A Proposed Model For Creep Relaxation of Soft Gaskets in Bolted Joints at Room Temperature

Ali A.
Alkelani
Basil A. Housari
Sayed A. Nassar
Fastening and Joining Research Institute,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Oakland University,
Rochester, MI 48309
A Proposed Model for Creep
Relaxation of Soft Gaskets in
Bolted Joints at Room
Temperature
A mathematical model is proposed for predicting the residual clamp load during creep
and/or relaxation in gasketed joints. An experimental procedure is developed to verify the
proposed model for predicting the gasket relaxation under a constant compression, gas-
ket creep under a constant stress, and gasket creep relaxation. To study gasket creep
relaxation, a single-bolt joint is used. The bolt is tightened to a target preload and the
clamp load decay due to gasket creep relaxation is observed over time under various
preload levels. Experimental and analytical results are presented and discussed. The
proposed model provides an accurate prediction of the residual clamp load as a function
of time, gasket material, and geometric properties of the gasket. A closed form solution is
formulated to determine the initial clamp load level necessary to provide the desired level
of a steady state residual clamp load in the joint, by taking the gasket creep relaxation
into account. DOI: 10.1115/1.2826430
Keywords: gasket creep relaxation, clamp load loss, gasketed bolted joints
Introduction
Gaskets are used to create and maintain a seal between two
separable anges. Theoretically speaking, anges should be per-
fectly at, smooth, and rigid, so they could be bolted together and
seal without the need for a gasket. However, this is rarely the case
in most applications; hence, a gasket is needed to ll the cavities
between the two anges and prevent joint leakage. A host of de-
sign and analysis challenges are associated with gasketed joints.
Among these challenges is the reaction of the gasket material to
the sealed medium, the pressure that the gasket can withstand in
the radial direction, the environmental effect on the gasket mate-
rial such as temperature and humidity, and more importantly the
change in the gasket thickness and stresses, which is usually re-
ferred to as gasket creep relaxation 1.
Although the effect of gasket creep relaxation on the clamp
load loss in bolted joints has been always recognized, the creep
relaxation of gasketed joints remains a vital research subject. In
the literature, very few papers address analytically the effect of
gasket creep relaxation. Creep analysis of bolted connections is
presented in Refs. 24, where steady creep was assumed for the
joint but the gasket creep was ignored. More recent studies 5,6
show that the gasket creep relaxation is more important than the
bolt/joint material relaxation and cannot be ignored. Kraus 7,8
proposed a model to predict the time required for the bolts to relax
from an initial stress level to a steady state level. However, the
effect of the gasket and other joint structures was not considered.
Most of the previously mentioned work focused on the bolt/joint
material relaxation and ignored the effect of gasket creep relax-
ation. Bazergui 9 and Bouzid 10 considered the effect of gas-
ket creep relaxation. Bazergui 9 showed based on experimental
data that, for most types of gaskets, a linear relationship between
displacement, due to creep, and the time could be constructed on
a semilogarithmic plot. Bouzid 10 also adopted the same proce-
dure to evaluate the relaxation in bolted anged connections. For
more accurate modeling of a gasketed bolted joint, this paper
provides a closed form equation for evaluating the gasket relax-
ation, creep, and creep relaxation in single-bolt joint. This pro-
posed model provides an accurate prediction of the residual clamp
load as a function of time, gasket material, and geometric proper-
ties of the gasket.
Mathematical Modeling of the Gasket
In this work, a mathematical model is proposed to investigate
the gasket material behavior when subjected to an external pres-
sure. The gasket material selected for this study is styrene butadi-
ene rubber. It is a low cost gasket material that offers moderate to
good performance for low pressure applications. It conforms eas-
ily to uneven ange faces. Some of the mechanical properties of
this material, according to the ASTM-D-2000, are shown in Table
1. The gasket material is considered viscoelastic. Figure 1 shows
the presented proposed model of the gasket; it consists of three
mechanical elements in series 1,11. The rst element is an elas-
tic spring with stiffness K
1
. The second element is pure viscous
dashpot with damping rate C
2
. The third element is a viscoelastic
element, which consists of an elastic spring K
2
and a dashpot C
2
connected in parallel. The gasket model in Fig. 1 can be used to
explain its load-deection characteristics. When a gasket is sub-
jected to a compressive force, the various model elements will
behave differently, as shown in Fig. 2. First, the elastic member
represented by the spring K
1
will compress by
1
and it will fully
decompress once the compressive force is removed. Second, the
viscoelastic element represented by the parallel combination of K
2
and C
2
will compress by
3
and it will recover after a period of
time if the load is removed; therefore, this element is described as
time-dependent and fully recoverable element. Third, the viscous
element represented by C
1
will also compress by
2
but when the
load is removed, it will not recover; hence, this element is de-
scribed as time-dependent and unrecoverable element. This ele-
ment accounts for the long term gasket creep relaxation.
