0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
8 vues9 pages
This document was uploaded via RecordTrac in response to a public records request for the City of Oakland. You can view the original request here: http://records.oaklandnet.com/request/5301
This document was uploaded via RecordTrac in response to a public records request for the City of Oakland. You can view the original request here: http://records.oaklandnet.com/request/5301
This document was uploaded via RecordTrac in response to a public records request for the City of Oakland. You can view the original request here: http://records.oaklandnet.com/request/5301
INTRODUCED BY COUNCILMEMBER (I CfTYATTORNEY( , f ^ ORDINANCE No. 11 589 A c. M. S. CORRECTED COPY Nov. 5, 1991 JMG: cnih AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE IMPOSING A MORATORIUM ON RESIDENTIAL RENT INCREASES FOR NINETY DAYS IN OAKLAND COMMENCING OCTOBER 20, 1991 WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 68441 C.M.S. of the City of Oakland, adopted October 20, 1991, the City Council proclaimed the existence of a local emergency throughout the City of Oakland; and WHEREAS, the City Council in declaring the existence of the local emergency made findings as stated in Resolution No. 68441 that conditions of extreme peril to the health, safety, and welfare of persons and property have arisen within the City caused by an uncontrollable six alarm fire in the Oakland Hills, which commenced on or about 11:00 a.m. on the 20th of October, 1991, and that these conditions of extreme peril necessitated the proclamation of the existence of a local emergency; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 65452 adopted October 22, 1991, the City Council found that the conditions of extreme peril to the health, safety, and welfare of persons and property continue to exist; and proclaimed that a local emergency continues to exist throughout Oakland and shall be deemed to continue to exist until its termination is proclaimed by the City Council; and WHEREAS, as a result of the fire in the Oakland Hills on October 20, 1991, approximately 2500 living units were destroyed and an estimated 5,000 people were displaced from their homes; and WHEREAS, the persons displaced by the fire are in need immediately of housing and have increased significantly the demand for single family dwellings available for rent; and WHEREAS, the vacancy rate of residential rental units is approximately 5% in the City of Oakland; and WHEREAS, the supply of affordable single family dwellings available for rent is insufficient to meet the demands in Oakland of persons displaced by the fire; and 600-245-005 (7/83) WHEREAS, due to the dramatic increase in the demand for single family dwellings which can be rented by persons displaced by the fire, reports have been received that rents have been, or soon will be, increased sharply; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 9980 C.M.S., as amended, established a Residential Rent Arbitration Board in Oakland and sets forth guidelines for rental increases, but does not control rent in the event of a voluntary vacancy nor does it control the rent of rental units in buildings built on or after January 1, 1983, or in substantially rehabilitated buildings; and WHEREAS, the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, the guidelines prescribed by the Secretary for Resources, and the provisions of the Statement of Objectives Criteria and Procedures for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act: City of Oakland, as amended, have been satisfied, and that in accordance with Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment, and therefore the project is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, The City Council hereby finds and declares that this rent increase moratorium and the limitations set forth in Sections 4 and 5 of this Ordinance will allow land owners a fair return on their investment; and WHEREAS, the City Counci 1 does herein find that the immediate control of residential rent for single family dwellings is necessary to protect and preserve the public health, welfare and safety by assisting in providing affordable housing to persons displaced by the fire; WHEREAS, this rent increase moratorium shall apply only to single family dwellings? now, therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLAND DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION l. MORATORIUM. Notwithstanding Ordinance No. 9980 C.M.S., passed on October 7, 1980, and last amended on October 28, 1986, hereinafter referred to as the Residential Rent Arbitration Ordinance, a moratorium is hereby imposed on rent increases of rental units in the City of Oakland for ninety (90) days commencing on October 20, 1991. SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be effective immediately and shall apply retroactively to October 20, 1991, which is the commencement date of the ninety (90) day moratorium. SECTION 3. DEFINITIONS. For purposes of this Ordinance the following definitions shall apply: A. BOARD: The Residential Rent Arbitration Board established by the Residential Rent Arbitration Ordinance. B. HEARING OFFICER; Person(s) designated by the City Manager to render initial decisions in all rent arbitration disputes pursuant to the Residential Rent Arbitration Ordinance or in disputes pursuant to this Ordinance. C. LANDLORD: Any owner or lessor of real property or any other person or entity who receives or is entitled to receive rent for the use or occupancy of any rental unit in the City of Oakland and the representative, agent, or successor or such person, persons, or entity. D. RENT: The total consideration demanded or received by a landlord in exchange for the use or occupancy of a rental unit. E. RENTAL UNIT: Any residential unit, and all housing services provided with such unit that is located in the City of Oakland