Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/oceaneng
Undrained strength behaviour of a cemented
marine clay under monotonic and cyclic loading
G.G. Moses
a
, S.N. Rao
a,
, P.N. Rao
b
a
Department of Ocean Engineering, IIT-Madras, Chenni, 600036, India
b
Visakhapatnam Port Trust, Visakhapatnam, 530035, India
Received 5 August 2002; received in revised form 22 November 2002; accepted 30 November 2002
Abstract
The paper presents the results of a series of monotonic and cyclic triaxial shear tests carried
out to study the inuence of the strain effect and load cycles on the undrained shear strength
of a cemented marine clay from the East coast of India. The undrained shear strength of Indian
coastal marine clay has been established from a detailed shear testing carried out in three
phases. Undisturbed soil samples taken out from the seabed were used in the test. In the rst
part, a comprehensive monotonic shear testing has been carried out under both stress-controlled
and strain rate-controlled conditions. In the second phase on identical soil specimen, undrained
cyclic shear tests were carried out at various cyclic stress ratios (CSR) and these stress levels
are chosen in such a way so that no failure occurred during testing. In the nal phase post
cyclic monotonic shear testing was conducted to qualitatively evaluate the damage caused by
cyclic loading. The monotonic shear test results bring out the inuence of cementation that
can be detected by the stress-controlled test. The cyclic stress results are analysed in terms of
CSR. Further, the results are correlated in terms of stress path.
2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Cemented clay; Stress-controlled testing; Cyclic loading; Post cyclic strength; Degradation
index
n
i
n
g
T
y
p
e
o
f
t
e
s
t
S
t
r
a
i
n
%
a
t
T
o
t
a
l
d
e
v
i
a
t
o
r
P
o
r
e
w
a
t
e
r
S
k
e
m
p
t
o
n
s
p
o
r
e
%
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
(
s
3
)
f
a
i
l
u
r
e
(
f
)
s
t
r
e
s
s
a
t
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
a
t
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
p
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
t
o
t
a
l
d
e
v
i
a
t
o
r
s
t
r
e
s
s
f
a
i
l
u
r
e
(
s
f
)
f
a
i
l
u
r
e
(
u
f
)
a
t
f
a
i
l
u
r
e
(
A
f
)
k
P
a
k
P
a
2
0
0
S
t
r
a
i
n
8
.
5
5
1
4
5
.
4
6
6
4
.
8
0
0
.
4
4
0
.
0
0
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
d
1
2
.
8
4
1
3
5
.
0
8
8
5
.
1
0
0
.
6
3
7
.
1
4
S
S
,
12
h
S
S
,
1
h
1
4
.
5
0
1
3
1
.
3
0
9
6
.
0
0
0
.
7
3
9
.
7
3
S
S
,
2
h
1
8
.
0
0
1
2
6
.
3
3
1
0
0
.
0
5
0
.
7
9
1
3
.
1
5
1
0
0
S
t
r
a
i
n
8
.
2
9
1
0
6
.
7
4
4
3
.
7
3
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
d
1
2
.
6
8
6
8
.
5
0
3
0
.
0
0
0
.
4
4
3
5
.
8
3
S
S
,
12
h
S
S
,
1
h
1
3
.
8
9
6
0
.
7
1
3
2
.
0
0
0
.
5
3
4
3
.
1
2
S
S
,
2
h
1
6
.
5
0
5
4
.
4
0
2
7
.
0
0
0
.
5
0
4
9
.
0
4
7
5
S
t
r
a
i
n
7
.
2
4
8
8
.
1
7
2
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
3
0
.
0
0
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
d
8
.
6
2
5
1
.
9
8
1
9
.
7
5
0
.
3
8
4
1
.
0
4
S
S
,
12
h
S
S
,
1
h
1
0
.
5
0
4
1
.
0
0
2
3
.
8
3
0
.
5
8
5
3
.
5
0
S
S
,
2
h
1
2
.
0
4
3
2
.
1
3
2
5
.
5
4
0
.
8
0
6
3
.
5
6
(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
o
n
n
e
x
t
p
a
g
e
)
1776 G.G. Moses et al. / Ocean Engineering 30 (2003) 17651789
T
a
b
l
e
2
(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
C
o
n
n
i
n
g
T
y
p
e
o
f
t
e
s
t
S
t
r
a
i
n
%
a
t
T
o
t
a
l
d
e
v
i
a
t
o
r
P
o
r
e
w
a
t
e
r
S
k
e
m
p
t
o
n
s
p
o
r
e
%
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
(
s
3
)
f
a
i
l
u
r
e
(
f
)
s
t
r
e
s
s
a
t
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
a
t
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
p
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
t
o
t
a
l
d
e
v
i
a
t
o
r
s
t
r
e
s
s
f
a
i
l
u
r
e
(
s
f
)
f
a
i
l
u
r
e
(
u
f
)
a
t
f
a
i
l
u
r
e
(
A
f
)
k
P
a
k
P
a
5
0
S
t
r
a
i
n
4
.
