The Breivik Action: The First Archeofuturist Victory

Sebastian E. Ronin, Chairman, Renaissance International

In a war there are many moments for compassion and tender action. There are many
moments for ruthless action, what is often called ruthless, but may in many cir
cumstances only be clarity, seeing clearly what there is to be done and doing it
, directly, quickly, awake, looking at it. - Kurtz
As of this date, July 27, 2011, the military action carried out by Anders Behrin
g Breivik in Norway has altered and shifted drastically the socio-political and
cultural struggle of Occidental White Europids (WE) to retake their ancestral ter
ritories, heritage and future history from Globalist-sponsored incursion, coloni
zation and possible genocide. There will be serious setbacks. There will be seri
ous blowback. There will also be considerable and, what was unimaginable opportu
nity prior to July 22, 2011, to exploit, at a sophisticated and dangerous level,
for those White Ethno Nationalists with the political imagination, courage and
resolve to do so.
As of this date, the initial burst of media coverage and all related conspiracy
theories, second-guessing, conjecture, projection, etc. circulating in cyberspac
e are superfluous and, all things considered, useless. WE are left with an event
that is now part of the political and historical fabric and discourse. The event
exists only because of the action which birthed the event. Nationalists are lef
t with fielding and dealing with the action itself, a host of both negative and
positive consequences, and a flock of political Black Swans that are busy hatchi
ng as this is being read.
As was brought into public discourse by Rahm Emanuel when he was the White House
Chief of Staff, the political maxim of Never let a good crisis go to waste, cuts
both ways. For the cut to benefit the struggle of WE activists, this will require
a certain degree of political sophistication and a clear perception of what can
be doneand what cannot be done, and should not be done. The political leadership
of global nationalist organizations and parties will be challenged to blunt an
onslaught of institutional, media and political demonization, while at the same
time probing for and implementing the opportunities that simply did not exist pr
ior to July 22, 2011.
Much of the global nationalist political leadership, especially in NAmerika, wil
l be severely challenged to make the shift to this next plateau. Some will not b
e challenged. This essay is addressed to the latter, those prepared to take the
struggle of White liberation to the next level as forced by the Breivik action w
hile simultaneously putting the goose-stepping and reactionary imposters out to
pasture once and for all.
One of the first positive consequences (as opposed to the many negative conseque
nces) that Breiviks action will generate is that it will flush out the neo-con an
d Bible-thumping political illiterates and light-weights in the NAmerikan Nation
alist community. This is already happening; it is to be welcomed. As pointed out
by my Russian colleague, Alexander Mezentsev, The Oslo massacre is a harsh blow ag
ainst all these malicious Trojan Horses, all these Geert Wilders. Via their own s
tatements to distance themselves from Breivik, this self-induced purge is alread
y underway.
Much as with the stunted NAmerikan interpretation of European National Socialism
, the NAmerikan interpretation of European New Right is a philosophical abortion
. The Breivik action opens the door for all Occidental Whites to fully explore a
nd begin to implement the political map as has been laid out by Guillaume Faye w
ith his identification of Archeofuturism.[1]
In simplest terms, Faye believes that the future of White Europids requires a tr
anscendence of the division between those who wish for a restoration of the trad
itions of the past, and those who are calling for new political, social and tech
nological forms, creating a synthesis which will amplify the strengths and restr
ain the excesses of both. (Observant readers will readily recognize the notion o
f philosophical and political Vesica Piscis, as identified by theRenaissance Van
guard International.)
Inherent in the metapolitical and general blueprint of Archeofuturism, is the sp
ecific need to uncover/re-discover/re-identify our own archaic spiritual and psy
chic motivators to fight, with both mind and fist (if and when called upon to do
so). As Faye states, this is of extreme importance because all of the foot sold
iers of our Globalist enemies, i.e. Muslim, African, Mexican, already fight with
such clarity and desperation; by never having shed these types of motivations,
the Globalist foot soldiers already inhabit the Archeofuturist world! Unless Whi
tes discover and adopt same motivators, we are at their mercy.
Within the European context, Faye states:
The problem for us Europeans is not having these values imposed upon us, on
account of our cowardliness, by Islam as is already happening but rather of bein
g capable of asserting these values ourselves by drawing them from our historica
l memory.[2]
For this reason is Breiviks action the first Archeofuturist military engagement a
nd victory. If one agrees or not with his identification of Templar Knight is besi
de the point. There are other pre-liberal/modernist, pagan-heathen identities to
choose from. What matters is that Breivik has laid claim to an Archeofuturist i
dentity and has attached a courageous political decision and action onto this id
entity. WE have been jolted and pulled into this Archeofuturist world and its pol
itical struggle. There is now no turning back. Breiviks action has, kicking and s
creaming, pushed us across our own political Rubicon. Intended or not, this is t
he genius of Breiviks action. The action is either isolated from motive or it is
related to motive, this much is self-evident. But even minus a pure and honourab
le motive, the action itself stands. If the action was engineered by a lone wolf
Breivik or by conspiratorial black operatives is secondary to the fact that it
is now in the world; that is the opportunity.
