibit E).
26. The technician also fills a handwritten form with the Intoxilyzer's reading
on each calibration test, and notes the performance of the oth~r checks (an example is
attached hereto as Exhibit F).
-6-
30
27. The handwritten form also includes a remarks section, which is usually
blank, as in Exhibit F. Occasionally, however, it contains information about machines
being placed in and out of service. For example the field inspection form attached hereto
as Exhibit G indicates that a machine was placed out of service, but" [u]pon inspection
said instrument was found to be in good working condition and placed back into service. II
There is no additional information about why the machine was taken out of service, or
whether any adjustments or repairs were made.
28. A full calibration is done on each machine every six months. Zippo Test.
372:14-21. During a full calibration test, a technician runs a diagnostic check, additional
calibration tests, and simulates a number of potential errors to ensure that the machine is
able to properly detect them. Id.
29. As with the field inspection test, during the full calibration of an
Intoxilyzer, the technician prepares a handwritten coversheet that states that the checks
were performed (an example of a calibration coversheet is attached hereto as Exhibit H).
The technician notes on the coversheet what tests were conducted during the calibration.
30. These records are kept in the ordinary course of business of the NYPD.
Zippo Test. at 374:17-22; 379:20-25; Business Records Certification of Gamil Hannah
(attached as Exhibit I).
31. If the machine is operating correctly, each of the simulated errors
generates a printout properly corresponding to the error. Id. at 376:2-8.; Intoxylizer 5000
Operator's Manual, (the "Manual") at 25-26, (attached hereto as Exhibit J).
32. The calibration tests run during a full calibration of an Intoxilyzer machine
are similar to the same tests that are run during a field test, except that five tests are run
- 7-
31
instead of three. As with the field inspection calibration tests, the machine analyzes the
simulator solution and a printout is generated to reflect the readings of the calibration
checks (an example is attached as Exhibit K).
33. As part of the full calibration, the NYPD technician runs the same internal
diagnostic tests that are run during a field inspection. The results of the diagnostic check
are reflected on a printout. See Exhibit D.
34. One of the additional checks conducted during a full calibration is to
ensure that the Radio Frequency Interference ("RFI") detector is working. To conduct
the test, the NYPD technician will hold a transmitting police communications radio near
the Intoxliyzer during a test. Ifthe Intoxilyzer is functioning properly the machine will
register an inhibited RFI, and print the corresponding error sheet. (An example of an
inhibited RFI printout is attached as Exhibit L.)
35. The technician also checks the Intoxilyzer's ability to detect potential
interferents, which may cause the machine to register an incorrect reading. The
technician introduces both methanol and acetone in separate tests. If the machine is
functioning properly, it will print an "Interferent detected" and "Interferent subtracted"
sheet for each test. (Examples of Interferent detected and subtracted printouts are
attached hereto as Exhibit M.)
36. A properly functioning Intoxilyzer machine can detect alcohol present in
the subject's mouth, rather than alcohol present in deep lung air. In order to test the
Intoxilyzer for proper functioning of its mouth alcohol detection, a technician uses
Bianca or mouthwash immediately prior to blowing into the machine. See Zippo Test. at
- 8-
32
427:17. If the Intoxilyzer is functioning properly it will register an invalid sample, and
print a corresponding test error sheet (an example is attached hereto as Exhibit N).
37. An invalid test is registered if the technician commits a procedural error,
for example, the wrong button is pushed or the breath sample is given at the wrong time.
DW'ing a full calibration, a technician intentionally commits such an error and the
Intoxilyzer produces an invalid test printout (an example is attached hereto as Exhibit 0).
38. The technician also simulates an insufficient sample during a test by
blowing too little air into the sample chamber. Zipp Test. at 429: 1-6. The machine
should register an insufficient sample and print the corresponding error sheet (an example
is attached hereto as Exhibit P).
39. Petitioner has learned that the NYPD maintains a maintenance log for
each Intoxilyzer SODDEN machine operated in the city. (An example of a maintenance
log is attached hereto as Exhibit Q). These logs contain handwritten notes detailing when
each machine is calibrated, repaired or taken out of service.
40. The bulk of these records are not produced as discovery in a criminal case.
Even when specifically requested, these records are usually not part of discovery. See
Transcript for People v. Alvarado, 2011NYOIOllS (Crim. Ct., NY County July, 232012)
(Judge Schecter denying motion to compel individualized calibration printouts and
maintenance log, and New York County Assistant District Attorney Mireille Dee arguing
that FOIL is the proper method of obtaining documents) (attached at Exhibit R).
41. Other jurisdictions place these records online and open for public
inspection at all times. See http://www.fdle.state.f1.us/Content/Alcohol-Testing-
ProgramlMenu/Public-Records/Electronic-Data.aspx (last viewed Jan. 29,2013) (printed
-9-
33
examples from the Alcohol Testing Program - Florida Department of Law Enforcement
website attached at Exhibit S).
42. Similar testing program disclosure from Washington State Patrol Forensic
Laboratory Services can be viewed http://www.wsp.wa.govlbreathtest/wdms_home.htm
(last viewed Jan. 29,2013).
43. Petitioner is not aware of any harm caused by the open distribution of
these records.
C. The FOIL Requests
44. Petitioner first requested the desired records from the NYPD in a letter
dated August 30, 2012 (a copy is attached without exhibits hereto as Exhibit T). The
letter was mailed on August 31, 20 12 (a copy of the Affidavit of Service is attached as
Exhibit U).
45. Petitioner's request letter specified that it requested documents pursuant to
POL §§ 87 and 89. Petitioner requested copies of all calibration and maintenance records
for all Intoxilyzer machines owned or maintained by the NYPD for the last five years.
Petitioner specified the individual records requested, and included examples of each.
Furthermore, the request letter gave the serial numbers of 20 Intoxilyzer machines that
Petitioner believes to have been maintained by the NYPD during the past five years.
Petitioner explicitly indicated that the records for these 20 machines would be necessary,
but not sufficient to fully satisfy Petitioner's request.
46. On September 19,2012, Petitioner had not received any communication
from the NYPD that his request had been received. Petitioner called the NYPD records
office and inquired as to the status of his request. A paralegal at the NYPD records office
- 10 -
34
informed petitioner that Lt. Mantellino was still deciding the request, and would probably
issue a decision by the end of the week.
47. In a letter dated September 20, 2012, Lt. Richard Mantellino from the
NYPD FOIL Unit denied Petitioner's request (a copy is attached hereto as Exhibit V).
The letter simply claimed: "I must deny access to these records on the basis of Public
Officers Law 87(e)(i) as such recordsl information, if disclosed would interfere with law
enforcement investigations or judicial proceedings." The letter informed Petitioner of
how to appeal the decision.
48. Petitioner submitted his appeal in a letter dated September 25,2012 to
Jonathan David, Records Access Appeals Officer for the NYPD (an copy is attached
hereto as Exhibit W). In the appeal letter, Petitioner cited Matter ofGould v. New York
City Police Dept. 89 NY2d 267,277 (1996) and Matter ofLesher v. Hynes, 19 NY3d 57,
67 (2012), to demonstrate that the NYPD had a duty to identify potential hann posed by
the disclosure of these documents. Petitioner's appeal letter further explained that the
requested documents are not generated during tlie testing of any individual that may be
under investigation or have a pending litigation. Additionally, Petitioner noted that the
NYPD routinely testifies that these documents are created in the routine course of
business.
49. Petitioner mailed the appeal letter certified mail/return receipt requested
on September 25,2012. NYPD received the letter on September 27,2012 (USPS return
receipt card and website tracking infonnation attached at Exhibit X).
50. Officer Jonathan David denied Petitioner's FOIL appeal in a letter dated
December 3, 2012 (a copy is attached hereto as Exhibit Y). The letter denies Petitioner's
- 11 -
35
request pursuant to Public Officers Law §§ 87(2)(e)(i), (ii) and (iv) and 87(2)(g). The
letter offers only statutory language to support each ground for denial, with the exception
of the terse explanation related to POL §§ 87(2)(3)(i) and (ii): "[D]isclosure of the
requested records to just one party would interfere with the ordinary course of court-
supervised discovery and deprive other parties of their right to a fair trial or impartial
adjudication in ongoing litigation." The letter informed Petitioner of his right to
commence an Article 78 proceeding within four months of the date of the decision.
51. To date, Respondent has provided no documents, portions of docwnents,
or information extracted from documents.
CAUSE OF ACTION: ARTICLE 78 REVIEW OF A

WRONGFUL DENIAL OF A FOIL REQUEST
52. Article 78 is the appropriate method for review of agency determinations
concerning FOIL requests.
53. The NYPD's refusal of Petitioner's FOIL request was arbitrary, capricious,
an abuse of discretion, and constitutes an unreasonable denial of Petitioner's request.
Additionally, the NYPD has failed to perform the duties enjoined upon it by FOIL.
54. Petitioner has a right to the information regarding the calibration and
maintenance of the Intoxilyzer SODDEN machines.
55. Respondent has not produced the information sought by the Petitioner. To
date, Respondent has not turned over a single page of material.
56. Petitioner has exhausted its administrative remedies when it appealed the
NYPD's denial of its FOIL request and the NYPD denied that appeal. Petitioner has no
other remedy at law.
- 12 -
36
57. The NYPD's responses to both the initial request and subsequent appeal
were not timely. It did not respond to the Petitioner's initial request within five days as
required by Public Officers Law § 89(3)(a). It did not respond to Petitioner's appeal
within 10 days as required by Public Officers Law § 89(4)(a).
58. Respondent has not provided a reasonable justification for its non-
disclosure of the information sought by Petitioner. The NYPD has failed to adequately
explain any real or potential threat posed by the production of these documents.
59. Public Officers Law §§ 87(2)(e)(i), (ii) and (iv) are not applicable because
the requested records are made in the regular course ofthe NYPD's business, do not offer
any insight into non-routine investigative techniques, would not produce an unfairness to
any party in a pending litigation, and would not interfere with any court-ordered
discovery.
60. Public Officers Law § 87(2)(g) is inapplicable as the records contain only
factual data. See Comm. on Open Govt. FOIL-AO-1733 (1980) (attached as Exhibit Z).
REQUEST RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Petitioner seeks judgment:
1) Pursuant to C.P.L.R § 7806, directing Respondent to comply with their

duty under FOIL to perform an adequate search for the records requested in
the Petitioner's August 31, 2012 FOIL request and to disclose all portions
of the responsive records not subject to any exemption or other privilege;
2) Directing Respondent to produce the same requested documents on an

ongoing basis as such calibration and maintenance on the NYPD
Intoxilyzer machines are conducted;
3) Awarding attorneys' fees and reasonable litigation costs as allowed under

New York Public Officers Law § 89; and
- 13 -
37
4) Granting such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.

January 29, 2013
By:---,I--_ _---"''''"'''---_ _-=- _
Law ffices of Adam D. Perlmutter, p.e.

260 Madison Ave., Suite 1800
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 679-1990
Fax: (888) 679-0585
adp@adplegal.com
- 14-
38
VERIFICATION
STATE OF NEW YORK )

) ss:
COUNTY OF NEW YORK )
Adam Perlmutter, an attorney admitted to practice before the courts of the State of
New York hereby affirms, pursuant to C.P.L.R. § 2106, under the penalties of perjury
that:
1. I am the principle attorney of the Law Offices of Adam D. Perlmutter,
P.C., the Petitioner in the within proceeding.
2. I make this Verification pursuant to C.P.L.R. § 3020(d)(3).
3. I have read the attached Verified Petition and know its contents.
4. All of the material allegations ofthe Verified Petition are true to my
personal knowledge, and all statements in the Verified Petition are true to my
personal knowledge or upon information and belief. As to those statements that are
based upon information and belief, I believe those statements to be true.
Sworn and subscribed to me

this 29th day of January 2013
- 15 -
39
EXHIBIT A - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

NYPD Highway Patrol Procedural Guide
(pp. 39-142)
40
POLICE DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NEW YORK
H'IGHWAY DISTRICT
INTOXILYZER 5000 EN
I.D.T.U. PROCEDURAL GUIDE
41
INDEX PAGES
PAGES
1. D.W. r. Detection and Arrest 1-6
2. Intoxicated Driver Testing

Unit Procedures 7-9
3. Int~xi~ated Driver Testing Unit

Arrest Reports 10-11
4. Blood 12 -14
·5. Urine 15-17
,e- 6. Videotape Procedures 18-20
7. D.W.I. Related Offenses 21-27
. 8. Intoxilyzer 5000 EN Software Questions 28-31
.• 9. Operations Order Number 68
.10. Precinct Command Codes
11. Patrol Guide Procedures

42
D.W.I. 'DETECTION AND ARREST

The goal of the, New York City Police Department is to effectively' enforce D.W.1.
laws and thereby reduce the number of accidents and fatalities caused by these
drivers.
D.W.I. detection can be categorized into three phases. Each phase is a building
block towards identifying the impaired driver.
Phase #1 .. VEHICLE IN MOTION ~

Observing the vehicle in motion begins when the officer first notices the vehicle,
driver or both. Your attention may be drawn to the vehicle by such things as:
• A moving violation. (i.e. Speeding, unsafe lane

changes, or disobeying pavement markings)
• An equipment violation., (Le. Defective
headlight/taillight, defective muffler)
• Unusual driving actions. (i.e. Weaving within a lane,
moving at slower than normal speed, vehicle stopped
in traffic lane for no apparent reason)
• Evidence of alcohol or drugs in vehicle (Le. Open
alcohol container, visible drug paraphernalia)
• Driver appearance (Le. Face too close to windshield,
gripping steering wheel tightly, staring straight ahead
with fixed eyes)
• Inappropriate behavior (Le. Throwing an
object from
vehicle, urinating at the roadside, arguing with other
motorists).
43
I' ,
Key visual cues indicating driver impairment include:

'
1. Turning with a wide radius
2. Straddling center ,or lane marker
3. Almost striking 'object or vehicle
4. Weaving
5. Braking erratically
6. Driving the wrong way on a one way street
7. Driving recklessly or aggressively
, . ,
Phase # 2 - PERSONAL CONTACT

Phase two involVes the face-to-face observation and interview of driver.
Note! Phase two may take place without phase one. Th is
may occur during a checkpoint, vehicle stop or when you
have responded to the scene of an accident or disabled
vehicle.
Face-to-tace observation and interview of the driver 'allows the officer to use 3
senses to gather evidence of alcohol or drug influence:
) The sense of sight;

) The sense of hearing; and
) The sense of smell.
44
" .
There are a number of things you might obselVe during the interview that would
be describable clues or evidence of alcohol or drug influence. Among them are:
•
Bloodshot eyes;
•
Soiled clothing;
•
Fumbling 'fingers (Le. dropping license);
•
Alcohol containers;
•
Drugs or drug paraphernalia;
·'L.: .• Physic~1 coordination (i.e. swaying, unsteady,
;'·~t>x
balance problems);
:g-1":{' • Unusual actions (i.e. hiccuping, vomiting).
h%~~;·~iX: . .NG
~:';:::i~;JIfEAHI
::~~~~1;;:;\~< .
~;lf~~!~:'Among the, things you might hear dl~ring the intelView that would be describable
;i-~.~iJ~~i:·.clues or eVidence of alcohol or drug Influence are these:
:;J~~!:z.t~: '
,I": •. •~ ~E~~~f;!~gf~~~s;
,~Y: Unusual statements.
.·,·,····y;,SMELL
7
'{fiJ:1W :l'" .'. •
::S::9"yhere are things you might smell during the intelView that would be describable
~:ii.:;~i:~:;clues or evidence of alcohol or drug influence. Typically, these include:
~~I~'
.,
.i.::•... h
..
:;
,;:;/Dr:
• Open Alcoholic beverages;
• Marijuana;
• "Cover up" odors like breath sprays;
• Unusual odors.
45
REQUIRED ABILITIES
Proper face-to-face observation and Interview of the driver demands two distinct
but related abilities: .
> The ability to recognize the sensory evidence of

alcohol or drug influence; and
~ The ability to describe that evidence clearly and
convincingly.
',' Phase #3 ... PRE-ARREST SCREENING

,,'
.,:>.In the pre-arrest screening phase, your first task is to decide
whether there is probable cause for arrest. Your d~cision
£' involves careful review of each of the, obpervations you have
:. made. Conduct ~ "review" of the evidence cqllected during

>/ the vehicle in motion and personal 'contact phases. Your
...: second task may be to administer an Alcosensorllntoxilyzer
::test. The (P.B.T.) test is not mandated to affect a D.W.1.
..~: ·arrest.
~ ~
TIlE ALCOSENSORJINTOXILYZER S-D2

THIS TEST IS NOT TO BE THE SOLE BASIS OF ARREST. THERE MUST BE
OTHER, CLEARLY OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE OF D.W.!.
46
Administering the Alcosensor/lntoxilyzer S·D2

':to Operate: Press "READ" button and hold down for at least 10
seconds. The 'display should read ".002" or less. If a
higher reading is shown, depress and lock "SET"
button, wait 2 minut~s, repeat ready check. If the
display shows ilL", the battery must be replaced.
After receiving reading of 11.002 11 or lower,
depress and Jock I'SET" button.
Explain the t~st procedure to the subject prior to

obtaining a breath sample.
Request subject to take a deep breath a.nd blow

one continuous brea.th through the mouthpiece.
The SUbject must brow strong enough to
illuminate display light ilA" and long enough to
illuminate display light 118". When light liB"
i"umjnate~, press uREAD Il button, before
exhalation ceases. Keep read bufton depressed
until reading peaks. The highest value is the
subjects breath alcohol concentration. . During
}~sting, if lights nAil and "13" do not illuminate, the
subject has not provided a satisfactory breath
sample.
Note final maximum f(~ading, depress and lock "SET"
button. If, as a result of a test, the display is higher than
".002" or less it will take several minutes to reset before
the instrument can be used.
47
POINTS TO REMEMBER
, ,
",
: + Subject must be under the' officers direct observation 20

",., minutes prior to administering Arcosensor/lntoxilyzer S-
. D2, to insure the erimin.a.ti.0n of II mouth alcohol, II which can
cause a.n exaggerated read.i.l1g.
: • Do not allow the subject to hold tile instrument.
; • Do not allow tobacco smoke to be blown through the
mouthpiece. .
'~:' .' Store the unit with the IISET" button locked in the down
~;. ". position. .
:': ".Av~id sUbjecting the unit to extremes of temperat~re -
;', !.;:~:~storage in a coat pocket in hot or cold weather will help
" maintain the ins~rument in its optimum operating
.... temperature range.
.' + Do not subject the instrument to severe mechanical .
;..... shock. '
,.:,. ~. 'Use a new mouthpiece for, every test.
'~.:'. Subjects mouth should be free of all foreign matter.
\:. Ex. GUM, CHEWING TOBACCO AND FOOD
48
¡'
i
1
+
'I
¡,
¡t:
,.
.t
.1
I
i
¡
urpose:
.:
To provrde chemicar testing for persons I

motor vehrcle whíre unds, Í-,e inftuen"ã
a'ested for operating a
of Jåohor or drugs.
GUIDE IS PREFARED TO ASSIST HIGH.WAY DISTRICT 'l
rN pE R FO R MrNc r¡¡roxr cÃieö I.D.T.U, ì

o nrvER EXAn¡rNATroNs. Í
.1
ì
R TO ENTERING THE I.D,T.U, TESTÍNG
ROOtvt, ALL MOS t!
ECURE THEIR FIR EARMS.
I,D.T.U.
1. Make entry of a rival/depa_rture In |.D1T.V_.

Log at testing
facility. (Time of arrival at facility, Rank,
resurning patrol)
lqamJanj,iÀ"n
2' Crreok the rntoxifyeer 6000 EN and

verrf¡4 thal the ,,RED"
ted "rhdíoator irqrriis
is in ,sTANDBy,
ili ;'ä;ä.
pqoq. (rr rishí É "ri,-ão¡Ji;itäm.ent
instrumenr). Acrivare
Ínstrumonr bv depressins r-re ;eärËw;iiJi'iå*i-Ël,ton
(appraximaterv e *inrte ü,a^-ui'åiinË,r,i,äi "'
f"'
INTOXfLYZER SOOO EN BED
ON/OFF B UTTON WILL NEVER BE
FNED OF BY THE I.D.T.U, TECHNICIAN.
3' Check the printer and verify that theíeís onough paper in
the printer to conduct examinat¡on=- (lf no paper ín tray,
technician wíll place papor in rray oetore
siadõie;il.
49
4. Ascertain the next available I.D.T.U arrest log number

from the J.D.T.U. arrest log.
5. Verify that all equipment Is operating properly (Intoxily~er

5000 EN, Breathalyzer, Simulator or video equipment). If
equipment Is not functioning properly place out of
service, in<;flcate in the J.D.T.U. DIS log and notify the
Highway District.
, ,
6. Direct arresting officer to prepare the I.D.T.U. Arresting
Officers Report, Intoxicated Driver Examination (Sheet 1
& 2) and assist if necessary (If video officer is I.D.T.U.
qualified he may assist the arresting officer)
7. Observe the prisoner (subject) for (20) minutes prior to

testing and will insure that the subject did n<:>t have
anything to eat, drink or smoke and did not, regurgitate or
belch during the (20) minute observation period or during
the test. If any of the above actions occur the technician
must re-observ~ the subject for another (20) minute
period, prior to adminIstering the breath test.
·SMOKING IN THE TESTING FACILITY IS PROHIBITED AND ONLY ONE

. PRISONER IS ALLOWED IN THE TESTING' FACILITY WHEN
,:;;.:.' CONDUC'rJNG EXAMINATIONS•
. ".".
. CONDUCTING TIlE I.D.T.V. EXAMINATION
t· t.·lD.T.U.
~: tECHNICIAN
.~
".~ ::,,'.
8. Prepare the Intoxicated Driver Examination Sheet (PD
244·154 AA) read the examinations in a clear and
concise manner, exactly as it is written on the instruction
sheet.
9. If the subject agrees to take, the test videotape coverage

will be suspended until the instrument Is ready to take
breath sample.
SUBJECTS WILL BE VIDEOTAPED GIVING A BREATH SAMPLE INTO

, j
THE INTOXILYZER 5000 EN.
50
CONDUCTING THE I.D.T.U. EXAMINATION
I.D.T.U.
TECHNICIAN
(continued)
1O.lf the subject refuses to take tne test or does not give a
clear indication' of his refusal, P~rt'C of the Intoxicated
Driver Examination Instruction Sheet must be read to the
subject (If the subject refuses the breath test, the I.D.T.U.
Technician must offer the subject the coordination exam).
11 .If the defen~ant agref?s to take the test. utilize the

Arresting Officers Report IDTU (PO 213-151) and follow
the Intoxilyzer 5000 EN operational checklist and initial
each step that Is performed.
12. When the sUbject has completed giving a breath sample

or refused to do so offer the coordination exam.
13. Complete the data entry Information Into the Intoxilyzer

5000 EN.
'."NotE: IFTHE INTOXILYZER 5000 "EN SAC READING IS LESS

:~ THAN .05 OF .08 % AND THE S,UBJECT ,STILL APPEARS TO BE
'.• INTOXICATED' OR IMPAIRED, AND THE ARRESTING OFFICER
::' BELIEVES THE SUBJECT IS IMPAIRED, READ THE HIGHWAY
". DISTRICT INTOXICATED DRIVER EVALUATION SECOND TEST
:,'. (BLOOD/URINE) ANALy'SIS 'FORM AND NOTIr:Y'THE HIGHWAY
:, DISTRICT THAT A ORE TECH~ICIAN IS REQUIRED. IF THERE IS
NO ORE WORKING, THE IDTU TECHNICIAN WILL TAKE THE
URINE SAMPLE IF APPLICABLE.
IF THE. SUBJECTS BAC '-READING IS ABOVE .30 % THE HIGHWA Y

DISTRICT 1.0. T.U. TECHNICIAN WILL DIRECT THE ARRESTING OFFICER
":" TO HAVE THE SUBJECT REMOVED TO THE HOSPITAL. SUBJECTS THAT
:r:~~' . HAVE A BAC READING OF .30 % CAN BECOME A MEDICAL CONDITION
/~i.~~/ AND THE SUBJECT WILL BE REMOVED TO HOSPITAL.
.
.,lg
'''~',.,
.~ "/,'," .
.";. ~:;:~
',"' .
.y}:,~,
51
"<",.,, ','" ."(;;~l;~{tl::. i::~0J·~~;

'p\,
POLICE DEPARTMENT - CITY OF NEW YORK i .

j .
HIGHWAY .DISTRICT -I.D.T.U. ARREST

REPORTS .
1. INTOXICATED DRIVER EXAMINATION INSTRUCTION SHEET PO 244-

154A - Follow instructions on the examination sheet and perform the
coordination exam exactly as it I.s written on the sheet. In addition, indicate on
the sheet and on the I..D.T.U. Technicians Test Report the subjects
performance on the coordInation examination.
2. 1.0.T.U. TECHNICIJ\NS TESt REPORT PO 321-149 (01-01)-RMU - The

Ip.T.U. Tech,nician will prepare this report in his/her own handwriting. In
addition to the required captions the I.D.T.U. Technician will Indicate In the
box captioned Comments/Observations: a complete description of the subject
(i.e. physical description, clothing. identifying marks, glasses, shoes, etc). The
Technician is required to sign the bottom portion of the report.
: 3. ARRESTING OFFICERS REPQRT -IDTU PO 213-151 (REV.01-01)-RMU-

"
Arresting Officer will prepare all the caption's above the dotted line and
I.D.l.U. Technician will utilize t~e Intoxilyzer 5000 operational checklist.
". 4. I.NTOXICATED DRIVER EXAMJNATION (Arresting Officer) PD 244-154

,~. (Rev.01~01)-RMU - Sheet number 1.and 2 will be prepared by the arresting
<.. officer. The I.O.T.U. Technician will assist th~ arresting Officer and will review
the fonn for accuracy and completeness (the video officer may assist the
arresting officer if they are I.D.TU. qualified).
5. CHEMICAL TEST ANALYSIS REPORT PO 244·063 (Rev.1 O-OO)-Pent - The

1.0.TU. Technician will prepare the report In their own handwriting and
indicate the analysis reading by printing and signing their name on the
report.
HIGHWAY DISTRICT ,INTOXICATED DRIVER ·EVALUATION SECOND

TEST (BLOOD/URINE ANALYSIS) PD 321-147 (01-01) RMU - Pent· The
I.D.T.U. Technician will prepare this report when the BAC reading is less than
.05 of .08 % and the subject still appears to be Intoxicated or Impaired
blood/urine test will be conducted to determine the presence or absence of
controlled substances. TechnIcians are required to call the Highway District
and ascertain if a DRE is working and if one is available to respond to the
testing facility.
52
P01.lCeOEPARTMENT - CITY OF NEW YORK

fllGHWAY DISTRICT - I.D.T.U. ARREST
AEPO'RTS
7.lrJf~iWP;YJ;)ISTRlc;r-R~QU,ESTFO'R uRJ.NE;eX~M'.Nt\1IdNI'9 a21-146

'(Q.1l!Q,,1H"".MV • P~nt HiOhWe.y '~r$J&t TaskForc~:I.D~T'U. ,T,ehtiIQl$ri~ are the
~nTy technicians autho~ed;to··ttt.ke a yrJn~ $ampl~,tr()m'a ~J.lblEJot. This form
wnJ .t>e prE!P~rEJQby t~~. Highway Tacf1n.lclanand Jl'1·addltt6,n~metJrih~ will be
'transported'to Hig~way LJnlt 3s@tlonhQ'use atwhfeh trmethErD~$'Kdftlcer will
secure the spesirnen tnthe: refrtgeralor awaiting pickup by the laboratory. All
captions int~(:j Highway.O!st~9t Utine Log will be prepared as' well as the
invoices fors:haln ofevtdenee tOlaPoratory.
:. URINE - Technicians should try to obtain two two samples from the subject. Secure
the top of the specimen cont'1iner and initial the specimen, place in the
urin~ bag ~d seal properly.
HIGHWAY DISTRICT NON- PER'FORMANCE OF VIDEO TEST PO 321-

148(01-Q'1)- RMU - Pent This report will be prepared when there is no video
test performed during an I.D.T.U. examination.
~ 9. REPORT OF REFUSAL TO' SUBMIT TO CHEMICAL TEST DMV AA~134

Technician will prepare this report and distribute as indicated (Arresting officer
must bring two (2) capias of the refusal to court and give them to the District
Attorney when the complaint Is drawn).
53
Yf> ~:};;,;;;i, .~~,;j;:;~~:~,L4~.:'i~;

,
.:,': " '.:.' , •. :. " . '. ~:'l,'" ~',.)i' O!~; €".:;,',. '<~;.,'. f :~'"
9 • . '
.. ' . , : ' . ':;.,. '" ' .:,./,:; :,,~;,:HIGHWAV DISTRICT

BEQUESTED TO eBspoNii, TO 'HOSPITAL WHEN". Ii.
Dl!PSNDANT .IS INJUFlED AND IS,n, POSSIBtE' IJ.W.I.
f.,., ....:. :" ", ... ', ..., <,_
{BLOOD ,JOB).:.
I,D.T.U•
.. . TECHNICIAN
1. Ascertain the time of arrest and the location of the

hospital prior to responding.
2. Respond tQ: to:r.u. fact/lty .,or Uta H'fgowayUnll base

(EJI"OOl) 'Kits WIl.L .AL.SOae NlAN'FAINED Arf
THEH~' UNIT COMMANDS) QJJt~ib;ablbod I<itl and
the next ~vallable liD.T.U. ,arrest mJmber and the
following reports, Intoxfcated D'rivet 'Examination
Instruction Sheet, Chemical, Test, f\nalysls Report.
Intoxicated, Driver Examlnatlp'n (Atresting .Officer).
Arresting Officers Report -IDTU, fDTU Teqhniolans
Test RSj:)ort~ Report of Ref4sal toSubmlt tbChamlcal
Test. fn,aqdltion, the I.D.T.U. technlelan-WIII respond
to th~ IDTU facility' upon 90mpletlo.n cif' the blood job
and enter the arrest Information Into the Intoxllyzer
5000. (IF THE TECHNICIAN CANNOt DELIVER
.I
1
THE BLOOD SPECIMEN TO THE L.ABORATORY I
WITHIN THEIR TOUR OF DUTY, THE BLOOD \
,~
SPECIMEN WILL BE DELIVERED TO THE
HIGHWAY UNIT BASE AND THE DESK OFFICER
WIl'tL ASSIGN AN OFFICER TO D.ElIVER THE
i
I,
r.
SPECIMEN WITH .THE NEXT PLATOON AND TO ;~
ENTER THE ARREST INFORMATION INTO THE

u
"
\.
'.\
INTOXILYZER 5000 EN' AT THE TESTING ~
FACILITY).
3. Read the Intoxicated Driver Instruction Sheet (ALL

HIGHWAY UNIT 1.0.T.U. TECHNICIANS WILL HAVE
THE INSTHUCTION SHEETS WITH THEM WHEN
TURNING OUT) in the presencE! of tho arresting
54
officer, and hospita.l staff that may draw blood if

consent is received. If su~lect refuses to give a blood
sample, the job will be handled as a refusal to submit
to a blood test.
4. Remove blood kit from outer box.
5. Open blood kit box (REMOVE AND DISGARD THE

NEW YORK STATE POLlCE CRIME LAB,
SUBMISSION FORM, THIS FORM IS NOT TO BE
USED)•
.O$PITAL PERSONNEL REMOVING BLOOD WILL PERFORM

'rTHl: FOLLOWING PROCEDURES:
HOSPITAL
"ERSONNEL
a) Sterilization of the skin of the sUbject should be

accomplished by utilizing a suitable antiseptic agent other
than alcoho} or any antiseptic containing alcohol (an
. antiseptic pad containing an Iodine solution is included in
the blood kit).
b) A physician, nurse or laboratory technician will obtain (2)

blood samples following the instructions provided in the
blood kit titled "INSTRUCTIONS, FOR VACUTAINER
SYSTEM BLOOD COLLECTION KIT".
I.D.T.U.
'T,eCHNICJAN
'~¢ontinued)
1. .
6. Upon receiving the (2)' samples. from the hospital

authorities the technician will thoroughly mix the blood
samples by" geh'tly inverting, both tubes
approximately twenty (20) times DO NOT SHAKE. '
7. Fill in the '(2) seals (Form 200-350) provided In the

blood kit. In the space provided for No, indicate the
I.D.T.U. arrest number.
55
8. Seal each tube·byplaclng ~.5eal (Form 2QQw350) over

the stappey ~d wrapping ,the overhanglngeggesof
the $eal fin;nly·dewn the side of the tUbe so that the
specimen number of tile seal can be read.
9. Replace the sealed tubes plus remainder of blood

collection apparatus in the blood kit (plastic) box.
10. Fill In POLICE OFFICER'S REPORT on cover of

(plastic box). Disregard the CHAIN OF POSSESSION
entries. '
'11.8eal the blood kit (plastic) box with (4) iNTEGRITY

. . seals. Fill In captions "sealed by" and date.
12.After placing seals on plastic box, place Into

cardboard box.
<'elI 13. Enter on outer (cardboard) box where it states

"FROM" enter Rank, Name, Shield # and Command.
14. Voucher the, ~IQod kit ateltAet the pracinclof arrest (Jr
th~ practnot Where the hospItal Is (o¢~ted. After the
blood Is 'vQuphered, the I.D.r.U. ~eohnlclan will
tran$.port~e bldoGito the Pollee Lab.oratory at 150..14
JamaIoo Ave,.:~ Qu~en~J N.Y. 11423 for ~alysls~ (IF
, THE TEOHNIGfAN. CANNOT. TRANSPORT THE
BLOOD WITI"UN THE:IR TQUROF DlJTY, THE
BLQOD SPECJIVlSN. WILL TRANSPORTSDTO THf=
HIGrIWAY',UNfT BASE, AND THIi DESK OfFICER
WILL ASSIGN AN OFFICER TO 'DELIVER THE
BLOOD WliH THe NEXT PLATOON•
.'. THE HOSPITAL, AUTf10RI:r'ES RJ:'FtJS1;: TC:l TAKE, ,BLOOD,

. E HIGHWAY DISTRICT I.D.T.U~'··T@CHNICIAN WILL MAKE A
ENiD BeOK ENTRY 'OF tAe 'DoctORS, NAME~ DATE' AND
.ME. OF REFUSAL TO TAKE SLOOD. A NOTIFICATION WILL
l·l...SO BE 'MADE TO TH~, 'Or$XR,ICT :·Aitt?'RN~YS OFFICE
!.t\;JNPICATING THE HOSPITALS ,ReFUSAL TO:.TAKE .THE BLOOD
;;~~SAMPLE; THE t.D.T.U. TECHNICIAN WILL BE GUIDED BY THE
JfikHISTRICT ATTORNEYS DECISION.
i".'".,'
~.:._, ;.
;;I2'
:-.
56
URINE
. Bendiner and Schlesinger is the laboratory that processes all the I.D.T.U. arrests
. when urine Is taken as evidence. Highway District and Task Force I.D.T.U.
; Technicians are the only members of the service authorized to take urine
';. samples.
PROCEDURES
'. ,
.' ' Highway District I.D.T.U. Technicians when the' SUbject has consented to give a
" urine sample after reading the Highway District Intoxicated Driver Evaluation
: Second Test (BLOOD/URINE ANALVSIS).
':' If the subject consents to give a urine sample, notify the Highway District and
:~. ascertain if a (ORE) Drug Recognition Expert is working. The Highway District
I' Dispatcher will send the ORE to the testing facility.
. I.D.T.U.
TECHNICIAN
1. Obtain latex gloves; secure (2) urine specimen

containers and an evidence collection bag.
2. Take subject -to the bathroom with the arresting

officer; arresting officer will assist the Highway
Technle!an in securing the bathroom (NO CIVILIAN
OR MEMBERS 'OF ·rHE SERVICE ARE TO BE IN
THE BATHROOM WHEN URINE IS REQUESTED
FROM THE SUBJECT).
.., ., .
NOTE: WHEN TAKING URINE OR WHEN ESCORTING A PRISONER TO THE

BATHROOM NO MEMBERS OF THE SERVICE OR THE I.D.T.U. TECHNICIAN
ARE TO BE ARMED, ALL FIREARMS MUST BE SECURED.
IF THE SUBJECT IS A FEMALE, THEI.D.T.U. TECHNiCiAN WILL HAVE A

FEMALE OFFICER ASSIST IN OBTAININING THE URINE SPECIMEN. THE
TECHNICIAN WILL RECORD THE OFFICERS RANK, NAME, SHIELD
NUMBER AND COMMAND IN THEIR MEMO BOOK. THE TECHNICIAN WILL
THEN FOLLOW THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES.
3. Highway I.D,T.U. Technicians will have the subject fill

both the (2) urine specimen containers minimum half
way if possible.
IS
57
4. Upon receiving samples I.D.T.U. Technician will

secure containers by twisting on top, tight and
Insuring that specimen containers are sealed.
5. Prepare the chain OF CUSTODY envelope as

follows:
a) I, (Print I.D. T.U. Technicians name) then

(/.D. T.U. Technicians Signature) provided a
urine sample in a sealed container labeled
with code number for SUBSTANCE. ABUSE
TESTING at (Time) on (date) to (collector will
sign)
b) Bottle Sealed (check yes/no)
c) Place urine samples in CHAIN OF CUSTODY
BAG and·seal
d) (After sealing I.D.T.U. Technician will sign in
collectors signature and date)
6. Technician will prepare the Highway District

HIGHWAY DISTRICT - REQUEST FOR URINE
EXAMINATION PO • Highway District I.D.T.U.
Technicians and Task Force are the only technicians
authorized to take a urine sample from a subject. This
form will be prepared by the Highway Technician and
in addition, the urine will be transported to Highway
Unit 3 for processing. All captions in the Highway
District Urine Log will be prepared as well as the
invoices for chain of evidence to laboratory.
7. As of October 5, 1999, I.D.T.U. Technicians must

prepare a drug and custody control form when
submitting urine to the Highway District.
16
58
, . URINE
, -'"
:'':I~f:.fd·TECHNICIANS
WILL PREPARE THE THE HIGHWA Y DISTRICT DRUG
.'{fJJ.pt;USTODY FORM AS FOLLOWS.. .
;, ~{\,~:~ ",;
: (t}tP,TION
':'NUMBER
~.
1. DONOR NAME = Defendants Last name, First name, Middle initial

ID OR SOC SEC ## =IDTU # @ Highway District U~ine Control #
(From HD IDTU Urine Log)
7. COLLECtORS NAME-PRINT;: IDTU Technicians Last Name

COLLECTORS SIGNATURE:;: IDTU Technicians Signature
COLLECTORS SITE LOCATION = IDTU Locatton
=
DATE OF COLLECTtON Date Urine Sample Obtained
9. =
DATE Date Urine Sample Received
TIME = Time of Urine Sample
RECEIVED BY ;: Signature of Desk Officer
<I.D.T.U. Technician will staple the chain of custody form to the

.;·:-outside of the urine specimen transport bag, and part 6
; (EMPLOYER COpy) will be placed in the Highway District
X' administrative basket at the desk.
17
59
VIDEO
TAPE
I.D.T.U VIDEO TAPE PROCEDURES
:HIGHWAV DISTRICT I.D.T.U. VIDEO 'TECHNICIANS WILL UTILIZE
:rHE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES WHEN VIDEO TAPING
.:lNTOXICATED DRIVER ARRESTS.
VIDEO RECORDINq C!PERATIONAL

PROCEDURES
;~ VIDEO
; TECHNICIAN
1) Obtain the nElxt available uBLANK" videotape.
2) Remove the tape from the blank videotape. case

ana enter the required information.
A) I.D.TU.TEST NUMBER
B) READING (after result is obtained from I.D.T.U.
Technician)
C) PRISONERS NAME (Last name, First name)
D) ARREST # (N/A if not available)
E) PRECINCT OF ARREST
F) I.D.T.U. TECHNICIANS NAME (Last name)
G) VIDEO TECHNICIANS NAME (Last name)
H) REMARKS (State Ifcoordination test was
pertormed)
3) Activate video equipment b¥ turning on power.

(Inspect equipment and ascertain that
equipment is working properly- the
monitor, camera, and VCR)
4) Place videotape into recorder. (Press rewind to

rewound)
18
60
.VIDEO
TAPE
I.D.T.U VIDEO TAPE PROCEDURES
VIDEO
;.'TECHNICIAN
..(continued)
5) Press "RECORD" and uPLAY" simultaneously
when ready to begin taping. (Record light will
illuminate to show recording is in progress).
6) If the subject indicates that they will submit to the

breath test the video technician will pause the tape
(after direction of the J.D.T.U. Technician that
video tape coverage will be suspended).
7) Record the sUbject giving a breath sample into the

Breathalyzer/lntoxilyzer 5000 EN.
8) Activate the videotape when the I.D.T.U.

Technician indicates that he his ready to perform
the coordination test.
9) Upon completion of the I.D.T.U. examination

video, rewind tape, press ejects and place
videotape into plastic case (Insure that all captions
are filled In on videotape before securing tape).
NOTE: ALL TAPES WILL BE TRANSPORTED BACK TO THE

HIGHWAY UNIT COMMAND WHEN LEAVING THE I.D.T.U.
FACILITY AND PLACED IN THE PROPER STORAGE BOX.
10)Whenever video recording equipment is not

working properly and placed out of service, the
video technician. will make a notification to the
Highway District.
]9
61
ADDITIONAL DATA 5
~.
Co. All subjects wlJl be videotaped giving a breath sample into the
Breathalyzer/lntoxilyzer 5000 'EN as per Highway District Memo
, 23-18.
:. At "NO TIME" should the videotape be erased or rewound once
video· recording has begun.
:,:+ When. no videotape is performed for any reason the Desk Officer
. at the testing facility is required to witness the I.D.T.U. test (as per
Patrol Guide Procedure 208-40).
20
62
'i
u
i
I
1:
i
t
¡:
{..
¡l
'l
Í
¡
'''
Law Sectlonl l .t:,
L
I
t
ARy'pers.on, în ahi !r,

't
i'
acoldent,,of r
¡
,I
,t
, tesl to ,t
such operator has consumed alcohol , the police officer rnay request ,(
such operator to submit to a chemlcal test in the maRner set forth in

-.¡
t
t.,
subdlvision two of this section.
i
I
2t
63
D.W.t C,H'A~8GES
\. COMMON LAW D.WeI. SECTION 1194 (2) (a)
Any person who operates' a motor vehicle, in this state shall be

'd~emed to have given consent to a chemical test of one or more of
'the following: breath, bloo'd, urine or saliva, for the purpose of
',determining the alcoholic and/or drug content of the blood provided
.< that such test is administered by or at the direction of a police officer
:, with respect to a chemical test of blood, at the direction of a police
"officer .
):'1192.1 V.T.L. (DRIVING WHILE ABILITY IMPAIRED), - No

': person shall operate a motor vehicle while the persons
. ability to operate such motor vehicle is impa.ired by the
,: consumption of alcohol. (.050/0 through .07%)
• First conviction (Violation)
• Two convictions within
5 years is a (violation)
• Three convictions within
a 10 years is a
(misdemeanor)
'. 1192.2 V.T.L. (DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED} - No

, person shall operate amotor vehicle while such person
; has .08 of one per centum or more by. weight of alcohol
;' in the persons blood as shown by chemical analysis of
, such persons blood, breath, urine or saliva, made
pursuant to the provisions of section 1194 of this article.
• First conviction
(misdemeanor)
• Two convictions within 10
years is a
(E felony)
• . Three convictions within
10 years is a (0 felony)
22
64
: 1192.3 V.T.L. (D.W.I. Observatlonl- No person shall

: .operate a motor vehicle w~lile in an 'intoxicated condition.
; .
~ 1192.4 V.T.L (IMPAIRED BY 'DRUGS} - No person shall
operate a motor vehicle while the persons ability to
"operate such a motor vehicle is impaired by the use of a
:.drug.
• First conviction
(misdemeanor)
• Two convictions
in 10 years '(E
felony)
• Three
convictions in
10 years (0
felony)
, 1194.2 V.T.L (REFUSAL} - Refusa.l to submit to a

chemical test (Breathalyzer/lntoxilyzer 5000
'" .EN)(violation)
:. 1192.A V.T.L. (ZERO TOLERANCE) - No person under

. 21 years of age
shall operate a
motor vehicle
after . having
consumed
alcohQI (.02% to
.050/0 BAC)
23
65
~' The zero tolera~ce law (Patrol Guide Proee,dUr~:,208-1) ..