6
1
6
2
.
9
2
1
4
.
5
0
0
.
2
3
0
.
0
0
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
d
6
.
5
0
3
7
.
3
8
1
3
.
6
7
0
.
3
7
4
0
.
5
9
S
S
,
12
h
S
S
,
1
h
9
.
5
9
3
0
.
1
7
1
3
.
5
1
0
.
4
5
5
2
.
0
5
S
S
,
2
h
1
1
.
5
0
2
3
.
2
4
1
2
.
7
8
0
.
5
5
6
3
.
0
6
2
5
S
t
r
a
i
n
3
.
6
2
4
1
.
1
3
6
.
4
0
0
.
1
6
0
.
0
0
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
d
3
.
0
0
2
2
.
4
3
3
.
6
7
0
.
1
6
4
5
.
4
7
S
S
,
12
h
S
S
,
1
h
3
.
0
7
1
7
.
2
8
4
.
8
7
0
.
2
8
5
7
.
9
9
S
S
,
2
h
7
.
1
1
1
3
.
1
0
4
.
2
1
0
.
3
2
6
8
.
1
5
S
S
,
S
t
r
e
s
s
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
d
C
U
t
r
i
a
x
i
a
l
s
h
e
a
r
t
e
s
t
.
1777 G.G. Moses et al. / Ocean Engineering 30 (2003) 17651789
trolled tests reveal some typical interesting trends. For samples consolidated at s
3
= 100 kPa, there is a possibility of severe disruption of bonds because of higher-
level shear stress. In the strain-controlled test, the failure strain for sample tested at
s
3
= 25 kPa is 3.0% and this is increased to 8.3% at s
3
= 100 kPa. These bring
out that the failure strains are almost doubled in stress-controlled testing. It may be
noted that at the value of s
3
when once chemically induced bonds are thoroughly
disturbed, creep takes place to a signicant extent and hence there is an increase in
failure strain from 8.5 to 18%. This indirectly suggests that there is a better disruption
of bonds. In a soil like this, with a good amount of chemical bonding, the system
can be considered as that of a occulated one and if this soil is subjected to shearing,
there is a disruption in bonding encouraging a reorientation in particles and all this
causes a good amount of increase in pore water pressure with a consequent reduction
in effective stresses and further due to creep, the soil under stress-controlled testing
is becoming weak. For a similar testing carried out by Sangrey (1972) on cemented
sensitive soils, signicant reduction in strength under sustained loading is reported.
At this conning pressure (s
3
) there is a good amount of reduction in strength
and for these conditions the soil is overconsolidated and most of the contribution is
due to the cohesion, which is mainly because of cementation. It is not only the stress
level but also the duration of the shear process under sustained loading which plays
a signicant role in destroying the cementation. Consequently, greater changes in
strength can be expected at this condition. The percentage of reduction in strength
is further evaluated quantitatively. At s
3
= 100 kPa this reduction is 49%. In one
of the earlier investigation carried out by Casagrande and Wilson (1951) who brought
out the importance of strain rate in the strength testing, with increase in the time of
loading, there is a decrease in the strength especially in the clayey soils. Hvorslev
(1960) has explained the strain rate dependency in terms of rheological component.
In order that this rheological component becomes negligible the testing has to be
carried out be at very slow strain rate. The importance of the strain rate to be adopted
is further brought out by Bishop and Henkel (1962). Sangrey (1972) is one of the
rst few who brought out the concept of breakdown of cementation bonds in
cemented sensitive clays through testing under both sustained loading and under
controlled strain rate conditions. With increase in construction activities in coastal
areas in cemented soil systems and in quick sensitive clays, it is quite justied to
carry out shear testing under controlled stress conditions.
Cementation effect is wiped out partly during consolidation at high pressures and
partly due to disruption of cementation bonds at high level of shear stress mobilised
during the initial stages of shearing sample in this part of testing.
6.2. Failure envelopes for soil
From the summarised failure envelopes (Fig. 7), it can been seen that all the points
obtained from the test with s
3
up to 100 kPa fall more or less in a well-dened
straight line either passing through the origin or with minimal cohesion intercept.
