Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
2
(2)
A hairpin slot is also etched from the feed line and its effective
length is about half a guided wavelength long calculated at the
center frequency of the RFID, 6.8 GHz.
th d d H L 2 3 1 2 _ (3)
eff
f
c
H L
H u u
2
(4)
A symmetric closed slots from the two ground planes are also
etched out whose effective lengths are half a guided
wavelength long calculated at center frequency, 8.1 GHz, of
the downlink of X-band satellite communication systems.
2 2 1 _ ww ll l l S L (5)
eff
f
c
S L
H u u
2
(6)
At first, analysis was made with only the inverted U shaped
slot in the patch. It is observed that as the vertical length of the
slot is increased, the band shifts towards lower frequency. By
a series of parametric study the optimized value of the width
and the position of the inverted U type slot are determined and
a
1
is fixed at 6.4 mm. A good band rejection is obtained at 5.5
GHz by analyzing this slot. Fig. (4) Shows the effect of the
slot width on the simulated VSWR of the antenna.
Next, the effect on the dimensions of the hairpin is studied. As
the length of the hairpin, d1 is increasing the notched band
shifts toward the low frequency range and as the thickness,
th1, is decreased it is shifted to the high frequency side. Thus,
after the simulations the best dimensions are taken and fixed at
d1= 4.4 mm and th1= 0.15 mm.
For obtaining the rejection band centered at 8.1 GHz, pair of
symmetric incomplete inverted C shaped slots is cut and
simulation studies are carried out. Again, after a series of
simulation and parametric studies, it is observed that by
varying its length, c1, and thickness, c2, the exact band
rejection centered at 8.1 GHz can be obtained.
(a) (b) (c)
Fig.3.Gemometry of the Slot (a) U Slot (b) Hairpin Slot (c)
Incomplete inverted C shaped slots
(a) (b)
Fig .2.Simulated VSWR of the basic antenna different
values of (a) g (b) wp
Fig.4.Simulated VSWR for varying a1& a2
(a) (b)
(a) (b)
Fig.5.Simulated VSWR for varying d1& th1
2014 International Conference on Signal Propagation and Computer Technology (ICSPCT) 431
TABLE I.
PARAMETERS OF ANTENNA (UNIT: MM)
Antenna
Parameter
Lsub Wsub Lg wp g dg W W1
Value(mm)
26.8 19 10 0.2 0.5 0 1.5 18
Slot
parameters
a1 a2 d1 d3 th th1 c1 c2
Value(mm)
6.4 0.5 4.4 0.7 3.9 0.15 0.5 6.2
Slot
parameters
L3 L2 lll ww1 ww2 a6
Value(mm)
2.8 7 6.2 0.5 0.4 10
III. RESULT AND DISCUSSION
This work is simulated in the CST microwave studio. The
overall size of the antenna is 19u 26.8 u0.762 mm
3
. The
radiator patch consists of an inverted U type slot to create a
notch at 5.5 GHz. A hairpin slot is etched from the feed line to
obtain the notch at 6.8 GHz. A pair of symmetric incomplete
inverted C shaped slot is cut from the ground to obtain a notch
centered at 8.1 GHz. The unique property of the antenna lies in
creating three band notches using three different closed slots in
the radiator patch, feed line and the ground planes respectively.
A wide impedance bandwidth is observed for this antenna
extending from 3 GHz to 12 GHz.
The current distribution is studied and is shown in Fig. (7).
Current density shows the formation of standing waves around
the slots at the respective band notches. At 5.5 GHz, current
density is maximum around the inverted U type slot etched
from the radiator patch. Again, it is observed that current is
concentrated around the hairpin slot at 6.8 GHz and at 8.1
GHz, current is maximum around the two inverted C shaped
slot in the ground planes. Thus, at this band a notched
frequency, current is concentrated around the closed slats
which restrict the flow of current towards the radiator patch.
This leads to impedance mismatch at the rejected frequencies
leading to less or no radiation at the notched frequencies. Fig.
(8) Shows simulated VSWR of the antenna with three notched
bands. It is observed that the antenna notches three intended
bands, while maintaining broadband performance withVSWR
less than 2, covering the entire UWB frequency band.
Fig. (9) Shows the simulated gain of the antenna. The gain
varies from 1.8 dBi to 4.3 dBi. The gain plot is almost flat
except at the notched frequencies where it falls abruptly since
radiation is not desired at those frequencies.
To study the time domain characteristics of the antenna, its
group delay is studied as shown in Fig. (10). The antenna is
non dispersive in nature as its group delay lies within 1 ns
except at the band notches where the delay is more as per
desire reaching up to 2ns.
(a) (b)
Fig.6. Simulated VSWR for varying c1& c2
(a) (b)
(c)
Fig.7 Surface current distribution (a) the first notched band, 5.5 GHz,
(b) the second notched band, 6.8 GHz, (c) the third notch band 8.1GHz.