fC This law permits a police offiG~r to temporarily detalfl' a motorist less than 21
~~. years of age. for administering a chemical test. upon·'reasonable grounds to
~t,.believe that an individual is operating a motor vehicle after consuming alcohol.
,b The
.•
detainee must have a chero;~1
_.. •
te.st reading of .02% to .05% to be charged
)~r under the "zero tolerance law. II This law Involves a civil penalty. rather than a
~I'~
~,; criminal oharge. If the detainee submits to a chemical test and a reading of .06%
4tf pr higher is obtained and the detainee Is over 16 years of age, the detainee will
~t: ~e ~rrested and charged with intoxicated or Impaired driving accordingly.
r_,y~~
i~r>;
1W~
l~~.r.· .
~~~~~
~l{'~t,
~1r,'
~"f".'/'
~".F .
1;:'ta'; .
)~t·,!
If;
~1,1'
,
it.~. ~l
Itt.f
,~., .. ,
",
: .
24
66
VEHICLE AND TR'AFFI:C LAW SECTIONS

~~: REFERRING TO BLOOD
~if: ..
t!i~' . >
~,~t Section 1194.4 (a) subparagraph (1) states:

.. ~i/j); , .
'~J. ..
['4 At the request of a police officer, the following persons may withdraw
~~$,:.blood for the purpose of determining the alcoholic or drug content
fl;' therein (i) a physician, a registered pro~essional nurse or a registered
ltt~' physician's assistant; or (ii) under the supervision and at the direction
';.Qf a physician: a medica.l laboratory tec~nlcian or medical
.fechnologist as classified by - civil service; a phlebotomist; an
,':aavanced emergency medical technician as certified by the
~~:~epartment of health; or a medical laboratory technician or medical
:technologist employed by a clinic?1 laboratory approved under title
.:. five of article five of the pUblic health law. This limitation shall not
~. :a.pply to the taking of urine, saliva or breath specimen.
'~r ·Section 1194.4 (a) subparagraph' (2) states:

::;:f~
" ,
:No 'person entitled to withdraw blood pursuant to SUbparagraph one

'of this paragraph or hospital employing such person, and no other
.~ employer of such person shall be sued or held liable for any act done
:.or omitted in the course of withdrawing blood at the request of a
',police officer pursuant to this section.
..
:Section ,1194.4 (a) subparagraph
.
(3) states:
. ~
f:,.ny person who may have". cause, of

a~tion, arising from the
. ~ithdrawal of blood as afores~ld, for ,whl,cr n<;> personnel liability
, '. exists under subparagraph two of this 'paragraph, may maintain such
I , . _ .
l'i: . ·.
action against the state if any .p~tSOh 'entitled to ~ithdraw bl~od
. ' pursuant to paragraph (2) hereof' -acted at the 'request of a pohce
I officer employed by the state, or against the appropriate politica.l
'subdivision of the state. No. action shall: be maintained pursuant to

r this subparagraph unless notice of claim is duly filed or served in
~ ~;. compliance with law.
:;#~}::l:
'~'f'
~11\"f.; . . '
~t~i;,
l_r~~}'
~::~:)2~:
.ft.'11 ~~t'
({rIO'-;
I: 25
:~
67
t4
~,..
~;
, ';!:.
:wi'
~
...'!t:0
~Section 1194.4 (a) subparagraph (4) states:

ii.'"
W
'~P~withstanding the foregoing provisions of this
, aragraph an action may be maintained by the state or a
.;' plitical subdivision thereof against a person entitled to
~Withdraw blood pursuant to SUbparagraph one of this
.iearagraph or hospital empl~ying such person for whose
'~':ct or omission the state or the political subdivision has
.'een liable under this paragraph to .recover damages,
~ot exceeding the amount awarded to the cla.imant, that
J,flQay have been sustained by the state or the political
~UbdiviSion by reason of gross negligence. or bad faith on
l!'3e part of s~ch person.
~~ectfon 1194.4 (a) subparagraph (6) states:
~\
~.
IThe testimony of any person other than a physician, entitled to
fWithdraw blood pursuant to SUbparagraph one of this paragraph, in
~respect to such withdrawal of blood made by such person may be
~ecelved In evidence with the same weight, force and effect as if such
}withdrawaJ of blood were made by physician. '
;';:'
~SeC~ion 1194.4 (a) subparagraph (5) states:
t~he provisions of SUbparagraphs two, three and four of

~his paragraph shall also apply with regard to any person
iampfoyed by a hospital as security personnel for any act
:(;ione or omitted in the course of withdrawing blood at the
~equest of a police officer pursuant to a court or,dar in
accordance with subdivision three of this section.
"
Section 1227 V.T.t. Consumption or possession of alcoholic beverages in

certain motor vehicles.
~SEE OPERATIONS ORDER NUMBER 68, ISSUED 10-

23-00 ON NEXT PAGE)
26
68
INTOXICATED DRIVER TESTING LOCATIONS
:. Manhattan North 28 Pet. - 2271 8th Ave.

j;
t!.
:f
.r{'Manhatlan
k
'
South 7 Pet. . . 19 V2 Pitt 8t.
:1
it Bronx- 45 Pet. . . 2877 Barkley Avenue
112 Pet.... 68- 40 Austi n St.
78 Pet.... 65 6th Ave.
120 Pet. . . 78 Richmond Terrace
. }.
27
69
HWY DISTRICT INTOXILYZER 5000 EN

QUESTIONS AND PROCEDURES
QUESTION RESP LENGTH RESPONSE MASK
1. I.D.T.U. TEST # 8 ALPHA/NUMERIC/SEPARATOR
" 2. LAST NAME DEF 15 ALPHA
3. FIRST NAME DEF 15 ALPHA
; 4. MIDDLE INTIAL 2 ALPHA
. 5. REVIEW DATA 2 ALPHA
6. BREATH TEST YIN 1 YIN
A) If YES proceed to test
• If the subject cannot give a breath sample or refuses to

give a sample, Read the Intoxicated Driver Instruction
Sheet (PO 244-154A) and request the subject to give
another sample.
• The subject will have two attempts to give a breath sample
if after t,he sec'ond attempt the subject does not give a
sample, Press the R key and then the enter key, the IDTU
test will be conducted as a refusal.
• If the sUbject refuses to give a breath sample Press the R
key and then the' enter key, the IDTU test will be conducted
as a refusal. .
B) If NO proceed to question 7,8,or 9
7. REFUSAL YIN 1 YIN
A) Subject refuses to give a breath sample after reading the

Intoxicated Driver Instruction Sheet (PD' 244-154A) Press the R
,t
key and then the enter key, the IDTU test will be conducted as a ,.
refusal.
8. BLOOD TEST YIN 1 YIN
A) SUbject is admitted or is going to be admitted to the hospital and

request was or was not consented for a blood sample
28
70
,;9. URINE TEST YIN 1 YIN

r
A} SUbject has consented to give a urine sample or ,the lotoxllyzer
I.
<
r. .
5000 EN Bac reading is less than .05 of 1 % and app~ars to be
'.
intoxicated.
tJO. ADDITIONAL TEST REQUIRED YIN

l'
,
A} The subject has given a breath sample and the Intoxilyzer 5000 EN
(
~., Bac reading is less than .05 of 1 % and the subject still appears to be
r;
."" intoxicated•
l·.
;:,-. • If no proceed to next question
~:, • If yes what test BLOOD or URINE YIN
i:: ~
~.11. 'STREET ADDRESS 20 ALPHA/NUMERIC
{ ....
i!,:12.CITY, STATE 20 ALPHA
t;:-·
>,
,\.
~ 3. DOB-MMDDVY 6 VALID DATE
;'14. AGE 2 NUMERIC

"
::: 15. SEX MIF 1 ALPHA

I
t 16. RACE W/B/H/O

~."
1 W/B/H/O
~"
(.17. DRIVER L1C # 20 ALPHA/NUMERIC
,
r18. STATE OF ISSUE
:.
2 ALPHA
l'
i:·. 19. OCCUR./PLACE 20 ALPHA/N UMERIC
f. '.
i·: 20. OCCURfTIME 4 NUMERIC
:- 21. TIME OF ARREST 4 NUMERIC
: 22. CHECKPOINT YIN 1 YIN

.,. 23. PATROL YIN 1 YIN
24. AlO OBS YIN 1 YIN
25. CIVILIAN OBS YIN 1 YIN

26. ACCIDENT YIN 1 YIN
29
71
27. NUMBER KILLED 2 NUMERIC
28. NUMBER INJURED 2 NUMERIC
29: ADD.CHARGES YIN 1 YIN
-30. TOP CHARGE 20 ALPHA
31. LAST NAME A/O 15 ALPHA
32. FIRST NAME A/O 15 ALPHA
33. TAX NUMBER 7 NUMERIC
34. SHIELD NUMBER 5 NUMERIC
35. COMMAND 3 NUMERIC (use cmd code
36. SIMULATOR SER # 15 ALPHA/NUMERIC/SEPARATOR
37. STD SOL CONTL # 5 NUMERIC
38. LAST NAME OPER 15· ALPHA
39. FIRST NAME OPER 15 ALPHA
40. TAX NUMBER 7 NUMERIC
43. LAST NAME WIT OF 15 ALPHA
44. FIRST NAME WIT OF 15 ALPHA
47. FIELD TEST YIN 1 . YIN
48. INST MAKE 11 ALPHA/NUMERIC/SEPARATOR
49.· SCREENER SER # 6 ALPHA/NUMERIC/SEPARATOR
30
1; 72
t:
&.
~.,
~~>
.1-::-, •
'~i' • , ~
~~,.·50. TIME OF TEST 4 NUMERIC

~;;~51. READING
<
4 NUMERIC
. ,"~ ~
~
~,···'52. LOCATION FLD TEST 20 ALPHA/NUMERIC

f?
;' 53..VEHICLE SEIZED YIN 1 YIN
~
,;' 54. IF NOIWHY AND END TEST 11 ALPHA

~. *If yes go to (Next Question)
55.VEHICLE MAKE 15 ALPHA/NUMERIC/SEPARATOR

,:. 56. VEHICLE MODEL 15 ALPHNNUMERIC/SEPARATOR
r
~:... ·57. VEHICLE PLATE 8 ALPHA/NUMERIC/SEPARATOR
,"
'1•• 98. STATE OF VEHICLE 2 ALPHA
t
>
I.
<,
,
i'
r
31
73
~UBJEcr: .LEGISLATION.REGARDING ALCQHOLIC BtYERA~.ES)N

MOTOR VEmCL~S
DATE ISSUED: NUMBER:,
10-23-00 68'
1. Effective immediately, Vehicle and Traffic Law (VTL) Section 1227, ··Consumption or
:ssion of Alcoholic Beverages.in Certain· Motor Vehicles," suJjdivision (1), has been amended to
Iy prohibit the possession of open containers of alcohol by either the driver or passenger of any
r vehicle l~ on a public highway. This proh.ibition of an open container of alcohol applies
dless ~f the driver's or passenger's intent to consume the alcohol arid whetI,er or not the vehicle is
: driven. Any driver or passenger violating VTL Section 1227 (1) shall be guilty of a traffic
~~ .
',2. Accordingly, a police officer merely observing an open' container of alcohol in an

~led vehicle located upon a pubHc highway (sticet) or right·of-way public highway will be
~rizedto issue a summons to the person(s)in ppssession of su~h container, driver and/or passenger,
ling VTL Section 1227 (I).
~. The one exception to the open alcohol container provision of VTL Section 1227 (1)
nues to be in effect Persons in chauffeur driven passenger vehicles operated pursuant to a
ticate or pennit .issued by the NYS Department of Transportation or the U.S. Department of
sportation-may
.
continue to be in possession
. of open containers in their vehicles.
,4. It should be noted that this legislation does not preclude a unifonned member of the
;ce from· utilizing New York City AdmPtistrativeCode Section 10-125, o4Consumption of Alcohol
ltr'eets Prohibited," under circumstances where occupants of a stationary vehicle are observed in
~sion of an open container of a~coho1. However, a violator may not be swnmonsed under both the
.and the Administrative Code for the same act.
5. Any questions regarding this order should Pc directed to the Legal Bureau at (212) 374-5400.
,6. Commanding officers will ensure th~lt the' contents of this order are brought to the
ltion of members of their commands. .
DIRECfION OF THE POLICE COMMISSIONER
TRIBUTION
Commands
t or J
74
i,' 09/18/00 LISTING of COMMANDS IN ALPHABETIC ORDER PAGE II 1

~***~***********~********************~
COMMAND' LITERAL COMMAND COMMAND
UT CODE
~UUE~~*~~~****** *~***~ *******
, ADMINISTRATIVe SERVICES DIV ADM DIV 363
AIDED UNIT AID UN 608
APPLICANT PROCeSSING DIV A P PIV 376
ARSON AND EXPLOSION DIV A-E-DIV 227 CD,ORMANT COMMAND)
~UDITS & ACCOUNTS SECTlON AUDSACC 358
AUTO CRIME DIVISION AUTO CD 126

AUXILIARY POLICE SECT AUX P.S 560 .
AVIATION UNIT AV.UNIT 480
B.N. STRATEGIC NARC.S GUN TEAM SNAG-BN 5ti9 (DORMANT COMMAND)

B'KLYN SOUTH EAST NARC. DIST. BiS-END 742
li.'KLVN soUtH WEST NARC. D1ST. B/S-WND 141
BARRIER SECTION BARRIER 564

, - .
BKLYN CAREER. CRIM .IVEST UNIT BK CCIU . 223 (DORMANT COMMAND)
BKLYN CENTRAL BOOKING ··BK C BK 583 (DORMANT COMMAND)
BKLYN HORTH NARC DIST : BNNARCD 548
BKLYN RDBBERY'SQ ..DKROBSQ 278

: ~
<.
.,(
..
: BOMB SQUAD ,BOMB

ax eCIU
SQ 228
222
.
(VORMANT COMMAND)
BRONX CAREER CRIM INVEST UNIT
. .,.
~,v~
,~
.
BRONX CENTRAL BOOKING. ':BX C BK 588 (DORMANT COMMAND)

.
,~.
i~:'
BRONX COURT SECT BX 'CT 584
's"
'~ BRONX DEl A~EA/CRIM ID UNIT DXD CID 262
!I<:
,~ BRONX NORTH NARCOTICS DISTRICT ilxiN~NO 73Z' .

'~-*
i1iW
. BRONX ROBBERY SQUAD DXROBSQ 275
~
~i\ BRONX SOUTH NARCOTICS DISTRICT BX/S-ND 731
~f
~t.~' BRONX TRAFFIC TASK FORce TR/DXTF 403
ui~i
l'~'
J~r:.'
~\l::
:~.
f!~~'
t.i~t(
V?"
:&~~:
~~:
.'
r' tl
"
it~
,'.,
t. ~
75
09/18/00 LISTING OF COMMANDS IN ALPHABETIC ORDER PAGE It z

**************~************************
'., COMMAND LITERAL COMMAND coMMAND
LIT CODE
******* *******
BROOKLYN COURT SECTION BKLN CT 582
I BROOKLYN NORTH WARRANT SQUAD BK N ws 577 (DORMANT COMMAND)
~;: BROOKLYN TRAFFIC TASK FORCE TR/DKTF
"..,'t"
~~,
.~
BUILDING MAINTENANce SECT BM SEC 366
~;" BUS UNIT ' BUS UT '406
i: CANINE TEAM ESU CAN ti65
~(, , CAREER CRIM APPREHENSION UNiT CCAU 221 (DORMANT COMMAND)
,~~ CAREER CRIM MONITORING UNIT C C M U 220 (DORMANT COMMAND)
~~, CAREER CRIM SECT CARCR,MS 610 (DORMANT COMMAND)
CENTRAL INVEST & RESOURCE DIV CI8RDIV 203
CENTRAL PARK P.RECINCT CPK PCT 483
CENTRAL PARK SCHOOL SAFETV UT CPK SSU 922 (DORMANT COMMAND)
CEHTRAL PK DET SQ CPK DET 247
CENTRAL RECORDS DIV CEN REC 605
CENTRAL ROBBERY DJVISION CENROBB 206 (DORMANT COMMAND)
_ CH DEPT STRATEGIC ANALYSIS SEC COD SAS 526
'::1':-
,.~:' CHIEF ~F DEPARTMENT OFFICE CD OFF 551
'1.,-
tr CHIEF OF DEPT CMD8CONTROL CTk CD CSC 527
l"i~·
~* CHIEF OF DEPT INV REVIEW SECT CD IRS 530
CHIEF OF DEPT orER DIV CO orlD 553
CHIEF OF DEPT OPER UNIT CD OP/U 555
CITY W~DE SUMMONS ENFORCEMENT CWS ENF 864', (DORMANT COMMAND)
CIV COMPLAINT INVEST BUREAU CCI B 501· (DORMANT COMMAND)
COLD CASE APPREHENSION SQUAD C CAS 557'
COM. AFF .ICRIME PREV. Dn;. CA/CP D 513
76
09/18/00 LISTING OF COMMA~DS IN ALPHABETIC ORDER PAGE II 3

***M****M************************~*****
COMMAND LITERAL COMMAND COMMAND
'liT CODE
*************tOE ******* *******
COMMUNICATIONS VIV COMMDIV 575
COMMUNICATIONS SECT COMMSEC 576
COMPUTER TRAINING UNIT CTU 352 (DORMANT COM~tAND)
CDDRDIN/REVIEW SECT PSB CRS 134 (DORMANT COMMAND)
COURT DIV 'CT DIV 578 (DORMANT COMMAND)
CRIM.E PREY S£CT 'C/PRV S 125 (DORMANT COMMAND)
....;.
CRIME PREVENTION SECTION OR PREV 561
CRIME SCENE UNIT C/SCENE 568
CRIMINAL JUSTICE BUREAU CRJ BUR 520
CRIHINAL RECORDS SEcr ~ . ~RM REC 607
DA SQ iRONXCOUNTV DA IIX 261
VA SQ KINGS COUNTY DA IIKN 261
VA SQ NY COU'NTV DA NV 205
DA SQUAD QUEENS COUNTY, DA QNS 311
DEP COHM MANAGEME~T;& ij~DGET D C MB 353
DEP COHH OF COMMUNITV AFFAIRS D· C C A SZ3
DEP COHM OF .lEGAJ. MATTER~.,: . DeL M 518
DEP COHH OF PUBlIC INfO D C,f I 524
DEP COMM OF TRIALS D C TRl 5~7
DePARTMENT ADvaCATE'S OFFICE OPT ADV 550

,
DEPUTV COMM.O.F ,~PERAlIDNS DC OPER 504
DET BORO BKLN NORTH TASK FORCE DB BtlTF 309 (DORMANT COMMAND)
DET BORO BKlN SOUTH TASK FORCE DB BSTF 307 (DORMANT COMMAND)
DET ,BORO BKI.VN DB BKlN' 260
DET BORO BKLYN CRIM 10 UNIT DB neIU 211
77
09/18/00 LISTiNG OF COMMANDS}" ALPHABET,Ie ORDER PAGE n

!lOOOnUUE****!IE***!IE*!IE'*!IE***~{lE********lE*****
COMMAND LITERAL COMMAND COMMANIi
• LIT CODE
******* **~****
DET BORO BKLVN NO HOMICIDE TIF DB BNHM ~IS
DET BORO BKLVN NO OPER DB BNOP 308 (DORMANT COMMAND)

DET BORO BKLY~ SO HOMICIDE TIF DB DSHM 313
DET DORD BKLYH SOUTH OPER DBDS 'OP 306 (DORMANT COMMAND)
DET DORO BKLYN SPEC VIC SQUAD DB BSVS 305
DET BORD BRONX DB BX 260
DET DORO BRONX SPEC VIC SQUAD DB DXsv 276
DET DORO DX HOMICIDE TIF DB BXHH 274

DET BORO MAN CRIM ID UNIT DB MeID 231
DET BORO MAN NO HOMICIDE T/F DDMNHTF 314
DET BORO MAN NORTH T/F DB MNTF 233 (DORMANT COMMAND)
DET BORO MAN SO HOMICIDE TIF DB MSUM Z32
DET BORO MAN SPEC VIC SQUAD DB MSVS 256
DET BORD MANHATTAN"" DB HAN Z30
DET BORO QNS HOMICIDE TIF DB QNflM 316
DET BORO QUEENS DB QNS 310
DET'BORO 'QUEENS SPEC·VIC SQUAD DB QSVS 327
DET BORO QUEENS TASK FORCE DB QNTF 351 (DORMANT COMMAND)
DET BUREAU DET BUR 201
DISORDER CONTROL UNIT DIS CTl 554
DRIVER ED. AND TRAINING UNIT DR.EDST 398
DRUG ABUSE RESIST. Ep. UNIT D.A.R.E 515

DRUG ENFORCEMENT TASK FORCE O-E T/F 540
EMER SERV SQ 01 ESS 01 451
EMER SERV SQ 02 ESS 02 452
78
09/18/00 lISTIN~ OF COMMANDS I~ ALPHABeTIC ORDER PAGE Il- -5

***************~********~**************
LIT CODE
~nn(*)UnHaElnnE~*
******* *******
EHER SERV SQ 'OS' ESS 03 453
EMER 'SERV sq 04 ESS ot; 454
EMER SERV S.Q 06 ESS 06 456
EHER SERV SQ 07 ESS 07 457

EMER SERV .SQ 08 ESS 08 458
EMER SERV SQ 09 ESS -09 459
EMER SERV SQ 10 Ess 10 460
EMER SERV UNIT
. . E 5 U 450
EMPLOYEE MANAGEMENT DIV PO E~D 391
EMPLOYEE RELATIONS SECTION EMP REL 521
EMPLOYMENT' SECTION PB EHPL 381 . (DORMANT COMMAND)
EQUIPMENT SECTI~N EQP SEC 364
FIELD CONTROL DIV OCCB e.,••
FCwD~V 569 (DORMANt COMMAND)
fIELD TRNG ~NIT S/I FTUSII 160 (DORMANT COMMAND)
F.IELD TRNG UNIT 01 FTU 01 142 (DORMANT COMMAND)
F~ELD TRNe UNIT 02 FTU 02 143 (DORMANT COMMAND)
fIELD TRMG UNIT 03 FTU 03 144 (DORMANT COMMAND)
fIELD TRHG UNIT 04 FlU (l4 145 (DORMANT COMMAND)
FIELD TRNG UNIT 05 FTU 05 146 (DORMANT COMMAND)
FIELD TRNG UNIT
D6 FTU 06 147 (DORMANT COMMAND)
./;.
FIELD TRNG UNIT
07 FrU 07 148 (DORMANT COMMAND)
FIELD TRNG UNIT
08 FTU 08 149' (DORMANT COMHAND~
FIELD TRHG UNIT

09 FTU 09 150 (DORMANT COMMAND)
FIELD TRN~ U~IT 10 FrU 10 151 (DORMANT COMMAND)
79
o9/is/oo
.
LISTING OF COMMANDS XN'ALPHABETIC ORDER PAGE U
***************************************
LIT CODE
*************** ******* *******
. FIELD TRNG UNIT 12 , FTU 1Z 153 (DORMANT COMMAND>
FIELD TRNG UNIT 13 .FlU 13 154 (DORMANT COMMAND)
FIELD TRNG UN~T ~4 FTU l'i 155 (DORMANT COMMAND)
-,

FIELD TRNG UNIT 16 FTU 16· 157 (DORMANT' COMMAND)
FIELD TRNG ~Nlr 17 FTU 17 158 (DORMANT COMMAND)
FIELD TRNG UNIT 18 FTU 18 159 (DORMANT COMMAND>
FIREAR~S & TACTICS ~ECTI~N F.T.S. 397
FIRST DEP COMM OFFICE lST·D.C 502
FISC.AFF.DIV.-HEALTH INS.SECT. FAD HIS 371
FISCAL AFF.·DIV~QUAL.COH.SECT. FAD QCS 362
FISCAL AFFAIRS DIVISION FISC AF 360

FLEET SERVICES DIVISION FlT SVC 57D
..... ...
FORENSIC INVESTIGATIONS DIV.: FOR INV 563
FUGITIVE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION FUG ENF 559
GANG INVESTIGATION DIVISION GANG ID 592
GANG UNIT BRONX GANG ax 597
GANG UNIT BROOKLYN NORTH GAt:lG BN 594
GANG UNIT BROOKLVN SOUTH GANG BS 595

GANG UNIT MANHATTAN ... GANG M 598
GANG UNIT QUEENS GANG Q 596
GANG UNIT STATEN ISLAND GANG 51 593
HARBOR UNIT HARDOR 470
HATE CRIME TASK FORCE DB HATE 556

HEADQUARTERS CUSTODIAL SECT HQ CUST 369
80
09/16/00 LISTING OF COMMANDS IN ALPHABETIC ORDER PAGE II 7

***************************************
lI"( CQDE
******* *******
HIGHWAY DISTRICT HWV DST 410
HIGHWAY EMER SERV SII HES/Sl 445 (DORMANT COMMAND)
HIGHWAY UNIT NO 1 HWV 01 411
HIGHWAV UNIT NO 2 HWV 02 'ill
HIGUWAY UNIT NO 3 HWV 03 413
HIGHWAY UNIT NO.4 HWV 04 414
HOMELESS OUTREACH UNIT HOMLESS 129
HOUSING BOROUGH MANHATTAN H MAN 822
HOUSING BROOKLYN H BKlVN 821
HOUSING BUREAU HSG DUR, 800

HOUSING BX/QNS H DX/Q 823
HOUSING DETECTIVE HB DET 611 (DORMANT COMMAND)

HOUSING ELEVATOR VANDALISM UHf H VANDL 83ti
..... .""
HOUSING INV~STIGATIONS UNIT H IHV U 820
HOUSING MISC. COMMANDS H OTHER 835 (DORMANT COMMAHQ)

HOUSING OPERATIONS HOPER 810 (DORMANT COMMAND)
HOUSING PM 1 .PSA 1 801
HOUSING PSA Z PSA 2 802
,HOUSING .PSA 3' PSA 3 803
HOUSING PSA Ii PSA 4 804

HOUSI~G PSA 5 P'SA 5 80S
'HOUSING PSA 6 PSA 6 606

HOUSING PSA 7 .PS1\ 7 807
HOUSING PSA 8 PSA 8 808
HOUSING rSA 9 PSA 9 809

81
PAGE tt
09/18/00
. ~~~~~:*~~~i~~~~~~~~~~*t~~~Q~~~l~~~~~i~' 8

LIT CODE
JE*JaE**lOEQ***** ******* *******
A, HWAY DIST/SAFETY ENFDRC UNIT ,HWV SEU 415 (DORMANT COMMAND)
IDENTIFICATION SECTION 10 SECT 606
,
~.
IN~SERVICE TRAINING SECT INSRVTR 38Z
~<
INSPECTIDNAL SERVICES BUREAU INS 58 499 (DORMANT COMMAND)
:~
1NT CRIMIN~~ INTELlIGENCE SECT INT CIS 3Z0
'I( INTELL-CRIMINAL SECTIQN TRT CS 318 (DORMANT ,COMMAND)

"
., INTELL-MSS~EXEC. PROTECTION INT EPU 3Z1
INTELL-HSS~UN~~ORM OPERATIONS INT UOU 322
INTELl-PUBlIC SECURITY SECTION INT PSS 319
.
i·
INTELLIGENCE DIVISION INT DIV 533
.~ INTERNAL AFFAIRS BURE~U LA.B. 497
INTERSECTION,CONT~OL UNIT INT CU 885 (DORMANT COMMAND)
'" INVESTIGATIVE SUPPORT DIVISION INSUPDV 537
JOINT OR~ C~~HE NARC T/F 30CNTF 758 (DORMANT COMMAND)
,"i·
-,
~
,
JUVENILE CRIME.SE~TION JUV eRM sse
LATENT PRINT SECTION DB LPS 207
LEADERSHIP TRAINING SECTION LDS TRN ~8S
LEAVE INTEG~ITV MGT. SECTION l.I.M.S 361

LEGAL 'BUREAU lEG BUR 519
LICENSE DIVISION LIC DIV 357
MAIL S DISTRIBUTING UNIT DISTRIB 368
MAJOR CASE SQUAD MC/SQD 219
MAN CAREER CRIM INVEST UNIT r1 CCIU 218 '(DORMANT COMMAND)
MAN CENTRAL BOOKING MH C UK 581 (DORMANT COMMAND)
MAN COURT 'SECTION MAN CT 579
82
09/18/00 LISTING OF COMMANDS IN ALPHABETIC ORDER PAGE .. 9

**************************************~
COMHAND LITERAL COMMAND COMMAND
LIT CODE
***~OE~~UUE.~,***** ******* *******
MANAGEMENT INFORM. SYSTEMS DIV' MIS D 3S9
".
MANH ROBBERY SQUAD HNROBSQ 257
HANH. SO. DOWNTOWN NARC. DIST. o M/S-DNO 752
MANHATTAN"NORTH NARCOTICS EAST MIN-HE 5~6
.
MANHATTAN ,NORTH NARCOTICS WEST H/N-NW 545
MANHATTAN SOUTH'NARCOTICS DIST M/S-ND 751
MANHATTAN TRAFFIC TASK FORCE TRF/MTF 401
MEDICAL DIVISION MED DIV 388
MIL S EXTENDED LEAVE STAFF MEL STF 399 (DORMANT COMMAND)

MILITARY & ExtEND LEAVE DES~ . MEL D 396
MISSlNG PERSONS SQUAD MP SQD 229
MOUNTED UNIT MOUNTED ti20
MoVIe AND T.V. UNIT TV UNIT 490
MTN DET SQUAD
,. MTN DET 243
MT~ SCHOOL SAFETY UNIT MTN SSU 918
Mrs DET SQUAD MTS DET 2til
MTS SCHOOL SAFETY UNIT Mrs ssu 927
NARC BORO BK NORTH NARC~BN 547
NARC BORO DS NAReDDS 740

HARC B'ORO BX HARCBBX 730
NARC BORO MN NORTH HARCDMN 544
NARC BORO MS NARCBMS 750
NARC BORO QHS NAR'CBQN Stil

HARC BORO S/I NARCBSI 755
NARC OIV BRONX SOUTH INIT. ND BXSI 911
83
09/16,100 'LISTING 'Of COHMAND.5 IN ALPHABETIC ORDER PAGE II ' 10

*~~**~*********~~~~*********~*******~**
COMMAND LITERAL COMM.AND coM.MAND
UT CODE
*****tE* *******
NARC DIV NORTHERN HANH. INIT. tJD NHI 910
.' .".
NARC DIV SOUTHEAST QUeeNS IN1T ND SEQI 91Z
"
NARC.DIV.DK SOUTH INIT. ~D DKSI B97
~ .. :
\"
NARC.DIV.BRONX CENTRAL INIT. ND .BXCI 898

NARC.DIV.~ENTRAL HARLEM INIT,. ND CH I 913
"~RC.DIV.EAST HARLEM INIT. ND,EH I 914
NARC.DIV.QUEENS NORTH INIT. NO Q/NI 899 'J
"
~
NARC.DIV.STATEN ISLAND INIT. ND 51 I 915
)
NARCOTICS DIVISION accs NAR
, .
DIV 3~7 I
NYC DEPT OF INV SQD DPT INV 202

NYC JOINT BANK ROB T/F JB/R/TF 571
.:
oFF MGHT ANALVSIS S PLANNING o HAP 586
OFF OF DIRECTOR OF TRAINING .OIR TRN 590
,"
OFF OF EQUAL EMPLV OPRTY OE~O 380
OF.F, TECH & SYS DEV O',T S D 591

OFf/CIV 8 STAFF DEV OFF/CIV 503 (DORMANT CQMMAND)
OFFICE OF lABOR RELATIONS OFF/L R 567
OFFICE SUPVCHIEF SURGEON OFSCSRG 366
ORGANIZeD CRIME CONTROL BUREAU oCCn 538

oRaA~IZED CRIME INveST DIV oC I D 539
PATROL BORO BKLVN NORTH paD" 165
PATROL BORO BK~VN NORTH T/F PBSN TF 140 .
PATROL BaRD BKLVN soUTH PBBS 164
PATROL BoRa BKLYN SOUTH rtF POBS TF 139

PATROL BORD BKN NO DIV 13 PBDND13 713. (DORMANT COMMAND)
r,'
84
09/18/00 PAGE It 11
COMMAND LITERAL COHl!IAND COMMAND

LIT' CDDE
******* ******* (DORMANT COMMAND)
PATROL BORO OK" NO DIV 14 PBBNDltf 714
PATROL BORO OKN NO DIV 15 PBBND15 715 (DORMANt COMMAND)
PATROL BORO BKN'SO DIV 10 PBBSDI0 110' "(DORMANT COMMAND)
PATROL BORa OK" so DIV 11 POBSDn 711 (DORMANT COMMAND)
PATROL BOR~ BKN SO DIV 12 PBBSD12 '712 (DORHANT COMMAND)
PATROL BORO BRONX PDBX 163
PATROL DORD ax DIV 07 PBBXDD7 707 (DORMANT COMMAND)
PATROL DORO BX DIV 08 PBBXDOO 700' (DORMANT COMMAND)
PATROL BORO ax DIV 09 PB1\XD09 709 (DORMANT COMMAND)
PATROL BORn ox TIF PBBX TF 136
PATROL BORO MAN HORTH PBMN 162

. PATROL BORO MAN HORTH TIF POMN TF 137
PATROL BORO MAN SO DIV 01 PDMSDDI 701 (DORMANT COMMAND)
PATROL BORO HAN. SOUTH POMS 161
PATROL BORO HAN SOUTH T/F PBMS TF 136
PATROL BORD HN NO DIV Oq PBMNDOq 70Cf (DORMANT COMMAND)

PATROL BORO HN NO DIV OS PBHNDOS 70S (DORMANT COMMAND)
PATROL BORD MN NO DIV 06 PllHND06 706 (DORMANT COMMAND)
PATROL BORa I1N SO DIV 02 P.BMSD02 10Z (DORMANT COMMANO)
PATROL BORD MN SO DIV 03 PBHSD03 703 (DORMANT COMMAND)
'f
.:\'
PATROL BORO QN DIV 16 PBQND16 716 (DORMANT COMMAND~

PATROL BORO QN DIV 17 PBQND17 717 (DORMANT COMMAND)
PATROL BORD QN nIV 18 .PBQND18 710 (DORMANT COMMAND)
PA!ROL BORO QNS HORTH T/F PBQNT/F 170
PATROL DORa QNS sOUTH TIF PBQST/F 172
85
PAGE It 1Z

LIT CODe'
*~E)UE~*~UOE***~nE* ****.*** *******
PATROL BORO QUEENS PB'Q 166 (DORMANT COMMAND)
PATROL BORO QUEENS NORTH PDQ/N 169
PATROL BORO QUEENS SOUTH PDQ/S 171
PATROL BORD QUEENS TIF PDQN TF 1~1 (DORMANT COMMAND)
PATROL BORO 5/1 PBSI 447
PATROL BORO S/I DIV.19 POSID19 719 (DORMANT COMMAND)
PATROL SERVICES BUREAU p·s B 130
PAYROLL SECTION PAY SEC 355

POBH SCHOOL SAF.ETY POBN SS 785
PUN STREET CRIME UNIT P.OBN SC 187
POBS SCHOOL SAFETY PUBS 55 784
POBS STREET CRIME UNIT POBS SC 106
PBBX SCHOOL SAFETY PBBX 55 703
...
PBOX STREET CRIME UNIT paBX SC 163
POMH SCHOOL SAFETY PBMH 55 782
PBMN ST~EET CRIME UNIT PBMN SC 182

.rUMS SCHOOL SAFETY POMS 55 781
PBMS STREET CRIME UNIT PBMS SC 181
P8QN SCHOOL 'SAFETY PDQN 55 787

PDQ" STREET CRIME UNiT PBQN SC 184
PBQS SCHOOL SAFETY PBQ5 55 786
PDQS STREET CRIME UNIT PDQS SC 185
PBSI DET OPERS PBSI DO 448
PBSI SCHOOL SAFETY PBst 55 788
PBSI TASK FORCE PBS! TF G46
86
09/18/00 LISTING OF CO~MANQ~, tNcAlPHABEtIC ORDER PAGE tt 13

**~~***********~*****~*****************
LIT CODE
jf******JEJE****** ******* ***~***
PENSION SECTION ' PEN SEC 356
PERSONNEL BUREAU PER BUR 375
PERSONNEL IMTA UNIT ' POS PDU 39(j (DORMANT COMMAND)
PERSONNEL ORDERS SECTION PB pas 393
PHOTO UNIT PHOTO~U 20Cl
PLANT MANAGEMENT UNIT PLT MGT 370

POLICE ACADEMV POL AC» 384
POLICE ACADEMV TRAINING UNiT PAT U 552

.
POLICE CADET CORPS UNIT PCCU 363
POLICE COMH OFFICE PC0 500
PRINTING SECTION PRINTS 506
PROGRAM BUD BET SECTION PRG BUD 354 (DORMANT COMMAND)
PROPERTY CLERK DIV PROPClK 509
". ...
PSB FISCAL ANALVSIS UNIT
",'
PSB FAU 131 (DORMANT COMMAND)
PSB INVEST AND EVALUATION SECT PSB IES 132
PSB PROGRA~ LIAISON SECTION PSB PLS. 133 (DORMANT COMMAND)
PSB RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SECT. PSB RMS 127
PUBLIC E~ & RESOURCE LIAISON U P.E.R.L 507
PUBLIC INFORMATION DIVISION PIINFO 525 (OORMANT COMMAND)
PUBlI~ INQUIRV AND REQUEST SEC PIGREQ 612
QN CAREER CRIM INVEST UNIT QN CCIU 224 (DORMANT COMMAND)
QNS CENTRAL BOOKING QH C ~K' 589 (DORMANT coMMAND)
QNS COURT SECTION QNS CT 585
QUALITY ASSURANCE DIVISION lDC QAD IDe 498
QUARTERMAS.TER SECTION QM SEC 365
87
• 09/16/00 LISnNG OF eOHHANDS IN ALPHABETIC ORDER PAGE II '14

JOnE*JE***JEJE***iaE**JEJEJ!:lnE***~*************
t
f
COMMAND LITERAL COMMAND
tIT
COMMAND
CODE
r'
JOUE**JUUE9E*JUEJEJOE ******* *******
QUEENS DET AREA CRIM ID UNIT QDA CIU 312
QUEENS NORTH NARCOTICS ,DI'ST. Q/N-ND 542
,
QUEENS ROBBERY SQUAD QNROBSQ 347
QUEENS SOUTH NARCOTIcs ~IST. Q/S-ND 543
QUEENS tRAFFIC TASK ~ORCE TR/QTF 404
RECRUITMENT SECTION REC SEC 378
REGIONAL INTELLIGENCE CT~HIDTA INT RIC 317
.
5.1. ST.CRIME SUPPRE~SION UNIT 51 SCSU 437
S.I. STRATEGIC NARC.& GUN TEAM SNAG-SI 757 (DORMANT COMMAND)
SIX CRIMES VS PERSONS' SQD 51 PERS 449 (DORMANT COMMAND)
5/1 CRIMES'VS PROPERTY SQD SI PROP 439 (DORMANT COMMAND)
5/1 DA SQUAD DA Sll 444
SIX EMERGENCY SERVICES 51 EMER' 440
,-
5/1 HIGHWAY PATROL SI HWVP 442
5/1 NARC DISTRICT SIUARCD 756 (DORMANT COHMAHD)
",
SAT bET UPS BIN SATDOPS 904
:~
SAT HOUS OPS Bltl SATHOP~ 902 ':
'"
SAT HARC ors BIH ' SATNOPS 901
S~T PAT OPS BIN SATPOPS 903 (DORMANT COMMAND)
SCHOOL SAFETY DIVISXON S5 DIV 780
SCHOOL SAFETY INVEST UNIT S5 INV 789
SPECIAL FRAUDS SQU~D SP FRDS 212
SPECIAL INV DIV SP ItN 216
SPECIAL OPER. DIV. TAXI UNIT SOD T/U 180
SPECIAL OPERATIONS DIVISION S oD 436
88 ~::'.
J'
J' ,
~'
,
.,~ ,
I
-;.
~.
'j ~
:~
or'
:t,.
,:i.
.'i:
\~
09/18/00 LISTING OF COMKANDS.IN ALrHASETIC ORDER PAaE It 15
**~*****~~************~************* '"
,-
COMMAND LITERAL COMMAND COMMAND (
LIT CODE
*3UUE*********** IOEM**** ******* j
,.
STAFF SERVIce SECTION STAFfSV 379 '<
"
STATEN ISLAND C~URT SECTION 5.1. CT 443 .,.,-
STATEN ISLAND HoustNG UNIT SI"U 441
STATEN ISL.AND WARRANT SQUAD 51 WARR 434 (DORMANT COMMAND)
STObEN PROPERTY INQUIRY SECT S PIS 609
STRATEGIC & TACTICAL eMD BIN SAT DIN 900 ,. I
STREET CRIME UNIT. SC UNIT 128 (DORMANT COMMAND)

SUPPORT SERVICES BUREAU S SB 562 •..: "
SURFACE TRANSP. ENF. DIST. TRISTED 405 t;

TB HOH~LESS OUTREACH UNIT TB HID 876
Te PARKIN~ ENFORCEMENt DIST. TC PEn 681 .. -
;,
TECH. ASSIST. a RESPONSE UNIT T.A.R.U 505
,
TRAFF CONTROL BK INTERSECTION TC BKIN 691
"
TRAFF CONTROL BK SUMMONS ENF: TC BKSE 689
\
TRAFF CONTRO~ BX SUMMONS EMF. TC BXSE 868 i.
I'
TRAFF CONTROL INTEl.UNIT TC INTl 883 .;'

''i'
TRAfF CONTROL 'MAN I~TERSECTIDN TC MIN 890
';,
TRAFF CONTROL MAN SUMMONS ENF. Te MSE 886 >-
TRAFF CONTROL QNS INTERSECTION Te QIN 892 .",
TRAFF CONTROL QNS SUMMONS ENF. Tc QSE 887

TRAFF CONTROL S1 SUMMONS ENF~ TC SISE 438
TRAFF CONTROL TARGET TOW UNIT TARGTOW 895
TRAFF CONTROL TOW OPERATIONS I • TOW OPS 89~ (VORMANT COMMAND)
TRAFF CONTROL VIOLATION r~w ur TC VTOW 894
TRAFFIC CONTROL DIVISION TRF cn 135
89
09/18/00 LISTING OF COMH~Nn$ i~ Ak~~~~l~C ORDER PAGE D 16

*******************~***~*~* **********.
LIT CODE
*~nE************ ******* *******
. TRAFFICDIVISION . TRF DIV tiOO (DORMANT COMMAND)
TRANSITAUTHORITY LIAISON n LIAS 651 ~ ;'
TRANSITBORO BKLN TASK FORCE TO DKTF 675

, TRANSITBORO BRONX is ox 857
T~ANSIT BO~O BROOKlYR T8 UK 859
TRAHSITBORO BX TASK FORCE TB BXTF 673
TRANSIT BORO"MANH tASK FORCE TD MITF 872
TRANSIT BORO MANHATTAN T8 MANH 856
TRANSIT BORO QNS TASK FORCE 18 Q/TF 874
TRANSIT BORO QUEENS 18 QNS 858
TRANSIT BUR'. CRIME ANALYSIS' TB ClAN 853
TRANSIT nUR. INVEST. UNIT TB INV 852
TRANSIT BUR. SPEC. IHV. UNIT TB SIU '654
TRANSIT BUR. ,SPEC. OP S. UNIT TO SOU 879

\
TRANSIT~BUR. VANDAL UNIT

.. TO VAND 878 <;'
TRANS IT BUREAU T9 850
TRANSIT BUREAU DISTRICT 1 TB DTDI 860

TRANSIT BUREAU DISTRICT 11 TB DTll 864
TRANSIT BUREAU DISTRICT 12 TB DTlZ 865 '"
TRANSIT BUREAU DISTRICT 2 TB DTaZ 861

"
TRANSIT BUREAU .DISTRICT 20 TB DTZO 866

TRANSIT BUREAU DISTRICT 23 TB DT~3 8-67
TRANSIT BUREAU DISTRICT 3 TO DT03 862

TRANSIT BUREAU DISTRICT 30 18 DT30 868
TRANSIT BUREAU DISTRICT 32 TB D132 669

90
09/16/00 PAGE " 17

LIT CODE"
*JOOOE JaE*iEIUUUOUE ******* *******
TRANSIT BUREAU DISTRICT 33· TB DT33 870
TRANSIT BUREAU DISTRICT 3q T8 DT34 871
TRANSIT BUREAU DISTRICT 4 TB PT04 863
TRANSIT BUREAU ......

OTHER TB/OTR 880 (DORMANT COMMAND)
TRANSIT DIV. CANINE UNIT TD CAN 677 (DORMANT COMMAND)
TRANSIT PATROL QPERATIONS TI> DPS 855 (DORMANT COMMAND)
TRAHSPORTf\1'!ON BUREAU TRP BUR 8ti5 (DORHANT COMMAND)
ViCE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION VICE ED tj96
VICE.ENF.DIV. BRONX 'VED D~ 492
VICE.ENF.DIV. MANHATTAN NO~TH VEO MIN ti91
VICE.ENF.DIV. MANHATTAN SOUTH VEO" HIS tj89
VICE,ENF.DIV. QUEENS veo Q 493
VICE.ENF.DIV.BKlVN N SAT"COM VE BK/N 495
• 1. ••
VICE.ENF.DIV.BROOKLVN SOUTH/51 VE BSS! ti9tj

WARRANT SECTION WARRSEC 580
YOUTH DIVISION VTH DIV 166
001 DET SQUAD 001 DET 23ti
001 PRECINCT 001 PCT 1
001 SCHOOL SAFETV UNIT 001 SSU . 908
005 DET SQUAD OOS DET 235

.005 PRECINCT 005 peT 5
005 SCHOOL SAFETV UNIT 005 SSU 905.
006 DET S.QUAD . 006 DET 236
006 PRECINCT 006 PCT '6
006 SCHOOL SAFETV UNIT 006 SSU 906
91 ..J
'J
.::
':
";
09/18/00 LISTING~F COMMANDS IN ~LPHABETIC ORDER PAGE II 16

*********~**~*****~~****'***************
COMMAND LITERAL COHMAND COMHAND ,I
LIT COPE .:
***:IE******~~*3E *:IE***** **lE****
007 DET SQUAD 007 DET 237
007 PRECINCT 007 PCT 7.
007 SCHOOL SAFETY UNIT 007 SSU 907
009 DEf SQUAD ,009 DET 236
909 PRECINCT 009 rei 9
009 SCH~OL SA~ETY UNIT 009 SSU 909
010 PRECINct 010 rCT 10

010 SCHOOL SAFETY UNIT 010 ssu 916
013 DET S.QUAD 013 DET 240
013 PRECINCT 013 peT 13

014 PCT-MIDTOWN so. PCT Mrs PCi Iii
017 DET SQUAD 017'DET 242

017 rRE~INCT 017 peT 17
017 SCHOOL SAFE TV U~IT 017 ssu 917
OlB.peT-MIDTOWN NO. peT MiN peT 18

019 DET SQUAD 019 PET 245

020 DET SQ~AD 020 DET 246
020 PRECINCT 020 peT 2D
020 SCHOOL SAFETV UNIT 020 SSU 920 .~
023 DET SQUAD 02~ DET 246

92 ." . . ..... . ,r-l.
.. ·.·).. ,· 'c"':-·.·.,·: ~!~!~
" ...
I
,'.
)
..
'1
'J.
09/18/00 lISTING.Qf·Cq~~~KQ§.,IN,AlPHABETIC ORDER PAGE U 19

*~~:K****),E.MtE.*,JE.M~~fl~~*~*.****~~*~OE***:K**
COHMAND LITERAL COMMAND CDMMAND
. LIT CODe
*****.********* ****~** *******
023 SCHOOL SAFETY UNIT 023 SSU 9Z3
024 OET SQI,JAD OZ4 DET 249
024 PRECINCT , ;~ , .' 024 PCT 24
OZ~ SCHOO~ SAFETY UNIT Q2.~; SSU 924
OZS DET S.QUAD . o~-?~ Q.~T 250
025 PRECI-NCT . QZ'5 'pel

v .i' ;
I. ' - : '
25
02S SCHOOL SAFETY UNIT 02~, '5;5,U 925

026 DET SQUAD 026' DET Z51
028 DET SQUAD 028 DET. ~52
028 rRECINcr 028 PCT 28

02B SCHOOL SAFETY UNIT 026 SSU 928
.'. 030 DET SQUAD
" . .. '
030 DET 253
'.'

032 DET sqUAD 032 DET 254

033 PRECINCT 03~ PCT 3~
034 bET SQUAD 034 DET 255

'034 SCHOOL SAFETY UNIT 034 SSU 934
93
09/18/00 . LISTING OF CO.t1Hi\i~.D·S".IN ALPHABETI.C ORDER PAGE U 20

************~*~************************
LIT CODE
***~*********** ******* *******

o~o SCHO~L S~FETV UNIT 040 ssu 940
041 DET SqUAD 041 DET 26(j
041 PREOINCT 041 peT 41

041 SCHOOL SAFETV UNIT 041 ssu Cllf1
042 DET SQUAD 0'i2 DEl 265

D4Z SCHOOL SAFETY UNIT 042 SSU 942
04~ PRECIN.CT 043 PCT 43
043 SCHOOL SAFETY UNIT O~3.SSU 943

."
045 DEl SQUAD 045 DET 268
045 PRECINCT 045 PCT 4S

045 SCHOOL SAFeTY UNIT Oti5 ssu 9~5
046 DET SQUAD 046 DEl 269

04 6 PRECINCT 046 PCl ilf6 "
\~
047 DET SQUAD Oilf7 DET 270 , I

048 DET SQU/,D 048 DET 271
94
09/16/00 . LISTING OF COMMANDS ~lN ·AlPHABETIC ORDER PAGE It 21

**~***************~**~*****************
:LIT CODe
*************** ******* *******
.' .~

050 PRECINCT' 050 PCT 50
05Z DET SQUAD 05Z DET 273
052 P"RECINCT 052 PCT 52
052 SCHOOL' SAFETY UNIT 052 ssu 952
060 bET SQUAD- 060 DET 282

060 SCHOOL SAFETV UNIT
.. 060 SSU 960
061 DET SQUAD 061 DET Z83

062 DET SQUAD -062 DET 284

06~ DET SQtJAD 063 DEI 285


95
09/18/00 LISTING OF ~OMMANnS IN ALPHABETIC ORDER PAGE' It 22

.
**M~~*M~~***~M~***~****** . ••*********
COMMAND LITERAL COMMAND . COMMAND
LIT CODE
*JnE*****~*~*** ******* *******
066 SCHOOL ~AFETY UNIT 066 SSU 966
067 PET SQUAD 067 DET Z87
067 PRECI~CT .':.~ ,
067 PCT 67
067 SCHOOL SAFElY UNIT 067 SSU 967
; ....

066 PRECINCT
- 068 PCT 68
068 SCHOOL ~~FETY UNIT 068 SSU 968
069 DET SQUAD 0,69 DET 289 '
070 VET SQUAD 070 DeT 290
070 PRECINCT 070 P,CT 70
070 SCHOO~ SAFETY UNIT 070 SSU 97P
071 DET SQUAD 071 DET Z91
071 PRECINCT 071 PC! 71
. 072 DET SQUAD on DEl 292
072 PRECINCT on peT 7.2
072 SCHOOL SAFETY UNIT on ssu 972

073 SCHOOL SAFETY UNIT 073 ssu -973
075 DEl SQUAD 07S DgT 296
075 PRECIN~T 075 pC-r 7S
075 SCHOOL SAFETV UNIT 07S ssu 975
"
;
96
I
I
D9/18/00 LISTIN9 of. COMMANDS IN ALPHABETIC ORDER PAGE ft' 23
**K~*****K*****************************
~,
Ltl CODE
~; *************** ******* *******
076 DET 293
l 076 DET SQUAD
~,
076 PRECINCT 076 peT 76.
,- 077 DET SQUAD 077 DET 297
;.
, rJ77 PRECINCT 077 PCT 77

I,
~.

078 DET SQUAD 076 DET 29,.
.,"
078 PRECINCT' 078 PCT 76
078 scHOOL SAFETY UNIT 078 SSU 976
if
~
i! 079 SCHOOL SAFETY UNIT 079 SSU 979
i' 081 DET SQl.'AD 081 DET 299
f 081 P.RECINCT 081 PCT 81
r.;- OBl SCHOOL SAFETY UNIT 081 SSU 981
g. OB~ DET SQUAD 083 DET 300
( 083 PRECINCT
083 SCHOOL SAFETY UNIT
083 PCT
083 ssu
83·
983
~
1<,
084 PRECINCT 084' PCT
OQ.4 SSU
Btl
984
~; 064 SCHOOL SAFETY UNIT
08~ DET 3.01
f'"~
0841H DET SQUAD
~
~
't': 988
088 SCHOOL SAFETY UNIT 088 SSU
"r,'. 088 DET 302
f..l' 088TH DET SQUAD
,~. 90
;; 090 PRECINGT 090 peT
r:
I~
i,
~
97
09/18/00 LISTING OF(COHMAHDS IN ALPHABETIC ORD.~R PAGE II 24

*********************~****~*****~~*****
LIT CODE
~unE***)E***:lE~~** **~**** *******
090 SCHOOL ~AF.EJYU"IT 090 SSU 990
090T" DET S~UAD 090 DET .303

094 SCHOOL S~fETV UNIT 094 SSU 994
094TH IlEl,SQUAD 094 DET 304

lOOTH OET SQUAD 100 DET 330
101ST. DET SQUAD 101 DET 331
102 PRECINCT 10Z peT 102
IDZ SCHOOL SAFETY UNIT 102 ssu 762
". . " .. 102 DEl 33Z
lO~HD DET SQUAD

103RD DETECTIVE SQUAD" 103 DET 333
104 PRECIHCT 104 peT lOt;
104 SCHOOL SAFETV UNIT lOll SSU 164

Ion" DET SQUAD lOt; DET 33.t;

10STH DET SQUAD ~P5 DET 335
106 P.RECIIfCT 106 P~T 106

"
106 SCHQOL SA~ETV UNIT 106 ssu 766
98
09/18/00 LISTING OF COMMANDS IN AtPHABETIC ORDER PAGE # ZS

***************************************
LIT CODe.
********Ji:****** ******* *******
lO6TH. DET SQUAD 106 DET 336
107 PRl:CINCT 107 PCT 107
107 sqHOOL SAFETY UNIT 107 ssu 767
107TH DET SQUAD . 10.7 DET 3'37
100TH DET SQUAD 108 DET 338
109 ~CHOOl SAFETY UNIT 109 ssu 769

110 P.RECINCT 110 peT 110
110 scHooL SAFETY UNIT no SSU 770
III PRECINCT
.• 111 PCT 111
111, SCHOOL SAFETV UNIT 111 SSU 771
III TH DET SQUAD 111 DET 3tjl

112 SCHOOL SAFETY UNIT 1.12 SSU 772
·112TH bET SQUAD llZ DET 342

113 SCHOOL'SAFETV UNIT 113 SSU 773


;,
~,
99
, ,
, .
~
• . /..... ~ . ·'t ~.:-'1;: '.; ,

09/18/00 PAGE # 26
COHMAND LITERAL COMMAND COMMAND

. LIT CODE
~uuouoounonOOOOE
******* *******
115 P.RECINCT 115 peT lIS
11S'StHOOL SAFETY UNIT 115 SSU 775
1l5TH DET SQUAO 115 DET 345
120 DETECTIVE SQUAD 120 PET q~n

120 SCHOOL SAfETY .uN.IT . 120 SSU 995
122 DETECTIVE SQUAD 122 DET ~32
122 PRECINCT lZ2 PCT 122

. 122 SCHOOL SAFETY UNIT 122 SSU 996
123 DETECT~VE SQUAD 123 DET 433
123 P~ECINCT 123 rCT 123
THERE ARE 637 COMMANOS OW"FILE

99 OF THESE ARE DORMANT
100
.' "
'.
:
REVISION NI,I~~~ ,;1 P,(OE: '
. 10f4
-l·t :~':.' t~,· :·~('.··~.:.~,}t:~";:/)-~."~l{. .'\'i_~i,~~i~, .-
l :PURPOSE To proCess P~rSOns':irrest~ for operating a vehicle while under 'the'influence of

,,'F alcohblordiu~,".:":"',' """,1 0• • ' .
0--
~~ . .~~ . :!.'.:.~~ ~.~~J..'\ ~JJ.I.,:' ... \.):~. '":. . .'- •
~,PROCEDURE 'Upon ~tiJlg "a"P~n for operating 3' vehicle while under the influence of
, "ill" t' "'~ . ~.. . ' :
.id~. o.. "'.?!.: .... &S.~'4:
",
.:,:~. ,'.
•
".• ,'; : , .
'. ,','i"'-
'
..
ARRESTING' ,~'. 1.;',,; " \R.rni6~fffsOl\et"to.stBtiophoUSe, p~ of arrest, ~ comply with pertinent

OFFICER"- :~'p~ :','
'j: • ;~ :. ,': '. ',' : ....
'. ~',:, :.. ~. j~ffic:erw1U' yo~chet;:as e~dence. any credit card
.' ',', , ' , receiptS 'froin.'4 ~t stop :frbD1';'reStaunmts; bars, ~.t found on
,-.. - 'thc:prisoner'during'the Se8J:ch. .
DESKOFFICIt.R. 2." . _ Yerify,~ ':' . ";c,:;, . . ', '.. ' ;',"/"" ,... ,;;,.',' , . ,.
:PRECiNcr OF·'·I-·'·3~' . pitJct.~ "meet"to reCwesfCo'mmUId~tioDS Section to dispatch
ARREST . ' . .Highw.y Dis.triet perso~el.to. t~~ing.location. . ' .
a. "State"time of arTest.~h~nniaki~$iequest,
'NOTE :¥!&c::ftrm.sr.,fUSZ;·BE,APMINlSTE~b WrtHIN TWO (2) HOURS. DE
• •• • .... ,,-. ~ ,., • ,,.. .' : . I, • .' .' ~..' •
AIUmsrlNG .4. . . Prepare ON' ltttm.. BOOKlN9 ~;:YS~M ARREST WORKSHEET

OFFICER (pDZ44-159)~.. .. . '.' .
¥~: .
m..
,. -DESK OFFICER S. Direct arresting officer-to remove prisoner, in a ,Department vehicle. to
~ . PRECINCT OF designated testing location. .'.
t!t ARREST ~ Assign adequate personnel to escort prisoner, depending on circumstances.
~~1 6. Make entry iD:'CommaridLOg of: .' :' :
a, ' 'Identity ofarrestitl'g officer and DepartI1)~n~ vehicle used
b~ , ~.dentity· and pew~~: 9f pri:i<;>ner;.·.. ' :.'.' , •
7. Have pnsoner's vehicle reni.oved to precmctofa,rrest for safeguardmg.
. ' .
N(JTE. A. vehicl.e.IJlIlY be r~~eaSt;!!toJlt;ensert,qpl5,ra~o~4esi~i~ifw the prisoner if:
a.Vehic1e nOfw~pn.~.qlez.~m.;. .c.: ""f~o.h~wasin lawjitlpossession
b. VelUde not requiredos evidence d... . .. .,ve#.lq/e not ~ject to forfeiture
Ifvehic/e is not released withln/Qrly-eighJ (48) hours~ have vehicle removed to Property
Clerk's sloragefacility. . ".: .:', .; '/::
~. :.~
ARRESTIN(; 8.
'.' •
R~rt, With.pris(jn~~, 'to desk offic~i

. . ,r.,1
• • ",.
•.• '
, -.'
•
, • • • ;,.-4.'
.
I
at t~ting location.
••" "
",
• "
OFFICER
~ESK OFFIC~R 9.· Make Command Log entry of preSence of arresting officer and prisoner.
TESTING' 10. Verif)' that Highway Distriqt ,has been notified.
LOCATION
ARRESTING 1i ~ Conduct' e;amination of pri'~oner Q~ .three (3) copies of INTOXICATED
OFFICER 'DRIVER EXAMINATioN (PD244-154) and complete entrie~ lip t(l
caption "Coordination Test. n
• ,..., '_ • r' ,. .".r '" .:~ .. t . '.,
NEW • YORK • CITY • POLICE • DEPARTMENT

101
LD.T.U. 12. Inform prisoner, with arresting officer as witness, of the follow'.
TECHNICIAN. stateme.nt, v~atim: .;, ..." :,: ' . . .
"You have been arrested for driving \\'hil~ intoxieat~ I am here to cond
a chettrlca1 breath test to dctem:dne ~e p,resence or absen,c.e qf a109~q!
, . yout'blood. fnOwi'equest tDa(ydu' submit. to the chemical test of ..
breath. Ifyou refuse to submit to the chemical ~ or any portiontb
.,wiI.l·~t in. tP-e,4P.m~$ ~ion, and $Ubsequent revocation.of
license or operating prlvi1eg~,;wP..~ pr·:not you are found guilty, ofi·,
cba;gesJQr wbi9h YOU; htiv~ ~ anested. Your refusal. to submit
~epnoaL test, 0t.l;ulYPQxtion ~t; can be introduced in evidence
you at any ~~ proce¢ing·Of b~g ~ting from this arrest."
. ..
I.D.T.U. 13. !nfOml··.. pnsoner, With·: arreSting officer as Witness~ of the follO'~
TECHNICIAN statement verbathn:';· :.,. '. ", .'
"You have been mested for driving while intoxi~~ I am here to con·
a chemical teSt to det~e the Pr.e.sCm~ o~ absence of alcohol or dru
yo.vr blood., Yo~ may"take.~e test'or ~fuse to do so. Will you ~mi.
chemicld teSt tciaet~e tli(i~~hoV&ug content oeyour blood?" '; .~!
NOTE If the prisqner indicates th!zJ he:will consent to the chemical test, then the test· ~"
.;
administered. . . ...i1
"
:. 14. Administer chemical test to p,tisoner. ,
'.
~:
15.. Con~uct "Coordi,n~on Test" of.prisoner, in presence of arresting offi
fl.,
(.
and ~oml?l~~~ ..... approppate cap~ons on INTOXICATED D
~,
",
EXAMINA.-AIO~o<
':;
NOTE In the event thilt the 'exfmtination ofihe prisoner etuuiot be videotaped. the desk 0 '.
testing location. will siijJirriilsit 'iM ixiun1nai1On.' . .
I '. ~.;' "'1 • :'::' i :
16. Provide arresting officer with a copy of' CHEMICAL

ANALYSrS (PD244-063). .
17. Enter r~ults ,of eX:~i.~qn ~f _prison~r in appropriate captions of._
(3) COPies ofINTOXICATED-D'RIVER EXAMINATION report. ,.,
a Sign fonn and have arresting officer sign form.
b. Desk officer, testing,.location, will also sign fonn if exarniitii
was not videotaped. . 'f
NOTE If a prisoner. lIilder.the age ojtwenty-one (21), has a chemical test reading oj.Ok·
s
.05%. tire arre,s:b: officer and' f.D. T., U. ,1~cJlIIiCi(m wil{ cOli/ply with appiif,
provislolL'i oJ P.G. :08·41. "Arrests - Person Under TW(!J1ty-OIU: Operating A '
Vehicle After f{O\'it:i: COllsumed Alcohol", .
NEW - YORK • CrTY -POLICE • DEPARTMENT

102
-ARRESnNG
OFFICER
ADDITIONAL
DATA
Patrol Borough Manhauan North 'QhiISoutli';: " ~ 2Et'- Precinct
Patrol Borough Bronx '. - . - ._.i '\:: : : . -;, . ' '-41s( Precinct
Patrol Borough Brooklyn NO'"ili and-:Sciuth"' - , '7~h Precinct
Patrol BOrQug!FQueens : -::., .-. 112'" Precinct
Patrol Borough Staten L'iJa/ld /20'h Precinct
NEW • YORK • Crry • POLICE-· DEPARTMENT

103
,','~ ~ PAGE:'
~1i1tt~=::J:~Jt:==~~:·:
APDITIONAL
DATA <
(contlnued) ,. delivered by'tM ar1_of/ietir.,4P.,~~,~ District A1tlJmey ~ '!te C«trp/bfnl Room.".

~n¢zine ,is P.w1!W!!?~~{lfjtpf ~ ivJt1dtEJWna/qJpymIlbejJreparedjiJrthls
'. .". . , . '
lja pris~ner 'ti4u'esa'
to eo;tMr Wiih ~ Dflomey prior to subrnlttlng to a Chemical
he orshe will ~ allowed ~ch (;.OIISt#t4lion prqvlded it ,wJlI,nat delay 1M adm1nJs~
oftHe tist ~~h';i the: tWo' (ij '/Jow"./imit:mandllted' bj: i~ Vehicle tmd Trajftc ,
,~n ,u?~.,lt $~oufd ~&.~9!¢ ~,~ .l!:~!l.gat!o(1o to':aUow contact with an atiorn~
. 1/!,ggVid o1i!y b.Y t/Je ,~~.~ ,~p.rPfi!; r,eqpest' ,to 40 so'. ~ is' Il() o~!lgaliDn,
;iifOT,!i' .t1J~Rri:tp~er. »nor.!(>. 'the ~!f 11## M /1l!!Y. wnsult WIth an attorney if Ite or £
. wisJias io';.ln addltion;'1hetitlim offhi sifvlceidsigMd tq the IntOXic:ated Driver res
s
uni/wlJl recqr,Une'P(Is'qne,"r reqJ1S~ to'cilhSiiJ! ,with tin·Q/torne.y and the reason, if.
'. for dettJqJ of$l1id.~lln·~~;4.t!J1mTY ~'OG (pD112..14S).
Members o/the sf!Tvl~sltoidiI'be ~e, ~~ a mOtOrist~, qCel;fe may ~ be sus. ,
. ",I
or rivokeil jOr fallr;ri'«J~intt;t; d'~; iiii'cC;_tednwre than two (2) , ,
'. ,·!'after'ti#I!st. In;iliiiudoif i/ie'1:qptiliiit tM~ikJtcri$t hi)LsidJ td submit 10 chemical tes "
be,ondt1tit>tWortJlt~tJr.#fiiJll}~i:~'lfgl.~~'i!sid~:eVi~ce
-~ ;':'. ; .' ."...~.. ~ .J: •"'.. j,:.':.~ '.t.- ' .. '," .:.~... ," •.. . . ~,";f"~'l
in a lazu prosecutIon:"
•
,Ifa pmoner:m:iu4s~ioJ,.e,teiti!dft:n;'b1Jo:ricaPon by hiS peno11tJl Physicitm. me rest will

beaIloweduntN tli'e D~n'knrtisting ,has been 'conijieted. 1/ the prisqner rP/Us~,
~:
, . i~~~tts~~'.,~.~n4l,·"tese';'~l'?f!tit":
. ' .. - P ..il1.... 'A~~.'J,~,.'!ff;li~,o~,~m.;nCo.=~ 0:,";r
Pb1on(l,~,~vell~,~
'. ,t;;Li.,_." ,W~-1t
-J
the tesfgiVerl :bj thifPH,Si:um ii'i)d' ... '~~t]iQllin .enby be made in the~'M .:
[Y, .•
section ofthe ONLIN:B BOOKING.$fSTJ!MAi¢B$T WORKSHEET and o;,:tlr8filel

ofthe.IN.r(f)'N1eA.1JBI){DimtER~A·Ti:ON.' 11ii: ent7y will include the name"
~ afthephySician and the time. ana
dtitetHe· test was given. 1/the test ~ CtJnductedat'
dete.nJion' or. c~tral booking: facility, the' desk officer thereo.t will make a telepha
notiftaztion to tire precincHJj'tJacurrencefor JJze~iri/Ofniation 01the arresting o.fficer. When
prisoner arrested for priving While'IntoxicaJedlItr1JX!ire4 JshospitaJized. normal t' .,
procediUes wiUbelollowed and the FtighWflY DfstricltechniqicUJ lviTl respon4 to the MS
td'co~t appropriate t~. "My blOodsample ~\ledftom'the prisoner wiD be pen
sealed;- niar'hid and i:WJ'?tredto the Po/ke btboratory'by the Highway DistricJ tecJtniciI:uL
." prisoner ~ed' witJrviolatiiJrr. afYehlCle' 'and traffic i..tJ:w. $iCii.ons Jl92 (I), (2), (3) or
or
shaJitJiitOe'eJigiblejoFa Pe.sk'AP~'t!dret siadbnJu)use bal' unless suchpriso
is ~fo.r~'!#;.!Jum fW!!.1IIJ'-.kw , a.41.M~~ r:$uch priJolW' may ~~,f1: , .
Appearance Ttcket. ifelJgif,le, w~er or nat heSJilmit!.ed 10 a chemical test. " .",
• ' f. ," .' ,0' • • ".
RBUTBD Mease OfPrispnen· Getertll Procedure (p,G. 2iO:'/3) ,

PROCEDUREs Arrests - Perso.ns U.nd~r' 'twerzry-.Qtie;·, O~raJing A MaiOI'
ConsumedAlcoho/(P,G,208-41)
" , ..
- j'.
FORMS AND , ACTIVITY LOG (PDlI2-145)

REPORTS CHEMICAL TEST ANALYSIS (PDU4-063) '
CHEMICAL rEST REFUSAL (PD244-H5) .
INTOXiCATED DRiVER EXAMINATION (PD244-154) .
ONLINE 800K/f....C S}'STEM ARREST:WORKSHEEr (Nj14.f-159)
NE\rY • YORK • CITY • POLICE, • DEPARTiVIENT

104
,PATROL GUIDE '.
DATE ISSUED;,: ". ," '. b~" .: REvISION NUMBER: PAGE:

ol/old~b9 ' . :'.if.\fuJ~ 10f4
To p~\.P.~Ps·<q~~e.d pmsuant to Section 1192-a of tlie Vehicle and

Traffic Law; for the purpOse of administering. a chemical test.
• • '. '1--: ~";,~ _ • '
SCOPE Pursuant to S.~o~~}~~ police offi~ ~ ~rarilydetain a D;l9~~}{Opgger

of
thaQ' tWetif1-6hC:atj'years ag~'for 'the purpose ofadniinisterlng a ch~,ra1:':~
upon reasonable grounds to believe that individual is operating a ~otor veh,icle the
aftet ~Vihg COIisUm~ alcohol The ~·defineSxeasonab1e grO~ as: .' ,
~ -" ' "". '_ " l., :~ " ' '_ ' ~
·'Thc~~1ilitY'of·t1ie'cilclJ31~ Suifu'ifiidin'i'the incident wbioh,when taken
together, indis:ate that the o~or was d9-ving .,~. violation: of such subdi.vision
.'" '(VrC ': 1192-aji' Suc1f,·cireu.tn.$tarices 'may~ 'irldlude artY vislole,' or .behavioral
indicBtion of alcohol consumption, by tli~(op~rhor, the existence of an Open
, co~iaJn~ C?n~ or·having e6~ed ~J»~pt ,~~~eragc in or aro~ the
·i'diic1e,drl,:"cn. by' t:h,co~r,. o~"~~',:.o~, e'1gence s.UIIOundmg the
ciituiIistance of the incident which mdicates that the op~or has been operating
a· motor vehicle. haVing cOnsumed 81oo1l01at the nme ofthe incident"
.<;"',:::: i ~ i t . , ~'. ~ _ ./.~",.~. "'7' :.1; •
PROCEDURE UpOl). .dc;~g ..a,persQ1':lt und~ twen!:Y-Qpe~(21) years of ~e, for operating a
niotor vehiole.after, cWJ$'uming alCQhol;. ... ',..: '
I ," '. ,. ." .• '. . . .'
.
D~TA;lNlNG I. r¢o~, ~ee ~f aUtP.9~t!~,~d,.tc;aU;,S,e. of dttention, unless physical.
OF~l'CER resistan~,·tligbt,
or otb,e.diwt9,IS render;this action impractical.
2. Handcuff detainee with hands behind back. '
3. rnim~iately .~k 4~~F,for We3pQDS (NQTfor.e'{i~ce or contraband).
4. Remove detaiilee tQ $tatlonhousel precinct ofoccurrenc.e.
w ... " .~. ' . . . ' " . ~ ~ ,. ••
DESK OFFICER, 5. V;~fy. t,hat 4'e~i~g ~t;ficer made"'a'l8:~~ful stOp of detainee 'and that
PRECINCT OF detainee violated Seeijo.p. 1.l9Z:-a, of the Vehicle and Traffic Law.
OCCURRENCE 6. Direct 'd,e~gt9fft~e.r: f~ .~#luis~ that Communications Division dispatch
HjghwafDiSt.r;ici P,~~9i¥t~~: ~o ~~t£ng lo~ion., -,-
S. " State time'ofdetent1.oJl
, . ,I '
wh~n
. \'
making request
. NOTE THE iff~ff.;d!;;
THE :AR OF rE
,TffffrlfflST
ION.
~E.,AD~STEJ~~P1:"fYfflf!N
,,: . '. ,_. .', .' ,;
TWO (2) HOURS OF
> i*"· ;' , " _.(, .' ~ , • • ~.... • ' ••" • " •• -.
7. Direct de~ing ~ffi~ to .~?y~..g~~n.~. in a Department vehiclel to

the designated t~ng IC?cati?,~., ,(Sel!J:'.~ G., 208-40. "Arrests - Into:cicated
Or Impaired DriVIng"). ','. '.
a. AsSign adequate'PerSOnnel t6~tt detairiee: depending on circumstances.
. 8. Make entry inCommarid Log dr';·'.,;:'l ~..,.
a. 'Identity of detaining'offlcercilia Dep~rlmeht vehicle used.
b. ldentity and pedigree' o(~det3inee. .: .. .
9, '. Have detainee 's. vehicl~ removed tt> p~~inct ofoccurrence for safeguarding.
i~ ,
105
... .. , 1• 'i""' . -. ";,.,., " ~, l :. ~ t"~~ \l ' l " , ~
NO'!E A v~le may be''''eI~ed to.liC§1J$ed o~~tor desi~e4 by the priSoner /fi,' , , ,:~: ' " h
a:. .';" Vehicle not wanJedt>,nM titqnn c. , Prisoner was in lawfid~ion'"
b. , Vehicle not r.equired os' e11UWu:e. d.·.·VehiClitnot subject to folfeifUre.
, . ' '. " , " c' . ;"} "
Uvehicle is not reJeast/:hvithinjOrty.eighl (48) hours. have vehicle removed to PlOp'
Clerk"s:storagefacility. , ".:
DETAlNlN~ I O. Report with .d~tain~ to des~ offit:er. ~t testing location.

1. . '
OFFICER
• ,. • . .' • 0 . . . : , . :• . ' •
. . 'j ~ - ~. ,. ~. .
DESK OFFICER, 11. ~e.,Co~and:I..og enny of presence of detaining officer and ~etaineel
'TESTING '
12. Verify thatHi8hwayD,~~ct,~
.:..i '~'..: .
~~,n()~~,.,
";. :.? ';' \.," U. :~ ...." .•'
• • ' .
.
LoCATION !
LD.T.tJ. 13. ~~
• .~ro
' 'f~le~~~,~~¢o~. SIJ.~~ ~d perform chemical test 0
~CHN1:~
. " dt?~~r"
•. ,,'b' :,':,. ',' .: .... ' ; . :~.c,'. , : . ,'::;
~ B D
'OF :02%,mmQUGH ~05%;'C()MPtY'WI11I:nwf(;)tt:QWING
f, ~,f.:t;;.:~.,: .;~ ..~~\... ~'.' l,..-t:i;''''!f~· ....: ,...., ~,::.>: .. ~f.1'~.~i·f .,.,~ .. ,.~'.
SIEI1
. " ~
DETAINING 14.' ~ p• . J;l~4~, ~~ Hearing, (Op~radng; a Motor Vehicle Afte

OFFICER Consummg ~eoh~l) (AA~13:~1).. " _,., ;' {';
15. Select a·:t1eanng date tWo '(2J~ thirty (30) days subsequent to the t ,
date, Mondiy lhrouth FridaKex6iudfug l~gar li'~lidaYs. ',.'
..., , . ',. . , " >' : r . " . 1.: :.~
,NOTE The hearingdati!mustlJ'e compatible 'with 11Je rJe'f/lintng officer"s schedule. The detliI,-
wilE be directtd'to i'e$pon'dto.the Secondj1oi/r 0/19 ~eClor Street. New Yo,*" N~ }l;
at J300 noun on the dD;t'e $el~ed by th.t!detii'ining officer. . .
.. . • "." " " . .. "." j'" ".. ',_ ,:- I ~~"" ••; .. " - : ....' ' •• " I
the delainee's lic:ense will nofbii ~pituJ¢pe1i4fng the administrative hearing,

I.D.T.U. i6. p~videihe d,~~,:offic~~.~4ll)~ d;~ee with a copy of the foUowiQ,i'
TECHNICIAN' a:. ',. Uro 'tol~ra:ti~~1nstrucUon Sheet .,;~
IS. ' liistrdmetlt i6iUbri6~ti sil~~ti'J :
c. . 0 p"ii",t~f
.~_ " ,.' ,~, ,-7, \..'
!c~ititt.'~'ti~t4),Sh~r' ,'
',..
d. - r:t~ti~~,;p.~!i~gJ9:~iaithg·~'~~tor Vehicle After Co~
','; I Alcohol):'" '--' , :.
NOTE. The:'diuainlng office;. \~ill bring a copy J)ffllI ~~jOrms. Listed. in step 16. to t.
hearing, unless the hearing is wtiiwid. ...,. ,':. ,,: .' .. .
17. Fo~&d origInal and: on'e (1 r~6py ofall documents/forms prepared to til
fIighway OiStrlct ~6cedle(L ,,' , ;,~
'. I' • .' .••
NOTE J't member of the Hig}nv,ay P(slrlct, willJ,arward original copy o[ all forms/documen
prepared to the Ne,w York s.tale Depar.lI!tf;flt ofMotor Vehicles within twenty--four (14
hou~.
. and w~ll hpve
.
~ ~:..
'remaining
..:'
".
copies
..
of
'..
diJcwnents/forms filed in command. .
.-', '.
..
~ /. - ,
IF THE DETAINEE REFUSES THE CHEMfCAl. TEST

DETAINING 1,8. PrepareNo~i~e- ~( Che~icat Test Refusal Hearing (Person Under Ag';
OFFICER 21) (DMV 137.-\) and Refusal to Submit to a Chemical Test (AA 134·3).
19. Select a h~~ing dale lWO (2) to thirty (30) days subsequent 10 the lcf
<.lule. MOll(by lhmugh Frid"y. excluding legal holidays. ':
NE\V· YORK • CITY • POLICE. • DEPARTMENT
106
: P~1;ROJ;., GUIDE
" 'ROCEouRitNml~~<,/\ ljA1't{
:~0t4f :", ..
; NOTE
t' "DETAINING
! OFFICER
..
(~onnn:ll~)
~. .
'I.D.T.U. . ··l'"
TECHNICI:AN
',NOTE
" '
," - ,
, ,
i
LD.T.U.. Advise the detaining officer of the reading.
. "',,~. '~
TECHNICIAN . • • ;... • ~ .1
. . ~
DETAINING 23. Arrest de~ee an(r~haxie die individ~~l with the ap~~;ri~t~ Vehicle
OFFICER and Traffic LaW section, based upon the reading obtained pursuant to the
( 1 J92·~ Chemical Test- .', '. . ,I.;
"
1 24. Conduct inqUiry to determine the location.from which the detainee was served
a. . ·If positive,info~ationreceived; rto.ti~ die ,Intelligence Division
and comply with P.G. 212-12. ':Cltyjri?f1nlelligence Reporting
s..vStem...~· . :, ..
~:•. ":." "t\ .
.. ;~,.,. ; ; .••• :~.~.~. ,',.:t.• , .... :·td.~',
NOTE In addition to the tdx:1ve requIreJt1e!llS•.'lftt:...i4~4ipe.ela~f!$lee will be' processed in
accordance with current arres.~pro,cf.SU:tg procedures CZ$weli as P.G. 208-40, "An-ests·
Intoxicated Or Impaired Drivirzg. " .
ADDITIONAL Since an ,individual who violates this SlalWe is deiained rather than arrested, an
DATA individua/who resists detention 'or atlempls to escape a lalVju( stop would be subject 10
arrest/or Obstructing Governmental AdminIslralion (SeC/ion 195.05 ofthe Penal Law
fA Misdemeanor]) rather than Resisting ATTest.
Ifa delainee reqllests to be rested/or intoxication by h~ Personal physician. the test uill ~Ol be
nI/01~'(?d until the Department testing has bee" romplated. If the detainee refuses the
administration ofa chemica/lesl by this Depal1lnent. he/she \/ill 1'101 be allowed to haW! a rest
(/(lmilll:'iJc:red />.\. (1 personal ph)'sician, nIt:: tI(·.~k ojJic:er, testing l<lC'Otirm. I\il/ pe~'onal~,' \\~'(II(>S.'
Ille lest giV(!/: by a physician (ltlli lvill direct tiwi III<: dewining C?t/icc/· document tile /~llolI'ing
il!foI7lJotiol/ ot: the ,file copy ofthe Zero Tnlcrance 111.~1rucrio/l Shl:t::t: name, (uldrCJS, ldcphof!L'
Illilll"el' (ifpl;,\','L'ioll. (lI1~1 rhe time tmel rit l/L'lhL'/JII,\:\'jr;itl1l ot!m;'listl'r(u/ fire test, '
. . " ." . / ."
:'iE\V,'· "YORK • CITY • POLICE • DEPARTMENT

107
. ...., .'
~AmOLGUIDE
" .". .
, '".' ''', -.~,.
:<Jn8-4f '" '. ' . 61,iJ
~
", "ro~' ",
ADDITIONAL At the ,Departme1J1 of.Mptor Y.eJzic/e· hearing; .~~detlIInIni' officer must be to :; di;'e'
D~TA.' P1Y?vitliC/~ pnd:cb~ariiJenc,r on', the/ollowlng,Jisues:. .~
(contitiuedi a. The motor.i.r4. WM war tlet4ined..;()~1IufmOtbflvehlcle. . ;
b. & 'valid retpli!St m:rs'~ l!Y:f!!e J'Ol.!~ \oJJ1.qer to submit to a rrhemical tesl. (U:~
. iovideiI in $eCtiijfi lJ94 oftM,Yehii:lildnd Tiidftc Law. , ' -' •
Co " ' ~,ttJ()~orist Wlz1 unt1er ~~Jiyem 0/age at ~ hme of/M'mcitfe:¥ '~
d.', .' The cheiniCaltes'ttwdspr6per!fdt11n1nistered'in accordance with sknon 1194 oj
. the, Yehic1smI(J:TMjJU:-L:iw. i : • .' .~, ,i:,,' ." ' , ~
e. '. 11"-;~ testcondud¢, th/it: the mOtorist had opertrted the motor vehJcle. afteii,
, J¥Mngot?nsumea a1coho' os ~,~.Secdo.IJ.1I9.2-a ofthe Yehk/e and T.JAW~ ,
, . t . "'i:M'iiilttidito]i'lifiheiiibtliTlsI:Wili'lit;vjiit'·" '. :. ".'.:" ",.'
.. ..i:··
·,:,,",-~··.r·}·.·J,:~7-.; "j~;f·j· .~I·~~;"!:: .' ,~ .•
![the ~8. '?~ faJ#, ':'J.. a~ ..al,tM heming or fails to b~g ClJpiesrO/1zl1.'
~~rjtii 1!r.~e4 ~.~~~1M rfl!)fOrl!& may ,be dismJsse{! ".
• . ' • • #t·~.~ .,.. < _ \\i}l: " •., ...: ~ .. l, t,: ,:.,". ':. ~l;'" :';',,,, • "~- '. • ... ,
1/a penon operates 0. motor vehicle ,~,~ lU;en$c ,Is susptlJ(kd or revoked as tile;
result of a Set;tfon 1192-4.ftndin& ,,!he .11I{J!:QT#t.maybe i:ht.uged with ~
Un1icltnsed,~o'tt.in.:th!t ~'nd~:Siitiljfn 5.1J(J) ofth4 Yehlcle and Trqfftc. LaW.L
. 7,,: ';~~J.~-- II. ::~~_;t.t_J1~,. I,,· " . ' ;'!.
A.~en.t an emergeMy. a h~ng ~te. Sx~,QUl{l.noJ Qe rescheduled. lift becomes nec,w '"
to rtJf.~e a hetv!tsg.: t.k.6..1Jelh.biif6~Ws.~~ ~n request thaJ the hearing b
. ," Jij,;tJi~' DiPrJititilid:
. .'Ji,riti"g:-
resCheduled "by , . /,...
.OJ,Motor ~fI'-eh1cles.
~ . Safety and BusinG
Heanng.:Bureau; ~oom~21l0i$rhiife. p~ lfe.w ,York,:12228. or the command may caL.
' ... .
t~;$jift.tY:'ai1d.fJusui~~ii.JjufedU aJ~jj~J 474-iSo9:' ' " ;~

'.
. ,,_. -!.~ .. :~;' ~::< t'.,
RELATED ' Release O/Prlsoners • General Proce4ures (p.G. 210-13)

PROCEDURES Arrests -IntoxicQted Or Impaired Driiving (p. fl. 20840)
• .. _ : f . .J- • ' ~~: " .:~. j • • , .. '<... .". ' .
, ". .' ';" :', " '.' /
FORMS AND NOTICE ofHEA.RING (O,ERATiNG:a M,OTOR VEmCLE AFTER CONSUMiflCl!

REPORTS ALCOHOL)'(M;-13 Ul)' , . ,j' "'.'. , , ' , '
NOTICE of CHEMlCA.L:·TEST'1lBFUSAL l1BA.RING (pERSON UNDER AGE 211

(D~ !37A) ,':;,' ': !:>, ' 1,-, f
REFUSAL to SUBMIT to a CHEMICAL ,TEST (M 13k) ."
Instrument Calibration Shed
OperaJp'jtpef!1.rtCli~n.s~eJ :' ", "I
,Zero"Tol~rattCe: lii,Slructio,tShe.¢i
~.. .
NE\\' • YQRK • CITY,· POLICE • DEPARTMENt

108
i
I
"J
. P4~OL GUIDE ..:t.,:" • . ..
~.
"
'. 'S-ti'on0. .A.---. _'

oI"'lroIl~1.:J
',' , ...
,
'.
.; ,,,'.,1' •••.,:.
-~'1"-:~1"'.
.., ••. :':,. :'. ""'~
. " •...,
:,;' '.
.•
~
"'''0 <n3'..••;.
. : . :0" ithil"'KJ\O'-~,
J~~l~"fj~t-:'·.... ~o-y" -,
Ji.'
T ," .'
t '-"Y
~
~;
~.
OATErSSUED; ., . .: •.Pt~~V§:,.... R~SI.ON~U~~~_~:
0110112000 - "." ht .• ~oallOl1f63'O· ,.;' .....,
.' '" .... . .
;!> ..:.l·~1~:;;,;> ',~li?l:)\l:i!:.":· '", J"" ':~.',
PROCEDURE After arrest haS~b~en efftete;d·and prisoner- has been handcuff~:
NOTE ,WheT? a prisoner ·'has sun-'endered at a law enforcemtnl facility atuJ is accompanieiJ by
,a1) 4!f.om'ey;: th:e.:wtiformed ~member {}f the service .may request authorization from. the
,,' . iimmedia,e..super.vlsor MIlo use haTllieuffs. after ihe sujJervisor and the member have
evaluated:the·following crlterl4:.,·· ". ,
a. Potential threat to ihe officer. prisoner. and o/herpersons .
b. Possibili~ ofthe prisoner.!!S~ping ..
....
" . _. 'f' :"',: ~.'-\.:' >: - ~':.:':-~"',:-;~ ::.~. :
As SOQ~ 4S p':'JCticablet attempt ~Q. dJ,cem if tht:, person being an-ested has a disability
which 17UP.'. affect mt)~iJit,!;~~l~ear!n~t:9r;.~~!'t(ll abIlity. ~e possible, attempt
to noti./J' afm:nI11 ~eror:JHen4 ~~o. ~ prt?Y!4e b~ificial assistance regarding the
, prisoner's bft.~ ~T(017llfll!.C?~,.(Jr~ioJis ;l?~oo1~" pedigree data. etc.. The
(l!Te:stingtinvestlgatmg ~r:medmef!iber ofthe, service shall document all reasonable
(lttemPts~tf). notify a're1aiive orfrJend.
' .
. . .....~ •• :' .~ !~... l. .;, •• < ;i"
ARRESTING 1. Immediately fieklscareh1frisk'prisoner and search adjacent vicinity for

,- OFFICER . weapoif$;' (;vid~be andt~r Cbiltraband.
2. AdviS~ ;p.ti~nerbf righrs before questioning in accordance with P. G. 208-
o~, ."RIiJif:} 'OJ!'~t;o.~: T,a.~/nlo Custody, .. ".
a: ,..c. If a juv~ll~ :i!!,.'take~ -into custody, parents/guardians will be
"nbtififd immediately,
. ' ..•. ". ,,"
" .' .",\,...., ''':'', .1:.,'., .
.b. When ques~~P~gjuy~ne, Miranda warnings should be read to the
, Juvenile whiie tt\e p~ntlguardian is present The juvenile may be
~uest,ioned 'ii ~efs~e'·W.aives the Miranda rights in the presence of
the' parentlgU.a¢ian', . The parent/guardian does not have to
separately waive' th~{Mirandarights; they. only need to be advised
.'9f 'suth ri~.' '~~V{¢ver, if. the parent/guardian objects to the
questidning:()t'~eSts an attorney for the juvenile, no questioning
'. shouici QCCtir, cV'en if th~ juvenile is"wifling to answer questions, .
c.
• "
Juveniles -Mlli16tnotiriaIly be arrested for truancy. If arrested on
• ,', "". "'''.,'' 'o,;- '; - ." ••, . . •
'anoth~ eh!!1:~~~CY (~~~,~t~oq.~ L:aw'Section 3233) may be
add~ ~;a $~ndcFge: if.~P.P~2~~~~e. In all cases. truan:s may
.
be frisked.
or scanned
'.'
wlfu·lf'm.etal.
~. i c' '.. '. '.
detector. If safety dictates,
truat:tts may be handcuffed..· ..'
~. '. I' '. . • ' .
. _. • .. ':, '!" • i ' '.' . :':':'.. " , " .• "'l!1 1 '.' ~-. ". ':
NOTE When a prisoner aniJ/or paremsrgtwdia~'oftijuv.enile ao'not rmderstaruJ English, or are

/ze(zrlng impaired. the services d/an',bitetP;eiiff tfM:J.Y,be obralned by contacting the OperaJiol1S
UrJiL Approptiate Command Log'e!itries',Vill bihn~de whenSllch services are utilized
'. . o.
\ ~
.;,
j DESK OFFTCER 3'. Have vchicle or other cohvcyancc ~OT REQUrRED AS EVIDENCE
sat~gt:ard~d. if Clppropriatc,
4. Qllc~:ion the alTcstingofficer'rcgarding th(: t.::'~ ol'lorcc, ifapplic:.1ble.
NEW • YORK '. 'CITY • pdLieIi··· [)~'PARTMENT

109
...
~A:~(jJ.<;GuIDE:
P~~epYQ,., ., ..'" :.> ,.PA1i;~~~ PAOe:
':" .;'0,:., :~.. ~ ":.:~; . ;"" . .', >':,', . .< •••• • .' ...... ,' l
DESK OFFICER S. Observe physical· and mental condltlon of all pnsoners entenng conumind, .
(continued) and include results'inConUnand:Log: '
a. Ensure that prisoners' who appear to be il~ injured. or emotionally'
disturbed.obtain approp~e medical/psychiatric attention. (See P. ".
21O-(J4. "Prisoners Requiring Med1caUPsychiatrlc Treatment'")
NOTE If the arrest is effected by an offduty unifonned member ofthe service, the desk oJftci~
must notifylhe~commanding officer/duty captain who will respond to the stationhouse,.tQ:!
determine."the validity ofthe;arrest andJ,.ave· an (/nl,-Uual. Occurrence Report prepare4."
If the arrest is effected by a member of.anoth'er pollee ag~cy, that agency will be'i;
notified., ". . :,:
I
• • :1
6. Direct aa:esting ofli~to~ a thorough search ofthe prisoner in your presence. ~
-." 'a' Have" female "prioobers s~hedj in all· possible privacy, by
.\ . 'female poliC'C'stt6n3ant'b1: female polfte officer•
.'b.' "Once' a itnp·'s.earch i$ autD.oxtted, (see' P.G. 208-05, ··A.n-ests..,
. • -.< Oeneioi Seatcit~G¢!;1eli~·r sie'p one-tl).
:subdivision "en) th .
des~ offiCer:' p~iijCf Q,f9cCW:reoeetcentral. booking superviso "
will ensure thai th~ tblloWing erllrles are made in Department records: "',
(1). Co~ 1.P.g .'ent;ry" ~ including the basis for ..
":' s1,lth~rlZaiion o.r.the .stilp':~~ch; r~ name and comm :'
"o(the qfticrc' re9u~~~~,th,e,searchj name ~fthe prison~s
~~enti~ of,th.e Ul~~1?~ ,ofthe service performing the search
all.cJ, the .r~1,11t$ of the $'earch, including negative results. (
(2)" Th~"sUperVisoraUtlio.dzingsuch a search will ensure ilia
,tA~. s~~~~~tt .HStrip~'Searched," is written on the O.
LXNE'BOl>KING SYSTEM ARREST WORKSHEE
!~D24~~9,)'i\\ '.tl}e· "Narrative" section, and that t
comman.~ ~nd Co,inmand Log page number of the entry at
in.~h~~ed,fdr r~f.~~e"n~~. . . j
(3) Direct the ~~s~;rig 'officer to prepare an ACTIVITY LO'
(P~1~f-t1;~~ ~ri~ of the above infotmation. Also, inclu .
on.the "~risOn~r Movement Slip" if prepar~ the sta.temen
'<StriP. s.eat.Q~~ n. ~th the command and. Command Lo
'page. nui';dl~t. ,ot the entty in the "Detention Alert" section 0
, . " t h e foxm '$d~r .the sub-caption, "Other." ,
7. pir~t 'arresting pfficc;r' to' 4lquire. of prisoner whether a depende .
adult/child is unc~d TQrat pnsoner:s residence. . ,
a. Enter results ofinqulry Command Log. tn \
8, Have tl1e folloWiJ.lg ,p.rQP~Y, ~~moved from prison~r:
_a U~l,aw.f\il~Y,~~,~'d:.'.'::!', '
b. ~equ.ire(tas eyid~n.ce.!. " ,
c. Lawfully carried. but dangerous to life or would facilitate escape)
d. Can oe u~ed t~ defnce N damage pT0pCrty. ,'r·t:"
~. Pcrs\lnal, I;XI.:CPl dothing. i r prisont:r is intoxicated or ulli,;unsciolls.
f. Prc~:- Card issued hy Ih;:::' DepUllment.
NE\Y • YORK • CITY· POLICE ., DEPARTMENT

110
. PATROL GUIDE ,. ·,·.··.. , ..·, •. '1 <

'.
PAOE\'
. . . . 208.03
..
0110112000 30fl0
DESK OFFICER (1) "::"ForWard"'icatd~o: the Deputy Commissioner - Public

(continued) :·.. ·'·\·!iifOrmatioxq With report of facts.
g. , AwqIiaty ~oliee:'SlUeld, Civil Defense ShieldlIdentifieation Card.
(1
.
r: .:'(fffaefs.
,.~ :~or,Ward report to the Auxiliary Police Section with report
\,~\
~.. . ... 4gaJ~~'~~,.;sedP~C~Ption ~gs. (i,nelUding ~ethadone)•

. . •n) •., . ' . : .(~) ~ .tP.Yq.!~J,l?~~nptlC?n d1\1gs for safekeepmg and place in
.,;'.'. ::. '," '. pl.~.~'~~u:tiiy '~ve~ppe in p!isoner's presence. Give pink
, 'j' ',':-' .' :' ...,' •• ~p)'~.<?fPROP:ERTY CLERK'S INVOICE (pDSZl-141)
me
'\ '',\ ;'. ' "to; 'pJ:iso~er as tl receipt.
. "'. , (2) " .,·Pn,pareMEDICAL TREATMENT OF PRISONER
. ""(pD,244~150) to alert detention facility ,personnel that pris-
. bn~.iil8y:re<:}tifre a prescription drug.
. ,'·,.r-, •", \::),.~. . . : : "..", . .
NOTE to
llivoicethIriigs' ~11 be. deliVereii the bo~ugkProperty Clerk in the nonnal manner.
However. lftheprisoner is to b~ teJeitised (stationhcuse bail, desk appearance ,ticket, voided
arrest. etc.,) the aforemetJtioried drugs Will be returned to the prisoner at the stationlwuse.
i. Pistol Lice~e .'

(1) Forward license to the Conunanding Officer, License
. Diy}sion, with report offacts.
NOTE When the holder 0/ a pistoi liCEnse is arrested. the pistol license andjireanns(s) will be.
immediately seized and vou'chered if/heyare:
a. On the atTesiee S body
b. Within the arrestee ·s.area o/reach. or
c. II'J plain view r>flhe. arresting officer($) at the time 0/arrest.
l[ihe pistol /i~~IlS~'~~j;re~(s}~anMibe seized in the manner described above. the

arrestee shall be advised that he must surrender said lif;ense andjirearm(s} pursuant to
Lic~e Division ,regula.ff()aS.. and sh{dl, be given 1 ~n, .pppqrtuniry to surrender them
voluntan'/y. Ifthe. J(c~e. and/or}ll'earm(s} Cll(lnot b.e:., C!btqin.e~. by consent, and there is .
probable cause tp (J,e~ieve·ilta{ t)iey4re,in a parlicu.l~;lo..c;qt.!op.."q.search warrant will be
., obtained prior to seizure oJ ~. /icens.e. .~ iu;eafJftls}~ . ,~Ie,ss exigent circwnsrances
justify an immedf~e.~eIzure.,T/:eS!Jpervis0r ~im~·,~(/. ~ every effortlo obtain
thejirearm(s) and pistol license either by cl:.Jnserupr wi~ ,a se,arch warrant. The license.
once obtained. will be jorwardid with a repoi1; /0 the License Division unless it is
required as evidence. . ".. .. ~ ,
j. Rifle/shotgun permit
(l) Forward permit to the Liceq,se Division, Firearms Control
Section,
NEW • YORK • CrTY • POLICE • DEPARTMENT

111
. ~" .-
f'"
'I:-
~ 1tOC~ ~·~ 1~W~'2f)~3""
O~ ~',~'G~l;R:5·~ ~t:;,:,;~:, ·tl)~ ~t !."!"~01Jo~c;oo
,,' "
.:~:;.. I,:~::.':'.._~,'.~r,~:, ~ .,i~:R.EV~~lS~I~ON~NUMB~.~.~a:['==:PP~A.Q!~C,:,:~,~,I.,:;;' . ~ !: : '~=: ,.::..~:~ ~,;
4OflO'
~-"'-;;~'-"_.-db:::oa~~~~_--i!:""":"=,,_==-
~ -1\ . ' •. ,·· • . .,', .. ·c...
......._""""......!c:""""';""....c._.........=-=::o...,,.,,,;,IJ ,.(~
!
When the ,.".oIde!.~pf:a r:ifJ.ef;hotgwr permlt i,s arrested and cJwrged with.'J. fe1ony,l
NOTE ,
.(continued) immediate.lysetze '!J14.V9UcJtIP:,th.e; rifl~~Jwtgun permit andfirearm($) ifthey are:
a.. On tj1Jiizn:~lie's,iiRf!i· ." ,.
' 1,~
area
b.
c.
W"zthin the arre.siee's ofrellc!t, or ,
in'plain 'vi~w oftJJ'lIrresti~g~lJ}cer~$) at the lime ofarrest. 'l
~
If ~he rij1elsJuitg,m'perittit aridflfeii.fm($) 'etinnot be $eized in the mQMer described j

above. the iiri!e.ifee~1UiJi ~;?'aWiS'eil'i1i4J he must surreiuJer said permit and/ireann(sj,
piJnuant:tp[;ketis'e-DiviSion ~eW'dtitliis. and shall be ~ven an opportunity to surrender ~,
them, votumanlj.' il ilia' perlitfi tindlor jirearin($) clJhnb.t be obtained by cansenl, and .
there is prt>bfJb1e C4U$e'lo, DWiliVk:tltat they' are ,in a particular location. a search ,
" warrf.V1llViJ/,·bc obt¢nel./)priii.r to seiJ:ure 01 the permit and flreann($). unlm e::dgent :'
cir~r~nqeshSti.!J'an.JJ1UItqb(zJ~,$eizure. The SUf,ervisor: assigned will mtJke ever)! ',:
eJJPrt'19 aptai/1- thef!.r.e4T/t}{~J..!!1Jl!,iPJ!.F!/$ljotgun permit either by consent or with a search ;
warrant. The pvmlt. ,onceol1iained, wilJ be forwarded with a repQrt to the License /
DMsion. f'lrearms
. Co~J
.... ~QP"~~{~ . it is, rel[Uired ~
. eviqence.
-
. , '
.' ,. '. ~ . ,':I.~1!/':~\~~)· ",:. . .~ t
DESK OFFICER 9. Give it¢plized,receipt for property temporarily removed from the prisoner' "
(continued) wh1cbis not to be held in police custody.,. '"
10. Ask prisoner(s) if th~,;want, spy personal property they possess to be .:~
vouch~te4 fpr safekeeping.";· : , ' "\
a. A Command Log.,entry MUST be made indicating either the' ':
prisoner refused OR the PROPERTY CLE~'S INVOICE '
, num.1>er f<;lf prqpertY'$.afeguarded." .'
¥ • • ~ 0; -;" • ..~ ...-'J'i' • ~
NOTE This requirement does not appiy to property remov2d under steps'S and 9.
. \. ~ -." ,.
ARRESTING 11. Requestthe assistance of the !letective squad if the prisoner is arrested for
OFFICER homicide, serious aSsault. robbery, burglary, grand larceny, or other
serious, or unusual crime. ' ," "'. " /
,'., , ".,
~ j ~ ••
NOTE In all cases in':Wliiah ayoui!' B o/:esieJ,','and charged with a violent felony,
the precincl
detective' squadfI&fM' Will be It will also be the" '~
4irec'f$c' 'it)', enh.a.nce the ar:reSl.
. respoiiSilii1iiyoft£prec;;:~i'diieCJiy'i!li/PiW~ to iiJentf/Y.,'/oCllle lUIli apprehend any::
accomplices' ih tu#.f~'&J~~:~1frtfcp !1lyouth .vio{en~e and attempt to match them to ~
other outstanding crimes.' These Un~ti, 'Wil! ,a.J~o, attempt to identljjJ l11Id apprehend those
sellinggunsit:i/nlnqn. .\ :, -:: , "., ., . ' ,
.. '. .' ':'
12. Prepare,arrest related docum~ts as pro"ided by 'the 8rrest processing officer.

NOTE Comply with ~y appJicableir~vis{b~ oj/>.G. 208~15.".A.r.rest Report Preparation Al
Slalionhouse...• ',;, ' '" ": ',
13. Provide complainant with prisoner's name, charges, arresting officer's

name. precinct of OCCU1Tence, 'PROPERTY CLERK'S INVOICE
mimhcr, ifnny. and th~ l~)cati()11 nfth~ appJ'()priat~ ~(I~:~,
NE\.V • YORK • CITY·, POLICE • DEPARTMEXr

112
PATROL GUIDE "
Sof10
NOTE
. :, ••.• ~' ...~.~ ', _

..
.:~~ ~~,';",',. ," w~·
.
. •
ARRESTING 14.
,
....~<:fy~,,~P.ri~IJ~··of~e nght to ,make three (3) telephone calls within the
OFFICER .:.~~~ ,~~tI:<But c~argeor to' ~e collect calls, outside the City, if toll
'
(continued) I,'~1i!fges are ~~ted. ",

.'s:;''' " 'Make teleplion'e 'calls if the prisoner is incapacitated .by alcohol
" " .and/Qr ~gS..'. "
,15. Permit the piisOiier' to' Converse on the telephone, except where the ends
ofjustice ~r ~e ~f~.oJ;:,a d~gero~, 9Qncll,tion may be created. '. .
016. N()tlfy relatives or'.fti~Qs)f.the pri$'oner i~ \lIlder.riineteen (19) years of
or
age, isadIDi~to'a'hospi~ or is.appar~ritlyem.otionally disturoe(L
• ' . .' ; .~. , T • ., • •
qthe prisoner appearS to haVe adis~u;~, which ma)'~ff~ mobility, speech. hearing or
rnI!IJl!d ability, a reas<tnfll?l~.:D!terrrP.',shal! ~ ~,to noaffi a relative or afiiend. All such
attempts will be docur1teiUed by the arresting or inveStigating unifonned member oftheservIce.
',.' , '"
11.' Prepare a:~s~~'';'~ENTIFIED PERSON REPORT (pD336-151)

andn~#.fY .~e Pi'6?i1f~:!~ettctive squad and the Missing Persons Sq~d, IF
UNAaLE to MAKE 1HE'ABOVE NOTIFICATION.
a. ," If tbe iiot~fi~()~·is·made. preparation of the MISSING -
. UNIJ)ENTIF.IEP PERSON REPORT, notify the detective
. . squad aD.~ the Missing Persons Squad.
18. Comply with' P.G. 21.5-01, "Care' 0/ Dependent Child", if it is
detemiined that dependen~ adult/child is alone in'pnsoner's residence.
19.. Deltver.the fQ1i9wirtg cqrnpleted f.o~ to. t4e desk officer:
a. ' ()N~oot;>~9~~W(jRKSHEET(PD1M-159).
•I ~ . '" " , ....,:., .~.r ., . : ~
Ensw-e, that a,ny .gt(JifiiJ.. iag(ind!~r. gQizG:!.:r~lizil;i':1Jickname is entered in rhe

''A.IU..lNicJaumie;· ~tian'on line 12. i./.tJjJpl!fi,blefor'b.nyarresl. .
.' . :.~ .. ,~ .~. :'.~ :-- .... " ,. .' .~ ;:"., ~,l.f , " ':
. b. CoMPLAINr~Rt'W9RKS~ (pD313-152a). ifappropriare.
(1) Ift;he aiT~tisJ~t~'c4me,pr~~iously reported and recorded
on' a COMPLMNTtREPORT, use the serial number
. , 'aSsi~ed to':ili~ ?pgi;~i.1 COMPLAINT REPORT.
.' , •' ,I (":
Follow P.G. 208-1 i. f'AlTesr PfoceiS;'ii~L{':;iscan Fingerprinting, " immediately upon

desk officer's review aniJ;approvaId/COMPUlNT.REPORT WORKSHEET.
.. ~.~ . .
c. PROPERTY CLERK'S INVOICE WORKSHEET (PD521~141A)

for evidence or other pr(1pcny l',lkcn int., ;'l)licc ctlstod~'.
(I) A sepamre WORKSHEET will ~ pn;parl,;'d !(lr fire<mHS. mu'CI.'U'::\'
(.)r other property r\.'quiiing .u'l..l.ly'S~, ~\t the Police Labomltl ::-·.
,
NEW • YORK • ·CITY • ·POLlCE·· O:E:P,ARTMENT
113
PA~OLGUIDE . '
•
•
11'"
.';
... '
.. '.. '~" : • I '
" _. . . . . . . ., ' - •
PROCEDURE NUMBER:, DATE ..... ~ . ~: .~}.,., ....~I9li~-

20S.()3 olIo.112qj).O I' 6oflO . . .. ,
ARRESTING d. ·PROPERTY CLERKS' MOTOR VEWCLFJBOAT INVOlCi

OFFICER. WORKSilEEt tpD57:t':'i47a), ifR:qtnred: .\ < .,
(continued) e. .~'IJf$r. i?911:~~T~RY~AnON (pDS21-161), .
if~q~' .' . :.... :. h ~".' .'. . , '. •.
f: DF$K~J?~~TI~.IN'VESI1GATION(pD360-081);:.
. 'if aPPropriate.· .... . . .
g. JUVENILE .~T INVESTIGATIONIPROBAUO.··
ooAlOt I{EJ.>ORT ~Olq(sHE~(pD217-15ta), lfappl'Op~
(1)' qne (1) COpY.~rTYPED .~PRT will.b:e forw~ed wi~
the arre:;t d9CUt:l1enfs and distribute the remaining copies to·.
the preCin~' Y9~tii ,o,fficer, Youth Divisio~ and juveniie
detentjol?- racUitY, ifjuvenUe is detained.
~ ;"{. ' . . . . " ..' .. ': t
NOTE Se~" P.G. . 20s.;2J, "4rreS~~;ivist~ C~' 1!1td NITRO Deh~i!Jin&" if a DESi,'
·APPB4l/.JtNCE "neItltT, is i#ue4 at iJie pr'idncl 01 arrest.· In addi/loll, have the,i
Co~ lrWeJ#gdlion ·'card FiliJ" ''queried by. complying with P,G. 208:/
23. "CCmpUteriz.ed Investigation Cart! System" in an arrest cases.
" '.< • " - '~.:.'~ ':'. ; . '0j; _~' .;. ~ : •
h." ~DI~AL·''(RE,A.t~NTOF. pRISONER, if prepared.

t 1) ~ . Prepare :the'.form if the pt'isoner receives m.edi';,
~psychiatrie; Jr~~nt or refuses treatment .afte .
. cl~g ~ i"njp'ty 'Or' ill~essJ already 'has previously treat~
prid;:~.1nj~€SJ·· is:~ ~ apparent need of treatment or rna
reqtiir~.pt~~ri~e4.·~~ication. '.,
<2) If ~e, pQs~n~r~,\s., ISSUed a DESK APPEARANCE-,!'
T~C~t', . 'q:l~'ihe"Bu:ff' copy of the MEDICAL
tREATME~ forni-'ina folder maintained at the desk 0
the p'recinct of aife~t forward the remaining copies 0 and
~he fom tq Cen~ral ~pokirig facility. ; . , . ;:;
20. .I:?~l.iver ~T )~JCY~~~TI6N }::HECla..IST (pD249-o10r
and photOCopies of the following Department forms to the desk officer .:
e~~ry~ in ~Qichthey aie·J?l"~~ed:. . .: . .
a. ON LINE BOOKINQ.SYSTEM ARREST WORKSHEET
. b. ' . C6MPLAlN'f REPORT W6iri<SHEET .
c. .~D;EP AArqip:.)l'o~·HEEt(PD304.-152·b)J both sides
d. ACTIVITY LOG. entries .
e. . .', Pn.Q~~R;tX:CLE~'~INVOICES (District Attorney Copy)
f. . . REQUEST FOR LABORATORY
•' ':" If.. ••
EXAMINATION
~. ..'
. : • ~
g. SUPPORTINGDEfOSITION
h. STOP AND,.fR1SK.~PQRT(pD344-151)
1. p.C.C.B. BUY REJ?ORT.€pD321-152) .
J. SPRINT Incident Inquiry (from SPRIN1)
k, Order 0 r Protc'c(ion . .
t Phot(\graph5 of evidencc mot('lr vchiclc!' rctLlmcu to o\\'n~r (!'c<t:
f>. Go' : 18- 1S. 'PlwlOgraplu"lIg S/O/CII l:,'vidcllcc Fchicles 1J'llell AIl 1
Ilrr('...; Is /I.'fadc·',: .
:'\E\V • YORK • CITY • POLICE • DEPARTMENT

114
NOTE
: ~ :,UNDE.fG.-NG-qRCuMs:rANCES,.WJLlr.;4RREST PROCESSING BE (fNNECESSA.RILY

:' . lJ.Q14f$JJ. TOlil!JT4lJ:l,THE,1JJ)Cl!.ME:NTS REQUIRED UNDER STEP 21. .
.~·r, :·:I·~ •. , '.... >#\1.;.: = "'.:'. ,'1,1 0;,-
DESK OFFICER 21. Examine all' f9qns to eIis~e completeness and ac~uracy and. sign all
. (orms as:req~~~,.,; ~'!' .• '."' . .
a. .Review :~~1;·,:;.J:>Q.GUl\mNTAnON CHECKLIST to ensure
all ,(o~ PI'ql~c;:dW:~I1I!r-.ct.!,?n with the ~ are available.
. (1) ... Re~ ~1ij£.(;.~lST to arres~ing officer for delivery to
. " , .,.' th~ ~i&~t .4ismct atto.:fJ:l.~ ~n the Complaint Room or
. ,', 'i'::;:\~;~"';;, ..... :::?rQ~ljverAn ~p¢aqce wi~ borough procedures.
22. ,ASaeitain'tA~tthe fo.no~~gl~ntries,are made:
. " a. Sta'~II\~p'"tlM!,t ~:p~sqJ1~~,. :charged with criminal possession, of a
controlled substance with intent to sell or Wllawful sale of a
• ,. • ~ .... Of :... ..... '
· ~on~U«l su~~~c~, ~ ~. seHer:;and. ind~cate reasons for that

'~on~lU$iQQ'~,.~~ ..ijarrat.iy,y :pl~~·. of th~ ON LINE. BOO;£aNG
·SY$.nM~rWO~HEET.
, b. Names, a4qress~$ and telephone llumbers of witnesses are entered
on : 'fu~~ ·,COMPLAINT RE~O~T or the COMPLAINT
FOLLOW-pP (P:P3.\~-08~), if prepared.
c. Statemenl:.,Qn fRQ.P·EE,TY,CLER;K'S INVOICE that property
(other·~ .Y~~iCI~),·is Yiilu~ble, cO,ntains iden~ifying marks, and
·.that:. Ut~ .stQJe~ Prpp¢rty In.,quiry S~ction (S~'P .I.S.) was notified.
including the nmne.:and ~title of the person at S.PJ.S. notified.
:d. Infcmn~on qon~~~g~l?ffil.S ~smitted or cancelled, with
op~or's;\:I!~~; .: e~~re4 .on ~O~PLAINT REPORT,
PROP~RTY:~~~~?S:;INVQ.ICE.anc~ 'lJROPERTY ,INDEX
'" " (PDS42~],04)1 3$.:·t~uire4.;.:· Sta[~ and police agency must be
;:. inch~~ i(~~' is-~mitted'by,other than a New York State
. 'agency;..:~f~o .al~ ,~srl)itted. so':state.
e. A A1ar4 CPPY of Jhe; f,~r $~~n co~~ining the notification to
· S.P.~S. i~,attach~·to~~JC~~~~A:INT REPORT, COMPLAINT
FO~LdW":VP'~i,: :,~~p:~~~ty CLER1('S INVOICE or '.
PROPERTY CLERK'S MOTOR VEHICLEJBOAT INVOICE,
whichever mos.t ~C(~u~tdy reQec.(s the current status or a motor vehi-
cleJb9~t!plate being r~port~d stqlen, recovered, etc.
r. Ent~r dcmil~of. n~>linc(lllon
.."..,.
ill Command 1.o!.! (name. addre$~.
rdntiollship) w\l~n priso!l~r is ~)f un:::'~llmcJ mind. llnd~r ninct~cl:
-
or
( 19) y~"rs nge or i~ .idmirtcd [0 ;: I~.):,pilill.
NEW • "'ORK .• C.ITY • I)OLICE • OE.PARTMENT
115
",': .
'. ,
.. .:: . : ......
~4:'rRQp.GvmE , 'c.
. . p~os: •...
. 8~(lQ
DESK OFFIC~R ; g. £Pter, in- :COriiInand'Log' 'infoi:mation 'concerning releaSe' c>$

(continued) p~4~'jq 'Jii!t4~:~$>(~~\vay~~tp:~~,tO~~onduct required tests.
h. Eri~ha~~"~i'r~fS on ()~ t~' ~OOKING SYSTEM::
" . ~'~O~~~~.~der·c~'tion: :'N~ve.~'
1. En~.~y,:¢h~ke ~ fJ1~.custOdY.9fthe Pnsoner In the Comman9:
Log a.ndnotifyb,oIigu~.,Court SectionJor cOmputer entxy·of new\
prisoner location~:l' I: '.f- ~;.,': .'.," . I
oj. . Document any other pertinent facts in the Command Log~)

iticludih~ serial·numbers of any..fonn.s:'prepared regarding anest.:, i
k. Ndtif'y'court ·s~tio~ SUjjervisor for'doinputer entry when prison~i
is admitted to a hospital (see P.G. 210-02. UHospftalfre4i
, ' " . . . f ...;". .. . • . 'J.' I
'. Prisoner'$·-'j.'· .'..' ,L ' - . . ' ~:'
(1) Record notitieatioIl'in Telephone Record. ':~

.1.' '.',' Ita thil'c:r~efSphdb.'ti'can·is'·made by the prisoner, enter telephon~2
""tiumoer-aml :iCieb.tity ofpCis~h called in the Cominand Log_ Make'/:
,. .. ,.~ ~'Ob~Miid Log:~ ift1ie prisoner iefuses telephone privileges~~
23.. j Refer'·lep0A1~fCast:S·'(Offenses not triable' in New York City courts oiJ.
violation ofparole~'ofp'tQbaition) to detective squad. 'fj
24. Direct that~~a.'Y6"~ MeSs~e" is transmitted, if required. :~
Male,e Ii,C••ti~,c~tiO~,>':~~,"•req1;.:.U~<*1, b,Y P.C!. 208,-69. "Notifications In certain'I:,.J"~
25.
Arrest Sltuatl{jns.. ,,~,..,· ..... " .., . "<:'
26. Request bor(:nigh::~Court· Section concerned to provide transportatio~
O~Y ~he!ll~g~':~~beis~ of:p~neIS must be transported or unusti~~
circumstances dicOOe-'the'use of ti pa'trolwagon. ';~
27. Return·the following forms to' ',the arresting officer for delivery to th$l
assistant distnct"atmrney in the Complaint Room or deliver in accordanci~
~ith bO~~~f~~~d'~~STEM ~RREST WORKSHEET
b. Fingerp$t f~tmsHf.,prepared
',;1I
c. C~py of DAT/INVESTIGATION, in everY misdemeanor an~
violation: ease '. ':-~l , r ,.; • }~
d. Gree,,'n, (5th),' ,c~.py. "Of",the., P~OPERTY, CLERK'S INVOIC'~.:,.,
and/or ,PR9~~~n.,'CLERK'S MOTOR VEmCLEJBOAl
INVOI~;if Cfi<Jehbe'lias'been v o u c h e r e d : ,
e. SUp.r(i)Rrlf'l(}:b~POSmON, ifprepared '}
~g. . MEDI¢.Mi~t\~l'ff OF PRISONER fo~ if prepared ,r
h. ' ,JuVEN:1LE'~T'- INvEsTIGATION ~PORT. ifprepared.,'I;
28. Make riec~·~tties'in Comniand Log, InterrUllted' Patrol Log an:~'
, ROtC: ~CAI;t;"wk~:required,' Indicating arresting officer's time d>
departiie tet·horbugh''CQtirt Section: ~r
, . . .. ' '.' '. . , .,~. ,
, • ~'j
ARRESTING 29. Deliver prisoner 'to boro~gh Court Section or lodging location deSignatedi~·.
OFFICER! by boroUgh Court Section concerned. ' i~
ESCORTING n. Inroril~'hor\)Ugh COlin' S~ction :;ll"cryi~or if pri:mncr(s) was strip':~~
OFFICER sC<ln;h~d. induding reusoll tor ;,mu rcsuhs of [he search. . ~~
. ' . . 'y{\
NE\V • YORK'· CITY • POLICE • DEPARTMENT i~
....'"~:1
116
. ,;.,
PATROL", GUIDE
.....
'" ~-,' '~'.,-
ft'" "ON, ~ _:;~."'" .; ,:,~'. :., .' -: •• ''l ':
.',' ..
90flO
30. Present all fo~~it.~·tl),artesdd the boro~gh Court Section suPervisor.

31 ,Comply With an:~~e8t1ons
.:
of~e borough Court Section supervisor.
. ~ ' "
BOROUGH 32., ~.W~: ff,l (~rmJ..,tp,~~~:;~mpl~teJ}~~ and ~ce~y.

COURT, 33. FQ~~ \~il.~,mP!~~,$et,'or~ICAL ~TM:ENT OF PRISONER
SECfION. ' fo~lfp~~~th~~@gotfice:rtoDepartment (>fCorrections
SUPERVISOR see P:;G{::lJ{)4JJi·i~~aTtfl:3 RelM7jng,MedicallPsychiatric Treatment'!. .
3.'. ", /~~inglescorting officer will.obtain receipted pink copy of the
>·,fOIl\l ~Ai~t\l.Ql iuo tbetbQIOugh court Section facility.
34. ·EnsUI'cf~t,tltffoo1p.puter.~enemtedPrisoner Movement Slip has·a notation
:"'},'in'the'1?etentidh AlertS.ecti.Pip~hen·,,~ pris(j~~ is violent, resists arrest, is
. ·"em.ofi'oMlly ~ed;"~ens 'Of,: ~pts· sUi~ide. When a pcison~ bas
: i~. ~p.:~~1i¢, ~~.~ ~fiin~ "pther,u in the Detention Alert
SeCtion. 'fnclude ,~~ .. cq~d, ..~~9.. ,Cq~d Log page number for
r~fete~e. ~ A.no~!?n··~~g ~. ,~~. !?~ner has been strip-searched
.will also1?~ ,p134~ ,PI1 '~~'" ~!U:~O~. ,]1tANSPORT DISPATCH
<P!?171-132) for n9tifi.~on to' the deskofficer~ precinct ofdetention.
35. . Rewm the fol1owin~,mest related documents t~ conunand for filing in
Arrest Folder: . .•.;. "" .. '. ' . .
a , Arr~ting offic~~s copy of the C;ourt Complaint
b. ON LINE'HOOKING SY$T&M ARREST WORKSHEET
c. Arfesting'Qftlcer;s Copy of th~ 'P!tOPtRTY CLER.K:'SM()lCE
. . an~«?r lROPEl\-r{... c;~ERX{;S . MOTOR VEIDCLEIBOAT
. INVOICE. if prepared.,
ARRESTING 36. Bring all related papers to each subsequent court appearance,
OFFICER
PRECINCT 37. Follow up art arrests of youths under sixteen (16) years of age.
YOUTH . . .... ':~'.: . .. ; "" ',\ '., ',:" .: .
OFFICER
ADDITIONAL To slrenglhen th~ pr~Sepllio~ of auto lari~~'f.:: e;tlSei. 'aliunifi,rmed members of the
liATA service will perform a license check. through F'iNW. using the tlD.ttLL. ' Format. on
all defendants arrestedlor the following: .
Q. Driving a stolen vehicle. Q& '. ,,
b. Driving an Quto with.an altered Vehicle'ldenrificarion Number (V.I.N.). OR,
c. Possession ofstolen plates:
Arresting/assigned officers will notify the Assistant District Auorney drawing up rhe
court complaint of all verbal and writ/en statementS made by the defendQJU and any
procedures used by the police to assist ti wirness/complainant /0 identify the defendant.
In additjon. the arresting/assigned officer will make an appropriate emr), of the
nOlijicllfioli il; his/he" ACTIVITY LOG. '
OBSER' T:'RS .'( r 1'111:" SCENE QF POUCE [jYC!DESTS

A.\' Cl rllk \·,·i!":11 (/ III/tiCl' (~(lic~1' S(0I'S, dr::teJills 01" .;n', ';," (/ (),,:I:WI/ ill {l pl..:'/iC (I r,,:,,: ,
pc:r,~()//s II :~" );:IPIWt/ III he hi 01' (/1'(' (lIfot'lU:<! /u (It~, ,we /wI/Wtt/ly
;;,"L'C: ill po..-t:;.)11 10 (/Ii,:
NEW'· YORK • CITY • POLICE • OEP:\RTJVIENT

117
.....
PATRQL GUIDE. " .
,,~
~/::~ ~
'
.~.",
"
-, ......... ~ , 'J-.
j PAGE: ' .•.'

<'
j
r\ ADDlTION.dL are aI/owed to observe lhe police ojJicer's aciialU. This righno observe Is. of C,?U~
• DATA', '< limited by rl!.fJ3pns,of Safety to41J. C()ncerned QJZ!l (JS kmg as there is no substani.
(conttnaed) v]olatlo;£ ofkiW: T'he/ollowing guJdldines should be utitued by police officers when,Ed
.. ~~e a~v;,.~;:~;1ts,;~g 'in ilteVlcinity ofa Stop dr ~esl Shal/' not be $Ubj~~
, " ' ~t JOr, 'OMtfUctlng GoVeriimental Aclminf:stration (PeM1, Law, ~
19$:05): iJJtlJ!j'i,'t/nNijfiw litJS probable cause to believe the ~rson or petS~
<' are (JOs!rUc/i,tg.gbvenimentaladmlnistratIon. <". ;:t • , ,
b. None 01 the<ljOIIbwing'IC011$dtuJes.probable cause for arrest ordetenliOJl oM

onlooker Ult1esS:the sqfety 0/o~ or otherpmons is direcdy er,zdangered ~J;'~
. o.lfit:,er lWl$Q'fYll1lyJ.>~f"'~ they aY..i# f!l¢t;nFed or 1M law Is othenrise wola!~~
, " (l}<sp'~ 'fl:t?1J'!.~ though ~ and vulgru. .;~
(2) ". . <~rI!f~tb:tKfl11!!mrJ.king Mles <o!shft'# numbers. or·1Ul1M$ ofofftcus ,:~
(3) . ," riiJdiNp~to.~!,t' •. vldeota~..or tape recordings "~
, (4)" R~ii"!'1~ilP~~(iJ.',ort(te'$iOp<?r,an-est:
WfteneveT: ~, ,"'oFf/oRftf, ~ '<~~i~" ~r ~ into Q.LStody, the a;resliflg oJt~
< ''{
Co
$Juzfr·requ~(.tJie·prtltro[ Supervisor ,to 1he scene. or ifU1f(J.V(lflilble, repoif:fA
aqtidn't(j tie'ifipei'ViSorwliere tneperson is taken. . :,,~~tl
< ;". ~ ,:" ", • -;' "," (. ': ". " " , ' . . ~
This proce;4ure is ·l1ot inte.w.hr4 iJ.l.'.atO' :manner 10 #mit the authority of the pollcei~
esto1Jlish police lines. e.g•• crowdc<Jn.trol at scenes offires. demonstrations. etc. .~ ;
RBLI1TE.D ." . 4rTeStRepon preparation ~~ 9iar~oithotis~ (P.G. 208-15)

,.
,P1,l.PCED:URES Arrest· Gei'teriJ.{ search 'GuidelineS (p: G. lOB-OS) . . ~-
", , 4rrests -"ie~ M~urei{P.(;. 20B-06) >

bests;' "FiriitSc"'<cMC!d'A,,fd ·'Nitro "Dehn"efing (P.G. 208-21)
Pri$oner Requiring MedIciJlIPsycliiatric Treaiment (p"G. 210·04)
" ;
. FORMS AND ACT1VlTYLOG (PD112-145)
-\ , REPORTS A..RRBSTREPORTSUPPLEMENT WORKSHEET(PD244-IS16)
MEDICAL TREATMENT OF PiusONER (PD244-J 50)
ON LINE B(Jf)I#1V.GSYS7::E},j A.RREST. WORKSHEET (PD244-159)
,I PROPERTY CLERK'S INVOICE (pD521-141)
< t
i
p
NE\V • YORl<; • Cl1~Y·· POLICE • pEPA,RTMENT

118
.: ! •
,
"
. .
REVISION NUMBER: PAGE: .. "

-
lof2
PURPOSE To advise p'e:&oruf'~eh~mto:,cUstodyoftheir constitutional rights.
PROCEDURE PP9~~.:9-':~~~~~~~~';~~~~en in~o~ custody:

UNIFORMED L:~ . ;:':!itform ·:·such person of the following constituti9nal rights (Miranda
MEMBER..Qf ..'.. : ,~ .:., . /~~}~gs)~ ; >'.;:~'<;' .:.. ... ' ' -:
TImSER\1'CE;:::~·:'.:I.;1'~l: l/i!.)!Y:<)~{;have.thengh(to teIIiaiIi silent and refuse to answer any
. . .. , questions. Do youundemand? . ,
. ,.... ,. J~. . .... .A:nything YO\1 say maybe used against you in a courtoflaw. Do
..:, .'. ".,;; . <you ili:td~d? ,." ~;:' .: . .'
'" .,.,: c.You nave the ~righHd~eoIisulf·anattor:ney befo", speaking to "the
police and tot. have' anattbmeypresent during any questioning
now or in the:'AIW,re~' Do you unde~tan4? "
d. .If You ;c3Imot aftbrd 'an' 'attdbiey,0ne will be provided for you
witbQ].JtCfist Do.you .understand? , ' . ,
. e. Ifyo~ ao,.'hOt'have'an attorney ·avanable,:.you have the right to
remain' silent until you have an opportunity to consult one. Do
you linde.d?' ,
f. 'Now iliat~I have advised you of your rights, are you willing to
'J answetql1eStions? " ', . .," ,,' •.
2. Explain any Portion;ofthe rigl1.tsthat the peIs6n in custody does not understand.
a. Ifperson in custody dpes not understand..J;nglish, or requires the
, assistait~"~f a sign' language interpteter~ i-equest an 'interpreter
from the Operations Unit. '.
3. Cease iI:lterro~on if subject wants an ~orney or wishes to remain silent
4. Contact 'attorney for person'in cuStody."
NOTE When questioni~i juveniles, both lire juvenile 'a;W pa,.~nJlguardian must be given the
Miranda Warnings. ThejUileni{e may be questionp,d, if!tclshe waives tht:Se rights in the
presence of zh,e parenrl~ The. parent/guat(Jjq~ does .I)0t have to. wai:V8 Jhe
t l. ' '. ..• ~ ~ J,;. J
rights. ''they Mea onlY' be ad'4$ed. ofsUch ,rigJus. U; however. the parem or guardian
Q1Jjeds to the: qui!srtonlng,'or rerjuesrs· an atto~ j§.r, the juvenile. no questioning
should occur even ifthejuvenile is willing to,~·qtestions.·
DESK OFFICER! S. lnfo.rm prisoner of presence of attorney aIJ.d asIc·if he wants to see the
SUPERVIsOR attoqley.
CONCER..1'olED·
NOTE If an attorney stales that ~e refresents a pri.$.Q~er but d,oes not know the identity ofthe
prisoner. he will noi be permitted to inlervie\v him. . '
6. Pennit' in~~~iewi~be'eOnductedi~rilUsterroom for a reasonable time.
7. Assign unifomled member: of the service to keep prisoner and attorney
under continuous obse~ation at all tsmes. Ensure that no objects are
passed between the prisQne~and the attorneY:
119
: :~ '. ,' .. .,
PATROL··GUIDE·~;'" i., .. :.. ~ ....
.PROCEDURE ~BER:
208-09
DEsK OFFICER! 8, ·Enter··.. iuid~;·-~~DetMj~:: ': ~f' !hi ON ~lNE: ':BOO~G' S;~~~ ::.
SUPERVIsOR 'ARRESTWORKSilEiif(pD244-~59l:;':" '.' ...,.' . '.:: .. <~
CONCE1UiEb a. t Name, address and phone number of attorney and identity of' ,J
, (continued) person who r~Wnedhhn. ".' ":'.'::.' .'. ,. : ", .' "'('. :~:
b. ffinterVi.ew was conduQ~ . . , .' .; .
c. .Tiiile.'of attomey'~ ~vaiinldeparture:
DESK OFFICER! 9.
SUPERVIsoR' 10.
CONCERrfEI? 11.
.' .
MEMBER OF 12, Record contents of messag~'in. Telephone Record including:
THE
. . SERVICE
.. a. Time,'llame,. acli!i~ss'~;:and phone number of attorney, name of.
CONCERNED . person ari~t¢d1:and' any
other facts which may assist in locating .;.
• "I :
pn'sone:"" . t~.::.·.. ',' :
'r'
•• 'i~:t . •• • "".
. • 'j! ",. " '. . , : •
NOTE ~1:'; 'I/Tf.}~~ho,~~ Rec~rd i~ not n:zai~~~~~4~;I1,c~~nd. entry will be made as directed by:;
., commanding officer.. . ' , ' " ,:; ,
~'. ;",~
. 1:i.
I; ., •
Request" ¢prnm~isaJions Se¥ijon to t:ranS~it FINEST message to all':

commands advismg that the particular defendant is represented by co~el, "
\ .: '\. ..
", ": ' .' ~ . ~
DESK OFFICER! 14. Determine .If.pri~one~,.is_4~~~~ ~ :st;ltionhouse/.Department facility. .

SUPERVISOR i 5. DireCt int~ao~g ~fij~er:s ·C9n~~.~9 ceas~in~errogation and permit :,
CONC:ERNE.D prisoq~ to C9~~t. attomey,if,:prisoner.: -is"loeated m precinct!,
Departm~nt faqility. . . , . ,., '. ' ;
.'
. ' :.. , '~.:'.' ,t '.
NOTE A uniformed m-embe; ofthe service who has injormriJion concerning the wh~epbouts 0/.,4 r
the prisoner will communicate with the desk officer (or counterpart) ofhis,Comma~:; ..
The desk office; will notify the originator ofthe FINEST message. '
• . ,
,
>'
,
"
. ·1
Guidelines' lisi~ in steps / ~ .l~rqlfgh. i~ apply 9niy ill. t~ose situations where an .:
allomey initialed an irUjitiry seekIn.g to locate a client who was arrested and with ",:
whom he ha.v had no prior c.ontact in this'arrest situation. .
FORMS AND ON !.!NE BOOKT:VG S,YSTEM..f RREST WORKSHEET (PD1JJ.159)

NEPORTS A Rl([;"ST IlI~PORT S( ·PI'1.l:."M/;'.VT (PD244.1.'i7)
~:E\V • YORK. • CITY • POLICE ., DEPARTMENT

120
. ,
PATROL GUIDE
;«:. Sec~ ~"':;'~A»":;,,::)/ '" '," "'::<".::"'~~.N9; :20~U. ,,'
'.' ,L ,". ..,-- ',:tv!' ;1IN<9f!?~'f;·,;/\,.'o.'" <t' ';!;,,'- , .•, - ,' .. ,."1". H'!"'··,·i\·':j:;.o4tl .... :· -:,"~" ,,' ,....' _ •
,.. ~'J; :r!~~~~-,~C~J~·gf~~!fltITING

DATE ISSUED: . • .~~~~:Vli;' REVISION NUMBER: PAGE:
011011200> •. "'" OfldlJ200t> .1 ~q
PURPOSE To set fodhgnidet.~rJtiunjfjli2ationofthe'i.lVESCAN' computer~~

. .:, {. ~ -; .;.:~~.~.~:~; . I'~~".~~!{;/.:;~:i\! :-(:' \, . ~. . ,~' . ", .;.{.... ;.:.. ~ ! I, '.
PROCEDURE In al;~~j~0i:lstwhfmevCr.aprisoner is required to be fingerpriiitea,?except

bedside atra.igBDi~'tJof;alliospita1ized prisoner, or a hospitalized prisoner wh9
"may be:-JcIigtblt',:mr a·'Desk Ap!Searance Ticket, utilize the ''L1VESCAN'~
,computerized ~gerp,rii1ting systeItl'and:
NOTE :·;To .tnaintiJin·.Q 'fugh.. f/Ulliity qfftngerprintS. operation of the "LlVESCAN" machine
. , ~'.', sl1oW4~ 'b,~;perfiJ~d."T,y,.the commimd~'.designtlted arrest processmgoffjcer, if
~'
app1IcabTiJ;or a nte.JJWeroftne s~ appropritJle1y trained to operate the machine.
, , :
-:' , .-'~ "~jl.'" ' . , ~'~'. t- .j • • .~ •• \
ARREST ; ,_ ... 1., . G,enerate aI:reStnm;nbex: lhrough the On Line Booking SYstem (OLBS).
PROCESSING .8. ~.proper·~TPROOESSINGTYPE" code is entered d~g
OFFlCEIY ' OALiaeBooldngSysmm dataentty.
DESIGNATED· 2. Recofd the ,check digit that. appears on the On Line Booking System
MEMBER' terminal screen at the completion of the PF-3 data entries, onto the top
right comer o,f:the: ON LINE- BOOKING SYSTEM ARREST WORK
SHEET (PD~l.s9j.
a. Retrieve the arrest's'
check digit through the "BADS" computer
system if the cheek digit was recorded.· not
NOTE TIu check digit is neCessary for operation of the "L/VESCAN." computerized
fingerprinting system and subsequent trarismission offingerprints.
, ,
3. Immediately proceed to begin fingelprin1ing upon completion of On Line Booking
System data entries (PFlIPF3), utilizing <'LIVESCAtV' machine as follows:
a. , Ensure both the 'prisoner's hands and the' scanner platens of the
ULIVESCAN' machine are clean and' dry:
(1) Use "Com Huskers Lotion~' .to softe,n prisoner's fingertips,
, , 1",' ifex~iV'elyfuy~:.' 'iF? ",', "~. : . "., . .
·b. Enter' a.deit n:ti1iiber'Withch~t'(flgitinto ''LIVEScAN-' comput~.
~ .. " '. . ' • .'>',1 ~ '\:: ::-::~:;.~. 'jr~. ... ~:,:~::~.J.' . :.:. ~:~. ,'. . .'
Once arrest number (With qitec'Aj'!JIiiif:::i~::i!liiif~d.inio:lhe "LIVESCAN" computer. all
pertinent arrest injomtlitiotl iS~auioindtiiJa11fi:dOkioaded to the "LlVESCAN" computer
from original ' ,On Li~ 'Booldng! "System;'dtita entries. if this information is nor
transferred to "LIYESC:QJ.,~~'i(jjbrtT1!lJ,ipn :musr be re-Seht through "BADS" as follows:
• .S,elecl #1, ·'~~e.ilR.tl!/l.!m'oJrrs. "from "BADS" main menu.
• ~1Jt~r:aTTes~,ri~~~ M!h~:,pr:qmPfefl:. ;;.":':;',
• .¥o,!e ~or:."q\~ption., ~LIVf.:SqAJXMS§ND."and markfield with'an "x" and
entei:... (Message at l?o,tlQ.r!t ..of scr~en will read. "R.ECOR.D HAS BEES
t
;-!>
•
TRANSFEItR:£D FOR LWESQ,A./'I. 'J' ..
Return 10 "[IVESCAN" fIIllchine'and restol't proC{JS.~
121
. P'~~~:
.
A Tn<pT' GUl1>E'
.... '.Li
;,. '.\
, . " .' ,.; .'. . . . _~',-..'
.• ~ : ;~:.'". :..,~ ... "~"::~.'
I
.'
,
t~WMBwt: .:'::', .Q....m~r :.lYl!:, ~$!9.}.J,W~B~. " . . ,p,AGB: ' ',~!];:" .;, . ; .~:'~
. 20$...1 1., : :'~. ,,' o'.:Ji.9WQQo,. ;. , .:', , 'Jf" '>";':\1,' . ~ 2,pf3" '::\!'" ,p
• ,.,' •• / :'. ... - • ~ ., 4 •• ' • • :: "~"( • • : ":~:- ' j ! . ':.' ;~.
ARREST c. Fingerprint plain (fJ3t) imp,ressions of th!f, fum (4) ,fingers. ~us.;,
.PROCESSING thumb on larges~er platen and the thumbs on the 'small scanner plate
OFFICER! and press "SCAN." "
Dl£SIGNATED (I), , The four' (4hfing~ o£,,~eh hand must be placed on an' angle'o.
MEMBER scanner platen, with special attention to the pinky finger.
(continued) (2) ,Press ''SAYJ.'t" ,:~~?pl~, impression basI been"'eompleted afl
hand is reJ,1l0ved from scanner platen.
d. Fip.gefPrintin.divi4ual,finge~ on $niall, SQallller platen centering the ~
of each fmger ,pn' ,the, cross, Unes.d.ndicated on· the left screen of
"uVESCAN" machine. " " ",. '
(I) " "EQ$l,lre"pIQper seque!\cc as ~eate4 by left screen prompts. ",~:.,
(2) .,."RoU·"eachfinger,to o,ne ~ide as,'~cated\by qirection mrows
ccLI¥E~CJ\N!:'~bine,ind l>~ ciSCANr' , . .
i" (a) INDIVIi>UAL FINGERS MUST BE ROLLED. "
(3)' ,'Press "SAVE;";~,after' roli has' been completed. and fmger'
. 'remoyedfriitnscanneriplate14 ifimage is acceptab[~·
'(a)· :.:':' Press. dSdAN''' which erases fanner image, if '.
mlacceptablt.
, -
priOf''finger again.'
.•.. ~ .'.
.:
.
.
......,
and
NOTE ApPropritJle nQuztfons must be e.ntereti in ~'UYESCAN" computer when fingers
unable to be adequately prlntedftll'::any ritiion. (i.e.. tlMlSS," "AMP. "INJ," ..~ It
etc.). This information is to b.,~ entered in. designated fingerPrint box. UNDER:'
CI/f..CUMST4:'NCES [SA FINQ,ERPRlNTiJ.OXTO BE LEFTBUNK.
• ...,. I. • ,,_'''' • .~ , - •
4. C~eck ~mit'qu~ue 9f"L,IVESCAN",computer to ascertain ifprintS:-".

,being transmitted, when completed; ,. ...
a The "ACTIVITY LOG" function displays a list of reco';
."
,
~: :
. tran$mitte~..for the prev:i9~s seventy-two (72) hours. .':
NOTE CQ-mpJete "LIVESC).N·~'processm.g ofa prisoner should not exceed three (3) hoW'sft
the time ofar,rest, U!ZJess exigent cirCUin$t4nees exist.
;:
DESK OFFICER! s. Direct arresting qfP~i ;to :immedbltely notify the borough Court Sect"
'~RVISOR, s~eIY.i.sor ,c()ncel:9e<!,i:;lf the,,:p~lier refuses to be fingerprinted ot
ARREsT removed to the' hospital. with arrest case information including:
PROCESSlNG
a .Defendant's
.."... ,name """
.. ...
sItE .. .
b~." . Defendant's arrestnumber.,
~.
; , "c.: 'Defendant's fax:control'number, ifavailable

" d, i Date/time of refusMdi'rembval to hospital .,
e. , Whether" de'ferid'aIaf'has."l;)een flligerprinted; if taken to hospf
nameQ~hospital aha ,ac$WSion num~er (if applicable). '
o. . Authorizlany ·"o'.ierride"·oftiLIYESCAN" prints take'n. ':,
a. Make appropria~e c;omman~f Log entri'es detailing the reasons "'
the overriDe, ..' " ';'", '
NE\V • YOR~, • CITY • POLICE • DEPARTMENT

122
PATROL GUIDE .. ';

"
.. . "
PROCEDURE NUMBER: DATE\tFF&;T~ " '

. '\ . _REYJSJ9N NIJ~Bl!~ PAOEI
208-11 01/0112000 t
. .- 30f3
,. .~" "__~"'''·'4'~·'':-/l''l'Vr.<':f·':,;;: .• :~- :.' ::'" '.:' \" ,'t, ' .' • • ..t,< .
NOTE Overrifa. WILL 0JofLY: !.~Jf9lf§', aft~r ft.o/:. :(4) q!le!!,p~ have ~n 11'{l!d4 to roll an
acceptableprint. When superVisor t:oncurs llu:u the rtyecled print Is /he best t!zat can be
taken (i:e.,finger bumt, disfigured. etc,). the "LlVESCAN" operator will '"ANNOTA.TE"
the rejection (AD!? NOTEJ, f!ltq r~e "UVESCAN" computersys,tern.
..," ,.-
If "LlPESCAN" bet:cmt!s inf!pen:rble, ~ notfIY the Marrogeinent lr(Of1T1IIJkJn ~
Division (M1SD) :Hl):(JJ. QI!SI(;.;([2/2] 374-38(0), and if ~ be gukJed.by p.G. 208-12.
.'.;' "AlJemate~jOr.rrltfmJf1tl/Processing In 1he Event OfONnptJJerFai1ure. c,
, _: 1, • . •"~
BOROUGH 7. ~e.djp,f~~Y.~ : ha:Y~ ~propri.~. '·'NQ:r:ePADn data entries and

COURT co~pnd~g '~~GNED. DISPOSITION" field entered into
SECTION "OLPAn computer. ~tem, .when notified that a prisoner refuses to be
SUPERVISOR fingerprinted or is removed to the hospital. .
ADDITIONA.L ~e <lLIVESCAN" m4chi1Je should remain. "0..11/." a,!-d the scanner covers 0/the machine
DA.TA "CLOSED• .. wh"en not in use.
The 'uVEs~c maChine mutt be "reaJlibra/ed" at least ones per tour to ensure that prints
transmitted.are aq:eptable to the I<le@ftcadon SecJion and the Division of Criminal Justice
Services (i.e., not 1()() doric Of too lighl. etc.). BUJ)' commands must "recalibrate" morefrequenJJy.
"
The "UvEsCAN" machJne. scanner platfl'!S must' be cleaned after each prisoner is
fingerprinted. The "UVESCAN" machine is to be Cleaned only with authorized cleaning
materials, (i.e.• <lWindex with Ammonia D) .. "Lilhopads'1, these materials. in addition to
"Com Huskers Lotion, .. may be requ;slrionedfrom the Quartermaster Section.
If the "UVESCAN" computer be<:omes inoperable because of damage to the machine.

particuiarb' to rhe scanner pklren. the vendor will ,-eplace rhe damaged scanner platen and
deliver it to the Management In./bnnalion Systems Division; In circumstances in which there is
suspicion ofintelltional damage. the desk officer will make all entry ;'1 the Command Log and
. initiate ,an in'll-esrigaJion .(see P.G. 202-/4. "Desk- Officer'). A,ny evfdence ~f imentiOllal
damage to any ~chine will ~ in (In immediate investigation and appropriate action.
. ' . ' ,"
Routine operational inquiries conceming "UVESCAN" and the On Line Booking System
should be direCled to the borof!gh t;Qurt $f«;lion co.nc.erned. twettry-four (24) hours, seven
(7) ~ a week. OR the CriminiJ.,fuslkeBureaiJ ar·(21i; J74~SJOj. during business hours.
Technical probler;u anri "LiVEsCAN:' Ofl;'!~eS a~~(o be 'reien-ed to the Management

Information Systems Division (MISD) HELP DE~K at (212) 374-3800.
RELATED Fingerprin/able Offinses (P.G. 20~-08)

PROCEDURES AlJemaJe Procedures For F'mgerprint Processing Due To ComputerSystem Failure(p.G, 208-12)
Hospitalized Prisoners (P.G. }JO~O})
Prisoners Requiring Medfca//Psyc!lialric Treatment (P.G. J /0-04)
FORMS AND ON LINE BOOKING SYSTEM ARREST WORKSHEET (PT>24:i-159)

REPORTS
~EW • YORK • CITY • POLICE • DEPARTMENT

123
~ ..
"
~ ~..'
, ~.; '.
'"i "
e • ."'
•• ,
, '
.....
" i. ,',',
' . .,.
, ,
, ",
.,,
.: -.-. ~,., . .. .; 5 ~ .., .'
. ;"
o. ",," .",'
" '
'I •
, "
.... \ .
. .
. ' .'. :) \
SEW • YORK • CITY • POLICE • DEPARTMENT

124
PA,rROL, GUIDE
REVISION NUMBER: PAOE:

10f3
, "
PURPOSE To pr0ce4;,~~~taFii'stafiorihouse.
: ~ .:"":• ...--;)-:l"," ~t,;··1tiY\.~ .". l :.: .. - .: ':,'
PROCEDURE: ',., Wh~t:l~~lllit19unl9';nr~Jj'et,bf the se:rvice ,is ready to 'process an aITeSt after
, coIIJ.plefitlg'Vie'~Uiii1ar
• .")"': if ; •••" ". '
~Pe3fance
•• ' .... , "
before. • tlle
~';.. '.
desk officer: .
DEsR OFFICER.'i i.'" .J '~~~:::~tqig:9~~e/~~ r~ov~prisone~

to arrest processing area, or
: :;:!:"l~bn'iJ1:'tiiesfati()nhouse"SPEClFICALLY DESIGNATED as suitable
. , ',.; :k:~()~ Uite.trQ~on~rjuvenileS;'asap~ropriate.
/'.. :2: :. ,:.,- .'Dm
..
arrest processing officer,
".. ,
Ifavailable,
. .
to assist arresting
•
officer.
.
r
,'.,I ~ ~
NOTE The iuresi pfbceiSlni' officer will]ingerpHni' prisoner' (UVESCAN) and assist the
,:' Q1Testing b.fjlcer by priividing arresl related forms. taking photographs. and conducting
neceisar:iwarrariichecks. ' . '. \" " '
ARRESTING 3... XM:MEhI:A;,TEu'Yi.i:prepare.ONLINE 'BOOKING SYSTEM ARREST

OFFICER :WORKSH:EET (pD244-1S9).
a. Ensure that COMPLAINT. REPORT (pD313-152), PROPERTY
CLERK'S INVOICE (pDS21-141), etc., casenumbexs are indicated.
DESK OFFICER 4. Review for c.ompleteness and accuracy and sign ON LINE BOOKING
SY~tEM"ARR.ESTWORKsHE~Tand return to arresting officer.
ARRESTING 5. Have ~rr~t" numb~r, generate4 utilizing On Line Booking System

OFFICER PFIIPF3 data entry.' ,".,
NOTE To correctly collo.t~ the 4ifftrent types oJ arrest~ that are processed, all al7'l!St$
generated in the dn-Line Bolikini System' will use theJollowing Arrest Processing Type
codes when entering "PF/" data:-
, •. l
. CODE
, TYPE OF AWsr iJEING PROt.§SSED
I · ,....,. .'" ..
A D.A..'r. COlt/M(fNITfCQURT(MJl)'rOWNj .
C ~ COMMUNITY codRtiiiirli:6'WN; 'ON LINE ARREST
DDESKAPPEARANCE,fleKEt"' "
J JUVENILE rNON"PlNGERPRiNT;tBLE OFFENSES ONLf)
o .ON LINE ARREST ".
V VOTDEDARREST
" Person.nel entering da!a into t,:!~. Oil-Line, E!oqking Syslent !!!EE. ascertain tile correCI
.. - "Arr~t P.r~essing Type" codehr. thf! type o[ arr~( 'beIng processed before compleling
the "PFI" emf)', (See "ADDITIONAL pA'rA[or (l glossal)' ojlhese codes and rhe I)]Je$
ojarrests thi!)' represent). . "
125
j;
t 'J
i
t·
PATJ{QL<;UIQE·:,
PIWCEDURENUM'Bsre " ': PA~EffEClW£:'
:loU',;
,.' . ,. ~
i,
'to ,.", _.'
• I ~'-., ... )_ " • • •, '. : 1'. .,' .. "~ ,,~ ~",..,. ~, :,-,/ ~~ .. ,.~
ARRESTING a. fAX' Coml*~e4,,(jk';x.JNE BOOKI~G SYSTEM <~1f:~:

OFFICE)t" WOR:KSHEE'r,(with arrest,number indicated,) to the'bi;)rough'
(continued) Cowt Section/Assistant District Attorney. for r e' ts
ON("y (viQ.eoCQn~rencing.,: BLAP), in accordance with c~e ~
processing procedures in each borouglL.
.,.' 6.
,
Haye. ~~ processw:g 9.t:U9",t;l; ~gew.rint prisoner utilizing LIVESCAN...,:,
f .~~:~.8§Sis~,of'fh,R.~t p~singotRcer:. . "
.,
7.
a. Have photograph(s) of prisoner taken
"
b:.l?rep~~,o~ 'f\ecb~ fo~ (e.~.• COMPLAINT, REP,~~l'
, ,PROPERTY CLIW:.U"L'S INVOICE), etc.,
, , J .. • _,;' ~
.. t" • • ., • ',~ \:',
c. ~¥e ,~¥ pecessaiy w~yhecks CQnqucted. '

~': ;.~e,Prl.S~'~Jler. M~Y!?}p~t, Slig p~weevgenemted.. '"
8. Request the' desk officer to have the prisoner removed to appropnat
pdso~e.r.mWC~ ,~.b~ed 9n,l~ gui<;lelines. , ' . ,'r '
a.. , '.' ~ning Qffic~r~.m~t.~v~ P.risoner Movement Slip ,with pho
and a copy of ON LINE BOOKING SYSTEM ARRES
WORKSHEET with arrest number and check digit indicated.
9. Complete anY'additioqa! ¢esfpaperworlc;'as necessary.
10. Have desk officer reView'documenttfor'completeness and accuracY.
11. . ,Prepare:affiGa\rit based on the.county District Attorney's method ofprepamti '
~. ;
ADDITIONAL CODE TYPE OF4fJRESTBEING PROCESSED AND EXPLANATION

DA.TA" • ~',~.: I",'" '~<' .~~;'!~~ '\:'? ',";". " ~ . ,t ~ ,'·rt
A. DESKrlff.lW?Al;fCE,TICKE.T 90WVNU:X COURT (MIDTOWW used when.
D.A. T. is issued and returnable to Midtown Communit)} Courl.
C· coAii{w(rr'l:diIRT rMrQrOl!M QN LiNE ARREST used when a cQ~l,'

processes an on line atTest to be a-rrliigned in the Midtown Community C()urt, j ;,
~
D D$SK APPEARANCE TICKET used when a command processes' a

A:Ppearan-ce ticket. .
J JUVRNlLE (liON FINGERPRlNT4BLE OFFENSES ONLYJ. used 10 prot ':

juvenile delinijuent an:eSts !hal 'are-1U)tfmgerpriniabfe offenses. '
o ON IlNP'4MEst use4, ~o on line arrests, as well tis gJIjuveni/t: .Procw

thal ar~jin.i.tirPfintabl~(j~'#tidmgjuvenile offenders, 'recogs, and juveniles' ,
e/igil?leffir re,CbgniztlTl~e)< ". . ... "
'. ~ . .' . . '. ....;,. '" "..;
V VQIDED ARREST us¢ When proceSSing a voided atTest under P.G. 2IO~{
"Release o[Prisoners-OtMral'PrOcedure. ..
Rega~d1e.ss ofwhether. rke arresl packdge has been previousiy/onvarded. th'e prisoner .
be deliwE'rI!tI /0 the boro/(ib' Q;~rt SectioJlftci~irj·l!.xpf!ditious~r. DeJ(l)~\' o/more thanjii
(5) how~'fi'om'time a/airestfor lineups, prisoner debriefing, prisoner medical attentioJ
"j..... Il'iII hi! rqJil1'!n/ ;:'. :dephtJI/(: (/1 til(' {/PIJ/:()j)l'ioh' ;'fll'rIlr.~h ("II/I', S\,<.:ritJII. IIs./i,f/tJllox: '
NE\V • YORK • .CITY • POLICE • DEPARTMENT

126
PATROL. GUIDE"
PR.OCEDURE JIl1JMBER: DATE EFFE(:'nYl;: _- RE.'{.lSJC)N NUMBER.: PAGE::
208-15 0110112000 30f3
ADDITIONAL . _}.fa.nhattal'l .(112) 374-:.J.~38

DATA Brooklyn (718) 875-6586
(continued) Bronx (718) 590-2849
Queens (718) 520-9303
Staten /slo,n,d- (l18) 876-8493
~LATED Ari'es~ - &",,!Vf!1To Department Facility For Processing (p.G. 208-(2)

PROCEDURES -A.rrf!St~Genera/Processing (P.G. 208-03)
Arrest - General Search Guidelines (p.G. 208-05)
Arrests-SeCurititMeamre.s (P.G. 208-06)
Alteriuite Procedure For Arrest Number Generated As A Result OJ Computer
Failure {P.G. 208-10) .
.4ltei'ildteProcedure For Fingerprint Processing Due To Computer·System Failw-e' (p.G.
208-12) -
Arrests - "PINEST" Clu:cks And "NITRO" Debriefing (p.G. 208-21)·
Release OfPrisonen-General Procec4tre (P.G. 210-13)
FORMS AND ONLINE BOO.f[ING SYSTEM ARREsT WORKSHEET (PD244-1S9)
REPORTS COMPLAINT REPORT (PD)IJ.152)
PROPERTY CLERK'S INVOICE (PDS21-141)
NE\V • YORK • CITY • POLICE • DEPARTMENT

127
"
i~
.:I:'
I,
o
~ •••• '. t
THIS PAGE llYTENTIONALLYLEFTBLANK..

. " :) ~ • •,. " • ~ , ",: . • , , I '. '-:1 ....,. ._ ._~ "'l";~.;.~" , ~
. , - ..
"f; ..
• I .
• .,
.. I,
~ ' ..
• ~'.; .' '. I' • ~:/!" •
:.. '~'''' \ .
. '.. .
~ .t', r
":.>' •
NEW • YORK • CITY.· POLICE • DEPARTMENT

128
: PATROL GUIDE
1--
.. Section:
t' DATElSsu!b: PAGE:

01/0112000 • :-·'.k~'Ul1O'lAOOO· ';.'~. lof4
PURPOSE To record ~d'iJ:ii~raf¢~~as~ when members of the servi~e, both uniformed or

.:1;..... are 'A~.:...
en&y~ ~~~
0..
::9'. :.,,:. .:,' ... ,.,. ~
,.... •
.._ •.
" •• , A' •
PROCEDURE When a membet"~f the service is arrested:
DE~TION CR)MlN& y!OLATION .-F~ the ,puwose of thi$procedu:re, means any

viQla~Q~l).fJ.~~mwl.tl~~On, whethercommitted Within New York State or
outside'.of the!!~~"~f'~ch a; p~al~':oftt~ermof itnJ)rlsoDl1lClnt mll.~ be
iD;1pQ$.~~lnlt~~Q\~:inq1\\cle:p~I:,~olations; tmffic infr!1Ctions- (ath.or than
!~. ~~;!,sccn~: . ~~ 'an !J:1~~ . "!i~~~t,.tePo~g and orivingWhile8.bi~fty
tro~aI)d Vlol~ons' qf ·law, n1leof it'Cgl1lation when 8p'etSon.al servIce
summons received contemplates a civil penalty only. .
wsooWrrHmcrt '.~.
~ ,. 1 ••• u"'. \,:' ~ ,,:...
MEMBER OF 1. Immydiately notify .~estbig aU~hOrity or: position as a member of the
THE SERVICE Ne~ York City ~olice e~paitnieht. . .
ARRESTED 2. Promptly no~1Y cl.e.sk officet, preqinct of arrest, of details if arrest effected
by law e~forcem(}Qt agency other than New York City Police Department.
. .~;
NOTE A.ll memPers. of rJr.it $~ce:\(uniformed or civilian), who neeI've Ci personal service
summo;,s,.jQr a crii!dna~ ;violation. are rei[,rired to immediately notify their commanding
officer. andpro\'ide Ihe com~ing officer wich a ~op)' a/rile summons.
DESK OFFICER 3. ~~ediately notifylnte~.a1.A~air~ ..B4~eaU· <;oll\!pand Center.

4. Immedi<;uely notify precinct Gommapgeridiity captain.
5, .~romffitl:r. P-9,.tif,y ~~~_ 9P.e.f!J.~QrLS.tJ~! ~d' i~~lude:· ,
., a.'. ean~Dt:I.o·. f
T'uR!·,. . "t'. i~' .,.~ '. .',
·i..,.~.-9 ~St.! • .
b. ~lacr.9. Wf9~ep:~St.: .. :-.;k;· :;1.'. ~ •...
C~ "P.r~~J~f;>n ~ttnemp;~r;~:)'r pl~c.~ where he will be available for
inte[View . . , ., '. " '
d. lcie~titY ofaU: invol~ed in the in~ident
persons
c . ' M~!?r.JlJ.. whtC?~.:mergber b~~e involve9 ,
f. Si~<:ss p'T ilJ.j",ry Qf member or other persons involved
g. IdentitY and statements of witnesses
h. Title an~Ldesc(ipti'on of the law violated
i. . Identity oflaw ehf(}rcemenragency mak:ing arrest (feder3J, state or local)
J. " Specific ch~rges ~gainSt the member' - -
k. Date and location of court appearance, ifknown
I. Interim or final disposition, if~ny.
6. Mak.~ ~ntry of nOlitiw'1tion in Tckphoni.: RI.:":IIi'J <Hit! illt;hl\,k itklilily \11"
prccin.:; comm<lndcr/duty caplain notified.'

129
"
PATROL GUIDE , " • #
", :.:.J'v.
•.'
• .~;. I
DATE EFFECTIVE: ."...... . . REVISION NUMBEll.: PAO£:' "
20~11 .~. . ... 20(4
PRECINCT 7. Mak~ cen~n·<ait~ediI)fm1ber.ts commandfng officeri~ notifie~:t

. .f
\" ".
'~:'
COMMANJ>ERJ 8. Notify patroi borough p()mmander, borough of arrest.

DurYcmAIN
.'
PATROL' 9. Assign captain or above to conduct investigation.
BOROUGH
COMMANDER
CONCERNED
. ':i~
RANKING
. . " .
10. Commence 'immediate .investigation and interview arrested member :
OFFICER witnesses, if a n y : ' . '"
COrroUCTING
. 11. Submit report ·on Typed .Letterhead ~o ·Chief of Department withi
~g~TION twenty-four (24}ho'ittS.:·;· .~' .. ,
12. Ascertain status of case no later than twenty-four (24) hours after ea.
court appearance of·member~ " . .
13. Prepare a report on Typed Letterhead indicating status of case
,,
1" adjournment dates and foI1Ward to: "
, a. First Deputy Commis::Iioner
,
!.
b. Chief pfDepartment· .
-i'
! c. Chief ofPersonnel '
d. Chief·oflntemal. Affairs
e. Department Special Prosecutor'or Department Advocate's Offi '.
as appropriate
f. .Patrol botbugh commander concemed~
14. Direct arrested membet'to immediately notify his commanding officer'
charges are dismissed..
ARREST~D
'<0, '
OUTSIDE CITY
MEMBER OF 15. Immediately notifY arresting authority of position as a member of t'

THE SERVICE New York City Polic:e Department . .
ARRESTED 16. Immediately .notifY· Opaatio~ Unit, comply with the remainder of step:'
subdivisions ."3," to'ur', and inclOOe identity oflocal police authorities mvol
17. Notify commanding officer'\vitho~t delay. .
. .', ' ; " " . : . '; .. : .. -
NOTE Commanding officer 'will co'nraci' airested member wirJiin twenty-four (24) hours ~
court appearance andascertairi status a/case. ~
.,'.'
A.ll members ofthe se/vice (uniformed .Qr civilian). who receive a personal summons
a ct:frninal violation. are ,required ~o imm.ediately noti./Y their commanding officer.
provide the commanding Officef':YJi.(h a cOPY'ofthe summons.
!~
:I
.~,,
~j
:j
1
I
I
)
I
, ~t:"\V • VOI?J< • rf-rV • POliric • J)f.'fl/d1Ti\·1!='NT
130
P.A; . , "
," .
;'" ; DAn; Ef'fEC11VE: ... ~ ~
.. " . 3 0(.4
~T_ ~:·. ,::;~" .NnTIFY . ,. ,

Immediately notifY'Int~ Affaim:'~Bureau Command Center,
-following: ", ,~'·::-:~iJ? . ':'.',' . :
• W~~~~rJl ~c"'~~d ,, .- ,C9.~anding Officer,

. Oran.ge Of·Putnam PatrPl BOfQugh Bronx
md the
t .' NassauOr.Sli'ff'6lk
, .. .. 'Coti1Inanding "Officer,'"
r
t .1 • .~.
. >- !-? . '':.
: ..";. ' ·"~:;'i;~:':'~'.' :~':' "; "'. ;... ,,:'
' 'Patrol Borough Queens North
, '''bfSo-u~ as,appropriate
I,
'.. 19. Notify cb1:W#sudhig
officer of ~est~ member. -. .
a. \.'. ':If;~d :is '·elosed.-' -matee1notifi~on at' 0900 houis~ 'next
~.
i
..,
~'
f·
. :,·~#h1~·:~Y;,·!:~:. ' ', _ ,',~~,:,;:,~::.:"',' '" .
PATROL ·20. Assign a captain or abo:Ve.J#>:c;x>nduct investigation.
BOROUGH I" .. 'l,
COMMANDER '. 1 .' '"io-,'

, -
,OR Cl,IIEF\OF. . I'
iNTERNAL
AFFAIRS : '., : ,.' . .., :
RANKING 21. Communicat~ by 'telephone' with ~esting authorities to detennine if there

OFFICER are witnesses to the incident.
CONDUCTING
INVESTIGATION , ~. '.
NOTE Ro.nking,officer assigned is QU!horized to use a Deparlment vehicle wjthin city and the
sL"C (6) residence counties w~thouL prior,pennission;
..
'.;. ..; .
22. Advise the supervising officer, Operations Unit, offacts.

23. Submit report On Typed Letterhead to the Chief of Department within
twenty~four (24) hours. .
24. Ascertain status of case no later than twenty-four (24) hours after each
court appearance of metnber..
25. Prepare and forward.a report, indicating 'status and adjournment date, to
First Deputy Commissioner. Chief of Department, Chief of Personnel,
Chief of Int~al Affitirs. Department Special Prosecutor ,or·Department .
Advocate's Office (as appropriate), and patrol borough command<:r
responsible for the investigation. .
a.. Include arrest number; docket nwnber, and jurisdiction in this report.
IN ALL CASES
MEMBER OF 26, Keep commanding officer informed of status of case at least once every
THE SERVICE thirty (30) days and include:
ARREStED a. Adjournment dates
b. Final disposition
c. Tf appeal made
d. D'isposilion of uppeal.
27. NOli fy commanding ofticcr a$ soon a<; possible if chargcs ar¢ dismis$cd.
. :':E\Y' • YORK • CITY - POL'leE"- 'l)EPARTMENT

131
PATROL Gl)IDE
.: , .... 40,..... ·
. _ ..'; '. . ...... . ",
I, " ..,...
c6~ING
OFFlCE~
ARRESTED
MEMBER
DEPAR'I"l\D;Nt;' 30.. Obtain a "Certificate o~:'p~~\~()Dr ijom the appropriate jurisdiction

ADVOCA1:E ' ,V~; conviction (or plea) of the member of the service, with sp ,
, ~~on to crimes involving domestic violence, upon receipt ofnotifipati ,
'. .'4 -~._ "". ~;~ ~':..{: ~ oj.':.:, :(;. ...~,.4.,1-:., ....:.: ." ,>";'":! . , :
RPu'TEI! ' l!oliJjC4t!olfS In,C¢a¥i,4.ir.e.ft Sf:tu!zliof!S' (f4. 208-69) '"
, PROCEDURES Prepara~ion (j/~ ~S~.IJ.~~ (f.,~-.2~6-05) .
Interrogaliol;- O/Membet'$ Ol'l/ie .Service (p.G. 206-13)
Susp'enS~~ Ffoin ~tt--p;iiflii1ned Mt:.mber OfT/te.'Service (p.G. 206-(8)
ModifiedAssignmen'l (P.O: 206-10) :--- '
Cause For Susptnsltm Or Modified Assigninent (p.G. 206-07)
R~;ew OfArrest Cases InvOlving A Member, OfThe Service As A DefendanJ·(f.G. 20
, , "':' ,'. ' .... ~1.1 ...
FORMSAND Typed Letterhead ' ;,;'1
.llBJ'OR'tS ,
• "4 .....
" , ..... ". I • '.. !. ",' , :,'.~ -. .. • . '.: . :' . ;'
.~." ,. .
.,'..." ".
.-
..• ',' :" ~ .....
'\'
..... . '..i',
, ", . ~ ,".
,',. "
.. :' ~
•' ::0, " " '.':'.~.' ";',!if'S;" '" ::'.( .' . .
, ' : ,.1
~J .:' r
. '. " .
. . . ':
, " ',' .
NE\\' .~: 'YORK • CiTY • POLICE· DEPARTM~NT

132
PATROL GUlDE
Section: Arrests P~\RNo~. 20~-S2.
.
. .'
. ;'.~ f.~t":rt:~C·VWLA:TIONS
p.~!""'."i*~~"'~'''"9''iOEi''-~'~'' "~. '~": ..", ~ ..•.... _... ~ . . ;~~J'
QATJ3'I~I3OQ:1,". ";"\'; ::'.!;' . tb'N.N,UMBER:
..•• ."
..... oi~o .."'ooo···,"·:; ~'''''f'''''~
I~ f;:., > h.~
' . ,.:'; .. :. . ..' . . :~ or I
PURPOS~ To ~or~ ~~/~~'~~:~~o~ o~the Traffic. Laws.
. .".
PROCEDURE Upon ~~!~,f! ,p<?~~!?-r vidolation of ~c re~ations, fol~ow appropriate
arrest p roces!ffig~C\':QQtes
, ,',. '-"~~l"!,.;.,.::''t'~'' " ..an
•
:' .
' .
. I " ./. ~ ,,~.• ,_., ..,,,:::"~"" I L' . : . . " ' .
1. C;".. ,e ,,;V~~p.~ <?~ :r~c Regul~tio~. if the offense' is a violation of

~~tli" ,.~~~:!S~~atfb~im~ th~ Yehlcle Traffic Law. .
2. Qu .• ,,~;'§pm"~d'u~ the FINES'T:'systeth to determine if vehicle is
rep;3rt~ ~tdfen'atid verify Damean:d'~cIIess of registered owner.
,.
.: }:. ~ .1'" : : ... ',- ~."". i ." . ''',' •
.'
DES~ OFFICER 3. ~~~#if~a¥\tj~~,'lhpxJ~ .ait~ p~o~ .\1ol~ti~.ns where appli~le and
iIifotm 'th~ ~g officer of additional Charges for presentation to the
Pistric~ ~ttom~< ~: .,.' ,.. ,', _' , ' ,
h
4. Enter on ON LINk BOOKlNG SYSrEM ARREST WORKSHEET
~ (pDZ44-1S9), ifatrested'on tiaffic warrant:
! a. '''SW'' under arrest number
"
,
. b. ' " 'Warran:t
,
part..~,
5 .7 etc:;'under.caption
, , ' . " ,
"ChargeS and Specific Offense"
,
c. ParticularS of warrant under '~Details. n ' . .
COMPLAINT REPokT(PD313-1S2) is notprepared.
FOBMSAND COMPI4Nl'REPoJi.T (P'D313-152) .. " ,

,REPORTS ON LINE BOOJI:ING'Syst£M ARRESt WOMsHEET (P/>244-159)
"
I
~
~
,;,
,
"
, ..
-
"
NEW • YORK • CITY • POLICE '. DEPARTMENT

133
, '-'.
: "'... " t
'. ~.' . • ~.:,r. ,~'."<' " -~ ....
• -t",' .":" r, ;;'.\
:, .'1' f:t"- 0,..
j, ' ..
~, .~
• .,* •
..... ~: ..... -~~ .... "
•....~: ;;; .•
.,
:. ..,. .... ~ ~.,,:
"
,.
" " ....... ,- . ..,
,~~~..-~. .
.'
',:. {:~:I. '~'J,~':

"'11-
" ...
"
.....
~ " >1' ••••• ~.~_r.l.:~..;:t 'C~·ir
.
' I .• "'-.
. '." : .!."~.:: ~ :,
.:....~
to.
.',,' ,. ":',' : '.~ .~. ... ,:.; "

. .: .'
. ,
~ ..
'.,j! - '•• ": " .', -··t..·:,. ::,:' '/ ..
,'
;"~ :
; ,
,"
.... ," ~. :'. .;
:\EW • YORK • CITY • POLICE • DEPARTMENT

134
PAGE:
lof4
PURPOSE "': ·.~ehiaS·t¥ith a sUSpended or revClked lice[)$e•..

~-:~ ~~·F,· ·,'r· ~"t,,:·:· ! ., •
.PROCEDURE ~~ ,.x , ...·~~tJi~:·~~ :obkv~' or h.as reas063ble Cause: to

believ~.~.~~1t·~vAA ,..' ',: , a, vehi~l~ has,a ~pended or revoked driver's licerlse;
·'4.../:·. '. . .-
.UNIFQltMED . 1. f!.t!E».l~tibJ1i'of ·¥Chic1e. 'and Traffic law and remove
'R~~1~9~~1~~/~~i~~
MEMBEB:OF
·THE SERVICE 2.
.'.3.~ . .f&P.}.~d 4i91u~e:~~W9~01i. . M~e .arrest folders.
.,';':;;ntJ)~~·L
~ures' regardin . issuance of a
"':~, ,':~~_ ~.,', ··i.:.¢1t!rt~~~69-~lj·Mdste;s
..,' . 5,6, 7, and 8~
, . ~ below, ifprisOner'iS chaJ;ged with Aggravated Unlicensed Operation of
. '. a.~~l' V~e~~.(.t\P9)}~ ~~.gree~c;\Js o.therwise eligible.
4. . COmply V-1th ~~ pe~e!l~ ~ process.itlg procedures"
)! . . -. ." . .
I NOTE A.ll perso~ arr~tcdfor dfiving.wi!h·/Wo (2) or IhOre sus.pe!1Slofl$. involving at least two
@) separate dates w.i.11 ~be eJigible/or a DfJSKAPPEARANCE TICKET.
5 . , PIW~.~e:~!qlLq~gd~()urt·.rq1at~..;funnSr·(m· addition' to '()N LINE

... , ,B9~l~G .~X$~M;lY9~KSHEWf;' (pD244-1S9) and other arrest
related paperwork): '.. -.'. "~;' :,' .
a. . , , ~1$>~~Q.p~mQN..sUSPENDEDIREVOKED I.:lCENSE
". : ...: '(p~~}.iRJ;:·"S'QPrqtmNQ PEPOSmON .. SUSPENDED/
·r •. ,', . ·;~Y'Q~tt~S~»RONX~D~A) .
b. 'PRE-ARRAIGNMENT NOTJlllCATION REPORT (pD244-153)
c. ~gnmerit C3id (Misc. 4661) .
"d.. . .p.oli<;e·O~e~,I'~· Co.~ Availability Schedule (Misc. 470a)
.,'e.t: "'"
.r,~nerJ..tf9.Yem..ent:Sljp (Mise. ·20l1..A 8/84) .
DMV Certificate Concerning Violation -of Law' ReI~ing' to
Vehicles (A·246), for the vrL Misdemeanor and Felony
'. g~ ....:' '~~'.~.BO}?iY~;Qf:.'ROPERTY CLERK'S MOTOR VEHI(~LEI
,:;:.\~~~~~~I~~"9:DSll-J.47),~fp~ated.
6". ,Prepare 'Cri~)7~utt S'itriimons, 'fot" u'lclusion in arrest package. for
violatlon.6f:NTL' 8ft (0 (a)" or 5 (1 >«2) (a), appropriate, as
. a. • '''''Do t)..X5t:ebler"datiii>ri"SL$1i:Oo)l$'.··' . , .
b . ' t~oin~lele:l'~J~1"i.;~f'Ck'M':' l'it'fu""" .ion" on rear of original co of
. ';S~6r&:~($'~~W~t
:,. 'J-t.
<' • ~ ••
~~,~~::,~ti :nally observed...", if approp~;te),
t.,. r\ ... ,,' " • ~ • - . .-
.
#
7., . Fingerprint'p~I~~ner ,~.t,~Mti:ng.!~~pY~s~an.·~

135 .~~_: j~
,
.\
t',.
.
.'
:,.. '. ,' ..... ~"
" ,.' '~.~;. 'j' •. ~. < 1.:.,.\ y.~. :;: ·~t.lf ~.r·,f··';, ': '::..,l.!,~~'" ,,'. ;' I·;' >' .. '),'; \'.4* ~.,~ ".: • •
NOTE ", . ·p~·~. ~:~ll(3)fa):/tf*eJJz;S1ftiJ! ift:~i4~'ii'~:~;8f.8PI:j"·("u:

thrmJili ii"j QndStep~~6eIaw. A9iin.ipti!,dmitStIJ1'I1nOt1§..wil1rJClbe rnrxndmfti1ittt:QStt ~:
.~. ,,~ ~"":~'.\"""" ~"
. . : " • . t·, f" '':', .: ",.:, 1-,"·;:-: :.-; '.',': 1.
8
.; .*' , :-
A~h ORIGINAL copy .ofthe Criminal Court Summons to SUPPOR .:

=~~.
·8.
DEPosmoN-susrENDEDJREVOKED DRIVER'S LICENSE.
THE. SEltYIClt • ':~ •.t,.! .... ) •• '; ,":"i!"
..... "'. ..-.!." ;.. ('..•:...•. :".". 0 •• ~,~ '• • • ~~;.:' )~~';. ;(:,',,
(~Iltinu~) ",< ,..:: .• :': . .... ~'''.' ,
NOTE T1?e. onl)f CrirrJ!J.J9lpourl.S~m;n.Q.& th4J. w.ill.be·prepared will be the one Whickf~~
~.~~.!l'X8#*~:~~~rt:~~he;;p:;;':iI~ Any<; :
·vtolO!loll ·w 1~~O.f. ~$.e Y/!filCle,'!F!iJm.~, Law shall be rtetmled .. adt4.,.'l :
...1 ~U.'!?~ ,the tJN.:!/Mi i!.QI!/fJ.1!!llS'! 'M ~T WORKS11EB7'.. Crim~