The tests carried out with a slower duration loading (2 h) indicate the line passing
through the origin and this brings out that with the increase in the load duration, the
1778 G.G. Moses et al. / Ocean Engineering 30 (2003) 17651789
Fig. 7. MohrCoulomb effective failure envelope for stress-controlled shear test.
cementation effect is becoming completely wiped out and the soil behaves as if it
is truly normally consolidated system. For the samples tested with load duration of
1
2
h and 1 h, there is a small amount of cohesion intercept. However the samples
tested at a very high conning pressures s
3
= 200 kPa (s
3
P
c
), there is slightly
different trend as indicated in the MohrCoulomb diagram. Denitely, there is a
marginal decrease in strength with increase in load duration, but these points joined
together by a straight line passing through the origin indicate a complete disruption
of bonds. It is interesting to note that this line is steeper than other lines and this
give rise to higher values of friction. The variation in moisture content during the
isotropic consolidation is shown in Fig. 8. The critical examination of failure water
content reveals particular trend for the rst four samples tested up to a conning
pressure s
3
= 100 kPa. During isotropic consolidation, the amount of water that has
come out is very small. But for the sample tested at s
3
of 200 kPa there is a good
amount of decrease in moisture content during isotropic consolidation phase preced-
Fig. 8. Failure moisture content plotted against conning pressure.
1779 G.G. Moses et al. / Ocean Engineering 30 (2003) 17651789
ing the undrained shearing and the soil is more compact. However in the other
samples tested at lower conning pressures with in the range of preconsolidation
pressure there is practically no change in the moisture content, but with s
3
= 200
kPa, the system is completely retransformed into a normally consolidated system.
The average failure envelope for strain-controlled tests is shown by a dotted line in
the same gure. The strength components are further summarised in Table 3. For
the rst set of points obtained for s
3
up to 100 kPa, in strain-controlled tests, the
friction parameter is 28.1 with a marginal cohesion of C = 1.47 kPa. However,
under the same strain-controlled test, from the test conducted s
3
00 kPa, the f
value has been signicantly reduced to 20.5 and with practically no cohesion inter-
cept. This clearly suggests the inuence of the s
3
. In the case of the stress-controlled
test, for the test conducted up to s
3
= 100 kPa, the frictional parameter is further
reduced even up to 15 depending upon the load duration applied. However for the
test conducted for s
3
100 kPa the frictional parameter is higher and is nearly
21.9. These changes clearly bring out the inuence of cementation.
In the overall analysis of the results of undisturbed cemented soil, comparison of
the results of strain-controlled and stress-controlled reveal that at a given stress level,
strains are low in a strain-controlled testing, but are more in the stress-controlled
testing. This may lead to underestimation in strains. Hence, it is recommended that
in the case of strain-sensitive cemented soils, it is required to adopt a suitable stress-
controlled test to study the strength and deformation behaviour. Any stress-controlled
test with a load duration of 12 h under incremental loading is adequate enough to
take care of the stabilisation of pore water pressure.
7. Stress-controlled cyclic loading
These cyclic load tests were conducted at loading frequencies of 0.05 to 0.17 Hz
and these almost match with the wave frequencies along the Indian coast. Under
cyclic loading, the samples were tested at cyclic stress ratios (CSRs) ranging from
Table 3
Shear strength parameters
Type of test Effective cohesion (C) Effective angle of
(kPa) friction (f)
Strain-controlled test
Up to s
3
= 100 kPa 1.47 28.1
Above s
3
= 100 kPa 0 20.5
Stress-controlled test (up to s
3
= 100 kPa)
0.99 18.5 1
2
h Load increment
1-h Load increment 0.34 17
2-h Load increment 0 15
Stress-controlled test (above s
3
= 100 kPa) 0 21.9
1780 G.G. Moses et al. / Ocean Engineering 30 (2003) 17651789
0.25 to 0.57 at a conning pressure of 100 kPa. The typical soil response observed
at a frequency of 0.16 is presented in Fig. 9, which shows the variations in cyclic
strain and pore water pressure response with the number of cycles.
7.1. Strain response
It can be observed that within a few cycles of loading, the deformation increased
quite rapidly and after a certain number of cycles, deformation is stabilised. During
the unloading stages of the cyclic loading there is elastic rebound in both defor-
mations and pore water pressures and this can be due to release of energy from the
system. In the rst few cycles of load application, most of the energy is absorbed
by the system, resulting in a good amount of plastic and permanent deformation and
residual pore water pressure. During the subsequent cyclic loading, at a given stress
value under subfailure condition, the rate of absorption of energy into the system
gradually decreases with increase in number of cycles and nally the soil system
attains a stable elastic equilibrium. With the increase in CSR, both strain and pore
water pressures increase with the number of cycles. From this it is evident that the
cyclic strains and pore water pressure are interrelated as observed earlier by Kout-
softas (1978) and Matsui et al. (1980). For the samples tested under CSR up to 0.35,
the increases in the deformation and pore water pressure are lower compared to the
Fig. 9. Variation in cyclic strainpore water pressure with number of cycles.
