0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
12 vues3 pages
This proposed topic involves an exegetical study of Romans 3:21-26 and Romans 1:17 comparing the perspectives of N.T. Wright and John Piper on the "righteousness of God." The draft outline involves:
1) An exegetical study of the two passages to determine what "righteousness of God" means.
2) A presentation and critical analysis of Wright and Piper's differing views on righteousness in light of the exegesis.
3) A concluding assessment of which view - Wright or Piper's - is more faithful to the text based on the exegesis.
This proposed topic involves an exegetical study of Romans 3:21-26 and Romans 1:17 comparing the perspectives of N.T. Wright and John Piper on the "righteousness of God." The draft outline involves:
1) An exegetical study of the two passages to determine what "righteousness of God" means.
2) A presentation and critical analysis of Wright and Piper's differing views on righteousness in light of the exegesis.
3) A concluding assessment of which view - Wright or Piper's - is more faithful to the text based on the exegesis.
This proposed topic involves an exegetical study of Romans 3:21-26 and Romans 1:17 comparing the perspectives of N.T. Wright and John Piper on the "righteousness of God." The draft outline involves:
1) An exegetical study of the two passages to determine what "righteousness of God" means.
2) A presentation and critical analysis of Wright and Piper's differing views on righteousness in light of the exegesis.
3) A concluding assessment of which view - Wright or Piper's - is more faithful to the text based on the exegesis.
What is the 'righteousness of God' (!"#$ %&"' in Ro(ans )*)+ and
,*-).-/0 Co(1aring - 1ers1e2ti3es (o4d and ne5' as out4ined in 6 Pi1er's7 The Future of Justification and The Justification of God and 8T Wright's7 Justification. DR9:T O;T<I8E 9n e=egeti2a4 stud> of the t5o 1assages to 2o(e to a theo4ogi2a4 2on24usion as regards 5hat is the 'righteousness of God'* Then a 2riti2a4 engage(ent of the t5o 3ie5s of Wright and Pi1er in 4ight of (> o5n theo4ogi2a4 ?udge(ent gained fro( the e=egesis and a resu4ting 2on24usion of 5hi2h 3ie57 'o4d' or 'ne5'7 as e=1ressed @> the t5o (en is (ore faithfu4 to the te=t in 4ight of (> o5n 2on24usions on the 1assages* AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA BETCODO<OGD E=egesis of the t5o 1assages* Trans4ation fro( the origina4 GreeE7 engaging 5ith gra((ati2a47 te=tua4 and inter1reti3e issues as 5e44 as 2on2ordan2e 5orE on the use of 'righteousness of God'* Cistori2a4 and 4iterar> 2onte=t and genre 5ou4d feature as 1art of the e=egesis as 5e44 as engage(ent 5ith the (ain 2o((entaries on Ro(ans* 9 1resentation of @oth 5riter's 3ie5s of the righteousness of God in Ro(ans and ho5 the> differ* Criti2a4 engage(ent 5ith @oth 5riter's 3ie5s 5ith a 2on24usion of 5hi2h has the @est understanding in the 4ight of (> o5n e=egesis*
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA I8DIC9TIFE GIG<IOGR9PCD Aland, B., Aland, K., Black, M., Martini, C. M., Metzger, B. M., & Wikgren, A. 1993. The Greek New Testament (4th ed.). United Bible !cietie"# $ederal %e&'blic !( )er*an+ Arndt, W., ,anker, $. W., & Ba'er, W. -.... A Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament and other early Christian literature (3rd ed.). Uni/er"it+ !( Chicag! 0re""# Chicag! Beker, 1. C., 192.. Paul the Apostle. 3dinb'rgh# 4&4 Clark 5td. Biblical t'die" 0re"". -..6. The NET i!le "irst Edition# i!le. English. NET i!le.# The NET i!le. Biblical t'die" 0re"" Bird, M. $., -..7. The $a%ing &ighteousness of God. Milt!n Ke+ne"# 0atern!"ter Ca*&bell, ,. A., -..9. The 'eli%erance of God. )rand %a&id"#3erd*an" 0'bli"hing C!. Ca*&bell, ,. A., 199-. The &hetoric of &ighteousness in &omans (.)