When a gasket is loaded, its equivalent stiffness K
g
changes
with time causing the gasket compression
g
to increase and the
Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication
in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received July 20, 2006;
nal manuscript received March 1, 2007; published online January 30, 2008. Review
conducted by William Koves.
Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology FEBRUARY 2008, Vol. 130 / 011211-1 Copyright 2008 by ASME
Downloaded 19 Oct 2008 to 129.5.16.227. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
stress to decrease. The equivalent gasket thickness at time t can be
derived using the model shown in Fig. 1. For a constant compres-
sion, the force F may be expressed as follows:
F = K
1
1
= C
1
2
= K
2
3
+ C
2
3
1
where
2
and
3
are the rates of change of
2
and
3
with respect
to time.
For constant spring rates and damping coefcients, Eq. 1
yields the solution for
1
,
2
, and
3
subject to zero initial con-
ditions, as follows:
1
=
F
K
1
2a
2
=
t
C
1
F 2b
3
=
F
K
2
e
K
2
/C
2
t
F
K
2
2c
Equations 1 and 2a2c yield the total deection of the gasket
g
=
1
+
2
+
3
as follows:
g
t =
K
1
+ K
2
K
1
K
2
+
t
C
1
1
K
2
e
K
2
/C
2
t
Ft 3
An equivalent gasket stiffness K
g
=F/
g
is obtained from Eq. 3
as follows:
K
g
t =
1
K
1
+ K
2
K
1
K
2
+
t
C
1
1
K
2
e
K
2
/C
2
t
4
where the four constants K
1
, K
2
, C
1
, and C
2
are determined ex-
perimentally; a creep test is conducted in order to obtain these
constants. The gasket is rapidly compressed to a predetermined
load value; then the change in deection with time is recorded.
The stiffness of the elastic element K
1
is obtained by substituting
the force and compression values at t =0 into Eq. 3, as shown by
the following equation:
K
1
= K
g
0 =
F
g
0
5
As the time t becomes very large, the exponential term in Eq. 3
approaches zero and the equation reduces to
g
t =
K
1
+ K
2
K
1
K
2
+
t
C
1
F t 0 6
Measuring the total gasket deection
g
t at two sufciently large
times t
1
and t
2
, the two constants K
2
and C
1
are determined by
using Eq. 6 as
g
t
1
=
K
1
+ K
2
K
1
K
2
+
t
1
C
1
F t
1
0 7
g
t
2
=
K
1
+ K
2
K
1
K
2
+
t
2
C
1
F t
2
0 8
Finally, after the constants K
1
, K
2
, and C
1
have been experimen-
tally determined from Eqs. 5, 7, and 8, the fourth constant C
2
may also be determined experimentally. After a short time t
3
from
applying a known constant compression to the gasket, the gasket
deection
g
t
3
is measured; substituting the measured values
into Eq. 3 would yield the value of C
2
by using
g
t
3
=
K
1
+ K
2
K
1
K
2
+
t
3
C
1
1
K
2
e
K
2
/C
2
t
3
F 9
The values obtained for the four constants K
1
, K
2
, C
1
, and C
2
are
used in the mathematical model to evaluate the behavior of the
gasket material under different loading conditions.
Experimental Verication
In order to use the proposed mathematical model to predict the
gasket behavior, the effect of gasket stress and gasket thickness on
the gasket constants K
1
, K
2
, C
1
, and C
2
needs to be investigated.