. '. 'COIl1't $ldttmO~ .'fi~I/p.lll'edfp.r. ;lggrOM .. ~J, ()n!ice~ed Operation ojJe1lSt!S shall
ro •
. 'attachedio.tli~stJlfioR1'I1V(iD$p'(jsttl3ft' ':" ".: .

.of .... '" • '. ~ ...... , . ' ',i> • • :-'4: ~ f" .... .;. . '...•• :';_.~~ .. '!~:. • .
. .:':. :···9.... :" CoxrlIscate ~ver~s li~e ~~'~mPIY with P.G. 209·26, "Suspended"
Revoked Vehic'k' OperOJor IS License. " '
NOTE .' Dure'g;'d sUbd~visions ~'a";and ;'b" 3 and the 'WOTE" following oj step s~iv},' .
"Jb" in P.G. 209-i6; "SuspendeiJOrR1!vohid Vehicle Operator's License."
1O. Infonn desk officer when 'attest pr60~sing' J.'s eo!riplete.

DESK OFFI~~R. 11.:'. Review'all fG~~ for ~~l>I~~~fieSs'¥d acc~cy. ';
'12. . ''Ensure. t:bat.,alt i1~pli6a\)le &t6'gories on SUPPORTING DEPOSITIO
are checked off. ::""""';'~";.':' "...'; "
a. o,r: Hav~ arr6~t1t{g,offi~~i(S1gn·ancl date; ,
13: Have.prisoner (hoi'eli'gibl~\;fOi a'DAT) and related court papers deliver'
.,.. to b0r(i)u@\,~ourl:Sec(ion"J.IDd cottiply with "Citywide Expedited A
.. . \• n .
p,.rocesSlQg.- ' .' ' . # -t .:...
,,0
( ..:.'""
0 . . . . . '0 '.
."
'
•
BOROUGH . 14~.· Exa.niirie court paperS 'fOI"cbJrtpleteness and accuracy. '

COURT 15~ Make neeessmj'entrl'es'Oh"Court papers and"process as an::"orrline"arr .
~UPE:RVISOR. :, I . • ' . ~.# .' ~ '"' ....~.~ . ! ':",' . " .'.... , . : " . .
'" • ....• : ... ,
. . ~.
AD,~rrIONAL" " ~. ": Section 51 r-b-, "SeizUre And Redemption" OjUnlawfidfy Operd,(ed Vehicles" requif,~i
DA.TA . that. upo,n making tin ·b.rresl.[oi Aggi'itvaied'·Ynlicensed Operation Of A Motor Vehic,
· J~,~r. 2'~ Degtee ~pmmi#,ed inc'hiS.prese:nce, a uniforined member of the service
. remoye. or arrangefor r!!e remova/of(h¢ 'Vehicle {()"the Property Clerk. if:
a. .,' The ope~~!p'r. g: ff'e r.egls,~er.,ed Q,wn.er. of the vehicle, OR
b. I;he. v..~/~cle i~. 'W~ pr.op~,:~y~eg!'~~f!e4r., OR .'
c. Proofoffinandal ,S~~f:lr!ry,(ins.l/rr;rnce card) is 1101 produced. OR
d. Wh'/J'fi (J person. 'olllt:;' t/rall '/J!{ or!ermor. is /he reKi.w!n!d owner (lIId Slit
person or ono/her. proper(v lic~rised 'and authorired /() pDSsr:SJ and operate rh
.·ehicl". i.l· IIn( /1I'('SL'llf. .
NE\V - YORK- CITY", POLICE • DEPARTMENT

136
.·.t~, ~ ... ,'

.. ' .
ADDmONAL '<,If;i,tNfsPIN 03' Qi,'lmpounded~e"(see P.G.

DATA '.~ ~dildtlg" Vt'iJIiriio,u Bureau &oJJiaw Removal
I
(continued) ~SIYttp6unded 'vehiCle 'win remain OJ the precincl

·~o/ifQ"P.if1 iIfJ?e/#.~!O·~ejie~m the vehicle. the vehicle
. ".'l/iJ""8lditb~ ''J)J.#,rJiJ~,'~}t,~he registered owner must
. ~ • i!f~R)J.'fI;l.. .'tJNtt~OPERATION OF A
fj.j(jtMi'i1te:-¢thiC/~ /vis 'beJlt"lmpoUnded YehicJes seized
punritiRt't6'1' . ,__ . "ii; nf,the releasea unless:
a. The" pflt#qp rqdeeming the vehicle has furnished satisfactory evidence of
itiU'ttlil't,git:_fMdnciaJ secUrity. . . ,
b. ReasoftaliJe:'t1!'ebfovlil and storage costs have been paid. (See ~.G. 218-44,
'''Remova.l4ndc Stor.age Charges ").
. t...... :... ok ' . : • . : .. ~~ .< ;'.'
. &mov~ ixiuJ Slp,.age charges sh.a11 not be re.quired of the registered owner if the
im]H'JuniJeiJ vehicle was s~/ert or was rented or leased pursuant to a written agreement
for aperiod of thirty (3()J d'!JS or less.
c. Where the vehicle Was o~rated by a ptrson who, at the time o/the oJlense. was
the owner, thejolloWing'ls reqliired: ' "
(1) Satisfactory evidence that the fegiStered owner or other person seeking
co redeem the vehicle has a license or privile.ge to operate a mOlor
vehicle .in New YorA:;. :AND ", ' ,
(2) Sotis/actdry evide.ncellhat,criminal ch,arges have been terminatea and
J.
'k)'" ..
'l ':)r:
lhat anyjlne imposed as a result ofa cOTlVicrion has heen paid, OR
(3) A certiflCate mued ,by Ihe cour~ in which th~ crimi11t11 aelion was
commeneed ordering"release ii/ihevehicle 'prior to judgment or in
compliance ojthe interest ofjuslice. OR ' . . '
(4) A. certificate issued by-the District Attorney, or other officer authorized to
prosecute,such c~arge, waiving the requirement that the vehicle be.held
In ell Aggr(NQ!ed Unlicensed Operatlcn 01a Motor Vehicle }JI Degree arrests, /he vehicle shall
be seized and removed to a Property Clerk.facility. As such. these vehicles 'Wi remain at wi"
precinct statlonhousefor forty-eight (4/)) hol.lr$. .The arresting offtcer shall prOcess said.vehicle
in ot:cordarK:e with P.G, 208-26, "Forfeilure Proceedings For Properl)' Seized In COlmedion
With.An Arrest." 1M Property Clerk shall COIJ./t1Cl the Legal Bureau to ascJ!11i:IJn Ifa statu!ory
forftiture proceedingwfll be C()~ fersorrs maIdng a demond/or the ntUm ofa vehIde
sefo:dpurstJtInllO ~ ~ , _piovide the same dOC1J!1fl!1(ling l!!'idence as 1'!XfUiredfcr
release ofa vehide;~ io SeCiion j 1J-b ofthe above. erctBl that p District. barney s YTl:
release is required in'tf!!.~~ ~~.~ to &dian 511-c ofthe regarrJIf!S$ ofwho m
\'W' operating the velii& aJ the tUtiiJ'6filie Offense. /11 the event said requirements are met gnd
the Legal Bureau inCli&fies that a SlatuJ.Ory forfeiture proceed'mg will not be conrmellCeC!. the
vehiCle may be releasedji-61ri' the Pt6jJeHy'CferkjaciUty. .
~ ~~. :;;1- ~'!t':". -" ~\"w '''.'~~' ,~
RELATED Suspended Or Revoked Jlehlci't!Op-er4rbras;"L7cense (P.G. 209-26)

PROCEDURES FoifeiCUll: ProceedingsFofPtbpeTty:S~itJ!i:Ifn CQhnect;on With An Arrest (P.G. 208·16) .
Safegu(tJ'dillg I't!hic!es /11 Polict! Czr.'\/od.l: (f.G. 118~ /::1
Removal Al1d SlOrage Charges (f,.Gt..~Jf$,--I4) "
,\ {oW,. r ~'hid,':: ::..~.!/( ~..s,·.'is('(i/{·(I1'k;I/J!. I 'ill/a/ion., fJww 11I.~·( !(f1C{\\ Rl'm(J\'({II'rr~/'lJm (P. (i : 12·./\',
NEW • YORK • CITY • 'PO Lfolt •·.. O'E"I>>..RTMENT

137
'. " . ,)
.:,' ,.PATROL
. . '.
GUIDE
". . • .> •
PRoc:EDuuNUi EI!i!~':"P!'!~~~~ ..: . '" ':.~
", .. ': 2C)'" •• " J

", .".
.' "'.1 ..
, , ", ' .. . .. "~.: ',",

, ~
.. .. . .::','. f.' ~ ;." ...

"
: : .;~' .: .:'"
" ". "
:
. • to "
• 1' • ,J.......' : .~, ,_ "

"
.'.: .:-: ', .. "':.... ~. I

'
.":,.'f&. ,." . ......'

' .
;'.
. .-' •. :,l. ',' ~~.. •
'I'.,.
, ~!
~... :".' , I.~'.;
: .;; . '.'~. . .. ..: .. , ' . .:. . ~.
.... .... . '

'"
,.':'
".,
. .... ';
.
, . • • : .... o,,J.
,
...::.
:.
.....
'...'
"::'.-
,:' ~'.',
~:''''.
.
'.';
• ',;" " 0'.
• ,,".:.:'
.
~ ~ ~.:
..
• •••• .. j '.. • # ••••• ~'}., "' •••
.. " : ::-. ~ - ', ... ~ ':.' .',' .,

":.1 .. " ;;:'"
;:.' .
~';'.
,"', , . . . ?,.' '. ' . .....

" .~ . . ' . ,"
,', • '.: '...' '."., ".; J
, , ~, ,.~. i' .; ~-":'" .
' .. ',
t" ,:.' .,', .; .'
.' ..
~.~~ , .~
'".- .
. '
, "
,
'.
. .' :'. . .
• ","t. :-<' .' _,' ... ,"'~ "
". '';'; ~.. .' .' e

. ,....
:', ~: '.' '.. .
, I ': -. ,;'. '-:.
...
.,.. .,., ~
.
.
," ,
. }'
.. :-;.
1 ......
. ,>:,;;~;!(;~tt!t:8
""i"( '.
- ':;~~J~·.i'< .~'.
. •. ~. .
10f3
PURPOSE
PROCEDURE
NOTE
, .4-, ; Any .O~~,j:~{prisoJ}er i~ ~ ~o~ed or Civili~ member of

~s ~epaitment. . ,
(1) M~e entry. of notification in. Telephone Record, and
. includ~. Jdentity of' precinct commander/duty captain
nQUfleq.. . ;'.: ;," ...
: e.. Cigarette ~ ·\iolatjon.
f. Fo~erf o(.,x:escription for narc9tics. . .
g. Extortion or .bribery -concerning any ~es under jurisdiction of
New.,,,<' yo*'·'~~'lei~ ... ·b.C?partment of Finarice OR criminal
impem;mttibn.tfr,~ otliclaL.
,,: - ..'
h.
.......... ..
Any 9f£enSc. 81)4 p~ner possesses mUltiple blank. social security
~ or multiple ~ial;~~tY ~~ with different names and/or
'
'be .'\....•.
num, !S. ." '..... .. . ' :.,
'.,-~ t-··- Lara~y ,'Of parking meter or its c'6ntents Q.B,' tampering with
meteJ::s. . ..f:;.;·.(:' :~J • - '.: ,
: ,\ . j. -, t,
k. . ,..
US P~sta.l Law:vio[ation$'J; ::... ~1' .,..~. ;,' .
Any offe,nse and prisoner is member of Armed Forces (Anny,

'N~VY;"A~i- :f.0~;. '~n~~ .Cea.st Gttard) Q& prisoner is AWOL
(Absent~hhqutLeave) OR a deserter~ ,
1. -. ArJ,yoffense and prisoner is impersonating a New York City
Dep~irl~n'fof Health employee.
• • '! . .
'NE\V • 'YORh: • CITY";; PO~ICE • 'DEPARTMENT

139
;. ...
·c. "20~9
.'
,
~ ~ . .. " ... .., ,
DESK OFFICER! 2. ,. Maid:~~~·~hb.tifi~dQn:·t6:·~gen~y ~~ co~~~:'c6nce~ed Wh~~~":- N~:

COUNTERPART effcttee; for~~ . ~· ~. ... . ,,':.:,1' ," ;.;~t~-~ "",: .~ .... : ~.~ ~ ~ ::i~;\~ ~~1
J; ..... •• - •••. .• ", . '.,. o'
(CO~tiDUed) . .1;,....
.'
• C~.mtJ1'l1 A~~)l .', ':j ". " .)l; lntelli~ence.Division:·
• ': ~~;.. ~n:e'n$~ "'~~i':pr~~er ~~"'). . Intel1i~e'~c~ Di~lslon
. .aoa#h4Hl.. t' Ulei-atvre. .ildyoeatlng:. ~.' ; , ,:'. ': ". . .. ;
. - .'.
... \101enl
.
~1'\;erihtow ~
•
or' Ute'" or!~~Iith1g' .:..~,.
:. .• ,.- ,-.: .~.
'.'.'"
~10\
.
government
. ...
oCthls SUttOr Nation '., . 4.. • , .•
• ~~, o~~:.!.1\!; ,~$~ner . ~" ..,~~.,,, '..' ,

flblployee or;,· ".: ," .' . '..., , '" . ,
. ~;... 4.~. .,.,. ". ~. .
(f New' Yort{' 'Stlt~ 'Dlv£slOil of' j> Division or Substante AbuSe services
;. .sUtis~ce Abu;~' Sirvlfe$~' ..,,:..,. '. ... :.: , .
•
~""'." f~~'~f1'A~¥~ii,~~~~iitY
. ' . ., .,.\{ ",.. _
.,':"::;;i, ·.:~:'.PortAuthorlty
~ ,~"~ '. . _. .J.J.~ ~
..
.~ T~B.qm .... ,lldd~ ,"od.... 'runnel )0 TBTA
h' Autiio.• ·~~)"'<
.• r.rit'f •• If>'" ',' .
,,',
" ' .,'
,:'"
. ~. . ~;tfii'" t'" ,~ ~'. . ,~. I .... I •• . • ,>
~ United Nations.•.
., . .'..- ....,. "'::; " ""~ \.
)-. IntellIgence Division
I)" New Yo.~ City Fir.4;.P'~p~rtJil~nt >. Inspector General, Fire Department
o ;":New :'YOl'k ~State', Parote, Senior )- Divtsiot,l of State Parole
Parole, Supervising Patole Officer
I) New Ybrlt·State· Pl)lic~' ':' )- Office of Chief Inspector, (SI8) 457'
,. " . , ;." , , . (Ddring non~~uslness hours notify .
. yor1iS~t~.P.Qlice ()lvision Headqulit,
(S181 4?'1-6811)
New Yo~k Stat~ 'Court 'sjrstiri\'
. . ,,·t
', ..:
,i,e
.)- New York State Court Security Se .
(2IZ) 417·5857 (Monday to Friday. 09
.. f ~ : .
.1·~·
. .. 1700 hours) or 80G-225-0256. Code 9 .
,.: .". , ... ; at all other times
'.
• Any offense, and prisoner is a member )- Provost Marshal. Fort
of armed forces of~.. rorolg!!,na~iWl· ,.' .,." .., Brookl~'n .
.
• Felony ~ prisoner is employe,e:of I).~~ . .):- PrO\"OSI Marshal. Fore
Dep~rtnient
. . . qf.D~f.~s~,.,·.~;,
. . .. '.' '~:'.' , Brooklyn
• Morals .,or" ptNerskm' ':cba'tge a:nd » Provost Marshal, Fort
prisoner ~ c~l?loy'~ 9.tj.;Y~t ~J1~eDt BrOOklyn
:;, .~q:)e~~Q.SC ";". ';'" ;'!:~"., '.':''-' >:"~', ;:J,~" . .,
.' Aoy, ~f(ense, ,,:snd ..t.' ·.. Y.9uth· ~ng, .~
involved, .. _..! "
.» Intelligence Division
• Any 9ffense., and .~ard of .~ducatioQ'b,.);> ~hool Safety DMsion

involved in any way '
• Any gramU-re~~e~'Qrre~C$, ( '> Anti-CrartitiNandalism Unit, Spt~

:'. :: ... :. . ~ :~. Operations Di\·i5ion (718) 592.6226 "
., !-ny off~~e a~d P*QJlet:'.is a.n ~m,p~one ;': )- The citY University of New Yor';
o(Tbe~ity ,U,~~V~~,in-,,~f ~...~'r. yqr~::,. ";, . Deput)· University Director of Secuf
and Puhlic: Safe',- (212) 541·0~07 .
• .'- . : • •. : : :".~I~ '. . :",,"; ,.
• Any offense. and priS:Q.n~.r is if!volyed, hi " ~ . NYC Trdde WaSle Commission, (212) &;
th~ privllt'e cartin~ i'n,di'~tr~' '", 6300. Mo"d"~' to Friday. hcc\\'ccn 1000 (
, I :;uu hllur:,. ,\ftcr IWIlI':\, cOlltact O.e.O
Field OpcnniuIl:l P\,'Sk at (Z 121.3 7'*-6620:
:"E\\" • YORK··
. CITY • PO,LICE • DEPARTM£~T " ' . (.
," -; 'I' .' ..•. .. :.
, :. : ""<I' ~ I, .., 140
PATRQL GVID~'
PR~NUMBER: PAGE:.
208-09
)
DESK OF1lIeEW .,
'COUNTERPART
(coatluuecJ)
3. D~p " ':~fficer to
notify Human ResourceS A'dministration,
B_, . ~ ·,Fraud. by telephone (212) 274-4749 (0830-1700 hours)
~r (i~~: .~7.i1.(at ~l other times) and State of New Yo~ Office of
the W~l ·~tqr General, by telephone (212) 417-2028 (Monday to
. Friday~ o90o~i"oo .homs) or (800) 682-4530 at all other times, whenever
a: prisoIi~~·:is.,~ .for:"
a. ING(jM,g 'GBNEMIING OFFENSE, i.e., drugs, gambling,
prt)UoJ;t, Unlicensed vendor, etc., and the prisoner possesses:
(1) .,'. ~ ofSod~ Services Recipient Identification Card OR
(2) .' Two (2) different sets ofidentification cards QB.
(3)' Food stamps
b. The telephone notification will also be made ~en prisoner is
arrested for ANY OFFENSE and possesses:
(1) Two (2) or more·social security caids in same name, with·
diff~t numbers or different names and numbers QR
(2) Department of Social Services Recipient Identification
Card and more than $500.00 in U.S. 'currency OR
(3) Department of Social Servic~ Recipient Identification
Card an~ an· employee ID card from any City agency or
other identification indicating any employment
4. Direct unifonned members of the service making any arrests to question
prisoner(s) r e t ' ."
a. Employment or involvement in the child care field in the
following capacities: . .
(1) Any employee of a day care center or Headstart Program
(2) Any family day care provider or member of household
(3) Any employee of a program for protective services.
preven~ve services, youth development and delinquency.
runaway and homeless youths, day camp, park or recreation
(4) Any employee of a foster care program or member of a
foster care family.
b. Have arresting officer prepare fonn Child Care Worker Arrest
Notification (Mise. 2148), in duplicate, when prisoner is employed
or involved in child Care field.
c. Immediately notify the Operations Unit, direct, and forward
original copy of form to New York City Department of
Investigation, in next Department mail.
(I) File duplicate copy of fonn with precinct copy of ON LINE
BOOKING ARREST WORKSHEET (PP244-159).
FORMS AND ON LiNE BOOKINo'ARREST WORKSI/EET (PD244-159)
REPORTS
NEW • YORK • CITY • I)OLlCE. • DEPARTMENT

141
·r ."
• •• , l:'.- ,~4' " ,.~. '.' ..,. ....::.;.~.::. :..:~ •••,.;• • • " '.~ ~ "
~J "," ·"·.·;;~~f't '" ..;' . .... ,:.'/. '.~
I '
.» ....... .... ,·t:. -, 'I' 'I ••• . •.;-:" .r'l j -,'< ••• • ",
.
} .. ,' . '"
. ......
"
, , " I
,. .,r ;" , .,' ~.
, 1
"
.. ' ..
"
t
", • '" ~.:: : -I --:» j. .. ".'
. .,;'
" !
.. .,~
:;
.' .:.-. t. :., ~. ..... _"•.; " ;{
'.
,,' : -:
" .". ~
" , ..•.\
"", 1. . ,: I.
" '.'
\' ".'
'. . ~
,I \ .
.. :
• ~" <,.
.,. .:"t • • '.1

.';';. ...
.. '., " .
,'" ..."
"
: ", ~ ..0'
, .;
' .. .
,.' ~
'." .~
., ~
~ .' ..
, , . ····f '.'
" , :.,'
"
, I
'."
•t
.-1 ;",
. , ..;
" '"
,1,<
NE\V • YORK • CITY • POLICE • DEPARTMENT

141
,. POLlCE, ' DEPARTMENT

%
. ,
, CERTIFICATION '.
DATE~ Ie' ~I', a.

o. H
versus
. '" .
DQCKET # '~~'-k ..~., .,
, ,
STATE'OFNEW ~RK . .
COUNTXOF::' ~"'),..~"" w~ ~~ ~c
" .
Th)s is t~ certify ('hat the enc!o'sed photocopies of:
. .. "..
. are (rue and co~piete ~opies of ~ec~rd(s.) ',ir:, 'the custqdy of th~
0' ""~ ofth'e New Yor'k·City Police Departmenl.

• . ' &
RANK'· .CO MM' AND
..... . .. .
"1
:
.~.~'\ V\"'h\.~"w-J
. NAI'vffi PRINTED .
~ .: t
.
143
EXHIBIT B - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

Trial Transcript in People v. Lopresti, Dated May 26, 2011
(pp. 143-243)
144
1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

2 BRONX COUNTY : CRIMINAL TERM : PART 21
3 --------------------------------------x
4 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
-against- IND. NO.
5 1828-2007
STEPHEN LOPRESTI,
6
Defendant(s) IRI8L
7
~-------------------------------------x
8 May 26, 2011
265 East 161st street
9 Bronx, New York
10 B E FOR E:
11 THE HONORABLE JAMES KINDLER,
12 JUS TIC E
13 (Appearances same as previously noted.)

14 LORNA BECKFORD,
senior Court Reporter
15
-----------------------------------
c::: 16
17 COURT OFFICER: Witness entering.
18 THE COURT: Officer Marshall, I remind you you ar
19 . still under oath.
20 THE WITNESS: Yes, sir.
21 THE COURT: You may continue, Mr. Epstein.
22 CROSS-EXAMINATION
23 BY MR. EPSTEIN (cont'd)
24 Q. Good morning, officer.
25 A. Good m9rning.
or _ ........ "" " ' ..... A _ ~

145
351
mm-b p.o. Marshall - People - Recross (Epstein)
1 A. With an explanation.
2 THE COURT: You've answered the question.
3 Q. When the machine printed out the result, it says
4 highest value reported, correct?

5 A.' That's because that was the hi ghest sampl e the
6 instrument was able to obtain, amount of times that your client
7 blew into the instrument.

8 Q. You don't note results of these other tests that you
·c·
-~ .",:'
10
9 never generated a report for?
A. I'm only
11 MS. KOHLMANN: Objection.
12 THE COURT: Sustained. Sustained.
13 MR. EPSTEIN: No further questions.
14 THE COURT: You may step down. You're excused.
15 (Whereupon, the witness was excused at this
16 time)
c.·.· 17 THE COURT: People may call their next witness.

18 MS. KOHLMANN: People call to the stand Patricia
19 Zippo.
20 THE COURT OFFICER: Witness entering.
21 (Whereupon, the witness enters the courtroom at
22 thi 5 time.)
'23 THE CLERK: Raise your right hand, left hand on
24 the bible.
25 PATRICIA ZIPPO, called by and on behalf of the

146
352
mm-b P.o. Marshall - People - Recross (Epstein)
1 People, having been first dUly sworn, was examined and
2 testified as follows:
3 THE CLERK: Please state your name spell it.
4 THE WITNESS: Patricia Zippo, ZIP P O.
5 THE CLERK: County of residence?
6 THE WITNESS: Bronx County.
7 THE COURT: You may examine.
8 DIRECT EXAMINATION
9 BY MS. KOHLMANN:
10 Q. Good afternoon, Miss Zippo.
11 A. Good afternoon.
12 Q. Who you do you worK for?
13 A. I work for the New York City Police Department.
14 Q. What is your job title?
15 A. I'm a criminalist.
16 Q. What is a criminalist?
c 17 A. I'm a civilian employee of the laboratory, and that is

18 my civil service title With the city of New York.
19 Q. How long have you been a criminalist?
20 A. I've been employed by the New York City Police
21 Department crime laboratory for 26 years.
22 Q. Are you a supervisor?
23 A. No. I'm technical supervisor in the intoxicated
24 driving testing unit.
25 Q. What is your educational background to hold the job of

147
353
mm-b P. Zippo - People - Direct
criminalist?
2 A. I have a bachelor's of science degree in forensic
3 science and associate's of science degree in chemistry.
4 Q. What kind of training did you need to receive to
5 become a t~chnical supervisor in the intoxicated driving testing
6 unit 1ab?
7 A. I took the NYPD five-day course at the police
8 laboratory. "I also attended Indiana University for a five-day
9 course and also had training by CMI, the manufacturer of the

c. 10 Intoxilyzer.
11 Q. How long have you had that position as technical
12 supervisor of the IDTU lab?
13 A. Since May of 2007.
14 Q. What are some of your duties and responsibilities as a
15 technical supervisor?
16 A. I go out to the field to inspect the Intoxilyzer at the
17 field sites and also to calibrate those instruments. I also at

18 times will teach the officers at the police laboratory, give the
19 refresher course or five~day course, and also provide courtroom
20 testimony.
21 Q. And we have already covered this. As an IDTU tech
22 supervisor, did you receive any specific training for that?
23 A. As I stated before, the NYPD course, the Indiana
24 University course and also training with the manufacturers,
25 CMI.
148
354
mm-b P. Zippo . People· Direct
1 Q. Approximately, how many times have you testified
2 before?
3 A. For intoxicated drivers testing unit, eight times.
4 Q. And what unit of the lab were you working in before

5 you were in the intoxicated driving testing unit?
6 A. Well I I am employed full-time by the question document
7 unit at the police lab, but I am in the intoxicated driving

8 testing unit on a needed basis for the department.
9 Q. What is the question document unit?
c:· 10 A. That unit analyzes different types of eVidence, mostly
11 handwriting analysis.
12 Q. By the way, do you kno~ if there's a handwriting test
13 that can determine if someone is intoxicated or not?
14 A. To my knowledge, no, I do not.
15 Q. How long have you been working in the question
16 documents unit?
17 A. Since December of 2003.
18 Q. When you've testified previously as an IDTU supervisor,
19 were you ever qualified as an expert?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. Approximately, how many times?
22 A. All the times that I testified.
23 Q. Were you ever denied qualifications as an expert?
24 A. No.
25 THE COURT: Sorry. How many times?
149
355
mm-b P. Zippo - People - Direct
1 THE WITNESS: Eight times, your Honor.
2 Q. And in what courts?
3 A. Here in Bronx County. Queens County and Kings County.
4 Q. And what field were you qualified in an expert as?
5 A. In breath testing.
6 a. Are you a breath test operator?
7 A. I am certified by the city of New York to be a breath
8 test operator, yes.

9 MS. KOHLMANN: Judge, I would like to mark this as
10 People's 12, JUdge, People's 12 for identification.
11 MR. EPSTEIN: Can I ·see it, please?
12 THE COURT: It will be marked and then you can see
13 it.
14 (Whereupon, the item preViously referred to is
15 received and marked People's Exhibit Number 12 for

16 identification.)
17 (Continued on the next page)
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
150
356
C mc Zippo - People - Direct (Kohlmann)
1 MR. EPSTEIN: Thank you.
2 (Exhibit handed to the witness.)

3 Q. Miss Zippo, do you know what People's 12 is?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. What is that?
6 A. It's a copy of my certification from the Department of

7 Health.
8 Q. And what are you certified to do by the Department of
9 Health?
10 A. 1 1 m certified as a breath teat operator and also as a
11 technical supervisor.
12 Q. When were you first certified?
13 A. I was first certified in January of 2007.
14 Q. How did you become certified?

15 A. By taking the instruction NYPD course at the police
16 laboratory.
c> 17 Q. And is there a test at the end of that course?
18 A. Yes.
19 Q. Did you pass the test?
20 A. Yes, I did.
21 Q. Have you had to undergo retesting to maintain your
22 certificate?
23 A. Yes, I"had to attend the refresher course.

24 Q. Have you ever failed any of the tests?
25 A. No.
151
357
C mc Zippo - People - Voir Dire (Epstein)
1 MS. KOHLMANN: Judge, I'd like to move into
2 evidence People's 12.
3 THE COURT: Any objection?
4 MR. EPSTEIN: lid like to voir dire, please?
5 THE COURT: Yes.
6 MR. EPSTEIN: Can I see the permit, please?
7 VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION

8 BY MR. EPSTEIN:
9 Q. Hi, Miss Zippo.

10 A. Hello.
11 MR. EPSTEIN: Actually, what I would like to do,
12 if you don't mind, your Honor, could 1 have this marked as
13 Defendant's Exhibit M for identification purposes?

14 THE COURT: Yes.
15 (Whereupon, the item referred to is marked
16 Defendant IS Exhibit M for identification.)
17 Q. Miss Zippo, 1 1 m showing yOU what's been marked Defense
18 Exhibit M.
19 MS. KOHLMANN: Can I see it?
20 THE COURT: Yes.
21 (Exhibit handed to Ms. Kohlmann.)
22 MS. KOHLMANN: Thank you.
24 Q. Miss Zippo, 1 1 m showing you whatls been marked as
2S Defendant's Exhibit M. Is that your CV?

152
358
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. Is that your current cv?

3 A. Yes, it is.
4 Q. You provided that to the district attorney's office,
5 right?
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. And does this CV fairly and accurately represent your
8 experience and training related to Intoxicated Driver Testing

C"';
-" 9 Unit training and your employment history?
10 A. Yes.
11 MR. EPSTEIN: Your Honor, I ask this be received
12 in evidence.
13 MS. KOHLMANN: Judge, I'm sorry, I don't
14 understand how this applies to the voir dire.
15 THE COURT: I don't see how this applies to the

16 certificate. We're just talking about the certificate.
('\
" ~,
17 MR. EPSTEIN: If you want, I'll --

18 MR. PERLMUTTER: Can we approach for a second?
19 THE COURT: I think you can reserve.
20 MR. PERLMUTTER: Can we approach for a second?
21 THE COURT: Yes.
22 (Whereupon, there was a discussion held off the
23 record, at the bench, among Court and Counsel.)
24 (Whereupon, the following takes place on the

25 record, in open court:)
153
359
1 MR. EPSTEIN: Miss Zippo, Illl actually withdraw
2 that question and reserve that for later in this
3 proceeding. Just give that back to the officer.
4 Your Honor, with respect to the exhibit the People
5 seek to introduce, other than what we just discussed at the
6 bench, which is the providing of the copy by the People, at
7 this point --
8 THE COURT: It will be received in evidence.
9 MR. EPSTEIN: Thank you. For the record I
10 withdraw the objection to the introduction of the document
11 into evidence.
12 MS. KOHLMANN: Judge, People's 12 is in evidence?
13 THE COURT: 12 is in evidence, yes.

14 MS. KOHLMANN: If we could just mark it?
15 (Whereupon, the item previously marked for
o; 16 identification is received and marked People's Exhibit

C
0'
17 Number 12 in evidence.)
18 MS.. KOHLMANN: Thank you.
19 DIRECT EXAMINATION (CONTINUED)
20 BY MS. KOHLMANN :
21 Q. As a certified breath test operator, have you ever
22 administered a breath test to anyone?
23 A. Not out in the field, only in training purposes in the

24· laboratory.
25 Q. Are you familiar with the Intoxilyzer SOOOEN?

154
360
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. What is that?
3 A. It's a breath test testing instrument that's used to
4 analyze a breath sample of a subject in order to find out the

5 alcohol content.
6 Q. Does the New York City Police Department use the
7 Intoxilyzer SOOOEN?
8 A. Yes, it does.
_......
( .' 9 .Q. Does the New York City Police Department use any other
10 type of breathalyzer machine?
11 A. Not at the field sites, no. They do use portable
12 testing out in the field, but not at the sites where they test
13 subjects.
14 Q. Have you received any training, in particular, relating
15 to the !ntoxilyzer?
16 A. Yes.
C"-~. !
17 Q. And what training was that?
18 A., Like I mentioned before with as far as the
19 Intoxilyzer itself, with the manufacturer of the Intoxilyzer,
20 CMI.
21 Q. Do you know, what is CMI?
22 A. CMI is a private company that manufacturers the
23 Intoxilyzer.
24 Q. And when was the last time you attended eMI training?
25 A. One of the eMI instructors came to the laboratory in
155
361
1 May of 2010.
2 Q. As an XDTU supervisor in the New York City Police
3 Department in what boroughs do your responsibilities cover?
4 A. All five boroughs of the City of New York.
5 Q. And how many Intoxilyzer 5000's are in use within New

6 York City?
7 A. Out in the field there are two Intoxilyzers in each
site, Manhattan has two sites.
"-" 8
C-' 9 Q. And do you know how many sites are in the Bronx?
10 A. There IS one site at the 45 Precinct.
11 Q. And there's two machines there?
12 A. Yes.
13 Q.
.
And as part of your job, have you had occasJ.on to
14 inspect and maintain the Intoxilyzer 5000 machines?
15 A. Yes, I have.
16 Q. And do you know how often those machines are inspected?
C""]
,.' 17 A. They're field inspected every five to fourteen business
18 days.
19 Q. And are you familiar with how the Intoxilyzer SOODEN
20 works?
21 A. Yes.
22 Q. And can you explain to the jury how the machine works?
23 A. A subject breathes into a breath tube, that breath
24 sample goes into a sample chamber. Depending on the amount of
25 alcohol that is in that breath sample will determine how much of
156
362
1 that infrared light goes to the photo detector which will
2 determine how much alcohol is in that breath sample.
3 MS. KOHLMANN: Judge, at this point the People
4 offer Miss Zippo as an expert in the field of Intoxicated

5 Driving Testing Unit technical supervisor.and a breath test
6 operator.
8 MR. EPSTEIN: Briefly, just some voir dire, your
C'._-> 9 Honor?
10 THE COURT: You may, yes.
12 BY MR. EPSTEIN:
'13 Q. Miss Zippo, I'm handing you back what's been marked
14 Defendant1s Exhibit M for identification, which is your CV.
16 Q. Does that CV fairly and accurately represent your
17 training and experience with respect to the field of intoxicated
18 driver testing and your relevant employment history?
19 A. Yes.
20 MR. EPSTEIN: Your Honor, I ask that be received
21 in evidence. .
23 MS. KOHLMANN: No, Judge.
24 THE COURT: That's received.
157
363
C~ Zippo - People - Voir Dire (Epstein)
1 identification is received and marked Defendant's Exhibit M
2 in evidence.)
3 Q. . Now you testified just before that you had been
4 qualified as an expert eight different times in court, right?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. And in those times that you testified as an expert, how
7 many times have you testified with respect to the concept called
8 insufficient sample?
0 9 A. I don't recall exactly how many times. I know the last
10 time I was in court here in Bronx County I testified to
11 insufficient sample.
12 Q. And that was in a case, People versus DelaCruz,

13 correct?
14 A. I don't recall the defendant's name, but it was the

15 last time I was here in the Bronx County.
16 Q. Was that September of 2010?
0 ~
17 A. Yes, that's correct.
18 THE COURT: What date?
19 MR. EPSTEIN: September of 2010.
20 Q. Other than that, that case, do you recall ever
21 testifying wit~ respect to insufficient sample?

22 A. I don't recall at this time. I don't remember.
23 Q. With respect to your training and experience I have
24 some questions for you. I notice that the only employment
25 history on your CV is from the New York Police Department. Is

158
364
C me Zippo - People - Voir Dire (Epstein)
1 there any other relevant employment experience that you have
2 other than with the police department?

3 A. No, I have peen with the police department for
4 twenty-six years.
5 Q. And from 1985 to 1998, you were in serology?
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. That's the study of blood and other bodily fluids?
8 A. For identification of bodily fluids.
9 Q. That didn't involve any concept of breath testing?
10 A. No.
11 Q. And in this case you have ·no opinion with respect to a
12 blood sample because you're aware there was no blood sample that
13 was collected here?
14 A. I'm not aware that any bl~od sample was collected, nor
15 do I have any experience with blood testing in that respect.
c.) 16
17
Q. Now from 1998 to 2003, I guess, when you left serology,
you went to the Latent Print Unit?
18 A. Yes, the Serology Unit of-the police lab was disbanded
19 and I went to the Latent Print Development Unit.
20 Q. What does the Latent Print Unit involve?
21 A. Analyzing different types of evidence in order to
22 identify and compare latent prints.
23 Q. There is no breath testing involved there?
24 A. That1s correct.
25 Q. So your first experience -- well, Ilm sorry, in 2003,
159
365
1 you were transferred to the Document Unit?
2 A. That's correct.
3 Q. And that's where you dealt with handwriting?
5 Q. The district attorney asked you a question about

6 whether there was ever any handwriting test that you determine
7 intoxication, you remember that question being asked?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. You do have some training and experience with the

10 effects of alcohol on the human body, right?
11 A. Yes.
12 Q. And that was your CMI training, you received some of

13 that?
14 A. That, and also Indiana University.
15 Q. At the Borkenstein' Unit?
c:) 16
17
A.
Q.
That1s correct.
SO you're aware then alcohol can affect both gross .
18 motor skills and fine motor skills, correct?

19 A. Yes.
20 Q. Are you also aware that fine motor skills will go
21 before gross motor skills when a 'person is under the influence of
22 alcohol?
23 A. Yes.
24 Q. Would you agree that handwriting is an example of a

25 fine motor skill?
160
366
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. SO would you also agree that --
3 THE COURT: I take it w~'re probably beyond the
4 voir dire.
5 MR. EPSTEIN: 1 1 11 return to that on cross.
6 Q. You were assigned to the IDTU unit in October of 2006,
7 initially?
8 A. Yes.
C: 9 Q. SO that's the first time you had any dealings with
10 breath samples?
12 Q. And then you received training from them in January of
13 2007, formal training?
14 A. Yes.
15 Q. That was the forty hour course, the five day course
16 that you were speaking about?
C..·: 17 A. Yes.
18 Q. That training started after the test that took place in
19 this case, right, which was December of 2006?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. And you weren't involved in any of the testing
22 procedures that took place in this case, of course, right?
23 A. No, I was not.
24 Q. Your education is from the University of New Haven,

25 right?
161
367
1 A. Correct.
2 Q. That's where you received your B.S.?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. Did you do any graduate studies?
5 A. No.
G Q. Have you ever been published?
7 A. No.
B Q. Have you ever lectured or presented anything at any
9 seminars on breath testing?
10 A. No. On breath testing, no.
11 Q. When you went to eMI training, that CM! training was
12 only available to law enforcement? When you were there, it was
13 just law enforcement officers?
14 A. Well, it was at the police laboratory.
15 Q. Right, they came to you?

They came to us, yes.
C",'
16 A.
."
17 Q. eM!.
18 Are you aware that -- that was the forty hour course?
19 A. Well, it was four different courses that CM! offered

20 us, some of them were three days. I would say most of them were
21 three day courses.
22 Q. Have you ever attended their comprehensive breath
23 alcohol tech course in Kentucky?
24 A. No, I have not.
25 MR. EPSTEIN: Your Honor, may we approach briefly

162
368
1 because there's one other issue I need to pursue if ,the
2 People are going to address it?
3 THE COURT: Yes.

5 record, at the bench, among court and Counsel.)
7 record, in open oourt:)
8 Q. You testified that you never oollected any evidentiary
c 9 samples, is that correct?

11 Q. So every test that you have ever done has been in what
12 I call a controlled environment, correct?
13 A. Yes.
14 Q. So you've never had an actual motorist blow
15 insufficient sample into a machine?
C~; 17 Now as part of your training, either with the New York
I Q.
18 City Police Department or with CMI, was the topic of insufficient
19 sample discussed?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. So you're aware that there's a sample chamber inside of
22 the Intoxilyzer SOOOEN, correct?
23 A. Yes.
24 Q. Do you know what the size of that sample chamber is?
2S A. Off the top of my head, I don't recall the actual sizer

163
369
C mc Zippo - People - Voir Dire (Bpstein)
1 no.
2 Q. Is it approximately 28.9 centimeters?
3 A. I don't recall.
4 Q. The sample chamber is the device that the lung air is
5 stored in during the time period that the infrared energy source
6 emits a wave of energy to the photo detector, correct?
7 A. That's where the breath sample is analyzed, yes.
8 Q. What is the size of that sample chamber?
9 A. Again, off the top of my head, I don't recall the
10 actual size.
11 Q. Specifically, with respect to a sufficient sample,
12 what's the quantity of lung air that needs to be captured by the
13 sample chamber for it to be a sufficient sample reading?
14 A. Well, the instrument itself has to meet, you know, four
15 certain criteria. As far as volume, it's 1.1 liters of air.
c; 16
17
Q. So 1.1 Liters is the minimum amount that is required
for a sample to be put into the machine to give a sufficient

18 sample?
19 A. For a sufficient sample, yes.

20 Q. And you yourself, any test that you have done on
21 insufficient sample was a controlled environment test during
22 calibrations, correct?
23 A. Yes.
24 Q. You do calibration tests on the machine where you make
25 sure that the insufficient sample reading is working correctly?

164
370
2 Q. What are those four criteria that are required by the
3 machine?
4 A. Again, the volume, as far as the flow rate of air that
5 is going into the instrument. Then as far as the slope is
6 concerned. You don't want a sudden rise in the alcohol content,
7 otherwise the instrument will deem it and will flag it an invalid

sample. And of course, time, it has to be given a certain amount
c 8
9 of time, the breath sample, usually six to eight minutes would be
10 the minimum.
11 Q. The flow rate that you were talking about, that's
12 detected by a flow sensor, correct?

13 A. I believe BO, yes.
14 Q. Do you know if that flow sensor is ever calibrated by
15 the New York Police Department?

A. To my knowledge I never calibrated that in the
c~
16
17 instrument.
18 MR. EPSTEIN: Your Honor, based upon what the
19 People have requested, I have no objection, but I reserve my
20 right to make any objections during the course of the
21 testimony, but with respect to the field she's been
22 qualified in, she's clearly a breath tech supervisor.
23 THE COURT: The witness is qualified in the area
24 of technical supervision of the IDTU operation, and breath

25 test operation.
165
371
1 MR. EPSTEIN; And I have no objection to that,
2 THE COURT: Ladies and gentlemen, when I qualify
3 an expert, that just means I'm going to allow her to give an
4 opinion in that area. Ultimately, the qualifications of the
5 expert and the weight to be given her testimony is up to the
6 jury.
7 You may continue.
8 MS. KOHLMANN: Thank you, Judge.
10 BY MS. KOHLMANN:
11 Q. How do you give someone an Intoxilyzer test?
12 A. As far as at a site, how would an officer give someone
13 a test?
14 Q. Yes?
15 A. Is that what you're asking?
C::: 16 There's a twenty minute deprivation period that the

17 officer has to watch a subject to insure that the subject doesn't
18 put anything in his or her mouth, doesn't belch, and so forth and
19 so on. Also, at that time, coordination tests can be employed.
20 And then as far as a sample going into the instrument, the
21 officer will prompt the instrument to start the test. It goes
22 through a series of self-checks and the officer is prompted by
23 the instrument to have the subject blow into the instrument. A
24 mouthpiece is put onto the breath tube and the subject is asked
25 to blow into that mouthpiece into the breath tube. After that,
166
372
1 that breath sample enters the breath tube, it then enters the
2 sample chamber where it is analyzed with infrared technology.
3 Q. And the infrared techn~logy that you talked about, do
4 you know how that works inside the machine?

5 A. Yes, I do. There's a filter wheel inside the
6 instrument that detects the amount of alcohol that is sent to the
7 photo detector, and depending on the amount of alcohol that is in
c 8
9
that breath sample and the amount of light that reaches that
photo detector will determine the alcohol content.
10 Q. And are these machines, the Intoxilyzer 5000's
11 calibrated?
12 A. Yes, they are.

13 Q. What is a calibration test?
14 A. A calibration test that we perform at the NYPD and out
15 in the field at these locations is done every six months and we

16 test the instrument for its accuracy, running a series of cal.
17 checks with the simulator solution that is attached to the
1B instrument, making sure that the instrument is functioning
19 properly within the range. We also blow different interference
20 to make sure that the instrument is recognizing those
21 interferences.
22 Q. Have you ever conducted these tests?
23 A. Yes.
24 Q. And what is the purpose of calibrating the

25 Intoxilyzer?
167
373
C me Zippo - People - Direct (Kohlmann)
1 A. To insure that instrument is working properly.
2 Q. Is there any paperwork generated as a result of these
3 calibration tests?
4 A. Yes. Whether we employ them at th~ laboratory or out
5 in the field, we take handwritten notes, and then we also prepare
6 a cover sheet that states that we did in fact calibrate that
7 instrument on that particular date.

S MS. KOHLMANN: Judge, I'd 1 ike to mark this
9 four-page document as People's 13 for identification.
10 THE COURT: People's 13.
12 People's Exhibit Number 13 for identification.)
13 (Exhibit handed to defense attorneys.)
14 MS. KOHLMANN: If you could hand it to the
15 witness, Officer? Thank you.

(:
17 Q. Miss Zippo, I'm handing you People's 13. Do you know
18 what that is?
19 A. Yes, it's four pages of copies of calibration that was
20 performed.
21 Q. And what machine was calibrated, what is the serial
22 number?
23 A. Reading 68 dash 013401.
24 Q. And how do you know that those are calibration reports?
25 A. Because on the top of this cover sheet it says it's a

168
374
1 certified photostatic copy of the certificate of calibration.

2 The second sheet is a record of the handwritten notes of the
3 calibration performed and that instrument number and the two
4 readouts from the instrument have the serial number of that
5 instrument and the date that the calibration was conducted.
6 Q. And have you yourself generated calibration reports
7 like these?
8 A. Yes.
0 9 Q. Who specifically did this calibration report?
10 A. Well, the cover sheet is signed by technical supervisor

11 Anna Guzowski, but the actual calibration was performed by
12 technical supervisor Gamil Hanna.

13 Q. Do you know who Gamil Hanna is?
14 A. Yes.
15 Q, Does he still work with the lab?
16 A. No, he is retired.
()
17 Q. And are these records of calibration reports kept in
18 the ordinary course of business of the New York City Police
19 Department?
21 Q. Is it the ordinary course of business of the New York
22 City Police Department to make and maintain such records?
23 A. Yes.
24 Q. Are the events recorded in that document recorded on or
25 about the day that they happen?

169
375
Zippo - People - Voir Dire (Epstein)
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. And was Gamil Hanna the technical supervisor who did
3 the report under a business obligation at that time to do so?
4 A. Yes.
5 MS. KOHLMANN: Judge / I now seek to move into

6 evidence People's 13 based on the witness' answers/ and it
7 is a certified document, under Section CPLR 4518.
9 MR. EPSTEIN: Briefly/ your Honor?

11 BY MR. EPSTEIN:
12 Q. Miss Zippo, you said that these tests were done by
13 Gamil Hanna, is that correct?

14 A. Yes.
15 Q. You weren1t obviously present when he did these tests?

16 A. Not that I recall/ no.
17 Q. But you have done similar tests like it?

18 A. Yes.
19 Q. So on the second page where it says Record of
20 Intoxilyzer Calibration, I notice there are handwritten notes,
21 for example, it says, "RFI, okay?1I
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. And it also says, "Invalid sample, okay?"
24 A. Yes.
25 Q. IIInsufficient sample, okay?"

170
376
Zippo - People - Voir Dire (Epstein)
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. If you look at the next page, there's a printout. That
3 printout is generated from the Intoxilyzer 5000 1 isn't it?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. Isn't it true that when you do the record of
6 calibration l the machine also prints out the results of these
7 other tests, that the Intoxilyzer 5000 also prints out similar
printouts for each of these calibration tests that you run?

c
8
9 A. Yes, they do.
10 Q. Do you have those for this --
11 A. No, I do not.
12 Q. date?
13 MR. EPSTEIN: Your Honor l I would ask that the
14 complete set be marked as opposed to just --
15 THE COURT: The others have been provided?
c 16
17
MS. KEARY:
MR. EPSTEIN:
Yes.
I ask they be joined as one exhibit.

18 THE COURT: You can put them in if you want.
19 MR. EPSTEIN: My objection to this, it's
20 incomplete.
21 THE COURT: I'll take it. You can'put that in.
22 If you have the rest of it, you can put it in.
23 Received in evidence.
25 identification is received and marked People's Exhibit

171
377
Zippo - People - Direct (Kohlmann)
1 Number 13 in evidence.)
3 BY MS. KOHLMANN:
4 Q. Miss Zippo, I wanted to ask you, what is the simulator
5 solution lot number on that calibration report?
6 A. That is 06030.
7 Q. And what is the date of that calibration report?
8 A. November 14, 2006.

9 Q. What does that calibration report indicate to you?
10 A. That the instrument was working properly.
11 Q. Were there any problems with the machine on
12 November 14, 2006?

13 MR. PERLMUTTER: Objection.
14 THE COURT: Overruled.
15 A. From looking at the documents, no.
.c· "
..... /
16 Q. Are either -- are there any other tests, besides
17 ,calibration tests, that are performed on the Intoxilyzers?
18 A. We also perform field inspection tests on each
19 instrument out in the field.
20 Q. And what's the difference between the calibration test
21 and the field tests?
22 A. Well, with respect to the field inspection, that's
23 conducted every five to fourteen days out in the field and
24 there's a series of three cal. checks that are performed, but
25 with the actual calibration, which is done every six months,

172
378
Zippo - People - Direct (Kohlmann)
1 there's more in-depth testing done in order to make sure that the
2 instrument recognizes the interference and the other features on
3 the instrument.
4 Q. And have you yourself conducted field tests?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. And in addition to what you just explained about field

7 tests, is there anything else that is done during the field tests
8 or did we get it all?
9 A. Of course, when we go and inspect the site, we look at

10 the actual site itself to make sure there's no debris around the
11 instruments, we check the breath hose; we also run a diagnostic,
12 as the calibration tests also do the same.
13 Q. And is there any paperwork generated as a result of a
14 field inspection test?
15 A. Yes.
16 MS. KOHLMANN: Judge, I'd like to mark for
C~:;
17 identification People's 14, it's a four-page document.
19 People's Exhibit Number 14 for identification.)
20 CONTINUED NEXT PAGE .
21
22
23
24
25
173
( ) Zippo-Peo-Direct(Kohlmann) 379
2 BY MS. KOHLMANN (cont'd):
3 Q. Ms. zippo, I am going to bore you with a few more
4 questions about these documents.
5 You know what this is, people's 147
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. what is it?
8 A. These are copies of a field inspection that was
9 conducted on an Intoxilyzer.
10 Q. And what is the serial number for the Intoxilyzer that
11 was inspected?
12 A. 68-013401.
13 Q. Is that the same machine as the calibration reports
14 that we just talked about in people's 13?
15 A. Yes.
c> 16
17
Q.
A.
And who was it that did that field test?
Technical supervisor Gam;l Hanna.
18 Q. And he is retired?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. Are those records are kept in the ordinary course of
21 the business of the N.Y.P.D.?
23 Q. Is it the ordinary course of business of the New York
I 24 police Department to make and maintain such records?
25 A. Yes.
174
1 Q. Are the events recorded in that field test recorded on
2 or about the date that they happened?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. And when Mr. Hanna made that record, was he under a
5 business obligation to do so?
6 A. Yes.
8 evidence people's 14, based on the witness answers. It is
9 a certified document under C.P.L.R. Section 4518.
10 THE COURT: No objection.
11 MR. PERLMUTTER: NO objection.
12 THE COURT: proceed to mark it in evidence.

13 COURT OFFICER: people's 14 so marked in
14 evidence.
15 Q. What date was that field test conducted?
',
C.... ~ 16 A. On December I, 2006 .
17 Q. And what was the simulator solution lot number on that
18 field test?
19 A. 06040.
20 Q. And what were the results of that field test?
21 A. With respect to the calibration checks or would you
22 like me to give those readings?
23 Q. With respect to the field test. I am sorry.
24 A. There was also a through cal check that was performed
25 during the field test. would you like those readings?
175
1 Q. Yes, thank you.
2 MR. EPSTEIN: objection. It speaks for itself.
3 THE COURT: overruled.
4 A. The reading is .101, .102, .102 .

5 Q. And what do these readings tell you?
6 A. That the instrument was in proper working order.
7 Q. And what are those readings of?
8 A. Of the cal check that was performed at that field
9 inspection on that day.
10 Q. And what is a cal check designed to check?
11 A. It's designed to check the Intoxilyzer to make sure
12 that it's functioning within the range of that simulator
13 solution that's attached to it. It's a reference solution at
14 .10 percent content ethanol alcohol, and we are .ensuring that
15 the instrument ;s reading it correctly.
c 16
17
Q. Does the New York city police Department create that
simulator solution?
18 A. NOt we do not create that. It's manufactured by a
19 private company and tested by the State of New York.
20 Q. And then you receive it and use it to check the
21 Intoxilyzers?
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. And how is the simulator solution identified?
; 24 A.They are given a lot number.
25 Q. Why are they given a specific number?
176
1 A. when are they?
2 Q. where are they?
3 A. There is also an expiration date that's with the
4 simulator solution, so that they could be put out into the
5 field. And they are given a lot number, so we can keep track 0
6 that lot number and what we are using in our testing methods.
7 Q. Is there anything that the cal check on December 1,
8 2006, indicates to you about the machine?
('
9 A. well, along with the cal check, technical supervisor
10 Hanna also noted that the diagnostic test was okay, the breath
11 hose was heated, and the printer check was okay.
12 Q. Was the breath hose supposed to be heated?
13 A. Yes.
14 Q. And referring to the remarks section of the field
15 report on December 1, 2006, what does that tell you?
c 16 A. Well, there are no handwritten notes. There is no
17 remarks written, whatsoever.
18 Q. Does it indicate to you if the machine was working
19 properly or not?
20 MR. EPSTEIN: objection, Your Honor.
~21 speculation.
22 THE COURT: overruled.
23 A. well, looking at what the cal check results were, and
24 the indication of all the diagnostic testing, the breath hose
25 heated and printer check being okay, it was functioning
177
1 properly.
2 Q. can you tell if there were any problems with the
3 Intoxilyzer with that specific serial number that you
4 referenced? Were there any problems with that machine on
5 December 1, 2006?
6 A. No, because he would have noted something in the
7 remarks.
MS. KOHLMANN: Judge. I have more documents.
c 8
9 THE COURT: This;s a good time to break.

10 All right, ladies and gentlemen, we are going to
11 take a lunch break.
12 Keep an open mind. Do not discuss the case
13 amongst yourselves or with anyone else. obviously, don't
14 supply any information about the trial. Report to me if
15 anyone should improperly try to influence you. Do not vie
16 or visit the place where the alleged crime was allegedly
17 committed. And above all, do not read, view or listen to
18 any accounts or discussion ~f the case reported in any
19 media. DO not do any research.
20 Have a good lunch. We will be back by 2:15.
21 COURT OFFICER: Jury exiting.
22 (whereupon, the Jury exits the courtroom.)
23 THE COURT: All right 2:15.
24 L UNC H RE C E S 5 S
25 * * *
178
1 AFT ERN 0 0 N S E S S ION
2 (Whereupon, the following takes place in open
3 court, on the record, in the presence of Court, counsel,
4 and the defendant, out of the presence of the jury:)
5 COURT CLERK: people versus stephen Lopresti,
6 case on trial continues. All parties present.
7 THE COURT: There is one matter I need to bring
B up concerning the promises made to the two officers who
c 9 testified. My understanding of the testimony was that, an
10 the representation was that officer Goris had been offered
11 immunity provided that she testified truthfully -- there
12 was a proviso -- whereas, officer Marshall was simply
13 promised immunity. That's my understanding.
14 The reason I bring this up is I had an in camera
15 conversation, as you both know, with paul London who
c 16 represents both officers. And without revealing the nature
17 of his conversations, in his view, both officers were
18 offered exactly the same proposition .. In other words,
19 there was no distinction. I am not saying it significant,
20 but it seems to me there was some difference. I am just
21 informing the parties of that. In his view, it was the
22 same proposition offered to each.
23 MR. EPSTEIN: Your Honor, there is one other
24 thing relate to a similar topic. The defendant is going to
25 request that the Court take judicial notice of Penal Law
179
1 Section 200.20, so that I can make comments on it in

2 summation. It was part of the issue as to credibility.
3 THE COURT: We can take that up at the
4 appropriate time. I thought I had to tell the jury why

5 they are hearing all this testimony about ticket fixing,
6 which would be just to say that the reason this is being
7 introduced is for their guidance because they can consider
8 it as evidence during the deliberations to evaluate the
9 truthfulness of the testimony of the witnesses. And, then,
10 I will be instructing them further on the other factors to
11 be considered in the case. They may not understand.
rr Other than that, are we ready to proceed?
13 MS. KOHLMANN: Yes.
14 MR. PERLMUTTE~: Yes.
15 THE COURT: IS the witness available?
16 MS. KOHLMANN: Yes. she is outside.
17 * * * *
18 (Whereupon, the following takes place in open
19 court, on the record, in the presence of (ourt, counsel,
20 the Jury and the defendant:)
21 COURT OFFICER: Jurors entering.
22 (Whereupon, the Jury enters the courtroom.)
23 THE COURT: You may be seated. Good afternoon.
24 Ladies and gentlemen.
2S THE JURY: Good afternoon.
180
1 THE COURT: Let me begin just by giving you a

2 brief instruction just for your guidance as to why you are
3 hearing some of these evidence you have heard concerning

4 the so-called fixing of traffic summonses and a related
5 investigation, just so you will have some guidance as to
6- why this evidence was admitted.
7 The evidence is being admitted because the jury
may consider this evidence during deliberations. You may
C-··'·
8
.<
9 evaluate the truthfulness of the testimony of the witnesses
10 involved. And I am going to give you further instructions
11 on this, and various other factors you may consider in
12 evaluating the credibility of witnesses at the conclusion
13 of the case when I give the jury my instructions on the
14 law.
15 with that, weill bring the witness back.
C> 16 COURT OFFICER: Witness entering.

17 THE COURT: Ms. zippo, I remind you you are still
18 under oath.
19 THE WITNESS: Yes, Your Honor.
20 THE COURT: You may continue.
21 MS. KOHLMANN: Thank you, Judge.
22 Q. Ms. zippo, I'd like to hand back to you people's 13
23 in evidence, which is a four-page document. And I also hand up
24 to you an additional three pages which, Judge, I'd like to make
25 it part of the exhibit. should it be marked separately?
181
( ) Zippo-Peo-Direct{Kohlmann) 387
1 THE COURT: why don't you put it all together.
2 This is what, people's -- this is people's 15?

3 MS. KOHLMANN: It's 13
4 (Document shown to counsel.)
5 THE COURT: 13 has been moved into evidence. So,
6 whatever is in evidence is in evidence.
7 MR. PERLMUTTER: There are six additional pages.
8 THE COURT: whatever additional -- it's already
9 admitted.
10 MS. KOHLMANN: Judge, rather than have confusion,
11 I can do it a separate exhibit.
12 THE COURT: Come on up.
14 record at the bench among the prosecutor, defense counsel
15 and the court.)
C~: 16 MS. KOHLMANN: Judge, I'll leave people's 13 as
17 is. I am seeking to mark for identification a six-page
18 packet as people's 15 for identification.
19 COURT OFFICER: people's 15 so marked for
20' identification.
21 Q. Ms. Zippo, I am handing you back people's 13 in
22 evidence, the calibration report that we talked about before
23 lunch, and I have handed you people's 15 for identification.
24 Can you take a look at people's 15. And do you
2S know what that is?
182
( ) Zippo-Peo-Direct{Kohlmann) 388
1 A. Yes. This is the other pages that were generated at
2 the time of calibration of this particular instrument.
3 Q. And do those relate to people's 13?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. Were those done on the same day?
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. And under the same conditions that we talked about
8 earlier before lunch?
9 A. Yes.
11 evidence people's 15.
13 MR. EPSTEIN: No.
14 THE COURT: It is received in evidence.
16 evidence.
17 Q. And before we broke for lunch, we were talking about
18 simulator solution.
19 I'd like to hand you people's 14 in evidence. And can
20 you just tell the jury what was the simulator solution lot
21 number that was used in the field test on December I, 2006?
22 A. 06040.
23 MS. KOHLMANN: Judge, I'd like to mark for
24 identification a two-page document as people's 16.
183
( ) zippo-Peo-Direct(Kohlmann) 389
1 ide~tification.
2 Q. Do you know what that is, people's 16?

3 A. Yes. It's a copy of the simulator solution lot number
4 06040, a certificate of Analysis.
5 Q. And are you familiar with that certificate of Analysis.
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. What does -- I am sorry. what does that certificate 0
8 Analysis tell you about the simulator solutions?

9 A. It says that it was tested by the New York State
10 police, what the results were, and what the expiration date was
11 of that lot number.
13 evidence People's 16 under C.P.L.R. section 45187
14 MR. EPSTEIN: May I inquire, briefly, Your Honor
15 THE COURT: Yes.
c=~ 16 VOIR DIRE
17 BY MR. EPSTEIN:
18 Q. Ms. zippo, People's 16, which ;s the Certificate of
19 Analysis of the breath alcohol simulator solution, relates to
20 some work that was done to determine the r~liability of lot
21 06040, correct?
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. And that solution was supplied by Stiefel Research
24 institute, S-T-I-E-F-E-L.
25 A. Yes.
184
1 Q. And that solution was tested using headspace gas
2 chromatography, right?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. That's not the method of analysis that is involved in
5 the testing of the breath s~mple in this case?
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. The method of analysis of the Intoxilyzer is the
8 infrared spectrography?
9 A. It was based on infrared technology, yes.
10 Q. The question I have for you is this: The certificate
11 says that these testing procedures that were done using
12 headspace gas chromatography resulted in some sort of data.
13 ·I am assuming -- are you familiar with chromagraphs or
14 headspace gas chromatography?
15 A. Not so much. I have never done that test"j ng in the
C· 16 laboratory.
17 Q. Have you reviewed the chromagraphs that were done by
18 the State in relation to the testing of this simulator solution?
19 A. No.
20 Q. Are you aware that the District Attorney's
21 office has those? Have they supplied them to you yet?
22 A. I am not aware of that, and no.
23 Q. You donlt have any knowledge about the actual test that!
24 was done by the State in this case?
25 A. That's correct. I
I
185
( ) Zippo-Peo-Direct(Kohlrnann) 391
1 MR. EPSTEIN: No objection, Judge.
2 THE COURT: Then it is received in evidence.
3 (Whereupon, people's Exhibit Number 16 was
4 received and marked in evidence.)

5 COURT OFFICER: people Exhibit 16 so marked in
6 evidence.
8 BY MS. KOHLMANN (cont'd):
o 9 MS. KOHLMANN: We now have a four-page document
10 that I'd like to mark for identification as people's 17,
11 Your Honor.
12 (whereupon, people's Exhibit Number 17 was marke
13 for identification.)
14 COURT OFFICER: people's 17 so marked four I.D.
15 Q. Ms. zippo, do you know what people's 17 is?
o 16 A. Yes. It's the paperwork that was used for field

17 inspec~ion on December 11, 2006.
18 Q. And;s that on the same Intoxilyzer that we have been
19 talking about before lunch, number 68-013401?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. And are those records kep~ in the ordinary course of
22 business of the New York city police Department?
23 A. Yes.
24 Q. And is it the ordinary course of business for the New
2S york City police Department to make and maintain those field
186
1 test records?
2 A. Yes.
3 Q. And, again, who made that report?
4 A. The field inspection was conducted by technical
5 supervisor Gam;l Hanna.
6 Q. And when he made that report, was he under a business
7 obligation to do so?
8 A. Yes.
( '
/
I
9 Q. And are the events recorded in that document recorded

10 on or about the date that it happened?
11 A. Yes.
12 MS. KOHLMANN: Judge, r'd like to move into
13 evidence People's 17.
14 MR. EPSTEIN: objection. May I be heard at
15 side-bar.
c 16 THE COURT: Yes.
17 * * *
18 (Whereupon, the following takes place at the sid
19 bar:)
20 MR. EPSTEIN: This concerns a report that was
21 done on a date subsequent to the December 6 of 2006. So,
22 that's irrelevant with respect to this particular case.
23 Any testing that was done on the equipment after 2006
24 doesn't bear on any issue in this case.
2S MS. KOHLMANN: Judge, it'S testing that's done,
187
1 field inspection test. It's the same as the other field

2 inspection test that the people put into evidence. The
3 first one was done the date of December 1, and this one was
4 the date of December 11.
5 THE COURT: This is after the test?
6 MS. KOHLMANN: Yes, but the people move this in
7 to show that the machine was still working and operating
oo, 8 just fine after the test, and that this is not a
C-, ..
,
9 problematic machine.
10 MS. KEARY: I think it's proper in the area where
11 one of the main defense is they are attacking the
12 reliability of the instrument.
13 MR. EPSTEIN: That's a gross misstatement. The
14 uncontroverted testimony--
15 THE COURT: wouldn't it be relevant to show if
c::- 16 it's accurate before and it's accurate after, it's accurat
17 in the interim? It's relevant evidence.
18 MR. EPSTEIN: Whether it was operating before or
19 a date subsequent is not relevant, if they had a testing
20 that was done that day. obviously, the air blank and the
21 simulator check, the cal check that was done that day,
22 that's admitted, that's in evidence. The testing that's
23 done before, that's admitted, that's in evidence. But
24 anything that was done afterwards is not relevant.
25 THE COURT; what's relevant for them to show is
188
1 that the machine is operable on a particular day.
2 MR. EPSTEIN: This;s subsequent to that.
3 THE COURT: But it seems to be relevant to show
4 it'S done before and then after, which would imply it's
5 continuous.
6 The objection is overruled.
7 MR. EPSTEIN: what I will do, if I may, I believe
8 there is also some case law on point. I will bring it to
9 your attention. We can always try to address this again,
10 depending on where it goes.
11 THE COURT: The objection is overruled.
12 *
13 (whereupon, the following takes place in open
14 court, on the record, in the presence of court, counsel,
15 the Jury and the defendant:)
16 THE COURT: people's 17 admitted in evidence.
20 evidence.
21 Q. What does People's 17, the field test done on December
22 7 -- I am sorry. what date was' that fi eld test done on?
23 A. December 11, 2006.
24 Q. What does that field test tell you about the
2S Intoxilyzer on December 11, 2006?
189
( ) Zippo-Peo-Direct (Kohlmann) 395,
1 A. He indicated on his handwritten note that the

2 instrument was in proper working condition.
3 Q. Are there any printout also attached to that?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. what'do the printout indicate to you?
6 A~ That all the diagnostic tests passed, and that the cal
7 check were within the range.
8 Q. Is there any indication to you that the machine was no
(','
9 working properly on December 11, 20061
10 A. No.
11 Q. And what was the simulator solution lot number used on
12 that day?
13 A. 06040.
14 MS. KOHLMANN: . Judge, I'd 1ike to mark for
15 identification a two-page document as people's 18.
c:.': 16 (Whereupon, People's Exhibit Number 18 was marked
17 for identification.)
19 identification.
20 Q. MS. zippo, before I ask you about people's 18, I'd lik
21 you to take a look at people's 13, again. Do youst;ll have it

22 up there?
23 A. Yes.
24 Q. Can you tell the jury the simulator solution lot numbe
2S that was used in the calibration report in people's 13?
.... ,......,........ .,'P.!I"......... .! - - "' ..... ..... _ _ --_.I.- - -

190
1 A. That was' 06030.

2 Q. Thank you.
3 And as' to people's 18, do you know what that is?
4 A. Yes. It's a copy of the Certificate of Analysis for
5 lot number 06030, simulator solution.
6 Q. Is that the same as people's 16 except for a different
7 orqer of simulator solution?
8 A. Yes.
10 evidence People's 18 under C.P.L.R. section 4518.
12 MR. EPSTEIN: Briefly, your Honor, voir dire.
13 VOIR DIRE
14 BY MR. EPSTEIN:
15 Q. Ms. zippo, I am going to ask you the same questions I
C.: 16 asked concerning the other simulator solution.
17 Are you aware that the checks done on the simulator
18 involved headspace gas chromatography?
19 A. Just from what I can read on the actual certificate of
20 Analysis.
21 Q. Your own knowledge about this test ;s based upon the
22 reading of that piece of paper?
24 Q. Are you aware that people have the actual chromograph
25 of the testing that was done on that solution?
I
191
( ) Zippo-Peo-Direct(Kohlrnann) 397
1 A. No.
2 Q. You haven't seen those, right?
3 A. No.
4 Q. And the t~st that was done in this case involved
5 infared spectrograph?
6 A. which test?
7 Q. The Intoxilyzer SOOOEN involved infrared spectrography
8 in its analysis?
9 A. Yes.
10 MR. EPSTEIN: No objection.
11 THE COURT: Received in evidence.
15 evidence.
C".:- 16 DIRECT ExAMINATION
17 BY MS. KOHLMANN:
18 Q. MS. zippo, good news. We are done with paperwork. I'd
19 like to ask you some questions about this case.
20 Have you viewed a videotape of a test, of an Intoxilyze
21 test in this case? It's People's 3 in evidence.
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. And you saw tha~ before you came to court today?
24 A. Yes.
25 Q. And with reference to that breath test, was that breath
192
1 test performed correctly?

2 MR. EPSTEIN: objection.
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. And are you familiar with the procedures on how to
6 perform a breath test?

7 A. Yes.
8 Q. And I'd like to show you people's 11 that's already in
9 evidence, the results of that breath test.
10 what does people's 11 tell you about the machine's
11 functionality on December 5, 2006?
12 A. Well, according to this test, the c?l check was within
13 range.
14 Q. sO, was there anything that makes you think that the
15 machine was not working properly?
c.' 16 A. No.
17 Q. And when you watch the videotape that's in evidence in
18 this case, how could you tell that the Intoxilyzer breath test
19 performed on the defendant was performed properly?
20 A. well, I observed, you know, the officer started the
21 test and instructed the subject to blow into the breath hose.
22 The first time it did time out.
23 Q. What does that mean.
24 A. They are allotted the time of three minutes on that
2S instrument for a subject to blow in a breath sample. It did
193
( ) ZippO-PeO-Direct(Kohlmann) 399
1 time out. So, the officer asked the subject if he wanted to
2 take another test. So, then the instrument was reset and
3 another test was started.
4 Q. Does that resetting affect the next test in any way?
5 A. NO. And the instrument has to go through a series of
6 checks as far as the diagnostics are concerned, and then go to
7 the air blank, a cal check, another air blank, and then the
8 subject is asked to please provide a sample.
9 Q. Now, on the video, did you see the defendant blow at
10 the breath tube some maybe one or two feet away from it, blowin
11 at it? Did you see that happen on the video?
12 A. Yes.
13 Q. Can you obtain a sample that way?
14 A. No.
15 Q. Did you see the defendant actually then put his mouth
c=: 16 onto the breath tube and put air into the machine?
17 A. Well, not onto the breath tube, onto the mouthpiece.
18 Q. I am sorry, onto the mouthpiece.
19 And on the video, did you see the defendant blowing ai
20 into the tube or sucking it out of the tube, or both?
21 A. I saw both.
22 Q. And the defendant sucking air in and blowing air out,
23 does that affect the test?
24 A. well, in that time period, as long as there 1S some
25 sample or a minimum amount of sample given into that breath
194
1 tube, then the instrument can analyze it. And it did, in fact,
2 come out insufficient sample because sufficient amount of breath
3 was not introduced into the instrument.
4 Q. Does insufficient sample mean invalid sample?
."""'... ........-~~ ~"..-. .,..........
,
5 A. NO.
6 Q. What does insufficient sample means?
7 A. That the proper amount of breath was not administered
8 into the breath tube in order for it to be analyzed by the
9 Intoxilyzer.
10 Q. SO, does it mean that the defendant was at least a .17?
11 MR. EPSTEIN: objection.

12 THE COURT: sustained. Donlt answer.
13 Q. what does it tell you about the number of .17 attached
14 to the results?
15 MR. EPSTEIN: objection. Beyond the scope.
c· 16 THE COURT: Overruled.

17 A. As far as insufficient sample is concerned, that sample
18 that was put into the sample chamber and analyzed will be at
19 least that value or higher if a sufficient breath sample was
20 introduced.
21 Q. What would have happened if the defendant had blown
22 more air and sufficient sample into the Intoxilyzer?
23 A. Then we wouldn't have had this type of report saying
24 "insufficient sample." Then that breath sample would have been
25 analyzed, and the result would have been printed.
195
1 Q. Does insufficient .17 means that the defendant's blood
2 alcohol content could be less than .17?
3 A. No.
4 Q. why not?
5 A. Because this is the highest reading obtained from that
6 sample that was introduced into the sample chamber.
7 Q. And can the operator of a breath test affect the
8 analysis done on the breath in the machine?
c~
9 A. well, not on the breath in the machine but, however, i
10 he doesn't follow, he or she does not follow protocol, then tha
11 test would be invalid.
12 Q. And did officer Marshall follow protocol in the
13 administration of this test?
14 MR. EPSTEIN: Objection. other than the
15 videotape -- the only thing the witness has seen is the
16 video'?
17 THE COURT: Based on what you haVe seen in the
18 videotape.
19 A. Based on what I have seen in the videotape, it was
20 conducted properly
21 Q. I just want to ask you a couple more things. Some of
22 the terms you said, I just want to make sure what they are.
23 You said "air blank ll
before. What's an air blank?
24 A. The instrument will push air through the sample
25 chamber, and the reading that should be, obtained is .000. And
196
Zippo-peo-Cross(Epstein) 402
1 that is done before the test begins. Then the calibration chec
2 will be don~ using that simulator solution attached to the
3 instrument. Another air blank will then go through the system,
4 push out that sample from that cal check. Then the subject
5 breath sample will be introduced at the next point. And then
6 another air blank is then administered. And that particular
7 subject sample will then be pushed out through the sample
8 chamber.
9 MS. KOHLMANN: NO further questions. Thank you.
10 THE COURT: Cross-examination?
11 MR. EPSTEIN: Yes. May I have one second.
12 THE COURT: Yes, you may.
13 CROSS-EXAMINATION
14 BY MR. EPSTEIN:
15 Q. Good afternoon, again, Ms. Zippo.
16 A. Good afternoon.
17 Q. As part your job with the New York police Department,
18 you do field inspections, correct?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. And you also do calibration reports?
21 A. Yes.
22 Q. Would you agree that you need to adhere to standard
23 operating procedures when you--
24 A. I am sorry?
25 Q. would you agree you need to adhere to the standard
197
zippo-Peo-Cross(Epstein) 403
1 operating procedures when you do these reports?

2 A. Yes.
3 Q. And it's important when you are doing these type of
4 reports that you follow all the police Department guidelines?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. would you also agree that the standards addressed the
7 testing environment?
8 A. You mean as far as where the location is.
C.: 9 Q. Yes.
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. It's important that your environment be clean?
12 A. Yes.
13 Q. And, also, it's important that your environment be
14 free of any interference?

15 A. well, we would hope so, yes.
16 Q. What would you expect some of those interference might
17 be?
18 A. Well, as far as the room itself, if the temperature of
19 the room is too hot, it may interfere with the operation of the
20 Intoxilyzer. If there is any kind of detergent or perfumes,
21 that might interfere with the operation of the Intoxilyzer also.
22 Q. Like alcohol based sanitation products?
23 A. That's possible.
24 Q. And would you agree that those procedures -- having
25 good work environment, clean environment, free of interference
198
Zippo-peo-Cross(Epstein) 404
1 is vital to the integrity of the result?
2 A. Yes.
3 Q. Are you familiar with the New York State Department of
4 Health rules and regulations concerning the method of analysis
5 of the Intoxilyzer 5000?
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. And would you agree it's important to follow those
8 guidelines?
9 A. Yes.
10 Q. You had also testified just here, at the end of your
11 direct, that if the operator fails to follow protocol, it could
12 affect the reliability of the machine?
13 A. Yes. As far as that twenty-minute deprivation period
14 and following the checklist.
15 Q. And the twenty-minute deprivation period is something
c 16 that's important?
17 A. Yes.
18 Q. In fact, the breath test -- most studies show one 0
19 the most common problems of the breath test is the twenty-minute

20 deprivation period. would you agree?
21 A. I am not sure of that.
22 Q. It's definitely one of the things you are always
23 concerned about?
24 A. Yes.
2S Q. The videotape that you saw doesn't show the entire
199
Zippo~peo-Cross(Epstein) 405
1 twenty-minute deprivation period?
2 A. No.
3 Q. It doesn't show any of it, right?
5 Q. Would you agree that the deprivation period ends upon
6 the collection of the sample?
7 A. No. It should be done prior to the actual subject
-·, "
8 blowing into the instrument.
C- ' 9 Q. SO the entire twenty minutes up until the blowing into
10 the instrument?
11 A. Yes.
12 (continued on the next page.)
13 '* '* * *
.14
15
C.,..~: 16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
200
406
mm-e P. Zippo - People - Cross (Epstein)
Q. Do you recall on this videotape seeing Mr. Lopresti

2 place his hand into his pocket and then immediately placing his
3 hands into his mouth or the area of his mouth? Do you recall
4 seeing that?
5 A. No.
6 Q. You don't. If Mr. Lopresti did do that, do you think
7 that would be a violation of the 20-minute deprivation
8 peri od?
C.-.-··
9 A. Well, if something was inserted into his mouth, yes.
10 Q. If you were operating the Intoxilyzer 5000, motorist

11 you were giving the test to did that, placed his hand in his
12 pocket, then placed his hand to the area of his mouth, would
13 you 1 nsure nothi ng was pl aced 1 nto the mouth pri or to commenci ng
14 the test?
15 A. Yes.
16 Q. Now, when you're making this 20-minute observation
17 period, you're not just looking for them to put things in their
18 mouth, ri ght?
20 Q. You're also trying to make sure they don't do anything

21 such as bel ch I hi ccup, vorn; t I correct?
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. Sometimes, obviously, somebody can belch or burp, it's
24 really not that obvious, would you agree?
25 A. Okay. I will agree with that.

201
407
mmMe P. Zippo - People - Cross (Epstein)
1 Q. So when you're doing the 20-minute observation period,
2 it's really important to look closely?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. You wouldn't want to turn your back on that person?
6 Q. You wouldn't want to walk away from them?
8 Q. If there was testimony in this case from the arresting
C'
-'
9
10
officer who was, you saw was present in the video that Officer
Marshall who did'the test was only with Mr. Lopresti for five
11 minutes before the video was turned on, would that affect your
12 opinion about the reliability of the test?
13 A. Well I it doesn't have to just be the officer IDTU tech,
14 it could have been the other officer, arresting officer, also,
15 the officer who was taking the video.
16 Q. If Officer Marshall testified he didn't assign that
() 17 responsibility to anybody else but it was his responsibility
18 to make the 20-minute observation period and also told that
19 other fact, Officer Goris said Mr. Marshall I Officer Marshall
20 was only with Mr. Lopresti for five minutes before the video was
21 turned on, would that affect your opinion, at least to the
22 reliability?
23 MS. KOHLMANN: Objection, your Honor.
24 THE COURT: Do -you understand the question?
25 THE WITNESS: I think so.

202
408
1 Q. Thank you. I tried my best.
3 A. Yes. I mean that the test would not be valid.
4 Q. We have never met before today. right?
6 Q. We have never spoken on the phone?
7 A. No.
8 a. Each of the times you've testified in court, it's
9 always been for the prosecutor, right?
10 A. In IDTU, yes.
11 Q. And obviously, you weren't present for the testing of
12 Mr. Lopresti's breath?

14 Q. With respect to these field inspection reports that
15 you've testified to, you weren't present for any of those,

16 right, that you're aware of?
() 17 A. I don't recall. I was in a training period during
18 that time, so I may have went out with Mr. Hanna, but I don't
19 recall.
20 Q. When Mr. Hanna -- you don't recall specifically
21 watching Mr. Hanna do any of these particular tests?
22 A. I don't recall that method.
23 Q. The first time you were called about this case was
24 when?
25 A. It came to my attent10n the beginning of this week.

203
409
1 Q. Beginning of this week. This took place December of
2 2006 I correct?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. What documents did you review prior to coming in to
5 court to testify?
6 A. All of the documents that are -- with the exception of
7 the subject test.
B Q. Okay. When you say all the documents, you mean the
9 ones you have seen here in court that have been shown to you?
10 A. Yes; that have been generated or given from my
11 department.
12 Q. You had talked about in the forcing of the air out of
13 the sample chamber. When a motorist delivers repeated blows
14 into your sample chamber, prior ~o the machine printing out a
15 result, does the chamber in any way force that air out of the
16 machine prior to analyzing the next sample?
17 A. Well, if the sample does get analyzed and the
16 instrument 1n it does record but that sample is not collected
19 and it doesn't add to the next sample that's being introduced.
20 a. I'm not asking about stacking of samples. What I'm
21 trying to determine is when a motorist such as Mr. Lopresti in
22 this case delivers repeated breath samples into the deVice,
23 prior to there being a reportable result printed, does the
24 sample chamber force any of that air out before registering that
25 report?
204
410
1 A. I'm not sure.

2 a. Well, you know when a machine does record results it
3 causes air blank to force out the chamber?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. The air blank ;s collected through the breath tube?
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. Then the air is forced through the breath tube into the
8 sample chamber?
9 A. Yes.
10 Q. When the simulator is connected to the machine to make
11 sure that the machine is working properly when you do
12 ca11bration reports, it's connected to a side port of the
13 machine, correct?
14 A. Thatls correct.
15 Q. And that port feeds directly into the sample chamber?
16 A. Yes.
17 Q. Is there ever a· simulation done that's introduced
18 through the breath tube?
19 A. When we do cal checks and introduce interference,
20 yes.
21 Q. That's when do you the calibrations report that you
22 testified to, that you do testing other than what you do in the
23 field inspection reports?
25 Q. We'll get to that in a minute.

205
411
1 When you were trained by the -- actually, could you
2 take a look at the two simulator solution certifications from
3 the state that are in front of you concerning the two simulator
4 or lot numbers. If you take a look at them, they actually tell
5 you the amount of ethyl alcohol in the s1mulator solution,
6 correct?
7 A. Yes.
8 Q. It's supposed to be the amount of ethyl alcohol when
9 tested with properly operating breath test device will generate
10 a reading of .10?
11 A. Correct.
12 Q. What's the amount of the ethyl alcohol in one of those?
13 One of them is Exhibit Number 18. 06030, what's the amount of
14 ethy'J aleoho'l in simulator solution 06030?
15 A. You said Exhibit 18?
16 Q. Yes, 18.
17 A. I'm sorry. What's your question?
18 Q. What's the amount, the measured amount, of ethyl
19 alcohol in that simulator solution?
20 A. One -- 120.4 milligrams, 120.4 milligrams of ethyl
21 alcohol per one hundred milliliters of solution.
22 Q. 120.4 milligrams?
23 A. Right.
24 Q. Now I 1et 's - - that s supposed to reg; ster a read; n9 of

I
25 .10?
206
412
1 A. Correct.
2 Q. Let's take a look at Exhibit 16. First one was 120.4,
3 you sai d?
4 A. Correct.
5 Q. How much is in this one?
6 A. 120.8 milligrams ethyl alcohol.
7 Q. That one has a different amount?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. What's the reason for that?
10 A. That, I do not know.
11 Q. Now, when you were trained by the New York Police

12 Department were you told that when collecting evidentiary
13 withdrawn.
14 I believe you testified earlier that you never
15 collected evidentiary sample, correct?
.,·
C J 17 a. Would you agree that most of your experience deals with
18 controlled environments?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. So when I say controlled environments l talking about

21 what you did, IDTU, with the device without the pressure of
22 subject sample.
23 A. Yes.
24 Q. Are any of these calibrations that you do done
25 telephonically or CPU modem or all done in person?

207
413
mmRe P. Zippo . People - Cross (Epstein)
1 A. All done in person.
2 Q. There is a way to calibrate that machine through
3 telephone, correct?
4 A. Not that I'm aware of. I do know that all the jobs are
5 downloaded by, via modem.
6 Q. Is that system called COBRA, COB R A?
7 A. Yes.
8 Q. Where is the COBRA data stored?
9 A. I believe, at Highway District.

c~
10 Q. Is it shared with the district attorney's office, to
11 your knowledge?
12 A. I don't know that knowledge.
13 Q. That's something you would review is the COBRA data?
15 Q. Can't you if you want to take a look at the COBRA
16 data?
17 A. I guess we could, but that's not part of our job
18 duties.
19 Q. When you were reviewing to get ready to testify here in
20 court today, did you ask the district attorney's office to
21 download any COBRA data and give you any information about these
22 tests?
23 A. No.
24 Q. Now, when you were trained by the police department --
25 sorry.
208
414
1 In addition to these controlled type of tests, you also

2 had, obviously, experience with people who taught you how to do
3 the tests?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. So, we agree all of'your experience is in another lab
6 or through training?
7 A. Yes.
8 Q. Now, in this training you were told by the police
9 department and eMI, when collecting a sample the subject should
c 10 blow the breath tube 'for continuous ten seconds. Is that part
11 of the training?
12 A. Six to eight seconds.
13 a. Six to eight seconds is enough to collect evidentiary
14 sample in the training. Weren't you told when you train others
15 tell them to try to check the sample for ten seconds?
16 A. If they could, if a person could blow that long.
('
....
17 Q. That's because the goal of taking a sample with the
18 Intoxilyzer is to get deep lung sample, correct?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. When the Intoxilyzer generates a reading, obviously, it
21 prints it out, right? That's the evidence slip that you
22 referred to that said insufficient sample?
23 A. Yes.
24 Q. When you ordinarily run test reports on evidentiary
25 sample, it's not insufficient, the report would just give you
209
415
mm-e P. Zippo " People· Cross (Epstein)
1 the reading, right, say, for instance, this wasn't insufficient
2 case. it would say .17?
3 A. Yes.
4 a. But in this case, it didn't just say .17, it also says
5 insufficient sample?
6 A. Yes.
7 a. Insufficient sample is not one taken from the deep lung
8 a1 r?
9 A. Well, the instrument, it didn't meet that particUlar -.

10 breath sample did not meet of those criteria.
11 Q. Did not meet. Either time, pressure, slope or
12 duration?
13 A. Correct.
14 Q. Now, yo~ had testified just now on direct about one

15 thing we have to discuss a little bit here, which is you had
16 said that the,sample that was collected would be if they got a
17 sufficient sample, it would be at least that amount or higher.

18 Do you remember testifying to that?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. What scientific principle ;s that conclusion based
21 on?
22 A. Well, there just from the training that I received,
23 that that would be, that particular reading would be either that
24 reading or higher.
25 a. So, just the t rai ni n9 that you recei ved?
~-------------
r
210
416
mm-e P. Z1ppo - People - Cross (Epstein)
A. Yes.
Q. Was that just somebody giving you that, giving you that
information, telling you that?

A. Well, during my training with the manufacturer of the
instrument and also with the NYPD.

Q. Did they tell you a scientific principle that underlies
7 that opinion that you just gave the jury?
8 A. I' m not su re,
9 You don't know?

10 No.
11 So when you gave the opinion on direct examination that
12 a sufficient sample would have been that amount or higher, it's

13 just based upon what you were told?
14 A. Well, based upon the training that I received, yes.
15 Q. But you can't tell us the scientific data that it's

16 based on?
17 No.
18 Q. Are you familiar with the concept of Henry's law?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. SO, now, Henry's law provides that at a constant
21 temperature, the amount of a given gas that dissolves in a given
22 type and volume of liquid is directly proportional to the
23 partial pressure of that gas in equilibrium with that liquid.
24 It's a complicated way of saying it. Is that language that you
25 remember being told during the training seminars?

211
417
mm-e P. Zippo . People - Cross (Epstein)
1 A. Well, during NYPD training, yes.

",
2 Q. Let me give you something that may be, might be a
3 little more easy to go over.
4 Let's take a bottle of Coke~ Let's say over the lunch
5 hour I went out and got a bottle of Coca-Cola. Lid is close.
6 There's a little bit of liquid in there, and there's some space
7 between the liquid and top. If I kept that closed, the soda,
8 itself, would be bubbly, correct?
9 A. It should be.
10 Q. Now, in a closed environment is it your understanding
11 that that bubblY sensation in Coca-Cola comes from carbon
12 dioxide in the liquid solution, correct?
13 MS. KOHLMANN: Objection, your Honor.
14 Q. If you know.
16 A. Yes.
17 Q. Under Henry's law, directly proportional amount of
18 carbon dioxide in gas phase before the liquid or what we·call
19 the head space; ;s that correct?

20 A. Yes.
21 Q. Now, when we opened up that bottle of Coca-Cola 1n that
22 closed environment, when the lid is closed, can we agree that
23 there's a constant pressure and there's a constant volume, and
24 it's a closed environment?
25 A. Yes.
212
418
mm-e P. Zippo ~ People ~ Cross (Epstein)
1 Q. That no matter how long you keep that on the shelf, the
2 bubbles are going to stay in that liquid because of Henry's law,
3 right?
4 A. Okay. I'll say yes.
5 Q. If I open up that can of Coca-Cola over a period of

6 time, would you agree that that soda is going to become flat?
7 A. Yes.
8 Q. So what's going to happen, the carbon dioxide in the
9 liquid is actually going up and try to reach equilibrium but

C.
r~
10 since it's closed environment, all the carbon dioxide will leave
11 the bottle, correct?
12 A. Yes.
13 Q. Let me ask this question: Once the bottle is opened,
14 it's open environment, right?
15 A. Yes.
16 Q. Is that What we just discussed, Henry's law is that
c 17 principle that underlies a breath testing device such as the

18 Intoxilyzer 5000 in that there's a relationship between what's
19 in somebody's breath and what's in their blood?
20 A. Well, there is a relationship, yes.
21 Q. And is that because of Henry's law?
22 A. Well, it's based on that law, yes.
23 Q. Is it based on any other law beside Henry's law that
24 you're aware of?
25 A. r believe in the training there was some other laws

213
419
that were introduced.
2 Q. Beer-Lambert Law of Absorption?
3 A. Yes.
4 a. That applies to the way ethyl alcohol in absorbs
5 infrared energy?
6 A. I be 1i eve so I yes.
7 Q. SO, let's stay on Henry's law for a minute.
8 If the relationship or the scientific principle that.
9 underlies the Intoxilyzer relationship between breath and blood

C~
10 1s based on Henry's law, it's important in Henry's law to have a
11 closed environment. Can you explain how it applies in the

12 lungs. when the lungs are not in a closed environment, we're
13 constantly breathing?
14 A. Well, I don't know .- I'm not following you as far as
15 the line of questioning: I don't know what you are asking.

16 Q. You testified that there's -- that you've given the
c· 17 opinion that this was a sufficient sample, it would be this
18 amount or higher. I would proces~ some degree of knowledge.
19 I'm trying to ask you to explain to us how that is so in light
20 of this principle of Henry's law if Henry's law requires a

21 closed environment, constant pressure and constant volume, would
22 you agree that humans are not closed environments, we're
23 constantly breathing and things constantly coming from stomach
24 and breathing things from the air?
25 A. Yes I I 11 agree to that

I I yes.
214
420
1 a. How is it if the lungs are not a closed environment,
2 how does Henry's law even apply?
3 A. We're not talking about -. we're talking the sample
4 introduced into the instrument.
5 Q. But it was sample of breath air, wasn't it?
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. It's giving a reading of blood alcohol content?
8 A. Yes, it is.
C-',
9 Q. Now, can I have the -- in this particular case when the
.-'
10 machine printed out, it indicated that value printed was highest
11 obtained. Do you have it in front of you, actual printout?
12 A. Yes.
13 Q. Do you see where it says value printed was highest
14 obtained?
15 A. Yes.
16 Q. You've testified in the Bronx before you said, right?
C> 17 A. Yes.
18 Q. You testified in that case People versus Delacruz in
19 September. It appears from reviewing your prior testimony in
20 that case that that was insufficient sample case, correct?
21 A. Yes.
22 Q. What you said there -- I want to make sure I have it
23 right -- ;s this machine, when it took Mr. Lopresti's breath,
24 actually took other samples and CPU recorded other results which
25 were lower than the one ultimately printed?

215
421
mm-e P. Z1ppo - People - Cross (Epstein)
1 MS. KOHLMANN: Objection.
2 THE COURT: I'm confused. Delacruz or about this
3 case?
4 Q. I'll ask about this case. Am I correct that when
5 looking at this report, that says value printout was h1ghest
6 obtained. When Mr. Lopresti was giving. his breath sample, the
7 Intoxilyzer 5000 actually measured other reportable results but
8 didn't print them out?

9 A. That's possible, yes . .
C) 10 Q. In fact, that's how the program is set up, that's how
11 th~ machine is set up to act, correct?
12 A. Yes.
13 Q. That's what you previously testified to in the Delacruz
14 case?
15 A. Yes.
16 Q. SO what were those results of the analysis the machine
17 did of Mr. Lopresti's breath on December of 20061 Do you

16 know?
19 A. No, I do not.
20 Q. Because the machine didn't print them out?
21 A. Correct.
22 Q. Did you ask the district attorney to download --
23 withdrawn.
24 Would that be the type of information that would be in
25 the COBRA data?

216
422
1 A.' I'm not really sure. because I never actually looked at
2 any of the COBRA data.
3 Q. Did you ask the district attorney to look at COBRA in
4 Mr. lopresti's case to see whether or not what the other results
5 were?
6 A. No.
7 Q. The one that Ultimately was recorded was the highest
8 one that was obtained?
9 A. Yes.
C) 10 Q. SO we know that there were other results that were
11 lower?
12 A. I don t know that.
I
13 a. The Intoxi1yzer is manufactured by Colorado Mountain
14 Industries, correct?
15 A. Yes.
16 Q. Based in Kentucky; is that right?
17 A. Yes.
18 Q. You have been trained by CMI?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. They have gone over the user's manual with you, the
21 operator manual?
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. That 's actuall yin evi dance. Can we have - - I'm
24 shOWing you what's been received in evidence, Intoxilyzer 5000
25 operator manual. I'm going to direct your attention to Page 25

217
423
1 to start. Do you see page 25?

2 A. Yes.
3 a. There's a caption on that page that reads "Error
4 . messages"; correct?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. What does that mean, error messages, as you know that
7 term?
8 A. Well, message that could be put on the display of the
9 instrument saying that something has happened with the operation
10 of the instrument.
11 Q. Why would the operator of the Intoxilyzer SOOOEN be

12 concerned about an error message?
13 A. Well, if there's error messag~. they cannot conduct a
14 test.
15 Q. And can you please turn to page -- to the next page.
16 That then starts to list error messages, correct?
17 A. Yes.
18 Q. What ones do you see underneath the caption error
19 messages?
20 A. First one is stability fail.
21 Q. Next one?
22 A. Invalid test.
23 Q. What's the one after that?
24 A. Invalid sample.
25 Q. After that?
218
424
1 A. Inhi bi ted RFI.

2 Q. Keep going.
3 A. Insuffi ci ent.
4 Q. SO, now insufficient is under the listing of error
5 messages. Can you tell us what the.operator manual, read to the
6 jury, operator manual directs the operator to do in the case of
7 such an error message?

8 A. Under insufficient?
( .•.. .
.
,
.~-~'
~
9 Q. Yes.
10 A. SUbject did not provide adequate breath sample within
11 three minutes. the instrument display is insufficient and

12 completes the mode sequence. The instrument also indicated
13 insufficient sample on the printed card. Nothing is wrong with
14 the instrument. Instruct the sUbject to continue blowing until
15 lung capacity is completely eXhausted.
16 Q. Now, on direct examination you testified that the
17 machine was in proper working order. You also testified that

18 the machine takes three minutes to go through the sequence?
19 A. For the subject ~o blow, yes.
20 Q. Did you actually time -- withdrawn.
21 What is -- what is the starting point of the three
22 minutes?
23 A. When the indication on the Intoxilyzer reads, please
24 blow.
25 Q. What is the ending point of the three minutes, when

219
425
1 time is out?
2 A. Yes.
3 Q. Did you take a stopwatch and time the three minutes?
4 A. Sorry?
5 a. Did you take a stopwatch and time the length of time
6 that it took for the machine to time out in this case?
7 A. No, I did not.
8 Q. It was less than three minutes, would that indicate
9 there's a possible problem with the data clock?
10 A. That's possible, yes.
11 Q. That would affect your testimony about the reliability
12 of the machine?
13 A. If there was something wrong with the data clock?
14 Q. If it times out in less than three minutes.
15 A. Well, that would indicate a problem, yes.
16 Q. Now, this term "insufficient sample," that comes from
17 CMI, ri ght?
18 A. I believe so, yes.
19 Q. There's nothing, there's no other information that you

20 have other than the term "insufficient sample" as described by
21 the company that manufactured it?
23 Q. It's generated by the machine?
24 A. Well J it does print on the display, Intoxilyzer, yes.
25 Q. Now, you said that when the police operate the

220
426
1 Intoxilyzer 5000EN, their goal isn't to collect insufficient
2 sampl e, ri ght?
3 A, No. Their goal is to collect adequate breath sample

4 from the subject.
5 a. If you had a choice between sufficient sample and
6 insufficient, which one would you choose?
7 A. Of course. sufficient.
8 Q. When you do the calibration test, you run tests to
.. " 9 make sure that certain things, certain functions of the machine
(
are operati~g correctly, right?
. ..,~.
10
11 A. Yes.
12 Q. Can you take a look in this particular calibration
13 report that's in front of you which is People's 13. Do you see
14 that?
15 A. Yes.
16 Q. Now, when you did that, when you did this cal. you
17 didn't do the calibrations, correct? This wasn't you, this was
18 Gamil Hanna?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. You do these on a regular basis?
21 A. Well, I do on a department need basis. I'm not
22 assigned to the unit on a full·time basis.
23 Q. How many of these have you done, these calibrations,
24 approximately?
25 A. I don't know. I don't know number, but I've done

221
427
1 them.
2 a. More than ten?
3 A. I would say yes.
4 a. Do you see above calibration test there's a reading for
5 different types of tests that are done in the machine?
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. Now, one of them is invalid sample. Do you see that?
8 A. Yes.
9 a. Why is invalid sample test done?
10 A. That's in order to make sure that the instrument
11 recognizes mouth alcohol.
12 a. If so, how do you actually do the invalid sample
13 test?
14 A. We introduce Binaca spray or mouthwash spray into the
15 mouth and blow into the instrument when prompted to blow and
16 because there is residual of mouth alcohol in our mouths, the
c 17 instrument flags it as invalid sample.
18 a. Isn't that because the machine senses a spike in the
19 VAC reading?
20 A. It's sensing a spike, yes, in the alcohol content in
21 the mouth.
22 a. Correct me if I'm wrong, when you're there at the lab,
23 you haven't consumed any alcohol?
24 A. No. It's recognizing the mouth alcohol present in our
25 mouths.
222
428
1 Q. But you haven't consumed any alcohol?
2 A. No.
3 Q. Here's my question, then, what you know when you
4 introduce B1naca, it will detect. Do you do any test where
5 there's combined influence of, say, someone who had four beers
6 and some mouth alcohol, how do you know if the machine will work
7 in that scenario?
8 A. We do not test that when we do calibrations.
9 Q. Is it ever done?
10 A. No, not during our protocol with our calibrations, no.
11 Q. Next one, interfering, what is that?

12 A. We introduced two interferences to the instrument, one
13 ;s acetone and one is methanol. The instrument will flag that
14 these two substances are interference on the display and the
15 test won't go forward.
16 Q. If you're doing a test, subject test, and you get one
C~> 17 of these invalid samples of interference, you can't continue

18 with the test, right?
20 Q. It's unreliable result?
21 A. Sorry?
22 Q. It's unreliable, you can't continue?
23 A. You cannot continue.
24 Q. Now, you also do a test for insufficient sample?
25 A. Yes.
223
429
rnm-e P. Zippo ~ People - Cross (Epstein)
1 Q. And how is insufficient sample test calibrated?
2 A. Well I you can either do it two ways, have the
3 instrument time out by not introducing any breath sample into
4 the tube, or you can introduce small sample in the entire
5 instrument. Again. it will eventually time out and then the

6 instrument will flag it and read it insufficient.
7 Q. Why would you as a laboratory person, supervisor,
8 technician supervisor, want to know whether or not this detector
9 and device is working properly?
10 A. We want to make sure the instrument is working
11 properl y .
12 Q. Why do you want to know if it's going to register
13 insufficient sample, why is that important?
14 A. Because perhaps maybe when subject is tested there may
15 be insufficient samples ~-
Q.
c:· 17 A. - - of test site.

18 Q. That's important to know?
19 A. Of course.
20 Q. In fact, the manufacturer says that's important to
21 know?
A.
Q.
24 that wasn't working properly, you couldn't use that machine?
224
430
1 Q. You had said that on direct examination that you need
2 1.1 liters of air to have sufficient sample; is that correct?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. Would you agree that the more air -- withdrawn.
5 Would you agree that insufficient sample case you have
6 means you collected less than 1.1 liters?
7 A. All that might may be one of the reasons for
8 insufficient sample.
9 Q. One?
10 A. Well, it could be timed out, doesn't meet those
11 criteria.
12 Q. That means in that timing sequence you have, you
13 haven't collected sUfficient amount of air?
14 A. Yes, correct.
15 (Continued on the next page)
16
C': 17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
225
431
JD-F Ms. Zippo - People - Cross (Mr. Epstein)
1 Q. So wouldn't it be important to know how much air was
2 in a particular sample?
3 A. Well, it would be nice to know, but
4 Q. Would you agree that the greater -- would you agree
5 that the greater the volume of air the more reliable the
6 reading?
7 A. I wouldn't say the greater the volume of air. As long
8 as it meets the criteria in order for the sample to be analyzed.
9 Q. Let me rephrase it.
10 All other things being equal, if you have two samples,
11 let's say one with .1 liter and let's say one with .5 liters,
12 would you agree that the more volume of air the more reliable
13 the sample is7
14 A. Again, I don't really want to say the reliability of
15 the sample, but of course the more amount of air or the sample
16 volume, the better as far as the breath test is concerned.

17 Q. What was the sample volume taken from Mr. Lopresti in
18 the actual test that registered .17?
19 A. I do not know that amount.
20 Q. Isn't that amount recorded by the machine?
21 A. I'm not sure.
22 Q. You don't know?
23 Please take a look at People's Exhibit 15. In
24 People's Exhibit 15 -- what is People's Exhibit 15?
25 A. This was the other portions of the calibrations that

226
432
JD-F Ms. zippo - People - Cross (Mr. Epstein)
1 were done on November 14, 2006.
2 Q. Okay. Now, when you saw the other portions, do you
3 have a phrase for them? Is there any other way --
4 A. Well, these are the other readings that came out
5 during the calibration analysis.
'6 Q. Do these come out every time you do a calibration?
7 A. Yes.
8 Q. Are they kept with the other reports as well?
9 A. Yes.
10 Q. They're not filed separately?
11 A. No.
12 Q. SO is there something to say if we·are requesting them
.13 or in describing them? Are they called something specific, like
14 backup data or --
15 A. Well, when we send out the reports to the courts,
16 these particular sheets are not included in the packet.
17 Q. Why?
18 A. We just keep them with the instrument that we have
19 back at the laboratory.
20 Q. Why?
21 A. I don't know why.
22 Q. Okay. I'm going to ask you to take a look at these
23 documents. Specifically take a look at the test for
24 interferent, which I think the time is 1734, so if you're
25 looking through the reports, I see they're all timed.

227
433
1 A. Okay. You mean invalid sample 1744?
2 Q. 1734.
3 A. Oh, I'm sorry.
4 Q. I'm sorry. That's for the interferent test?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. Do you see on the interferent test it says interferent
7 subtracted?
8 A. Yes.
c) 9 Q. And underneath it, what does it read?
10 A. That that breath volume was 1.966 liters.
11 Q. Is that -- that's an indication of the actual volume
12 of breath that was put into the sample chamber; isn't it?
13 A. Yes.
14 Q. SO by looking at that document, can one conclude that
15 the machine does record the breath volume?
c::- 16 A. Yes. For this particular test, yes.
17 Q. Did you ask the district attorney to allow you to
18 access the COBRA data to find out what the breath volume that
19 was given in this particular case was?
20 A. No.
21 Q. Would you agree in your opinion the reliability of
22 insufficient samples is also premised on the reliability of the
23 other procedures that were utilized, such as the deprivation
24 period?
25 A. I'm sorry. Could you repeat that?

228
434
1 Q. Would you agree in your opinion that with respect to
2 the reliability of the tests done in this case in relation to it
3 being an insufficient sample is also dependent on all the other
4 circumstances in the reliability of the test, like a twenty
5 minute deprivation period?
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. Everything has to be looked at in its context; right?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. I'm going to ask you some questions about
10 MR. EPSTEIN: Judge, can we approach briefly?
11 THE COURT: Yes.
12 (Whereupon, there is a discussion held off the
13 record at the bench among the Court, defense counsels and
14 the assistant district attorneys.)
15 (Whereupon" the following takes place on the
c:': 16 record, in open court, in the hearing and presence of the
17 jury. )
18 THE COURT: We are going to take a short break,
19 ladies and gentlemen, about five to ten minutes.
20 Don't discuss the case, please.
21 THE COURT OFFICER: Jury exiting.
22 (Whereupon, the jury exits the courtroom.)
23 (Whereupon, there is a recess taken.)
25 record, in open court, in the presence of the Court, the

229
435
1 assistant district attorneys, the defense counsels and the
2 defendant.)
3 THE COURT OFFICER: Jury entering.
4 (Whereupon, the jury enters the courtroom.)
5 THE COURT: You can bring the witness in.
6 THE COURT OFFICER: Witness entering.
7 (Whereupon, the witness enters the cour~room.)
8 THE COURT: You may continue.
9 MR. EPSTEIN: Thank you.
10 CONTINUED CROSS-EXAMINATION
11 BY MR. EPSTEIN:
12 Q. Okay. Ms. Zippo, when we were about to break, I was
13 going to ask yon !:'lome quest ions about the "twenty-one hundred to
14 one ratio. Have you ever heard that term before?
15 A. Twenty-one hundred to one?
() 16 Q. To one.
17 A. Yes.
18 Q. Okay. And I know it's not tremendously interesting
19 stuff, but I will try to make it as interesting as I can.
20 Can we agree that the rntoxilyzer registers a reading
21 of blood alcohol content?
22 A. Yes.
23 And it takes a sample of breath air?
24 . A. Yes.
25 Q. And then it, through an internal mathematical

230
436
JO-F Ms. Zippo - People - Cross (Mr. Epstein)
1 conversion in its software, converts what it measures of breath
2 air into a blood alcohol content result?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. And that -- and are you familiar with the term
5 partition ratio?
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. Okay. And would you agree that a partition ratio
8 describes the relationship between the amount of alcohol
9 molecules in one's breath to the amount of alcohol molecules in
10 one's blood?
11 A. Yes.
12 Q. And would you agree that the twenty-one hundred to one
13 ratio is that ratio that the machine assumes all individuals
14 have as their own partition ratio?
15 A. Yes.
16 Q. Have you ever heard the term one size fits all?
17 A. Yes.
18 Q. Like you go to the store, you can buy large, extra
19 large, medium, and then they have these things called one size
20 fits all?
21 A. Yes.
22 Q. Would you agree that the twenty-one hundred to one
23 ratio is the equivalent of one size fits all?
24 A. Well, it is what it is.
25 Q. Right. Well, when you're doing a specific test for a

231
437
1 specific individual, you don't alter the blood to breath ratio
2 in the software; right?
3 A. No.
4 Q. It's a constant conversion for everybody?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. And people donlt necessarily have the partition ratio
7 of twenty-one hundred to one?
8 A. What do you mean, people?

r"·
\. .. •.
.
,
9 Q. Any individual person may not have a twenty-one
10 hundred to one partition ratio?
11 A. No, I --
12 Q. It's an assumed average?
13 A. It's an average, yes.
14 Q. And most of the population have a twenty-one hundred
15 to one ratio that is either at twenty-one hundred to one or
C.:: 16 above it; correct?
17 A. Possibly, yes.
18 Q. Okay, Now, would you agree that partition ratios can
19 vary from as low as thirteen hundred to one to as much as
20 thirty-one hundred to one?
21 A. I'm not sure.
22 Q. You're not sure, okay.
23 Would you agree that some people are above twenty-one
24 hundred to one and some people are below it?
25 A. I think it's possible.

232
438
1 Q. Okay. And the Intoxilyzer 5000 does not account for
2 variable partition ratios?
3 A. Well, it doesn't account for variables, period.
4 Q. Right. But if my client, Mr. Lopresti, had a true
5 partition ratio of less than twenty-one hundred to one, would
6 you agree that the Intoxilyzer would artificially inflate his
7 reported blood alcohol content level?
8 A. I don't want to agree. I'm not sure.

(
-""
.,
'- .. ' 9 Q. Yqu're not sure. Okay, that's fine.
10 But you would agree that it's not a direct
11 measurement, this device?
12 A. What do you mean, a direct measurement?
13 Q. A direct measurement of blood alcohol content.
14 A. Well, the instrument itself, like you said, and what I
15 testified to, it does take what the blood alcohol content is and
16 then applies that conversion factor.
17 Q. Well, it takes a breath, an analysis of breath; right?
18 A. Yes.
19 Q. Okay. So it's an indirect measurement?
20 A. I don't know if I would call it indirect, but --
21 Q. It doesn't directly measure blood?
22 A. Well, it doesn't measure blood. It's not a blood
23 sample.
24 Q. There are procedures for blood samples to be taken in
25 D.W.I. cases; correct?

233
439
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. Now, have you ever heard the time RFI?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. RFI is radio frequency interference; correct?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. And would you agree that when working properly, there
7 is an RFI detector inside the Intoxilyzer 5000?
8 A. There is a built-in antenna in the breath tube.
c> 9 Q. Do you know the makeup of that, what its composition
10 is?
11 A. No.
12 Q. You're not a technician that does maintenance on the
13 Intoxilyzer?
14 A. I have done very minimal maintenance. But as far as
15 changing the antenna or determining the components of the
16 antenna, I do not, no.

17 Q. Would you agree that cell phones emit RFI?
18 A. From what I had in my training, only certain types of
1'9 cell phones.
20 Q. What types of cell phones are those?
21 A. The Nextel type that are like radios, as.far as police
22 radios.
23 Q. Is that really what they told you in your training;
24 those are the only cell phones that emit RFI?
25 A. Yes.
234
440
1 Q. And what about the portable communication devices that
2 the police officers carry, do those emit RFI?
3 A. Yes. I also said those types as well.
4 Q. How about the machines themselves? I notice there's

5 two Intoxilyzers at the precinct. Are you familiar with the
6 current study that side-by-side machines generate RFI?
7 A. No.
8 Q. Now, would you agree that the proper procedure in
9 administering a test is to make sure that there are no cell
10 phones in the room that are turned on?
11 A. Well, there shouldn't be any type of interference, you
12 know, with the SUbject being tested.
13 Ot Okay. So, if there was a cp,ll phone that was on and
14 in the room, would you agree that you would want to know about
15 that?
16 A. Well, I mean, you wouldn't want to have that

C."
17 disturbance when a test is being conducted.
18 Q. When you watched this videotape, did you notice the
19 cell phone going off?
20 A. I don't remember.
21 Q. Okay. It wasn't something you made a note of?
22 A. No.
23 Q. If you did watch the videotape and you heard a cell
24 phone going off, would it be something that you would consider
25 would be important in making a determination about the

235
441
1 reliability of the results in the case?
2 A. Well, if it was a Nextel or police radio, then perhaps
3 the instrument would have been affected by it. But, again, it
4 would flag"it. It would corne on the display screen RFI, and the
5 test would not be able to go forward.
6 Q. Well, that's if the RFI detector was working; correct?
7 A. Correct.
8 Q. Do you know if the RFI detectors are ever calibrated
o 9 other than when you do your calibration reports?
10 A. I would say they were probably by CMI, by the company,
11 the manufacturer, eMI.
12 Q. And when is that periodically done?
13 A. I'm not sure. I would say when it's first
14 manufactured, and if we send the instrument back to the
15 manufacturer for
16 Q. How do you perform your RFI calibration tests?
17 A. With the police radio.
18 Q. You use a police radio?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. Did you ever try using a cell phone?
21 A. .No.
22 Q. SO how do you -- other than what they told you about
23 Nextels, do you have any other information that you can base
24 your testimony on that cell phones don't emit RFI?
25 A. Just from what I was trained on.

236
442
1 Q. Just what you were told?
2 A. Yes.
3 Q. Now, when you do the field inspection reports, you run
4 three tests using the same simulator solution; is that correct?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. And after the first time you run it, there is no
7 guarantee that the second one is going to run okay?
8 A. You mean when the instrument is going through the cal
C
·~
,
9 check?
10 Q. When you do -- let's start with your field
11 inspections.
12 When you run your field inspections, your plan is I'm
13 going to do three tesL~ to make sure the machine is working
14 properly; right?
15 A. Well, what happens is we set up the instrument to take
c 16
17
three cal checks, so it's done continuously.
Q. One right after the other?
18 A. Yes, and in between, of course, an air blank.
19 Q. So there's an air blank, a cal check, an air blank, a
20 cal check, an air blank·
21 A. Yes.
22 Q. -- another cal check, and then a final air blank?
23 A. Yes.
24 Q. Once you run the first cal check, there's no
25 necessary -- there's no guarantee that the rest are going to run

237
443
1 within proper ranges?
2 A. No. I mean, it could -- we could have any kind of
3 interferent, and, if so, the instrument will flag it, display it
4 and then we wouldn1t be able to go further.
5 Q. SO you do three tests to make sure they're operating
6 properly?
7 A. Yes.
8 Q. And when you do the calibration reports, you do five
9 tests on these
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. And, again, you set them all up to run simultaneously?
12 A. Yes. We enter five when we set up the testing
13 procedure.
14 Q. And this is the procedure done every time there's a
15 calibration report?
c 16
17
A.
Q.
Yes.
And every time there is a field inspection report?
18 A. Yes.
19 Q. So if your procedures of the police department guide
20 you to do five tests to ensure reliability and calibration
21 reports and three tests on the same solution to ensure
22 reliability of the field inspections, why do you only do one
23 test of an evidentiary sample of a person?
24 A. I don't know. That is just the protocol.
25 Q. Would you agree that it would be a better indicator of

238
444
JO-F Ms. Zippo - People - Cross (Mr. Epstein)
1 the reliability of the results of a person's breath to do
2 replicate testing?
3 A. I'm not saying as far as reliability. I mean, I guess
4 if you wanted to run another test, then you would have another
5 analysis value to compare it to.
6 Q. And you also could have another analysis to compare it
7 to and make sure it was done correctly?
8 A. Well, it would ensure that it was done correct and
9 also if you wanted to average, let's say, the two readings.
10 Q. Lastly, you had testified, or I should never say
11 lastly, but; almost lastly. You testified earlier that you need
12 a certain minimum amount to analyze in order to get an
13 insufficient sample. 80 you recall that?
14 A. A minimum amount of what?
15 Q. Breath air.
16 A. Yes.
17 Q. What is that minimum amount that you need to have an
18 insufficient sample reading?
19 A. I believe it's a half a liter, but I'm not sure.
20 Q. What is that belief based on?
21 A. From what I was told in training.
22 Q. But you're not sure?
23 A. 1 1 m not exactly sure right at this moment.
24 MR. EPSTEIN: I'm sorry. Can I have one second?
25 THE COURT: Yes.

239
445
1 (Whereupon, there is a pause from the record.)
2 Q. Okay. Would you agree that a breath test reading that
3 was taken at 1851 hours, or 6:51 p.m., is not necessarily
4 indicative of a person's blood alcohol content at 4:45, about
5 two hours before?
6 MS. KOHLMANN: Objection, Your Honor.
7 THE COURT: Can you answer the question?
8 A. I'm really not sure what you're asking me.
(~
-'
9 Q. Well, let me ask it this way. When you took the
10 training, you were told about absorption and elimination;
11 correct?
12 A. Yes.
13 Q. And you were told about the pror.ARs that the body goes
14 through when it absorbs alcohol and then when it eliminates it?
15 A. Yes.
c 16
17
Q. Would you agree it takes anywhere from thirty minutes
to three hours to fully absorb alcohol?
19 Q. If you know.
20 THE COURT: Is that within your area of
21 expertise?
22 THE WITNESS: I've been trained, yes, but it's
23 based on the average person, and there's all different
24 types of variables that could affect that.
25 Q. But there is a time period that it takes to fully

240
446
1 absorb alcohol?
2 A. Well, from the time the person takes their last drink,
3 yes.
4 Q. And then it would be important to know the timing of
5 the consumption of the drinks? That would be something that you
6 would want to know?
7 A. For me personally, I don't need to know that.
8 Q. For the breath test result, because the breath testing
