Journal of Network & Information Security 4:4 (2013) 265273

User Acceptance of Groupon Information Technology: An

Empirical Analysis

Yanlin ZHANG

, Hui ZHU, Hongwei LIU, Zan MO

School of Management, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China
Abstract
Groupon is rising as a new kind of Electronic Commerce (EC) model with distinction from traditional
fashion. The groupon sites work as third parties bring online consumers and oine merchants together,
moving forward the promotion through public praise. This paper aims to extend Gefens theory of
Technology Acceptance Model (Trust and TAM in online shopping) to reveal the relationship between
sites, merchants and consumers. In the proposed model, eects of businessman brand and groupon sites,
consumers trust and the ability of community message senders are considered. The experiment was
performed by the survey from 208 college students. Results show that businessman brand and groupon
sites quality have positive correlation with the trust of customers. This conclusion will provide decision
support to improve consumers willingness to join online groupon for business enterprises.
Keywords: Goupon; Web Site Quality; Businessman Brand
1 Introduction
Since Groupon Co.founded 2008 in Chicago, it launched the new-style model of group-buying,
leading a large number of e-commerce websites to follow it and making this new model go through-
out the world [1]. Only in July in 2010, the visits to groupon websites in China have achieved to
46,258,000, accounting for 19.3% of total visits to shopping sites in a month [2].
As a newest way to shop online, groupon is a new type of C2B (Consumer to Business) model,
and it is a business activity that a number of people sign up to buy something with a very low
discount together, once they get the information via internet[3].
There are many researches towards the user technology acceptance and willingness to accept
online shopping [4, 5, 6, 7]. However, the researches in the past only consider consumers trust
towards businessman brand, seldom involves with the third party (that is web site qualities)
[8]. Besides, groupon combine dierent guests into a group, making it more relative between

This work is supported by by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant (NO.70971027,
71171062), Philosophy and Social Science of Guangdong under Grant (NO.GD12CGL12), and Doctors Funding
of Guangdong University of Technology (NO.12ZS0121).

Corresponding author.
Email address: forestgdut@163.com (Yanlin ZHANG).
2160-9462 / Copyright 2013 Binary Information Press
September 15, 2013
266 Y. Zhang et al. / Journal of Network & Information Security 4:4 (2013) 265273
customers [9, 10]. It is not clear that how the relationship between consumers interactional aect
compliance intention of groupon. Thus, this paper aims to analyze the reasons, which the qualities
of the websites, the businessman brand and interaction between consumers,aect the willingness
to customers.
The structure of the paper as follows: rstly we will conclude the essays in the past and
build our study model. Secondly, we will describe the procedure of the research and the data
analysis. Lastly, we will give out the valuable main result, including their meaning and the
valuable signicance in the theory and practice eld.
2 Theoretical Framework and Hypotheses
2.1 Based model
Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are important factors that user accepts the tech-
nology [6, 7]. Shopping based on line make the consumers do not do trade with them face to face.
Thus, trust is regard as a key point to maintain an ongoing relationship between the parties to
the transaction [5, 11, 12].
Gefen et al.(2003) is selected because it has a concise structure and is the most commonly
used model in the IT acceptance literatureand many studies have shown that Trust and TAM is
eective. Although the UTAUT include more elements [4], it is not selected for the reasons that
it involves a number of elements, which could make our full model overcomplicatedand does not
help us to express the relationship between the factors [13].
Group-on not only has the features of common online shopping, but also the unique features of
groupon shopping [14, 15]. Groupon make the consumers get together voluntarily with the same
requirement, for which formed a buyers advantage based on bulk purchase to buy the goods with
relative low discount [16].
Web site quality, which is an asset with premium value, brought to the owner [17]. Its carrier
is a group of the name, term, symbol or other decision used to compete with other products
and work, do aect consumers trust. The source of value added is from consumers minds in the
form of impression on their carrier [18]. The famous website is much more reliable than common
website, and the famous brand win more trust [8]. Thus, both the web site qualities and the
brand are related to the willingness to buy.