The gasket is loaded up to three different stress levels; the con-
stants were determined from one experiment at a given gasket
stress level and used to predict the gasket behavior at the other
stress levels. To investigate the effect of gasket thickness on the
calculated constants, three different thicknesses of the same gasket
material red rubber are investigated, namely, 1/ 16 in., 1/ 8 in.,
and 3/ 16 in. For the experimental verication, creep tests are used
to evaluate the proposed gasket model.
Creep Test
In the creep test, the gasket load remains constant throughout
the test while the gasket compression thickness reduction is
monitored, as illustrated in Figs. 3 and 4. An MTS fatigue testing
machine is used to conduct the creep test. The gasket material is
cut into 33 in.
2
specimens that are placed between two steel
plates, as shown in Fig. 3. The two steel plates are centered be-
tween the two jaws of the MTS machine, and then the upper jaw
is brought down slowly until it touches the specimen. Then the
desired force is quickly applied and maintained for 40 min. Real
time data on the gasket load and displacement are collected using
a data acquisition system. Acurve like the one shown in Fig. 4 can
be obtained and used to calculate the gasket constants K
1
, K
2
, C
1
,
Table 1 Mechanical properties of styrene butadiene rubber
Polymer
Temp.
range F Hardness
Tensile
psi
Elongation
%
Red rubber 20 to +170 755 400 250
Fig. 1 Mechanical model of a typical gasket 1,11
Fig. 2 Gasket force compression 1
011211-2 / Vol. 130, FEBRUARY 2008 Transactions of the ASME
and C
2
. These constants can be used to construct the gasket creep
versus time plot using the derived equation Eq. 3 and compare
the results to the ones obtained experimentally.
Figures 57 show the analytical gasket creep predicted by Eq.
3 versus the experimental data for various gasket thicknesses.
For each thickness, three levels of initial gasket loads are used;
experimental data from one arbitrarily level is used for determin-
ing the four gasket constants and the other two levels are used to
verify the general validity of the model represented by Eq. 3;
also the same constants values are used later to predict the gasket
relaxation and gasket creep relaxation behavior. The analytical
and experimental results are in good agreement; they both show
that the stress level does not affect the gasket constants. Hence, an
arbitrary stress level that varies between 450 psi and 1000 psi is
used for determining the gasket constants for various thicknesses.
However, it was found that the gasket constants C
1
and C
2
are
signicantly affected by the gasket thickness, but there was no
clear correlation between those constants and the thickness.
Relaxation Test
In the relaxation test, the gasket is compressed and maintained
at a xed compression throughout the test, while the decreasing
gasket load is monitored in real time for 40 min. The test setup is
similar to that used in the creep test Fig. 3. However, in the
relaxation test the MTS machine is set up to apply the constant
deection. Figures 810 show the analytical and the experimental
results for the relaxation test for gasket thicknesses of 1/ 16 in.,
1/ 8 in., and 3/ 16 in., respectively. Each gure shows the gasket
relaxation behavior for three levels of initial stress. The gasket
constants obtained from the creep test for each gasket thickness
are used to predict the relaxation behavior of the gasket Eq. 3.
The analytical and experimental gasket creep results are in good
agreement. The test shows that the mathematical model presented
can be used successfully to predict the gasket relaxation behavior
as well as the creep behavior of the studied red rubber gasket.
Fig. 3 Gasket creep and relaxation test setup
Fig. 4 Typical creep curve
Fig. 5 Experimental and analytical creep results for 1/ 16 in.
thick gasket
thick gasket
thick gasket
Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology FEBRUARY 2008, Vol. 130 / 011211-3
For the various levels of applied preload, the steady state load
relaxation is increased with the increase in gasket thickness. The
steady state clamp load losses as percentages of the applied pre-
load during the relaxation test were 4%, 14%, and 21% for gasket
thicknesses of 1/ 16 in., 1/ 8 in., and 3/ 16 in., respectively. The
increased gasket relaxation due to thickness increase would
cause a similar trend in the clamp load loss and is consistent with
reported ndings in Refs. 1,12,13.