1781 G.G. Moses et al. / Ocean Engineering 30 (2003) 17651789
values observed at higher CSRs and it is felt that cyclic loading has not signicantly
inuenced the behaviour. From the results presented in Fig. 9, it could be seen that
the testing has been continued up to 3000 to 9000 cycles. At CSR values of 0.26
and 0.35 strain is almost stabilised within 2000 cycles. However, at higher CSR
values of 0.53 and 0.57 it is necessary that testing has to be continued up to 9500
cycles for stabilising deformation. As the CSR is changed from 0.26 to 0.57 the
equilibrium strains reached are between 0.8 to 6.3%; but the system is stable without
physical collapse. However, as the CSR level is increased to 0.6, the soil sample
collapsed even at 2000 cycles. It is to be also noted that a few attempts were made
at CSR values greater than 0.6 and these tests could not be successfully completed
and in these, the samples collapsed at cycles less than 10. The results from these
tests are not reported in this paper.
By conducting a series of cyclic triaxial tests, Sangrey et al. (1969, 1978) has
dened a threshold cyclic stress ratio, which is dened as the maximum level of
cyclic stress that cannot not lead to failure during cyclic loading, regardless of the
number of applied load cycles. From these values, it can be considered that the
threshold limit in terms of CSR can be considered as 0.57 to 0.58 at a frequency of
0.17 and for any design purpose the threshold CSR can be considered as 0.57. It is
suggested that this threshold limit is considered as a function of stress history, cemen-
tation and frequency of loading. Incidentally, from another work carried out in this
laboratory (Rao, 1988) on marine clay with less cementation, a threshold CSR of as
much as 0.8 was observed. For another work carried out in Germany (Ritchwien
and Narasimha Rao, 1992) on North Sea marine clay, the threshold CSR is recorded
as 0.4 and this clay can be considered as overconsolidated clay. The degradation in
the system at CSR values higher than the threshold values of CSR can be explained
in terms of the rupture of cementation bonds. At higher stress levels, bonds become
ruptured and after a few cycles of loading, the soil behaves like normally consoli-
dated clay. Hence, there is an increase in permanent deformation and pore water
pressure as reported by Wilson and Greenwood (1974). Further, it is reported that
the application of higher cyclic stress ratio could lead to strain softening (Ishihara,
1985) leading to large shear strains and higher pore water pressures. Even though
there is no collapse, critical examination of the data reveals that there is a very slow
and continous increase in the deformation even after 2000 cycles of loading. It is
quite likely that at higher levels of CSR, the cementation bonds become ruptured
within 1000 cycles of loading and beyond this, more or less slow creep deformation
sets in.
7.2. Pore water pressure response
This aspect of collapse of bonds can further be explained in terms of pore water
pressures developed. From the results presented in same Fig. 9, it can be seen that
the development of pore water pressure is similar to the development in strains. For
stabilisation in pore water pressure, it requires more cycles than the number of cycles
required for stabilisation in deformation. At high values of CSR of 0.6 where collapse
is reported, there is a sudden increase in pore water pressure at the collapse stage.
1782 G.G. Moses et al. / Ocean Engineering 30 (2003) 17651789
For the purpose of comparison, the strains and pore water pressures recorded in
monotonic shear tests conducted at a cell pressure of s
3
= 100 kPa, as shown in
Fig. 2, are used. In the conventional monotonic shear tests these samples have shown
signs of failure at an axial strains of 6.0% and pore water pressure of 28 kPa at
failure. In comparison, during the cyclic loading at a CSR of 0.26 and 0.35, the
maximum pore water pressure is recorded between 13 and 20 kPa. In cyclic tests at
CSR of 0.44 and 0.53, even though failure has not attained, the maximum pore
water pressure reached crossed the maximum value of 28 kPa recorded under static
monotonic stress-controlled shear test. At CSR of 0.57, the maximum pore water
pressure is 50 kPa. This clearly bring out at that at low value of CSR, cyclic loading
has no signicant inuence on both deformation and pore water pressure response
irrespective of number of load cycles. Beyond certain CSR values, the pore water
pressure is on the rise and this can also be explained in terms of Skemptons pore
water pressure parameter, A
cyclic
, worked out and presented in Fig. 10.
Fig. 10. (a) Variation in cyclic strain with CSR. (b) Variation in pore pressure parameter A with CSR.
