+ Font Size -

XFINITY Connect
KimBeem@comcast.net
Re: Incident No. 11421-10
From : KimBeem@comcast.net
Subject : Re: Incident No. 11421-10
To : Randy Thorp <rthorp@lcounty.com>
Cc : Kenneth Oswalt <koswalt@lcounty.com>, Chad Dennis
<cdennis@lcounty.com>, John Geidenberger
<JGeidenberger@lcounty.com>, Tim Tyo
<TTyo@lcounty.com>, Ashley R. Murphy
<AMurphy@lcounty.com>, Doug Sassen
<DSassen@newarkohio.net>
Wed, Apr 27, 2011 05:59 AM
What an incredibly ignorant conclusion you have drawn! I have been very clear about what solution
I want. I want those who committed crimes against me held accountable, which should be the same
solution any law enforcement professional would also want.
Be sure to rehearse Tyo, Murphy and the 2 Pataskala patrolmen well, remember, they will have to be
willing to perjure themselves if they are going to confirm the tale Murphy tells in the report.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Thorp" <rthorp@lcounty.com>
To: KimBeem@comcast.net, "Doug Sassen" <DSassen@newarkohio.net>
Cc: "Kenneth Oswalt" <koswalt@lcounty.com>, "Chad Dennis" <cdennis@lcounty.com>, "John
Geidenberger" <JGeidenberger@lcounty.com>, "Tim Tyo" <TTyo@lcounty.com>, "Ashley R.
Murphy" <AMurphy@lcounty.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 12:32:42 PM
Subject: RE: Incident No. 11421-10
Kim, clearly absolutely nothing we do relative to this incident is going to satisfy your questions or
complaints. This office, as well as others, have gone far and above what we really needed to in
order to come to an amicable solution. I believe you simply do not really want a solution.
Therefore, take what ever action it is that you deem appropriate. Our office will no longer address
this issue with you. Regards.
Sheriff Randy Thorp
Licking County Sheriff's Office
155 E. Main St.
Newark, Ohio 43055
(740) 670-5554
rthorp@lcounty.com
-----Original Message-----
From: KimBeem@comcast.net [mailto:KimBeem@comcast.net]
Page 1 of 5 XFINITY Connect
3/22/2012 http://sz0048.ev.mail.comcast.net/zimbra/h/printmessage?id=317763&tz=America/Chicag...
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 6:02 AM
To: Doug Sassen
Cc: Oswalt, Kenneth; Thorp, Randy; Dennis, Chad; Geidenberger, John; Tyo, Tim; Murphy,
Ashley R.
Subject: Re: Incident No. 11421-10
Sorry I was unable to finish this yesterday but I was at work, doing my job, which I know is a
foreign concept to the recipients. In addition to Beth and Sierra, you didn't address Timothy
Tyo. He was present, he is the one I spoke with, not Murphy, and when Beth and Kay (Alyson
- sorry, if she get to use Kay on Mom's headstone because Dad claims you have to use legal
names when her name is actually Alyson Kay, then she can be Kay here too.......and they have
him so confused that he says her name is Kay Alyson) came up to where I was talking with the
police, Kay spoke directly to Tyo when she admitted having the club - claiming she needed
protection because of the difference in size. If she was concerned, maybe she, Beth, and
Sierra should have kept their sorry backsides at home if they were concerned rather than
laying in wait to create an incident, bringing a club and having the sheriff's phone number in
her cell.
Bottom line, you did nothing to investigate this. You didn't look at the phone records that
prove it couldn't have happened as they say, the countless emails, especially from the county
victim advocate who spoke of Lt. Geidenberger being so sorry that the deputies had done this
to me, the proof that Murphy couldn't have had the discussions she claimed she had, the
discrepancies between what Kay told the dispatcher and what she told in the report, and my
favorite - the report itself that has me swinging a club at Dad at the residence, while I was
demanding to see him (if I couldn't see him, how was I swinging a club at him) and then while
I was swinging a club at him I drove thru the fields to find him. I never had a club, Kay did
which she told Tyo, and Kay wasn't at the house when I arrived - the phone records and calls I
made will prove that but like the sheriff's office, you aren't interested in physical evidence.
Oswalt claimed there was a witness - if he means any of the 3 who ambushed me, swung
clubs at me, or keyed my car, I don't think they are actually witnesses.
You had no reason to take this position when there is proof otherwise so I can only guess you,
too, are participating in this obstruction of justice and have questionable integrity.
----- Original Message -----
From: KimBeem@comcast.net
To: "LAW-Douglas Sassen" <DSassen@newarkohio.net>
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 1:40:31 PM
Subject: Re: Incident No. 11421-10
Mr. Sassen:
That's not what Thorp said on the recording. He said it would be reviewed for possible
charges against Alyson.
