Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Note
~NO.c,
0
~C_I_Py_ri_di_nc_l_!::._ _ _
( 2)
(I )
0
o=:~ ,~N~ In·
H 0 H 0
AcOHt6
~ UU
7
( 3a) R' ( 2)
o=:~
~ u
r
R'
( 6)
H~NOOCCH 1
AcOHi/:::,.
~
U ~ U+ R'
0 Br
0
( 9) (II)
~~HJO
~N'~Br _I_'y_rid_in_c_IR_T_---1•0=)--CN~
CH3 0 I.B'
( 7 h) (8b)
Scheme 1
NOTES 2117
1.5 and 0.5 hr respectively. At the end of this period, Preparation of 5 from 2/9 and 6/8 (General
the reaction mixture was cooled. and the separated procedure). A mixture of 6/8 (1 0 IT: mole). 2/9 (12 m
product was filtered, washed with ethyl acetate and mole), ammonium acetate (30m moie) and acetic acid
then dried to obtain pure 2/8 (yield of 2 is 94 % and (15 mL) was retluxed atll8° C for I hr., the reaction
that or 8 is 80% ). mixture was cooled to RT and poured into icc-cold
Spectral data of 2: IR (KBr): 3029 (s, -CH- str), water ( 100 mL). The separated solid was filtered,
1697 (vs, with a shoulder at 1709, -CO- str), 1635 (m, washed with water (2x50 111L) and dried to obtain a
-C=N- str), 1579 (w), 1486 (vs). 1469 (s) cm· 1 etc. 1H crude 5. The latter was recrystallized from methanol-
NMR (0~0): 8 4.15 (s, 2H, -CH]- ). 7.45-9.0 (complex chloroform to give pure 5 (Table II).
rn. IOH, five phenyl and five pyridyl protons) and Preparation of 1,5-diketone. Treatment of 2 ( 12
rn.p. >300" C. m mole) with 3a 1(10 m mole) (i.e. 3a. R'=OMc) in
Spectral data of 8: IR (KBr): 3136 (w, -CH str), retluxing acetic ac£d for 4 hr, gave I ,5-diketone 2"a 1
3032 (m), 1693 (vs, -CO- str), 1636 (m, -C=N-), 1594 (i.e., 2", R=H, R'=OMe-p), m.p. 167-70"C. IR (KBr):
(m). 1578 (m), 1494 (m) cm· 1 etc. 1H NMR (0]0): 8 3000 (vb, imidazole -NH-). 1688, 1686 (vs, doublet,
2.3 (s, 3H,-NCH~). 4.2 (s, 2H, -CH 2 - ), 7.0-7.3 with a shoulder at 1670, -CO- str), 1625 (vs. -C=C-,
(complex m, 9H, five pyridyl protons and four aryl str), 1591 (vs), 1490(m), 1420(s)crn· 1ctc.
protons of benzimidazole moiety) and m.p. >300" C.
Preparation of 4 from 3 (General procedure). To Acknowledgement
a solution of 3 ( 10 m mole) and ammonium acetate
(30m mole) in acetic acid (15 mL) was added solid 2 The authors are deeply indebted to U G C, New
( 12 m mole) as one lot and the mixture refluxed at Delhi, for financial support.
II8°C for I hr. Then, the reaction mixture was poured
into icc-cold water (I 00 mL) and the separated solid References
was filtered, washed with water and dried to obtain /J('Il:imida:olc and congeneric lricvclic, 'OIIIf!OIInds. edited hy
P N Preston, Part 2 . Chap.IO (Wiley lntcNc.:nce. New York).
crude 4. The latter was recrystallized from methanol-
1980. p. 531: Preston P N. Chem Rc,·. 74. 1974. 279:
chloroform to obtain pure 4 (Table 1). Grimmett M R. Comprehensil'l' heleron·c/ic chemislrr. Vol.),
Preparation of 5/6 from 4a/3a (General Chap. 4.0X. K T Potts, A R Katrizky & C W Rees. (General
procedure). A mixture of 4 (10 m mole). K]CO~ Editors) (PergarlHm Press. Oxford). 1984. -l57: Hofmann K.
(0.83 g. 6 111 mole). TEBAC (0.113 g, 0.5 m mole) lmida:ole and ils d,,rivalil'£'.1', in The c!.-eiJiislry of' hClemc\'clic
compowuls (series Editor: A Wcissherger) (Wiley
and the alkylating agent OMS I PhCH 2Cl ( 12 111 lntcrscience, New York). Part I. 1953, p. 247.
mole) in chloroform (25 mL) was stirred at RT for 2 Krishnan V S H. Chowdary K S. Duhcy P K & Vijaya S.
2.5 hr. The reaction mixture was filtered and the Indian J Ch('ln, 408, 2001, 603.
chloroform filtrate was washed with water (2x20 3 Brahmhhatt D I. Raolji G B. Pandya S U & Pandya U R.
Indian J Chem, 3X. 1999.212.
111L), dried over anhyd. MgS0 4 , filtered and
4 Duhey P K, Ramanatham J, Ramesh Kumar & Ravi Kumar C,
evaporated to dryness yielding a residue, which was Indian J Helemcvciic Chem. 9, 2000, 25-J.
crude 5/6. The latter were recrystallized to obtain 5 Vogel's Texl!Jook of' Praclical Organi<.· Chemi.11rr. (Addison-
pure 5/6 (Table II). Wesley Longman Ltd., London), 1998, 1034.