9 result relates to a specific point in time.
10 A. You mean as far as this particular result that was
11 taken from the subject?
12 Q. Right. When you administer a test, forget -- any test
13 -that you administer, it relates to a subject's blood alcohol
14 ~ontent at a given point in time?
15 A. At the time the subject gave the breath sample, yes.
16 Q. And in this particular case Mr. Lopresti's breath
17 sample was provided and was analyzed at 6:51 p.m., so my
18 question to you before was, was his reading at 6:51 p.m. not
19 necessarily indicative of what the BAC reading was two hours
20 earlier, at 4:45 p.m.?
22 THE COURT: If the witness can answer the
23 question, she can answer it.
24 Is that within your area of expertise?
25 A. I would say it would be my opinion that it would

241
447
1 probably have been higher at that point.
2 Q. And that would require you to know about absorption
3 and elimination of the alcohol by Mr. Lopresti?
4 A. For me to know that?
5 Q. Yes. To make that opinion, you would need to know
6 whether or not he is fully absorbed; correct?
7 A. Okay. I don't know where you're going with this,
8 but
c 9 Q. I'm asking you whether or not in order to make that
10 determination, whether you would need to know if he was fully
11 absorbed or he can still be absorbing alcohol?
12 A. He could have still been absorbing and eliminating at
13 the same time.
14 MR. EPSTEIN: One moment.
15 (Whereupon, there is a pause from the record.)
o 16
17
Q. SO it's not necessarily the case -- you just gave your
opinion before that he was -- it was your opinion that it was
18 higher at the time, the BAC level was higher. That i~ not
19 necessarily the case unless you have the information to know
20 whether he was fully absorbed at the time he took the test?
22 THE COURT: On what basis?
23 MS. KOHLMANN: Her previous answer.
24 I don't know if Your Honor wants this at the
25 bench.
242
448
1 THE COURT: Can you answer the question?
2 A. Can you just repeat that again?
3· THE COURT: Objection overruled.
4 Q. You just a moment ago gave this opinion about whether
5 or not his blood alcohol content at an earlier point in the day
6 was higher or lower.
7 Do you recall that?
8 A. It could have been higher. I don't know that.
9 Q. And it also could have been lower?
10 A. Possibly.
11 Q. Okay. Are you familiar with what a tox trap is?
12 A. Excuse me?
13 Q. Tox trap. Do you know what a tox trap is?
14 A. No.
15 MR. EPSTEIN: No further questions, Your Honor.
16 THE COURT: Any redirect?
17 MS. KOHLMANN: Yes, JUdge.
18 REDIRECT EXAMINATION
19 BY MS. KOHLMANN:
20 Q. Are breath test operators in the New York City Police
21 Department instructed to ever take a second breath test of a
22 subject?
-
23 A. To my -- I do not have any knowledge of that, no.
24 Q. And does an insufficient sample mean an invalid
25 sample?
243
449
JD- Ms. Zippo - People - Redirect (Kohlmann)
1 A. No.
2 Q. And if a cell phone went off at the 45th Precinct
3 after a test was concluded and during questions, would that have
4 affected the test?
5 A. Not to my knowledge.
6 Q. And when counsel asked you before when you were called
7 about this case, your lab was called much earlier than Monday;
8 right?
9 A. Yes, the laboratory was, but I wasn't notified.
10 Q. And you're filling in for a colleague who is on
11 vacation this week?
13 Q. And you were given materials by that colleague?
14 A. Yes.
15 MS. KOHLMANN; Thank you. No further questions.
16 MR. EPSTEIN: No further questions.
17 THE COURT: You may step down. You're excused.
18 (Whereupon, the witness is excused.)
19 (Whereupon, the proceedings continued, but were
20 not transcribed.)
21 (Whereupon, court is recessed and the case
22 adjourned to May 31, 2011, at 10:00 a.m.)
23
24
25
244
EXHIBIT C - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

Article, Dated March 2006,
Titled "Demystifying The Intoxilyzer 5000
by Mary Catherine McMurray
(pp. 244-268)
245
DEMYSTIFYING
THE INTOXILYZER 5000*
by Mary Catherine McMurray **
* Some ofthe materials in this chapter were originally received by the author in the
form of uncopyrighted handouts provided at the 1993 Intoxilyzer 5000 User's Group
which met in Missoula, Montana. The text from that forum has been edited and amended
with many additions to keep abreast ofthe instrumentation.
** Mary Catherine McMurray is a forensic consultant working out of Wisconsin.

She has been a forensic consultant since 1986 and has qualified in Federal, State, and
Municipal Courts, in both civil and criminal cases. Ms. McMurray has given numerous
professional training classes, seminars and meetings on issues relevant to evidential
breath alcohol testing and the instrumentation. She may be reached at (608) 437-5344.
Mary Catherine McMurray Page 1 of24 March 2006

246
GENERAL PRINCIPLES
Introduction
THE OPTICAL BENCH
The IR Light Source

The Sample Chamber Lenses
The Sample Chamber
The Filter Wheel
The Internal Standards
The IR Detector
The 6800 and 6801 Series Intoxilyzer 5000
Summary of the Optical Bench
TRACKING THE CHANNEL PROCESSOR
The Processor Board

The Channels
The AGC Circuit
Establishing the Timing and Base Separation of the Channels
Amplification and Rectification
The Alcohol Analysis
Interferant Subtract
Interferant Detect
Sample and Hold
Differential Voltage Measurement, DVM
THE CENTRAL PROCESSING UNIT, CPU
The Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory, EPROM

The Microprocessor
The CPU Crystal
The Parallel Input Output Device, PIO
The Real Time Clock, RTC
The Random Access Memory, RAM
The Analog to Digital Converter, ADC
The Address and Data Busses
ADAMS OR COBRA SYSTEMS
SYSTEM CIRCUIT DESCRIPTIONS 68 SERIES
Functional Switch Board Assembly

Communication Board Assembly
Internal Printer Board Assembly
Controller Board Assembly
Analog Processor Board Assembly
CPU Board Assembly
Mother Board Assembly
Sample Chamber
IR Source, lenses, filters, detector
CHART SUMMARIZING INTOXILYZER 5000 VERSIONS

247
GENERAL PRINCIPALS
INTRODUCTION
The proper function of any breath test instrument depends upon harmony and stability. The
signals and voltages within the boards must be stable and work in harmony with each other. The
boards must exist within a stable instrument.
Essential to tracking the processor signals, is an understanding of how these signals are
generated. To facilitate this understanding a basic discussion of the optical bench and the
processor board is necessary. The optical bench is the "heart" of the instrument. It is composed
of a light source, the chamber lenses, the chamber, the filter wheel, the detector and the
processor(s). Even though the processor is an essential part of the optical bench it will be
discussed separately.
The infrared light source is located at one end of the sample chamber while the detector is at the
opposite end. Light energy is passed through the sample chamber, through each of the filters and
focused on the detector. Energy reaching the detector is converted to an electronic signal, which
is then converted to a numeric reading.
THE OPTICAL BENCH
sa ,Ie
in comino
chamber lens Infrared
detector
sample chamber
chamber lens
eXh~ust filter wheel
light source to pressure

switch
processor board

248
THE IR LIGHT SOURCE

I
As the name indicates the IR light source is where the infrared light is generated. The IR source
must be able to provide adequate energy2 of the required wavelengths and must provide a stable
output of this infrared energy. The Intoxilyzer 5000 utilizes a (quartz iodide) tungsten filament
halogen light bulb as an IR source. The bulb has been back-coated with a reflective material to
optimize the IR energy directed into the sample chamber. Cloudy or opaque bulbs reduce signal
output. Poor alignment of the IR source to the detector also reduces the strength of the signal.
Weak signals require greater amplification) than strong signals.
THE SAMPLE CHAMBER LENSES
The sample chamber lenses gather and focus the light energy entering and exiting the sample
chamber. The lens mounted on the light source end of the chamber will gather the IR light and
project it through the chamber.4 The lens mounted at the exit side of the chamber will re-gather
the light and focus it onto the filter wheel. The lenses should provide good gathering and
focusing ability while blocking very little of the IR light. The Intoxilyzer 5000 uses Poly IR5
Fresnel 0.065" thick lenses. Cloudy or opaque lenses will block light and reduce the signal
output. Scratches on the lenses will scatter light reducing the signal output.
THE SAMPLE CHAMBER
The sample chamber is where the sClmple will he collected and held for the analysis. The sample
chamber must be heated to avoid the development of condensation from the breath/air sample
onto the surfaces of the lenses or the walls of the chamber itself. The temperature of the sample
chamber must be relatively constant throughout the analysis. The operating temperature of the
original sample chamber in the Intoxilyzer is 45° +/- 5° C. It should be noted that sample
chamber temperatures below 47° C have resulted in "ghost readings".5 The newest version of
the Intoxilyzer (the 5000EN a.k.a. the 6801 series, the 1768 or the MN model) has a temperature
range of 47° +/- 5° C and is capable of reporting the actual temperature of the sample cell at the
time of testing.
The sample chamber must be sealed so that the incoming sample will not leak out and outside air
cannot enter, thus diluting the sample. The volume of the sample chamber is not a critical issue
IIR is an abbreviation for Infrared Radiation. Infrared tight is just below the red end of the visible light spectrum.
2Light is energy. When referring to tight energy the tenn wavelengths is used. Each wavelength corresponds to a discrete
amount of energy. Wavelengths are measured in microns (~). I fl = 0.000001 meter.
3 When any kind ofelectronic signal is amplified any noise associated with the signal will also be amplified.
4 The process of gathering the light and projecting it through the chamber is often called collimating. The reverse process,
namely taking a column of light and focusing it is referred to as focusing.
5 Ghost readings. or blank breath phantom readings. ranging from 0.007 to 0.025 were reported in December 1990 by the State of
Colorado Department of Public Health) in a letter addressed to Tom Meyers at eM!. Other sources for ghost readings are
unstable power supplies or DVM and debris in the sample chamber.

249
in the 6400 or 6600 series6 instruments. In these older devices the analysis of the breath sample
8
is not volume dependent, but rather time, pressure and "slope"? dependent. In the 68 series
Intoxilyzers, the volume of the breath exhaled is much more critical. In these instruments the
slope after a minimum volume of breath is exhaled9 determines if a sample is adequate. The
volume of the sample chamber is 81.4 cc for the older Intoxilyzer 5000s. The newest version of
the Intoxilyzer 10 series, model 5000EN or 6801, is reported to have a sample chamber volume of
82.2 ml. The breath path is completely separated from the path that the alcohol standards use in
the 68-01 versions.
The 68 series Intoxilyzers have the ability to measure and report the volume of the breath sample
through the use of a pressure transducer. I I As the breath moves past the transducer the
temperature of the transducer changes causing a change in the flow of electric current through
the transducer. The change in current flow during the course of the entire exhalation is then used
to determine the volume of breath delivered. The duration of the exhalation (how many seconds
did the person blow) is not measured or reported. The transducer is connected at the breath tube
connector.
Of primary concern with all IR spectrophotometers is the resolution of the sample chamber.
"Resolution" is a term used to describe how much light is able to pass through the chamber. The
infrared light as it leaves the lens on the light source end will spread throughout the sample
chamber so that the chamber is flooded with the IR light. It is then collected and focused onto
the filter wheel as it exits the sample chamber. The resolution of the system should provide good
contact between the IR light and the sample. Scratching, pitting, corroding or condensation on
the inner surfaces of the sample chamber l2 will reduce the resolution of the chamber and can
cause poor precision in analysis.
6 The first four digits of the serial number indicate which series the device is. For example: if the serial number is 64-001122 the
machine is a 6400 series.
7 Slope detection in breath alcohol testing refers to the change in alcohol concentration over time during the analysis of a breath
sample. A zero slope would indicate that the sample concentration is at a constant value, a plateau. The leveling off of the
sample concentration to an almost constant value is used as an indicator of having deep lung, or alveolar, air.
s The 68 series instruments have a cooled detector, three to five filters, and may have dry gas capabilities. The Federal Register
identifies the three-filter device as a 5000 CD and the first generation five-filter as a 5000 CD/FG5. The display and printing of
the exhaled breath volume information can be controlled with a mode selection switch. State requested options on the 6800
instruments have included retrofitting the devices with pressure switches instead of pressure transducers. Such devices will not
be capable of reporting sample volumes. The second generation of the 68 series is the Intoxilyzer 5000EN, a.k.a. the 1768, the
6801 (because of the serial number), or the Minnesota model.
9 The volume of breath is measured as a function of temperature change affecting a transducer.
10 The 6801 series was created as a result of modiiications requested by the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension
Laboratory after their evaluation of the five filter Intoxilyzer (the 5000 CDIFG5, a.k.a. the 768). Many of the modifications were
intended to improve the maintenance accessibility of the device.
II A transducer is a semi-conductor that exhibits a relatively large change in resistance as a function of temperature.
12 The sample chambers of the 6400 and 6600 series Intoxilyzer 5000's have had problems associated with pitting and flaking of
the sample chamber. See "Flaking or Flaky: CMI's Intoxilyzer Model; 5000" by Gil Sapir, J.D., M.Sc. Drinking Driving Law
Letter Vol. 14. No. 23, Nov. 10,1995.

250
THE FILTER WHEEL
The light exiting the chamber consists of IR, UV and visible

light. 13 The light must be filtered so that only selected
wavelengths of IR energy are allowed to pass onto the
detector. Multiple wavelengths are utilized for analysis to
increase the specificity of the analysis. Up until the
beginning of the new millennium, the Intoxilyzer 5000
employed a filter wheel with narrow-band pass filters!4
mounted in precise locations for the filtering of the IR light.
Three-filter instruments 15 use the 3.80, 3.48 and 3.39 micron
wavelengths. The five-filter instruments 16 use the 3.80, 3.52,
3.47, 3.40, and 3.36 micron wavelengths. The 5000EN
started using wide-band filters!? shortly after being
introduced to the market.
The filters are also used to establish the internal standard/ 8 of the instrument. Dirty filters will
reduce the output of the signal, thus requiring greater amplification, and can lead to processor
instability.
The filter wheel rotates between the sample chamber and the detector at a constant speed
between 1800 to 2400 rpm. The filter wheel has a notch in it, which is placed so that it will align
with a photo-interrupter. The photo-interrupter is a device, which has a light emitting diode
(L.E.D.) on one face and a receptor on the other. As the filter wheel rotates between these two
faces, the notch will line up with the photo-interrupter allowing a burst of cncrgy from thc
L.E.D. to shoot through the notch and strike the receptor. If the filter wheel is turning at a
constant speed this burst of energy should occur at the same time on each rotation and a timing
base can be established for the separation of the three (or five) wavelengths and the sequencing
of the analysis is created. Erratic motor speeds cause instability in the electronic signals, which
can affect the timing of the device. One modification of the 6800 series is the use of two photo-
interrupters with the filter wheel. One interrupter looks at the filters, while the other looks at the
complete loop. The two interrupters synchronize the separation of the signals for each
wavelength.
13 Infrared energy is lower in energy than the red end of the visible spec\TUm. Ultra-Violet (UV) light is just above the violet end
of the visible spectrum. Visible light consists of red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo and violet light.
14 The narrow band pass filters allow only the IR light near the wavelengths desired to pass through and strike the detector.
I S Three filter instruments can correct for acetone and water vapor.
16 Five filter instruments are capable of identifYing and correcting for acetone and water vapor and should stop testing if there is
acetaldehyde, isopropanol, or toluene present.
17 Wide-band filter will allow more frequencies near the midpoint to pass thru, thus yielding a stronger signal at the
loss of sensitivity to interferents.

18 Internal Standards are not functionally equivalent to a calibration eheck using an alcohol standard. Internal standards are
beam attenuators that may be used ns voltage references but do nothing to check the analytical path or sample delivery system.
Internal standards have never been approved by NHTSA or any other regulating agency as calibrating units for evidential or non-
evidential breath alcohol testing devices.

251
THE INTERNAL STANDARDS
The filters, in addition to filtering out the unwanted frequencies, are lenses and will attenuate
(focus) a portion of the IR light onto the detector resulting in the production ofa unique amount
of energy in the detector. In fact, whenever a particular filter is placed between the sample
chamber and the detector the same amount of energy will be produced each and every time -- as
long as the device is still in calibration. This energy production is unique for each and every
filter giving each filter its own unique internal standard factor. 19 The internal standard factor
can be directly linked to both the established channel voltages and the calibration of the
instrument. The internal standards should reflect any changes or shifts in the channel voltages or
the calibration but they are not a substitute for an external standard. Testing by this author has
demonstrated that the calibration of the Intoxilyzer 5000 can drift out oftolerance on the analysis
of vapor samples without the internal standard aborting the test.
Adjustments made to the calibration will affect the settings for the internal standards. For this
reason, whenever calibration adjustments are made the internals must be reset. Adjustments to
the settings for the internal standards may cause changes in the calibration and thus the
calibration must be checked after such adjustments.
THE IR DETECTOR
The endpoint for the light is the infrared detector. This is a very sophisticated device that does a
rather simplc job. Thc IR dctcetor is responsible for converting the filtered IR light into
electrical energy. When light of each of the filtered wavelengths strikes the detector a certain
level of energy (signal) is produced for each wavelength. The amount of signal produced is
directly proportional to the amount of light able to pass through the sample chamber and strike
the detector. A noisy detector causes instability in the output signal (the DVM) of the processor.
THE 6800 AND 6801 20 SERrES INTOXILYZERS
The 68 series Intoxilyzers have cooled detectors. 21 The advantage of the cooled detector is the
improved signal output from the detector requiring less amplification. This is significant
because whenever a signal is amplified, noise is also amplified. A stronger signal gives greater
stability to the electronics of the instrument because there is less noise. The cooled detector has
improved the low alcohol-concentration response. The cooled detectors are capable of
accurately measuring alcohol concentrations down to 0.01 grams per 210 liters. The cooled
detector is a single stage, thermoelectrically cooled, lead-selenide detector with an integral
19 The internal standard factor is like a fingerprint for that filter. In the calibration process the internals (1, 2, 3) are set \0 equal
0.100,0.200 and 0.300 respectively.
20
6801 infonnation is from seminar materials prepared by Eldon Ukestad of the MN BeA Lab for a seminar
presented Nov. 7,1997 in St. Paul, MN.
21 TIle Intoxilyzer 1400 is also a cooled detect instrument.

252
thermistor for temperature regulation. Thermistor controlled electronic cooling maintains the
internal temperature of the detector at approximately 0° C. The life expectancy for a cooled
detector is at least seven years.
In the earlier section on sample chambers, it was discussed how the pressure transducer
functions to determine if a sample is of sufficient volume and or longevity. It must be noted at
this time that some states have opted to purchase the 6800 series devices with a pressure switch
instead of a transducer. This modification removes the ability to measure breath volume.
The calibration of the 6800 and 6801 series of devices are conducted through a programmed
calibration mode. The three digit assay values of the solutions used for the calibration (up to 5
solutions) are entered, through the keyboard, into the memory of the device. The various vapor
samples are then introduced into the instrument -- through the calibration port -- and the
instrument adjusts the signal responses appropriately and stores the information digitally.
Calibration of the analytical system is controlled by processor board hardware and software and
is stored in memory.
The Intoxilyzer 5000EN (serial numbers that start with 68-01) has the breath path and the
calibration path separated. Separating the breath path from the calibration path meant the
solenoid valve could than be removed from the breath path. Removing the solenoid valve from
the breath path reduced the resistance in the breath path, making it easier to provide a sample.
The solenoid valves are still necessary for the calibration port control. The valves were
subsequently reduced in size and moved to the back of the case between the sample chamber and
the case wall. This latter revision made it possible to reconfigure the layout of the analytical
bench, thus allowing [01' a new design where the light source can be accessed much easier and
quicker. A leak in the sampling or calibration path can cause erroneous sampling messages such
as "IMPROPER SAMPLE".22
One problem that exists with the 68-00 and earlier Intoxilyzers is that debris from the breath path
would collect in the first solenoid valve. There was at one time a screen trap that could be
cleaned or replaced. The screen was ultimately eliminated due to sampling problems caused by
resistance to passage of air through the screen when the screen was dirty. Devices that do not
have the screen, or some other type of debris trap, will need more frequent cleaning of the breath
path, solenoid and sample chamber. It is not apparent from any of the 68-01 Intoxilyzer
materials whether any debris traps are on the breath path prior to entry into the sample chamber.
The specificity of the Intoxilyzers has been improved with the use of five filters. The additional
23
wavelengths for analysis have increased the likelihood of rejecting other chemical compounds.
22 The Minnesota BeA lab collectS and saves the training materials for the schools conducted. This author found
several 5000ENs that were flagging improper samples during the cal checks. The notes by the student operators
indicated that the improper samples were occurring with no one blowing at the time of the error message. The
maintenance technician's notes included with the training material explained that the error message was the result ofa
"small" leak in the sampling system.
23 The choice of the additional tllters in the 3.5 f.lm range was unfortunate, in that the C-H bonds of the methyl group are still
being sought. The 9.5 f.lm range is more specific for primary alcohols.

253
However, the failure to calibrate at these wavelengths removes the ability of the Intoxilyzer to
make any corrections for these other compounds. In evaluation testing the five-filter instruments
4
have flagged some chemical mixtures that displayed apparent alcohol concentrations.2 If any
type of interferant is flagged or subtracted the test results must be verified through an alternate
test other than breath. The use of wide-band filters will increase the signal strength but a
corresponding loss of sensitivity to detecting chemical interferents.
The most significant change that occurred in the development of the 6801 series was the
complete separation of the calibration path and the breath path. The breath path no longer passes
through the solenoids, thus removing some of the uncomfortable backpressure that is frequently
complained about with the Intoxilyzer 5000. The solenoid valves now isolate the simulator
sample path from the sample chamber and pump exhaust except when a simulator sample is
taken or an air blank is performed?5 The complete separation of the calibration path and the
breath path introduces the question of verifying the breath path calibration. The only way to
assure that there is nothing in the breath path or software that would cause erroneous readings is
by introducing a known sample through both paths.
SUMMARY OF THE OPTICAL BENCH
The IR source is projecting IR energy into and through the sample chamber where the light will
spread; thereby flooding the chamber with IR energy. This IR energy is gathered and re-focused
by the exit lens onto the filter wheel. The filter wheel is rotating at a constant speed between the
chamber and the detector. When the notch of the filter wheel aligns with the photo-interrupter, a
burst of lighl energy passes through and eslablishes the liming for the operation. As each filter
aligns with the detector a specific wavelength of the IR light is allowed to pass and strike the
detector. The strength of the signal created from the detector is based upon the amount of IR
light of that wavelength that exits the sample chamber. A separate signal is established for each
of the wavelengths utilized in the analysis. The signals are then sent to the processor for
analysis.
TRACKING THE PROCESSOR SIGNAL

THE PROCESSOR BOARD
When the filters in the filter wheel line up between the lens of the sample chamber and the
detector, a burst of light strikes the detector causing a burst of energy to be produced. For each
24 An "apparent alcohol concentration" is a reading on a breath alcohol analyzer that is actually being caused by a chemical other
than alcohol. The calibration for the lntoxilyzer assumes that the chemical being measured is ethanol. Not all chemicals will be
measured in a I: I ratio with ethanol on the breath.
25 A cross connection between the simulator side of the pump exhaust and the simulator inlet equalizes pressure between the
simulator inlet and outlet whcn the valves are not activated. Opening the simulator inlet solenoid valve during simulator
sampling through the calibration port closes the connection.

254
filter the detector will produce a corresponding burst of energy. The bursts of energy, when
amplified and rectified, are an electrical signal for that channel. The signals coming from each
of the channels must then be massaged back into a single signal. After processing the signals
from each channel the processor output is referred to as the DVM or differential voltage
measurement. The change in the DVM during a test is directly related to the ethanol reading that
is reported. Poor precision in ethanol readings can be caused by poor contact between the power
board, processor board and/or CPU board connectors.
The 68 series Intoxilyzers have a processor board that uses a slave microprocessor dedicated to
the analytical tasks. All aspects of alcohol measurement and the discrimination of chemical
interferents are managed by the slave microprocessor. This system updates the alcohol
measurements every quarter of a second. Each alcohol concentration update is based upon
roughly 30 rotations ofthe filter wheel.
THE CHANNELS26
In the three-filter Intoxilyzer, two of the three wavelengths, the 3.48 and the 3.39 11m, are for
measuring the alcohol and subtracting off acetone and water. The third wavelength, the 3.80
J.lm, demonstrates no reactivity with the alcohol molecule or other substances that are normally
found in the breath of a normal individual. For this reason, the 3.80 11m wavelength is used as a
reference channel 2? for the system. With the five-filter devices the 380 channel remains the
reference channel, while the 347 channel is for quantifying alcohol and the remaining three
channels --352, 340 and 336-- are for detecting chemical interferents.
The signals generated by the detector are sent to the first stage amplifier. Here the signals from
the detector begin the process of amplification. The signals are amplified so that any change in
their strength is readily recognized. Amplification of a signal also includes amplification of any
noise associated with that signal.
THE AGC CIRCUIT
The next step in the process is for all three signals to pass through the Automatic Gain Control
(AGC). The AGC circuit stabilizes and allows the system to compensate for variations in signal
strength due to collection of dust or dirt on the light source, lenses, filters, or detector. It can
also compensate for variations in signal strength resulting from the loss of signal due to aging of
the light source. The AGC circuit it will branch out to the 380, 348 and 339 sections of the
processor once the signal has stabilized.
16 The five-channel processor operates on the same principles as the three-channel processor. The added filters improve the
specificity of the analysis.
27 At this point the tenn wavelength will be dropped and the term channel, or channel voltage, used. This change in terminology
reflects the fact that we are no longer working with light energy, instead we are working with electrical energy. Therefore, the
380 channel is the reference channel, the 348 channel is the alcohol analysis channel and 339 is the acetone detection channel. -

255
The AGC circuit is a very common system in devices where a constant output is required. A car
radio is a common example of a device employing an AGC system. When you tum on a radio
and adjust the volume to a comfortable volume, you do not have to continually readjust the
volume depending on the distance you travel away from or towards the signal source. An AGC
circuit does the adjusting for you, automatically increasing the volume as you move away from
the tower and decreasing the volume as you move toward the tower. If there is not sufficient
source signal to work with the radio station is lost.
ESTABLISHING THE TIMING AND BASE SEPARATION OF THE CHANNELS
Up to this point all three channels have been grouped together. Now each individual channel
voltage must be isolated. Following the signal from the AGC it will come into contact with
SWl, a high-speed switch. One could compare this high-speed switch to a gate. The gate is
triggered to open at just the right moment in time to allow the passage of the 380 signal and then
to close, blocking the passage of the other two signals. This process bases the energy being
conducted through the rest of the 380 circuitry on the signal generated by the 3.80 !-tm light. The
timing base for this event is established by the phase lock loop.
Earlier, the importance of the notch in the filter wheel and the photo-interrupter was discussed.
It is that burst of energy which initiates the phase lock loop. The phase lock loop (PLL) consists
of two primary components: the trigger and the counter. The burst of energy from the photo-
interrupter is sent to the trigger and then to the counter. The counter will establish a time base of
ten counts between each energy burst of the photo-interrupter. Each of the counts between these
energy bursts can also be divided into units of ten, thereby establishing a constant time base.
The actual speed of the motor is not as critical as the requirement for a constant speed. The
timing of all sequences is determined by the chopper revolutions.
The counter will send signals to other components at prescribed time counts. For example
assume that there is a count often between the energy burst of the photo-interrupter and the 380
signal. By counting down from ten the counter can send a signal to SWI opening the "gate" and
then closing it again. This same process is used for SW2 and SW3 as well, so that a "burst" to
"burst" event would be:
BURST/987654321 O/SW Iopen/380/SW Iclose/987654321 O/SW2open/348/SW2close/
9876543210/SW30pen/339/SW3c1ose/9876543210IBURST
This is in essence the sequence that is used to isolate the three channels in the processor and
occurs at a rate of2200 +/- 200 times a minute.
AMPLIFICATION AND RECTIFICATION
After isolating the 380 signal it is once again amplified, this time in the 380 amplifier. The
signal is then rectified. The signal prior to the 380 rectifier is the type of signal known as a sine
wave. This type of signal cannot be measured using the voltmeter, nor is it a proper type of

256
signal on which to base the analysis. By passing the 380 signal through the 380 rectifier the
signal is now converted into a DC voltage level and is readily measurable. Careful examination
of other channels will show that all of these sections undergo the same type of amplification and
rectification as does the 380 channel.
THE ALCOHOL ANALYSIS
The 380 channel is the reference channel and the 348 28 channel is responsible for the alcohol
analysis. The two signals are brought together in the 380, 348 comparitor. The voltage level of
the reference channel and the alcohol channel are set to approximately the same voltage since the
alcohol analysis is measured by determining the loss of 348 wavelength light. When these two
voltages are fed into the 380, 348 comparitor a base line of the two channels is established.
When an alcohol sample is measured the voltage level of the 348 channel will change due to a
loss of the IR energy. This voltage change will also cause a change in the output of the 380,348
comparitor. The comparitor output voltage change is directly proportional to the concentration
ofthe alcohol in the sample chamber. This voltage is then sent to the final comparitor.
INTERFERANT SUBTRACT
The 339 channel is the channel used for monitoring the sample for substances other than alcohol.
As discussed earlier, by selecting two wavelengths a ratio can be established between their
reactivity to alcohol. This is accomplished by "tuning" the 339 channel to work in concert with
the 348 channel. With the 348 channel set to 6.00 Voc,29 the 339 channel is adjusted so when
alcohol is placed into the sample chamber the voltage difference between the two channels
remains constant. For example, if the 348 channel is set at 6.00 V DC and the 339 channel is set at
4.00 VDC there is a voltage difference of 2.00 Voc. This voltage difference is now a constant. If
the voltage of the 348 channel should drop 1.00 volt, making it 5.00 Voc, the 339 should
experience a parallel drop of 1.00 volt, making it 3.00 Voc.
If an interfering substance is introduced along with the alcohol, this parallel balance may be
upset. For example, if an alcohol and acetone vapor is introduced into the chamber and the 348
channel has an output of 5.00 Voc while the 339 channel's output is 2.5 VDC. The difference is
now 2.5 VDC instead of the 2.00 Voc it was set at. This extra voltage difference (0.50 volt) is
detected by the interferant subtract section of the processor. This difference of 0.50 Voc is sent
to the final comparitor where it will automatically be subtracted from the 380, 348 comparitor
result. This system works to detect other substances, such as water, on the sample and
continually adjusts for a "true" alcohol result, which contains no interfering substances. If the
acetone subtract is not properly adjusted, the result will be "acetone" that is not there being
added or subtracted. This can affect the detection and flagging of acetone. If the interferant
28 To avoid confusion here only the three-channel processor will be discussed at this point. The five-channel version should
become self evident by the end if the discussion.
29 Volts DC current

257
detect is not set properly, then samples containing alcohol and any other interfering substance
may not be accurately measured and reported.
INTERFERANT DETECT
All readings receive some type of adjustment, but only ifthere is a significant level of interferant
is the operator notified of such. There is a threshold level for notifying the operator that a
significant level of interferant is present. The interferant detect section of the processor is where
this threshold level is established. The instrument can be adjusted so that when a particular level
of interference is detected the instrument will, through tone and display, notify the operator that
a significant level of interferant was detected and, depending on the software, may have been
subtracted from the final analysis. The key here is that a significant level of interfering
substance has been detected. 30 31 The threshold level is the lowest level that the operator will be
notified at if there is an interferant detected. If the interferant detection flag is not properly
adjusted the device may give false interferant flags or no flags at all when an interferant is
present. Some state programs have recognized the unreliability of subtracting Off an interferant
by assuming that it is acetone and have instead chosen to only flag the interferant and not
attempt to subtract it.
The introduction of wide-band filters in the Intoxilyzer SODDEN yields a much stronger signal
with improved stability. However, the gains in the signal are countered with a loss of sensitivity
to interfering substances. The failure to calibrate the units with any substances other than
ethanol and acetone also limits the interferent detection.
SAMPLE AND HOLD
After rectification, all three channels are fed into a "sample and hold" circuit. If you check the
VDC output at each of the channel test points it will appear to be one continuous voltage level
even though it is not. Energy at each of the channel voltages is only being generated when the
appropriate filter is in line with the detector. The signal being produced is in fact a series of
energy bursts. Even though the signal production is quite rapid, 1800 - 2400 bursts per minute
(optimum values) there are periods of zero energy production. Therefore the three channel
processor incorporates what is called a "sample and hold" circuit.
The sample and hold circuit has the capability of capturing a burst of energy and holding onto it
until the command is given to release that sample and capture another. What appears to be a
constant VDC output at the channel test points is in fact a number of samples of that channel's VDC
30 Testing the system to determine if the interferant flag activates is not the same as testing to see if the system correctly
subtracts the interferant. The accuracy of the subtraction mechanism is determined by testing an acetone and alcohol mixture of
known concentrations. The flagging system is checked by testing an acetone solution of known concentmtion at or above the
threshold level.
31 The interferant flag can be adjusted to any level of sensitivity. States that do their own maintenance and calibration will set
the flag at their own discretion. The manufacturer generally sets the flag at 0.02 mg/mt.

258
output. This allows the instrument to assess any variation in the voltage levels. Consequently,
one could state that the final analysis of a breath/air alcohol sample is composed of 30 separate
analysis per second of sample delivery time.
DIFFERENTIAL VOLTAGE MEASUREMENT, DVM
The DVM is a representation of the combined output of all three channels. This system allows
for visual observation of the stability of the entire processor board. A common
misunderstanding of the DVM is that it is continually monitored and any drifts or fluctuations in
the DVM will result in the device aborting the testing. This simply cannot be, because the
change in the DVM during a sample analysis is directly related to the ethanol reading.
The DVM of the instrument can be displayed through settings on the mode function switches.
During a diagnostic check or the "bird" section of an analysis (the Intoxilyzer screen displays
»»» ...), the instrument is monitoring this voltage level and examining the stability of the
signal. At this time it is determined whether or not the device is within it's proper operational
parameters of 0.020 to 0.600 and if there is any positive or negative drift. Only during a
diagnostic check or the "bird" section immediately prior to a sample analysis is the DVM
monitored for stability.
THE CENTRAL PROCESSING UNIT, CPU

If the Optical Bench is the "heart" of the instrument, then the Central Processing Unit (CPU) is
the "brain". It is here that all of the programmed features are stored and put into action. The
final mathematical computations are performed here and all of the reporting and system control
functions are established, maintained and monitored here. The major components of the CPU
and their function are described below.
The Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory, EPROM chips contain all of the pre-
programmed functions for the instrument. The commands for sequencing, operation and
formatting of the test printouts, all of the data entry questions, the operational parameters and the
mathematical formulas for the final analysis are stored here. The chips are customized to the
specifications of each state program. Displayed and printed messages are part of the state
customization. The EPROMs are occasionally "updated" to reflect changes in state statutes or
changes desired by the agency that maintains the device. The proper operation of the new
programming should be evaluated thoroughly to assure that the modifications requested function
as desired and intended. Complete re-evaluation of all functions is necessary to assure that no
other changes were made in the programming and that the device operates as intended. Newer
Intoxilyzer models have EEPROMs (Electronically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory)
chips in addition to the EPROMs. EEPROMS have the potential of being reprogrammed using
computer communications.
Mary Catherine McMurray Page 14 0(24 March 2006

259
The Microprocessor is responsible for taking the infonnation from the EPROMs and sorting it
into logical sequences. It sends the proper commands to the selected chips, receives incoming
data, and establishes the operational timing base for the other CPU components. The newer
Intoxilyzers are using a faster microprocessor and EPROMs with more programmable memory
are used.
The CPU Crystal establishes the speed of the "thinking" process of the microprocessor. The
higher the frequency of the crystal the faster the microprocessor "thinks".
The Parallel Input Output Device, PIO receives the sequencing command from the
microprocessor and passes these commands on to the proper controllers for their specific
functions. It receives incoming data as to the completion or current status of a task, which is
returned back to the microprocessor.
The Real Time Clock, RTC is the device by which the instrument maintains the time of day
and the date for display and print. In the newer Intoxilyzers (68 series and some upgrades) the
RTC is a Dallas c1ock/calendar/memory/back-up battery package. The battery maintained
memory can store the date the simulator solution was last changed, the name of the operator who
changed it, the number of simulator samples taken and the test results until they are polled (data
is downloaded) by the host computer.
The Random Access Memory, RAM stores data that is transient in nature. It is here that the
time of an event, such as the time of a sample analysis, is held. The CPU RAM will hold this
infonnation until a printout is perfonned. After the instrument prints the results of an analysis
the RAM will clear it's memory amI btl rtlauy lu rtll;tlivtl ntlw infurmaliun. If an inslrumtlnl is stll
up with the telecommunication package, an additional RAM board is installed which will take
the infonnation from the CPU RAM and store data on all tests performed since the last time the
unit was polled via external computer command. (Refer to the section on the ADAMS or
COBRA Systems)
The Analog to Digital Converter, ADC has the task of converting infonnation that is sent in
the form of analog signals, such as the voltage levels and changes from the three-channel
processor, into digital information. It is in essence an interpreter for the different sections of the
instrument permitting each to communicate with the CPU.
The Address and Data Busses The address buss carries instructions and program commands
from the EPROMs, microprocessor, etc. to selected chips that perform the prescribed functions
contained in the program. It is the communications line, which tells, or addresses, these selected
chips. The data buss is the communications line, which collects and carries the data concerning
the status of a particular task, result or event. The information traveling along this buss is
received by the properly selected chip and processed before the next set of instructions is
released onto the address buss.
To put the complex operation of the CPU into sequence keep in mind that there are a number of
commands that must be issued, in sequence;-while--a--crnrstanr-flow-TIf data is lreing-inpurand

260
processed. All of the operating instructions are contained in the long-tenn memory (EPROM).
After accessing the EPROMs, the instructions pass along selected pathways (the address buss) to
another section of the "brain" for processing into a logical order (the microprocessor). After the
instructions have been processed into a logical order, the sequencing commands for the selected
operations are passed on to the proper controHers for their specific functions and information on
the status of the current operation is returned (the data buss) to the microprocessor.
At this point, infonnation is being sent and received and logic "decisions" are being executed.
For example, if there is an interferant present, the infonnation on the amount of interferant to
subtract is relayed on, and if above a set threshold level the interferant flag will need to be
activated. All of these actions, if the analysis is to be completed correctly, depend on a rhythm
being established (CPU crystal). The information being sent from the various components
involved must be interpreted (ADC), so the incoming data can be properly received and
assimilated. The flow of data, commands, processing and interpretation continue until the test
sequence is completed. To ensure that all ofthe procedures were followed correctly and to allow
for the data to be printed on the test card the data concerning the analysis is stored in the short
tenn memory (RAM). Data recall at a later point can be accomplished if there is a
telecommunications package installed to store such data. (Refer to the section on ADAMS or
COBRA Systems.)
ADAMS OR COBRA SYSTEMS
Both the ADAMS and COBRA systems are the CMI programs for data management, allowing
the test results to be downlollded to II PC for record keeping and manllgement. COBRA is a
Windows-based application and the data may be used with a number of data management
programs. ADAMS is CMI's first attempt at creating a database management system. Any
telecommunications require that there be an additional RAM board installed for storing the test
infonnation between pollings. When an instrument is polled, the accumulated data is
downloaded to a personal computer for storage and the RAM is "cleared".
The importance of a data acquisition and management system is that all tests conducted can be
documented. This complete documentation of testing can then be used for analysis of the field
perfonnance of the individual instruments. Database files that can be generated include: subject
test files; error message files; calibration files; diagnostic files and maintenance files.
All of the data for every test can, in theory, be collected however; the data actually collected
depends upon the agency collecting the data. Each state tells CMI what data it wants to collect.
Some states, such as Minnesota, do not collect or download any tests conducted as part of a
servicing at the BCA lab. Only data from tests conducted "in the field" are downloaded. From a
scientific perspective, this is not advisable. The purpose of collecting data should be to establish
the working history of the device and allow for complete troubleshooting of the operation of the
device.

261
The data actually reported in discovery requests depends in the integrity of the agency handling
the data. Wisconsin data is sorted so that only subject data from evidential tests are reported
unless specifically asked to include all the data. Arizona has written into the software a
procedure that allows the results of tests that the technician/operator does not like to be omitted
from the database. Minnesota has special function keys that allow tests to be conducted that are
not stored in the computer memory. When dealing with computer data, always remember that all
tests reported is not the same as all tests conducted.
System Circuit Descriptions Additional information for 68 series
Functional Switch Board Assem bly The functional switch board serve three main
functions: data entry for both time and date if a keyboard is not available, type of test selection
(e.g. subject test, cal check, etc.) and test characteristics (e.g. three digits, print inhibit, etc.). The
board consists of 5 individual slide switches and a bank of 8 DIPswitches. The slide switches to
either 5 volts or ground depending on the switch while the DIPswitches only switch to ground.
The resistors on the board are used for pull-ups on the switches that connect to ground. The
switch outputs and the pull-up resistors are connected off board.
Communication Board Assembly The communication board assembly provides an

electronic connection between the Intoxilyzer and external electronic instruments. The external
connections provide are: serial communications at 300, 1200 and 2400 baud rates (factor preset),
external keyboard connection of either IBM or membrane varieties, and an optional parallel
printer port for an extcrnal Ccntronix compatible printer if an internal printer is not present.
Internal Printer Board Assembly
Controller Board Assembly The controller board assembly is the home of the slave
microcontroller that handle all signals retrieved from the IR optical bench. The functions of the
controller board are: toggling the sample and hold pulses used on the analog processor board,
communicating infonnation retrieved from the optical bench to the host CPU subsystem,
maintaining calibration infonnation which is stored on the analog processor board, writing to the
DAC on the analog processor board, and reading from the A to D converter on the analog
processor board.
The slave processor is an 8-bit micro controller (8051 AH). The slave processor is the brain
behind all the functions of the optical bench. The 8051's subystem consists of separate ROM
and RAM chips as well as communication chips. The slave maintains the operations of the
optical bench while waiting or information request from the host processor. The program for the
slave processor is stored on a 64K byte EPROM and there is a "scratch pad" memory in the form
of an 8K x 8 bit static RAM chip. The 8051 normally has only 256 bytes of RAM space that is
not sufficient to handle all of the computations and variables necessary. The external static
RAM chip is treated as an external peripheral chip as it is attached directly to the subsystems

262
address/data bus. Both temporary variables as well as the working calibration information are
stored in the external RAM for easy access by the micro controller.
Analog Processor Board Assembly The analog processor board assembly is where the
signals from the cooled detector are converted into a digital format, which can be read by the
controller assembly. The analog processor board handles all support functions (cooler control
circuitry, regulator, eeprom, etc.) required to meet the end task.
CPU Board Assembly
Mother Board Assembly
Sample Chamber
Diameter = 0.745"
Length = 11 9/16"
Volume = 82.2 ml
Temperature = 47 ± 5.0°C (generally will fluctuate less than ± 0.5°C)
IRSOURCE
Quartz iodide FCS projection lamp with reflective back coating
Lenses
Poly IR 5 fresnel, 0.065" thick
Filters
May be wide band or narrow band filters.
Infrared wavelengths
3.80,3.52, 3.47, 3.40, 3.36 microns
Detector
Lead selenide element electronically cooled to ~ooc. The newer detectors can be refurbished.
Internal tubing
3/8" ID
Reading updates
Alcohol measurement is updated approximately every 250msec. Each update is based upon 30
rotations of the filter-wheel, which turns at 40 revolutions per second.
Sample adequacy
A breath flow of 0.17 Lisee is required to initiate a measurement; O.15L1sec must be maintained
after that. A minimum volume of 1.1 liters of breath must be provided and the rate of change of
alcohol concentration must stabilize for the sample to be accepted as adequate.

263
INTERNAL DIAGNOSTICS
PROM CHECK - Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory is checked to obtain a checksum
that must match that contained in the instructions.
RAM CHECK - Random Access Memory is set to zero and checked to ensure it is zeroed.
TEMP CHECK - Sample cell temperature is checked, must be 47°C ± SoC.
PROCESSOR CHECK - Filter wheel motor, EEPROM programming, serial number,
range/stability and auto cal status of the processor board are all checked.
PRINTER CHECK - The printer is checked to verify that there are no errors.
RTC CHECK - The real time clock and calendar is checked.
INTERNAL STANDARD CHECK - The calibration of the measuring system is checked with
an internal routine.
SIMULATOR CHECK - The simulator temperature and error status is checked.

THE INTOXILYZER EVOLUTION
5000
64-00 and 66-00 68-00 68-01
Identified in the Federal Identified in the Federal Identified in the Federal

Register as: 5000,5000 Register as: SOOOCD, Register as:
w/cal vapor re-circulation, SOOOCD/FGS SOOOEN
5000 w/3/8" ID hose
option, 5000VA
Dimensions 18" x 18" x6" 18"x18"x6" 18.75" x 17.35" x 5.75"
Test card 4" wide multi-ply 4" wide multi-ply, external printer optional 4" wide multi-ply, external printer
optional
Detector Warm, lead selenide Thennoelectrically-cooled, lead selenide. Thennoelectrically-cooled, lead N

The detector is electronically cooled to O·C. selenide. The detector is c::1"I
.a;;.
electronically cooled to O·C.
Filters 3 filters 5 filters, state may request 3 5 filters, state may request 3
3.80,3.48,3.39 j.IIll (microns) 3.80,3.52,3.47,3.40,3.36 J.llI1 (microns) 3.80,3.52,3.47,3.40,3.36 j.IIll

(microns) Started using wide band
filters in 2000
Sample chamber, vol. 81.4 ml 81.4 ml 82.2 ml
Minimum detection 0.02 g/210L 0.01 g/210L 0.01 g/210L
IR source Quartz iodide projection lamp with a Same as earlier models Same as earlier models
reflective back coating.

Photo Interrupter One interrupter that looks at the Two -- one interrupter looks at the filters, Two - one interrupter looks at the
complete loop, thus establishing the while the other looks at the complete loop. filters, while the other looks at the
basic timing for the signals. The two interrupters synchronize the complete loop. Two interrupters
separation of the signals for each synchronize the separation ofthe
wavelength. signals for each wavelength.
Monitor breath volume No Yes, unless opted for pressure switch. A Yes, unless opted for pressure
transducer is used to measure the volume in switch. A transducer is used to
liters. Check valves at the enny to and exit measure the volume in liters. Check
from the sample chamber prevent backward valves at the enny to and exit from
flow, thus preventing a subject from the sample chamber prevent
"sucking back" and diluting the sample. backward flow, thus preventing a
subject from "sucking back" and
diluting the sample.
I Internal Tubing 1/4" ill 1/4" ill 3/8" ill used to reduce the
opposition to air flow
N
Q\
Microprocessor Z80 Multiprocessor system with the slave Multiprocessor system with the slave Ut
microprocessor dedicated to the instrument's microprocessor dedicated to the
analytical tasks. instrument's analytical tasks.
Sample chamber 45° :t5°C 45° :t5°C 47°:t 5°C

temperature
Ghost readings (false positive alcohol Ghost readings (false positive alcohol The sample chamber is constructed
readings) have been reported for readings) have been reported for sample ofthinner tubing than in earlier
sample chamber temperatures of less chamber temperatures of less than 47°C. models. The thinner mass warms to
than 47"C. the 2-degree higher temperature
quicker than in earlier models.
Barometric pressure No Yes, if dry gas is used as a calibration Yes, if dry gas is used as a
measurement verification medium, a barometric pressure calibration verification medium, a
sensor is included to provide automatic barometric pressure sensor is
correction for barometric pressure. included to provide automatic
correction for barometric pressure.

Monitors for alveolar Time, pressure, slope Volume, time and slope Volume, time and slope
air, aka deep lung air,
end-expiratory air The pressure switch was the only There is a flow sensor, aka a thermistor (a Same as for the 68-00.
choice with these early models. The temperature dependant resistor), that, when
minimum pressure needed to activate calibrated, makes it possible to measure the
the tone is 6" water pressure. The flow of air (in liters per second) as a sample
tone must be kept on throughout the is being provided. The total volume of the
entire exhalation (minimum time 4-6 expired breath may be measured (liters/sec
seconds) and the alcohol multiplied by seconds = liters).
concentrations must be leveling off.
A plateau, or leveling off of the slope A minimum breath flow of 0.17 Usee is
is defined as no more than a +0.002 required to initiate the tone, 0.15 Usee must
or -0.001 on three consecutive pairs be maintained to keep the tone on. 1.1 liters
of readings. of air is needed before slope is considered.
Slope requirements are the same as for the
earlier models. A flow sensor is necessary
for using dry gas standards.
As an option, a state could request that the

N
device be retrofitted with a pressure switch. 0'\
No volume measurement is capable with 0'\
pressure switches. Dry gas is not an option
for pressure switch devices.
Calibration standards Wet bath simulator Wet bath simulator or dry gas Wet bath simulator or dry gas

Calibration process Manual, analog Computerized, digital Computerized, digital
Variable potentiometers, aka trim The computerized calibration process stores Same as 68-00
pots, are resistors that can be adjusted alI of the calibration in a digital manner.
manually with a small screwdriver to The drifting of channel voltages that
vary the resistance. Each of the previously occurred with the earlier models
channel voltages, the DVM and the is not as likely to occur with the 68 series.
Vrerl2 are manipulated with dedicated
trim pots.
The calibration information is stored

as analog information and
periodicalIy the voltages may need to
be manually adjusted via the trim
pots.
Voltage drift is why voltages need to

be re-adjusted by the state
technicians. Calibration will drift as N
the voltages drift.
I ="
-J
! Shared path and entry into sample Shared path and entry into sample chamber Breath path and calibration path are
I
I
chamber two separate paths that enter the
Breath path and sample chamber at two separate
calibration path points. By separating the breath
and calibration paths there is no
3-way valve in the breath path
making it easier to provide a
sample into the sample chamber.
The separation of the two paths
necessitates added quality
assurance measures to establish
that the sample will read the same
on both paths.

INTERNAL DIAGNOSTICS:
EPROM check - erasable programmable read only memory is checked to obtain a checkswn that must match that contained in the instructions.
RAM check - random access memory is set to zero and checked to ensure it is zeroed.
TEMP check - sample chamber temperature is checked, must be within sac of the set point.
PROCESSOR check - the filter wheel motor, EEPROM programming, serial nwnber, range and stability and auto cal status of the processor board are all
checked.
PRINTER check - the printer is checked to verify that it is on and attached.
RTC check - real time clock/calendar is checked.
INTERNAL STANDARD check - the light transmitted thru each of the channel filters is utilized to monitor the electronic stability of the signals. The
internals are "set" in the calibration process to read as if they were various alcohol concentrations, thus the name "internal standards".
Sources:
Wisconsin Breath Alcohol Testing Update, 1994;
Minnesota Model Intoxilyzer 5000 series 68, 1998 and updates
CMI sales literature, 2000 N
0\
QO
Demystfying the Intoxilyzer by MC McMurray

269
EXHIBIT D - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

Diagnostic Test Results
(pp. 269-270)
REPRODUCED FOLLOWD'JG
270
2Et peT
:t~X;mY:~B~ - ALCOJiOL ANALY~BR
MODEli, 5000EN SN 68-011198
12l03/2011
D~OSTIC ~ST 1'1: 08 EST

PROM; CHECK' ~ABSED
,zeo VER - (3:1776 ..12
SLAVE 7S rz240
~ cHECK - PASSED
TEMP CHECK PASSED
PROCESSOR CHECK
MOTOR ,CHECK PASs:rm
EEPROM, CHECK PASSED
SERIAL 'NO.MA'POff; PASSED
RANGE/STABIr..tt:n pASSED.
AUTO CAL STATUS pAsSED'
RTe CHECK PASS;BD

INTERNAL STD: PASSED
DlAGNOSTIC PAsSlro
PRnlTl!lRCHBCK
ABCDBFGHIJl<LMNOEORSTt1V'9tlYZ
0:(23456789
271
EXHIBIT E - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

Calibration Check Printout Sheet
(pp.271-272)
272
29 PCT
INTOX!LY~ '" ALCOHOL ANALYZER
MODEL ,sOODEn ' SN; 6~"O:1,1i98
12/03/;2011
'l'ES'r "BrAe TIME

AIRB~ .00,0 11:I5BST
CAL •. caaCK .098 11 :,1588'1'
AIR·~ .000 11:1SES'.J.'
cAL. CHECK .'098 11: 16E8'1'
AlR BLANK .000 l,1:16BS'1'
C1t.L, CHECK .·099 11:16EST
AIR BIJ\NI( .000 11: 16EST
NO. Ol!' SAMPLES: 03
M:EAN.~ ;'0983
S'l'D • DEV1'ATION~ .0005742
273
EXHIBIT F - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

NYPD Field Unit Inspection Report
(pp.273-274)
274
POLICE LABORATORY
FIELD UNIT
INSPECllON REPORT
Insth,lment _JA,INT~0XI~LIo!.·YZ~E,/I:R~5!J<OOO~·oU=EN;.l..L_~~ .........._ Date ofInSpectioo _..l./_2.,,",,/:...3_

.. ':-/_'1_'__
Location 2<6 P,c{ ......... ~
I.atoxil~zerSeriat# (~,;.. OI/Li7Y ,Simulato~Serial #'~ '11'1'1

1. ,lOCI
2.. ",b?l
l. ,10t;/
.Diagnostic test _o_..;,.k--,. _
B~th' tube I)~~ oN;,.
-------
'PriD!1t ~beCk ,d<..
---------
'lhtoxilyzer seriili # (1;- ol./J'fg $im~Iator Serial
., #0((2 rr~7.
, ..
Lot'# . . .'
/IIYO
-.:......:-_-----
1. ..o7~
2. ,o,~
l. -<:lli
Diagnostio test_CD..;,."_,\<. _
BreatMubo bealed' oIL
l"riilterebeclc _0_['
.....
,
-------_
ReIDlU'ks -
po /lilA V
20.f2 Ral\lll NiIIlIC JSiJPl~tul';
. ,_. __Techni!?J1 ~l!ervlsor
<::riminarr~iC3 FOrm'7 (Revision No. 11-01. Dal" Eff'ectiw.:0Sl29jll.1'8~2 0(2, ISsiJingAulhority.: Dirr,<:ton'DcpUly'Dirtclor)
275
EXHIBIT G - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

NYPD Field Unit Inspection Report
(pp. 275-276)
276
POLICE LABORATORY
FIELD UNIT
INSPECTION REPORT
InstrUment _MINTol.;·uQ"XILl>J,bt.Y,.t.;ZE::l·:=!.!R~5"",O~OO~E:A-N:... l ..J3/:;../;....;I

,Date ofInspection _1..;.;/;2e-.. _
LoCl1tiOn 2--:..~__=_f_c-=-T_· ........... _
lntoxilyzeiSerial # be~ aHtjg SimuMor Serial # f)/L17S- 7 Lot#....:/J_0_r?;_YcJ._·. _

1. ",{(.!L
2. _101
3. . ,,!d!
Piagnostia.t~t...;O:;...,.l.;('-::...;-_~ _
~renth tube.heated _of-'-'- ~_
_ _~~
Pritlter cbeck.--:.o..;.l'- _
Int9~il)'Zer ·Serial # (f--vI {l17 tf Smn~Iato.r Seriai # (}A 1ft ry Lot # -:.!J..;.,.'1...:./fc_·~ .-...-.
1. ... 62f
2. .,&21'
3; .. o'l~
Di4gtlOstic test _o--,(.,,-,~ -,--__
Breath :lube heated....;c1.:...L:l>< ...,....._ _
PriJitttr: aheck_O-,!,-<"'_~ _ _-",_ _
Page 2 of2 Rank ( NllSI\C f SigttllllUt'

Technical Supervisor
~riminalislics fotm 57 (Revision No. ) /-01, Inte ElTectivc. 08/29/1 i, Page 2 of2, Issuing Authority: DirrclOriOepuly Director)
277
EXHIBIT H - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

NYPD Calibration Report, Dated December 3,2011
(pp.277-278)
278
Receiued: May 16 2012 03:10p~
POIJ~ LAPORAlORY
CAUBRATION REPORT
RECORD OF lNTOXlLYZBR 5000EN CALI,BllAnON
I:':2.1 /1,1 Iaw(~'O!TI7'7 I$~'iu;' 'I &J7Wo

3
w,WJ
. I:r~fCf I
Breatb Tube Heated;..:::(J~I<. _ Invalid S~JEf .at ,
!D$ufficient Sample g]L..<...:....-- _ Int~t o~;;e:f.l.er.Ql &(~ Ac.eta>".(...
R~-2.f~S_~~----_ Invalid Test _0::-..;..;1"::.- _
Jteset.,;;;.o......~"-. '-- _ Print Test_O_-f;...<... _
~~rn~~_o_K~._~------
Genet'8l COllditiCiU_G-.:>
__ ""_d'-- _
CA,LJ)JRAnON TESTS
L r/d 2..
2. r /0 I
3. _lO2.. _
4. ,,107-
S. - {tJZ-
Rebiril.lJ\sttuxJ)ent toPmpa T6St Mode ..!.~_·.;:.:.:..::-'1~ 1nidaJsLJf;~'I/ _

Commeut&_...o....- ~
P~e2of.2 lh.nk I !lime I Slgnal,'1re

T't:Chnl~1 SUpeTvillOr
CrimmallMite F6nn S6 (RcviJion No. 11.01, Dale fitr. 08n.9fll,'hge 1 0'1. hPllni Alllhorlty: ~ Dinx:lDr)
279
EXHIBIT I - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

Police Department Certification Of Records By Gamil Hanna
(pp. 279-280)
Received:
280
Sep 24 2012 10;'23~
POLlCE DEPA RTMENT
CERT:fFTED PHOTOSTATIC COpy

OF CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRAnON
(CPLR RULE 4518)
I, Gamil Hanna ~Tochnical Supervisor, Intoxicated Drivers Testing Unit,

New York Ci~ Police Laboratory, l:SQ.-14 Jamaita Avenue, Queens, New York 11432-
3725, do hereby certify and authenticate as provided by Rule 4518, subdiVision C, Civil
Practice taw ~nd Rules, tbat the copy annexed hereto is an exact photocopy of the
original record of the New York City Police LaboraJ.ory which has been delegated to my
possession, custody and control, by the Director of the New York City Pottee Laboratory.
T fut:ther certify that the original record of calibration Of Intoxilyzer SOOOEN, Serial
Number 68~012478 perfonncdon Noyember 16. 2010 by Adrian Arav
Technical Supetvisor, Intoxicated Drivers Testoog Unit~ of which the co,py annexed is a
photocopy, was made in the regula\' courso of busincs$ of the New York City P()lice
Laboratory, and that it was the .regUlar course of New Yolk City Police Laboratory
business to make such record at tbe ti.tnc of each event recorded in it or within a
reasonable time thereafter.
N"""o'-'-VeIIl=b::.;:eT":.:......:.;18=,.;,.:::2=O::..;:1o,---_~---'-,
. _..... (9) -"
Intoxicated Drivers Testing Unit
"
New York City Police Laboratory
COURTESY • PROFESSIONALISM • RESPECT

281
EXHIBIT J - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

Intoxilyzer 5000 Operator's Manual
(pp.281-313)
282
"
','
( ..
. "
*. .0'
. . .
, '," '. ',Customized Optrons' "

, , "Ma,nlial
, " " '
, , , . '
. "
.. . . . . , . " . .. .
,
.
'INTODLriER<B?
. ~
' .. .. . , ,
"
"
':,:tiO,'OOEN: " . .
.:.. . .
, . .. ,
..
. '
. , 'Breath
. -. Alcohol,
. ' ..' ~.
, ': ,:' .: Testing. Instrument

• • ' . ' . 0° . '
, "
. " "
•• ° 0 ".
,"' .. .,
, '.
. ' , \
'"
" .
. .. ..
~ ..
. .'
,
,
:,':" :..
I , .. • • .. 77'M'lVA . . i
. ..
-
=:.
-- ':,.=- ..
PIN 65Q224 . . ,
I
\,;
'. '.
283
.. .. ' '. . . ( . .. " :..'
.\
' .. , '. '.~" .
.. . . , '. . ~ ,"
..... ", ~,,: "

.... ~: ' "
· '.
. " .. ~
.'. .
.. ., I.
-t,. ' ~.
.' ".
~ ,. .'
..~ , • i • ,.J..". ". ";;;..... . . '. . . "'" ". ""i .. '
·:1· :: : .<. : ; .' .......:.,,' ,... , .... .'~ ".:. :.... '..'. "/ "'., '
<.: .: -. >. ~.::
:o' • . • '
. ··f·"
~:: . • •
".: •••::.: .......:.:~':
,.f" '.' ./
..': .. .
•.•
:. '
...".;.
'. ','"
.: :.
'"
('
11 ..... : • • • • • •: :: .. ,,,: w• • l~ ~':' ' : ' , •• .... : <.....:
••• : • • .:',;J':' ,'''' . . . ',: :,~::,,'. ,., . 1.'0'"
· -- •.. ' :..... ~ ;. :.. ,; ..... :;.1 .t. . .•... "., ".~ ':,t ••:.:.·.... "'" _.•
.:t.:; .
0' ; •••
\: : •••••••• : ' ,. ;:{'•• " . , •••••:: ,.' '.' •••• : .·t•• ·:.,• •:-::••••• : .'.:~ '" .'. :,.:,:•• :.:,.: ,.:' ':~'. ' ••••• :",
·.r/~<.:.
I (,'• • ,"I. "
:,: ;,; I~... ;~ ......>.::.,/ .:.:.:.<'~', . ':.:.~~~.~~. ~.~~;O.~.~~~~~ ,> 1'::>" .':">'.:. :'::>'. :"'~'~./~:<'. 'f:"'~:' .
• '. t •. At.CQHOLANJ?~.fJQMA~B.eDY
•.;.t•• II ••••••~ ,.,t~.."..- ,•• ~ .._ ,; 1\..flIh " ri " .. ~ ,""••ilh, .
•••• '., ...:~.,... • ..., ' , ••.•• : •• : ...... ~ .... :".. •••••••• ' . •" . : . ,• • ' :' . • • • • • ". .: " • • '" ~.t••• ~. ," •• '-
, 1.··. . .' .• ,4ll$0llIJl0'rl •.,; -: ":':'"-::'~'':''''''''' ,., : :'.; : :..: :"'\' ·t· :. :"!':'~'''' :;.';\"''/:'' ~.;.:-: ~., .
. ' •• • j, DI$l'J.IQl1J'1()?t1••••, ., ,••, : ••••• ,I • • ·.:·.~.,"' ~ •••• •••• t••t • .;# J.,·••'..·•• f'.'Y •••• ,,·,... ·• •••• w. J
• •• ' .' '..: . : ' " """' ...."l. • " " •• ' • •" , • •••• • •
:·.: :.: ".:. '3'. .-.
•••• . . '
:."Uil..""".,. •••••M:.:" .·,· ;:t.··i' '. .. •• '
·
_,,: , .. ..'
... •• '. • .'
.
.:
.'.
'•• I:J~' •..,"
u .......", r
.~T'. 'B'~'"
,
!.:.•,~')t:"'.::
: I I,,-:.:::.: ,~
~ .•::
,
,
•
t
:, .:..\.,
.
;
: ,.,I4:~ :-::::
. •
:.~
'.. .
: :..::; ~ ..~ :.'." ..:··..··:,:····:'Y:::1·t..••". '1. :. '.. :.
....,
~.~.M
....' •
~
,;:
.'
1 • Jt "1' ~O. IJlA.m~uRClt...~11O••·

t\t'leO\.llLAIl. S~L1f (DiB..·LltHG a-'J\1l()
J.,· ;
I ::U.::.:.•::.:
· ..,..,.· / ,:'u,
u.~;,..'u...:
,
:
"
" : : *••: :.,.,,:•••••_· :,.4 . "

..,.."', ", _
·t"'; ::.>~ .\ ~ :.\.. :.~ "',. , ;. ~;.::.:.:;:: . li·'::;.'':';r.;:..\''..:: :..:.:

.:
•
..... t . : . :
~ _. .~
/.....
• •* '\. At.~eo~1t?H qU1\V1t ••••-

:..; :.\:·,,· :·..}~..~;
."l. h
:·:..:..:::·;··~::::·f~:· . :~·::· ..:.,::··:·t
U .t..tl.t I.,. , ••t ,
:.. ::; , .:. .....
:.~ '.
....: J
. o,-Rist.n.T$.. .
: : ,_;."/'..' . ' ;'.''1~4no," '~'. #:.:':~: : '~
. . . . . , . . . . .' . ;. .
: :.:" :.~ t 'f ~•• t..: ~ ~--: '••~.l~ •••:;: : ,
..
:.::.1':." ,•• tt t' .' ~
: .
,!~. '. : .~ ~ ':;\; . '!- O~~c.~~~ • 7 '..I:' ~ ....~ ·.~._ ~':, ,ll.:~..:_: : I :/lt:~ :u ~ u :::.:.:.""~: ••:-.:.· ~: ; ..\ . : : : .. !
•, . . . . '" lIri'DXleAllOtl_ • 6 ,• _ , _..· ·M _ , , " , , ..
... 't":: :..' : ~': . ~ ~,.... '';.'. ~ , ..' ':",': ~ ' ~: : .:., '" ::. . : ..:.:'.' . ~ ~ ~~! # ':."
'. ~ . : ':::" :~. J\Bqvr:nm.~STRt1I~l'i1:.·.""· ....~. .'··7.:"..· !"h.. ".:=u ":.•. ,l.~~ ~: :'l.._.::•.- ~~ ...~"~....~.~.:"'h.~ ..1:.".._ 8. '. .......... : . . ..
". _. ,.~".
.,'.: ':. .:;.. •. . "p'A":_:"k""";O'",,:•.. ~
~l.."""""u-r. _J""~"l1r- ..··.1., ~'~.P""_ .••••• ~ :..,•• '*{~ ~ ~., I .. ~ ••• • ,.·.·..: ·:••·••, ~••· '..•• ~ ••, .••:.: ~ :.:.
8 ~ :..:
~ ~ ..
..u , .•. '. ' . •. '.
•.\ ••.
••••, . . .
··:.,.··."••••••••
I • ',: : •••••• :. .,..
" j • • • • .,' • '.... • .. i,' r:,:" .... ' '."..

.• <". ':"', '.~' , •• ··0 . " ~ . < o' '. , : ., t. ~ ~ , .~ '. ;,. .' , ••
. ' .::. ". ... :'." ~~wJ!:R.r~~~.r:~/l"~'.~.:~.". ;;. '"~ ..:..... r.~~I: . . ~ ....:tfJ:~: ...:.. ~~. N
..:.~'" ~.~~'~..... t . ., I....:':~~:~. ::~. .,....:::~~.::, .....~ l .4' ....
·.,I.." •'~'...... .~. '. 06'1'=f'DrfO 'It!A.D'tl'O' PO\llJ.tl1:,'U'P'..:ntE' INQ1t~ _I.u,•• ; :n•• n
.
. ., " . ...'. ,... ...... : . '
'. PO'I{\\MIQ 0/. ~ 'DIAatIOSTtO.~ Sl!Q\JliH(;Jj _ ,
,
t': _ ~'...
. , #u •••• :.:
,., :
. . . h.".:•. h';~"''''.'lt.:
. , .. ; ~.'•..: ..:.. y9:: /t1 .•
.
r..
I' ''-. .' e, . ". . ~ . ;OlA~b$'T'Jci . ,.., ~."' ~. :.~ :u::.: ;

··.r . :..'l, ':."::,,: ..~
\::~ :~~
~ .. ,.. : : :
} :.-. :~ :.:.L:
,',
-:.:•.:,•.,:••I-:.• _.;·:~ ,
~ :.4 .
:~·••;, u .. :·••• IO· : :
.{
'# • .'. _ :.:.:: :.::." .. I' : " • •
'Il .'.' :. .TftE.l<!nOAJm _ ~t- """._ " " t,,,.~ ul:;.."' to , t" " II, ~ \ .. ...,.~.~ • ." .. ,;..3&· . .
~ .. ~~ ;;.. ,.·.·.·;i. : .. : : . :~ .. , . :~ l.... ':". '.'; ' 1 :.' :1.. ,'. ~.:~.':'" ", .
.. KJ!Y'l-OA:luJo'Q'mONs.MItftJ 1 •• 11 , •• . . 1 "·'..i , •••• ""! \•••• :~.'''., .,. "'.'\l••,.,1 .,.,.".".•••••• _.I)
:1···
:. ... '.' ·,.
.";
~ .
.. : .
.. ...\" '
I:.·..· . '
. .,
. '. :,.: ....
.. :....
.
" :; . ,'. .
•
.. :.,. .'. .. "

.. ., I' ~
'
•
......
,
..... .
. .. .. ~.'
t...• '• . 'J
.. .. ....
, :~.> •••
....
·. . .'
. '. '
.'.... '."
It .......
:.. ' ~. STANDBY j\1"0pt
:::,~ I. ~ • .:• .1 .' '.': .j'. ..
I " }."' •• w~.t
. ~ .." ' • I
;.•• :
'. I
~ 1·.. I:.\
~
!
:
I.".,••.•••••_
.. • • " • • 1,
~ •.•...•••••: ••.••••••••• ~.~
: • ': • '. : I • ••
_·••• t •••••••·,.·•.~~ • '
,......... o.
'.' "":.: :DISPLAY;MESSAGES'~'ND COMMANDS .:..;.....:..~."~: ..:.....:..;.•:...:;._: :..;.. :.:.:.:.:.;~.,:.:,::...:; ....... ;1...\;... 15· .;.
," ' ".. ;'" <.:: .'.\ t·.:: ;.'(-'.:': ;.. ::
. " ..,. . qtl$TOM~~E;D·Di\1'A.~r:x:a~.:; ,.:
: . :' <. ~ ,':' :.{.:
:.; ".; :.. :.",.,.~
. ":.:'
~ :
'
:~ :
: .. ,"~.,.>:,.:.; .. '.':
::,.; ~:._.j!8·, ....
':.~. .o~. , ~.:~ ·:-i· .~ :.: ..."':" ..':, :" ..~: ..:."" :. ",,'. . .: : ". ,; ,:.: .. '.:' '.' ..' :,'. ~" ~ :. ..,. ,:.. ~ ~ f ..
.' :
..: ••••.: t. PRINTED QUTPUT .'.'111'•••••••••••• , .' \. : ' ••• ' I " tt., ~" •• ,.t.,,I' , , ••• 29,
., ":.'J:'~ .. :;<..:~ ",:.. ' : ' . ':.;:., '.~.: :~ '.,
.' ~ ..
,
•• ' ••• ',. " ' •• >" ."' •• " t··
", . '. . ~..
.. ,.
... " .... ,
I"
j' •
.'
."
t·, "
: .. .::."
.. '."
..iii ~50ii4" .
.; 't. • :' ,
., .•...
• J , .1
'.:n·ev. 11./98 .
.... . . ~ '.' lt~. S·.,
. .. '. .
I. , '
'. • \' ,J
" . . ",'., ,', . " ,:

',:; ". :' : .:~
'.' .... ... '~~ , '
.' " . '"

284
.\, .: "
" , , ,. "
.' .. "
-.. -~ .. ' .. '
, '"
"
"~,
I' ... , "

';,
' ..
....
"
,--:;'. ,<~....
:. "
','
,i'
....
"
':: '. ,", ~ ,
' ~ . " '
.. ./ " '
...... ..,
," ~. .'
'
,., f
,
~ '.,
" , ,
'
( , ' " ,
."• 0' ..." ",:. .... ;.
I .~ '"
......
•
"
., ," .
,
~
"J'
"
to'
,
"
I
~ .:.
" "
..... " ,
.... , ",
.. '
"
I
" '\
' ...
"
"
,
'f...".' . '.
,
, "
, "
.:.
,',
" '. ,', ..

" • 't"-
, , <, ° 0 , ,'""
,', " '

,',
"
t •••
' .. t"
o' .•
.... "
, '
': .:
~ ~.
"."'." '
...
"
. ~,'
.
. .,.
.: .. .....,. . '
",
'":... " .
"
" f.,' , "
'
.....
'1/ ;,t
'w' '
"
.. :' to
, " .
•• .. f.
., .:;' 0, ••
'" 0' : of
t .,', :,', ,,','

• ".:." ... : " ..
" ., "
" " . ;. ~ ;t ': : 0.: " " ,",
..." :.':
'
'
,~. .,
0° .... •
~
•• ~ ~
. "
. "j.o "
"
,1 0 "
.:.. '. ~. : ' " ' 0' .' •• °0 ; ..... ~.

" , ,"
I' 0'"
"
, '
.. -,'r
",
" , ,'\.
',' ", "

.....
" .....
"
., .. ~ '
I ••
','
.' .°. 0 .' ':"

.,' '"
" . "
," ',
"
,-
" " .:., ,"
, , '
" ,r'
" ;
, .
,',
"
, ,. .t', ." ~
285
," ..
".:."". " :,',
. i :" .....
" ,
of. '\ .....
" . ,
..
"
.~.
of "
. ..',
: ~ : ..!
: I •
,t, ••
. '
'\"
,
;','.
" ,
.~. = "
... " .. :. 0'. .. ..: ... : ••

.... :~. -,' . "
.~".,.... ','
" ....'"t.
... '.\,.,
'. ;:
" .' "'''', . :'
~., ,',' ...' ,',', ::.;.. '::~':,I '.'
"
• ,0 • •
. ... ,',
:. . .... • ." .;
. ": • >'; ..'\ .~ -: ~~.:

# '. ..
-.:".'.
,.
',.
< ":" •
.. . ."" . ';. ..... ..... ~. ~.":~ ... ,

:~ ,,' , ,;:: ' .
, '
. ..
:.. ••••• ..
," .. . ... .. '. '. .

..' I ..... :.: " . : ",
.: " . :. :,
..:,,-,.. 0.'
"
.'"
'._:"
'
',_
" ,',
.:~~ ....:". '; ....... ",,, .. '
.
... • ::• • , ' J
'. " ~: t·"
." "f
" .. : :. . . . .-; • ',.' "0.
' " '."
.. .' .-' .....
'
.',
;./ f
.,
:
;.
.,
.. -. ;.: .": ..
....f' '..
•
•
I.
.. '," <":.,.•
;.",
0,
. . ,
"
...
"
Of '\.
'. ". , ,. ....

,
....
'
Of
/. ..
: . • •• 1.. . . . , ,
• ~: .. 0'
I. :,
:. " "
f" "
" ,
.....
..... Of ..
..
'. ' . ~ ..
~. I
"
... ' "

"
.. ,' .. '. ,- .
.. "
.,' .. ....... ",
286
.
'" ~ : .... : .' " ,," .,'" , .. .' .
~ ~."
", • I
287
:. ," . ...." . ... . .. :'.,
~ .' ~ ' . .;
.' '
,.
. ...
'
.
;
. '.'
" .
"
288
... .. ~ . .
,
. t·.
..
'
289
.. '
'.
" .
., ' . .~ ..
.. :. .' :'. ':

..
~ " ',' . ':" ' ; ••" .'.:" •
.',: '. :~~ :",:' . <.~ ••
• .''::.: 'I ......
'. ':'.
_.j
.. .. '.'.
'
1~ ••
' . :", 1 :•• ' . ' , .".~", • • • : .. ~:~ ,:' ::. ~." ")': .. ,'0 : ' ' .•.••
• '. • : .' :", "'0. .' " .. ,,~:, •• ' : ' : ' ",- ," . ,". ",::.' :
........ '::.:' ' . .:.~ ': .'. ;. '.: : ..:.: ":;" ~'. ',.: :
6 • : '.. ':'" '. • I' • I' .' , ,i' ::' t·
~'. ~
.::
• ~ . ' . .
t'..
" "
" • • .'.' •
:....•.••.:.._~. : :: : 00:, ':. "
:.:.:.•.• :....
/"
• '.
••
• -:'.;'
"
:'./-.:', -~~~ : :: :,
l~. '. ::.
•
'.: ...:
.'
.'"
"
._~ ~
" .. ' .'. ,,'.
.. .,.' '.... .
:.~ ~
. .>:,,"
.-
"
.
• •
.
.' ' ••: • :...
,"
::..;"
.... , .
'. ,": .'
. :.....
:." • :';•
<\: ..: .... ':.~~;.

., • 0- 0."'
.',',".,
•
.~:' ~.
.:"~., .".
:{: :': I . ' .'.:: •..• . :.. . . ".' •
" . " (.':: ' ,.' '.. . '.' .. ,.
290 :. :, . '0
1
:• •' ••
.' f ~•
. ' ..
_t'
.. , .. " '
.: .
','
"
,"
t ,
.. ." ...
~
...
)'
"
• I
"
'. '. , , "
'"',4 •
"
. 0 , .....
,-
,,'
",
.' ~ ... ; ".. '
. ' ... .. ,
J,
.. "
...., . "
: "'.
,
.. .....': ~: .' ~ . , .. l ..
. .'
...... ;"
....".,
:.;
o ". ..
•: • 't.
," .... ,"
:,' .:."
..
I· '.~: '. ';',
.....
' ...
" ". .~" ",
J "
.....
..... ... :.;' '.',::'
. .;
'."
..... :
.'1 • .' .. :~ ",

;. ' ....
,"; ;. j :.
". , I" ,'.,
.:: ..
. ~'.
..
,;.' " '"/.,,,
.: .,:' ... :
291
. ..' .' .~ .. ,,,;'. " '" '.<. .." , .....
.. ~ .' '. ~
'.': ~ . ,.' :. .:... .", . , ...
~
......
"
,.
~. ' ...
" .
"
.
.... . '-..;...
.',
.... . '., ~.
. .
• 'J
'( .. "
292
.,
293
" ." ", . ~ ~... I' • ' .. ". .. .."
'.
...,,",'
. ..... .' .
294
':' <;,•••••. ..... ,...... '\ ,".
..... ,'" : . "
'. ~:"'.
.
.'. ....' .,: " ,'. 'V
.... -:
" '
. .'',', ; .' - .. '. .. ' . ~
~.,.~ ; '
"',: . . . eo'.: . .';
. -. ','
" ... ' ,
i(fs~::tl.lIit'e~pofuj~ ·rooin ~nlav~ ~~OCes.·SOT ,Is .the· S!J~.~~ .vet:s~on. revi~iori; ..ana·:' .: ~::.: :..: :
".: ,::.~ ..'. ~~;.:: ;':: .:.~,;~~'~'Jio.~g~
l .;i "':"::' .. !;;expei;~'s.erial'itUmijer"E!s;describ,t!d~ro~.:·
.... ::',' ';';,:'; :.:'" '.. '..' '/ ... ...:,:,' :. " :', ';: ~'."'. ~ ".'::~ :.~" '~.,:>,:
~. /.;>'::~: ":~:-' :;(~:jJ.£1~~::;;;:/in~,~ ~.:. ~~;::: :' .:.:, :.';,'.;' :~~ ~,) ".: ,'. :,> ~~;; :..,:.~; .<.:~:. ~:. ~ . ~; .\:.,':;:. '.:.< :;,'~ ..,'~.~":". :'." :r. ;" : ;"::". ,
l '.:::: ;~~" :\ .:~:~t-b~,;\~~i!i~~ '~,~~i i~'e.:slav:~':~rQ~~'O(; .. Th~..sj'a~~. :pr~~'oi :'iii :~~pn~~~l~' f~r .~. ~. ::,:~'" ~: i'.. '• •
.:..... ::.~ ,/0 :~ .. '.: itI0J~~}'O~lll; '~h~ I?t~~lU~X. }l.i\q:~a~gt. O.r..~e- ~lgri~I;' ~it~ ..ohol?P'er- .~~h~!,l.:;~Pt~~, :th~, auto: '.:.:. '; .. :: '.' :'.
"f:'~~ :~~.!t~, '. ~ . :.: ~~~lt15f~~~~}~~~:~~e:.~~ n~~;'~~~~~;'~~ ~~~~~.~~~~I:~~'.tt}e-~18r~.~~1:r·.:· ::.:. :':. :.r
f r'...:.:. ;':.: :~. :.:~.&' ~~l ~~"~itlt'~~~cri&~;ih~':~ :~~ filter ~~~·f". ~~~~~l\~l~i~i~ .~~~i;~:,th~l:::~:. ~ ", :::': .. :
;.i:":~
~.
'.::' :. ~:.:"~;; . ;l(iC9~o!:~lii1nh~l:~~:~~ :~tcrl:et~~(6~~e~: ,'~e' ~eitt ~~!,ciigif,$. repr~Cl\t th~. r~'.(isi~n :;..'. ::;" }. ,; ~";'" ..
", '.' : .... : :';I\tritber offhc·slave,·softwarc.· The la:st ~u~ ot'clJgits.is the- tr.alJing mirhbGt' of.lnc·setial' .. ;,.' ,': ..•....: ..
:f:>:' ::?::~t·~~.~fl~,,::H'\ :.:~~: ~;t:::j:':} :):;;~ \"\::, :::.<>j~: .1.:.;,;:;:.:,; '/,:;:\?:: .: : ':r.~:
. " , \ ;.\PRINT.'Ett'CllltCJ<· "
~:.f· ..:'. '.
'.' .'. ._' .. \', .' ," '" '...... '. ." .... ;, \ " ..
;:'/ ~ .
/i::.i··::·,;t:·:/)t~r;:~.~(~8t·r.~~et~·Pt~: ~~ei!~{'~Cji9~,~~'1~~~~'~~::rt,,'~~ ~:\i~~ 'ili~~~~~':pfi~~e~:~4 i~·:..::: :,::~.~~; )':. .,;'.
Jl' :.~::~. :. :~:'~: ft~~~:r~~~:!1~~~~~~·~:~~"s~~.~.~~ ~~~~~~.~~, ~f f.~~~~:1~~::.:~: "~;': . . .:.~ ,: ,.:. ,.;'. . . :/:,.. :~.:.;. ,::,:': ~": ....
;: ':'~'.:' 'f:.. \'j :~,·/.r¥~.~~~~~~rp#~ter.io~~~~i(~~i~ilfh~·.Ceh~irlo;.f~~;.r~!jeiB·.k~~~'.~j~r~iril'ai(on: .':" '. ,'i. ::.. ,.., ..: .
.t·.. . :: . . :./:.~:.: )1:l:~tr.~~s~~~~· Q~~tN:~~~ 9t "~,u:ri q~. .,P~'~~~~,~s: 'al~?' c';.tJ~.~~.~~· d~pl~yt;~:at" . : ... 'i:.;·: .. .
.: \ ..'.:;:;\.(~. ::::·i?··~:r~;)~::;~·.~··L~:·<:' ::~~~:'~:~~/:.::"~::?:~' :J'.<~'.~'.>.,:~':;:: ;\:·/·:.Jt '/.:' :~.: ': :~ .~:. ::::~\<. \~,::.~: \~I:. /.;:'~ ,.. '.: "'. ;.'
I, NoTa ClIECI<; '.
.,.... '. -, ':1 . ~ ':', " , : \., ~ '.' .... .: '...... ; . : '.' : . -.. .' ., ."
; ':.;".", ," r ; ,:.mte'~C·.(R~ i:iffic··6';'~k).di~'ujl 1'8 Fobpori;ible for nt~lntaiqln8: t'l1~ p:roper lJn\t= ~d 414t6 '..:;. .I','. • '.
,:( ~;:::·t~:· /:.:

. .: ;.:.~
"m ~ i~~~cnf ..~~ .1*'pU)~ \S 'p~~~~ 'bY; ~.q(l,~eri'~heIi' thc'P~~~k'·sv'i~~.tQ: ~~'unlfJf '..:::.' : :'.:"
: ',' ~hO~ engaged;: rf, an·ltn'alld. titn~ ot Ql\te is detected a ('CLOCK: rm:;a.oItl' Will'be.i'ndicated .:. I " •
.:'.:':'..:::'. ': . . ~..:-,t1y 'th~ ,~iSpiaf.)~o:cOJTe~i·ibe tin=1c-ana 'clat~.ii~c·th~ ~~y\;l6~/.i·· :'" ',.:,' ~'; ' ..<..:::;'... ~. :' ..... , ..
.l~/:;·:~·::~··: ..'>::·:-:::~~:····':::':~·:::":·:'~::··:·~/,,·\.:.;>:,:···:··:·.·\:/3~ . .',;. :....."..~; -:':;... :'; . ::,}...:.. ,. ...:..::.-:-::~:;/ ::.:.; .. '
", \.~'" '"1';':1T:E:RN~Il'" .i... .'. I ...
"".. ...:. -. • •••• '0' .~'~ • ." • •• ;1'.' " ,..,'. : ' , . , ' . ~i. . . . . , . . . . . .'
.' .; "",
• • . • . •. "
I • •: .<'. • • • .". .' eo·· • :',',. : .. ." ••• 0 • :. ,. , :
,.' ,' ...",
'~. • •
'.'
. ,:,,: .: .;. "..,': ·.1'~e ~nt~~~. st~CUFrO$ oft.h'~ j~t~~n.t·~ peing)~tc:d; ..INernaJ 'H 2 .~~ 3: CO~PP!1~' !o:: .; -." ..' .
, : , ..··::..tlie valiies.·Q.fO..l,OOs Q.2E)O,'and"O.3!lQ.:respectivery,.:. ';'.:. "'.'1"'. !; '.' ,~ ' .:.:; : .•.. ;
::'·i:~:.::/~. ' ··":\~::·~~~~~~~I~;~·~~:~:. :.':C~··.~~ .J'~:.:-:.{~::. :::L:: : . ";~.: .':' .<...\<)-:,.. .;:.:'/':~:':' ',:,: ,: >.;~~:. :~.'.':.: .;' ;.:"~ "~'.". :,;
.• : ': :-. ·"The tnt"em'nhliagnos:tiQ teStin,g oftlle.·instr\UI)ent Is comiMte': ~1I fQncti'ons.hav-e passed me;:~ : '. .','
,. "
. .'
~ . .' :.
"
.
0 •••_
,. • , .....: ••• • 1., .~• •

". '!,'.
. ~'.: ". .'-
"
"
-..
.,,: "
. ..... ' ~ . ~
I.
.,
'.
':
:;
'.'
.. :. ".: . ~> "'. ... ;:'. ,,' ,'" "
~ '/-:~,~' ":'~"
.
••• J •••• "
1.... .' '.' •
,
> • • .. '~
,',
. ' • " .
~ ., • ' .• ; . ,~ t
" . ~ , • : •• : " ". •..." 7 .'.
I>
.:' '. .
.' '" '....
.. .. - . ..............
' ......
'
, '.
..... .... :..:: -'., :., :.:.';' :\".: ".
" ',.
.. .. ...• ~ .:. :~ . ..
. ...
" ' , ' ,",
" • t ...
\'.
.:. ... (. ) ~.
, '
.','.
'.' ~.
.' . .'
. ~.
.. I'~
','
,;.
. • '. :. . ~ ,\
.. ':
. ..
" '.
"
:", " . . ' .

".>. • ..
,
. ,
.... :.
..... .'
:~: :'. :.:~.~:) :': ',.,
'.,
\ : . .
.' : ...... ..
'
.;
,~
.
.. ,...\ ...
',:
.:",
.. ; . .'
.., .....
'. '
,. ; .
.... '. •: • "6
.:: ..... :. ~ ':- ':. , .. ' ." . ...
295
.~. r ....
. ".\
. ..
.(
"
,,' I;; . • •_ .......,

'. '
..... '.
....
"
.
.'
\ .
..
'.\'
"
296
.:; • 4. ;: ',~. , ~~ : • •' ' . . : : ' . ' ,.: ...: • ; ',:; , : .: " " :_ : . ; . : :. 1, 4 ~ ,:.
..-.:... ~"".:.:.:.:" ",'::.;':.:'.:' :.:./ :

f
:".: .'.:-" ..:::; .. .' '" :: '. ',. . ....." ';'" >':.::" .'.
;:1· ". . '. ~. .' .•. , .' '".. ; :. ... ; . , ;'" .:' ~
. ','
.'
. 0'":
.
..
.. ..
~ '
'
.' .
~l; :.~ . ~<~~:.:.:;.~:.> :;.:~·L··:::~.~~:r~~~~f.~~,~;:~~~~",~~~,:~:,: ~~.;:' -:';:>' :.:/~:{ :::'. ~/ ....:~ ':;:'. :::.':..".: . . )'~.>'~:~:. L-::.:·. ': :" .:.
~ .:::'., ': ',:', :::"DiagnbSti~· and sCi uP 't\tnOtiOnS-Oan:bc ~'Cc'Ompllsh~·thro~gh ih-e: Key~~d'Qptio~ Me~u; :: ":/\.: :: .
I
. . . :: ::\:" ';') ~OP.impi\i~ ~O~.as:~ J.S~h<i'B~~pe s~u(,4ce. ",: ;.,:.::::', ."':'.....~. :'.,:' :? ,:,"-;""':'.: ;".: .~ '.: .. ' ..:.:.': .: .
: t.. ·.:·· .:......:::.:~,::.\:. :·,.;-·"~:;~ ..;":t~ .."; .:>.:...... ::"';..::.::.~ .::'' ::':::.:': '.~., :.~' ..."'-: "; :.:(:~<':.'~:' .::;":': .:": :',.:;';':". " :. '::'"
:I"~':::~:>" .·...
::;to:~~rih~.~e'y~r!t:ij:QP;ti()n$ Me~,.p'r~s.t~~ ~S~'ke~t~c'e lrl'rap,d ~l1OQ~it;irnV~i.le~~.:,·.·, .i .~:'. . : ' , '
. :,,'::-'. '.:" .:~ ::1~~e~~ ~-:tp~'b.~ ·lD~6. ~ODp .It ~~y, ~~ ~. f~W ~~f!,mpU:~:.g~ ~~ t'n~~ert.t t~>: '"," " .,", .. .'.
.' ... .. '~:." .. ~;,:·t~z~ the:B$G Esc ~and: Tho t':J1ltng .1s at"ltlea! for ¢~ 1tey'~Ke. This WIllS d~·. :, .'. . " '.' .
:I~ .,) : : ,:. : ;" .·:~,~l~~rt~lr~9~?!p,~~~~~.~~~~~F'<?~~~r-~o~;.~~~~t}~.~o!fj~~,~.~~:'
·l~:····':·:"'f··:t.,· .. .. .... :~ ~.::~ ~.: :;::.~",l." I;.:"~~, .....
):":..'~'" :....
:. ~ ... ~.' ...:.....~:.• ~( : 0",' :'~; :,;," -'":'.'~.:,.':''' ',: .:t ...:." .'J'~'" ".
~'" :,.'.... ',' ::.: :<; ~,~ep·th~JrtStruiUenbIebbt.n1~.the:~SC:·ES~" ~.o.1l1~d; it.inaY ,r:esPt?~~·.b:y. a$kin~ f<?r ~":' ':.';.; , :: ~.,~. ":", .
.1"'; ,;:'.' ,.:.. . :'.;~. ~as~v.!Ql:~:.::nu:$i~·an·ad~e51·tn~Wf~t.e-o.f:~!~itY'req~t~d·:9Y. sorj-u~.c~~tP~.,:~e:~~ '::,.::>.;' :'.'-:., :. ':'
.: .:~~...:;:\ ~,:V.::·sho~ld..#$p.lay·,~'P~WOF:P-'·;· ~yp'~~li.ql.1e p~~~, :giVeJ;l' by. tlie ,lu,1P'~r;i,is9;-ofJ~~ :.: , ': ' . ": , .....
~ ~.:. '.~: ':pro~mtn ,and jrte~ ~ .E~t1i le~er ~fth~ p'~.s"1lr~ \~.nhl1ow '~l? pn th~ d~plaX.~~..'.;'.:,...:..... ..
>,.... . ','
:: • : .. '" • •• I
:l:.:.. . . · . . .
,~:~( ~.; /XiA:~r';f!dd·c~h~~~tY':·\:Th~:~s~et:t ?A11.~ t~·th.e.xpL~.Mp'PJ~-dfan'.~pto~~
~:, .:",-:" '.> : ; " ' : : :"p'~,¥<!¢.is' ~t~~:~fil 'the: Sr.~:r~ -roS1~ J?utt911 i~ '~~.;q.-: 'It". tqc' pro:p~t ·passwo!d. k:,." ".:. ::".
( .,'~ ~ .,.'.'..: ;::~~~Ie;d:,~e,!~~.y~~~l~~:Oi~l~t~~l~~:,?f~~~li.::n:.e~~~tt.~~~~O~4..~~~~~.~ ~~u. ~~~ ~:~.~'~" ....
,!,,: _. .....W1jr~.by.~~~e~~~,.h~...yar60p~O~.: ......:'. '. : .......': ..... : "..' ....:..... ~: "'. ,J.'
:.:. 7::, ~ .;:', ::--: .:.? :~~.:;« ".:~)' ::'?'.~<. \', :,:/i..:':v ~.'~'; », ';::~.~;..:.'::,<'j," :: <~ •• ":;. ::.:. " :~. ;~~:':'.:::::>.:..<.(.::::'. '.: ~.' j. /~:
': :.' •• :':.:
..t,... .: . ~:.~: ::::.. '::.. . '~he:~!i~tQ~ed)K~Ib,o~y:'~ Ql?tlOIi(Meuu .::. ',' ::','" ,".'".-: ~. .,::'::' . ~ ..:, ' ..... :
".:' :.. .:>
>:":; : :''':'~':;~. '; /:; »~, '~;:'",:;;': ,;.\::~I'. :.:.: '.:,::~. <:. ;.. .:;'.:':':;:- .'..:',. :'..;., . . ,:" ::'"'~ :.... "':.\ .'..:.;/::\ ~;' ".:, :.,\:: ',. ::...
.'
l':;:t r~' ':~ ': "t):p~t"'i6r:'S4~~its~~ 'a~a:Xe~ll~ici'a~ Lev~(~eYb~a:rd fJnctiob/(····.:: :.' .<" :.:"" .;.-:. " '.,
./:..>.: . (.:.:..
~","::' ~:~':' :~,>:::' .' :'. '>:.,: :;:" :;.::',,;' >:. : ;:; '" . .:,:,.' ','.:.:. .( . . /' ';":
:::'".<;,~. :-,;;:<~.:.: ... ':,., :::'~.' ... ::. :.: .=-:' .
,;1 ':, ~. ::.:<;, '\::". ae~~tt?e, ~Iitt~\~6~~ ~f.<?p~i~ .b~in~ ~one ,~~.bu~~ ,~~e ~~~b'Ojlf?,:it, ~s ~c'c~s~~ tQ :...:..... :'::.. : .:' ~ .
"..,>. ":' ';: :: ,:~"v.c multlj>l.e~~n~ to alsp,lay thC C~OlC~S' •• ThiS rntDxtlfz<:r.50(lO~.lutiH}~'f:e~.ICly.~1~ ai···. .:: ..'( . .;
;i:·..: ·:·::~::·;:·~.::'::.''';f~,~~·~¥.~·::·:.:;. ~:;. ;:;~, :<:/::'. : " :'. ':,: ; :::':'. :.:.,:'.>.. ;:':'.~ :-", :'~:: ,:.. . . '.;'::.:, :' :.:
~ ~'.:'~ f; "..:' :. ~":':':- ;'..~ '.. I. ' / . :.:., ....:; •.': '.
: :; ,... '.::' :·. :>.)bSi~t~t~~~lt;bas,.a:~t.rrijted·~?);~i.oJ9Eli~:nS::4i~\~re~~~ qnt.X ~~~,me~~::'~ qee..r;::.·:!·" ,,': .

:.,...: _~. "':~, ::_ ~~~C1t·r;~el~.,ha;st~·~·~:era~;~~ ~~~s~~p.~;Q:n.e.~e~.j~n~~:~<)~.)be: sUp'~~s9rl~;use~.::.: ..:... ~\; ;
~ >:- ~".. ;:" ;'.:' ·~Jl6Gbn\~NfLevel~ ..ba,~ P?!~fthe; op<;~a~Q:~d sup'~y!-sot !O~uS' ~!i, ~:e;xtril .fl,lenu ~th:. \:: '.~,:" . .,
.,' :t~....~. :.:.~.:' . ,I.: .~:..:....:•.~ ..>:: ; .~:- ··:~~~t~~.?P~~~ 'foqettipg ~p:Qf.th.e;!~.~I#~··'" -:',...~.:; "}".:~':'f, ::':;:. /,',1: -:'. -:, ~ .
,Ii,~:~.'{}:~:f!;:~t~,;{MK:\·~Ai{·:<~~::.;;~;i~t'!r':~~"Fo:.·"!·.r(,·.':'f~?~';i\:i~,,~!J;'e'l·::\ •.:·'.' '"

J.}.',/..:., ::. : : ,' ::\~~:~~~;~ tli~ keyb~~d:#qti~~i ~~si.~;B.s.~·t, r.~~9:·~;.q'~G~~< :~t~i~i~y"~~.E~r{ :'. ::.~:;.:).,~ '; ~
.", ",:: >.: '.,', :.. :,'PASSWQRD'!;WiJl.8ppear; .En'(~nhe password glvenJor y,oUr fippU~atiQn tQ di~pla~::' :.. ' :":' ',. ',: .'.. "
.. , .
... '
.: ' .
-' ' " 0,_
...... I"
-,• :. . . ,
. :: .
. , ....
" .~ ';, • <;"', .
I'~, . ", '.
.' .' ..'.
<. '
~ ..... ' , • •
. l
' .
297
..... I
: ..""" :
• '.
.' .....
,': .'. 1': ;', , ....
,',
,',
"
..
~"~ :
."
, "
"
..'
'"
, :
. ,-;..
" .
... • . '
, ,
t
,',
. ". " .:: :t· : ,
' .
" .. ...
~
.
'"
"
..... "
(
,
,
"
.'
"
"
....
'.' "
"
I
"
"
..
" . . .. .~
".
'.
298
.'.:" "'.,
"~
" .. ,.
,.~ .< '. t';.!' .:: .
"
,." .•*
"
299
•••••• ·~· ....t."..· ~:':',:', ';.... ..,,' .,... ~ i' ..... ~ ". "~". t ',' ,'. ", .. ~: :~
•• J:":' .... \ i.
.,. • •' \ "Ow", '. i.···I.:·~·.t· .. '.', ".:', r·.· .:. . '.t •• ·:"'~.. ••..•. :. . . . . .
: ~': : ! '. .' ~ '... :.' '::' '. • '.~' . ' : • . ' '. ~. '.. ". • ..... '. .... '" : ", : . • • ~ .~ /;:.' • \
~. :"'1' :: .-.
".'.:
~ ;,.
0' '.-
• • ..' • ::
• }., • • • • : .
,: .., •••
J'
~.,'~' I
•
•
•
•
'.'
:' 0;",
'w
..
• ';'..
~'.
' : ....
.', ..... .<:...... : '.
.: :', ....ft· ; •.• ~.:••,' : ~..... :.,tW.""'~ . . Wet·Bath··:·..···:· :',,'...., ~.;. :'. ~ .... "' ..i ',::••: ... ' . 0"" : '. -.: .:.: •• " t:., .: :', . '
,~);: i:!: ::#t>.;:_.?:;:~ ~~.;~#~;;~::;:~:): ;;~.'::: l,.i;.:;{;':':: '?~;:;,::: ;():::::::'(.:,:::.:': .? :::~;::':: ',.
'.:. :::: ~. : :.. :.:..:.TIie.l~~~t.~l~.p~Q~p.t.~I~l\CAJ;.,;P.~·~,CtP) .:. -< . ,':' '.':, :. : .'. ~..>:..' '
:::' ',' : ' . '.: ;...... ~:. •. ;.• , C.lD~:•. ·..;:DJ~Jiy1hl:·cun'e.nt'barometriC:pl'essUi'e '.:~' .': :." ..:. ". '. ~.:.. ! :,... .
~. 1* ~
..' : . , ; . . "'.:. ',' ~. .. ... ; • ~
. . ,' .... :'.," ..... C"'r··.:~'.:;" .. ojo~5P~': .. -Print·Uie OUfl'ent barotnetri·c.cllhbrEJhon ", '. '.. : ',', !:. :. :,' .... ..4', .
• .." .. .. ". ' . • •• "' • •' # a • •: .. o. ;. ., . . . . .;. ." ".... • ." .'
..;>.:.' ..;: <..:;. /... '. .'':-;'' ,::; ..'.

H. " •
.!'. I:' -:"c'):-' -lia'sthUnCJi\,ptOi%ipts 't()~ "BNiER· BAROME.TRlC". t~ ~etr~rm.··..

. :: . ::.::. " • . • :'!;,.,~ : ;,' :::".: \·:··'fpd'Jnf·e.8iiiiraUon·im t.he'1;lar6metnt: soasor :=.: : ~H':' ",':'.
J;:'.;\V;:./::::·\~~::,::~!\): F<. '?f;:\:<:·:·: :.;,.:,' :';).'/.;: .; :,:;;;':~:.:':;:.:'.::. >..;:. .

' • . ' -:.' ....... ,.... " ~l~t.l. :-QUlt ....• ' '. : ", ~ .. , '. " .. ' . ,. ..' . "'. '.: . '.' ... , ."' .'
.....
*,:\ '.>;:~:; ~.~r~lt\,~¢J~~i·~:::.?~ :.~~~.>? ·,:/;,:~j:·::;t.!~:~·:/?:j: 'y .:.,~: . . :.~<~~> ~': ~ :', ~·~·~·:·r.:~:' ': :~ .'/.',.':. :"~:"': .
;'/ ~I'::': ··t:....·:·.:· ~:'~.#.~qt~r :~~c'~I.dia.~~~i? t9()~ t~ Q~lJl ~fr~jii~ ~~l~{~:f1i~*':iji·eJ~eP;t· t?t.' C;.. '.:'" ;'.' .... '.
_.: '.',.,.(:... ';";,:ad~htid ~l>~; :l!!.'~~'·l!'9d~, .the:prpGOSS~r ouwut·~, e~c~:.of th~ ~y~: ftlt~ aJWC~s::· ::; ', .. '.
. .::: .. '.: .: :. :',," Qn~'it'4~tip1e'o~'Jhc:~ilSPhty~ TfOhe.~r ~o~~·<if~¢ fi~.:fi1t~r~itioiut.~·ltqt;used;a·zero, or~: .;. ;.: .
':. :..:'" :. >:7 :i,.·:·i~ S~neg~tiyen~~e'f·~illd·PPP~<lJl·.thi·dill~l~Y::-fot .~t ¢'h.~~f~.1'h~s.is ~epaUsl?:~~d' .
. ~< ~-:.' "
.,..... :~" . ;'., ~.::··.:,~i~~. P?Sitj~~.~ !J!!~d.~~.~<>.I~~.plitgs~h~~~· iIl~qY-' ~O· J~~~t ,to ~~. ~e~.e~tOl'.;~!!:~~DC~·.n~.> :.... :'.::: : '.
....:.::..:. :' -1: ::.. ",:, : ::.: ..:: :. : :. ',; :..:: : .'. '\";" ,":" '.: :.:
.:'~:., :.:vaJid·c~~~.rl?adinglt· ,.:. ~
'" :.,.~:.;.:. ~".;:: :',:" :1/ ~ ~:>: '::;;,:',:.; '.~'.:,' ::<: ~·~.:i :"':..;~ .'::/.~:: . :.:' ::<.. :~ ,'.: :..: :/. ..~.:: ;,.;: '.'-:. .:', ) .:'.. '.<::: .:.::' .
1- '.> ;·'t-/ie.olspia)'.WilhRoyt.tftc oUtput:.· :. ::' ",'::"
J :., • • I : '. '.' . ~":" '. :.' \ ..
'_'": ."'.. :::. {-"\' . ;~::' .': <:~~~~i~~J~;~·.~·~~~ :··}::": :~. :<: :.:.~";. ':"': :.:.~.:., .:
,".:::,.: .:' . ':,' ......J.':. :;YY ...... ~friQi'ciat~ th~ j{i'~tri:Urienfis'il'1 c;" ·... whidimodi: ::. .. >;..~ . ,. ,.. :.....:: :. ':" ,.
~ ~ :> ::":.,~:' '.
.'
':'.: :. :..':.:.: ::'":':''' .:.:: ...• '.; :.: .: :~;.. ,.~ .. ICH,i'n:diqi\tQsD"Mmod~" .... ,-<.,'.: '-. ,:'. ,: " " ". ..,
d ~::' ;';'_":.' . ". " >;'.' .::.,..:'..:::. " .:'.: ; ··iN·ihdi'ta.tes.ii1te~irs~&ids.:"· ;.: :' ::>. ' : . '.
•" :.> .~... . . ~.' .:":. ': '''',
.. · . 1 ; "·",. ; . "
, •••• "
" .. ..,": ., .. ',.-, .' "~. . ' ." '
'.. : ".:....'I.:.
. . .;' .' '." ~ .' ." X· ' .... '. '../:~.,.. ..Is ~'t..
\0." t
thc·thannc:l
: _•.,
n~ber
,.~: .:
'... "'. ~. . "'~ .
··.·t;: :'::." ." .. ',',,: '
.. ,• • • • : ;.. ; , -: :.....
,.: "lo
,I •• ' , '•.• , . , . ."
. -. t
,
.
. ,". . '., '., ., .,' '. WVV. ., ·is U,IC v~uo of the .cha,onot H' ..: .", ...., '," '.' . . ". '.
•, ; ' •••-: • . , '
• • • . • • • • • • • . • • : • . ", 't·
.'. : :., .... I
, ..
'.. ""-_n... . . . . ·.'t.·-'th··
J,'t{'u"u'I.·: lol
. ' A'· ":":".1.. ' L ' I'
~nolllCnBu1'e'./.or·'Hc.cUNUIC.
. "r'-' •••••• ' • •' ... - ' . ..
\"~."", .', .... .:.
". .:'
"
: -.:.. :;.'~.':.$~':: :;; ~ i': ~~.;,:..:.~~./:~,,"! .::... ~~.~. .:.: ..::/.:.~ .' '. :~: ... ~:~ ~.: ...~.;~ .~:. ::.''' '... : .. ;'--'.' <' -,.; • '~'., ~•• ':: •• ~.:' " ••••:':.' .:,~~.~ ••~-:: -, ~.
: .~... :.' .~~., ,,~,:: .:: n\e vahitt'd~'sp'i'ar6d is: tW;· y8.J)i~,te~ii from' the iUittlog to cli~i~ ·c9~ycrier. 'fh~"n6i~e:~g~:..'
t: . J.. :'.: :~ .\~lve~tt:Cprbse~ta~i9n:p(p~~ohce of~e·~li~r<r ... n? 'noiSe '~'gur(rs ~~ dfrt~~nCe .' ': . :,'
... >. ;'.: ./. \';.: :~~~.tb~:~i¢~um~atJ.d;mj¥pmui~i'Of,3~·~cU~ia~~I'.sainP.[~.: 1'{Qi$.e~gWe!l,a.:b9vo 6.0:wilf '. .'~: . .'. '.
I :':,'" .'
I'" .':~ .~. :,,::~: :, :,: f~W. ttte'p..t~})I1~tY:testS.h .~~:Xjo~s~:~~re..l~:irr~t~v~tfor. the.. iQ~epl~~..ai)Q.·f;heJMo~iip~~.'· :~,:' :
:.~. ~.; ~ . ':;:<:'<:~.~:~~i~~s:·:.:.}.~~;:\;~::. <r~. ~~;.~/:.~~: ~:.<~\~.\: :~: ' ~:.':j:'.;~:"

~I' . :::: . ':,,'~..'';::~~n$~~ p'~.~e.~~ does.~hspl~'y.d~t~(:~t:~t~P:s ~.ug~:c~cn ~annera:nd·Flsp~.a!~ the da~~ ':'~'.~ .~.
,: ;: ".1. :?" ":;::: :-~t: :~;·:. . :~:(.}.< <:-~~~'~.~ .\':'~:~~:'. . ;. :"::~. >.. :",
: ", ':....
'. :; ~ :;.. ~.~...\.:!:rfQf al.'pr?~1~~.~~~¥ ~~:·~~9;!nd~~.~s·:e?l1ti~~es: untll.~~ ~f'tR;~T.Es:r.~~tton ~~ pte~~eq ~r: . .'.:. ..... ' ...
:c" .' " .' .~, \ ..... the !te.y'bo.ard1S used !Q·sefectanodler:<lispfay .fOt:m~L Th;e.-selechon.of.the dt~p'lay . .forme:t1s·' ('.' . '. :
;.,._'.:. ;':" ::.":.:.' .:'.: :~~Q~pti5hed br. :p,,~~i;i tb~.ES"C:k~j{ twice mC?~. :A:i~jn~'beoous~'tigiing"al'!"$i ~ec!1titi iU-~ \. ". ":? :.' :. ':
...:;.. ,.:. ;.~. ', :' l:\f.:~"c~nc~m; 'jt'roay;~~~'~ .f~~~etript3:foi
~A 1.,."'.~
.th~ .ip.~tlRlme.n! t~ re!?9gr.t~~·~he ·c<?min.8:0~'"
..". "··'"1" .. ' ·~th "~f J'.' ~ .......... •
·~ro.x:n
-.t.·.,·
..:'. :...'::: .': : '.
. ::.; :.' ". :.;:..:~~ ;I?Y¥ wode;ano.. ::.<
# ••• ,011' •
~~ m~~:w·~ .. ?P~l<!~,\iti .. ,appc;ar;..: :: :"::·:·:·:·':'.~.:·l .~:

•• A
: ;:':': : :' " ,.':.' ',' •
.', ,'.
~ ,., ;'. .... ..' .
:.
' ...'
, -',
.
• -. ": • t':•• ;.
. .
• ••-,:. ' •• :.' .. ' '.
.......
," ~.: ;. ,"'
,":':', ; ...... ,.
~ .. ' :.: :,' '.'.
300 . ".
'" • ~j, ... " "
•• "" <',
. '.,' . .' ,. .
•",. '. .'.o"
.' ,
. ,,' .
". ~ " ::.,'

.. : :-:"
.. . ..
'"'"
-.; "
.. ':.,'.....; . ., ....
'
,'.
". :",.' • ".'. > .: :.,~.' '\ '
.• '1 .. : .r:~.'-"1 _ ' . . '

301
.. :". ,.: "'::" \. "." .. . '. ~
•••• J
'. '. .."

'. " '..
\'
..
" .; . .': \ " .... :-,
~
.... ,.
",:' .• '. I ••: ' :
.;'.~
,.
" .
'.
••..·r
. "
:-\' .,: ~.":. ":'.. :.' .Wh~'diis·*pti6il.iS·iiot'aativetN>1·th~ insti:urireq(wttl stiltreb6id.th6 ieshecoipS as befo~ ...,: .:.. :.. .;.
'1:.: .'" ~.' ~::'i.:~::)j.~iiW:r.;'·~tt~:th~ i~~~t l~,~~~ :f)f.~~.~~'ble..~~.q~.:~t),~ii~: ~~~~,n: ~~ d~t~.t7·~e.:oi~~t.:.·; ':."" .,:'..
I '.
..::r >.' ::,.:,:. ·,·:-~t<;l~Q-~7·FQ~~f~t~~~ne~'Sl~~~:.:AP.?we~}'1f:>~tQ:~l}":~~tip'nl.fr..?,1:l.d~
I • t .. *1" paol.<-aa,e.from CML .' ;.. ,.. ." ,.
• ~ .... e'o~lea~ons II .,: ....... ;.~. . . ;'.,~.
..no~~1(~.~¢.::~: :~ .....:
.' • ...... .\ '.. • • ~ .. ""
~J:'~~ '.:;~::.:;:.;·~:/~',:~~··?~.~~~:·~:C··: : . :.~':." : ~ ': }: ~~.:: ~:';:?':.' .::r~\:. ~.':,~"~.j<'~:::>:: \,~~.~\«!(.:.~.~::> :"/:':~'.>; .~;~'.:::>~.A;. ~'\~~(.: :::.; :.';
"
.'
"1' : ....:?: ::. K.: ·\.Jh~~.~~e.ep~.ra.~~~·Rt1.~T~~'ing ".' '.::.. :.... ..,'.....:':'. 1\' .:', •• 1..:; ' . : " " ' : ": ~ ;.t.·· ~:' ,:: .
: ~..~.::.',' :.:. "::ibis IteJi·i'btinis:up;~~b.rbeh\l- Wll.ich,~ttQy.,s tlle 'QpeT~t6('to fti,imitor vot.uPi~·'and· fl.o~··'.: ':'.,'" .;. .,
'.... :.....:... ,'.' ·!··;.'meas~iement (p.re~;ffie'StARr:'1EStbutt6·n·a~ any t1meio·rctili'ti~tCttbe'lbLEMQ'bS).·~ :' .~. '. ~: '.
:'.:,'.::: Z'\:.': ';"{::', : . :.~·.:1;~~::·::::
. . . ". . .
,::j.; "::'. '?; \;i'::~: i.::·:·;-:·~ :::". =,-:"\..:;:. ':,',. . . l~'.::;: '';
, fLO'\i\t..· . ·,F,C,P1S,Q .
': ...:', ':J.:~~~')~:'.: '~:"::;:.::
1 : ••••
;:.', .:.,~.
I ',.- •••• ' ,. ••••• . ••• '• • • '
' ..
~···:;:·:··,::·,·.:".··,t:.;~ ~':.:<. :.. ~ "':":"'."~':: . . :::..::t::·· :~··!:·.::r:~:·.;·,; . . :· . . :::·'·:;;:..· ':~:::'~t.:. ~.:::.':<: .. ~'.:: ..::-':':' '; . :.:.:':':
:f'~.. .,.,;.,,:' ,"; ."', :. "F'! .. :. :f.19'Y(.:mbpit~':".~
.: ..:: '.' :... ":'..:: . -.:','. ,\.: .
~':'
:.... :Y.YY:'f:·· '. ·zz.zz· ',.: '.;..." ',". ','. . :;.'.::. ':".'
".,'.::. '..the NJ). rcadinjt'-iom the,floy! senso£·. ' . . '..:". : . ".
~ ~. ~: '~w :~:::
~.o t.· .. '0 '" i :'. ~ 1. .. '. '\\.. ...~ :0. " . . -. I' .'1: 0': ... :. ~ .:J " .. ;~ .
'.. •• ::
':1;' '. ,'.: ,:~,:~,,,;>: : :.:'. ';, :; ,,,:::, :~....:;.

,' '.,' .. ; ,: ·'·~/
,:. ',' .';'
'1;;;;:::·tOa '.1f,; ?'r.'·~:Jtl~~'o/~~~o~.;: .. :.', "::": '!

\'it:",':'voumc\'n.ltel's··.··:·•. · .;;
>;
:. "','.. ,
.:.
'.:y:'-:"~:~;~ .::.:.,:':':.:..:.:.:.:.::
.I.
;'
t
••
.' .. .'
::.,': "..; ; ;-., ",:, :(Ii rii:i.iliiii~fib\iiW\:lst:b·~·~tt~~·q.'l)~ffi~~ the yol~e'&~gihs:!\$m,ng) >';' :"~'.:::'~: :-:':.. ,:., .
':'-:". :'::L;":"'~. :'. ~:::,.:~' . '::'.~:'';:~,: i ( .. <~~:., ':~';:~::'::"'<'.";.:'::: ..'... ::': :':".: :'.':.~: ,~. ':.::'.' :'::.;' . . : , ;. " :;~\'.;: ~;" .'
. I, !.
~..
. ' .\
.:.~.~:."
~,' .
t
J," . ~,·ltCh' ' .. C:' 11'b.i.:1ibxt'· '.
..... ~.::. ~~ • • : • .:'. ' . " •• ~ 0 .... ~ "'O:.·;:.... " ,
l '·0; •• "
.•••••'.' ,. i, .....
.~ ".
..
:to' .'~"..
'.' '.,). '.. • .'.:,,' .....•". .• .. :".' •. ~..' ••• ' .
.' .'... .::'
,'.'••'." '.
:." ':,:. :.; ~:;'~ .:: ;:':" ;Co~~·a.j:l\iItp..\?:~o~b~~tq , . ,: *dJ~~:.~e.l.t1o%~t~.~e' foniY.=:t~ei.ll.s.trU';"·. :".~ :J:.::'
~ " . ,'," •. ' . : :ment'ro,qnrt'Ss:the.START.T:BST- ~, ,:.•. ' ..' . , ..:.<:., .,:' \ ... v ...... •:. . . . ., ':' ',' .(
. <.:?>~.' ',: ~ ·.··:·~~v :>~~~~:' :' ~~'.:'> !':~" ~:~.:;, .~. ~~;<?::
.) ':. ,,:.:0"; •..• ~.,. ' •••~;:' 'f.":tlo· ,.j~.'·:~::.~ :.: :.' '.:"~. 1,",.,:': ::'," : ::~~.:: /~" A·'.::' :A.·.. ~:~t"·.:: .~ .
:\"~" ~ ~.:; ::~::: :~> :~. /. '.:.;. ~: .:': ::': :" :."::.::~ . :: '.:' :.:~. :'.::~. :;:'. _
:J.:'' : . ,,':': .,': :...... ;:~S~q~~ ~ ~ar:ne.tlifOl'\11~tiq~as
'.. "'.:;'.:':. '.:' ,:.':. : }'.:.: .". ';. i
,r.:
'''~
,\,p.Jus.~;, .; .;'.; ' .. .~
'.< . . . :': .• '... ;'•• : ',:: '.: ., ~',
.''.'
'~ ,.".~, ~ .. ~.,.."..J .'tO~OOSE·{B/¢)"
. ' '''~'
:. ':'., .:: : :.'. ' ::,' :. '..... '. ':' ' ' ~".: " .:. .:..
~ :~
.: :. ..' ., '.:' '-. ~:;'~." ..:',' '. etB!" \Bi&ltb' fort (v(;flume is .reset when: a·koy.- i.~:pressed)'.:· .::~.
" ..,; ,. . :-. : ..:;-r:
.. ',' "lo.' : . _ :./ . ' :••
<:\ (':.~ :
::t·.~ ,,~··t.v··." ~.:":"
:: t'.:· ··.uCI;:·.-,..
·.l., ~:': :: ... 0,: •
~ -" . . . .
l('T,.r~tio;...P6rt;.:
'-";'JJ!~. .
'" '0j"t . . .
'.', .'.:~. ". : I, • • • ,"";.' ;.,':, ••• <: .
'.. ~,::':.: •.. f ; \:··.;. .. :i .:>.:..:,,,,:";:.E~~R:~ECO~.S .... l~n~0ft~e.po~l~open·, ~
,:.,'.1 ••::.·.:;·.· •• ': ....
-.:. <" '; .......;. . .,;: ::". ". ::, '·.(press:a·key:to open solenoid and:slart·,tuner)·.· . ". ".
'f::; :.. <.: :,. ::,;~ :':.>,('::".:.'. :I...':.!:~•.•:' :.:.~::.:: ::, ,.,}.:.. .-, '.:'~ ..:.:.. /" >,:.;. . ,''','.. .' :":'. : .
.: ..u: #~, ~ :',1:0 '.. /:' ~~.J::.:.":r~~!US, :\ ...~:.:. ': -ot;... ,".' I,::.: "::., '", . ~.: ...'.:. . ~/•.:.:.. '",.l.; :,' ~ .~-:_ ":; ::"
.r>. ':~\' :;>/.. ~). ::;..~~~~ ~?)n~~.~~~~:~~;.S.?~~:~~~\!?:\~:: .lh.~·:~~~ ~r·~~i:;.:. ;'~' .:'>:..::. .;:.
, 1
.:.::' < ~ :,;.;=:. :;.. :. :.>...

• ••
. : .. ~•.:.:,:,.. ~':Q" ·.:QiJl~andnrtumtci·:aseMenu : ,'. . :'. ", ' . .' .;;: : ".'. .
i;;,;:.::f~-i~;~~;,:;.;~s.t:::)i:}::;;~~(.~?:~:(: :~:S·.L.:';":'·:, : :~:'. ·'r::;; .:::;,::;·:':·::~;::r .'::,;'.".·X'~.i;:.\·:.' i/:~:" . ,.

'I' ~.; ,': \:: .M·..· :CommunJca.f19D seJec'tfolt... I ".;. ,'. ' : . ' ' ' . • • ': .'. '. :... , ' '. • .'. .. • ~ .' .'. :. •••• •
:r :».:': ·::t.~::::: \·.~i\ . :~~::...~:: ';:'.".'" i.:' ::;:;.2:;<:..:·:::·.~}:" .~ ::':'?~ :.:~:::: . . '.;.:~::<~ . .;.:- .':.\ ,:. . :. ;<:/.~ J::~:":".)~~" :.'.'.: ;.' .:. :;.~::.:' .;;.\.. ;,:':.,': :' /,.:. ...
:.'r'.: .. ~ .:.' ;.. ~: ,":I~ to·select.intemaT'triocl.em;' ·.'0!1;to/~C(fct.pByM:RS2J2 cotUie~tiQIi Port:-.: .... :'..' :,:.'. -:- :..A. ;,'.....,',:...: ..' - '.'
... ,
.... "
" .... '''.:<' o l" •. ":'
:""'.,: ":;,'.,
., .....: ""
..
.; .
..;"
..
4·". 0 •~
.'
:... :
. :~:~:~ <~>-> '.
~ ";' •• 'A."
. l . .:
:.... .-
"
,.: ..
.: ' \ , :. ,"':
.
. ~ ... ". ,,' o'.' : ~', . ' ....'.'' ., . .. '
. ~.: , ~ '. .'..... : ~.~~.: ,:' t.,:

'.' . ". :.:' ',' .
.~' .~': .' ~~
.: .' ., . . , ••• ., I :.
" ' .. ~.
;."
.
.....
.'
: .. : .: :. .' ~ .... '. " . , '.
302
:.
• " • ' ". • • • t ' ;": : '. . . , ~ " • ..... • ,
'. '~ .. ' _.0 :.:t. . ':. .: \- ".. :.:. "'.',;.. " ': O. 0"', •••• , .:_ ::. '~.' •••• ": ••: .. ,~.;" ~.""
,"
;; ...
·t....
~
.r· ...·,.t.. :,·.~·
'" -: : • ~....
=.
0"
p',. ,>0 '0':,.>."
,> ~:~nD~
..' •
.. Teilt·t:·
..... • ......
'.~;
.:0 .. ,
. , .:,."; ", ", :. ,':;'.:
• ,. : "': .. ,: ~. •
1." :'\."
..: 1* ", .'. " . , •
.'. :.. . ,.,*"....
:" . ~.' .../...
".' 'l.. ~ •
,'1-:°".
• • • •
.'"
'.. , ,.' ..":''': 1W~..IS.a.roo~e oW!.\pl* diA8fiostJG tcsrfor the prUlter..· "':: . ,. '" :.: .' . :', ' '-:". '. ~ .:': .~ " :"': ..
':~.~,;' ..':-:;'::<, ::':~ '\'. : f· ~~::.~~~f; <:\'~/~;': "~:':~;./':~ ::':,:..: .\. :\::.:~. : '~.: .....::..~ .~;' ,/.,;:' 'i ~ ..': :::. ~"'~:." '(':-. ~r~.'·:·.: ..~::. :. ':'::::' ';:,,::., . ~:;..
;:,~',' ,';';'::'. :,,:{ :.:~J~:J~~l!te['~,~jthl:~:i~~fn~~Lp~t~,.~e;~o~.tIf·d~~osJiC·~i~t;'~~:O~lY}:apaWe.~f"": '. :: .. ~ .. ..
:' 1'.'.: ..; .:.'~' :\ ~~~n:g"lfipe;.Ptmt~~~..is~~re~~~~l?fleet)". J:h~ leSt WIll ~~nt ~ows o~c~~~ctS and: .. " , .'
:;: .,:~: ':'" : .Jil]~ofldQts ~o.~~o'n\1incit~arcllt1)(Prob\~rim:With t:1ie·c~ ril.l~enfo.uheiit~jV\d~~t.< "..' .
~~ r :>:"; :.\r:: ',p~t ~91~C?l4.s~: ~~"~~~d'.t.~~~.i~ ~11 ~ able· to .lJS~. ~c'p~n~~d .t«(C!le.<:K. e?rfr~e?lti:::: .'. ... .. : .'
..1':.:.i.• : .'::'" •.s~pot :llr~ p~nt·~~,!!-~/:<I;1')~ JnS~~f WUr.a(~1·S- ,!!Sis: for .a·card reg!U'd;less: 9f~e pri~t:::· '. .. '.
.'-,') .-;1./:.. :;...: :Jitihi.bit~tiob ~c.- op.Uon"W):· . : ( :;;..... :" ': ..:; ".' : '. ":.,.O.,,:' "~ ":'. ~.'. ".:.:.: . :: '.:~: '.. " '.. ,:."" .': '.
: t·
..... .-; ·1 0; _: . :~.: : .... ".. f:·:.. . ·: .",~. -: . . 4 ~ ~ ~ ....... ::. :.:--.~ :--0.
0 .' ....... . ' ~ ... , . J . :( \ .... f .. .. c.. .... .. .. .... J..... •
.'''.
~ ~
. . . . . .0; '"
.... .: : \. •••. ..' ." :
... 'f
t" -° .·. I ::" •• : •
I
• ...t ...
.. ., \. • .. .....
4 .. :"
J
..
...... 0 ...
1.
•
• ..
... "
"... ••
11", .. ,
:::i t· .::.; :. ::~. ~:: ':~:Foi ins~~ts~With:ihi'~c;K~ p'(i~r)·t;6e ~6':a~tiv'o: to~i s~t is ~riJite~t)Thi~~i(l·lief~: ..,... ,:' ....
.. :.. ~; /. : ~ .:. .:a ttinile& 1echiIic1aD'telt 'at:-4 'glao~"i1-tfierCl'ts .i1tiY.. problem .~~ :thlf data tines '~in'lh;':: .~: '. .
.....,.. ~ ·\··:··\:ibktn.'tm~httoth~eXteilUi:(prln~r···:~.· . ,'.:. ", .:.: ~ ..'; ; :, '. ..
·:~,i: :.:.·.; '.', ';:::'~?: ~:.,/::: ~: ~: :.;~<': .~. \~~:/\:.,:~"':<;~':.'.~', :"<' :.:~';~:.;::~.:': .' .:~ 2~:'; ~:' :~: /;::~ :~ ,.;: ~ :~: ;~. ':: :~ ': . \. '~: :'.;. :.~ ;,:. ~ '.: ,.' :-~: .~. :.
",''." "::: .':'.,t: .'.....
,'''•."n
",.I"'t.J'
:~
."
ReeaJJ' oriRep'·tint. '., \; :.. :-.,: ' ' '.
.. "," . . . . " • 0
~:'::":
~
,.0.",
(/' '.. ~ :., ..'.':'" ..' : .. : '
~/'''''' °o ,.~
j ' : :'. .
o'
I
i
Of" ,0 ... t· • •• - .. ' •• , I, ". ,:."". .. 'o. .. •
·~: .. ·:~~~.;·.::·~·~!~~5'l~t~·~~~tiQ~~i;Q~~1~ri¥~~~1~9~.~o.~~iO~!Q~~~U.~r.~~p.rl~t.tli~~ai~(~h~:~d!~~~~~: ,.. :. ::';: :.~: ....

. . ::.:. ~::~.:':':' ..!r~l!l~.~ p~~~u~~:.~~,!~d,:fi~~:.~~pr:Y~)~c .op~~~~or ~~·iJ~mp~c~ ..t9·p'roVld~.~~.:.:.: '.:,' '..: .
: -:.: ..,: . )';:.~::·.~~~~:.m~~~r :S~ that _~~ .~~X1~y~, ~:~e~~ ..o/?ugl) ,~~. ~~~qrY,'. ~~:fl~d :~.e. ~est .. : .....', . .:
....: ." ~ ~'.. ' 'n:~rd IlJ questlo.Q:.'· ~ ,:~. ,""'.~ .:t. ~\ .., :'..• ,.\ -:. ,..; ". i.:'.' ' ' :~ '.: . " •.... : .,.'~ .: ..
:\ ,'" .~ ':'.: . ::,/(./.~t>::)/.:. :":':'/ .'.~. \ ;~::~::~' '. ":::':.:":. :' "':~ ..~ :!~t;. :;~.:.'> '.:' ~: .:y :.' :..>",{,
::~: '. : :<::=- ~. :.: ;,,:.::.~" . :,:". :. .
: \ .:: !~~.~ ::Y:,~.~~:tf¢o~·~8:~~t;hr.m~
. ~JY~.~11~ ~,C$S~~~:"l"f~~'!<'?~~.WW/z.>~~\:~~, ~~~.~~~~Y;~: :'/~ ~>'.:' '. i :' .
....... . nu$w.lrhap~cnonlyit' ; :. :.,: .; - ,',:. ' '~'... ..,
. i:::'. ~..:~~ ::-':-::':' ::":, ~" '. :.::; t.~::-\ :';; ~~.: ~ '.<: -.: ;'." .: :"
.. .:.... :. '. _"'" '.::-~ .~:1.. 'The.records h'a'Ve'been .d6Wn1oac;leO ·.to a ·PC':..: ,'. '::<;'; .. : :..', :.. ;. ~ : .. :':: I : 1 " ". ::' ' .• :: .~:'
<'. :. \ ,:. ":::;:: :.: ~: r' :~. :':>:~ :'. '> . .\.,.... . \' . .' ' •
... . .
: ..
.:'.,' ~~ :\"
,~ 'r:":-:' :. ~Z:...,'Thc'M:ettior,y F\dl Gptioci is off'an~ tliefustruinenthaS'nUi 'b.Q;t.of'm'emoyY·aM.:: :.•.:., .... , .
, :..,. :. ;;:,'" ,.,.•.• :th'.: ld· '. _.oS_ : ' : '::••• ' : : :: : .: .." •• , ' : •••••
>. I '" • •• ,:
.,~ ...,'.:• •'," t'
~.,
• • ~~.t.a- etas}}
I '".
e-~,. :
"i). recQfQlI,
•
I" .",,'. :. ' . .... •••••• • '.' '..... • "," ... ".' '
..' . ~ '., ,; " .~ ,- .' . ·-:t :~ ··t<~d,whiOh .docs 1l'Qt havp :(he. test 'result \j)~ek ·is 'requcstC(d {Tltc .test restrlt : . '.':. .... '. . 1.
.. '. :" •• 0 . • 0 0 : ...... \_." 00' • 0" '"" • • {" • • \.0 •••• ." .".".. •
;':':-' .' ,::. '::,,~-:,:: ::. ":~'::blo'ck h$thtee.co1Uimi&·J~leaTE$t. ACI.rifd'$/J.:C, a:nd·~·it1W~citthtJt~t:·.:·: :..... ' : ": ",: :
'.:.~ :~.~~.::'. .::.:::, ;"
~. >':..::,:.:t..• ·
~ .'::.>:::::)C¥i~\~c.:.pri~t~}~: !~: ;.~ ~:::'.:. \:.~;< ..../ .:' .
~: Thet~.l'¢coidm.~cstioQcon~eaanerror:.: .,. ",.: . ::.. '. -'
. :.. :'. .:..;;... . <: ::.. . I. :.' ' .. <: :.~": . ~..:., .:'. '~':. :1'
.','::. ' . . ' '; .~
"j .', •
-:.~. ~. ~"' ':'~"-:"':.::. ~

~
•
:, .: .: ·.,·......s...:..nu~t'il~;Storagel.!*-.¢.e·lnt9X11)"~e:.~~b~~l11l]>~e~.,',
.d .: ,," .. ." .... , ••• '
:,.... :..~: .... ~.:"'::;. :.:. :: .~ .' ".
'. • •••• ".," ' • .:. • • r • • ,. .: • • • • • ," •••••• : ••
I
".. : • •,:;,
.':...: I';:'" ~ :;.~

;Y".': ~ ::0'.. :- .~:..: /.~ .~ :., '. ~~ ~ ::~:'
• ': .,(: ::: : ..,••• •. J......'" :'. y • ~'"
• •: o' : .... •••::. '.: .;";: .': •. : ;:'. ,<' • • '.; : .... " : • : •.• '.' '• • l '.:-
..:::.~:. ;:~ .:·<tft~(re:ooi-9' {$'f~un«(~~J~to,xlIy~t wiJI di~l~~ ·~r;fl;N1'.ER ·f· TO. ~~1!I' ~~0tu?, : ',:':....: :.': .' ,'.: I
:' ..•...:; \'RTO REVlJ£W·DATA:U, SeleetthedcslrooQp.tion andpress.ENTBR to PQntiliu.e.~·Wlien· :. ".:.;; .... ':'\'
.:~:: :'.: >: .: :. :.~~Ii i~;~P~~~. to ~,?i~i the ~~fd· ~(~aicr eri~ .~:.di~iiY~{r f?~. ~~~ie~. ::~~~ ':r~i"Js . ~.":,, .:.~'.:';.'. . . . .:.. .
. .:', .:'" ~'.::- '; en.te~~ ~<t.pr~t!r !1' .?Opy of- ~~ !~~otd\~e display. 'W.ill.pro~flt)~INS~~! ~<::~:1~·. T~ .e~lt' .. '. " ~:.:: ':.:' ..'. .
'.," •• ; . , •• J' ,frEl.m:re~8U~.ellter
..'.'Q"~and ~s":Yer (!Y":tt>. tne '.~x.r1;'y !N'rt .pr0Jtlpt:- .:::... :: .: ':' ';..:;:..: . ".; .' '. :....::. '; : ;': ..:., .:. "
]:.::~::~~. : '.~~::;':~>Y~/:~~:~~~~~~J~· ..i ~. ~'j::: :\:;to:'~~':i-~:: ;.': ~'. .~:.:<:)";~.: .'~ ':. ~: }:~~~: .~: : ..·;:/;,j,:F::.: :'~. j>'\ ;.;.'.~. ~.:~::/::.: ~.:~: ~; : ',: :;'.:':.'.;:~.;
;':.:. •''':- :~··1'his-:.optr6.n·:a119ws. t~e' operator: .m.o.mtor.,tbe· mRfo·r.. speed~~· ..1 )e ,di;splay :y.4U· r.ead:,' '.' , : '':
• .,. ." . .".. i-:t ".smJJ" ,~", ~ .~. ~
':'UjIr10:1))R SPE£.D:·.tU:'M trttl)t#.·,.. ··
4 • • • ,'" •• '.'\. • -,'. ,., .' • •
. .. .:: • r • ~ ;. ,'. " ,.:':.. :.." : :.": ..,,,. :.... . ." .:" ..' '.' '; . .,,"
. ", :.
",,' ......
. : .: ." .
.: .... . .:-
• ./t' ••• : ••
• • 1' '. , ... ~ ~,' • ,

..... : . . .... ~
• I· • ' ~,
. ' .. .\ ~ ..
. .T,:'" '.'
303
.'
.' ~ . :.:1· ...: . '4:' ',..:' l' t .~.. ~ ••= " .;. t.·,' • \," . .:', • . .' . .
'. ": ,':' .'
;'." ~';'...
.:u.t.' ~:: .. '.~.... ~ -: . .~ .J' : •.• ~ ': ...... :.:..
..'~ '." ..;.
.".
. '," ::.• • • " ..... . t' l . _:• • ;.
" :..... .',
.,' • "'; t • '. • t ~ • ",; ... ., '.
:.. ......
•
'. ',,~ .: '\. ·';:::·;U"··~;.:··'CijfTei»peratU~~·Sit-iip:F.Qti~6D"~/: ..:.' ;~':.:>-:
'..:.' .'. t"~= .:~ ' •••••: •••••• :, : .,': ~''''':'''' '!", ~ .. .:~:,' :.~ ~l:
>.....:;/.~.:!:;, .:;.:
: •••.:.:. ~ '.; ,',
:... :~ ....,..... ,' ./:' .
:. ":~' • ''':,:'''• • • ; ~ .. ,
.':~: .':, .. .• ", "11Us' item brings up a sti&.n-enu '\¥bioh~a11oy..s. th~.operacor to mdpitar: sampre cnamheJ:,···· '. II • • . •. • • • •
:':-.:~:':-: ....:': . :.:; :\·-temio~~·~i~.~.*~~J~R.j'.:rSs:r~U~~!l ~,.~~Y~tiin6 t~'~~ to·~eJPr.;E MOPB)::~ :-:.. \.: .:' ;.~' .:. \:'.,
>:~ :;':.:' {:.~::~{;';:~i:'~~~;;~ ):f~':;}f£.;j;~r:,~·:)· ':}~.:;,~,'::~::{J.:l:h:·::;;/i;', ..;',',:}:.:. ':.":,~ ~;.; ;::;::'.:; .

'. " .' .. , J.. .. • :. . . .. 'tD",'·:
t" :..
· Dtsple.j1
0.' 0".. Or..
\ :. ... ~ : '.': ' .. '. '.' .;, "".~..
,:f. \".. . .: i/O.... ..,..... '. . .
. . '.' .........
~.. ...
.""', , ~.' . . "...' : . '. .: . ''' . ,.., t"
"j
;'
'.) .. :''': :~.:. ~ .. ' ···.::::~~.~~.?9 ~~, ~isp~~y' tI1C?~~?~tl.t'emp~a~~ ~~:~~~e~C~~tigf~~" ' :,:-( ' .
. :' .. " • ".. :0. ~'. ..: ,.:... _\.0:/ ''''''. "'••••' ...... : i. ... .-'.:••~:~,,:..... ::=: ...... " .' :.... ~ .. :~ . ":: ...: 0: .0: ' '00" ' ',
'.:..'. :.! .<' :.',., ',; > .:':'...:'...... :.
to 1:.', .. : :
""
:" ..~.. . ... ',' "•....,":. ' ::.. ::. '.l ~'p.h
..
~ -:~ .PThit'·Sampt~
J ,.... ..
C;"ambdr
f·~.. . . ,
Temp' eAiiur~ <iata
. \..
;:.~: o. '10 ... ....... • u" .. , ..... 0°.. ~.
,:.~.:::,
.',' ' : .. "::...\..~. ~:;.~ brl~{:s~~ ~r~h~"'Ce~l.teml1qr(1tU#i~ta·is prihtc~, :me CUrr.ent,tompef.atJr~,' .'. '" ....
...... ;:, . ~ '), ;:~:leh1p.~~~:a~.~~~tiQn.iu\dl~~tt~1llv.et~~e.
tfu:¢~)lQJdd~~ar:e,p~tnt~({.:.. :: .... ::. :/ .,': :.~ .
.:;:'. ,: ~.:?::'~;;)::.,.,:.::~\ . : ~:.!::.~ ; '~':':.~:'.:.:':.'='.::/~"' ' ; :. :~:.." '~:."::';'. :.. ..:~ ;:'.:..:.:~.:~. !;' :: ::.'.{..:~.,
..
'
-In''' .:.... \' .••• '. 1'1 "9,";' .. ·Quzfand r~ttitn to the WljE¥ODE .,.,' .... ,.... ,.. . .... ,:. ,... , " . '.' ' ...
:\!~}{(~.:;·~~}:;;;~~~1~i~ii;:~;;2;f:t;;;,~:,t:~:;:::X:.>:'/,;i
~if"·i>:)::·?~.,,:\::.~I•. '~; ':-0):.:::' :. ....
'.:.::: .. " ':; ;~~; . :, 'fhe·.~ti.fton· and: reVi':Mn Ie'f~ts ~r ·the: sOftW.afc. are C,Olitilfneo':wltfUn ·th~ El>ROM. ~f -the- ;' .,., .
·. ~ .,. ~ · \~ ~: h ·,·lri!ltitim~t\ %j9 'iiiforinatiQ"'~U ~~ (fispiay.ed.fOi:~:s.hort .ti~~i· aiid theil'~e.l~trument wit('..' :~,":;.: .:'. .: ,. '.
"...; ~. '.:', ·:·~:i•.'~ iotUn; to Pic'K.oy,&ditrtl opiiQn.fM'enu:· The disp.lay. ~il.hlcl'ud(r:· ::: '.' ~ ...,... '~: ":.. ":'. . . :" ..' :', .: " . (
• .','. " • •, . ' I " •• ' ." 1 ~'80\"tmR t::! hC:'2i Nt: ...;.' :.~;., .•,' .';,'... . \ • '. '. • • . . ... :. • ... \ •••.• • .
. .. .•.:.,,,.~ ... ·.~~;···4.t,J .•..Lj ·:.v~ ~... ~u;"'''''''' '7".:.'.'.~.:. "'l .. ~·";.I.'
· )" .. ":.._.; '. . ~~ .., ~,: ·"sf,i.\.'v.BV5 ~2231 . \': 0., • #. . .' : ' •••••• I'. ':"." ••: ..
;~:«i·,~;;Z.:~~;':i:::\(t.'~~>;~:J:(:.~.::::.; !f:f\:S::: ::.: :. :'. ;': " ~<://:~.>.;::;. ': ',:.' ,: .'
.1' •••••• ' " , . ' .... ' • .... • •••••• ' ' •• ' " '.' ,... • ..' '"
.
·, '. . .~ .....,
':.'~ .., :\:
'. ''''''ustom'Sell!''''''''':''''
'Yl'v. ·r';"~'.
,",
, ~.:. :..
. . ' t ,Vo,':"'". 'I~' "'
". ....... .'/:,' ' ". :,':' '.....,
'to.· ',..
,.... 0, . ':, . /
.. ,',: ."
.: ..I"'
,..' . '.
: •••• I .. : • ..'"
;'. ~':." : : ;. ..: ThIs opti~it :WUl.~et:~l1i.ch ?ie~modo seq,!~n~:tp ·execu~~. hqw to ·.diSPtay tl)e:dlt~ wtte~er '.-... ,'. '. '. .
;' .: .:'.. :!:: ·~::·.)c; Us6'the:'in~~ '1;l~4ar~ ir1·~~.niQdes;,,~l\~¢~i',tO· ~k ·tl?-~:~ata.~tiY gU.e:stiQn8j' ;.: ..
:' \ . ':...:: '.:. ~,':.•.:wheiJlt;r :to- plliI1t ~'. ca.r4:~~ Whctpci:':t~ ..a~tIYate}!ie 'reprint: ciJ:cf opt\Qrl.:: J#.clf op~{o'n' is'"
. i' .' ,.. ,. .. d:isaussed'b~lq~: .. "\ . ~ ' ,:. :'..; ",',: .,' ':'.' . ...•. '. :.,' ! --: .. ' . ".\
• t. :," ,", ••••: . : ••: '~~ .. ' . - : ': .:~.:;.: 4t~~:":-:..I~· ,"
: : ~': ~'. ': ::: ~ "t /~. to:,! -; :. 'e '.~'.. . to.. ~ . ;., .:~ .~. :0.: ;~..\.: ':.:':~. 't... .".: '.~ ::. ": : . ~ t •
'.::' =..... ; '" .:'·:::ti~:i~:~~·.ap'p,~~~~i~~PQni~.~t~:iY.Rl¢ittqY~SU:Q~·.ji1(C'lJl~se·~~l<?~··an~

pre&~.S0~;:." ~ r.·, :',:, ' ..•. '~': .. '.~
".:. :~~"",'" ; "::'~rTo vt~w:~.~.da~tbat.is.-?urt~ntl~1n~cm~"-Sl~P~Y. pr~s BN'TB~ .~~:~ ~t:0mpt.·.lfthl.s,l~. . .; :..: . ~:"
'. : ".. '. :. -: . .'not·UteA~~il'e~ ~~lUe:.)lse·th.e BJ\CKS:rAO~ ·"ex. t9 bac~ ~p:·one.~p~c:e-,. :Wlt<~n ·trio .. , ., .. '.
;:;: .: ~:>: .:C::·?BA<%$.PACB·1~.piCss;e<t:witli-=Orl1yo~e.cb~6ter in t11e:~esporisC!.:the Ptom.ptWilJT~ppetir.r.. ·r.: ," ..::~: I:. " .
.....';.: ....... :: ·:\;.:..)Vlie~ ~~~~P.t~~a:F.~~arir~~ ~'i>t9~)wl~ (o·tY~·~~·.~.n~%re·sP~~e~'~:rPf~~NTER:to~.: ',. :::...... '. ...
'. :: :. .' ",.~.;' :J:evj~vi~~ ~urrent.1.1a!#~ i6l~~er.~~iu~t1?:d ~Tl?R, k41,.to 'fin,a1't~e' !t r.~pons~ .ana ffi;~ve: .::: ::-. .,'. .
'. ". '. , - ". 't' . tl:.· .. ':'''t' p'rn"m"'pt~' :., ' .' '.:: ,., : ',\'. '.. '.,'. :~ '..\..,": ". '. '.' ':.:; ,.;:; ..:,. ;. :':'. . '.. ,.... . . :.
" . ~; •.. 0 • ~. ,"-.. "" '.~ ".~ "," ~. .~ ~"~" .•.• , ." '.,~.
';~'" ;::..<.~':-;.~.:::: .:i.. :.:·· ·~r '~<:;:.;:'~/-):'A(> "?~'.~ . :,'. ",;. -, '" ':. :.;:.: ': , ><:: ;.~:~. \;. :.;~: . :..;:. :. "': '.:' :.'
.lIC.fWl"'> •• ,'"'''''',''' : ••••. "
··.~.~.: :.. :. ':.'~>',\.~ :.. ;.' ".. ': .

r : ',' .. 'I·STD·Tl!lS!I:·(l.~?tt."
., " .. : '., .' :." ;.(,:,., :'..:. ·r.
:':~".:: ,>~ . ;.\;..:}fils~ q~esti#lf J~:;'~~~g: ~h!pli !~~d~J~~~~c~'l~ :~~ecu't6 . ~:· ~:' ~o,t~~iiyie~ '~~~6E}( i~'::':<: ..~. \." .' ::;.: '. ' :
).:.::.' .~:.;·',.:':'~p~.?)e.·of . ~~~:~~~er~~·~~~~t~:.~f~p(:~~,~ ..Tt,1~:~ic~r ..c.~·?~e<::s. W:(;.: ~" :.~:,'>. "~'. "'. ';'. ~
.;.: ,: , •.' :.:: '.' .
':"~:' ;'.~"
: ".; " ~. \.
"
.. ,.
'.
H
:..'" "
" '. ',' ....

. '., .'
.. ' ,
. :.
304
305
".::>;':". '. '.. :.", .':." .' ' . . .: '., .':';: :..:' . . :~. ...:, -.:: ~~:: .,' ," :'. . ...,
. ..... ". '. . . . ..'- .:/: :,~ ::'~.:"'.' '" "'1,"" " '", .: _. . .. .:. '·.".'0 J : : .... :,i." . . ' ••i. • •
• ' l> .0_ .... '0' ;'. '., :; t' wo, ... .... • ..... '. • .. " •••
.": ..0 .: .:... ~ri'OXE~:···Wlien:·the: d~a :enti'i gii~tions.;.ate;~cti'!ated;;

..,,.... '.: ':':- ...: I ... 't'" •
........
tlie ·instf\Sment."stoles ~sUbi.eotl: '....... '. :'
'~.' I' • . . . ."\ + ",' .'
~"'. :::,:' :'.: :.; ',::~~·.o,atiJ?ra~~Jl'..:?i~~~~Q •• el!~r ~(H~~Cjan·s:·}.na~!lte~~p~e; r~CQr,c!s.i~ ..~att'eo/ p:o~boted·.' "", : .. , 'i.: .
t" .,
..5·.::~: ;'.: .:: ~: ...,'. \'. :~fr.n~~.?d: .~<;..q. ~e~ d.~.f;ri~}l~es~i~~. ~'fl:O~ ~E:five" !I'? .4't(l !G :s~~~d~ Jf.Jo~r ~~en~~. ~ ;.:' .': ;". :: '.
;.:.•..~ ' ::: .. !. ~AAs.nd.l~~~.~a~,eom~un1~ti~np~~~ge~aYe.J.~~~~~·M.~.~ptlon1~d~~~Il~~uitesd~ta.~::." : ' .'~' .
• h .~~ ' •• e9tl"Y.1t"i~~ggC\Sted.ft?.tum·O¥F.th$'~l!lQ'J\qry.~n.()pt1C)J;iUSl:ng
" .... ~c.E$C ~·1.. as.des-enDed '.' '..".' " '.'
;}:.,~~:~{><!~~$;l;:.·}~'~~(:·:;:':;-[,:i>~:::: . .~;~. :.'?!~~..:(:',;:f:~:: ;."' .;',: :~., ~':'/:: . . .:.: ·;

; :. '" ,.:..:: ~. JfiS.P9~:li~le}o',iiitiib~~·~~·prlJ?tcr-f(?~.~~tiJ.1g.a prit:l~~ ~~.rd ~fth~~~eatJ.1 test,~ Cho.os;e. ,.:.' /"': '.
.; ,~.". :.:...." ..,' }:',Y-1'.1(:ybu do ~PTwnnt ~io Int0'fi1~r:50.QQEtHo. p.C1I}~ tl'test r~c:~~... qnao~ie ·:-N~· . lf.Y9U .~. ' .
..:, .' . .' '. '. '·no ~t the-lri$trilri1ent lQ"J?iint a test t'eCQtd •. ' ..... : .. :': .'
· .', "''':; ',:.' .'
. ......'. ..' "". ," '.. ' I .'•
. ·;'1;.· <::'~:::":''''::'}-:;::;:. ;:. ~~~ :<: "::.:';'.:' ~.:~~ . :<:~ ~.:. ;~:.:~ ?<':.~\:~<.,,:. /. '., .
.'. ~~P,RINl':.G'RD?ft .'." "'.i"':' ,",.:'" .'.':.'. \ . ','
<:.:.:.::,:<. ":'" <":../.' '.:. ~:'.\ .~.~.: ;..>.. ~ . ::."
.' ,:', . :. .~ .. : . ,.,; .. '.
·~.~;I~.:.~,:·>}~;·. :·. ·:/X!Jt··~~> ;.< ;~::·.::~·'2/::~~~(»:·:~·:(\(· ..'~~':::/\<.~. >:::::.:./.: .~: /~,~; i:::.:::\:':·":·'::.:,":, \:~.: ';;r.\.. .:..:"":.::: .: ..:.: ':~ ::,'
I:';.• ' " ". '. :... nPRINTVOLUME7" .'. ,',. .~. t· . , . .
:.:~:: t*: ~.:.;.:\. ~~} :.... .';" .:.:-::: ::":. ': .. ~.>.: ~.; ~:: ,. '" .-'
: •.•. ' . . . . . . '.' . ' .. ' '••. ,': . . . . '
~~~~
".' , ••• , • . . '
~
.".
. r.:.,. . .:
. .ill , I •••• : '.:. ' •••' • "::., •• -:' • • • "" ••
1.' ., '. ·Wltli.ea~h. btc;atlI test '" ::' :. '.". ., "., .: . . . .'} ' ,.-.. . . .. . .
~ >:" .;,; .:;:.:,....:..~~:,: .:;;.~: :: L:~";;'~::::l"'::::':\' . ;::~. :'.~: :.' :-'l ".:..:(::';:..' '::':: ".:"..~.~.' ~'~. '. ',:- :: <:"': ~ ..:.<': ". ': :..::/:..:. . :.: .<,:.. .',;.:
i
.....:;,:....;.:. ":..' .:" ::'~"'RE:vmW SEWP1t'~~ ':";': ..:':'.:'.:...:., ~ ..; .'.:....:.. ;'::.: .....:..: ,';,"~. ;j' ." ,,t' ..... "';'.•:': ~ " :" ;.,. .; < f
.' . ': lr.::~,:,:> '.~·<i:;'-::.I,~u;~tc..:,aflsfl~a ~tlt:~~~~~~\tiicfY!~ ~ntcir~~'~i1oose l~h ·~iy'~u~~p~l.d.Ii~e'~(i.'do~~'le· .' ".:'
'\. ", ':::" '.:':":check·your·'Mti1e8. ehoose "y''. Jp'REVIBW"MOnE~ the·inSttUment.wHl redisp-lay the".:··· ..
:'" ./:." ;::::: ': ::·:·>·':"·'pip:mP!s.:o".~ a.bo:Y6'.i1~~liUns·.~ ~'~pi~~t is on·:th~;:~n:~i1, :p~~:tN.TER to·~ee· '.' '.....; ."
. ;1' ::':., .;
.~. '~c»tr:"'cuti:ertt;ie,spo~e:: UIl'¢;t!ie:UGt<SP'~C:12 key' ils"necCag~; ~b:'~elet~ t~e:·jCurrel'1t .. ·~ "" ",
:..;. ,. :'.:::"":' : :·:f.6apdnsC'.~Jf·YOQ·diJetti11-~t:t1I'~·~~ ofybur'icspci~S'e;'·th.e.promPt~ihewfu:agail"1" At thot' :" ::;' .'.
.:. i:.;·.;: ..~. : ,J. .,', ~lfl1e;~~·ni:Yo-\ir new~oO$e.8i1d press ENTER t6·c.odUn\ic,.'·· ::'. :' : ~:: .. ~. ' ' :. :.. ,:.' .
):~:;.i:):~~~:;\~t(~. :\~ '.)}).; .~.<~~:'~: :; ;:>~ .'<. ~>~"::~"'~~::::';:';::'.?: ';~./~:.~': ' .:;:-.~:~:>.'~:~'~. : ;.. . :. '.:~< . :;::>.::::./: ~;". >:.~~ : ':~.: i: ::: :. :..":. .....
•: .'~ .' "." "SAVE'SET'UP11J. '.' . ,.... . ,~. .'. ..... " " ,,;- ':" ..... "'. .' '.. .":
·:':f":: )::.: :.~.;: /A1i~ef1~g !~:y.:,l:f~· thig~~e~t~9~ ~li ~~\~~ rj~W::·6op~·~tiQ~".j~tQ ':ili~ ~~«e~ .bickup::·,' :;::,',: .::.--::~ ... :.,
H" .;...
·>. ,~ . '."'.:.:,,' ·..···:,J'iA.tvfi$r~·oftfi~·instrulPeht:: ~.-wiJl pr~~~~~QnfisYrati6.iuj6·:thatcaCij·iim~tJlarule·:

:.:.':_.'~~;~.; ~.::~:,:~ :~:/i~:.~~~~,~~~i~~.~::~.~ ~~]\~:~~~~~ ~~:~:~~·~~7.~;~~~.~~ ~'> ;:f': ~~::.::' '.'~"": . :':-:"~: '::'';:- '::"::.: .
.:.. ,.',' '.:~:. .. "'_' :.,'.. !fi~u go ~Q~,W1sh to sa\te t1,i~ n~Y"~<?nfi~tlon. ch~?s~:th.~:..~t ?P~fol'\: Thi~ wilrteavfth'e:' .....:,!'. " ,
.
';'iII!:< ;::::: ;:·.c~~~t..~oPf!gu~~~Oh ~~~~g~.g:·;.:Jn.'ei~~r'¢as~, th~:I?s.~m~n·t:Yrill..b~ z:et~~e.~ t?,\~~ :<>., '.. "':.,
:;:1'''';' :1...:.'..~: : :KelQO~ Optlpti~ Nfenq fOJ'f'tiither t~ng.of m6dific;ati<?ns. \'..:;:. ':'; ~.' .: :' .. :,: "'.: ..;.ft , :.... '.:. .:' ....: ••
:,~';:.~\~.;::::>;~;~):~:.~rJF(;~\~;~~,l:{tU:~~~~~{)i:~,;:: :.;:~:;:r;:~;},~.~.':~S~·;t l/:i~::.•.,:. ;~,:.: :" : .'. '