Any and all persons? I don't think so. The dispatcher's recording proves that Beth E. Johnson,
alias Beth Beem,and Sierra Johnson were present - I have told the police that Beth swung the
club at me and Sierra screamed at me (plus keyed my car) keeping me from leaving the field
while Alyson went to the house where she had misdirected the police. Remember, in the call
to the dispatcher, the dispatcher is a sheriff's office employee, Alyson alleges I was threatening
Page 2 of 5 XFINITY Connect
3/22/2012 http://sz0048.ev.mail.comcast.net/zimbra/h/printmessage?id=317763&tz=America/Chicag...
her sister too. When the police arrived, Alyson was the only one at the house. Aren't you
remotely curious where this poor threatened sister was - 6 minutes later? Someone is doing a
very nice job of keeping precious Beth out of this when she was the one who was violent -
she's been held by the police before for domestic violence.
I won't keep you, I'm sure there is a good ole boys meeting you probably need to attend.
----- Original Message -----
From: "LAW-Douglas Sassen" <DSassen@newarkohio.net>
To: KimBeem@comcast.net
Cc: ttyo@lcounty.com, "amurphy" <amurphy@lcounty.com>, "rthorp" <rthorp@lcounty.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 1:24:38 PM
Subject: RE: Incident No. 11421-10
Ms. Beem:
Please be advised that no person or department asked that this office consider any specific
charges against any specific person. Instead, I reviewed the file with purpose to consider the
full range of potential charges against any and all involved parties as the circumstances may
have presented, which is standard operating procedure when presented with any incident
report from the Licking County Sheriffs Office or other law enforcement agency serviced by
this office. Please know that I have not discussed this matter directly or indirectly with anyone
other than the attorneys here in my office. Again, the memorandum previously delivered is
self-explanatory and this office considers the matter closed.
DOUGLAS E. SASSEN
Director of Law
40 West Main Street
Newark, Ohio 43055
740-670-7880
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This e-mail is intended by the Office of the Director of Law for use only by the individual or entity to
which it was addressed. This message may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. It
is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, anyone other than the named addressee (or a person
authorized to receive and deliver it to the named addressee). If you have received this transmission in
error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the
error by reply e-mail.
From: KimBeem@comcast.net [mailto:KimBeem@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 2:09 PM
To: LAW-Douglas Sassen
Cc: ttyo@lcounty.com; amurphy; rthorp
Subject: Re: Incident No. 11421-10
In consideration of no response, I will have to use the reasonable person approach.
A reasonable person could draw one of two conclusions: 1) After the conference call with
Thorp and Oswalt, when Thorp agreed to request consideration of charges against Alyson, she
(or her representative) was contacted to give so she could ask for consideration of charges
against me, which would explain the initiation of the mail fraud that began the following Monday
Page 3 of 5 XFINITY Connect
3/22/2012 http://sz0048.ev.mail.comcast.net/zimbra/h/printmessage?id=317763&tz=America/Chicag...
also noting that I was given no warning about the horrific allegations she made in the report nor
were they even alleged in my presence on the date of the incident. Actually, my first two
requests through the sheriff's website were ignored but I wasn't concerned because I assumed
it would state the facts that she admitted to having the club and certainly none of the fairy tales
it contained, or 2) someone at the sheriff's office decided to retaliate - I am so glad I recorded
that conference call and requested permission to record.
Either scenario is very ugly and won't bode well in a court of law. If there is a different
explanation, please feel free to offer it being cautious not to dig the hole any deeper.
----- Original Message -----
From: KimBeem@comcast.net
To: "LAW-Douglas Sassen" <DSassen@newarkohio.net>
Cc: ttyo@lcounty.com, "amurphy" <amurphy@lcounty.com>, "rthorp" <rthorp@lcounty.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 9:23:05 AM
Subject: Re: Incident No. 11421-10
Curious that when I request charges be filed, all of the sudden you document a request for
charges against me. Who requested that?
Apparently you didn't review the report vs. the call to the dispatcher which proves Alyson's lies.
I will proceed with civil action as well as a complaint to federal authorities.
Thank You!
----- Original Message -----
From: "LAW-Douglas Sassen" <DSassen@newarkohio.net>
To: KimBeem@comcast.net
Cc: ttyo@lcounty.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 9:01:41 AM
Subject: Incident No. 11421-10
Please find attached a Memorandum addressing the request for charges in the above-
referenced matter. For the reasons explained therein, no charges are being filed by this office
as a result of this incident and this office considers the matter closed. A hard copy of this
Memorandum and the documents previously forwarded to this office will forward by Inter-
Office communication.
DOUGLAS E. SASSEN
Director of Law
40 West Main Street
Newark, Ohio 43055
740-670-7880
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This e-mail is intended by the Office of the Director of Law for use only by the individual or entity to
which it was addressed. This message may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. It
is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, anyone other than the named addressee (or a person
authorized to receive and deliver it to the named addressee). If you have received this transmission in
error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the
error by reply e-mail.
Page 4 of 5 XFINITY Connect
3/22/2012 http://sz0048.ev.mail.comcast.net/zimbra/h/printmessage?id=317763&tz=America/Chicag...
Page 5 of 5 XFINITY Connect
3/22/2012 http://sz0048.ev.mail.comcast.net/zimbra/h/printmessage?id=317763&tz=America/Chicag...