1783 G.G. Moses et al. / Ocean Engineering 30 (2003) 17651789
The strains vs. number of cycles are plotted in Fig. 10a and the variations in pore
water are presented in Fig. 10b. From these plots it can be seen that the maximum
levels at which the sample still remains stable is also controlled by the loading
frequency. At a frequency of 0.17 the maximum CSR at which the sample can remain
stable is 0.57 and this CSR level reduces to 0.47 when the frequency is reduced to
0.05. This is seen from the development of both deformation and pore water press-
ures. Lefebvre and LeBoeuf (1989) reports a similar reduction in the CSR with the
frequency of loading on Grande Baleine structured clay.
From the pore water pressure developments it is also observed that beyond CSR
of 0.35, the pore water pressures recorded even during the non-failure cyclic loading
conditions are more than the pore water pressure recorded at failure condition in
static shear. Beyond CSR of 0.35, A
cyclic
recorded for all frequencies are greater than
0.5. Such higher values of A indicated rupturing of bonds in the cemented soil sys-
tem. In contrast, for less cemented soil under normally consolidated conditions, low
values of A are reported by Rao (1988) in a similar type of marine clay. All these
clearly indicate that the cementation bonds have a major role in xing up the endur-
ance limits. The safe cyclic stress level to be used in the designs should consider
all these aspects of cementation, stress history and wave loading frequency.
7.3. Degradation during cyclic loading
Combining the sustained stress with the deformation observations, the results can
be evaluated in terms of deformation modulus, E
s
. The variation in this E
s
can be
used as a parameter of performance index and if this value is substantially reduced
during the cyclic loading, it can be taken as degradation in the system. In fact, this
index can be conveniently used in estimating the settlements and lateral deections
in case of structures subjected to cyclic loading. The changes in E
s
values under
cyclic loading have been worked out for a few typical cases and presented in Fig.
11. These refer to tests carried out at CSR of 0.26 and load cycles generated at
Fig. 11. Variation of modulus of compression with number of cycles.
1784 G.G. Moses et al. / Ocean Engineering 30 (2003) 17651789
frequencies of 0.17 and 0.05; and those results correspond to threshold CSR of 0.57
at a frequency of 0.17 and CSR of 0.47 at a frequency of 0.05 are presented. In
each of the systems, there is a considerable reduction in E
s
and these E
s
values are
reduced to 1/3rd to 1/4th of the original values depending on the stress levels. Similar
reductions in E
s
values are reported by Koutsoftas (1978) in marine clays.
In order to bring out further analysis on the effect of number of cycles N and the
cyclic stress levels on the cyclic stiffness, the cyclic modulii at different cycles are
normalised with respect to the modulus at the rst cycle. This approach was proposed
by Idriss et al. (1978). Accordingly, the degradation index was dened as
d
E
N
E
I
s
d
e
CN
s
d
e
C1
e
C1
e
CN
(1)
where E
N
and E
I
are the secant modulii at cycles 1 and N, respectively;
C1
and
CN
are the axial strains at cycles 1 and N, respectively. The concept of this relationship
is to establish the backbone curve (i.e. the locus of the tips of the hysteresis loop)
for the degraded state (for the behaviour during the rst and subsequent cycles).
Because of this, at a particular strain level, , it is possible to relate the tip of the
loop in a cycle N to that measured in the rst cycle. Then the entire backbone
curve in cycles N can be related to rst cycle (non-degraded) backbone curve. This
degradation index is a measure of irreversible degradation process occurring in the
structure of the clay; therefore the d remains constant or decreases, but does not
increase during cyclic loading.
The variation in the degradation index, d with number of cycles for all CSRs are
presented in the Fig. 12. There is a steep reduction in this index within the rst 100
cycles. This drop can be considered from 1 to 0.4. Beyond this 100 cycles of loading,
there is a gradual reduction with cycles and this value is almost stabilised at values,
Fig. 12. Variation in degradation index with number of cycles.
1785 G.G. Moses et al. / Ocean Engineering 30 (2003) 17651789
0.23 to 0.3. Thus, degradation conrms the softening in clay. With increase in num-
ber of cycles, the inuence of CSR and frequency of loading becomes less dominant.
Irrespective of frequency of cyclic loading, at the ultimate stages of cyclic loading
the degradation parameter of 0.2 to 0.3 can be conveniently used in the designs.