:'::1:' .:~"\:" .,; :···:::·:··:.:.:ihis.~pi~oii.;'uI~~:~e s:uperv~sdi-'o.r·$~~f~~~ t~:.s~~ ~ f~ge! '~~~ile 'fo!.~~·eit~~al ....:.:'> .-:'.. :-,'" ':.,.,. ,
::'1. :.. . . -: :";.:. ···:.s:raffdJir.il.to·be:us..~cl; dutixi~.th~'p~tll?11Itl,on
e:heek crf'all'tests;: ,If.¢.e ...:' "::.' . ;.: '., '., "
·.f, ....;.." . : ~ :...: >sftU1darcl.' either wet bath Qj<'tlxY·g~~d·~ O~t. of·i6[6r'anc'C·;. tl'lt;:.~nstr1lIrient WiU"eEmc~l fhtn;sf':' ..'.',.,';' '.
pqnJ~b c~tQi:nal .~:
':':.'~ :,;:..::.;:'.:"·'.)·f ~_a~~·pfi.~t,~::~~·t ~~s~~.g¥/~i~~~i~~~:·i~.~r~~:1~~~~:~uh~.& ~ ·~f!h?~i;~or}:.s~q~q~~~ (:~.<;")~ ~Y.':·.· . ,'· .... :" .'
.'
. '.'
306
.. .. .
...
..... .
t·-, ", '.
: ~ ~~:.: ~ "'\'.~
"•••••
.,
t' ,* ' .'
.~ • .".::. . :. *. . '.'
.. " , '.
,'
......
''''.' ••• - ii' : .,'
:'.,:...~~:~:. .....:. . ..
• * . \ ' ' . ,'''''..
~.
.,'; i':
' .. .'
, .
., .
"0 • I •
" ,
" ..
,;" ,"
, '
." .•..... '........... . ." " '., ~
: ....:::. '.:.
'"
. ", .... .,'
.. : ';" '.' . . -, '

