Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
S
L
D
(
m
)
1
5
0
2
0
0
2
5
0
3
0
0
2
5
0
3
0
0
3
5
0
4
0
0
3
5
0
4
0
0
4
5
0
5
0
0
4
5
0
5
0
0
N
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
i
s
l
a
n
d
s
2
0
2
3
2
5
2
7
2
5
2
7
3
2
3
7
3
2
3
7
3
9
4
3
3
9
4
3
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
y
e
x
p
o
s
e
d
a
T
h
e
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
f
t
h
i
s
t
a
b
l
e
a
r
e
s
h
o
w
n
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
a
l
l
y
i
n
F
i
g
u
r
e
5
.
R
o
w
o
n
e
i
s
d
i
v
i
d
e
d
i
n
t
o
u
p
p
e
r
a
n
d
l
o
w
e
r
h
a
l
v
e
s
:
T
h
e
u
p
p
e
r
h
a
l
f
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s
a
r
a
n
g
e
o
f
p
r
o
-
p
o
s
e
d
r
a
t
e
s
o
f
S
U
B
(
c
e
n
t
i
m
e
t
e
r
s
p
e
r
y
e
a
r
)
f
o
r
t
h
e
2
0
,
0
0
0
y
e
a
r
p
e
r
i
o
d
s
i
n
c
e
t
h
e
l
a
s
t
g
l
a
c
i
a
l
m
a
x
i
m
u
m
(
L
G
M
)
;
t
h
e
b
o
t
t
o
m
h
a
l
f
i
s
t
h
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
o
f
t
h
e
u
p
p
e
r
h
a
l
f
(
c
m
/
y
e
a
r
2
0
,
0
0
0
y
e
a
r
s
)
a
n
d
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
s
t
h
e
r
e
l
a
t
i
v
e
h
e
i
g
h
t
a
d
j
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
i
n
m
e
t
e
r
s
o
f
a
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
i
s
l
a
n
d
d
u
e
t
o
S
U
B
s
i
n
c
e
t
h
e
L
G
M
(
S
U
B
i
n
F
i
g
u
r
e
5
)
.
R
o
w
t
w
o
,
S
L
D
a
t
t
h
e
L
G
M
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
r
a
n
g
e
o
f
S
L
D
v
a
l
u
e
s
i
n
m
e
t
e
r
s
b
e
l
o
w
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
s
e
a
l
e
v
e
l
(
S
L
D
i
n
F
i
g
u
r
e
5
)
.
R
o
w
t
h
r
e
e
i
s
t
h
e
s
u
m
(
i
n
m
e
t
e
r
s
)
o
f
t
h
e
l
o
w
e
r
h
a
l
f
o
f
r
o
w
o
n
e
(
S
U
B
s
i
n
c
e
t
h
e
L
G
M
)
a
n
d
r
o
w
t
w
o
(
S
L
D
a
t
t
h
e
L
G
M
)
a
n
d
i
s
t
h
e
n
u
m
b
e
r
f
r
o
m
w
h
i
c
h
a
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
i
s
l
a
n
d
s
m
i
n
i
m
u
m
d
e
p
t
h
b
e
l
o
w
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
s
e
a
l
e
v
e
l
(
M
I
N
f
r
o
m
T
a
b
l
e
I
I
I
a
n
d
F
i
g
u
r
e
5
)
i
s
s
u
b
t
r
a
c
t
e
d
t
o
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
t
h
e
i
s
l
a
n
d
r
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
i
p
t
o
s
e
a
l
e
v
e
l
a
t
t
h
e
L
G
M
(
E
L
V
i
n
F
i
g
u
r
e
5
;
i
f
E
L
V
i
s
a
p
o
s
i
t
i
v
e
v
a
l
u
e
,
t
h
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
i
s
l
a
n
d
r
o
s
e
a
b
o
v
e
s
e
a
l
e
v
e
l
a
t
t
h
e
L
G
M
;
i
f
E
L
V
i
s
a
n
e
g
a
t
i
v
e
v
a
l
u
e
,
t
h
e
i
s
l
a
n
d
w
a
s
n
o
t
e
x
p
o
s
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
L
G
M
)
.