and used or occupied by the payment of rent; provided, however, that the following dwelling units are not deemed rental units for purposes of this Ordinance: (1) Dwelling units whose rents are controlled or regulated by any government unit, agency or authority; (2) Housing accommodations in any hospital, convent, monastery, extended care facility, convalescent home for the aged, or dormitory owned and operated by an educational institution; (3) Accommodations in motels, hotels, inns, tourist houses, rooming houses, and boarding houses; provided that such accommodations are not occupied by the same tenant for 30 or more continuous days; (4) Dwelling units in a non-profit cooperative, owned, occupied, and controlled by a majority of the residents. (5) Multi family dwellings which shall include, but not be limited to, apartments or secondary units of single family dwellings. F. SECRETARY TO THE BOARD: The staff person whose position was established by the Residential Rent Arbitration Ordinance. G. TENANT: A person entitled, by written or oral agreement, to the use or occupancy of any resident unit. To the extent that they are not inconsistent with this Ordinance, the definitions used in the Residential Rent Arbitration Ordinance shall apply to this Ordinance. SECTION 4. GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINATION OF RENT. Except as provided in Section 5 herein, a rent increase in violation of the moratorium established herein shall have occurred if rent in excess of any of the following is charged for any rental unit during the moratorium: A. The rent in effect on October 20, 1991 of any occupied rental unit. B. The rent established, requested, advertized, or listed for a vacant rental unit as of October 19, 1991. C. The rent charged to the previous tenant plus 12% for rental units vacant on October 20, 1991, for which the rent had not been established, requested, advertized, or listed and which had been rented within the past year. D. For any rental units to which the circumstances defined in Section 4 a - c of this Ordinance do not apply, the fair market value of the rent of such units as of October 19, 1991. SECTION 5. STANDARDS FOR EXCEPTIONS TO RENT LIMITATIONS. Any rent which is charged during the moratorium in excess of the limitations on rent as defined in Section 4 of this Ordinance and which is under dispute must be justified on one or more of the following grounds: A. Capital improvement costs; B. Uninsured repair costs; C. Increase in housing service costs; D. Past history of rent increases; E. Debt service costs; F. Landlord had been approved by the Hearing Officer or the Board pursuant to the Residential Rent Arbitration Ordinance prior to October 20, 1991 to increase the rent; G. Any other factors the Hearing Officer and Board deem relevant. To the extent that they are not inconsistent with this Ordinance, the Residential Rent Arbitration Board Rules and Procedures, as approved by Oakland City Council Resolution No. 63429 C.M.S., shall apply to this Ordinance, SECTION 6. EFFECT ON THE RESIDENTIAL RENT ARBITRATION ORDINANCE. Except as otherwise stated herein, the Residential Rent Arbitration Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. For any disputes pursuant to the Residential Rent Arbitration Ordinance which are pending as of the effective date of this Ordinance and are determined by the Hearing Officer and/or Board to entitle the Landlord to a rent increase, such increase shall be allowed during the moratorium to the extent that it is consistent with the limitations and standards set forth in Section 4 and 5 of this Ordinance. Any increase in rent that is not permissible during the moratorium, but which otherwise would be legal pursuant to the Residential Rent Arbitration Ordinance, may be imposed at the end of the moratorium, but shall not be retroactive. SECTION 7. NOTICE. In addition to the notice requirements of Section 5, subdivision d, of the Residential Rent Arbitration Ordinance, landlords are hereby required to notify tenants in writing of this Ordinance. SECTION 8. HEARING PROCESS FOR DISPUTES. A. PETITION; The Hearing Officer shall hear matters to determine whether the rent for a rental unit complies with the provisions of Section 4 and 5 of this Ordinance upon receipt of a petition for review submitted by a tenant, a person seeking to become a tenant, i.e., a prospective tenant, or a landlord. The petition must be made under penalty of perjury and allege that a dispute has arisen concerning whether the rent for the rental unit exceeds the limitations authorized by this Ordinance. The petition must be filed with the Secretary to the Board not later than five (5) calendar days of the tenant's or prospective tenant's determination that a violation of this Ordinance has occurred; or in the case of a landlord's petition, not later than five (5) calendar days of the landlords awareness that a dispute has arisen concerning the rent pursuant to this Ordinance. To be eligible to file a petition, a landlord must have a current City business license. The landlord must disclose in his/her petition (or response if the landlord is not the petitioner) whether the rental unit has been rented to person(s) other than the opposing party and the amount of rent being charged. B. RESPONSE: Within one (1) working day of receipt of the petition the Secretary shall notify the opposing party to the petition for review that he/she has five (5) calendar days from the date of mailing of the Secretary's notice to file a response to the petition. In addition to sending written notice of the right to respond, the Secretary shall attempt to make telephone contact with the opposing party to notify him/her of the petition and the right to respond. To be eligible to file a response to a petition, a landlord must have a current City business license. C. HEARING: The Hearing Officer shall have a goal