Fig.8.Simulated VSWR of the antenna with three notch band
Fig.9 Gain plot of the antenna
432 2014 International Conference on Signal Propagation and Computer Technology (ICSPCT)
One of the challenges of the UWB antenna is to obtain Omni
directional radiation pattern. The simulated radiation pattern
shows fig. 11 omnidirectional radiation pattern in H-plane and
the dipole like pattern in E-plane. At higher frequencies, the
pattern is distorted due to the undulation in the pattern caused
by the propagation of higher order modes.
IV CONCLUSION
This paper proposes and analyzes a triple band rejection
monopole ultra wideband antenna. By etching an inverted U
shaped slot from the patch, the antenna shows good
suppression at 5.5 GHz. Etching of hairpin slot from the feed
line results in creating a notch at 6.8 GHz RFID band. A pair
of incomplete inverted C shaped slots contributes to rejection
band at 8.1 GHz satellite communication band. The gain of the
antenna varies from 1.8 dBi to 4.3 dBi with dips obtained at
rejection frequencies. The group delay profile shows a flat
response within 1 ns except at the rejection bands. This
confirms distortion less transmission of the antenna. The size
of the antenna is compact and it shows omnidirectional
characteristics, thus meeting the challenges of the UWB
antenna.
REFERENCES
1. Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Washington, DC,
First report and order in the matter of revision of Part 15 of the
Commissions rules regarding uwb transmission Systems.
2. Y. J. Cho, K. H. Kim, D. H. Choi, S. S. Lee, and S. O. Park, A
miniature UWB planar monopole antenna with 5-GHz band-
rejection filter and the time-domain characteristics, IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propag., vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 14531460, May 2006.
3. C.Y.Hong, C.W. Ling, I. Y. Tarn, and S. J. Chung, Design of a
planar ultrawideband antenna with a new band-notch structure,
IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 33913397,
Dec. 2007.
4. T. P. Vuong, A. Ghiotto, Y. Duroc, and S. Tedjini, Design and
characteristics of a small U-slotted planar antenna for IR-UWB,
Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 17271731, 2007.
5. Q. X. Chu and Y. Y. Yang, 3.5/5.5 GHz dual band-notch ultra-
wideband antenna, Electron. Lett., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 172174,
2008.
6. K. G. Thomas and M. Sreenivasan, A simple ultrawideband
planar rectangular printed antenna with band dispensation, IEEE
Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 2734, Jan. 2010.
7. H.W. Liu, C. H. Ku, T. S.Wang, and C. F. Yang, Compact
monopole antenna with band-notched characteristic for UWB
applications, IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 9, pp.
397400, 2010.
8. M. Abdollahvand, G. Dadashzadeh, and D. Mostafa, Compact
dual band-notched printed monopole antenna for UWB
application, IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 9, pp.
11481151, 2010.
9. M. M. S. Taheri,H. R.Hassani, and S. M. A. Nezhad, Compact
printed coplanar waveguide-fed ultra-wideband antenna with
multiple notched bands, Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., vol. 54, no.
9, pp. 21212126, 2012.
10. Zhu, F., S.-C. S. Gao, A. T. S. Ho, C. H. See, R. A. Abd-
Alhameed, J. Li, and J.-D. Xu, Design and analysis of planar
ultra-wideband antenna with dual band-notched function,"
Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 127, 523-536, 2012.
11. Azim, R., M. T. Islam, J. S. Mandeep, and A. T. Mobashsher, A
planar circular ring ultra-wideband antenna with dual band-
notched characteristics," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and
Applications, Vol. 26, Nos. 14-15, 2022-2032, 2012.
12. Zhang, S.-M., F.-S. Zhang, W.-Z. Li, T. Quan, and H.-Y. Wu, A
compact UWB monopole antenna with WiMAX and WLAN band
rejections," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol.
31, 159-168, 2012.
13. Li, G., H. Zhai, T. Li, X. Y. Ma, and C.-H. Liang, Design of a
compact UWB antenna integrated with GSM/WCDMA/WLAN
bands," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 136, 409-
419, 2013.
14. Zi-Han Wu, Feng Wei, Xiao-Wei Shi, and Wen-Tao Li , A
Compact quad band-notched uwb monopole antenna loaded one
lateral l-shaped slot, Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol.
139, 303-315, 2013
15. R. Azim and M. T. Islam, Compact planar uwb antenna with band
notch characteristics for wlan and dsrc, Progress In
Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 133, 391-406, 2013.
16. Satyabrata Maiti, Abhik Gorai and Rowdra Ghatak, A CPW fed
UWB Antenna with Triple Band Notch Characteristics using
Multiple Fractal Slots, National Conference on Materials,
Devices and Circuits in Communication Technology, 2014.
Fig.10. Simulated Group delay
Fig.11. Simulated radiation pattern in E-planes & H-planes at (a) 4GHz
(b) 8GHz(c) 12GHz
(a)
(b)
(c)
2014 International Conference on Signal Propagation and Computer Technology (ICSPCT) 433