WE find ourselves now entered onto Sun Tzus Death Ground; the cultural and political
battle has been brought to us and WE have now only two options: succeed or peris
h. Rest assured, our enemies know full well what the Breivik action implies, and
a nationalist political elite is about to discover the knowing of it. WE have be
en injected into a Gramscian universe of uncharted territory, remembering that t
he map is never the territory, not even the Archeofuturist map supplied by Faye.
Rightly or wrongly, regardless of intent or non-intent, patsy or not, Mason-Zio
nist or not, regardless of possible hidden agendas and shady political affiliati
ons, the Breivik action has now framed the discourse and political trajectory of
the White Ethno Nationalist movement for years to come. Until proven otherwise
via independent research and/or the proceedings/discoveries via his trial, the o
nly evidence at hand are Breiviks own manifesto, 2083 A European Declaration of In
dependence and the accompanying video Knights Templar 2083, both released just prio
r to the action.[3]
If our enemies have placed the Breivik action into the world, then they have made
a mistake and the haunting diktat of Talleyrand rings true: It was worse than a c
rime; it was a mistake.
All nationalist armchair and keyboard revolutionaries, myself included, have bee
n put on notice and in proper place. The performance bar has been raised. The ga
untlet that has been dropped is simple: either rise to the challenge upon this A
rcheofuturist Death Ground, or cut bait towards reformist and feel-good twaddle
that will not so much as warrant a footnote upon the writing of White Europid hi
story.
WE are confronted with a swirling kaleidoscope of opinions, guesses and analyses.
It is the fog of war. However, at the center of this swirling kaleidoscope, reg
ardless of who has created it, is the bloody and archaic event itself and the pu
blished manuscript of motives and rationale for. The center of any storm is calm
, still; it does not revolve in a blur of confusion.
The route from perceived catastrophic setback to actual opportunity is merely on
e of perception. Direct positives that the Breivik action delivers within this n
ew political universe are as follows:
the mass positioning of the Islamization/colonization of Eurabia in the public
psyche; if these notions are immediately understood and/or comprehended or not
is beside the point; what matters is that, relative to the public psyche, they h
ave now been positioned (NAmerikan legal and illegal immigration is analogous)
the mass positioning of multiculturalism and so-called Cultural Marxism as sta
te-sponsored adjuncts to the latter colonization of the Occident by non-Occident
als in the public psyche; if these notions are immediately understood and/or com
prehended or not is beside the point; what matters is that, relative to the publ
ic psyche, they have now been positioned (NAmerikan situation is analogous)
via the conscious target selection of innocent young Whites (and also the futu
re generation of the Norwegian ruling Labour Party) by the Breivik action, the m
ass positioning of betrayal from the top in the public psyche, i.e. non-Occidental
immigration and multiculturalism are tools of the Globalist economic and politi
cal elites; if this notion is immediately understood and/or comprehended or not
(it will not be) is beside the point; what matters is that, relative to the publ
ic psyche, it has now been positioned (NAmerikan situation is analogous)
If the Breivik action was carried out solely by Breivik, then the action speaks
for itself. If the Breivik action was some sort of false flag or black op orches
trated by forces far beyond Breivik, then the action and its benefits are mainta
ined minus the mention of who may have engineered it. Either way, the psychologi
cal memes of the action remain the same. Either way, WE have been handed on a sil
ver platter a tactical Knight Fork of opportunity to be scrutinized, analyzed an
d acted upon.
Over the short term, possibly for as long as several years, there will most like
ly be serious blowback and sacrifice for nationalist organizations and political
parties. At the most these setbacks can be successfully countered, and at the l
east, neutralized, by a mature marshalling and coordination of the latter benefi
ts on the new political and propaganda terrain. That there will be a media onsla
ught against the White Ethno Nationalist movement goes without saying. Some domi
nant individuals and organizations will no doubt fall; others will survive. If t
he movement can regroup within two to three years, it will be doing well. It may
be prudent to remember that tactical and necessary concessions, sacrifices and
retreat do not equal surrender.