",
'.'
...... .::;" . '. :.. ~.' ..: " ',.:
" . :',., ,,::. '.:: '.<::.. :',,' . , .' ,

~: :.:. . :,:)('.::.>',~': .:. . >::;~. ~;~:~::.:I.
'. '. J •• -,
,........ • • .' ••••. ,... ~:.'. . .1,' • '
".
, ... \'.. '.' '. >..... .: ': \ . :::.:' 0·: .. : :.., .. , I ~. . ;:,:. ....• •'. '<•• '.
.... • ". .' to: :',,:. ,~ .,,~ " , • • ;', • • ".'. • .. I •
'~'.:'\ ',' '.: ... ", . :~., ;.:':,0, . ;'-:,'.'... ,.;. ~t. ....:•• '.' • ".:. • ,,;_ ' • • . .- ";
. .' "
•••••
, ·tt
I .... ':..
.. t....
'.
".
'.;:'~', ,,': • • :~..
.'~: :..:
1 : •••••• : • • • •
'." .,~ :':~~

I " ....
'/ :;' .:. ,,:

~..
"
.
. " ."
':.. ~;~.:~::':".;;.':.: :.,:.':-<;.:::.>;::l.':;·"'. .::'. :::;;('. ,.:.'.":.:': ~ ;.: ~:

"
\.. ~. \. .; ,. :....: .: :". .' "

\" . .; .. •• 't· ", . '.: ~ :,'. .o, _.' " J•• : .. ; .•.••
:. \ .:.., J , ..''.' ' ... ' .. "
'. . :• f .
. ..,: t.. .:. "'\.: ..
...: :·'.0......"\
' ',
1.
. ·t
,
"
..: . ; • • • • • • • : ••••
'
•
•
,
" _.
...,
: "
~.
•
• :. ~a
._:
&. • •
." "
.'.
'.
..
",.
•
&" :.: ••.•~.....
•
•
.' .... '.

h ~ : . : , ; • •:•
.• •
: ••
,. ", "
: ••••
'
"
. '• • • •
.. '
'.'.
••••
"
'.~ .:..
. ". ;:':'.. :.= :',,::' ....":. ' .. ' ".
";\::~'.' :~
1. .. ". ••
I ••• " ." • "', : : .. ":; : • '. : • • • •: : .
..... ;.'.~, .... ;" •• : to. : .', ••• • .' .' :" .. : f.-·· .' #
.'.', .., , . ..... '" "' " .• :; ." ..' :~. '.:Of' .... ..'; . '~' '.' ':.•
.. , ..
,:,:.~: :'~>: ::'::':~ :~,i;: .: t:~i.~.:~;' . .:. ~.':, /L':: ';:'~ '~:~:e,.:~'.:,: : : : . :
.~ '
.:O,!~~ .
J•• ••••,.::_.,.·:.:. :" , ,. "
.I·.·.. · . .:......... _/: ... ::~
.' ..'.' : '(":".:'..

I ,/ , •
. .'':';. .::::'.: :.: . ':.~ . . '., . ". .'~ .'
...;.; .... : :';,' .. \'.,., .

. .... ,'.
. ......
.
. ,' :~':::':~: "::~/;\'i"~
...
.::::'
'.
././,.. . , '
' '. ::,' :" - -- '; ..... :~.
' :,'. .
.... "
. ',,, ' . , ~'.~ ;;' '-'. .":
;,
. :.,
. I.I.. ::~... :.~,... :':.~.:~:: ..:. '.: "._ ~.:'·.;l·;' .',
.'
.., ,
: .....
.. :'.: . ., :#" ~ • , ':/.'i .... '. '.:" ,~ .:".
::: ).' ;~~ , . .... ." " . .' ." " "
• .... 0. '. • .,'.... ' > :. ,,' ••
~ I':~
:
.' ',t .~'
. :', "~" .. ':. :'.~.: .-: ..,.. ..:.:.••....•...:..:.~::,\: ....•.::... :~.:

•.. ': ':'.
~:_ :,0: .'~., :':.."...'......... _
,' ..: .. '. ..... :
. .~
. ::~- . . l.··: ....
. :......' .
... ' . ... '
.: t" • J. :'.
'. ' •• 1° .... ~.

'Y :
• ~
'.
',.;
' :
~ ~j ' .
.'".
...
", • ,
: ••• :, • ',,' ...

/.\..:.:: .... :.:....•:-...::.:•. .: •.. ..;.:~~.:.:.
:.·...·0.:·. : ~;. ,." .
'.' . :: '; \':~ ,-
307
.. .'. ...... ...... .. .., , ' ..
. '.
• '. ,> "
~. ',. ~. '.
.. "...... .... ,'
J< ...
. ..; ....
.
,
I
...... "
'.. .
: ,.0
I ... .. T',' .'. ''\ :
,,'
>. .. ' ;~ ".:: . .... " • '0, '••:
" ,'. .......' :. ..
"~." ~
. . '
k".
• v
'.' •
•••~' i'... . '~:, ,! '.' . ' t " ..
' .':J 1
'.
,';
,
...... .
.- < '.'
..
. '. ~
. .... ~'. ':. .... ..." .,-.. '., . "S~d.,,~ab5'J4f(iil.e .' . " : ,.' ',' ". '. .:'~.:',
"
:7\i\Ft::::<.:;.?};:.:,:'>~:.;: .::.: ',: ,:':

I
':':':t;~:,}:.:;,~'+:;j\:.';;); ;:;:tit :\iP:;;h)~ f~~( :}':::::.

...: ~.:,,':': -:.}~i~.~a~.~lb~.~.e>In~~~6.o?O~:~~·~used.~fh:~s~~rt~.:Up.ijIl1~~'.W1iynU,le..,. ':. '.
1::,,:,.' ~,~... ".. t'power'SWiieb'Js·p~s9d;tlie'b;1stnnnentis.P1
'".4., ..
STANBBY MQOEtl~ st'ANbB:rM6E>E~ ,:., \'. ..
'11"'\0 v'· . '.'.' ',' ...
I. ••
.'~"'. I~!'.
:i ~'-'~~
IlL:• ',' • :... • .•..••...
:~.~::~. '::~:"': {)O~~:is.ap¥.4C9·,o~1. .!O ~~' he~efs."P. ~l? 'mll~ent;:~~r ~;-t~B.~ .~ODB c.~ De e&;811y .."
·A ....
...... '; :'" " '.:: poted.~bedapsc·,the tUspJay WiU.~·bJ8,nJn,U1d·the red P9w<?r'b,titton:.w.t.1t,b~·H~,.~Pt~ss th~
.~:.:: ,":~:1, ;:' ;":t•..$:rAR'f.TES'Ubis~on:\().il(:UYatetheinsitvm·ent':'· ".:!' .. " :. ":'.," :: ;'.' '.:.'; .
.' '*" ":.: .", ;'~.:::.":•• :" (:''',:~:' • •::••• : '.: : ::.: "..~.~, . . ,. o'~:' :.~.o'
~~."i.': .. \:: •.. ~.......~:. :.:" . +~ ~.~ • • ..... './~~ •• :~':: ~~.:·:l.'· "
.: ....:. ~. ;... ,.:,.... ~~n·~ . ¢P:~~ ~t~il~y~~ :t~ liimci~n azi~ M~t~l!t~. t~~ i~~f w~lt tAke '2~' ~tl~~ek
..' ~" :. II::':.':' '.' "We,rin up' ~o ;tPc1. propCr. q-peratiilg (~pc~ture, be~Qre jC begins-.d~p.gitO·8Ucl and lllO'\les .into
'0 : : ,
,';'", , tbo'I1;>'LaMODB' :., :.•.:: ...•. ".-: : : ,:' .:.,: ', '.' . :".
'.-,:.:. >,:~ ".>::.'.:
.:.~:: ~.: ~:.:
:;i, .~\~.: :;-: \ : . :.~': ••:.~~ ..• :~~..:::'. ~:' .:.(./;:.):~:.:'./.:.:"::;: : .•.•. :'. ::~: :',' :'/.< ~.: '.:': .;.~(:::.:-.: . ,.' .~: ," .'
~::.':,.:~~:!. :~·;::··n.:~eji:tli~ .i,~~~(~:~JO~CdJ9 !'tJ~e; q~l'" f~~: ~SC.:~S.C: ~ a~oYe.)~·.an~ .gG)i~tp \ -: .'.
:;: . ~;' :::,.:;':..; S.TA.NPBY'1v.tGP~;power js.ieh\o~.to tlie prpcessQrancla1l o~th~.tnovjt)g eehlpnnents. :. , ..
~'.~ \:: l' : .:: ·.,.i ;.:-::l?OVicr~td tli/i vaiioiUi.peat6Q.i~.niariita1iteu so 'ih~i t1le·i~~· remains'warm:> When ~a. ' '.,
' .
.":':. ".~.:.....' "..::. 5tnStfUm~rit (s-;eaotlylit~.w·:PressUig tii6"STA:R't TisST:.bl,itton. 'in? instrunieh\:Ydn,o'nl~' '. ~
.:"~)/.:~::.~j:.: ~e~ tW?ni~u~~"~:~~':~~~~f¥~,~~t~~ the.di8i·~!?-stic.te~:~~ ~~:iJ?,~.~:~9l).E . ,.,:'{·:
. '
"..: . i 6 ..... , '.~.' •• / '0" • •: .:.
"J,~ . .
. ~ r~ ':0
.......... .0. ......: .:..... ......
'r •
. -'
..•.. ;.,-.;: ... '.:)..:.: . ;
•" .0 00 : ; . , " , :,
'
• ~ ....
t.·. ..'
~
'0 ',:
." ..
,"e.-.,.
• '; -{: . . . . 'O ~ ,'". '0 " '.:. " .. ,
...
.,. 'Oi
...
:.... ".. '
...;.' '}"" . . : :.'.... .

'.'
:
.; .'. '
,
..'.
'.'
'0''':· ..
•
".
t
;; .' '
.... .ll·. • . . .
.; ·~ . . r;...:. ,. :. " .'''''. '
.. • • I •
", .~:'
'.
..,
' ,
.'
........... .. " ~ ,
.. ' ....
. ,. "
-, .
.:..."
"
...
,"j
.:: ,
' . .
.... .... '
. ,". .
.;
~ ..:.-:. '
....- ',':. :
":--.; :. .~. "
.,
308
.,
" ' :'.~ ,j". "
:' ...... t,'
'. ., . , -.. , " ,
t :.~ ... '" ' " p' h.
, .':, .
'.
I· .. _
.. ' "
,\
" .
.:
"
'. ~ .
.
. ....
... \ , t,'
. ':'
309
." ..'''' ' ':"
•• •• ~
,,',".:>':,."\:'
.. • • •
..;.' '" '.' " ,';. : :',,' .'.
'. 'O' •
.
•
~'.
"'
". :".:', .
!".• :
, :,.,' <.,~:
,
, ~.~
•
~
'. ,•••r '-:••: ••'~.', ! .' 01. " ". ·~·"'.r·;· - " f .' . '.' .•' • .'••.,.•...:.'.~~ ••}.... .' ',' ..' ". .....• /-: .' '. '., ": • .-
_ ' •• ,".",,' •• ,0-.' ••' 4 : .. ', .:.:~:. '0' : '.•, • ", '. " ~ , • ;:
t': .'
•
," >0,.:.. '~.. .... • . ", .~." '0' ' ••., • • :~ • ·.~·1 . '.
, .
.. ·r
"
:}- ,. ~ .: ~ ·~./f;\\~~~~1::rnS~ *o\~~s~~s~~~·~i.tQ~ ~?8. ~irp~; .~~ ~vide~ce·~~ w~ p~1~ea·'if9~~ ,>:'.... .". ..'..
-:.... " . :'. :.':... ,....~~ ~teri 0;' the- h.\~~~cllt~~ ..~~V. ~~cq.uate~~:p~g~d· th~ .'S~p·Je··p~~~r:,:'f.he .;' ,':' .. :
· .~:' :'," .:: ',' .In.stniiPen~ca.ndels th~ !6St-' p·tint:(~tlNVAJ,.lD. tes1'1.·.(if the:eVichmCe,card Was qQt pulled.' ". . :; ....
.... ~., .:,~' / ttol.tiih6':rrlil~l}ar(~·Pl~~:ifself.tO·bOgtii.!ql6Uitirtesi: ':"'<" :.;" ':, <'".:<.. ; :i··.:..•y .:'..:'"
I" • ... -:~.: A.:.:I·.· ::: ::..· ,;n; ·':·';"I~·:":t..'.~·" : ~.:.' :. .: :.: ..::.' ~
:\'-:: :'~:,,: \~.~'\\:: :·: ·~·,••:,· •• III." ·: ..
, :'::. :'~':' .... ·:\~~.~~.~en~·t~;~:k'1ii~.IP.~?i·lviOC>~.l)~~in.~\)~~r~~t··~yp~~: 0~si~T;:. ::'.:,.. ::. ...

i.' .;.;. .. " '. ". ::rn$J.p~om··
Make ~ th!d'th'~ s11AR.T·TBST· buttqn t~ p:usned -oql}t 'a,t t:qe p.ro~ time'';:· .
; . ; , h ••: : •. . : . . f in
\::··ah(rthe.:·e~mf1n'Ce.:dald n:mainS tlifC.nrd ·slot· ui1til'"tlie: hi;tru'riiept,:rbl~~·'it. .'If the:' '.' '. "
q
· \':"::".. ;: . '.~ j~~~1::~~1n;~1~la'f~:~4ID~ fcil.ln~tlit~e·Put~~.{I~ir.~~~):or~imlti~D .. :: ..... ', ..

: .< :.,", ·:.~.!}~11if!ie.[~~~t·9~.an.~~nZ).lJ.t"li.~p.ai.rteol;1DIeian:I.;:'. '," ~::'" :-::'.. " ; .... L.· ::"~.'
./:; .~. ,. /;·:::.:·.:·:~~~~~;~~t~~::.·~:;.·~.~;.~·::~/\:·.:
., •.. ::';.: '. ~;~. ::.Tb~ i~si:r$n'en,Ntert;.(;t'ed:·i.~sU\UU ntOiith:'~Icohqt:iti:the 'subjeot~a br~th('$8tpRM; ":n,r;.; :, ...,'.:.: '. :
:~;'~:~'~.' :~(. :.~f<:~· I:.:.··. .::· ~ ::i:' ·Y:,:J~>~':'~,X:: ~'~.,'::.\:, ' '~: :':.: '.~::~
..'.'.. '..; ..~ .':'" '.~: "ilisJ~~t:~~p1et~ ~:~siCl~ ~~~~~ P.rl.nilf"INVi\.~I~:r.S~MP~.E· ~~t~'lq' p1a~e of, ....:';':: .;: .
..:.: ~. ·i· .:·.:.<:'..~~~O/;1.1:}~rr;;;t{Jit). ~ p.~~~~ ~tse~~!<ip,e~~.~~4e~ t~~V.::·:, ~. ':'::"":'.::: ~~.:..,,' :.;,;":. '.':.~. : ,:::
.. <::"'~~.':~.:."" ..: ~~".l"
,:' -. '.. '~\;·"1~.: ~~ ..i~::-:::::f··~·I::::~·:'i:~ ~ :.~:.:.:~>~ :..~: . \: / 1,:.*." ~. :! : Of",
'r' \ /.. i,.;:,f':·:.':.~inc(~e. ~Qnila~··hit~.:pr?~s~:et~qaic~~c'~i~uai: ~o~~· aro',?~ol :Wi:~ 2.Q~?i.i'n~teli)··. "., '., :
'." ~ \ ..";." .. ;~e.rY~.a;e $'tlbjoe,t'fOt ~tl~st'2~mhi8~ b.eforC: b·egirinirig.~other·br.e~artalysis/·Durini .. : ::., . :.
, ;'" ,<:;; :. ;·:;the 6~atian tUtlc, tb~·Slipj.Odi.:t:nai not §!'Aoke;: ea~ drl,nli,·:orjntrO<fube.any iUbstancb into: .. ';. .'
,..\(:.;. :::':;:'>;T1i~~!n~~.~: ·:F.Uttjie.rm.~r~~:4(.tlic:siibjtct"ie8·i}i~.t.a~~!i;;.ri~~e.~~ :t~e ~d ~~~~Y·.h~g!~g:a: .; '..". ".
....•. . ~.~ .. ~'QrcatJi anMJ'sis'for atIcast 2U mhiuti:s, ~~. 'd"';,' . : .' :. :'.::>: .. ' :":., .: .:-' ,
'" :./ ....:.<..';.'..':: :··~.~::~,::'···:·· . ;;.;£;ft':::,,i'..·..:y;:>~:;<::.;::·: . ·"~:. :.;.~., : ' ..::,.:
""~'~l'I'l't»~RFI'~";
:/':':>:/:~.(.:': .;>.'
', ..-.;'. ',.::
(:. '" ~..>:
",
': .:
,
:"'"
..
.... . ::o.~ •• t.f " r ~: .. ··:... ·I ~.; ,". 'f" 'I:· l.: .' '.~ . » ••••• , ~ •• " . ~ .~ ,
", .". ,.,' ·:·::··~.Hign·tev.el:tadlfdreq,u6p.o.y·ln~erencc ts present....:rhe lnstri1Ip~nt·ha1ts the~test, print's·: :.' " .
;(Y-:·.' ;- :.::': :~~~7ED',Il,fI: .:.J1f.'fAiiD T.E~r~ and.. p.re'pa~es· it~elf: t(>:'staJtt·.~o~er test..: If the: ,.; .. ' '.
, .:.\': r.~. > ... ~ent is ~et m:+~I;?y~:n:;S~.':Whcrr ~.i:Ii~:f~~ricy:i.n~erfeie·nQe'aoti.~a~··t.h'C RFI ..~ ,':: ,
.: . ! ~: ':.:: .;.;.' J·dete';ki;-tiit:.Ifl~inenf~s to t!N01" REAJ;>Y'~·roliowed·by the dbignosti~ chC9ks. ':. '. ",' .'.: ..,. '. ",,: .
;..,;: ,';'.: \:'.':::;' :.X'.(,."....(.;:.;~:: 3:-':..~::·t'.~~~:·: . .::-. :;:.;:........ ~:: .. ~;.-.:. :..:.':.;::-:~.::' ;'::.-..:' '::.=:,-..::' ,..:.~." :.• ,:'/:> -"; . .'.' .'
,..::.... . .:.,'. '. . 1PQate. ~e;~~':~;FSi:5~~ ; ~.d: ~i~~,,!~ov~.:~~~.o.~ :fr~ .1;h~' {[JS~~~.~ b~e~a~~9ri~t .; : :.: . ~":'.
;" .... ,.: . :. ;. ',;. ":'. ·c:;.ov.!PJ,~.~n~ or
~OV~ :th.~ m.s~ent ~.!l' pe~:e.nv~~~~en~ ft~e fro~ ~l, .' [.., ' ..: . ~ .:'., :". ..' '.; , .'.
, t ?:': .:.':':'.:. ~.:·.: . :~~iJ~;~~iN~~~.~.· '~:~.~:.:;: ::~::. '. ~~::-:. :~:\. <:.::.'..:::.:. ;: :.~'; <~:; ;::';;\:'.::> ?~. :':/:.':: :~"/:~~'" .:. . ;";:.' ~..':. :.
~" '.: ( ..:. / .. ':::.. :r~fS::~~\?je:Ct .d.ld. ~9j.'· pr~~~:. 1(;1' ~~eq~tc ..~1?J:~ih: s.ainpr~:" Wi~{d 'three:tnip'u~S; . :~h~'·· . '. ~ , :. "
. .".~:...:.:' :;.": ... trts.~~~ .d~sp.Iayf'll1~tlr:.F1C~!:8~d-col"ft.Ple'.~~· th~ .llJOdi:.~SF.quc.i1f::~. /f:~e·.h~,s~ment.'" .' .'~' '...:. ','
.:.;.~ :: '~.' : ...:;.arso·iddjeate3·~'lMSUFFICmN1:S:AMP¥.gty·on the.ptint~d'~d: ' ..: :", ;.': ;: ".' ":.:.' ' .:' .""~ "~ :,' -: .
":;'\.:::" .~.~~·;::~~·::::(F.; /':'. ~;~:. :.~.<.::-:.~~~, ';<{ :.~.:::.'-} ~ ~ \ >.:".: . ::'~~::X-\.::.::;.'~:~.~.~ . ':. ~. :';". ,='" "/.~:,: ::>:." .~~:.} .:.:.'.:. :'. :.:. ~.:..'... :' :'.
.. ....~;. ,. ..:;.:.'~ N'othUi!i·jd.·,Vn:-o'ng:;.¥i.tlJ."the:)ns~:wilet1t;, ·ltismJc!.~tfie.subje~tto·'c..O~tii".tie;bl6.w~g .until'·his· ;.; ..,." .
.:'.; ~.:·:··:"~';:·1tIf.t~·~adty:;iscOmp·!et~!i1·.e.xh~ti~edd·:~··· :--,.!'. . \;~.:::" ;:",.'. <-:: :,-: ;.,' ., :..:'.';':' ':. :::,";: ': ':: ~'..
:-" ' ..... ..

.'
.. .'. . '.~. ':,. r • .... ;. '.
· " ... "

,.' ,.'
,. _._~._-----
310
. .... . . : ... , ,," .
" ..•
.. 'f I~
'(Of"' :•• ,
..
. , ." '
.'
.:',".'..~.: . ....,.'" . .~..... :.~ / .,
"~'. ".~.
'.. , "" ' . ~, .

.
.,
" . ., ; ' ,'. 04.; ... , ....
','
",
. "t......': . . ;::....
:'0';'- .:' . ..~.
"
'.,
.:. ......
i, J' :,
.;
:'.
.~~ ...
'. "
"
.' " .~.: ".~ ...
,·l
~'
b'"
':' ',:1
".,: ,I
It
" . I'
,
;
r
j,
; • 0'
i.
.-.
i-
/'
"1' .,
, \ ,
.j
.i
<t .:. I
J•
.I
.. ~
. '
.~."" ':.. ", . . "j

, ;
····t
.'.:.. i' ........
," f>.,
·...:1;.
.',. '"
. ":-:.
..
..... -', .:. ... " " f"- 1 .
.' .. ,·t···
:
t. "
• •. :. ... :
.... ..
i~·
. ': .
.'..•
.\ '
. -: ~. '. . .. . ... :. ~
-.', ... " :,0
.t:.
, ., ..•. :. "
I .......
.,
•
: ..
I'·
~ ,.
311
"
", ~.
, .......
... '
:- :~ '..
,
.'.;'
'
.. .. ' ..
~
.; ' .. ~". .:". ",:' ~.: Ii.; • ': "

.: .l
...... • ' , : \ .:J •••• '- . . . : . . . " ' •
'. )
'.
#' : •
.:::;~<f.~': (
, ' -'. ,.
".'"
.,:.. . .
•
.J
• :.
.,f
.' ','."
'1
••
."
~
•
•• :~'. :' ••• <' ~
. .... :
...... '. .
',:' ,:::.:., .;" .:';' .. '.. '
~
.I ....
312
.. '
.
.' :: .
.t.
"
.
.... "
. . . . ,J
: '; .. ~
, .... : .. ) "
" "
.'
.. : :: ..
" .
"
...
..
'
..
,.
' ..'
" :",
..
' • 1
. .....
,
,_
,,'
: .
'"
. :•• 0
"
:.-
... '~ .. ',:
,,' I' ... ·
.:' : >':>.:.: '. :~i~~.:~,::,~.'·.~:},':·;)·>.::·> ;',: :',':.

313
. ", , .',. ': ."
~ .... ":,' :,'
'. ' ." " .
"
" ..
,
• • .:':. '0 '±'" ':~ :<'..
. .. ' .. . ........ ,.. .. ...
:\~.~ ' .~'\
,....... 1' .:: '::.' <'. . .:: ~ .. " • ~.
~ ~ ,
..
: .'..... '.1 ...
".. . ." .f ,'. :.
, ,"
";.'" :
.. '"
",
.'
'. • •••••• r •
., .
, '
." ".
314
EXHIBIT K - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

Printout Reflecting The Readings of The
Calibration Checks
(pp.314-315)
Received:
315 Yay 15 2012 03:1Op~
00'1 PC'J.';
nrreX:ILYZER - ALCOHOL ANALYZER
MODELS'DOORN SN 68-0111.9.7
1'2/03/2011 '
TEST '%BrAe T):ME

~1l BLM'~ .00'0 13:10BS't
CAL.t:!BHCX .1:02 13':10BSi'
AIR BLoANK iOOO 13:11EST
·CAL. ~CHSClt .10J. 1.1:11:;88'1'
AIR ~riaNIc .000 13:11as~
CAL. 'dtBtK .102 13:X1;BSp:'
.AIIt'~ .• 000' 13,:1~EST'
CAL.' cRs.~K .102 13 :12~S.T
AXil. ' ,BU\NJt .000 13:12BST
cAL. ~CK' .102 :t3:!3BS'1'
i;tJBliANK .000 i3:132ST
NO,OFSAMP:t,l!:S: 05
~.:""'. .1018
8m. J)JNTATtoW: .0004468
316
EXHIBIT L - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

Inhibited RFI Printout
(pp. 316-317)
Received: 317 Sep 24 2012 10:13am
VERSION Gl776. 1
SN 68-012478
SLAVE 75 2240 TIME 17:48
DA~E 11/16/2010
INVALID TEST
INHIBITED - RFI
318
EXHIBIT M - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

Interferent Detected and Subtracted Printouts
(pp. 318-320)
Received: 319 SeD 24 2012 10:13am
SN 68-012478 VERSION G1776.12

SLAVE 75 2240
DATE 11/16/20).0 TIME 17:55 EST
INVAI,ID TEST
INTERFERENT DETECTED
Received: 320 Sep 24 2012 10:13am
007 peT
INTOJetLYZER - ALCOHOL ANALYZER
MODtL 5~OOEN SN 68-012478
11/16/2010
TEST %BrAC TI~E
AIR BLANK .000 J.7:56EST
CAL. CHECK .094 17:S6ESIJ:I
AIR BLANK .OQo 17: 56ES'l'
SUeJECT TEST .090 17:57EST
rN~ERFt~ENT SUBTRACTED
AIR aLAN~ .000 17:5BEST
321
EXHIBIT N - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

Invalid Sample Printout
(pp. 321-322)
Received: 322 S6p 24 2012 10:13am
007 PC',t'
INTOXILYZER - ALCOHOL ANAJ~YZER
MODEL 5000~N SN 68-012478
11/16/2010
TtST ~BrAC TIME

AIR BLANK .000 17:50EST
CAL. CHECl< .088 17,50EST
INVM.ID SAMPLE .XXX 17:51EST
AIR BLANK .000 17~51EST
INVALID SAMPLE
323
EXHIBIT 0 - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

Invalid Test Printout
(pp. 323-324)
Received: 324 Sep 24 2012 10:13am
SN 68-012478 VERSION G1776.12

SLAVE 75 2240
DATE 11/16/2010 TIME 17:58 EST
INVALID TEST
325
EXHIBIT P - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

Insufficient Sample printout
(pp. 325-326)
J 326
007 peT
INTOXILYZER - ALCOHOL ANALYZER
MODEL SOOOEN SN 68-011476
06/26/2006
TEST tB;r:AC T!~E

AIR BLANK .000 17: 39ED'I'
CAL. CHECK .097 17:39EDT
AIR BLANK .000 17:40ED'I'
*SU8JEC'l.' TEST .000 1'7:43EO'!'
ArR BLANK .000 17:43EDT
* INSUFFICIENT SAMPLE - VALUE
PRINTED WAS HIGHEST OBTAINED.
327
EXHIBIT Q - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

NYPD Maintenance Log for each
Intoxilyzer SOOOEN machine
Operated in the City
(pp. 327-329)
. .
J • 328
INTOXILYZER 68..012478
DATE COMMENTS (
'J.II'-I cf?( S;Yp . ...:>e - »: \')QU6~ eM(\ 1S ¥ ~,o. cR4: .

(;.:l'':'>-\-'" ;:"'bo seT. Jet DR9£CQ'J-. ~Y\.e..::'N
"Me C~1fC<=S-= 6.Q?s=e~, 9\.) ~o.rx\6.zr,'>
,~.)~ ~
, ·J/~~o1
,3 L
b i\:)1 " .,(. . 0~\.
;/,);1/ S;h. ~/'d~;:~i &/11 101ft? It? 1c:127c7
W' /~ 5/h? . ;CJ~ 6/2- '":l- .

329
"..
INTOXILYZER 68·012478
DATE COMMENTS
) /tvo- j"J Ire 12 II- C (A. > CA ~ 2 ItJ + (0). 7 ()
~6i{ I
1;/0(((
I
(II/.bt
f..fJ
'IJ.-() li( .5,';..., s.jl ,.6·..{r......, L,J,f ((OlC> fJ to'/-' (IOVO $,1., &1!2-:'(f'J....-o~"~~
yfJ--Ut 5/1....- ~ p" st.>(.... h~, <\ be'''''' J ,,-, (~f- frd '( d .
Sl~ l ....f,'" og 9 (}-J-
. {(I'dlll .£/,.,.-1","0 ~,1l ... hlJ~ C b ....,.,. "", ~..... Lrl-7:fI/d H) tJ
,\-,. 5i ~- {*-io.Pt ~ ( Q. b
( ,
."
330
EXHIBIT R - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

Excerpt of Transcript, Dated July 23,2012,
in People v. Alvarado
(pp.330-341)
331
,
CRIMINAL COURT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK
(
2 COUNTY OF NEW YORK PART E
3
--------------------------------------------X
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Docket No
4 2011NYOI0115
-against-
5
VANESSA ALVARADO
6
Defendant.
7
8
--------------------------------------------x
July 23, 2012
100 Centre Street
9 New York, New York 10013
10
11 B E FOR E
HONORABLE, JENNIFER SCHECTER
12 Acting Criminal court Justice
C~
13 A P PEA RAN C E S
14 FOR THE PEOPLE

CYRUS R. VANCE, JR., ESQ.
15 DISTRICT ATTORNEY, NEW YORK COUNTY
BY: MIREILLE DEE, ESQ.
16 One Hogan Place
New york, New York 10013
17
FOR THE DEFENDANT :
18 ADAM D. PERLMUTTER, ESQ.
The Law Offices of Adam Perlmutter, P.C.
19 260 Madison Avenue
Suite 1800
20 New York, New York 10016
21
22
SHERON JOHNSON RPR
23 OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
24
( 25
332
PF.OCEEDINGS
1 THE COURT OFFICER: Calendar Number 7. Vanessa
2 Alvarado.
3 THE COURT: Good morning, Ms. Alvarado.
4 THE DEFENDANT: Good morning.
5 THE COURT: People, what is the offer or
6 recommendation today?
7 MS. DEE: Yes, Your Honor. Mireille Dee, D-e-e.
8 On behalf of the People of the State of New York. Good
9 morning, Your Honor. Good morning, counsel, court staff.
10 THE COURT: Good morning.
11 MS. DEE: On plea to the charge, People are
12 recommending $500 fine, the Stop OWl program, siy. months
13 license revocation, 5 days of community service and
14 ignition interlock device.
15 MR. PERLMUTTER: All right. Are the People
16 ready today?
17 MS. DEE; Your Honor, the People are ready for
18 hearings today. Unfortunately, one of the neces$ary
19 officers is out sick. I am handing up to the court and
20 counsel a case of People V Womack. One of the necessary
21 bfficers, the IDTU officer, is out pn sick leave. He has
22 a very bad stomach 'flu. Suffice it to say he would not

23 be able to sit at the stand for very long. So, according
24 to People V Womack, it is People's position that he is a
25 material witness as he would be necessary for the DWl
2
333
PROCEEDINGS
(~ 1 trial, being that he is the IDTU officer. He is
2 unavailable because he is on sick leave. He will be back
3 on Monday the 30th. And we did exercise due diligence in
4 notifying him. I also contacted his lieutenant and his
5 ICO officer. As such, I believe we have -- we fulfill all
6 of the criteria for People V Womack and we should not be
7 charged. We are requesting to start hearings today as we
8 do have two of the other officers and we would be able to
9 start trial on Monday the 30th.
10 THE COURT: I'm not going to separate the
11 hearings and the trial.
12 MS. DEE: Yes, Your Honor.
C~ 13 THE COURT: It is just not our practice. And I
14 do understand that you have ~n officer out sick. You have

15 confirmed he is out sick?
16 MS. DEE: Yes, Your Honor.
17 MR. PERLMUTTER: I hope he feels better.

1B THE COURT: How is September 24?
19 MR. PERLMUTTER: One second, judge. I don't
20 think that is going to work for me, judge. I'm starting
21
22 THE COURT: October 2nd. Arid again, to be
23 clear, these dates are being chosen because they're really
24 the soonest trial dates the court is able to accommodate
25 for a non-jail case.

("
3
334
PROCEEDINGS
1 MR. PERLMUTTER: Okay. Judge, can we do the 3rd

(
2 of October?
3 THE COURT: Yes.
4 MR. PERLMUTTER: Great.
5 THE COURT: The case is adjourned to Part E on
6 October 3rd 2012. That is for hearings and trial. Parole
7 is continued.
8 MS. DEE: Your Honor, I am sorry for not
9 mentioning earlier but I did receive a motion to compel.
10 MR. PERLMUTTER: JUdge, I'm sorry. October 3rd
11 is not a good date for me. I am engaged on that dates.
12 THE COURT: Now everything is changing anyway.
13 MR. PERLMUTTER: Okay. That is fine.
14 THE COURT: Yes.
15 MR. PERLMUTTER: We filed a motion to compel,
16 jUdge. We are also' just -- we were not ready today
17 anyway. I am not going to dispute Over readiness posture
lB today, as we are still in the process of getting some
19 medical records.
20 THE COURT: Let me take a look at the motion.
21 MR. PERLMUTTER: Okay.
22 THE COURT: Do the People have a response to the
23 motion?
24 MS. DEE: Your Honor, the defense counsel filed
25 that motion on July 19th. He is requesting print outs
4
335
PROCEEDINGS
1 from the Intoxilyzer 5,000 from date of arrest February

(
2 10th, 2011 because I'm sure Your Honor now knows from
3 reading it; but all of the areas that are required
4 pursuant to CPL 240.20 subdivision (k) have been turned
5 over at arraignments; namely, the intoxilyzer print out
6 from that day. And as in our voluntary disclosure form
7 which included the calibration reports, if Your Honor
8 reads 240.20 subdivision (k), you will see that no further
9 discovery is required or necessary to be turned over. We
10 believe that we fulfilled all of our discovery
11 obligations.
12 MR. PERLMUTTER: Judge, that is a complete
13 incorrect reading of the 240.20. And the Appellate
14 Division 2nd Department has ruled that the things that are
15 listed and in 240.20 (k) are a starting point. Counsel
16 knows that calibration records are not turned over at the
17 time of arraignment. They're turned over subsequent to
18 arraignment. I'm not have you gotten calibration
19 records? We haven't had any calibration records. The
20 calibration records.
21 THE COURT: People; you have calibration?
22 MS. DEE: People have turned over calibration
23 records
24 MR. PERLMUTTER: Judge~-
25 THE COURT: One moment.
5
336
PROCEEDINGS
c 1
2
MS. DEE:
THE COURT:
-- pursuant to our voluntary --
I can't hear when everybody is
3 talking at once.
4 MR. PERLMUTTER: She said they were turned over
5 from the date of the arrest.
6 MS. DEE: No. No.
7 MR. PERLMUTTER: That is not correct?
8 MS. DEE: That is not.
9 MR. PERLMUTTER: Calibration records are not
10 from the date of the arrest?
11 THE COURT: Okay. Let me hear. Go ahead.
12 MS. DEE: Yes, Your Honor. As I stated, we can
(~
13 have the court reporter read it back; but what I said was
14 what was turned over was the Intoxilyzer reports from the
15 date of arrest, February 10,2011; and thereafter, the
16 calibration reports that are required by law under People

17 V Alvarez, in our voluntary disclosure forms which inClude
18 calibration reports within one year of the testing -- test
19 date. And actually, we have turned over more than just

20 one report. I believe we turned over two reports.
21 THE COURT: Do you happen to have a copy of the
22 calibration reports here today?
23 MS. DEE: Yes, I do, Your Honor.
24 THE COURT: You could provide counsel with a
25 copy?
6
337
PROCEEDINGS
1 MS. DEE: If the court would allow me to make a

(
2 copy, yes.
3 THE COURT: Absolutely.
4 MR. PERLMUTTER: Judge, there are a few
5 problems. First of all, the calibration reports that
6 counsel is going to turn over are going to be incomplete
7 because in a calibration testing in the New York City --
8 the New York police lab generally has a separate print out
9 for each of the calibration tests that are conducted.
10 They are RFI tests. The invalid test, the insufficient
11 sample test, the materials that we have gotten to date
12 don't include those materials. The other thing, too, is
13 we are asking because we have learned recently from
14 another OWI practitioner there is a maintenance log
15 retained for each machine by NY PD. We would like to know
16 what maintenance has been done since the time of
17 calibration. Prior to, sUbsequent to the client's breath
18 test. We think ~e are entitled to that, as well.
19 MS. DEE: Your Honor --
20 THE COURT: Go ahead.
21 MS. DEE: Yes. You~ Honor, I do firmly believe
22 that we complied ~~ over complied with People v Alvarez
23 which is the controlling case in this matter. If counsel
24 would like more information, he is free to make a foil
( 25 request to obtain the records that he is requesting which
7
338
PROCEEDINGS
1 is a common practice that is done in a DWI request by

(
2 defense counsel.
3 MR. PERLMUTTER: Judge, we make foil -- we have
4 made foil requests to NY PD. We -- they refuse to produce
5 the information.
6 MS. DEE: On this case?
7 MR. PERLMUTTER: Not on this case but on many
8 cases in the past.
9 THE COURT: I am granting the motion to the
10 limited extent that calibration reports must be provided
11 to the extent they haven't already been provided. I'm not
12 requiring that the People turn over any maintenance
(, 13 records in connection with the device in this case.
14 MR. PERLMUTTER: If the machine had maintenance
15 done to it and the machine has had problems, NY PD has
16 come down and fixed that machine, it is not reflected in
17 either calibration records and field test reports, you are

18 saying that defendants have no right to that information?
19 THE COURT: I am saying that I am denying your

20 motion.
21 MR. PERLMUTTER: You are saying that defendants

22 have no right to that information; correct?
23 THE COORT: r am denying your motion. Part E,
24 October 3rd, 2012. Unless you show me there was a problem
c. 25 with the machine that day. Then r would consider -- or
8
339
PROCEEDINGS
1 the day before. Then I would consider.

(
2 MR. PERLMUTTER: If I don't have the maintenance
3 log, I can't show that, jUdge.
4 THE COURT: All right.
5 MR. PERLMUTTER: That is the problem. They are
6 hiding material.
7 THE COURT: No, I think this is a fishing
6 expedition.
9 MR. PERLMUTTER: No, it is not, jUdge. It is
10 just trying to get basic information about the machine.
11 They have that information at the NY PD. They maintain
12 it. They have produced it in other cases and it's time
13 that it stop. It's time that the courts allow us to see
14 exactly what happens with those machines. There are
15 twelve intoxilyzer's in the entire city that are
16 maintained by the police department. All we're asking you
17 to do is look at the information about how those machines
18 are being pre-maintained.
19 THE COURT: Your vehement objection is noted for
20 the record. Part E, October 3rd, for hearings and trial
21 in connection with this case. Thank you.
22 MS. DEE: Your Honor, for the record, I have
23 turned over an extra copy of the calibration records.
24 THE COURT: I'm sorry, Mr. Perlmutter. You said

I'
\ 25 October3rd is not a good date for you?
9
340
PROCEEDINGS
1 MR. PERLMUTTER: It is in my motion.

(
" 2 THE COURT: I thought you didn't get any
3 calibration reports.
4 MR. PERLMUTTER: That is also in my motion,
5 jUdge.
6 THE COURT: But I thought you told me you didn't
7 get any calibration.
8 MR. PERLMUTTER: I have. Now that I have this
9 stuff, it is still inadequate.
10 THE COURT: Do you specifically state exactly
11 what is missing from what yov have there?
12 MR. PERLMUTTER: Yes. I said that we haven't
c 13
14
gotten that other material, as well.
MS. DEE: Your Honor, if I may be heard briefly?
15 I would implore the defense counsel to do two things in
16 order to help us alleviate the situation. Number one,
17 file a foil request. Number two, I don't believe in his
18 -- in this motion correct me if I'm wrong -- that those
19 listings that you just spelled are spelled out in your
20 motion.
21 MR. PERLMUTTER: I believe they are, judge.
22 THE COORT: r don't knowhow they could when you

23 just told me you didn't get it. In addition, I want to
24 know what specifically is deficient about what was
25 provided by the People.
11
341
PROCEEDINGS
1 THE COURT: Have a good day.
2 MR. PERLMUTTER: I'm not done yet.
4 * * '* * "* * *
5 Certified to be a true and correct transcript.
6
october 22, 2012
7
10
11
12
( 13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
13
342
EXHIBIT S - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

Examples from the Alcohol Testing Program,
Florida Department of
Law Enforcement Website
(pp. 342-346)
343
.11/19/12 WSP Breath Test rrogram - Web Based Discovery Matenals
Mondav, November 19, 2012
Washington State Patrol
Breath Test Program' Discovery Materials Site
Welcome to the Web Based Discovery Materials Site (WebDMS). This site provides Instant access
to records of breath test rasurts, instrument maintenance, policies, procedures and manuals of the
Washington Slate Patrol Breath Test SecUon.
Search Options - To begin your search, select one of the following options:
I SNtdi)~ - Breath Tesllo&!tumenls

I se.ifh;~~ - QAP Simulator C:ertlficatlooQ
I SNId,~Jj - Solution BatcbCtrliiODtiOlls
NOTE: Breath T81>t InslJ\lment records l/1at are available on this Wflb aite extend back approXbnalely ,three
years. Some of tho records ,found (I.e.. case 1jIes) may extend back even further. Older records not found
on this site must be obtalrMJd rrom l/1e local responsible Technician. This 'Neb sit!! doe:s nol contan coples of
permit cards for Individual operators, which must be obtaIned from the Individual law enforcement agen¢y
with which the operator Is employed.
February 2, 2012 - The WashIngton Slate Patrol Will be ltansitionlng,to a new \:Veb
Based Discovery Malerials Sila (WebDMS). This lransltlon is currently scheduled for
Wednesday, February 8th, beginning at noon Pacific Standard Time. Users may
experience disruptions In servioe b-elween noon and 3:00 pm on that date and It could
take up to 24-hours before all redlrectHo the new site are established.
VIitIat this means for you: The new WebDMS has been lncorporated:lnto the main WSP
web slle. This will provide easier access to other WSP online services and:lnfoO'Tl~t1on!
Numerous enhancemenls B'nd upgrades were also made to WebDMS' to make It easier
to nnd and downlolid the information from ihe site.
Please Nole: Users will sun be able toacces8 the WebDMS site from
hUp;IJbooalhlesl.wsp.wa.goyl as well as hllD:!/brealhtestwso.wa,g\2vNVelcome:hbn.
However, the hltp:llbrealhtesl.w:rp,wa govJQefault.asD address will no longer work.
For questions, please contact the Breath Test Program at BreatbteSt@WSp.wa.Qoy.
December 29. 2010 - A change has been made,to the December 13th notice re9~rdlng
uncertainly tables to clarify that the values deserlbed ,have been computed using the
mean of the!Wo breath lesl results. Please see the December; 3th, 2010 notice for
more Information.
For previous notiCes or updates, please see our WebDMS Notices Archiye page.
If you have further questions or do not find tbl' records you are seeking, please contact
the Breath Test Program: (S08 be/ow). 1
Breath Test Program· Contact Infonnatlon
If you have further questions or do not lind the reco~s you are seeking. please contact the
344
J.lf19/12 WebDMS QAP Slmlllator seardl (Washington State Patrol)
Bre-atb Test Program . WebDMS QAP Simulator Se-arch
QAP Simulator Search

[ l
• RequIred Field ( Search ) ( ReseJ )
345
11/19/12 WebDMS Breattr (est seard1 (Was hIllyton .state l'iI~rol)
Breath Te~t Program . WebDMS Breath Test Search

t YlglU)MSHOmq 1
Breath Te$ Search
L I
[-=:1
I I
• Required Reid ( ~a.rch )( RU"et )
346
11/19/12 WSP Breath Test t"r.ogr.li1i - WebB3sed'Dlstovery Malena/s

Breath Test Program at IimalbIA~W:ip ,«"gov or cal.l1h~ Breath TeBt Program In your local
area:
• BUrlington (360) 757-7553

• KenitewiQ( (509) 734-7029
• Marysville (360) 654.-1127
• Poulsbo (360) n9-8352 ext'85122
• Seattle (206) 720~3018
• Spokane (509) 221~615
• TiI.co~ (2533 538"~~.43
• Tumwater (360) 586"; 516
• Union Gap (509) 24.'9-611:6
• Vancouver'(360) 44G-l~16
• Wenatcha.9 (500) 682-8118
P1ealle note tbl!t &ome.Q.f tbe documoo~ pr~lIldei1 oMtlo'YVebDMS ·.~:8re:8vafable:,",~PoF 'ffiJI
fOllll8t onlY end:wftI'P!Qu-&'e ttll!~~R"~(tI:~dllr to VIeW:~ p'~I~:1!'OmYQIlf::Web : ;~
broWser, ..
347
EXHIBIT T - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

Letter, Dated August 30, 2012,
Access Officer NYC Police Department,
with Supporting Documents
(pp. 347-370)
348
LAW OFFICES
of
ADAM D. PSIlLMVTTaII., ESQ. 0, CoUNSEL

•
]INHJnIlI R. LoUIS-]BUNB, ESQ.
PAUL GJ.BBN'llJLD, ESQ•
DANIIL A. M'GUINNJ!SS, ESQ.
August 30, 2012
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL
Records Access Officer

NYC Police Department
F.O.I.L. Unit - Legal Bureau
One Police Plaza, Room 110-C
New York, NY 10038
Dear Sir or Madam:
I am writing to request records pursuant to N.Y. Public Officers Law §§ 87 and

89, also known as the FreedomofInfonnation Law (FOIL). I am a criminaJdefense
attorney in the New York City'area and have come to be aware of the records requested
herein through my practice. I request these records for both infonnational and
professional reasons.
I request copies ofall calibration and maintenance records for all Intox.ilyzer
5000EN machines owned or maintained by the NVPD for the last five yeaci(beginning
January 2008 WItil the present). Through my practice 1have learned that the city
conducts regular maintenance on theseniachines and that the following documents are
produced during the course of that maintenance:
• A Record of Intoxilyzer 5000 Calibration (example attached hereto as Exhibit A);

• A printout of the machine's calibration tests which include printouts ofthe
following:
o a diagnostic check (example attached hereto as Exhibit B);
o an air blank calibration check (example attached hereto as Exhibit C);
o an insufficient sample check (example attached hereto as Exhibit D);
o an inhibited RFI check (example attached hereto as pxhibit E);
o an invalid sample check (eKamp]e attached hereto as Exhibit F); .
o an interferent check (eKarnple attached hereto as Exhibit G); and
o an invalid test check (example attached hereto as Exhibit H); .
• a hand written maintenance log (eKamples attached hereto as Exhibit I)
260 MADISON AVENUE, SUITE 1800 • NEW YORE::, NY 10016

t: (112) 619 - 1990 • f: (2.u) 679 - 1995 • WWfV.adpltgal.com
349
NYPD FOIL Request
August 30, 2012
Page 20f3
Additionally, I request any other records, reports, logs, printouts, service notes or
any other materials that may be generated as a result of maintenance, inspection, repair,
or calibration.
It is my understanding that Intoxilyzer 5000EN machines are maintained at the

following precincts around the city:
• 7th Precinct
19 Y3 Pitt St.
New York, NY
• 28th Precinct
2271-89 8th Ave
New York, NY
• 45th Precinct,
2877 Barkley Avenue
Bronx, NY
• 78th Precinct
65 6th Avenue
Brooklyn, NY
• 112th Precinct
68-40 Austin Street
Forest Hills, NY
• 120th Precinct
78 Richmond Terrace
St. George, NY
Through my practice I have learned that the city does currently or at one point did
maintain Intoxilyzer SOOOEN machines with the serial numbers below. Please note that
my request is not limited to these serial munbers. Instead, documents corresponding to
these machines are necessary, but are not sufficient to completing this request.
• 68-010779 • 68-010779 • 68-011196 • 68-011473

• 68-010780 • 68-010780 • 68-011197 • 68-011474
• 68-010782 • 68-010782 • 68-011198 • 68-012478
• 68-011086 • 68-011086 • 68-011467 • 68-012584
• 68-011090 • 68-011090 • 68-011472 • 68-013141
I understand there is a fee of $.25 per page for duplication of the records
requested. If the fee is expected to exceed $500.00, please contact me before duplicating
350
NYPD FOIL Request
August 30, 2012
Page 3 of3
the records. I ask that the records be produced electronically where possible in order to
reduce costs.
As you know, FOIL requires that an agency respond to a request within five (5)
business days of receipt ofa request. I would appreciate a response at your earliest
convenience.
If for any reason any portion of my request is denied, please inform me of the
reasons for the denial in writing and provide the name and address ofthe person or body
to whom the appeal should be directed.
I thank. you in advance for your help with this matter.
Sincerely,
,
351
EXHIBIT A
352
••" ' I, " _ '-'" __ ..

..· ••t _ ......... ' ....
- - - . - - - -... - ..- . . . . . - - - - - ".. - ......... ------...~-. . . . . . .- - -_ _ - . . . 1 _ ... _ .....
. .. -_..
RECORO OF INTOXILVZE&l50CO CALIBRATION
114 r::t1:J,(~I::' UOUI. HI)
S u:.rVf:'4 n*l"~ lI.q S 'l"'~ to. I'Wf':l" ~::"..:O
1§16::..t.n\4:l6 !
, bJl,. -a9..;Joi1U,~~_' ......_ttA\...JiI,;:t()~ ....;
Breath 1'!Jb9 Hea~tr ";~~lo..:- " ._ [nvllid Sa'r.p:'~_ _...o:O"~;I!.,,'... _
:~suff\eifnt San:~l& _ _~,;r.O:o.:.i\

. . I l \ . - -_ _
RFI ' ci\--- _ Invalid Tut ~O:;.J'\<lo-'" _
P.eslt • at< p,.in~ r!!!S~ - OV), _

Dtritzl msplay ~~'--' _ J"
~en~ral Condition ~~~~~~'~~~~~~~~~~ _ _~~~~~~ ~__~~

CI..UBRAT/ON TESTS
1. 0" Q95
'2. ~b3'
..
.,),
• 09..'-
~. . !43:l
5. · rtt1
Rt~'Jrn Iru:rument r~p:'op.r 'rut ~ro:fe ~,_ _ ~.:::e:..;£;;...-. ._. :ni:iais (}iJ?;). _
Co:nm~r.u - - - - - - - - - - - - -.. --o---..----'--2fi-~T ..----...--
-------------J!:G2---------
----------_....--...--- , -----------------.._------
-_......-.-_ _-
......
- - ............__, w _ _- • _
....
~ .. ;:~:... -:...• ~..,~~~.;j

'.::, -:~:t .. :.~~ 9~'
-----'/--='"7"--- .+..-\--_....- ._.... ~.---- . ...--....--.-.--. - - -
353
EXHIBITB
354
001 PC':'
XNTQXXLY~ER - ALCOHOL ANALYZ£R
MOO!tt SOOOEN SN 68-011476
()8126/2008
nIAGNO$'!';!C ns,:,
PRON C81tC)( PA.SSED
1.80 \lEa - GU'7'. U
SX,AW '15_2240
"AM CH!iCK P~SSEl)
TEt-sP CRECR PASSEl)
PROCESSOR CHEC:X
H01'OR CHEeR PASSED
:eAPROM Ctfl!lCK PASS£D
SBRIAL NO. MATeH PASSED
UtlG'E I ST.A»ILlt'! P),SSEl'
Auto C~L S'l'~TUS .PASSE:>
R'l'C.CRECK PASSSD
:nl'rE~NAL Si.t'O PASSE:O
n:tAGNOS'T!C PASS:eD
PRtN'rER CRaCK
A8CDEFGHI~~OPQaSTUVWXYZ
Ol2:3-4561S9
355
EXHIBITC
356
007 pel'
l~OXILYZER - ALCOHOL ANA~Y:E~
KODEL SOOOEN SN 68 ...01:'476
08/26/2006
TEST 'Sl:IlC 1':&111:
AIR BLANI\ .000 17:35£01'
CAL.CBBex .095 l1:35EOT
AI~BI.ANIC .000 l7:36aD1'
CAL. CREel< .096 11:36tsDl'
AIR EXtANt< .000 17:36::1:>':1'
CAL. C~CR .O'f 11 : 3. 7'B0'!'
AIR BLAtr.{ .000 2.7: 37!lD'::
CAL. casel< .097 17:3121)1'
A:r:R &LANiC •.000 I1t37EiOT
CAt. eageR .091 1 1 s 3 8EI>'1'
AIR SUNX .000 11:38&0'1'
NO. 01' S~LE$f 05
MEll.bh . .0962
STD. D1!:VIM'tON: •.0008363
357
EXHIBITD
358
007 PC'!'
INToX%LYZER - ALCOltOL ANALYSD
"ODBL 5000EN . SN 68-011476
08/~612008
'tES'!' tBJ:'AC TIME

AIR BLANK .000 17: 392D'I'
C.AL~ CHECX .097 17:3'ED'J.'
Ala 8:t...ANJ: .000 17;40ED'1'
*SUBJBC'l' TEST .000 17J43BP'r
AIR BLANK .000 17:43EDT
.. INSUi'P:J:CXSNT· SAHPLS -. VAllUE
PRIMED. WAS .1l1G1UjS'1'OB1'AINEJ>.
359
EXHffiITE
360
J •
SN 68-011476 VERSION G1176. 1.

SLAVE 75 2240
DATE 08/2612008 TIME 3. 7 =52 EO'
:INVALID TEST
INHIBI'l'ED - R.F%
361
EXHIBITF
362
007 PCT
INTOXILY~BR- ALCOHOL ANALYZBR
MODSL 5000BN SN 68-011476
08/26/2008
US'!' '8rAe TZMJ:
AIR SLANt( .000 17 : 4.4ED'1'
CIlLo. CDC!( .096 17:44!:DT
AZR etAmc .000 17:4480T
:INVALID SAMPLE •xXX 17:45200'
Alit BuWJ( .000 17:451:0'1'
INVALID SAMPLE
363
EXHIBITG
....... ...... " ... 364
007 peT
tNTOXruYZ~ - ALCOHOL ANAtrzER
MODEL SOOOEN SN 68-011476
08/26/2008
TEST 'B~AC TIME
AIR &~N~ .000 17: 41EDT
CAL. CBBC~ .096 17:472D'I:
AXR Bt-ANK .000 17148]$0'1'
SUBJEC7 TES~ .047 17~48ED'J:'
IN1.'BRPSIU:NT SUDTRAC'1'!30
AIR BLANX .000 17:49ED'l'
365 ,
·; ..... -
SN 68-011476 VERSION G1776. 1

SLAVE 75_2240
DATE 08/26/2008 TIME 17: SlED
INVALID TEST
INTERFERENT DZTBCTEb
366
"
EXHIBITH
367
SN 68-011476
SLAVS 7S 2240 VERSION G1776.:
DATE 08/26/2008 TIME 17: 51 EI
INVALID TEST
368
EXHIDITI
369 -- .... -- ----
~1~T-oXll YzER 68-o12~84

..
'
DATE COIDIENT8
"-./'
,.,......., ,
"
.t-,I, ~-slt;,.. ;""~*At,,/.ro~~M*.rlli-e

.. ot:f.~lwYfJ>n Q;-,t '. .'
P(~. alII.! 't: 41 1»". i, 'k,!,~ 11&'
7&1,,· 4~"rr.J,n: ted ~t/
CqD!J,p:;-b: ,h,
~ P"i~ ~.~t ueff} ~

1M I,.e.t, M.... flit. !lw7 Nfil{....t .
, '?11~ 711;"[ . ,,1.4/; 4:£: {I: J~ fA Jilt-L
~~',.~ ~ e(. ~ ~ ¢t. (/101001 ,
/4 .
',-,,"
.~, -----
7/L7/O'J
'S't'Yol :
. ,
f ,
- -.........
370
. ~ -
, 'INTOXILYZER 68:-012584
,
\
DA~ COMMENlS ' .
~-JA~';~:::~Z~~:e:::t:?;~~I~~~.
ltJ /(1. .
~G C",f .•.., /
~$l;tq
a,;,(..
11._-
,·~o.e ,'£It ~ ty..: C".. f...!-I
-.
z6lt{
~..,A A. ~-{,'--(i .. t'I...t.;I·eJ.....lc.
,'-.r<t;A
.!,..,;,._:","?.! ttt
..
r'1
be .. ,
ft"c,;{c (
lir-~#Ij '2"t.,....{
t.. Jflo
~, ~. ~tJ-:L.T I' ~ 4,.,/

• ft:- , 4 Zt:l: ri".' " '
. til
I ~":S' 6~.. '7l~ - 1'~)~-1f'1~ £.s'(
~~f~ tlle(12), Ii
.~dlt
,.
I"., (..1:< JIJ·/~"'A... C ",.<"'/ 4!&o (Jf= ('lifO '/.,
.~~~ I~ .... I£f!a~'~("I ... ofpP( tlf~3 \ .'
~':1.t"", ....t_"." S'A:~'" ......-)",. ....,'oK. _&_. &,t...(, •
,~ ..-. t.~1- l~"., 1# st..... l .. ~1If..&().J fYO of.'
(;"".,(t s "If) '!',(./Vt.. I<.d,,-J, C)

\!)
i
.JJ.....~l~1" (A.,.f.'- I,,. c,.c.:.. ~ ...1 i-: r'!" (J"" 1{1tf.6
sb, t--ft" c ~ ..,,) 'it .... r... l",c

'I
lit-..ftll" 11("0
J/,.. (-1," ':)1( 'to- .,
, .
, ~- l~~ /11"'4 ,\ (·", .. (d~r PI( llc3
"
t . . rt·...·· ~ 1-"'''' (1.,-10 ,I r•.. . ,. ~ r"A {

",
371
EXHIBIT U - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

Affidavit of Service, Sworn to August 31, 2012
(pp.371-372)
372
I.I
I AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
STATE OF NEW YORK )

) 5S.:
COUNTY OF NEW YORK )
KRITlKA DUBE, being duly sworn, deposes and says:
I am not a party to the action, I am over 18 years of age, and I reside in New
York, New York.
On August 31, 2012 I served a true and correct copy of the within F.O.I.L
REQUEST LETTER upon:
Records Access Officer

NYC Police Department
F.O.LL Unit- Legal Bureau
One Police Plaza, Room 11 O-C
by depositing the same in a postpaid wrapper addressed to the above in an official depository
under the exclusive care and custody ofthe U.S. Postal Service within the State ofNew York.
~~ KIitika Dube.
Sworn to before me this

31 51 day of August 2012
A .
NotIry PUblic, State of NewYork
NO.02MC8265488
Qualified In New York COunty
Commlallon Expires duly 09, 2016
373
EXHIBIT V - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

Letter, Dated September 20, 2012, from Richard
Mantellino, to NYPD FOIL Unit
(pp. 373-375)
374
POLICE DEPARTMENl
LEGAL BUREAU
F.OlL Unit, Room 110C
One Police Plaza
New York, NY 10038
Law Offices of Adam D. Perlmutter 9/20/2012

Daniel McGuiness, Esq.
260 Madison Avenue ste 1800
New York NY 10016
File N 2012-PL5804
Your File #
Dear Sir or Madam
This is in response to your letter dated 8/30/2012 in which you requested access to certain
records under the New York State Freedom of Infonnation Law (FOIL).
In regard to the document(s) which you ~quested, I must deny access to these records on the
basis of Public Officers Law section 87(2)(e)m as such records / infonnation, if disclosed would
interfere with law enforcement investigations or judicial proceedings.
Should you so desire, you may appeal this decision or any POniOD of thereof. Such an appeal must
be made in writing, within thiny (30) days of Utisletter. and must be fonvarded to:
Jonathan David
Records Access Appeals Officer
New York City PoliCe I>eparnneDt
One Police plaza·Room 1406
New York, NY 10038-1497
COURTESY • PROFESSIONAUSM • RESPECf

POLICE DEPARTMENT c}~~~
:Jlle '~
OY! ~~'"
LEG~UREAU
F.OlL. UNIT----.ll.OOM IIOC
ONE POllCE PLAZA
(/)
o
:5
o
~ G~·"i~i/iIl!iff...JiJIifI-
~~ z: ~.~
':::' -
- . .·
...1.... ...:_$
NEW YORK., N.Y. 10038 I- 02 1M $ 00.45°

wJiYOrku
III : 000800413.3
a:
ii: '; MAlLED FROM ZJPCODE 10038
LBF# 2012-PL-5804
Law Offices of Adam D~ Perhnutter t.H

.......:J
Daniel McGuiness, Esq. U"I
260 Madison Avenue ste 1800
New York NY 10016
FOR POLICE EMERGENCY ONLY
DIAL 911
1CCiE,240igg 1,..lIIt.un...... t) .1l,tI.1.1.1..IU.. u .. III. 1,,1.1••1...11
... :Ilot""'(1.J"'"t
376
EXHIBIT W - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

Letter, Dated September 25, 2012,
to Jonathan David
(pp. 376-378)
377
LAw OFFICES OF ADAM D. PERLMUTTER, P.C.