Besides, groupon combine dierent consumers into a group, making it more relative between
customers, interaction between the consumers is displayed by the professional competence of
message senders and the tie strength [19], to aect the compliance intention of groupon [20].
Professional competence referred here is that built in the base of the knowledge on the word-of-
mouth receivers, judged by the receivers experience and information about the products. And
the tie strength is described as a natural relationship from strong to weak between consumers
and others [21].
In conclusion, the research in this paper is focus on the relationship between the trust and
the web site qualities, and the trust and the businessman brand, which aect the willingness to
the consumers. Besides, the professional competence and tie strength of senders between the
consumers will be a quantitative governing between trust and compliance intention of groupon
willingness in the research.
Y. Zhang et al. / Journal of Network & Information Security 4:4 (2013) 265273 267
2.2 Hypotheses Development
2.2.1 Web site quality of groupon and trust
Compare to the tradition productions, Web Site Quality is more based on the brand prestige.
Having a well-known web site brand, the business can actually attract more costumers [8]. A
well-known brand can attract the costumers by giving deeply impression if they are confused
by the too many web sites when they are purchasing by Internet. On the other hand, for the
costumers, the well-known brand can provide more trust to let them feel that this web site can
sent productions on time and provide reliable information security and so on [12, 18]. By the
data statistics of Chinese E-Business Research Centre, the good word-of-mouth marketing, well-
known brand and the large scale decide the market share. So that this article belief that the great
brand can more easily obtain trust and get a large market share. Hence, this research put up the
assumption follow:
H1: The web site quality is positively related to users trust.
2.2.2 Businessman brand and trust
As a combination method of online and oine, in addition to quality of the groupon web site
itself, the businessman brand is also an important factor aecting consumers trust and con-
dence. Especially many dierent quality in the groupon web site, most costumers judge further to
determine by businessman brand [22] and the great brand in oine can obtain online consumers
trust more easily. Hence, this research put up the assumption follow:
H2: The businessman brand is positively related to users trust.
2.2.3 Tie strength have a regulating relationship between trust and compliance
intention of groupon
Many researches conrm that the one that have higher tie strength provide better information
dissemination eect than the lower one [21]. The tie strength between information senders and
receivers decide the eect. When the receivers belief the senders have aver all character (high
tie strength), information have a better eect in persuading [23]. Then, in the high tie strength
condition, information can be more easily to accept and have a larger inuence so that enriching
the understanding of this brand and reducing the risk of groupon. Hence, this research put up
the assumption follow:
H3: Tie strength positively moderates (reinforces) the positive relationship between trust and
intentions to groupon.
2.2.4 Professional competence of information senders have a regulating relationship
between trust and compliance intention of groupon
In the research, the information from someone with professional competence will play a role part
in select what to buy [21]. More professional this type of person is, the more information wants
to obtain from them and the dependency of word-of-mouth will increase, too. If the source of the
information is opinion leader, the inuence will be more large [24]. Therefore, the professional
268 Y. Zhang et al. / Journal of Network & Information Security 4:4 (2013) 265273
competence has a positive eect on inuence and the trust for costumers to buy productions.
Hence, this research put up the assumption follow:
H4: The professional competence of information senders positively moderates the positive re-
lationship between trust and intentions to groupon.
Having described the proposed research model, Figure 1 provides a graphical presentation.
Fig.1 Research Model and Proposed Hypotheses
3 Research Method
A survey instrument was developed to test the research model. We drew a representative sample
of Chinese Groupon users and conducted a survey.
3.1 Measures
We used validated scales to measure the constructs of the proposed model, with the wording of
the items adapted to the groupon context. Eight re?ective constructs were measured in this study.
The scales of groupon intention, trust, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, both of
which contained four items, were adapted from a study of Gefen et al. (2003), which were adapted
from Davis (1989). Web site qualitywhich adapted from Sultan et al (2002); Larson(1992). Busi-
nessman brand, which adapted from Erdem and Swait(1998); Grewal et al. (1998). Tie Strength,
which adapted from Brown and Reingen (1987). Professional competence, which adapted from
MitchellBoustani (1994).