It is anticipated that the demonization of Whites and the playing on White guilt
will morph into nauseous overtures, spearheaded by all forms of corporate print
and electronic media. As such campaigns proceed innocent Whites on the receivin
g ends may well question their cognitive dissonance to the best of their abiliti
es and relative to the Breivikian memes that have been lodged in their psyches. Wh
at is this Islamization? What is this Eurabia? What is this colonization of our
homelands? What is this hidden and ulterior motive/agenda of multiculturalism? W
ho benefits from having these strangers in our homes? Are we really at war? Nati
onalist political organizations and parties need be prepared to field these ques
tions.
Lastly, and in passing, the descent towards a Post-Peak Oil world must be addres
sed for two reasons.
Firstly, save for a seven-word, toss-away comment on p. 1,222 of the Breivik Man
ifesto, there is no mention made of Peak Oil, yet this descent will run in paral
lel to an awakening global Ethno Nationalism and related consequences of politic
al devolution and nation-state fracture/secession. Energy devolution, ecological
tipping point, and Ethno Nationalism will be the three major socio-political dr
ivers of the 21st Century. The economic maxim of competition for scarce resources
is part of the racial strife that lays latent in the Occident.
Secondly, it is imperative that Peak Oilers, 95 percent of whom are White, quest
ion and preferably distance themselves from their predominantly liberal underpin
nings. This is no more evident than with the false path they are being lead down
by Michael C. Ruppert. Courageous street cop and brilliant investigative journa
list do not necessarily translate into political wisdom for this age. Agree with
it or not, like it or not, the world as identified and outlined by the Breivik
action is real; it cannot be downplayed; it cannot be swept under the carpet in
exchange for roasting weenies over campfires in the false nirvana of Post-Peak O
il humanitarianism and redundant equalities. This world must be accepted. A Coll
apseNet cash flow of $50,000 per month, no matter how many weenies it can buy, c
an not and will not deflect the racial/ethnic conflict (to what exact degree wil
l be a challenge of political statesmanship) that is part-and-parcel of a Post-P
eak Oil world.
In conclusion, the Breivik action has punched a hole into the publics wall of lim
ited perception, i.e. denial/fractured political cognitive dissonance. The White
Beast may not yet be fully awake, but at the very least it finally stirs in its
sleep that has been pushed from deep and unconscious to restless. There is now
a breach in the wall, and even though it is as limited as it is, for White activ
ists it signals a shift from cultural RaHoWa to the opening skirmish of actual R
aHoWa. WE now embark on claiming our own archaic sensibilities, an asset that up
to July 22, 2011 had been the sole possession of our enemies. The accompanying p
olitical cultural landscape has experienced a significant tremor, a rip in its f
abric, much to the advantage of these opening skirmishes and latent propaganda.
The Breivik action is now part of history. Oppressed, gagged and brutalized Whit
es worldwide, the victims and their families of the Breivik action, and the race
s that would challenge Whites for eventual survival during this century of pendi
ng technocratic cull and ecological purge have been sent a clear and brutal sign
al. It is that industrial, Globalist civilization is as fragile and as passing a
s the paper it is written upon. That all peoples have been carried to this new p
lace by possibly the limited self-goal of a delusional, religious conservative i
s neither here nor there. History will gaze and make its judgment while his acti
on and its consequences remain unhinged and isolated from such judgment.
The Death Ground of the opening phase of Archeofuturism has been breached; there
is no turning back. The boats and the cooking utensils have been smashed. WE now
spiritually, culturally and politically begin to feed and prosper upon the enem
y or eventually perish. These are the only two options. Our genocide is simply n
ot acceptable. RaHoWa has arrived with all the political wisdom and responsibili
ty that come with it. The horrible incentive to see clearly becomes tantamount.
Such is now our world as of July 22, 2011. However one may understand a God(s) o
f their choosing, may Gods speed be with us all. WE shall need it.
(Note: The opinions expressed in this essay are those of Sebastian Ernst Ronin a
s an individual. No political opinion and/or sentiment expressed herein is relat
ed to Mr. Ronins position as the Chairman of the Renaissance Vanguard Internation
al.)
[1] Guillaume Faye, Archeofuturism (European Visions of the Post-Catastrophic Ag
e), Arktos Media Ltd., 2010.
[2] Archeofuturism, p. 76: The mindset of Muslims and immigrants from the South,
as well as that of the sons of the immigrants who, in expanding and increasingly
aggressive masses, are inhabiting European cities, as well as that of the leade
rs of the emerging Muslim and modern gloss, has remained archaic: it is based on
the primacy of force, the legitimacy of conquest, exacerbated ethnic exclusivit
y, aggressive religiosity, tribalism, machismo, and a worship of leaders and hie
rarchic order.
[3] Full disclosure requires me to relay that I was one of the 5,700 people who
did receive an advance email attachment of Mr. Breiviks manifesto.