Mathematical Modeling of Gasket Creep Relaxation
The clamp load loss in a gasketed bolted joint is caused by the
creep and relaxation of the gasket material. In most cases,
threaded fasteners are used to create the required pressure on the
gasket. Usually, after tightening the bolts, the clamp load starts to
decrease. In gasketed joints, creep relaxation is the combined ef-
fect of the relaxation of the gasket material, where the load on the
gasket decreases with time, and the gasket creep that causes bolt
relaxation. Gasket creep causes the gasket to become thinner;
therefore, the bolt loses some of its elongation, which translates
into a loss in the joint clamping force. Most of the standard gasket
tests are conducted under constant force pure creep or constant
deection pure relaxation. For accurate prediction of the clamp
load loss in gasketed joints, however, the uncoupled relaxation
and creep tests do not yield a reliable prediction 14. Hence, a
new gasket model is developed to predict the clamp load loss due
to gasket creep relaxation in a single-bolt joint. The model is
shown in Fig. 11. The gasketed joint system is modeled as a set of
springs and dashpots. The bolt is presented by a spring in parallel
with the gasket and the anges. Figure 11a shows the free pre-
tightening position for the different joint members. When the
joint is tightened, Fig. 11b shows the gasket compression and
the bolt elongation. As time elapses, gasket creep relaxation takes
place causing further gasket thickness reduction as illustrated by
Fig. 11c. This additional reduction in gasket thickness from Figs.
11b and Fig. 11c is not recoverable even after the load is com-
pletely removed; permanent gasket deformation is shown in Fig.
11d.
Once the bolt is tightened, gasket creep relaxation starts. The
change in the force is the same in the gasket F
g
, the joint
members F
c
, and the bolt F
b
. This yields
F
g
= F
c
= F
b
10
Using the model shown in Fig. 11, Eq. 10 can be written as
follows:
K
g
g
t = K
b
b
11
Figure 11 shows that the change in the bolt elongation is equal to
the summation of the changes in the joint and gasket thickness;
this yields
c
+
g
=
b
12
Assuming that, for a soft gasket material, the change in the joint
thickness is too small compared to the change in the gasket com-
pression
c
g
, Eq. 12 reduces to
g

b
13
The gasket compression t at time t is still given by t
=Ft / K
g
t.
The gasket model, which has been presented earlier, can be
used to estimate the change in gasket compression and the clamp
load at any time t. The additional decrease in gasket thickness is
given by
Fig. 8 Experimental and analytical relaxation results for
1/ 16 in. thick gasket
g
t =
g
0
Ft
K
g
t
14
where
g
0 is the gasket compression at initial tightening, K
g
t is
the gasket stiffness, and Ft is the clamping force at time t.
Using Eq. 13, the clamping force Ft at time t is given by
Ft = K
b
b
t = K
b
b
0
g
t 15
where
b
0 is the initial bolt elongation right after the tightening,
which is obtained from the bolt preload F
0
and the bolt stiffness
K
b
. Substituting Eq. 14 into Eq. 15, and by manipulation the
clamping force at any time t is given as follows:
Ft =
b
0
g
0
K
b
K
g
t
K
b
K
g
t
16
Equations 4 and 16 provide a closed form solution for the
residual clamping force Ft in a single-bolt gasketed joint at any-
time t. These equations are used to construct the creep relaxation
plots for the studied red rubber gasketed joint.
The value of the initial clamp load F
0
required to maintain a
desired level of the residual clamp force F
r
, after the gasket creep
relaxation has taken place is determined from Eq. 16 as follows:
F
0
= F
r
K
g
t + K
b
K
g
0 + K
b
K
g
0
K
g
t
17
where K
g
0 and K
g
t are obtained using Eq. 4.
Experimental Verication of the Creep Relaxation
Model
Figure 12 shows the test setup used for the experimental veri-
cation of the proposed gasket creep relaxation model in a single-
bolt gasketed joint. The bolt is tightened using an electric tool at
127 rpm to minimize the amount of gasket creep relaxation that
takes place during the tightening process itself. A load cell is
inserted between the bolt and the upper plate to monitor the
clamping force during the test. After tightening, the joint is left for
40 min, during which the clamp load is recorded using a data
acquisition system.
The same gasket constants obtained from the earlier creep test
are used in the creep relaxation model. Figures 1315 show the
analytical results from the proposed creep relaxation model Eq.
16 in comparison with the experimental data, for a single-bolt
gasketed joint. Results show good correlation between the experi-
mental data and the analytical model. The slight difference of
5% between the model results and the experimental data could
be due to normal variation in the gasket mechanical properties.