8. Post-cyclic monotonic shear behaviour
After getting more or less stabilised values in the strains during cyclic loading,
the cyclic loading is discontinued and the deviator stress is reduced to zero, and on
the same samples conventional shear tests are conducted till failure is reached. A
typical set of curves obtained for the test conducted for s
3
= 100 kPa is presented
in Fig. 13. For the sake of comparison, the stressstrain pore water pressure curves
obtained from the conventional shear tests on samples without precyclic loading is
also shown in the same gure. In this gure, the results obtained for six values of
CSR varying between 0.26 and 0.57 are presented. The stress levels recorded during
the precyclic loading are shown in the x-axis, corresponding to zero deviatoric stress.
These are the permanent residual strains recorded at the end of cyclic loading. From
Fig. 13. Strainstress pore water pressure plot during post-cyclic monotonic shear test.
1786 G.G. Moses et al. / Ocean Engineering 30 (2003) 17651789
this stressstrain curves, it can be seen that under post-cyclic monotonic shear load-
ing, the curves are so steep and within a very small strain, more than 90% of the
ultimate deviatoric stress values have been reached. Moreover, these steep curves
have motivated earlier investigations to suggest that the cyclic load has introduced
brittleness in the system. Another interesting point to be noted is that there is no
phenomenal rise in the pore water pressure. Further, it is to be noted that the
maximum deviatoric stress recorded in all the PCMT indicate there is substantial
decrease in the strength. The maximum deviatoric stress values are compared with
the conventional stressstrain curves obtained and these indicate that at a very low
values of CSR of 0.28 the peak point almost merges with the deviator stress value
of that of conventional shear test corresponding to deformational level. This nal
deformation during the peak cyclic loading controls the strength values during the
precyclic monotonic test.
A study by Thiers and Seed (1969) showed that the reduction in the post-cyclic
strength is a function of the amount of strain during cyclic loading to which the
sample was subjected to a clay sample suffered before it is loaded monotonically to
failure. This strain-dependent hypothesis was conrmed by Lee and Flocht (1975).
It appears that the change in the post-cyclic strength is less prominent. The cyclic
loading produces cyclic strains less than half of the normal static strains to failure
(Lee and Flocht, 1975). Sangrey and France (1980) observed that the shear strength
is decreased by 50% as the cyclic strains approach the threshold level of repeated
loading from the data presented by Anderson et al. (1980) on Draman clay, it can
be observed that loss in strength is not so drastic even for large cyclic strain levels.
The effective stress path can be traced during the post-cyclic monotonic testing
stage and these stress paths are further summarised in Fig. 14. This particular plot
is mainly made for the results obtained at s
3
= 100 kPa. For the sake of comparison,
Fig. 14. Effective stress path for the post-cyclic monotonic test.
1787 G.G. Moses et al. / Ocean Engineering 30 (2003) 17651789
the effective stress path recorded during conventional shear test is also shown in the
same gure. The average MohrCoulomb line plotted in terms of effective stress
obtained from all the conventional shear test for s3 = 50 to 200 kPa (which is also
shown in Fig. 5) is reproduced in the plot. From this plot it is quite clear all the
stress paths in respect of PCML conditions are always on the left of the stress paths
to that of conventional shear test. This is an indication that there is a considerable
amount of pore water pressure developed in the cyclic loaded sample. These stress
paths are shown for all the tests conducted at different values of CSR varying from
0.26 to 0.57. As pointed out at the few levels of CSR between 0.26 and 0.5, there
is a gradual decrease in the peak deviator stress and for the test conducted beyond
this threshold CSR level, the peak deviator stress level remains constant, even though
there is an increase in the development of pore water pressure. If the last points
from each of these stress paths are joined, they almost fall on a horizontal line. If
an attempt is made to join the peak stress point of the stress path only, they can be
connected by a straight line shown as a dotted line. For the tests conducted between
the CSR of 0.26 and 0.44, the MohrCoulomb line gives reduced values of C
1
and
f
1
. It is to be noted that the reduced values of the peak deviator stress denitely
indicate the reduction in the shear strength brought out by cyclic loading. The evalu-
ation in terms of C
1
and f
1
may not reect the true behaviour.
9. Conclusions
1. In cemented clays even at high moisture contents, the system is quite brittle and
failure occurs at lower strains level and the stress-controlled tests exhibit lower
strength values during monotonic shear testing. Further, with the increase in the
stress levels during testing, the differences in the strength values as estimated
from these two modes of testing, viz. stress-controlled and strain rate-controlled
tests become smaller. This work brings out that in cemented clays it is essential
that the stress-controlled testing need to be employed in estimating the strength
parameters to be used in the designs.