ArrORN~YSAT LAW
260 MADISON AVENUE, SUITE' 800

NEW YORK, NY '00t6
TEL. (2 t 2) 6790' 990
FAX. (2 t 2) 679-'995
ADAM D. Pul.HUTT1£Il, ESQ. O,COUNSID.
PAUL GREENFIItLD. ESQ.
DANnn. A. McGUINN.... EsQ. JEMMII"Dl LoUJ9.JEUNIE, EsQ.
September 25,2012
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL
Jonathan David
New York City Police Department
One Police Plaza, Room 1406
New York, NY 10038..1497
Dear Mr. David:
I am writing to appeal the denial afmy FOIL request, file # 2012-PL-S804,dated

September 20, 2012. Myrequest is f9r a copy of all records relating to the calibration
and maintenance of the NYPD's IntoxilyZerSOOOEN machines. A copy afmy initial
request is annexed hereto.
The letter denying my request is based upon Public Officers Law § 87(2)(e)(i),
which allows for an agency to withhold documents if such records or informationwiJI
interfere with law enforcementinvestigationsorjudicial proceedings. This terse denial
lacks the required "particularized and sPecific justification;' for not disclosing requested
docwnents. See Gould v. NeW York City Police Dep't, 89 N.Y.2d 267; 277 (1996). As
you are no doubt aw¥e. the Court of Appeals recently Clarified in Lesher v. Hynes, 19
N.Y.3d 57, 67 (2012):
A criminal prosecution is a particular kind of enforcementproceeding where

disclosure of particular kinds of Investigatory records while a case is pending
would generally Interfere with enforcement proceedings. We emphasize that
this does not mean that every document in a law enforcement agency's
criminal case file is automat/cally exemptfrom disclosure simply because kept
there. The agency must identify the generic kinds of doeuments for which the
exemption ls darned, and the generic risks posed by disclosure of these
categories of documents.
378
NYPD FOIL Appeal
September 25, 2012
Page 2 of2
(emphasis added) (citations omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted). Please identify
what, if any, risks are posed by the disclosure of these documents.
I am requesting only the general documents relating to the machines' calibration

and testing, and not results for the testing ofanyone individual. As such, there are no
privacy concerns, and no need for redactions. Furthermore, numerous NYPD technicians
have testified that these documents are collected in the routine course ofbusiness.
I thank you in advance for your help with this matter.
Sincerely,
Daniel A. McGuinness, Esq.

379
EXHIBIT X - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

USPS Return Receipt Card And Website Tracking Infonnation
(pp.379-381)
380
SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECT/ON •
~
• Complete Items 1. 2. and 3. Also complete
Item 4 If Restricted Delivery Is desired.
• Print your name and address on the reverse o Addressee
so that we can return the card to you. c. Date of Delivery
• Attach this card to the back of the mailplece.
or on the front If space permits. t-b~t-'7'I-&.,j'-'-'-'=-'<'-I-+--_--a._-.,.-----1'
-----------------1 . Isellvery address dl t from Item 11 Cl Yes f,
1. Article Addressed to: If YES, enter dellvery address below: 0 No r
. " , , ' Jonathan David
Records ,Access Appeals Officer
New York City Pol~ce Department
On'e'P61ice'Plaia;'Roo'm 1406· . 3. ~~Jce Type
. ', New Y ork~ N'Y ~ 003..~. :.. " )2r.CertjfIed Mall 0 Express Mall
• • • '. J o RegIstered 0 Retum Receipt for Merchandise
o 'OS~d Mall 0 C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes
381
1/16/13 USPS.com® - Track & Confirm
English Customer Service USPS Mobil. Raglster' Sign In
~USPS.COM· Search USPS com or Tracl< Packages
Quick T~I$ Ship a i'aol<aga Sef.d Mail Menage Your Mal: She;:
Track & Confirm
YOUR LABEL NUMBER SERVICE STATUI OF YOUR ITEM DATE & liME LOCAllON FEATURES
Oelivered September 27, 2012, 7:59 am NEW YORK, NY 10038 Cer1iIied MaU'"
Notice left (No Seplember 25, 2012, 1:19 pm NEWYORK, NY 10038

Authorized Recipient
Available)
Arrival at Unil September 26, 2012,1:14 pm NEW YORK, NY 10038
Oepart USPS Sort Septamber 28, 2012 NEW YORK, NY 10199

Feciity
Processed tIlrough September 26, 2012, 5:04 am NEW YORK, NY 10199
USPS Sort Faclhy
Check on Another Item

'Mlat's your label (or receipt) number?
LEGAL ON USPS.COM ON ABOUT.USPS.COM OTHER USPS SITES

Privacy Policy' Government Services) About USPS Home, Business Customer Gateway'
Terms 01 USB) fluy Stamps & Shop , N8'NR{OOnl J Poslallnspeclors ,
FOIA, Print a Label with Postage, Mall Service Update. I InsP6Clor General,
No FEAR Act EEO Data , Customer Service) Forms & Publica/ions I Poslal Explorer}
Sile Index} Careers i
https:/ Itools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAclion .action . III

382
EXHIBIT Y - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

Letter, Dated December 3, 2012, from
Jonathan David to Daniel A. McGuinness
(pp. 382-383)
383
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Office of Deputy Commissioner,
Legal Matters
One Police Plaza, /Room 1406A
New York, New Yor{c.l0038
December 3,2012
Daniel McGuinness, Esq.

Law Offices of Adam Perlmutter
260 Madison Avenue. Suite 1800
RE: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION LAW

REQUEST: LBF # 12PLI05804
Dear Mr. McGuinness:
This is in response to your letter dated September 25, 2012, appealing th~ determination
of the Records Access Officer (RAO), dated September 20,2012, regarding records requested
from the New York City Police Department pursuant to the Freedom ofInformation (FOIL) by
letter dated August 30, 2012.
The appeal is denied pursuant to Public Officers Law (POL) Section 87(2)(e)(i) and (ii)
because disclosure of the requested records to just one party would interfere with the ordinary
course of court-supervised discovery and deprive other parties of their right to a fair trial or
impartial adjudication in ongoing litigation. The appeal is further denied pursuant to POL
Section 87(2)(e)(i) because disclosure would interfere with ongoing law enforcement
investigations. Also, the requested records are exempt from disclosure pursuant to POL Section
87(2)(e)(iv) because disclosure would reveal non-routine criminal investigative techniques or
procedures. Furthelmore, some of the reu>rds requested are also denied as intra-agency records
nder POL Section 87(2)(g) to the extent that said records contain preliminary data and
information.
Other exemptions under FOIL also may apply.
You may seek judicial review of this determination by commencing an Article 78

proceeding within four months of the date of this decision.
Sincerely,
"<:-II,,, ;;
11
p/,'
~~D~
c: Committee on Open Government

384
EXHIBIT Z - ANNEXED TO VERIFIED PETITION

Letter, Dated October 15,1980,
from Robert J. Freeman to Susan Marie Tatro
(pp. 384-388)
385
STATE OF NEW YORK
W COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC ACCESS TO RECORDS
l="oIL- (fe) - 173.3
,.lJ!ilJ~ • d ;....~...,"'O'e*. _ l l I l I d . '• • 'e: .",'alClilll• • &'JCO"""C="'EJ:'QI
DEPARTMENT OF STATE 162 WASHINGTON AVENUE. ALBANY. NEW YORK '2231

r I t ' l L .1:Ac:l
;t:I _ •
("
,,,_,-/TlE MEMBERS
• (57B) 4J4·2578,21"
THOMAS H. COLLINS
MARIO M. CUOMO
WAL:TER W. GRUNFELD
MAACELLAMAXWELL
HOWARD F.MILLER
JAMES C. O'SHEA
BASIL A. "AlER~ON
'I'VING ,. SEIDMAN
GIUIERT P. SMITH. C~lrma"
DOUGLAS L. TURNER
CECUTIVE DIR1CTOR ~tober 15, 1980
,.OBERT J. FREEMAN
Ms. SUsan Marie Tatro.

Town Attorney
Town of OJlonie
Marorial TCMl'l Hall
Newtonville, NY 12128
Dear Ms. Tatro:
Thank you for sen:ling a copy of the detennination ren:lered on

appeal under the Free:1an of Information law regarcli;ng a request by
Hubert D. Miles, Esq.
The dete.rrn:i.ration is reflective of a denial of access to re-

cOlns that i.rrli.cate the results of a chemical test to debmnine the
blood alcohol content of a particular individual' charged with driving
while intoxicated. It is ootOO.~ too, ~t Mr. Miles represents an
insurance ccxnpany that has been sued by the subject of the chemical
te,st, presumably an insured, for breach of contract.
You wrote that the records in question are oot found within the
records in possession of the Town Justice and, therefore, are n:>t sub-
ject to rights of access granted by the UnifoDn Justice Court J\Ct,
SS2019 and 20l9-a. You also wrote that the Freedan of Infomation law
specifically excludes the courts am Court recerds fran its scope.
The conclusion of your letter suggested that Mr. Miles sOOuld subpoena
the recoms fran the police departItlmt whose officers administered the
test.
In all honesty, I do not un::1erstand the reaS0ning behirx1 your

determination. On the one hand, you have indicated that the records
are not in possession of a court- and, therefore, are not subject to
the provisions of the Unifonn Justice OJurt Act. On the other baril,
~ver, you intirrated that the records are in possession of a police
depart:lrent. If that is the case, the records could oot be considered
"court records" outside the scx:>pe of the Freedan of Infonration law,
but rather "agency records" subject to the Freedan of Info:roation Law
in all respects. Stated differently, a police departIrent of a town is
an "agency" as defined by saG(3) of the law. Further, in my view, re-
( sort to a subp:>ena should be unnecessary for the records in question
" are in my opinion available.
386
Ms. Susan Marie Tatro

october 15, 1980
( Page -2-
As you are aware, the Free:km of Infon:ration Law is based upon

a presunption of access. All rec::ords of an agency are available, ex--
cept those r~rds or p.:>rtions thereof, that fall within one or IID:re
grounds for denial enuroorated in S8? (2) Ca) through (h). Although there
are three grounds for denial that might be applicable with respect to
the records in question, I do not believe that aI¥ of the three could
justifiably be asserted to withhold'the test results.
The first grouni for denial that might be applicable is §87 (2)
0:», which states that an agency nay withh::>ld reoords when disclosure
\«>u1d result in tl an unwa.rranted invasion, of personal privacy". UWer
the circumstarx::es, it is Iny' contention that disclosure \'tOuld result in
a pennissible rather than an unwarranted. invasion of personal privacy.
It is clear that the applicant for the records is aware of the identity
of the person to whom the records relate, for there is a oontractual
relationship between the subject of the records ani an insurance c::arpany,
which is represented by the applicant. The charges against the subject
of the recoms could have been known to any nanber of the public, and
presumably any nanber of the pub1.ic could have been present during any
judicial proceedings related to the charge that may have been eomucted.
In addition, it appears that a ''medical authorization" 'tas signed by the
(: subject of the records. Unless I have misunderstood the correspondence
arrl the nature of the medical aut:mrization, I believe that the author-
bation is int:errled to constitute a waiver of any "rights" of privacy
with. respect to recOl:ds sought by the insurance oompany. Mxeover, as
indicated in the letter fran Mr. Hamlin to you, it has been held that
any claims of invasion of privacy are essentially waived when the subject
of the records places his physica£L condition into controversy in a suit.
In view of the foregoing, it does rot appear that §87 (2) (b) could be
asserted to withhold the test results.
. A second grourrl for denial that may be applicable is §87 (2) (g),
Which provides that an agency may withhold recoms that:
II are inter-agency or intra-agency materials

Mlich are oot: '
i. statistical or factual tabulations or

data;
ii. instructions to staff that affect the

public; or
iii. final agency {X)licy or detenni.nations ••• 11

387
Ms. SUsan Marie Tatro

October 15, 1980
( Page -3-
It is j,mp)rtant to oot.e that the quoted provision contains what in effect

is a double negative. While inter-agency and intra-agency materials nay
be withheld, portions of sooh materials oonsisting of statistical or
factual data, instructions to staff that affect the public, or finalagen-
cy policy or deterJn:inations must be made available.
In this instance, I believe that the recunls reflective of the
chemical test results oould be oonsidered llintra-agercy" naterials. :£i::Iw'-'
ever, the test results \oo'OUld constitute " statistiCal or factual tabulations
or data" that mst be rrade available. CbnSequently, I do oot believe
that §87 (2) (g) could be cited as a basis for withholding.
The last ground for denial that might be applicable is §87 (2) (e) ,
which states that an agency may withhold records or portions thereof that:
"are CCllpiled for law enforcenent purposes and

which, if disclosed, would:
i. interfere with law enforcemant investiga-

tions or judicial proceedings;
iie deprive a person of a right to a fair

trial or .imparti.al adjudication;
iii. identify a confidential oource or dis...

close confidential iitEonnation relating to
a criminal invest:igation; or
iv. reveal criminal investigative teclmlques
or procedures, except routine techniques arx1
procedures. "
Since the investigation and judicial proceedings have been tenn:inated, rone
of the first three bases for withholding listed in §B1~) Cel are in my view
applicable. Further, the last basis for withholding in Sa7 (2) (e) in my view
indicates an intent on the part of the Iegislatu:re to make the clenical tests
that have been requested. accessible. 'lb reiterate the language of that pr0-
vision, §87 (2) (e) (iv) states that records canpiled for law enforcerrent pur-
FOses may be withheld when disclosure \\Ould reveal "criminal investigative
techniques or procEilures, excel1; routine teehni~s and proc;:e;;tures" (err-
phasis added). The blocil afcohol or i1breat11alyzer1i test, as J.t is comronly
k:ncMn, is clearly a routine criminal investigative technique or prccedure.
As such, I do oot feel that §87~) (e) could be cited to withhold the records
in question.
In sum, if the records sought are in FCssession of a police depart-

ment, they are records of an "agency" subject to the Freedom of Infonna-
tion Law in all respects. Further, I do not believe that any of the grounds
( for denial could appropriately be asserted to wi thtold the records sought.
388
Ms. Susan Marie Tatro

october 15, 1980
Page -4-
I hope that I have been of sane assistance. Should any :further

questions arise, please feel free to oontact me.
S~y,
~5&.--
lbbert J. :Eresnan
Executive Director
RJF:jm
ex:: Hubert.D. Miles, Esq.
.,:
389
AMENDED VERIFIED ANSWER, SWORN TO MAY 2, 2013

(pp.389-410)
390
SUPREME COURT OF THE 8TATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORK
-----------.... _-_ .. _--------.------------------------------_._._-_._._){
THE LAW OFFICES OF ADAM D. PERLMUTfER, P.C.
Petitioner,
Index No. 100220113
For a judgment pursuant to Article 78, etc, lAS Part 36
(Ling-Cohan, J.)
-against-
NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and AMENDED

RAYMOND KELLY, in his official capacity as VERIFIED ANSWER
Commissioner of the New York City Police
Department
Respondents.
---_ __ .. _. __ .. --.. _---_._ -._._-_ _. __ .--_.--------_._--_ .. )(
Respondents, by their attorney, Douglass B. Maynard, Deputy Commissioner, Legal
Matters, New York City Police Department ("NYPD"), acting by designation of Michael A.
Cardozo, Corporation Counsel ofthe City of New York, as and for their Verified Answer to the
petition herein, respectfully allege as follows:
1. Deny the allegations set forth in paragraph" I" of the petition, except admit that
Petitioner purports to proceed as set forth therein.
2. Deny the allegations set forth in paragraph "2" of the petition, except admit that
petitioner purports to proceed as set forth therein.
3. Deny the allegations set forth in paragraph "3" of the petition.
4. Admit the allegations set forth in paragraph "4" of the petition.
5. Deny knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations set
forth in paragraph "5" of the petition.
6. Deny knowledge or information sut1icient to form a belief as to the allegations set

391
Raymond W. Kelly is the Commissioner of the NYPD.
9. Deny knowledge or information sufficient to fonn a belief as to the allegations set
forth in paragraph "9" of the petition,
10. Neither admit nor deny the allegations set forth in paragraph "10" of the petition,
which sets forth argument and conclusions of law to which rio response is required, but to the
extent this Court deems a response necessary. deny any allegations set forth therein, except admit
that breathalyzers are reliable methods of determining a subject's blood alcohol.
11. Neither admit nor deny the allegations set forth in paragraph" I I" of the petition,
which sets forth argument and conclusions ofJaw to which no response is required, but to the
extent this Court deems a response necessary, deny any allegations set forth therein, and
respectfully refer the Court to Vehicle Traffic Law §§ 1192 and 1195, respectively, for a full
statement of their content.
12. Deny knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations set
13. Deny knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the tnlth of the
allegations set forth in paragraph" 13" of the petition concerning the plea policies of the District
Attorneys' offices. Neither admit nor deny Petitioner's allegations in the first and second
sentences which set forth argument and conclusions of law to which no response is required but
to the extent necessary, deny the allegations set forth therein and respectfully refer the court to
Vchicle & 'fraffic Law § 1194 for a statement of the penalties.

392
14. Deny the allegations set forth in paragraph "14" of the petition except admit that
the NYI'D utilizes the Intoxilyzer 5000EN to conduct chemical breath-alcohol testing.
16. Deny the allegations set forth in paragraph" 16" of the petition, except admit that
the NYI'D keeps its lntoxilyzer 5000 machines at the identified precincts and at the NYI'D
Police Laboratory.
which recites infonnation contained in materials provided to which no response is required, but
to the extent this Court deems a response necessary. deny the allegations set forth therein and
respectf\llIy refer the court to the materials for a full statement ofthcir content.
19. Neither admit nor deny the allegations set forth in paragraph" 19" ofthe petition,
which recites information contained in materials provided to which no response is required, but
to the extent this Court deems a response necessary, deny the allegations set forth therein and
respectfully refer the court to the materials for a full statement of their content.
to the extent this Court decms a response necessary, deny the allegations set forth therein and
21. Deny the allegations set forth in paragraph "21" of the petition and respectfully
refer the Court to Petitioner's letter, dated August 30, 2012, annexed hereto as Exhibit "A," for a
fu II statement of its content.
22. Neither admit nor deny the allegations set forth in paragraph "22" of the petition
393
which recitcs information contained in materials provided to which no response is required. but
respectfully refcr the court to the materials for a full statement of their content.
23. Ncither admit nor deny the allegations set forth in paragraph "23" of the petition.
which recites information contained in materials providcd to which no response is required, but
respectfully refer the court to the materials for a full slatement of their content.
24. Neither admit nor deny the allegations set forth in paragraph "24" of Ihe petition,
which recites information contained in materials provided to which no response is required. but
rcspectfully refer the court to the materials for a tull statement of their contenl
refer the court to the materials [or a full statement of their content.
30. Neither admit nor deny the allegations set forth in paragraph "30" of thc petition,
394
which recites infonnatiol1 contained in materials provided to which 110 response is required. but
32. Admit the allegations set forth in the first sentence of paragraph "32" of the
petition. Deny the allegations set forth in the second sentence of paragraph "32" except admit
that the machine analyzes the vapor from the simulator solution and that the readings of the
calibration checks generate a printout.
33. Deny the allegations set forth in paragraph "33" of the petition, except admit
that the diagnostic check generates a printout.
that the Radio Frequency Interference C"RFI") check generates a printout.
35. Deny the allegations set forth in paragraph "35 of the petition, except admit that
the Interferent check generates a printout.
respectfully refer the court to the materials for a full statement ofthcir content
that the Invalid Test check generates a printout
395
respectfully refe,' the court to the testimony cited therein for a full statement of their content.
39. Deny knowledge Rnd information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
allegations set fOl1h in paragraph "39" ofthe Petition regarding what Petitioner has learned,
except admit that the NYPD maintains a maintenance log for each Intoxilyzer 5000EN used by
the NYPD,
40. Neither admit nor deny the allegations set fOlth in paragraph "40" of the petition,
except admit that access to these records sought during a criminal trial is detennined by the judge
overseeing the matter and is routinely denied,
41. Deny knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations
set forth in paragraph "41" of the petition.
42, Deny knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations
set forth in paragraph "42" of the petition.
set forth in paragraph "43" of the petition as to Petitioner's awareness.
Respondents received a request pursuant to the Freedom oflnfonnation Law ("FOIL") dated
August 30, 2012, and respectfully refer the Court to Petitioner's letter, dated August 30, 2012,
annexed hereto as Exhibit "A"," for a full statement of its content.
refer the Court to Petitioner's letter, dated August 30, 20 I2, for a full statement of its content.
set forth in paragraph "46" ofthe petition.

396
refer the Cnurt to the letter by the NYPD Records Access Officer, Lieutenant Richard
Mantellino, dated September 20, 2012, annexed hereto as Exhibit "B," for a full statement of its
content.
refer the Court to the Petitioner's appeal, dated September 25, 2012, annexed hereto as Exhibit
"C," for a full statement of its content.
49. Deny knowledge and information sufficient to fonn a belief as to the allegations
set forth in paragraph "49" of the petition, except affirmatively state that the Records Access
Appeals Officer received the appeal on October 2, 2012.
refer the Court to the letter by the NYPD's Records Access Appeals Oflicer, Jonathan David,
dated December 3, 2012, annexed hereto as Exhibit "D," for a full statement of its content.
Petitioner's rOIL request was denied.
52. Admit the ullegutions set forth in paragraph "52" of the petition.
54. Deny the alJegutions set forth in paragraph "54" of the petition.
55. Deny the allegations set forth in paragraph "55" of the petition, except
affirmatively state that the Petitioner's FOIL request was denied.
as it sets forth arguments and conclusions ofJaw, but to the extent the Court deems a response
neeessury, deny the allegations set forth therein.

397
57, Neither admit nor deny the allegations set forth in paragraph "57" of the petition
as it sets forth arguments and conclusions of law, but to the extent the Court deems a response
neecssary, deny the allegations set forth therein,
as it sets forth arguments and conclusions of law, but to the extent the Court deems a response
necessary, deny the aJlegations set forth therein,
as it sets fonh arguments and conclusions of law, but to the extent the Court deems a response
necessary, deny the allegations set forth therein.
60, Neither admit nor deny the allegations set torth in paragraph "60" of the petition
as it sets forth arguments and conclusions oflaw, but to the extent the Court deems a response
necessary, deny the allegations set forth therein,
61, Neither admit nor deny the allegations set forth in the "WHEREFORE" paragraph
inasmuch as it is a demand for relief to which no response is required.
INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT
62, In this procecding, Petitioner seeks an order directing Respondents to provide
copies of records that pertain to the cali bration and maintenance of all lntoxilyzer 5000EN
machines owned or maintained by the NYPD from January 2008 until August 2012, However,
the records sought by Petitioner are exempt from FOIL disclosure pursuant to N,Y, Public
Officers Law §87(2)(e)(i), in that the disclosure of law enforcement records would interfcrc with
pendingjudicial proceedings, Specifically, the disclosure of the requested documcnts would
interfere with pending DWI prosecutions in all five boroughs in which a defcndant is chargcd
398
with Driving While Intoxicated ('DWI") or Driving While Under the Influence of Alcohol
("DUI"), by expanding the scope of discovery permitted under Criminal Procedure Law
§240.20( I)(k) and usurping the authority of criminal court judges to determine the scope of
discovery in cases pending and to be brought before them.
63. According to CPL §240.20(1 )(k), the People must provide the criminal defendant
charged with OWI/DUI the most recent record of inspection or calibration or repair and the
certification. In the case at hand, the Petitioner, a criminal defense firm that specializes in
OWl/OUI cases, is seeking to use thc Freedom of Information Law to circumvent the established
limitation of the New York State criminal discovery statute and take from criminal court judges
the ability to exercise their discretion regarding pre-trial matters in their cases,
64, In the following pages and in the accompanying Memorandum of Law,
Respondent provides the Court with a pal1icularized showing that demonstrates that the
information withheld from diselosurc is indeed exempt from disclosure pursuant to the Freedom
of Information Law.
"'OJ{ A STATKMlcNT 01' PERTINENT ANn MAn:RJAL FACTS,

RESPONDENTS RESPECTFULLY ALLEGES:
PETITIONER'S FOIL REOUEST
65. By letter dated August 30,2012, Petitioner made a request pursuant
to FOIL seeking copies of several categories of records pertaining to the maintenance and
calibration of flll Intoxilyzer SOOOEN machines owned or maintained by the NYPD for the last
five years (January 2008 until August 2012), including but not limited to:
a) a record oflntoxilyzer 5000 calibration;
b) a printout of the machine's calibration tests, including printouts of the

399
diagnostic chcck, air blank calibration chcck, insufticicnt sample chcck, radio frequency
interference check, invalid sample check, interferent check and an invalid test chcck; and
c) handwritten maintenance log.
See Ictter dated August 30, 2012, by Daniel A. McGuinness, Esq, a copy of which is annexed
hereto as Exhibit "A."
66. By leiter duted September 20,2012, the NYPD's Records
Access Ofticer ("RAO") denied the records on the basis of N.Y. Public Ofticers Law
§87(2)(e)(i) as such records, if disclosed, would interfere with law enforcement investigations or
judicial proceedings. Thc Records Access Officer also informed Petitioner that he may appeal
this decision within thirty (30) days of this letter. See letter dated September 20, 2012, by
Lieutenant Richard Mantellino, a copy of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit "B."
67. By leiter dated September 25, 2012, the Petitioner appealed the
determination of the Records Access Offtcer. ~!<.!<. leIter dated September 25, 2012, by Daniel A.
McGuinness, Esq., a copy of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit "C."
68. By letter dated December 3,2012, the NYPD's Records Access Appeals
Officer("RAAO") denied Pelitioner's appeal pursuant to Public Officers Law §§87(2)(e)(i) and
(Ii) in that disclosure of the requested rccords would intcrfere with Court-supervised discovery in
ongoing litigation, would intcrfere with ongoing law enforcement investigations and further
would deprive other parties of their right 10 a fair trial or impartial adjudieation in ongoing
litigation. The appeal was also denied under Public Omcers Law §87(2)(c)(iv) because
disclosure would reveal non-routine investigative techniques or procedures. Finally, the appeal
was also denied under Public Officers Law §87(2)(g) to the exlent that the requested records
contain preliminary dala and information. See, leiter dated December 3, 2012, by Jonathan
400
David, a copy of which is annexed hercto as Exhibit "0,"
69. On Januar y 30, 201], Petitioner commenced an Article 78 proceeding
in thc Supreme Court, New York County, seeking to compel a disclosure undcr FOIL ofrccords
Petitioner intends to use in defending criminal DWI/DUI cascs.
The Inloxilzyer SOOOEN
70. The Intoxilyzcr SODDEN has been established as a scientifically
accepted and reliable method of determining a subject's blood alcohol level by using ehemical
breath-alcohol testing.
th
71. The Intoxi lyzer machines arc kept at six precincts -- the 7 precinct, 28'h
precinct, 4S'" precinct, 78'h precinct, 112'h precinct and the 120'" precinct, There are two
Intoxilyzer machines kept at each precinct and the remaining Intoxilyzers arc kept at thc NYPD
Police Laboratory.
72. Routine checks of the Intoxilyzer machincs are made by an NYPO
technician. These checks include the field inspection test checks, which are done every fivc to
fourteen days, and thc full calibration test checks, which are done every six months.
The Field Inspection Check
73. A field inspection check consists of an intcrnal diagnostic check, a breath
tube heater check, a printer check and three calibration tests are conducted.
74. During the calibration chccks, the Intoxilyzcr runs a test on a simulator
solution of ethanol, which is used as a control. Thc solution is predetermined to register at .10
reading. Additionally, an air blank lest is run which draws in room air and purges the instrument
of any intcrfcrent. Thc reading for the air blank test must be .000. When the calibration checks
are complete, a printout will be generated, listing the results of all three calibration tests. See
401
sample of calibration check printout, attached herein as Exhibit "E."
75. An internal diagnostic check is then pcrformcd that verifies that the
internal computing components are funclioning properly. This check also includes a check of
the cell temperature of the Intoxilyzer. Thc results ofthc internal diagnostic check generate a
printout. See sample of an internal diagnostic check printout, attached herein as Exhibit "F."
76. The NYPD technician conducting the tests also fills out a handwritten form,
entitled "Police Laboratory Field Unit Inspection Report," indicating the results oflhe three
calibration tests, the internal diagnoslic check, thc breath lubc heater check and the printer check.
Further, iftllere are any commenls wilh regards 10 the lesling of the machine, the leehnician will
write thcse comments in the "Rcmarks" section. Sce sample of a Police Laboratory Field Unit
Inspection Report, attached herein as Exhibit "G."
The Full Calibration Tesl
77. A full calibration lest is conducted on each machine every six monlhs.
During Ihe full calibration lest, an NYI'D technical supervisor runs a diagnoslic check, five
calibralion ehecks and simulated tcsts checking for any polential errors with Ihe machinc's
readings.
78. The resulls of thc diagnostic check are generated on a printout. See sample
of a diagnostic check printoul, attachcd herein as Exhibit "H."
79. In regards 10 the five calibration checks performed, onc printoul is
generated to retlectlhe readings of all five calibralion checks. See sample oflhe calibralion
report, attached herein as Exhibit "I."
80. The simulated tests include the brealh lube lesl; insufficicnl sample lest;
radio frequency interferent tcst; reset tesl; digital display lest; general condilion check; invalid
402
sample lest; interferent test; involid test and a print test. If there are any errors with any of the
tests, the IntDxilyzer machine will ab011 that test.
81. The breath tube test ensures that the tube is properly heated. The results of
this test are entered manually.
82. The insufficient sample test ensures that enough air is breathed into the
tube for analysis. The results of this test generate a printout. See sample of an insufticient
sample test printout, attached herein as Exhibit "J."
83. The radio frequency interferent ("RFI") test ensures that the RFI detector
is working properly. The results of this test generate a printout. Se.',' sample of an RFI test
printout, ..ttaehed herein as Exhibit "K."
84. The reset button test ensures that this button is working properly. This test
is a visual inspection and there i~ no printout generated. Rather, the result is handwritten on the
"Police Laboratory Calibration Report." See sample of Police Laboratory Calibration Report,
attached herein as Exhibit "L."
85. The digital display tcst cnsures that the display where the reading of the
aleohol test is shown is working properly. This test is 0 visual inspection and there is no printout
generated. Rather, the result is handwritten on the "Police Laboratory Calibration Report." See
Exhibit "L."
86. The general condition inspection examines the general condition of the
machine. This test is a visuol inspection and there is no printout generated. Rather, the result is
handwritten on the "Police Laboratory Calibration Report." See Exhibit "L."
87. The invalid sample test ensures that the Intoxilyzer machine is able to
distinguish between alcohol present in the subject's mouth and alcohol present in deep lung air.
403
The results of this test generate a printout. See, sample of the invalid samplc test printout,
attached herein as Exhibit "M."
88. The interferenl check ensurcs that the machine is able 10 distinguish
between alcohol and another substance. This check involves two tests - one with acetone and
one with methanol. If the machinc is working properly, it will be able to subtract the acetone
from the alcohol content and will gencrate an "Interferent subtracted" printout. If the machine is
able to detect the methanol separate from the alcohol, it will generate an "Interferent detected"
printout. See, sample oflnterferenttest printout, attached herein as Exhibit "N."
89, An invalid test ensures that if the technician commits a procedural error, the
machine will abort the test. Thc invalid test results generate a printout. See, sample of Invalid
Test printout, attached herein as Exhibit "0."
The Undisclosed Records Rnd Information are Exempt from Disclosure
90. The records sought by Petitioner are exempt from disclosure pursuant to
N.Y. Public Officers Law §87(2)(e)(i), also known as the Interference Exemption, which
proscribes the disclosurc of law enforcemcnt records, which, if disclosed, would interfere with a
pending judicial proceeding, This section applies to the disclosure of records during a criminal
prosecution and any subsequent proceeding within the same prosecution.
91. FOIL's Interference Exemption protects all types of judicial proceedings
from the interference that would result from the premature disclosure of law enforcement
records. The exemption does not spccify a particular type of judicial proceeding to any particular
phase within a judicial proceeding.
92. Access to the records requested by the Petitioner with regards to the
calibration and maintenance records of all Intoxilyzer 500DEN machines owned or maintained by
404
tile NYPD since January 2008, was appropriately denied under Public Olliccrs Law §87(2)(e)(i)
because disclosure would interfere with ongoing DWI prosecutions in all five New York City
boroughs.
93. As embodied in Article 240 of the Criminal Procedure Law ("CPL"),
records relating to the maintenance and calibration of the Intoxilyzer machines are discoverable
in pending criminal DWI prosecutions.
94. Specifically, in a prosecution of an offense proscribed by the Vehicle and
Traffic Law, CPL §240.20(J)(k) provides for the disclosure of:
any written repOrl or document, or portion thereof, concerning

a physical examination, a seienti lie test or experiment, including
the most recent record of inspection or calibration or repair of
machines or instruments utilized \0 perJbrm such scientific tests
or experiments and the certification certificate,
ifany, held by the operator of the machine or
instrument, which tests or examinations were made by
01' at the request or direction of a public servant
engaged in law enforcement activity or which was made
by a person whom the prosecutor intends to call as a
witness at trial, or which the people intend to introduce at trial.
95. Under this statute, a DWIIDUI defendant is entitled to the most recent
calibration records, the most recent field test preceding the defendant's reporl and the results of
the defendant's test.
96. Defendants in DWIIDUI prosecutions routinely request and are denied access by
the Courlto calibration or maintenance records for prior years. As such, disclosure of these
records pursuant to FOIL would interfere with the rulings of the criminal co Uri and would
ultimately usurp the criminal judge's authority in the criminal matter 10 decide issues of
disclosure. Releasing those records to the public under FOIL would nullify any decision by the
Criminal Court judge allOWing the District Attorney's Office to withhold from disclosure those
405
same records.
Ongoing DWI nro..eutions
97. Assistant District Attorney ("ADA") Joseph McCormack, Chief of Vehicular
Crime Proseculion in Bronx County, New York, has provided an affitmation providing the
number of open OWl prosecutions in all five boroughs from 2008 to 20\ 2. ADA McCormack is
an expert in the field of criminal prosecution of DWI/DUI offenses. Sec Affirmation by Assistant
District Attorney Joseph McCormack, dated May 2, 2013, attached herein as Exhibit "P."
98. The disclosure of the rccords at issue hcrein include the calibration and field test
records of lhe Intoxilyzer machines. These records have been and continue to be the subjecl of
conflict during the discovery phases of these cases. ADA McCormack is fully aware of the types
of materials sought by criminal defense attorneys during discovery in DWlfDUI cases and
further is aware of the types of records disclosed by prosecutors in accordance with CPL
§240.20(1)(k). It is ADA McCormack's expert opinion that the disclosure of these records under
FOIL would interfere with discovery in numerous pending and future criminal DWl/DUI
prosccutions.
99. Assistant District Attorney McCom1ack from the Bronx County
District Attorney's Office conducted a query of the Bronx County District Attorney's database.
Pursuant to that query, in Bronx County, oVer 1,200 DWI prosecutions are still pending, from
2008 to 2013. The breakdown of the number of cases by year is as follows:
a. For 2008, thcre are 9 open OWl cases;
b. for 2009, there are 23 open DWI cases;
c. for 20 10, there are 110 open OWl cases;
d. for 2011, there are 241 open OWl cases;
e. for 2012, there are 552 open DWl cases and

406
L for 2013, there are 304 open OWl cases.
See Exhibit "1''' at 1114.
100. Assistant District Attorney Jill I-Ioexler from New York County District
Attorney's Office conducted a query of the New York County District Attorney's database,
Pursuant to that query, in New York County, over 1,600 DWI prosecutions are still pending,
from 2008 to 2013, The breakdown of the number of cases by year is as follows:
a. For 2008, there are 59 open OWl cases;
b. for 2009, there are 60 open OWl cases;
c. for 2010, there are 80 open DWI cases;
d. for 2011, there are 176 open DWl cases;
e. for 2012, there are 650 open DWl cases and
1'. for 2013, there are 342 open OWl cases.
See Exhibit "Q" at ~ 4.
101, Assistant District Attorney Adam Silberlight from Richmond County District
Attorney's Office conducted a query of the Richmond County District Attorney's d~tabase.
Pursuant to that query, in Richmond County, over 300 OWl prosec\ltion are still pending, from
2009 to 201 J. The breakdown of the number of cases by year l are as follows:
a, For 2009, there are 2 open OWl cases;
b, for 2010, there ure 6 open DWI cases;
c, for 2011, there are ]9 open OWl cases;
d, for 2012, there are 164 open OWl cases;
f for 201 3, there are 95 open OWl cases.
See Exhibit "R" at 114,
I Richmond Counly docs not have any open OWl cases for 2008
407
102, Assistant Distri~t Attorney Karen Rankin from Queens County District
Attorney's Otrice conducted a query of the Queens County District Attorney's database,
Pursuant to that query, over on~ thousand OWl prose~utions are still pending, from 2008 until
2013. The breakdown of the number of cases by year are as follows:
a. POl' 2008, there is one open OWl case;
b, for 2009, there is one open DWI case;
c. for 2010, there are 7 open OWl cases;
d, for 2011, there are 52 open OWl cases;
e. for 2012, there arc 428 open OWl cases and
f. for 2013, there are 537 open OWl cases.
See Exhibit "S" at ~ 4.
103. Assistant District Attorney Craig Esswein from Kings County District
Attorney's Office conducted a query of the Kings County District Attorney's database. Pursuant
to thtll query, in Kings County, over one thousand OWl prosecutions are still pending, from 2008
until 2013. The breakdown of the number of cases by year are as follows:
a, For 2008, there are 13 open OWl cases;
b. for 2009, there are 12 open OWl ~ases;
c. for 20 J 0, there are 50 open OWl cases;
d. for 2011, there are 96 open OWl cases;
e. for 2012, there are 445 open OWl cases and.
e. for 2013, there are 395 open OWl cases,
Sec Exhibit "T" at ~ 4.
104. Except for a small percentage of cases in which the criminal defendanl
408
refused to participate, each of these cases involve the use of an lntoxilyzer SOOOEN maehine.
Thus, the total number of pending prosecutions in New York City involving lntoxilyzer SOOOEN
machines exceeds three thousand. See 11s 4 from Exhibits" Q" - "U."
105. Petitioner is a criminal defense attorney who frequently defends OWl
offenses and is familiar with the forensic discovery issues related to breath testing. In fact, on
the Petitioner's website, it states tllat "The Law Offices of Adam D. Perlmutter concentrates on
New York OWl defense. Adam Perlmutter and his team have defended hundreds of New York
OWl / DUI cases." See http://adplegal.com/practice-areas/dwi-defensel 11 is clear that the
Petitioner intends to use such records for criminal defense of OWIIDUI cases and is trying to
circumvent the statutory discovery limitations set by CPL§240.20(1)(k) by requesting these
documents pursuant to FO IL.
AS AND FOR A FIRST DEFENSE, RESPONDENTS ALLEGE:
106. The records requested by Petitioner are exempt from FOIL disclosure
pursuant to N.Y. Public Officers Law §87(2)(e)(i), in that the documents are compiled for law
enforcement purposes and would interfere with law enforcement investigations and ongoing
prosecutions. Accordingly, disclosure of the law enforcement records sought under FOIL would
interfere with numerous pending and future prosecutions and are exempt from disclosure.
AS AND FOR A SECOND DEFENSE, RESPONDENTS ALLEGE:
107. The records requested by Petitioner are exempt from FOIL disclosure
pursuant to N.Y. Public Oflieers Law §87(2)(a), in that disclosure of the requested documents
under FOIL would expand the scope of discovery permitted under Criminal Procedure Law
§240.20(1 )(k).
409
AS AND FOR A THIRD DEFENSE, RESPONDENTS ALLEGE:
108, Respondents' denial of Petitioner's FOIL request was lawful and proper
in every respect and mandated by law,
AS AND FOR A FOURTH DEFENSE, RESPONDENTS ALLEGE:
109, The records requested by Petitioner are exempt from FOIL disclosure
pursuant to N,Y. Public Officers Law §87(2)(g) in that the records are intra-agency materials.
AS AND FOR A FIFTH DEFENSE, RESPONDENTS ALLEGE:
110. As petitioner is proceeding pro se, it is not entitled to an award of
attorneys' fees if he should prevail in this proceeding.
WHEREFORE, by virtue of the foregoing and of the annexed exhibits and
memorandum of law, Respondents respectfully request that this Court deny the Petition and
dismiss this proceeding, and grant such other and further relief as may be just and proper.
The undersigned counsel certifies that, to the best of my knowledge, information and
belief, fomled after a reasonable inquiry, the presentation of the within litigation papers and of
the contcntions therein, is not frivolous as defined in subsection (c) of 130-1. I.

May 2,2013
MICHAEL A. CARDOZO
Corporation Counsel of the
City of New York
AHorney for Dcfendant
>_
100 Church Street, Room 2-121
New York, New York I Q007 ,
(2I2) 788~l.fJ,t.
By. /i J~\
'trJ
I /
S. 1l:H witz
'\.,s;sl;["1 Corporation Counsel
410
VERIFICATION
STATE OF NEW YORK )

: 8.S.:
COUNTY OF NEW YORK. )
Lori Hernandez, being dUly sworn, deposes and says that she is an
DEPUTY MANAGING ATIORNEY in the Legal Bureau of the New York City Police
Department; that the reason why this VERIFICATION is not made by the respondent is
that your deponent has been duly designated by the Police Commiasioner of the New
York City Police Department, pursuant to Section 1101, subdivision (a) of the New York
City Charter, to act on said Commissioner's behalf for the purpose of verifying the
pleadings herein; that she has read the foregoing Amended Verified Answer aod knows
the contents thereof to be true except as to matters therein alleged upon information and
belief and as to those matters, she believes them to be true, that the source of this
information and the basis for her belief are the books and records of the New York City
Police Department and other departments of the city government and/or from statements
made to her by certain officers or agents of The City ofNcw York.
~~-
-_..:-:.=.. Lori Hernandez - - - - - - -
Sworn to before me on z.. day

of MA'1 :z.. ,2013
JL~ )Q.IAvI~-
NotaryY,~blic
AMENDED VERIFIED PETITION DAYIIJ G. GOLDF'A1UI, Notary Public
Perlmutter v. NYCPDI et 81 Stalo DfN"", York, No, 02G06l24896
Index No,: 1002201\l
Supmnc Ccun of the State of New York ClJlJ1mlsBjon Now y~-z,~f~
QIUI1iDed inExplros M.l(]
CQunty ofNcw York
41 I
EXHIBIT A - ANNEXED TO AMENDED VERIFIED ANSWER

Letter, Dated August 30, 20 I2,
Access Officer NYC Police Department
REPRODUCED SUPRA PP. 347-350

412
EXHIBIT B - ANNEXED TO AMENDED VERIFIED ANSWER

Letter, Dated September 20,2012, from Richard
Mantellino, to NYPD FOIL Unit
REPRODUCED SUPRA PP. 373-375

413
EXHIBIT C - ANNEXED TO AMENDED VERIFIED ANSWER

Letter, Dated September 25, 2012,
to Jonathan Da vid
(pp.413-415)
414
LAw OFFICES OF ADAM D. PERLMUTTER, P.C.

A'I'TORNEVSAT LAw
260 MADISON AVENUE, SUITE' 800

NEW YORK, NY '00 f 6
TE...-(212) 6~g..1990
FAX. (212) 679-'995
AD.\M g. PIIIU:U i i iA, DQ, lWCll_
PAU"GRDNP1IUt,~
JIIaI.... I.OV-.Jau... - .
September 25, 2012
VIA CERTIFIED MAD.

Jonutban David
~rds Access Appeals Officer
New York City Pollce Department
One Police Plaza, Room 1406
New YoIle, NY 10038·1497
Dear Mr. David:

I am writing to appeal the denial ofmy FOIL request, file # 2012·PL-5804, dated
September 20, 2012. My request Is for a copy of all records relating to the calibration
tmd maintenance of the NYPD's Intoxi1yzer 5OO0EN machines. A copy of my initial
n:quest is annexed hereto.
The letter denying my request Is based upon Public Officers Law § 87(2)(e)(i),
which allows for an agency to withhold documents if such records or information will
interfere with law enforcement investigations or judicial proceedings. 'Ibis terse denial
lacks the required "portieu1Jlrlzcd III1d specific justifiCillion" for not disclosing n;questcd
documents. See Gould .... New Yorl; Ctty Police Dep't, 89 N.Y.2d 267, 277 (1996). As
you are no doubt aware. the Court of Appeals I'eCQIltly clarified in Lesher Y. Hyner. 19
N.Y.3d 57, 67 (2012):
Acriminal prosecution Js II partlcular kind of enforcement proceedIng where

dlsdosure of particular kinds of Investlgatory records while a case Is pending
would generally Interfere with enforcement proceedings. We emphasize that
this does not mean that every document in a law enforcement agency's
criminal case file is automaetcallY exemptfrom dIsclosure simply because kept
there. The agency must Identify the generic kinds of documents for whl ch the
exemption Is clarned. and the generic risks posed by dIsclosure of these
categories ofdocuments.
415
~)rro ...o .... _pp ....

September 25. 2012
Page20f2
(emphasis added) (citations omitted) (inlcrna1 qUOtatioD marks omitted). Pleasc idenIlfy
what, if any. risks arc posed by the disclOSUle of1hesc documents.
I am requesting only the general dOClDl1CDts relating to the D18Chincs' calibration

-and testing, and not-results for the testing of any ODC lndividual.-As such, th_ are no
privacy eonccms, and no DCed for redactions. Furthermore, DumctOUS NYPD technicillllS
have testified that these documents are collected in the routine eoune ofbuslncss.
I thank you in adVllllcc for your bclp with this matter.
Sincerely,
Daniel A. McGuinness, Esq.

416
EXHIBIT D - ANNEXED TO AMENDED VERIFIED ANSWER

Letter, Dated December 3, 2012, from
Jonathan David to Daniel A. McGuinness
(REPRODUCED SUPRA PP. 382-383)

417
EXHIBIT E - ANNEXED TO AMENDED VERIFIED ANSWER

Sample Of Calibration Check Printout
(pp.417-418)
418
z
INTOXILYZER - ALCOHOL ANALYZER _~
MODEL 5000EN SN . . . . . . . . .
r ; •
TEST 'BrAe TIME
AIR-BLANK . 00.0. .0.9:.46EST .
CAL. CHECK .104 09: 46EST
AIR BLANK .000 09 :46EST
CAL. CHECK .104 09:47EST
CAL. CHECK .103 09: 47EST
NO. OF SAMPLES: 03
MEAN: .1036
STD. DEVIATION: .0005828
419
EXHIBIT F - ANNEXED TO AMENDED VERIFIED ANSWER

Sample of Internal Diagnostic Check Printout
(pp. 419-420)
420
.'7''71
.-
INTQXILYZER - ALCOHOL ANALYZER
MODEL SOOOEN SN -.--
DIAGNOSTIC TEST 09:42 EST
PROM CHECK PASSED

ZBO VER - G1776.12
SLAVE 7S 2240
RAM CHECK - PASSED
TEMP CHECK PASSED
PROCESSOR CHECK
MOTOR CHECK PASSED
EEPROM CHECK PASSED
SERIAL NO. MATCH PASSED
RANGE/STABILITY PASSED
AUTO CAL STATUS PASSED
RTC CHECK PASSED

INTERNAL STD PASSED
DIAGNOSTIC PASSED
PRINTER CHECK
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
0123456789
421
EXHIBIT G - ANNEXED TO AMENDED VERIFIED ANSWER

Sample of Police Laboratory Field Unit Inspection Report
(pp. 421-422)
422
NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT

POLICE LABORATORY
FIELD UNIT INSPECTION REpORT
~- ~ -IiiStfuinenT-----wTOJULYZER 5000EJir --~-l)"tc of IDspectioo _
Locatioo _
Intoxilyzer Serial # Simulator Serial # Lot # _
1._------
2. _
3. _
Diagnostic test _
Breath tube heated _
Printer check
Remarks
Rank J Name I Signatu~

Criminalisti~ Form 51 (Revision No.1 3-01, Datt Err. 0 InS/13. Page 2 or2, Issuing Authority: Deputy DirectorlOirectQr
423
EXHIBIT H - ANNEXED TO AMENDED VERIFIED ANSWER

Sample of Diagnostic Check Printout
(pp.423-424)
424
'IS
.-.
MODEL 500DEN SN '• •7
....
DIAGNOSTIC TEST 13 :16 EDT

----PROM,CHECk, PASSED
Z80 VER - G1776.12
SLAVE 75_2240
RAM CHECK PASSED
TEMP CHECK PASSED
PROCESSOR CHECK
MOTOR CHECK PASSED
EEPROM CHECK PASSED
SERIAL NO. MATCH PASSED
RANGE/STABILITY PASSED
AUTO CAL STATUS PASSED
RTC CHECK PASSED

INTERNAL STD PASSED
DIAGNOSTIC PASSED
PRINTER CHECK
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
0123456789
425
EXHIBIT I - ANNEXED TO AMENDED VERIFIED ANSWER

Sample of Calibration Report
(pp. 425-426)
426
-
MODEL SOOOEN
~
SN II I q,
TEST "'BrAC TIME

AIR BLANK .000 13 :17EDT
CAL .-CHECK- --- ---- -:-roo -- - --1J:17EDT
AIR BLANK .000 13: 18EDT
CAL. CHECK .099 13:1BEDT
AIR BLANK .000 13:1BEDT
CAL. CHECK .099 13: 1BEDT
AIR BLANK .000 13: 19EDT
AIR BLANK .000 13 :20EDT
NO. OF SAMPLES: 05
MEAN: .0990
STD. DEVIATION: .0007070
427
EXHIBIT J - ANNEXED TO AMENDED VERIFIED ANSWER

Sample of An Insufficient Sample Test Printout
(pp. 427-428)
428
e:ILYZER - ALCOHOL ANALYZER •••

MODEL SOOOEN SN . . . .3IJ
II ILL.
TEST "'BrAC TIME
AIR-BLANK. ··.-001) . 13 ,3')) EDT
*SUBJECT TEST .000 13 :42&0'1'
AIR BLANK .000 13:43EO'1'
* INSUFFICIENT SAMPLE - VALUE
PRINTED WAS HIGHEST OBTAINED.
429
EXHIBIT K - ANNEXED TO AMENDED VERIFIED ANSWER

RFI Test Printout
(pp. 429-430)
430
SN~. VERSION 01776.l:i

SLA~O
DATE ~b
1117_.... TIME _ E D , !
INVALID TEST
INHIBITED - RFI
431
EXHIBIT L - ANNEXED TO AMENDED VERIFIED ANSWER

Police Laboratory Calibration Report
(pp. 431-432)
432
POLICE lABORATORY
CALIBRATION REPORT
RECORD OF INTOXlLYZER 5000EN CALIBRATION

1_"'_lE I... 'RU••" .....".... 1'U I51"""""".......... I &IMlLA'OH"'","L\J'NO. l_ltJCA
_''"' _
Brnth Tube Healed _ Invalid Sample _

Insufficienl Sample _ Inlerferent _
RFI _ Invalid Tesl _
Resel _ Print Test _
Digital Display _
General Condition _
CALffiRAnON TESTS
1._------
2. _
3. _
4. _
5. _
Return InslIumenl to Proper Test Mode Initials _

Commenls _
Page 2 of2 Rank I NlU1IC I Sign.~

Technical Supc:rvi",r
CrimiDlLlimcs Fonn 56 (Revision No. 11-01, Dille Elf. 08f291t I, Page 2 ofZ, Issuing Authority: DircctarlDeputy Dtrector)
433
EXHIBIT M - ANNEXED TO AMENDED VERIFIED ANSWER

Invalid Sample Printouts
(pp.433-434)
434
..
INTOXILYZER - ALCOHOL ANALYZER _
MODEL SODDEN
7
SN
TEST "'BrAe TIME

-AIR -BIJINK -- . -.-000-- ---13-:-3-1EDT----- .....
INVALID SAMPLE .xxx 13:32EDT
INVALID SAMPLE
435
EXHIBIT N - ANNEXED TO AMENDED VERIFIED ANSWER

"Interferent Detected" Printout
(pp. 435-436)
436
II a;
. . . . .EN SN~
TEST 'BrAC TIME

CAL. CHECK .000 13 : 37EDT
AIR BLANK .000 13 : 37EDT
SUBJECT TEST .099 13:38EDT
INTERFERENT SUBTRACTED
437
EXHIBIT 0 - ANNEXED TO AMENDED VERIFIED ANSWER

Invalid Test Printout
(pp.437-438)
438
SN ' 7' VERSION G1776,l:;

SLAVE 75 2240
DATE' 7 ; 3·'51:'1 TIME Fl ED1
INVALID TEST
439
EXHIBIT P - ANNEXED TO AMENDED VERIFIED ANSWER

Affirmation of Joseph A. McCormack, Dated May 2, 2013
(pp.439-444)
440
MAY-~2-2013 ~5:12 From: 1718S902115
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE Of NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORK
--------x
In (he Malter or
THE LAW OFFICES OF Tndcx No.1 0022012013
ADAM D. PERLMUTTER, p.e., TAS PartJ6
(Ling.Cohan, 1.)
PeLilioner,
For a Judb'JIlcn( PU11iUW1( to Article 78 AFFffiMATlON IN

of the Civil Practice Law and Rules SUPPORT OF VERIFIED
ANSWER
·against·
and RA YMONO KELLY, in his official capacity lIS
Commissioncr of the New York City Police Department,
Respondellts.
----------··....··------··---------··..·------...--------------------x
JOSEPH A. M.CCORMACK, being an attorney admitted to practice hefore the
courts ofthis State. bcreby affu'ms under the penalties of perjury:
I. J am the Chief of Vehicular Crimc~ Bureau in the office of the District
Attorney, Bronx County (the "Bronx District Attomey's Office"). T have h.ldlhis plIsililln siocc
2007, and have heen employed allhe Bronx District Attorney·.q Office since 1986. Since 2007, I
have been designated by The Goveruor's Traffic Safety Committee a.~ the New York State
Traffic Resource Proseculor, in which capacity I sm responsible for statewide trainings of
Prosecutors and T,aw Enforcement pe.rsonnc1, "" well as s\.'tVing lIS • resourec on lnIftie ..rety rel.ted
proseeurioD.< statewide. I am 0 member of the Doord of Governors for the SL. John's University
School of Low Criminal Luw Tnstitute and hllve been un Adjunct Professor of Law at St. John's
Law S.ehool since. 1999. I also am on the teaching faculty of the National District Attorney's
Association at the National Advocacy Center in South Carolina, the New York Slale District
441
MAY-02-201305:12 From: 17185902116 Pclge:3"6
Attorney's Association at the New York Prosecutor's T",ininllln~lilule and the New York State
Judicial Inslilute al PIICC Unlvcnlty School of Law. I also l\IIl the Chair of the New York State
District Allorneys Association Vehicular Crimes Legislation S\lbeommittce, lind T have had
Wl'iting publisho:d in [he Sl. .Tohn's Law Review, The Empire State Proseeutol', The Impaired
Driving Update and The National Traffic Law Center's "Detween the Lines," I also have written
and edited practice guides for the Nlltionul Highway Trdffic Safety Administration I\lld was II
recipient of the NHTSA Nalitll1al Public Service Award in 2009.
2. In my career. I h.we personally pro~ccutcd over loo individuals for crimes

relating to the opcration of a motor vehicle following the consumption L)I" alcohol, slIch as driving
under the influence, driving while intoxicated, etc. 1 also have supervised the proseclItion of
over 10,000 such cases.
3. I submit this anirrnation in support of the Verified Answet submitted hy
lhe New York City Police Ocpartment ("NY.I'U") in lhi~ proceeding. This atTirmation is based
upon my pe.-nnal knowledge and my review of the record.. of the Bronx. District Attorocy's
Officc. I am fully familiar with the facts and circumstllnccs set foIth below.
4. Through my personal experience, including my interaction with
prosecutOI1l from the olher boroughs' District Attorneys' Otlkes, Tam intimatcly l1uuiliar with
the mMller in which alcohol-related rnotor vehicle crimes arc prosce\lted, the evidence necessary
to successfully prosecute such crime:;, !he Iypical defenscs raised by criminal defendants. the
procedural rules reluling to pre-trial discovery and the trial of such mailers.
5. 1u order to ~ucce5sfully prosccule such crImes, it is essential thai the
prosecutor's evidence or Ihe criminal defendant's alcohol-related impairment while driving be as

442
MAY-02-201305:12 From: 17185902116 Pne:4 / 6
accurate and credible as possible, Among the type~ ~lf evidence thai the prosccutOl' may use EIre
thc results of various test administered by the arresting policc ofticcr lit the time of the ofTense.
6. 011e typc of test is conducted using a Into~i1yzer 5000EN instrument.
These inslrumenl~ are u~e<l by NYPD pulice officers to test thll chcl11iual uompositioD of the
breath of drivers who are suspected of driving wb.ile drunk. WhOi'll warranted, thc results of
rnt()~,ly:;:cr tests arc used by the District Attomeys' ulliecs in all fivc boroughs to pr\lso:cute
criminal cases agail1slthese individuals.
7. PUISuant to N. Y. Criminal Pl'oclldure LlIw §240.20(l)(k), the pro.eeutor is
requircd to provide the cr.irnirul1 detendant only with thc most recent cuJibration or inspectiOIl of
the TntoxilY7.er instrumenl, the report of the chemical test performed on the criminal ddcn<lant,
and the certification of the individual who administered that teb'l.
8. Although criminal defendanls frequently attempt to uhtain less recent
information about the calibration and inspection of these instrumenlq through discovery, the
criminal courts hllve strictly cCln~lrw:d the statutory limitation set .forlh in enm. Pro. Law
§240.20(1 )(k), and routinely deny such discovery.
9. I understand thaL Pelitioner made 11 rcque~1 to the New York City Police
DepllIlrnenl pu",u~nl Iv U,c Preedom of Infonlllltion Low (Lhe "1'OlL Rcque.t"), .uckiDC all
calibration and maintenance rec~lTd,~ for aJllctoxilyzer 5000EN instrumcnts owned or mainLained
by the NVPD .inuc January 2008.
10. As lhi~ request secks records ol<lc:r than the most recellt calibralion and
maintenance records, this request would mos! likely be denied under erim. Pro. I.aw
§240,20(1)(k) if madc in the context ora criminal proceeding.
J
443
MAY-02-201305:12 Fcom:17185902116
I I. At worst, a determination by this C01ut lhat such recurds should he
disclosed would clearly u.wrp the criminal court judge's aULhority 10 dclcl'mine the scope of
di~covery in specific pro5Ceutions the.lI-pending lIud to be brought before the criminal court.
12. UpL!n in formatiun lUId bc]jct~ Petitioner is a elim inal d~fCn>e ~llomey who
frequcntly represents individUllb who have been arrcsted for drunk driving. 11 is inconccivable
that Pelilioner is unaware of the discovery limilatio~ imposed by Crim. Pro. Low §240.20(1)(k).
l'hu:l. it appears that Petitioner is using FOIL 10 have this Court mle on a maller which falls
within Ihe purview and discretion uf the criminal court judge undtll" Crim. Pro. Law
§240.20(l)(k), and as II deliherate means to circumvent the discovery limitations unposw hy lhe
statute.
13. AI NVPD's request, 1 have reqlle~led the borough District Allomey' 5
OlJices Lo compile the number of DWl prosecutions current.ly pending in the respective
boroughs. These results arc set forth in the lIL'Companying affirmations sub milled wilh NYPD's
Verified Answer.
14. The results of my search lur such Pl'osecution~ cum:nlly pending in The
Rrnnx, hascd em year of arrest, are as follows:
2003 -1
2004 - 1
2006·- 1
2007 - 6
2008 -- 9
2009 - 23
2010 - 110
2011 - 241
2012 -- 552
2013 - 304
15. Except for a smull percentage of clIses in which the crinliruJ.l defendant
.
refused to participate (in my experience under 20%), e~eh of these ca~es involve the use of an
4
444
MAV-02-2013 05:12 From: 17185902116
Intoxilyur 111l>"trumenl. Thus, in The Bronx, there currently are appn)ximatcly 1000 criminll1
pmsl'Culions peuding which involve the use of an TntllxilyLcr Instrument.
16. Disclosure of the requested records would inler lere with the prosecution of
these pending cases, as it would result in the disclosure of documents to whieh a criminll.l
defenwml is not entitled under Crim. Pro. Law §240.20( I)(k). Alternatively. the application of
this s(alulc to a particul&.r elISe and the determination ofwhelhcr the criminal defcndunl should be
proVided documents less recent than (hose required to be produced is properly left to the
judgment oftbe criminal court judges presiding over those speciJic matters. Thus. a deci~iol1 in
this proceeding that requires disclo~lIte of the requested documenl~ would intertbre with the
criminal c"urts' ability 10 IDlIIlagc the orderly c"nullel of lheir own cases <md, in particular.
would tlSUrp the abilily of "Tintinal court judges to manu!:e pre-trial discovery and Wlllllu
undoubtedly unnecessarily burden these Cllurt.~ with issues relating to the admissibility of
document' whieh might otherwise ha~e been unavailable throutlh disC(lvery.
Dated: IJro~)<, New York

May 2, 2013
<
445
EXHIBIT 0 - ANNEXED TO AMENDED VERIFIED ANSWER

Affinnation of Jill Hoexter, Dated May 2, 2013
(pp. 445-447)
446

COUNTY OF NEW YORK
·---·---···--·-·-·----·-----x
In the Malter of
. .-. - .. -THE-LAW OFFICES-OF· .Indel< No.-10022012013

ADAM D. PERLMU'ITER, P.C., lAS Part 36
(Ling·Cohan, J.)
Petitioner,
For a Judgment PursU8Dt to Article 78 JILL HOEXTER

of the Civil Practice Law and Rules AFFIRMATION IN
SUPPORT OF VERIFIED
·against· ANSWER
NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT.
and RAYMOND KELLY. in his official capacity as
Commissioner of the New York City Police Department.
Respondenls,
-·---··-···-··----·······--··-···-····--····--···---x
JILL HOEXTER, being an attorney admitted to pmctice before the courts of this
State. hereby alfll1T\s under the penalties of perjury:
I. I am an Assistant District Attorney in the office of the District Attorney,
New York County (the "New York District Attorney Office"). I have held this position for 20
years. In my career, I have personally prosecuted numerous individuals for crimes relating to the
opemtion of a motor vehicle foUowing the consumption of alcohol, such as driving under the
influence, driving while intoxicated, etc. I· also have supervised the prosecution of tens of
thousands of such cases in my almost 13 years as the Co·Chief of the Vehicular Crimes Unit and
Chief of the Unlicensed Drivers Unit.
2. I submit this affinnation in support of the Verified Answer submitted by
the New York City Police Department (uNYPD") in this proceeding. This affinnation is based
447
upon my personal knowledge and my review of the records of the New York County District
Attorney's Office. I am fully familiar with the facts and cm:umstances set forth below.
3. At NYPD's request, forwarded to me though the Office of the District
Attorney. Bronx County, I compiled data regarding the number of prosecutions currently
pending in the New York District Attorney's Office involving the operation of a motor vehicle
after the consumption of alcohol.
4. The results of my search, based on year of arrest, are as follows:
2008··59
2009 - 60
2010 - 80
2011-176
2012 - 650
2013 -- 342
5. Except for those cases in which the criminal defendant refused to take the
Intoxilyzer SODDEN test (in my experience approximately 33%), each of these pending
prosecutions involve the use of an Intoxilyzer 5000EN machine, which is used by NYPD police
officers to lest the chemical composition of the breath of drivers who are suspected of driving
while drunk.
6. Thus, in New York County, there currently are over 1300 criminal
prosecutions pending which involve the use of an Intoxilyzer machine.

May 2, 2013
2
448
EXHIBIT R - ANNEXED TO AMENDED VERIFIED ANSWER

Affinnation of Adam Silberlight, Dated May 2, 2013
(pp. 448-450)
449
SUPREME COURT OF TIIE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORK
. ·· ·· ···.__•·.• ·•·__·_·x
In the Matter of
--TIm tAW OFFICES OF Index No. 100220120I3
ADAM D. PERLMUTIER, P,C., lAS Part 36
(Ling·Cohan, J.)
Petitioner,
For a Judgment PUI1IUlIlIt to Article 78 SILBERLIGBT

of the Civil PI'IlCtice Law end Rules AFFIRMATION
IN SUPPORT OF
·against. VERIFIED ANSWER
and RAYMOND KELLY, in bis official capacity as
Commissioner of the New York City Pollee Department,
Respondents.
.--·-··--·--····-·-·----··-···-··-···-·-·-········-x
ADAM SILBERLIGHT, being an attorney admitted to practice before the courts
ofthis State, hereby affirms under the penalties ofpeIjury:
1. I am an Assistant District Attorney in the office of the District Attorney,
Richmond County (the "Staten Island District Attorney's Office"). I have held this'!*lsitioR-for
approximately eleven and a half yem. IIi ,my carUI', I have personally prosecuted over three
hundred individuals for crimes relating to the operation of a motor vehicle folloWing the
consumption of alcohol, such as driving under the influence, driving while intoxicated, etc.. I
also have supervised the prosecution ofover one thousand of suqh cases..
2. I submit this affirmation iiI support of the Verified Answer submitted by
the New York City Police Department ("NYPD") in this proceeding. This affirmation is based
upon my personal knowledge and my review of the records of the Staten Island District
Attorney's Office. I am fully familinr with the facts and circumstances set forth below.
450
3. At NYPO's request, forwarded to me though the Office of the District
Attorney, Bronx Coimty, I compiled da\8 regarding the number of prosecutions cunently
pending in the Staten Island District Attorney's office involving the operation of a motor vehicle
after the.consumption.ofalcohol.
4. The results of my search, the number of misdemeanor prosecutions for
driving while intoxicated CUDWI"), based on year of arrest, are as follows:
2009 - 2
2010 - 6
2011- 39
2012 -- 164
2013 -- 9S
There also are approximately twenty felony OWl .prosecutions pending.
. .
S. . Except for a small percentage of cases In which the criminal defendant
refused to participate (in my experience approximately twenty percent), each of these cases
involve the use of an Intoxllyzer SOOOEN machine, which is used by NYPO police officers to
tellt the chemical composition of the brellth of driveIll who are suspected of driving while drunk.
6. Thus, in Staten Island, there currently over 300 criminal prosecutions
pending which involve the use of an Intoxilyzer machine.
Dated: Staten Island, New York

May 2, 2013
2
451
EXHIBIT S - ANNEXED TO AMENDED VERIFIED ANSWER

Affirmation of Karen Rankin, Dated May 2, 2013
(pp.451-453)
452
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

COUNTY
_ _ _ . OF NEW YORK. ••_ _x
In the Matter of
THE LAW OFFICES OP InoCXNO:""l 0022012013
ADAM D. PERLMUTfBR, P.C., IAS Part 36
(LIng-Cohan, J.)
Petitioner,
For a Judgment PunIlllDt to Article 7g RANKIN AFFIRMATION

of the Civil Pra<:tlce Law and Rulea IN SUPPORT OF
YERIllIED ANSWER
-against-
NEW YORK. CITY POLlCE DEPARTMENT,

and RAYMOND KELLY, in his official capacity as
Commissioner of the New YoIle City Police Department,
Respondents.
-_ _ __.. ~ x
KAREN RANKIN, being an attorney admitted to practice before the courlll of
this State, hereby Bffums under the penalties of petjury:
1. 1 am an Assistant District Attorney in the office of the District Attorney,
Queens County (the "Queens District Attorney's Officc"). I have held this position for 22 yCBrll.
In my career, 1 have personally prosecuted over SO individuals for crimea relating to the
operation of a motor vehicle following the consumption of alcohol, such as driving under the
influence, driving while intoxicated, etc.. I also have supervised the prosecution of over several
hundred such cases.
2. I submit this affumation in support of the Verified Answer suhmltted by

~
the New York City Police Department C'NVPD") in this proceeding. This afIlnnation is based
upon my personal knowledge and my review of the records of the Queens District Attorney's
Office. I am fully familiar with the facts and circwnstances set forth below.
453
3. At NYPO's request, forwarded to me though the OfIice of the District
Attorney, Bronx County, I compiled data regarding the number of prosecutions cum:ntly
pending in the Queens District Attorney's offi~ involving the operation of a motor vehicle after
the consumption ofalcohol.
4. The results of my search, the number of miBdcmeanor prosecutions for
driving while intoxicated ("OWl"), based on year of anest, an: as follows:
1999· 1
2008 -1
2009 -1
2010 -7
2011- 52
2012 - 428
2013 - 537
S. Ilxcept for a small percentage of cases in which the criminal defendant
re1ilsed to participate (in my experience under 20"10), each of these cases involve the usc of an
Intoxilyzer SOOOEN machine, which Is l15ed by NYPD police officers to test the chemical
composition of the breath of drivers who an: suspected of driving while dnmk.
6. Thus, in Queens. there currently arc over 800 criminal prosecutioWi
pending which involve the use of an Intoxilyzer machine. .
Dated: Queens, New York

May2,2013
2
454
EXHIBIT T - ANNEXED TO AMENDED VERIFIED ANSWER

Affirmation of Craig Esswein, Dated May 2,2013
(pp. 454-456)
455
KeDA illoo%
05/01/13 WED 08:43 FAl 7182502188

COUNTY OF NEW YORK
---------------------~"
In the Mattef of
'I'HffI:AW OFFICES OF lndC)(No.I0022012013
ADAM D. :PERLMUTTER, P.C., lAS Pm 36
(Ling-Cohan, J.)
Petitioner,
For a Judgment Pursuant to Article 78 ESSWEIN AFFIRMATION IN

ofthe Civil Practice Law and Rule~ SUPPORT OF VERIFIED
ANSWER
-against-
NEWYORKCITYPOUCEDEPARlMENT,
and RAYMOND KELLY. in hill officill! oopacity as
Coxumissioner of the New York City Police Department,
R~ondent.!l.
---- -x
CRAIG ESSWElN, being IItl atttllney admitted to p'tilctice before the courts of
this State, ha:eby affirmg under the penalties of pCljury:
I. I am an Assistant District Attorney in the office of the District Attomcy,
Kings County (the "Brooklyn District Attomcy Office''). I have held tbis position for 16 years.
In my career, ] have p=onally prosecuted or supervised the prosecution of hundreds of
individuals for eriIDes relatiDg to the opetation of a motor "Vchicle following the coDSUItlptl.on of
Il!cohol, such as driving under the influence, driving wle intoxicated, etc.
2. ] submit this affinnwon in support of the Verified AIJswcr submitted by
the New York City Police Department ("NYPD'') in this proceeding. This affirmation is based
upon my personal knowledge and my review of the records of the Brooklyn District Attomey's
Office. I am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances set forth below.
456
05/01/13 WED 08:43 FAX 7182502188 KeD'" Iai 003
3. At NYPD' s request, I compiled data regarding the number ofprosecutions
currently pe.c.ding in the Brooklyn District Attorncy's office jnvolvillg the operatiOD of a motor
vehicle after the cODSUlllption of alcohol.
4. Tho results ofmy search, based 011 the y= of mest, are as follows:
2007-3
200K-13
2009 -12
2010 _. SO
2011- 96
2012··445
2013 - 395
5. Except for a small peICentage of cases in which the criminal defendant
refused to participate (in my experience under 30%), each of these cases involve the use of an
Intoxilyzer SOOOEN machine, which is used by NYPD police OfficerB to test the cbemical
composition of the breath of drivers wbo are suspected of driving while druDk.
6. Thus, in Brooklyn, there currently are over 700 criminal proSecutiollS
pending which involve the use ofan Intoxilyzer machine.
Dated: Brooklyn, New York

May 2,2013
By: ---::::-:--:-:-=-1=:--.,----"
CRAIG SSWElN
2
457
STATEMENT OF NO OTHER OPINION
No other opinion was rendered herein other than that which appears at page 8.
458
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO CPLR 2105
I, LARRY A. SONNENSHEIN, an attorney in the office of ZACHARY W.
CARTER, Corporation Counsel, attorney for the appellant herein, do hereby certify, pursuant to
CPLR 2IOS, that the foregoing reproduced record on appeal has been compared with the original
papers on file in the office of the Clerk of the County of New York, and has been found to be a
true and complete copy thereof.

June 30, 2014
LARRY A. SONNENSHEIN
LARRY A. SONNENSHEIN

Record On Appeal For Article 78 FOIL Action

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Record On Appeal For Article 78 FOIL Action

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK'S INDEX NO.

NEW YORK SUPREME COURT

THE LAW OFFICES OF ADAM D. PERLMUTTER, P.C., for a

NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, and RAYMOND

LAW OFFICE OF ADAM D. PERLMUTTER, P.C.,

Reproduced on Recycled Paper

Pre-Argument Statement in Lieu of

Respondents' Notice of Appeal, dated October 29,2013 5

Order Appealed from and Memorandum Decision

Notice of Verified Petition, Dated January 31,2013 20

Verified Petition, Sworn to January 29,2013,

Exhibit A - NYPD Highway Patrol Procedural Guide 39

Exhibit B - Trial Transcript in People v. Lopresti,

Exhibit C - Article, Dated March 2006,

Exhibit D - Diagnostic Test Results 269

Exhibit E- Calibration check printout sheet 271

Exhibit F - NYPD Field Unit Inspection Report 273

Exhibit G - NYPD Field Unit Inspection Report 275

Exhibit H - NYPD Calibration Report,

Exhibit I - Police Department Certification of

Exhibit J - Intoxilyzer 5000 Operator's Manual 281

Exhibit K- Printout reflecting the readings of

Exhibit L - Inhibited RFI printout.. 316

Exhibit M - Interferent detected and

Exhibit N- Invalid Sample Printout 321

Exhibit 0 - Invalid Test Printout 323

Exhibit P - Insufficient Sample Printout 325

Exhibit Q- NYPD Maintenance Log for each

Exhibit R - Excerpt of Transcript, Dated July 23,2012,

Exhibit S - Examples from the Alcohol Testing Program,

Exhibit T - Letter, Dated August 30, 2012,

Exhibit U - Affidavit of Service, Sworn to August 31, 2012 371

Exhibit V - Letter, Dated September 20, 2012, from Richard

Exhibit W - Letter, Dated September 25,2012,

Exhibit Y - Letter, Dated December 3,2012, from

Exhibit Z - Letter, Dated October 15, 1980,

Amended Verified Answer,

Exhibit A - Letter, Dated August 30, 2012,

Exhibit B - Letter, Dated September 20, 2012, from Richard

Exhibit C - Letter, Dated September 25,2012,

Exhibit D - Letter, Dated December 3,2012, from

Exhibit E- Sample of Calibration check printout.. .417

Exhibit F - Sample ofIntemal Diagnostic check printout .419

Exhibit H - Sample of Diagnostic check printout. .423

Exhibit I - Sample of Calibration Report .425

Exhibit J - Sample of an Insufficient Sample Test printout .427

Exhibit K - RFI test printout.. .429

Exhibit L - Police Laboratory Calibration Report .431

Exhibit M - Invalid Sample printouts .433

Exhibit N - "Interferent Detected" printout .435

Exhibit 0 - Invalid Test printout .437

Exhibit P - Affinnation of Joseph A. McConnack, Dated May 2, 2013 .439

Exhibit Q - Affirmation of Jill Hoexter, Dated May 2, 2013 .445

Exhibit R - Affirmation of Adam Silberlight, Dated May 2, 2013 .448

Exhibit S- Affirmation of Karen Rankin, Dated May 2, 2013 .451

Exhibit T- Affirmation of Craig Esswein, Dated May 2, 2013 .454

Statement of No Other Opinion 457

Certification Pursuant to CPLR 2105 458

THE LAW OFFICES OF

For a Judgment Pursuant to Article 78

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that the Responden'ts-AppellantS, for their pre-

argument statement, allege as follows:

Petitioner-Respondent: THE LAW OFFICES OF THE LAW OFFICES OF,