Department of Education

Central/Regional/Division Level
1.0 Summary of Information Required
1.1 Name of Delivery Unit: __________
1.2 Total No. of Officials and Employees Entitled to PBB: __________
2.0 Ranking of Personnel
2.1 Top 15%
(Best Performer)
2.2 Next 30%
(Better Performer)
2.3 Next 55%
(Good Performer)
Form 2.0
REPORT ON RANKING OF PERSONNEL
Ranking
TOTAL:
Annex 7
No. of Employees Entitled to PBB
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
Form 2.0
REPORT ON RANKING OF PERSONNEL
Department of Education
Performance-Based Bonus
Performance Review and Evaluation Template
Individual Level
Fiscal Year 2013
Region Division Unique ItemNumber Last Name First Name Middle Name 1st Semester
FY 2013
2nd Semester
FY 2013
Average
Performance
Rating
Rank Percentile Performance
Category
(If delivery unit
falls under the
'Best' or 'Better'
category)
Performance
Category
(If delivery unit
falls under the
'Good' category)
Not Entitled #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
Employee Profile Performance Rating Performance Ranking Employee Eligibility
NOTE: The employee
has satisfied the
criteria under provision
nos. 11 (a-f) and 12 of
DepEd Order No. 33, s.
2013.
(Yes/No)
INSTRUCTIONS:
1.
Column Description
Column A Name of Region
Column B Name of Division
Column C Unique Item Number
Column D Last Name
Column E First Name
Column F Middle Name
Column G Employee Eligibility
Column H 1st Semester FY 2013
Column I 2nd Semester FY 2013
Performance Rating
Fill out the required data/information in the Individual PRET. For columns which already have formula, copy the formula up to the end row or last row of individual.
Individual Profile
Employee Eligibility
The following table serves as a guide on the specific data/information that each column should contain.
Column J Average Performance Rating
Column K Rank
Column L Percentile
Column M Performance Category
(If delivery unit falls under the 'Best' or 'Better' category)
Column N Performance Category
(If delivery unit falls under the 'Good' category)
4.
5.
6.
7. Using Annex 9 of DepEd Order No. 33, s. 2014, the RPREC should officially submit to the NPREC on or before August 15, 2014 the consolidated Forms 2.0 or Reports on Ranking of Personnel for the Regional Office and all
the Division Offices within the region.
After conducting the Individual Ranking, transfer the results from the Individual PRET to Form 2.0 or Report on Ranking of Personnel. This form is also formula-based. Double-check the figures versus the results in the
Individual PRET. This form is a refined version of the form enclosed in DepEd Order No. 33, s. 2014 as Annex 7. Please use this format instead.
After filling out all the required fields in the Individual PRET, sort the Average Performance Rating (Column J) from highest to lowest. This can be done by clicking the drop-down button in Cell J9 and selecting 'Sort Largest
to Smallest' from the options. This procedure will rank the personnel within the delivery unit based on their FY 2013 average performance rating.
All formula-based columns should be copied up to the end row or last row of personnel.
Performance Ranking
Remarks
For checking purposes, input 'Yes' if the employee has satisfied the criteria under provision nos. 11 (a-f) and 12
of DepEd Order No. 33, s. 2013 and 'No' if otherwise. Should the employee does not satisfy any of the applicable
criteria, he/she should be removed from the list.
Performance Rating
Data/information required in these columns should be encoded in number format.
If the employee is the head of delivery unit, input 'Head of Office' in both Columns H and I. These include all
heads of each delivery unit specified under provision and Third Level Officials under CESPES (i.e.,
Undersecretaries, Assistant Secretaries, Directors, Assistant Directors, SDSs, ASDSs and all designated Third Level
Officials in an Acting or Officer-In-Charge (OIC) capacity).
This procedure will automatically assign the Head of Office or Delivery Unit to the top of the ranking. However,
Third Level Officials must still satisfy the criteria specified under provision no. 11 (a-f) of DepEd Order No. 33, s.
2013.
NOTE: Per DepEd Order No. 33, s. 2014, "The heads of each delivery unit shall automatically receive the highest
amount of incentive which the delivery unit will receive based on the performance categorization specified in
Table 8 under provision no. 25 of this Order. However, performance ratings of the heads of delivery units shall be
subjected to executive checking and vetting by their respective immediate superiors to be submitted to the PBB
Fill out the required data/information in the Individual PRET. For columns which already have formula, copy the formula up to the end row or last row of individual.
Individual Profile
Employee Eligibility
NOTE: All personnel who should be included in the list and be entitled to 2013 PBB should observe the criteria
specified under provision nos. 11 (a-f) and 12 of DepEd Order No. 33, s. 2014.
NOTE: All DepEd officials and employees, including teachers, enumerated in Annex 4 of DepEd Order No. 33, s.
2014, who are recipients of national awards in FY 2013 from Civil Service Commission (CSC), Metrobank
Foundation and National Literacy Awards which are duly recognized by both CSC and DepEd are automatically
entitled to PhP 35,000 bonus regardless of the rank or performance category of their delivery unit. These
personnel are not subject to ranking; hence there is no need to include their names in the list for Individual
PRET.
The following table serves as a guide on the specific data/information that each column should contain.
This column already has formula which computes for the average performance rating of the first and second
semesters. Copy the formula up to the end row or last row of personnel. Specifically, the following have been
followed:
- If the employee is the head of office/delivery unit, the average performance rating is automatically set at ten
(10) and rank is automatically set at Rank 1.
- If the employee has no rating (blank) for any of the two (2) semesters, this column shows that the employee is
'Not Entitled' to the FY 2013 PBB.
- If the employee has an 'Unsatisfactory' rating (4.5 and below) for any of the two (2) semesters, this column
shows that the employee is 'Not Entitled' to the FY 2013 PBB.
This column already has formula which computes for the rank of each personnel. Copy the formula up to the end
row or last row of personnel.
This column already has formula which computes for the percentile by which each personnel belongs. Copy the
formula up to the end row or last row of personnel.
This column already has formula which computes for the Performance Category of each personnel should the
delivey unit falls under the 'Best' or 'Better' category. The ranking of the delivery units will be done nationally.
The NPREC will conduct the ranking. The results of the ranking of delivery units as well as the amount of PBB
incentive per personnel will be disseminated through a memorandum.
This column already has formula which computes for the Performance Category of each personnel should the
delivey unit falls under the 'Good' category. The ranking of the delivery units will be done nationally. The NPREC
will conduct the ranking. The results of the ranking of delivery units as well as the amount of PBB incentive per
personnel will be disseminated through a memorandum.
Using Annex 9 of DepEd Order No. 33, s. 2014, the RPREC should officially submit to the NPREC on or before August 15, 2014 the consolidated Forms 2.0 or Reports on Ranking of Personnel for the Regional Office and all
the Division Offices within the region.
After conducting the Individual Ranking, transfer the results from the Individual PRET to Form 2.0 or Report on Ranking of Personnel. This form is also formula-based. Double-check the figures versus the results in the
Individual PRET. This form is a refined version of the form enclosed in DepEd Order No. 33, s. 2014 as Annex 7. Please use this format instead.
After filling out all the required fields in the Individual PRET, sort the Average Performance Rating (Column J) from highest to lowest. This can be done by clicking the drop-down button in Cell J9 and selecting 'Sort Largest
to Smallest' from the options. This procedure will rank the personnel within the delivery unit based on their FY 2013 average performance rating.
All formula-based columns should be copied up to the end row or last row of personnel.
Performance Ranking