2. The safe cyclic stress level to be used in design should consider all the aspect of
cementation, stress history and loading frequency. In this cemented clay tested,
for the cemented soil system up to a CSR of 0.35, the cyclic loading has not
caused much of damage to the system. Beyond this CSR, the pore water pressure
developed under cyclic loading even under non-failure condition indicates higher
values in comparison with the pore water pressure recorded in the conventional
monotonic shear tests. Also the results show that an increase in the frequency has
a positive inuence on the absolute value of threshold CSR. These characteristic
CSR level depends on the type of soil, cementation level and stress history.
3. The cyclic strains and cyclic pore water pressures increase sharply in the rst
2000 cycles of loading and there after stabilises and remain almost constant with
additional loading cycles provided CSR is less than a particular value dened as
threshold CSR value of strain for nonfailure condition can be 6%. At higher values
of cementation, this equilibrium strain at threshold limit can be less.
1788 G.G. Moses et al. / Ocean Engineering 30 (2003) 17651789
4. The analysis of results presented suggests the effect of cyclic loading can be
summarised in terms of variation in terms of a single degradation parameter, d
and also in terms of variation in soil modulus, E
s.
For this cemented clay, this d
can be reduced to 0.2 to 0.3 and E
s
can reduce to one quarter the original value.
5. The post-shear tests, called post-cyclic monotonic shear tests, can also be conduc-
ted to bring out the damage caused by cyclic loading. Post-cyclic monotonic shear
tests reveal a substantial decrease in the shear strength values. The analysis made
in terms of effective stress path reveals considerable shifting towards the left
indicating a good rise in pore water pressure during cyclic loading.
6. At higher values of CSR, the nal point in stress path merges with the Mohr
Coulomb line plot of the conventional static shear test. However, it is to be noted
that this merging occurs at a reduced value of strength.
References
Anderson, K.H., 1976. Behaviour of clay subjected to undrained cyclic loading. In: Proceedings of Inter-
national Conference on the Behaviour of Offshore Structures 76, Vol.1, Trondheim, Norway,, pp.
392403.
Anderson, K.H., 1983. Strength and deformation of clay subjected to cyclic loading. Norwegian Geotechn-
ical Institute Report 52412-8, 54.
Anderson, K.H., Pool, J.H., Brown, S.F., 1980. Cyclic and static laboratory tests on Drammen clay. J.
Geotech. Eng. Div., ASCE 106, 499529.
ASTM D 2573-94. Standard Test Method for Field Vane Shear Test in Cohesive Soil
ASTM D 4767-95. Standard Test Method for Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for
Cohesive Soils.
Bishop, A.W., Henkel, D.J., 1962. The measurement of soil properties in triaxial test. , 2nd ed. Edward
Arnold Limited, London.
Blight, G.E. 1964. The effect of non-uniform pore pressures on laboratory measurement of shear strength
of soils. Laboratory Shear Testing of Soils. ASTM, STP No. 361, 173184.
Brown, S.F., Lashine, A.K.F., Hyde, A.F.L., 1975. Repeated load triaxial testing of silty clay. Geotech-
nique 25, 95114.
Bryant, W.R., Cernock, P., Morelock, J., 1967. Shear strength and consolidation characteristics of marine
sediments from the Western Gulf of Mexico. In: Proceeding of the International Conference in Marine
Geotechnique, Illinois,, pp. 4164.
Casagrande, A., Wilson, S.D., 1951. Effect of rate of loading on strength of clays and shales at constant
water content. Geotechnique 2, 263281.
Demars, K.R., Nacci, V.A., Kelly, W.E., Wang, M.C., 1976. Carbonate contents an index property for
ocean sediments. In: Proceedings on 8th Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, OTC 2627., pp.
97106.
France, J.W., Sangrey, D.A., 1977. Effect of drainage in repeated loading of clays. J. Geotech. Engg.,
ASCE 103, 769785.
Hvorslev, J.M., 1960. Physical components of the shear strength of saturated clays. In: Proceeding on
Research Conference on Shear Strength of Soils, Colorado,, pp. 169273.
Hyodo, M., Yashuhara, K., 1988. Analytical procedure for evaluation pore water pressure and deformation
of saturated clay ground subjected to trafc loads. In: Proceedings of 6th International Conference on
Numerical Methods in Geomechanics, A.A. Balkema, Holland, pp. 653658.
Idriss, I.M., Dobry, R., Singh, R.D., 1978. Non-linear behaviour of soft clays during cyclic loadings. J.
Geotech. Engg., ASCE 104, 14271447.
Ishihara, K., 1980. Strength of cohesive soils under transient and cyclic loading condition. In: Proceedings
of 7th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering,
1789 G.G. Moses et al. / Ocean Engineering 30 (2003) 17651789
Ishihara, K., 1985. Stability of natural deposits during earthquakes. In: Proceedings on 11th Int. Conf.
on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, San Francisco, California, Vol 2,, pp. 321376.