T
h
e
b
o
t
-
t
o
m
r
o
w
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s
h
o
w
m
a
n
y
o
f
t
h
e
4
3
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
i
s
l
a
n
d
s
l
i
s
t
e
d
i
n
T
a
b
l
e
I
I
I
c
o
u
l
d
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
e
x
p
o
s
e
d
b
y
e
a
c
h
c
o
m
b
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
S
U
B
a
n
d
S
L
D
a
s
t
o
t
a
l
e
d
i
n
r
o
w
t
h
r
e
e
(
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
i
r
M
I
N
)
.
S
e
e
t
h
e
e
x
a
m
p
l
e
i
n
t
h
e
t
e
x
t
u
n
d
e
r
D
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
f
o
r
m
o
r
e
d
e
t
a
i
l
.
SUB SLDMIN ELV
where ELV (see Figure 5) represents the actual height or depth of a potential island
above (if ELV is a positive value) or below (if ELV is a negative value) sea level at the
LGM. Perusing Table III reveals that 20 potential islands have a MIN less than 150 m
and, therefore, could have been exposed at the LGM under the prescribed condi-
tions (bottom row in Table IV). To exemplify further, this combination of values
would have resulted in potential island number 10 (from Table III, MIN 96 mbsl)
protruding some 54 m above sea level at the LGM (100 m SUB50 m SLD 96 m MIN
54 m ELV); potential island number 36 conversely (from Table III, MIN 163
mbsl) would not have been exposed because it lies more than 150 m below current
sea level (100 m SUB 50 m SLD163 m MIN 13 m ELV).
Besides providing additional landfall for seafarers, another presumed byproduct
of an exposed island chain in the eastern South Pacific would have been modifica-
tion of regional sea surface currentspossibly more favorably for eastward sailing
(Wyatt, 2002). While it is unclear what the actual extent of such an alteration could
have been, Figure 6 illustrates one speculative example and describes how an east-
ward flowing current may have been produced. Simulating the proposed archipel-
ago configuration and surface current flow on a stream table or by computer mod-
eling might provide greater insight into this part of the theory.
GEOARCHAEOLOGY: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
ANCIENT TRANSPACIFIC VOYAGING TO THE NEW WORLD
525
Figure 5. Graphic representation of elements discussed in Table IV. LGM last glacial maximum; SLD
sea level drop at the LGM in meters below current sea level; SUB subsidence of a potential island
in meters since the LGM; MIN minimum depth in meters below current sea level of each potential island
listed in Table III; and ELV the elevation of a potential island in meters above (a positive value) or below
(a negative value) sea level at the LGM as calculated using the equation: SUB SLD MIN ELV.
CONCLUSIONS
Although presently it cannot be demonstrated conclusively that mariners disem-
barked on the shores of America late in the Pleistocene, it is evident that the sea may
not have presented an insurmountable barrier to their doing so (Wyatt, 2002). Clearly,
the data presented here suggest that a now-submerged island chain in the eastern South
Pacific Ocean could have been exposed during glacially-induced sea level lowering in
combination with a moderate rate of volcanic subsidence and erosion (Wyatt, 2002). It
should be noted, too, that, though the temporal period of the LGM was chosen here to
model the hypothesis, glaciers, and consequently sea level, waxed and waned through-
out the 80,000 or so years of the Wisconsin Glacial Stage of the late Pleistocene (Meltzer,
1995). Hence, the proposed island chain and its attendant conditions and possible ben-
efits to seafarers may have appeared and disappeared correspondingly.
WYATT
VOL. 19, NO. 6 526
Figure 6. Speculative illustration of sea surface current modifications resulting from a chain of islands
exposed by Pleistocene sea level lowering as suggested by this research. In this conjectural example, the
northward flowing Peru Current (e) is split by the hypothetical chain; its western arm (g) is deflected west-
ward along the southern periphery of the chain until intercepting an existing southward flowing sub-
current (h) in the mid South Pacific gyre. The northern portion of the subcurrent (h) likewise is split by
the hypothetical island chain; its eastern arm (i) is deflected eastward along the northern periphery of the
chain until rejoining the Peru Current (e).