The questionnaires mainly use ve-point Likert semantic dierential scale, and options of the
questionnaire range from totally agree to totally disagree.
3.2 Data Collection
Collects data by questionnaire and mainly study for the groupon web sites in China while the
object of study is ones who have ever purchased by groupon, most of them are the students
Y. Zhang et al. / Journal of Network & Information Security 4:4 (2013) 265273 269
of university. We chose college students as object of study because, according to iResearch
Consulting released the China Buying Online Market Research Report shows that groupon
site user to focus more on oce workers and college students, and the share of the proportion
of nearly 50%. Therefore, groupon became the main costume way of university students, so the
college students as the survey sample to a certain extent, can be representative of the population.
An English questionnaire was developed and translated it into Chinese. Following the con-
ventional back-translation method [25], we asked a translator who was unaware of the research
context to translate the Chinese version back into English. The two English questionnaires were
compared and changes were made to ensure that the Chinese version was equivalent to the original
English questionnaire [13].
The collecting time of the questionnaires is from 10th April to 10th May in 2011. Of the
250 questionnaires distributed, 208 questionnaires were completed and usable for data analysis,
showing an eective response rate of 83%.
In perspective of the way to obtain information, the search engines accounted for 41.35%,
indicating that most of the consumers prefer to rely on searching goods by search engines, other
way of community information sharing, accounted for 36.06%, indicating that most consumers
will share product information with others. Whats more, most costumers select LaShou.com,
and MeiTuan.com, and people are likely to choose food commodities on the groupon web site.
4 Data Analysis and Results
We used partial least squares (PLS) to test the research model and the structural relationships
proposed in Figure 1. PLS employs a component-based approach for model estimation, and is
not highly demanding on sample size and residual distribution [26]. SmartPLS 2.0 was chosen
because of its robustness with regard to assumptions and requirements for data analysis [27].
4.1 Measurement reliability and validity
We estimated the quality of our measurement models with composite reliability and both con-
vergent and discriminant validity.
4.1.1 Composite reliability
The reliability of the measurements was evaluated using Cronbachs alpha and the composite
reliability scores. The reliability scores of all of the principal constructs are considered adequate
as they exceed 0.72, well above the recommended cuto of 0.70 [28].
4.1.2 Convergent and discriminant validity
The convergent and discriminant validity of the measurements were con?rmed by three tests.
First, the square root of the average variance extracted (AVE) of each construct is much larger
than all cross-correlations between the construct and other constructs [26]. Second, all AVEs
are well above 0.50, which suggests that the principal constructs capture much higher construct-
related variance than error variance [29]. Third, the correlations among all of the constructs are
270 Y. Zhang et al. / Journal of Network & Information Security 4:4 (2013) 265273
well below the 0.90 threshold, suggesting that the constructs are distinct from each other [30].
Jointly, these tests suggest adequate convergent and discriminant validity of the measurements
[13].
Table 1: Construct Reliability, AVE, and Correlations
Construct
Cronbachs
alpha
Composite
reliability
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1.Professional Competence 0.77 0.87 0.83
2.Trust 0.78 0.83 0.30 0.79
3.Tie Strength 0.90 0.93 0.48 0.25 0.85
4.Businessman brand 0.81 0.86 0.48 0.30 0.38 0.72
5.Intention of groupon 0.90 0.85 0.44 0.37 0.37 0.32 0.81
6.perceived ease of use 0.72 0.85 0.47 0.40 0.32 0.37 0.42 0.78
7.perceived usefulness 0.74 0.82 0.37 0.45 0.30 0.43 0.38 0.43 0.79
8.Web site quality 0.76 0.85 0.28 0.25 0.15 0.48 0.33 0.27 0.24 0.77
Notes: The diagonal elements (in bold) are square roots of AVE.
4.2 Structural model test and results
The result is running out from the Smart PLS structured mode in Figure 2. The study indicates
that the strength rate of whole mode result is 0.37. Figure 2 shows the evaluation results of
Fig.2 PLS Results of Structural Model
the full search model. This model accounts for 37.3% of the variance in compliance intention of
groupon, which is 23.3% more than that explained by the base model. Tie strength and profes-
sional competence of information senders both have insignicant paths to compliance intention
of grouponfailing to support H3 and H4. Hypotheses H1 and H2 are supported because the
paths from Web site quality and Businessman brand to trust have signicant coecient. This
shows that the site quality indirectly aected compliance intention of groupon by the perception
of trustand businessman brand also indirectly aected compliance intention of groupon by the
perception of trust.
Y. Zhang et al. / Journal of Network & Information Security 4:4 (2013) 265273 271
5 Discussion
5.1 Key ndings and contributions
Based on the model of Gefen et al., (2003), this essay put forward the groupon acceptance model
and conducts a questionnaire survey .The Conclusions are as follows:
Conclusion 1: The more highly perceive the web site quality, the more faith will customers have
in group purchase. Therefore, cooperating with popular groupon websites helps to increase sales
and strengthen customers willness to group purchase.
Conclusion 2: If the brands get much more recognition, customers will have more condence in
their group-purchasing activities. It means the great brand in oine can obtain online consumers
trust more easily.
H3 and H4 may be due to the limitations of the participants involved. Most of them just
participate in group purchase once time and really dont know whether the relation strength and
information senders abilities can help. Whats more, the lack of questionnaires will also change
the results. Meantime, it illustrates that customers trust is crucial to group purchase since the
tie strength and professional competence of information sender have little inuence on customers
trust and their choice.
5.2 Implications for theory and research
This paper aims to delineate a theory for technology acceptance model, using Gefen et al., (2003)
as its basic theory, and combining with the three characteristics of groupon website, businessman
brand and groupon consumers, put forward that the website quality and oine businessman
brand can aect the consumers perception trust. Besides, combining with interaction between
the consumers, put forward that tie strength and professional competence of information sender
have a positive regulation to consumers trust. Empirical results show that groupon web site
quality and oine businessman brand have positive impact on the consumers willingness, and
provide some signicance to the development of groupon.
5.3 Limitations and future research
This study has some values in theoretic and practical aspects, however, the study has some
disadvantages due to various reasons, such as shortness in time, energy, studying environment,
which limited this article. Thus, we need to do further research to form a more convincing system;
some advices and solutions are simply summarized as follows:
(1)In the perspective of the object and scope in this study, this investigation is mainly base on
customers who are in school because of conditions and time constraints, which leads to a problem
in a sample survey, the amount and scope of those students consumers are certain restrictions,
so the result of investigation may not be representative of the overall situation of the groupon
industry.
(2) In this study, although both tie strength and professional competence of information senders
have insignicant impact to compliance intention of groupon, in reality, we discover that the tie
strength and professional competence of information senders do exactly inuence group purchase.
272 Y. Zhang et al. / Journal of Network & Information Security 4:4 (2013) 265273
We need to conduct a further investigation in the future.
References
[1] Chen T. An factorial study on the group-buying model of Groupon aecting consumers inten-
sions[J]. 2011.
[2] Zuo P, Wu Y. Business Model Research of Chinese Groupon Development[C]. IEEE, 2011.
[3] Dholakia U. How Eective are Groupon Promotions for Businesses?[J]. 2010.
[4] Venkatesh V, Morris M G, Davis G B, et al. User acceptance of information technology: Toward
a unied view[J]. MIS quarterly. 2003: 425-478.
[5] Gefen D, Karahanna E, Straub D W. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model[J].
MIS quarterly. 2003: 51-90.
[6] Davis F D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information tech-
nology[J]. MIS quarterly. 1989: 319-340.
[7] Davis F D, Bagozzi R P, Warshaw P R. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison
of Two Theoretical Models[J]. Management Science. 1989, 35(8): 982-1003.