Knight, K., Blight, G.E., 1965. Studies of some effects resulting form the unloading of soils. In: Inter-
national Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol 2,, pp. 103107.
Koutsoftas, D.C., 1978. Effect of cyclic loading on undrained strength of two marine clays. J. Geotech.
Eng., ASCE 104, 609620.
Koutsoftas, D.C., Fisher, J.A., 1980. Dynamic properties of two marine clays. J. Geotech. Eng., ASCE
106, 645657.
Lee, K.L., Focht, J.A., 1975. Cyclic testing of soil for ocean wave problems. In: Technology Conference,
7th Annual Proceedings, Houston, Texas, Vol. 1, No. OTC 2183,, pp. 343354.
Lefebvre, G., LeBuf, D., 1989. Stability threshold for cyclic loading of saturated clay. Canadian Geo-
technical Journal 26, 122131.
Matsui, T., Bahr, M.A., 1991. Cyclic stiffness degradation of undisturbed clays. In: Proceedings of 2nd
International conference on Geotechnical Earth quake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, St. Louis,
Missouri, USA,, pp. 4146.
Matusi, T., Ohara, H., Ito, T., 1980. Cyclic stress-strain history and shear characteristics of clay. J. Geo-
tech. Engg., ASCE 106, 11011120.
Mohan, D., Bhandari, R.K., 1977. Analysis of some Indian marine clay. In: International Symposium on
Soft clay, AIT, Bangkok, Thailand,, pp. 3547.
Panda, A.P.,1998. Behaviour of cemented marine clay under monotonic and cyclic shearing. Ph.D. thesis,
IIT, Madras, India.
Panda, A.P., Narasimha Rao, S., 1998. Undrained strength characteristics of an articially cemented mar-
ine clay. Maine Georesources and Geotechnology 16, 335353.
Rao, A.V.N., 1988. Strength and deformation behaviour of a soft marine clay under cyclic loading. Ph.D.
thesis, I.I.T., Madras, Chennai, India.
Ritchwien, Rao, Narasimha, 1992. The behaviour of sedimented Hamburg marine clay. Report of IGBE,
University of Hanover, Germany.
Sangrey, D.A., 1972. Naturally cemented sensitive soils. Geotechnique 22, 139152.
Sangrey, D.A., Henkel, D.J., Esring, N.I., 1969. The effective stress response of a saturated clay soil to
repeated loading. Can. Geotech. J 6, 241252.
Sangrey, D.A., France, J.W., 1980. Peak strength of clay soils after a repeated loading history. In: Proceed-
ings of International Conference on cyclic and Transient Loading, Rotterdam, The Netherlands,, pp.
421430.
Sangrey, D.A., Castro, G., Poulous, S.J., France, J.W., 1978. Cyclic loading of sands, silts, clays. In:
Proceedings of Specialty conference on Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, ASCE, Califor-
nia,, pp. 836851.
Seed, H.B., Chan, C.K., 1966. Clay strength under earthquake loading conditions. J. Soil Mech. Found.
Div., ASCE 92, 5378.
Seed, H.B., Peacock, W.H., 1971. Test procedures for measuring soil liquefaction characteristics. J. Soil
Mech. Found. Div., ASCE 97, 10991119.
Thiers, G.R., Seed, H.B., 1968. Cyclic stressstrain characteristics of clay. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div.,
ASCE 94, 558569.
Thiers, G.R., Seed, H.B., 1968. Strength and stress-strain characteristics of clays subjected to seismic
loading conditions. Vibration Effects of Earthquakes on Soils and Foundations, ASTM STP 450.
Wood, D.M., 1980. Laboratory investigation of the behaviour of soils under cyclic loading. In: Soil
MechanicsTransient and Cyclic Loads. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 269277.
Wilson, N.E., Greenwood, J.R., 1974. Pore pressures and strains after repeated loading of saturated clay.
Canadian Geotechnical Journal 11, 269277.
Yasuhara, K., Yamanouchi, T., Hirao, K., 1982. Cyclic strength and deformation of normally consolidated
clay. Soils and Foundations, Japan 22, 118.
Yasuhara, K., Hirao, K., Hyde, A.F.L., 1992. Effect of cyclic loading on undrained strength and compress-
ibility of clay. Soils and Foundations 32, 100116.
Yamanouchi, T., Yasuhara, K., 1975. Settlement of clay sub grades after opening trafc. In: Proceeding
of 2nd Australia and New Zealand Conference on Geomechanics, Australia,, pp. 115120.