Whenever it may have emerged, a string of islands could have provided both
facilitating layover points for eastbound seafaring explorers and favorable current
modifications. These factors, combined with seasonably variable and anomalous
wind and current shifts, imply that sailing to America from the Old World during
the late Pleistocene may have been quite feasible if the technology existed (Wyatt,
2002). In this regard, though there is no direct evidence, the early settlement of
Australia (ca. 60,000 yr B.P.) and other western South Pacific islands suggests
that watercraft of some sort had been discovered well before the LGM. If so, it
seems illogical to conclude that humans living in a maritime environment would
not have continued to improve, refine, and exploit this valuable tool over the
ensuing millennia.
Even so, the lack of late Pleistocene-aged archaeological sites in Polynesia is wor-
risome if this hypothesis is to have any merit. Some argue that this deficiency is sim-
ply a function of the infant state of Polynesian archaeology (Terrell, 1998), while
others are confident that earlier sites are unlikely to be found (Kirch, 2002). Past
archaeological missteps, however, suggest it would be prudent not to become too
complacent or secure in any particular conviction. If latent islands do exist in the east-
ern third of the South Pacific, as proposed here, others may also exist in the west-
ern two-thirds. Conceivably it could be on those hypothetical islands or on the now
inundated shorelines of existing islands that the most ancient evidence of Polynesian
settlement will eventually be found. Only additional archaeological research can
resolve this issue.
Accordingly, proving any aspect of the subject hypothesis requires accomplishing
at least three important geological and archaeological tasks. First, the potential
islands identified here must be physically located/mapped and their actual depths
below sea level determined by more direct means. Second, if they are found to exist,
they must be physically inspected for evidence of a past terrestrial existence. And
third, to verify that humans ever landed on their shores, human artifacts or other
archaeological evidence must be found on them. In addition, to show that the islands
may have also been part of a larger migratory scheme, corroborating archaeological
evidence must be found in adjacent areas both in the Americas and in Oceania. Only
after these criteria have been satisfied, at a minimum, will ancient transpacific voy-
aging to America by island-hopping be anything more than a chimera.
Be that as it may, Figure 7 illustrates a comparison between the hypothesized
island chain suggested here and the approximate location of Paleoindian archaeo-
logical sites located to date along South Americas coast. Perhaps it is only coinci-
dental that there appears to be a large concentration of sites near the eastern terminus
of the proposed island pathway, where it might be expected that seafaring colonists
following that route could have first come ashorebut then again, perhaps it is not.
I am most grateful to Leland Bement, Patricia Gilman, and Douglas Elmore of the University of Oklahoma,
Norman, for their assistance in preparing the original thesis from which this paper was derived. In its pres-
ent form, I am particularly indebted to Leland Bement, Mary Wyatt, the reviewers for Geoarchaeology:
An International Journal, and David Hurt for his expert assistance with the illustrations. Any errors or
misrepresentations, however, are my responsibility alone.
GEOARCHAEOLOGY: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
ANCIENT TRANSPACIFIC VOYAGING TO THE NEW WORLD
527
REFERENCES
Bellwood, P. (1997). Ancient seafarers. Archaeology, 50, 2022.
Bonnichsen, R. (2001). The first Americans: Were they Australians? Mammoth Trumpet, 16, 46.
Conniff, R. (1993). Easter Island unveiled. National Geographic, 183, 5478.
Diaz, H., & Markgraf, V. (1992). El Nio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dillehay, T. (1997). Monte Verde: A late Pleistocene settlement in Chile (Volume 2). Washington, DC:
Smithsonian Institution Press.
Dixon, E. (1993). Quest for the origins of the first Americans. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico
Press.
Dixon, E. (1999). Bones, boats, & bison. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
Dixon, E. (2000). Coastal navigators: The first Americans may have come by water. Scientific American
Discovering Archaeology, 7, www.discoveringarchaeology.com.
Dorfman, A. (2000). New ways to the New World. Time, 155, 15.
Fedje, D., & Christensen, T. (1999). Modeling Paleoshorelines and locating Early Holocene coastal sites
in Haida Gwaii. American Antiquity, 64, 635652.
Finney, B. (1999). Voyaging and isolation in Rapa Nui prehistory. Pacific Exchange Information,
www.hokulea.net.
Finney, B. (2000). Closing the triangle. Pacific Exchange Information, www.hokulea.net.
