Submitted to: Mr. Gokarna Awasthi Subject Instructor International Business
Prepared by: Mukunda Bhattarai 2012-MBA-515 Roll No.: 013, KOHINOOR
Apex College Mid Baneshwor, Kathmandu, Nepal January 3, 2014 WTO in Nepal: Opportunity or Threats? 1. Background Nepal accelerated economic reform programs in the early 1990s with the adoption of liberal and market oriented policies. The reform measures have covered almost all sectors of the economy including trade and investment sector. However, the trade performance has not been satisfactory so far. Trade deficit increased in the 1990s to 18.3 percent of GDP as compared to 13 percent of 1980s (NDF 2004). Similarly, despite the various policy initiatives to boost FDI inflows, Nepal could not attract substantial investment during that period. Nepal's foreign trade is heavily reliant on India. Similarly, as a land-locked country we have to rely on India to get access to the rest of the world. Transit route via China is neither convenient nor cost- effective. Bilateral treaties and friendly relations manage trade and transit between Nepal and India. Nepal had to face extreme economic difficulties whenever bilateral relations were not satisfactory. For example, India's trade embargo of 1988/89 was very costly both to the economy and the government that inspired Nepal to be a member of multilateral trading system. Nepal has a very low industrial base, that can be explained by increasing trade deficit during 1980s and the 90s. Likewise, Nepal's trade is not diversified. For example, 90 percent of Nepal's total export is concentrated on India, USA and Germany. Trade is not diversified both in terms of market and the product. A large chunk of exports (about 50 percent) depends on carpets, readymade garments and woolens. 2. How Nepal become WTO member? (Accession Process) Nepal had applied for GATT membership for the first time in 1989. It obtained an observer status in 1995 and submitted the memorandum on Foreign Trade Regime in July 1998. The first meeting of the working party for Nepal's membership was held in May 2000 in Geneva. The second meeting was held in September 2002 in the same place. The third meeting held in August 2003, gave final shape for Nepal's membership. The fifth Ministerial Conference at Cancun, Mexico approved Nepal's membership package on 11th September 2003. Consequently after the government's approval on April 23, 2004, Nepal became a fully fledge WTO member. In this way Nepal became the first LDC to obtain WTO membership by accession after almost fifteen year's efforts. In the course of accession process Nepal had to furnish answers to a large number of questions and queries. Similarly, bilateral negotiations were held with a number of countries. Nepal has made commitments to a number of areas while negotiating for the membership. Nepal has secured the rights to protect cottage industries and to provide export subsidies. It also has a right to grant subsidies up to 10 percent to agriculture sector. 3. Impact of Entry The impact of multilateral agreements on member countries economy depends on the types of provisions and the level of implementation of such provisions. It is too early to evaluate the impact of Nepal's entry into the WTO since it has recently became a fully fledge member. However, counterfactuals of membership and ex-ante evaluation of Nepal's entry can be carried out with the help of extrapolations of such provisions and agreements. Sector-wise effects of such provisions, in general, can be stated as following: 3.1 National Economy The economic reform process of 1980s got momentum in the 1990s. Nepal initiated economic reforms process in industry, trade, finance, foreign exchange, foreign investment etc even before the Uruguay Rounds. A study recently carried out but by the International Monetary Fund has shown that Nepal is a leading liberalized country with 2 points where the countries in the world are graded with 1 to 10 points. Therefore, Nepal's entry into the WTO will not have significant impact on the direction of national economy. 3.2 Government Revenue One of the basic functions of the WTO is to liberalize trade and conduct world trade according to multilaterally agreed rules. This requires the member countries to reduce tariff rates in accordance with their commitments and provisions of multilateral trading agreements. On the other hand the member countries can protect their industries with nothing but tariffs. In a country like Nepal, where commodity taxes play vital role in revenue mobilization, is bound to have a considerable pressure on government revenue mobilization. However, commodity taxes based on foreign trade are already low in Nepal. There is a possibility even to raise binding ceilings of such taxes. Viewed from these perspectives, Nepal may not have such a huge fiscal pressure to comply WTO rules and provisions. 3.3 Agriculture The Agreement on Agriculture has become one of the most contentious issues of WTO. The agenda on agriculture have been creating havoc in WTO meetings and conferences for a long time. It was one of the main causes of Cancun debacle. The agreement requires heavy reduction on domestic support and export subsidies on agriculture from industrial and developed countries. 3.4 Trade and Industry There are several agreements in WTO concerning trade and industry sector. Tariff, antidumping and safeguards measures have allowed substantial dispersion of protection in many countries. Similarly, as stated above, the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures allows export subsidies to the countries with per-capita income less than US $ 1000. However, experience has shown that there is not much prospect of using such subsidies to gain competitive advantage vis--vis industrial countries. 