of hearing the matter within fifteen (15) calendar days of the filing of the original petition pursuant to this Ordinance. Priority for hearing dates shall be given to petitions filed pursuant to this Ordinance. The Secretary shall notify the petitioner, the opposing party, and, if applicable, the current tenant of the rental unit in dispute, of the date of the hearing at 1 east five (5) days prior to the hearing date. The Hearing Officer shall render his/her decision not more than two (2) working days after the conclusion of the hearing. The parties, as well as the current tenant in cases where the current tenant is not a party to the matter, shall be notified in writing of the decision. Disputes involving the same real property or more than one unit in any single building may be consolidated for hearing by the Secretary if the Secretary determines consolidation to be in the best interest of the parties. D. APPEAL. Either party may appeal the Hearing Officer's decision within two (2) working days after receipt of the notice of the decision, by filing with the Secretary a written notice of such appeal setting forth the grounds therefor. The Secretary shall set the matter for hearing and cause notice thereof to be given to the parties no less than five (5) days prior to such hearing. Priority shall be given to appeals filed pursuant to this Ordinance. The Board shall have a goal of hearing the appeal within fifteen (15) working days of the filing of the notice of appeal. Board hearings shall be conducted pursuant to the provisions of Section 8 of the Residential Rent Arbitration Ordinance except that the standards and limitations set forth in Sections 4 and 5 of this Ordinance shall be substituted for the references to Section 5 of the Residential Rent Arbitration Ordinance. The conclusions and findings of the Board shall be final and there shall be no appeal rights to the City Council. The Boards action does not preclude review by a court of competent jurisdiction. SECTION 9: REMEDY. A. An aggrieved party may bring an action for injunctive relief or damages, or both, in a court of competent jurisdiction for any violation of the provisions of this Ordinance. B. Failure of a party to abide by an order or decision of a Hearing Officer and/or the Residential Rent Arbitration Board shall be deemed a violation of this Ordinance and shall be punishable as an infraction unless otherwise provided in this code. C. Each party violating this Ordinance shall be guilty of a separate offense for each and every day during any portion of which any violation of any provision of this Ordinance is committed, continued, or permitted by such person and shall be punishable accordingly. D. Such violations may be redressed by Civil Action brought by the City Attorney or the landlord, tenant, prospective tenant or his/her representative. E. Any person convicted of an infraction under the provisions of this Ordinance shall be punishable upon the first conviction of a fine of not more than fifty dollars ($50.00), and for a second conviction within a period of a year by a fine of not more than one hundred dollars ($100.00), and for a third or any subsequent conviction within a one-year period by a fine of not more than two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00). However, an evaluation beyond the third conviction within a one-year period may be charged by the City Attorney or the District Attorney as a misdemeanor, and the penalty for a conviction of the same shall be punishable by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or by imprisonment in the County Jail for a period of not more than six months or by both. F. In addition to the punishment provided by law, a violator is liable for such costs, expenses, and disbursements paid or incurred by the City in abatement and prosecution of the violation. G. Pursuant to Section 836.5 of the California Penal Code, the Deputy City Manager or his/her authorized representatives are hereby authorized to enforce this ordinance and arrest violators thereof. H. The City Manager shall have the power to designate by written order that particular officers or employees shall be authorized to enforce particular provisions of this Ordinance in addition to those officers enumerated in subsection g. Officers or employees so designated shall have the authority to arrest persons who violate any of said provisions. SECTION 10. SEVERABILITY. This Ordinance shall be liberally construed to achieve its purposes and preserve its validity. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or invalid or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not effect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or invalid or ineffective. SECTION 11. CEQA. This Ordinance complies with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. 8 SECTION 12. RECITALS. The recitals herein are true and correct and are an integral part of this Ordinance. SECTION 13. NON-WAIVERABILITY. Any provision, whether oral or written, in or pertaining to a rental agreement whereby any provision of this Ordinance is waived or modified, is against public policy and void. SECTION 14. PUBLICATION. Within three (3) days.of the date of this Ordinance, the City Clerk is directed to cause a copy of the Ordinance to be published twice weekly, for the duration of the emergency, in the Tribune and the Montclarion. The term "emergency" as used in this Ordinance shall mean the emergency declared by the City Council on October 20, 1991. OPT 79 1991 INCOUNCIL, OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA, UUI c " 19 PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES BA2ILE, <#SWMC)S, GIBSONHASKELL, MILEY, MOORE, OGAWA, RILES, SPEES, and PRESIDENT HARRIS , NOES NONE ABSENT CANNON, - 1 ABSTENTION NONE 9 ATTEST: ARRECE JAMESON City Clerk and Clerk of the Council 6 0 0 -24 2(1/ 3 1) of the City of Oakland, California