Garrison, T. (1993). Oceanography: An invitation to marine science. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
WYATT
VOL. 19, NO. 6 528
Figure 7. Approximate location of existing and potential Pleistocene islands in the eastern South Pacific
Ocean in relation to known paleoindian archaeological sites (approximate location) along a portion of
the west coast of South America.
Gruhn, R. (2000). The South American twist. Scientific AmericanDiscovering Archaeology, 7,
www.discoveringarchaeology.com.
Hall, D., Ed. (1996). Simple tools, hearth found beneath Clovis horizon. Mammoth Trumpet, 11, 1417.
Hall, D., Ed. (2000). The North Atlantic hypothesis. Mammoth Trumpet, 15, 17.
Heusser, L.E., & Sirocko, F. (1996). Millennial pulsing of environmental change in southern California
from the past 24 ky: A record of Indo-Pacific ENSO events? Geology, 25, 243247.
Irwin, G., Bickler, S., & Quirke, P. (1990). Voyaging by canoe and computer: Experiments in the settlement
of the Pacific Ocean. Antiquity, 64, 3450.
Keefer, D.K., deFrance, S.D., Mosely, M.E., Richardson, J.B., III, Satterlee, D.R., & Day-Lewis, A. (1998).
Early maritime economy and El Nio events at Quebrada Tacahuay, Peru. Science, 281, 18331835.
Kirch, P.V. (2002). On the road of the wind: An archaeological history of the Pacific Islands before European
contact. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Masters, P., & Flemming, N., Eds. (1983). Quaternary coastlines and marine archaeology: Towards the
prehistory of land bridges and continental shelves. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Meltzer, D. (1995). Search for the first Americans. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Meltzer, D., Grayson, D., Ardila, G., Barker, A., Dincauze, D., Haynes, C., Mena, F., Nez, L., & Stanford,
D. (1997). On the Pleistocene antiquity of Monte Verde, southern Chile. American Antiquity, 62, 659664.
Morwood, M., OSullivan, P., Aziz, F., & Raza, A. (1998). Fission-track ages of stone tools and fossils on
the East Indonesian Island of Flores. Nature, 392, 173176.
National Geophysical Data Center (1988). ETOPO-5 bathymetric/topographic data. Data Announcement
88-MGG-02. Boulder, CO: National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration.
Nemecek, S. (2000). Who were the first Americans? Scientific American, 283, 8088.
OLenic, E. A. (1994). Climate and weather: The ENSO Connection. National Forum, 79, 4045.
Powledge, T., & Rose, M. (1996). The great DNA hunt, Part II: Colonizing the Americas. Archaeology, 49,
5868.
Sandweiss, D.H., Richardson, J.B., III, Reitz, E.J., Rollins, H.B., & Maasch, K.A. (1996). Geoarchaeological
evidence from Peru for a 5000 years B.P. onset of El Nio. Science, 273, 15311534.
Sandweiss, D.H., Maasch, K.A., & Anderson, D.G. (1999). Transitions in the mid-Holocene. Science, 283,
499.
Smith, W., & Sandwell, D. (1997a). Measured and estimated sea floor topography. Boulder, CO: World
Data Center for Marine Geology and Geophysics.
Smith, W., & Sandwell, D. (1997b). Global sea floor topography from satellite altimetry and ship depth
soundings. Science, 277, 19571962.
Terrell, J. (1998). The prehistoric Pacific. Archaeology, 51, 5663.
Weiner, J. (1994). The beak of the finch. New York: Vintage Books.
Wells, L., Hillaire-Marcel, C., Wells, L.E., Noller, J.S., Sandweiss, D.H., Richardson, J.B., III, Reitz, E.J.,
Rollins, H.B., & Maasch, K.A. (1996). Determining the early history of El Nio. Science, 276, 965968.
Wyatt, S. (2002). The feasibility of mariners crossing the South Pacific Ocean to colonize the New World
during the late Pleistocene. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Oklahoma, Norman.
Yesner, D. (1980). Maritime hunter-gatherers: Ecology and prehistory. Current Anthropology, 21, 727750.
Received February 1, 2003
Accepted for publication July 7, 2003
GEOARCHAEOLOGY: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
ANCIENT TRANSPACIFIC VOYAGING TO THE NEW WORLD
529