4. SWOT Analysis Nepal's entry into WTO has the following strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. 4.1 Strengths Liberalized economy is the main strength of Nepal. As stated earlier Nepal initiated a sweeping economic reform programs after the restoration of democracy in 1991. Entry for foreign investment was substantially simplified. The reforms covered almost all sectors of the economy including trade, investment and finance. Before liberalization Nepal's trade regime was characterized by high tariffs, quantitative restrictions, import licensing system and control of foreign exchange transactions that is now liberalized. This helped Nepal obtaining WTO membership and, is expected to help in fulfilling commitments of membership package. Nepal has a number of other strengths as well. 4.2 Weaknesses No doubt, WTO offers tremendous opportunities and benefits to its members. However, the experience has shown that LDCs are not able to materialize such opportunities and benefits due to four main reasons. Firstly, they are marked with their inherent structural or supply-side constraints. Secondly, the institutional weaknesses of WTO impede the LDCs form acquiring its potential benefits. Thirdly, frequent non-compliance of WTO provisions has been noticed from the influential WTO members. Similarly, non-cooperation and short-term self-interest of some of the players of global governance has hindered LDCs from materializing the provisions and opportunities which are being offered by WTO. Nepal has inherent domestic weaknesses like bureau pathology, poor infrastructure, lack of competitiveness, under-developed capital and money market, lack of well-developed and strong private sector, lack of effective regulatory framework, low level of human capital and lack of sound business environment etc. Similarly, transport cost is very high in Nepal. Political instability has significantly low level of predictability in governance. 4.3 Opportunities Nepal's entry into WTO has reduced and even avoided in some cases, the cost of non-membership. A large share of international trade (more than 90 percent) takes place among WTO members. Nepal's major trading partners and neighboring countries are its members, In this situation remaining aloof or outside the system might pose high cost to the economy. Nepal's entry into WTO is expected to have increased benefits to the consumers due to cheaper import, sustained increase in volume of export spurred by predictable access to foreign markets and the possibility of attracting foreign direct investment. The standard of living is expected to improve with an increase in economic growth through massive expansion of commercial activities within and outside the country. It offers expanded market for Nepalese exports. It also helps to expand and diversify exports as it provides a secure and predictable trading environment. There is a high possibility of foreign direct investment inflow in the country under transparent and predictable trading environment. Nepal, being one of LDC, can enjoy special provisions, benefits, concessions and facilities of WTO. Similarly, she can obtain technical assistance from developed countries. As mentioned earlier, there are a number of special provisions of positive discrimination in favor of LDCs. The participation in WTO can also relieve LDCs like Nepal from the scourge of periodical renewal of bilateral trade agreement.
4.4 Threats There are three major threats to LDCs from WTO membership. Firstly, there is a possibility of marginalization of weaker economies. Secondly, it may cause global exploitation and widen inequality both at national as well as global level. Similarly, survival itself is challenging to LDCs in absence of resources, and knowledge-base since there is hardly a level playing field in WTO. WTO membership creates erosion on flexibility of policy discretion. Policy makers have less freedom in selecting policy options because of the excessive policy prescriptions of multilateral financial institutions like the World Bank, IMF and WTO. Similarly, there is an erosion of the margin of preferences Nepal was enjoying under various bilateral and multilateral agreements. After the transition period of the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing, which ends by the end of December 2004, Nepal's major export sector, carpet and readymade garments will have to face serious threats. Meeting additional costs for compliance of WTO commitments as well as the increased cost for participation is significantly high. It will definitely create pressure on budget allocation. There is a danger of dumping Indian goods in Nepal. Similarly, elimination of subsidies and other preferences may increase food prices that hits hard to the general public. The agriculture sector will also be in trouble when the government takes its hands off from this sector in the name of redefining and relocating the role and scope of the government. 5. Conclusion WTO is undeniably a major player in the field of global economic governance. It has integrated the world economy very fast by creating greater degree of interdependence among the nation states in all economic spheres of life. No doubt, WTO membership offers a large number of opportunities to the least developed countries like Nepal. However, benefits do not derive automatically. It requires ability to tap opportunities. Benefits of WTO so far have been confined to industrialized countries and a few large and influential developing countries. Similarly, the cost and challenges of membership are immediate whereas opportunities and benefits are only prospective. However, Nepal does not have any alternative to WTO membership. The only option is to streamline opportunities and benefits and minimize risks and threats. This requires turning participation into influence.