0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
9 vues4 pages
The purpose of this memorandum is to identify which, if any, European Union member states, or future member states, have constitutional provisions that permit citizens or civic groups to initiate constitutional
amendments.
Titre original
Chart on Direct Democracy Constitutional Provisions
The purpose of this memorandum is to identify which, if any, European Union member states, or future member states, have constitutional provisions that permit citizens or civic groups to initiate constitutional
amendments.
The purpose of this memorandum is to identify which, if any, European Union member states, or future member states, have constitutional provisions that permit citizens or civic groups to initiate constitutional
amendments.
The purpose of this memorandum is to identify which, if any, European Union member states, or future member states, have constitutional provisions that permit citizens or civic groups to initiate constitutional amendments.
STATE DIRECT DEMOCRACY (Constitutional Reforms) CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION 1. Austria No 2. Belgium No 3. Bulgaria No 4. Cyprus No 5. Czech Republic No 6. Denmark No 7. Estonia No 8. Finland No 9. France No 10. Germany No 11. Greece No 12. Hungary No 13. Ireland No 14. Italy No 15. Latvia No 16. Lithuania Yes Art. 147 allows a motion to supplement the Constitution to be submitted to the Seimas by voters. However, the minimum number of voters required for a submission is 300,000. 1
There are 141 members of the Seimas, who are state representatives, elected to 4-year terms. 17. Luxembourg No 18. Malta No
1 LITHUANIA CONST. art. 147 (1992), available at http://legislationline.org/documents/section/constitutions. 3 19. Netherlands No 20. Poland No 21. Portugal No 22. Romania Yes Art. 150 permits citizens to initiate the revision of the constitution if the proposal is initiated by at least 500,000 citizens with the right to vote. The Constitution further stipulates that these citizens must belong to at least half the number of the counties in the country, and requires that 20,000 signatures be garnered from each of the respective counties. 2
23. Slovakia No 24. Slovenia Yes Art. 168 permits a proposal to initiate the procedure for amending the constitution if the proposal is submitted by at least 30,000 voters. 3
25. Spain No 26. Sweden No 27. United Kingdom No 28. Croatia (Acceding Country) No 29. Turkey (EU Candidate) No 30. Iceland (EU Candidate) No 31. Montenegro (EU Candidate) No 32. Serbia (EU Candidate) Yes Art. 203 permits 150,000 voters to collectively submit a proposal to amend the constitution. 4
33. The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (EU Candidate) Yes Art. 130 permits 130,000 citizens to submit a proposal to initiate a change in the constitution. 5
2 ROMANIA CONST. art. 150 (1991), available at http://legislationline.org/documents/section/constitutions. 3 SLOVENIA CONST. art. 168 (1991), available at http://legislationline.org/documents/section/constitutions. 4 SERBIA CONST. art. 203 (2006), available at http://www.srbija.gov.rs/cinjenice_o_srbiji/ustav_odredbe.php?id=227. 5 MACEDONIA CONST. art. 130 (1991), available at http://legislationline.org/documents/section/constitutions 4 34. Switzerland (non-EU member) Yes Art. 193 provides that the public may propose a total revision of the constitution, which would be approved through a public referendum. 6
Art. 194 provides that the public may also request a partial revision of the constitution. 7 A proposal to completely overhaul or partially revise the constitution requires 100,000 eligible voters to propose the initiative for public referendum. 8
6 SWITZERLAND CONST. art. 193 (1999), available at http://legislationline.org/documents/section/constitutions. 7 SWITZERLAND CONST. art. 194 (1999), available at http://legislationline.org/documents/section/constitutions. 8 SWITZERLAND CONST. arts. 138, 139 (1999), available at http://legislationline.org/documents/section/constitutions.
It deters criminals from committing serious crimes. Common sense tells us that the most frightening thing for a human being is to lose their life; therefore, the death penalty is the best deterrent when it comes (1).pdf