*-)+. he((ield# 184 0re"" Cran(ield, C. 3. B., 1992. ,n &omans and ,ther New Testament Essay. 3dinb'rgh# 4&4 Clark 5td. ,a", A. A., -..3. 0a'l and the -ews. Ma""ach'"ett"# 9endrick"!n 0'bli"her", :nc. ,a", A. A., -..7. $ol%ing the &omans 'e!ate. Minnea&!li"# $!rtre"" 0re"" ,a/ie", ;. ,., 199.. "aith and ,!edience in &omans. he((ield# 184 0re"" ,!n(ield, K. 0., 1991. The &omans 'e!ate. 3dinb'rgh# 4&4 Clark ,'*brell, W. 1., 1924. Co%enant and Creation. 5!nd!n# Baker B!!k" ,'nn, 1. ,. )., 1922. .ord i!lical Commentary/ &omans *-0. ,alla"#W!rd B!!k" $itz*a+er, 1. A., 1993. &omans. 5!nd!n# )e!((re+ Cha&*an 9a<th!rne, ). $., Martin, %. 0., & %eid, ,. ). 1993. 'ictionary of Paul and his 1etters/ ,!<ner" )rieb, A. K., -..-. The $tory of &omans. 5!'i"/ille, Kent'ck+# We"t*in"ter=1!hn Kn!> 0re"" )r!/e, :5# :nter?ar"it+ 0re"". 9a+", %. B., 1929. Echoes of $cripture in the 1etters of Paul. 5!nd!n# @ale Uni/er"it+ 0re"" 9a+", %. B., -..A. The Con%ersion of the 2magination. )rand %a&id"#3erd*an" 0'bli"hing C!. 9endrik"en, W., 192.. New testament Commentary. &omans3 *-0. 3dinb'rgh# Banner !( 4r'th 4r'"t 1e<ett, %., -..7. &omans. A Commentary. Minnea&!li"# $!rtre"" 0re"" K!ehler, 5., Ba'*gartner, W., %ichard"!n, M. 3. 1., & ta**, 1. 1. 1999. The 4e!rew and Aramaic lexicon of the ,ld Testament (electr!nic ed.). 3.1. Brill# 5eidenB ;e< @!rk Kr'"e, C. )., 1996. Paul/ the 1aw and -ustification. 5eice"ter# A&!ll!" Mc)rath, A. 3., 1926. 2ustitia 'ei/ The eginnings to the &eformation. Ca*bridge# Ca*bridge Uni/er"it+ 0re"". Mc)rath, A. 3., 1926. 2ustitia 'ei/ "rom *566 to the present day. Ca*bridge# Ca*bridge Uni/er"it+ 0re"". Mart+n, 1. 5., 1997. Theological 2ssues in the 1etters of Paul. 3dinb'rgh# 4&4 Clark 5td. M!!, ,. 1., 1996. The Epistle to the &omans. )rand %a&id"#3erd*an" 0'bli"hing C!. M!rri", 5., 1922. The Epistle to the &omans/ )rand %a&id"#3erd*an" 0'bli"hing C!. 0i&er, 1., 1993. The 7ustification of God3 an exegetical and theological study of &omans 83*-)(/ )rand %a&id"# Baker Acade*ic 0i&er, 1., -..2. The "uture of -ustification. Wheat!n, :llin!i"# Cr!""<a+ B!!k" 0!rter, . 3., & 3/an", C. A. -.... 'ictionary of New Testament !ackground3 A compendium of contemporary !i!lical scholarship (electr!nic ed.). :nter?ar"it+ 0re""# ,!<ner" )r!/e, :5 %ai"anen, 9. 1923. Paul and the 1aw. 4'bingen# $ir"t $!rtre"" 0re"" ander", 3. 0., 1923. Paul/ the 1aw and the -ewish People. 5!nd!n# CM 0re"" chlatter, A., 199A. &omans The &ighteousness of God. Ma""ach'"ett"# 9endrick"!n 0'bli"her", :nc. naith, ;. 9., 1997. The 'istincti%e 2deas of the ,ld Testament. Carli"le# 0atern!"ter 0re"" t'hl*acher, 0., 1994. Paul9s 1etter to the &omans. A Commentary. 5!'i"/ille, Kent'ck+# We"t*in"ter=1!hn Kn!> 0re"" chreiner, 4. %., 1992. &omans. )rand %a&id", Baker Acade*ic The 4oly i!le3 English standard %ersion. -..1. tandard Bible !ciet+# Wheat!n The 4oly i!le3 New American $tandard i!le 3 *885 update. 199A. 5a9abra, CA# 4he 5!ck*an $!'ndati!n The 4oly i!le3 New &e%ised $tandard :ersion. 1929. 4h!*a" ;el"!n 0'bli"her"# ;a"h/ille Theological 'ictionary of the New Testament. 1964C (). Kittel, ). W. Br!*ile+ & ). $riedrich, 3d.) (electr!nic ed.). 3erd*an"# )rand %a&id", M: Wallace, ,. B., 1999. Greek Grammar eyond the asics - Exegetical $yntax of the New Testament. D!nder/an 0'bli"hing 9!'"e and )ala>ie !(t<are Wedderb'rn, A. 1. M., 1922. The &eason for &omans. 3dinb'rgh# 4&4 Clark 5td. We"terh!l*, ., -..4. Perspecti%es ,ld and New on Paul. )rand %a&id"#3erd*an" 0'bli"hing C!. Wright, ;.4., -..9. -ustification. 5!nd!n# 0CK Wright, ;.4., -..A. Paul in "resh Perspecti%e/ 5!nd!n# 0CK Wright, ;.4., 1991. The Climax of the Co%enant3Christ and the 1aw in Pauline Theology/ 3dinb'rgh# 4&4 Clark Die"ler, 1., 1929. Paul9s 1etter to the &omans. 5!nd!n# CM 0re"" AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA T;TOR'S COBBE8TSH