Fig. 11 Mechanical model of single-bolt gasketed joint
Fig. 12 A single-bolt gasketed joint test setup
Fig. 13 Experimental and analytical creep relaxation results
for 1/ 16 in. thick gasket
Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology FEBRUARY 2008, Vol. 130 / 011211-5
Hence, the proposed mathematical model may be used to predict
the gasket creep relaxation behavior in a single-bolt gasketed
joint, provided that the gasket constants have been experimentally
determined and used in the model. The new creep relaxation
model may also be used to estimate the initial clamp load F
0
needed to produce a desired level of a steady state residual clamp
load F
r
, by taking the gasket creep relaxation into consideration
Eq. 17.
Conclusions
Gasket creep, relaxation, and creep relaxation behaviors have a
signicant effect on the residual clamping force in gasketed joints.
A mathematical model is presented to predict the gasket behavior
at room temperature, and an experimental procedure is established
to determine the necessary gasket constants for the model. The
effect of gasket stress level and the gasket thickness on the gasket
constants used in the model is investigated. The gasket constants
are found to be independent of the gasket stress level but are
affected by the gasket thickness for the gasket material considered
in this study red rubber.
A closed form solution is formulated for the clamp load as a
function of the time elapsed after the initial tightening of the joint.
The clamp load formulation has been successfully used to provide
a closed form solution that determines the initial clamp load level
that is necessary to provide the desired level of a steady state
residual clamp load in the joint, by taking the gasket creep relax-
ation into account. The good agreement between the mathematical
model results and the experimental data suggests that the pro-
posed model can be used to accurately describe the gasket behav-
ior and the clamp load loss due to gasket creep relaxation.
References
1 Czernik, D. E., 1996, Gaskets Design, Selection, and Testing, McGraw-Hill,
New York, pp. 5154, 8992.
2 Bailey, R. W., 1937, Flanged Pipe Joints for High Pressure and Tempera-
tures, Engineering London, 144, pp. 364365.
3 Martin, J., 1938, Stresses and Deformations in Pipe Flanges Subjected to
Creep at High Temperatures, J. Franklin Inst., 226, pp. 645657.
4 Waters, E. O., 1938, Analysis of Bolted Joints at High Temperatures, Trans.
ASME, 60, pp. 8386.
5 Nassar, S. A., and Alkelani, A. A., 2006, Clamp Load Loss Due to Elastic
Interaction and Gasket Creep Relaxation in Bolted Joints, ASME J. Pressure
Vessel Technol., 128, pp. 18.
6 Nassar, S. A., and Alkelani, A. A., 2006, Effect of Tightening Speed on
Clamp Load Distribution in Gasketed Joints, SAE Special Publication SP-
2033, pp. 173187.
7 Kraus, H., 1980, Creep Analysis, Wiley, New York.
8 Kraus, H., and Rosenkrans, W., 1984, Creep of Bolted Flanged Connections,
Welding Research Bulletin No 294.
9 Bazergui, A., 1984, Short Term Creep Relaxation Behavior of Gaskets,
Welding Research Council Bulletin No. 294, pp. 922.
10 Bouzid, A., and Chaaban, A., 1996, A Proposed Method for Evaluating Re-
laxation in Bolted Flanged Connections, International Conference on Pres-
sure Vessel Technology, Vol. 2, pp. 123132.
11 Ehrenstein, G. W., 2001, Polymeric Materials: Structure-Properties-
Applications, Hanser, Munich.
12 Bouzid, A., Chaaban, A., and Bazergui, A., 1995, The Effect of Gasket
Creep-Relaxation on the Leakage Tightness of Bolted Flanged Joints, ASME
J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 117, pp. 7178.
13 Nassar, S. A., and Alkelani, A. A., 2006, Clamp Load Loss Due to Elastic
Interaction and Gasket Creep Relaxation in Bolted Joints, ASME J. Pressure
Vessel Technol., 128, pp. 395401.
14 Bickford, J. H., 1995, An Introduction to the Design and Behavior of Bolted
Joints, 3rd ed., Dekker, New York.

A Proposed Model For Creep Relaxation of Soft Gaskets in Bolted Joints at Room Temperature

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

A Proposed Model For Creep Relaxation of Soft Gaskets in Bolted Joints at Room Temperature

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Ali A.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi