0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
22 vues2 pages
This document summarizes the results of a Matlab simulation of transient 2D heat conduction through a 3cm x 3cm metal slab. The simulation was run with a convective heat transfer coefficient of 10,000 W/(m2*k) and a fluid temperature of 20 degrees Celsius. Part A used adiabatic top and bottom boundaries and a left boundary held at 200C, showing unreliable uniform temperature results. Part B used a smaller time step of .0042 seconds, showing more reliable varying temperature distributions. Part C found steady state was reached at 24.6 seconds when the temperature change was less than .0001 per time step.
This document summarizes the results of a Matlab simulation of transient 2D heat conduction through a 3cm x 3cm metal slab. The simulation was run with a convective heat transfer coefficient of 10,000 W/(m2*k) and a fluid temperature of 20 degrees Celsius. Part A used adiabatic top and bottom boundaries and a left boundary held at 200C, showing unreliable uniform temperature results. Part B used a smaller time step of .0042 seconds, showing more reliable varying temperature distributions. Part C found steady state was reached at 24.6 seconds when the temperature change was less than .0001 per time step.
This document summarizes the results of a Matlab simulation of transient 2D heat conduction through a 3cm x 3cm metal slab. The simulation was run with a convective heat transfer coefficient of 10,000 W/(m2*k) and a fluid temperature of 20 degrees Celsius. Part A used adiabatic top and bottom boundaries and a left boundary held at 200C, showing unreliable uniform temperature results. Part B used a smaller time step of .0042 seconds, showing more reliable varying temperature distributions. Part C found steady state was reached at 24.6 seconds when the temperature change was less than .0001 per time step.
This problem requires us to look at the transient conduction through a 3cm x 3cm slab of metal using Matlab. For each of the parts a-e I created a surface temperature distribution chart and center temperature profile charts along both x and y. The convective heat transfer coefficient used is 10,000 W/(m 2 *k) and the fluid temperature is 20 degrees Celsius. Part A: Reference Case The top and bottom are both adiabatic and the left is held at a constant 200 degrees.
The temperature distribution graph shows a constant 20C through the whole slab except the left because it is held at 200C. This data is not very reliable.
Part B: Time Step Comparison The time step used is .0042 seconds instead of 1 second. These results are much more reliable than that in part A. There is actual temperature variation in these charts instead of showing the whole slab as one temperature.
ME 314 HW 6 231 Part C: Steady State It takes 24.6 seconds to reach steady state when dT is defined as .0001 for a single time step. There are only small differences between this temperature distribution plot and the one found in part B. Overall this is a warmer plot.
Part D: Temperature over time Tmax = 25, T = 5, 6.25, 8.33, 12.5, 25
Part E: Generation q = 50W. Tmax = 200.11 C and is located at x = 0.0015.