Judges: Please mark the appropriate score [0, ..., 10] in the corresponding category in the blank provided on the left. Then, sum the left column. Each section has only one score [0, ..., 10]. Please add comments on back.
Section/Score Category 0 1 ( Very Poor) 2 3 (Poor) 4 5 6 (Acceptable) 7 8 (Very Good) 9 10 (Exceptional) Introduction Goals/Purpose Not stated Not relevant Moderately relevant Relevant Extremely relevant Hypothesis Unclear Questionable Somewhat logical Logical Clear & concise Score: _______ Background Information Minimal Not relevant Moderately relevant Sufficient Relevant & summarized well Methodology Methodology Not presented Not relevant Moderately relevant Relevant Extremely relevant Score: _______ Experimental Design Not presented Poor design Moderate design Sufficient design Exceptional design Results & Conclusion Data Presented to Support Hypothesis/Goals Misleading Not enough Adequate Substantial amount, clearly addressed Exceptional Conclusion Misleading Unclear Adequate Presented in a logical sequence Clear, relevant, & logically presented Score: _______ Practical Implications None Unclear Expected Substantial Highly practical & supported by findings Knowledge Score: _______ Answering Judges' Questions Not able to Difficulty Answers some questions Answers most Answers all clearly & thoroughly Oral Presentation Delivery-Reading from slides/notes Constantly Mostly Sometimes Little Never Mannerisms Very Poor Poor Acceptable Good Exceptional Time Management Very poor Poor Acceptable Good Exceptional Score: _______ Clearness Confusing Unclear Acceptable Good Exceptional Student Research Week 2014 Oral Presentation: Judges Score Sheet Judges: Please mark the appropriate score [0, ..., 10] in the corresponding category in the blank provided on the left. Then, sum the left column. Each section has only one score [0, ..., 10]. Please add comments on back.