Uday Kambli 1 rpwl-40-12

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.40 OF 2012
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1826 OF 2003

Mukta Arts Ltd. ...Petitioner

v/s.
Abdul Hamid Patel & ors. ...Respondents

Mr. Aspi Chinoy, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Rui Rodrigues, Ms.Purvi

Doctor and Mr.Pradip Patil i/b India Law Alliance for the
petitioner.
Mr.N.R.Bubna for respondent No.4.
Mr.Gopal Ozadwar i/b Bhushan Mahadik for respondents Nos. 1
to 3.
Mr.D.J.Khambata, Advocate General with Ms.G.R.Shastry,
Addl.G.P. and Mr.P.G. Sawant, `B' Panel Counsel for respondent-
State.
Mr.Y.R.Mishra with Mr.A.R.Verma, Mr.Harihar Chaturvedi and
Mr.a.A.Ansari and Mr.Niraj Kumar for respondent No.13-CBI.
...
CORAM: MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. &
M.S.SONAK, J.
DATE : 23 JULY 2014
P.C.:
Mr.Khambhata, learned Advocate General states that
affidavit-in-reply to the review petition will be filed by 28 July
2014.
2. Stand over to 30 July 2014.
CHIEF JUSTICE
(M.S.SONAK, J.)
1 of 3
::: Downloaded on - 24/07/2014 13:47:25 :::
Uday Kambli 2 rpwl-40-12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO.167 OF 2014
IN
REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.40 OF 2012
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1826 OF 2003

Mukta Arts Ltd. ...Petitioner

v/s.
Abdul Hamid Patel & ors. ...Respondents

Mr. Aspi Chinoy, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Rui Rodrigues, Ms.Purvi

Doctor and Mr.Pradip Patil i/b India Law Alliance for the
applicant.
Mr.N.R.Bubna for respondent No.4.
Mr.Gopal Ozadwar i/b Bhushan Mahadik for respondents Nos. 1
to 3.
Mr.D.J.Khambata, Advocate General with Ms.G.R.Shastry,
Addl.G.P. and Mr.P.G. Sawant, `B' Panel Counsel for respondent-
State.
Mr.C.M.Lokesh i/b A.R.Bhole & Co. for respondent No.9.
Mr.Y.R.Mishra with Mr.A.R.Verma, Mr.Harihar Chaturvedi and
Mr.a.A.Ansari and Mr.Niraj Kumar for respondent No.13-CBI.
...
CORAM: MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. &
M.S.SONAK, J.
DATE : 23 JULY 2014
P.C.:
Having heard the learned counsel for review petitioner
and the learned Advocate General for State and learned counsel
for respondents Nos.1 to 4, learned counsel for respondent No.9
and learned counsel for respondent No.13 appearing before us,
we allow the chamber summons in terms of prayer clause (a) for
adding additional grounds to the review petition.
2 of 3
::: Downloaded on - 24/07/2014 13:47:25 :::
Uday Kambli 3 rpwl-40-12
2. Chamber summons, accordingly, stands disposed of.
Amendment to be carried out by Friday i.e. 25 July 2014.
CHIEF JUSTICE
(M.S.SONAK, J.)
3 of 3
::: Downloaded on - 24/07/2014 13:47:25 :::