[8] Gregg D G, Walczak S. The relationship between website quality, trust and price premiums at
online auctions[J]. Electronic Commerce Research. 2010, 10(1): 1-25.
[9] Byers J W, Mitzenmacher M, Potamias M, et al. A Month in the Life of Groupon[J]. Arxiv preprint
arXiv:1105.0903. 2011.
[10] Edelman B, Jae S, Kominers S D, et al. To Groupon or not to Groupon: The protability of
deep discounts[M]. Harvard Business School, 2010.
[11] Corbitt B J, Thanasankit T, Yi H. Trust and e-commerce: a study of consumer perceptions[J].
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. 2003, 2(3): 203-215.
[12] Martn S S, Camarero C. Consumer Trust to a Web Site: Moderating Eect of Attitudes toward
Online Shopping.[J]. CyberPsychology and Behavior. 2008, 11(5): 549-554.
[13] Xue Y, Liang H, Wu L. Punishment, Justice, and Compliance in Mandatory IT Settings[J]. Infor-
mation Systems Research. 2011, 22(2): 400-414.
[14] Arabshahi A. Undressing groupon: An analysis of the groupon business model[Z]. Mimeo, 2010.
[15] Anand K S, Aron R. Group buying on the web: A comparison of price-discovery mechanisms[J].
Management Science. 2003: 1546-1562.
[16] Xu F. A comparative study of online group-coupon sale in USA and China[C]. IEEE, 2011.
[17] Kuan H H, Bock G W, Vathanophas V. Comparing the eects of website quality on customer
initial purchase and continued purchase at e-commerce websites[J]. Behaviour and Information
Technology. 2008, 27(1): 3-16.
[18] Wells J D, Valacich J S, Hess T J. What signal are you sending? how website quality inuences
perceptions of product quality and purchase intentions[J]. MIS Quarterly. 2011, 35(2): 373-396.
[19] Goldenberg J, Libai B, Muller E. Talk of the network: A complex systems look at the underlying
process of word-of-mouth[J]. Marketing letters. 2001, 12(3): 211-223.
[20] Ming-Shen W, Chih-Chung C, Su-Chao C, et al. Eects of Online Shopping Attitudes, Subjec-
tive Norms and Control Beliefs on Online Shopping IntentionsA Test of the Theory of Planned
Behaviour.[J]. International Journal of Management. 2007, 24(2): 296-302.
[21] Bansal H S, Voyer P A. Word-of-mouth processes within a services purchase decision context[J].
Journal of service research. 2000, 3(2): 166-177.
Y. Zhang et al. / Journal of Network & Information Security 4:4 (2013) 265273 273
[22] Wen-Yeh H, Schrank H, Dubinsky A J. Eect of brand name on consumers risk perceptions of
online shopping.[J]. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 2004, 4(1): 40-50.
[23] Brown J J, Reingen P H. Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior[J]. Journal of Consumer
Research.1987: 350-362.
[24] Money R B, Gilly M C, Graham J L. Explorations of national culture and word-of-mouth referral
behavior in the purchase of industrial services in the United States and Japan[J]. The Journal of
Marketing. 1998: 76-87.
[25] Brislin R. Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials[J]. H. Triandis, J. Berry,
eds. Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology. Ally nand Bacon, Boston. 1980: 389-444.
[26] Chin W W. Commentary: Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling[J]. MIS Quarterly.
1998, 22(1): vii-xvi.
[27] Ringle C M, Wende S, Will A. Customer segmentation with FIMIX-PLS[J]. PLS and Related
MethodsCProceedings of the PLS. 2005, 5: 507-514.
[28] Nunnally J C. Psychometric Theory[M]. 2nd ed ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
[29] Hair J F, Anderson R E, Tatham R L, et al. Multivariate Data Analysis[M]. Englewood Clis, NJ:
Prentice Hall, 1998.
[30] Bagozzi R P, Yi Y, Phillips L W. Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research[J].
Administrative Science Quarterly. 1991, 36(3): 421-458.