Process Responsibility :-

Drg. Rev. No./Date:

Mr. Prem Kumar, Mr. B.S Verma, Mr. M.Mishra, Adesh Kumar, Puneet, Parveen goyal Key Date :-
O
c
c
u
r
a
n
c
e
CURRENT
PROCESS
CONTROL
PREVENTION
CURRENT PROCESS
CONTROL
DETECTION
Area/Person
Responsible &
completion date
Action(s)
Taken &
effective date S
e
v
e
r
i
t
y
O
c
c
u
r
a
n
c
e
D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
R
P
N
10 (MPI
Crack
Detection)
MPI
Machine
Crack
Customer
Dissatisfaction,
Field Failure
9
ImProper Inspection
by Supplier
3
Instruction given to
the supplier
regarding 100%
MPI
100% Visual Inspection
at final Stage
3 81
Chemical
Composition will not
meet customer Req.
Customer
Dissatisfaction
6
ImProper
Inspection/ Wrong
material supplied
by the Supplier
3
WI For Incoming
Material Inspection/
Mill TC
MTC/ Incoming
inspection
5 90
OD O/S
More Tool Wear/
Rework
4 3 3 36
OD U/S
Material unclean /
Reject
4 3 3 36
BEND
COULD NOT
LOAD AT
TRAUB/Reject
5 4 3 60
PITTING MARKS Rejected/ Rework 4 3 3 36
Colour Code
Mixing Of the
Material/
Customer
Dissatisfaction
4
Unaware of
requirements
4
Instruction given to
the supplier
regarding color code
3 48
QTY / WT.
SCHEDULE
WILL NOT
MEET/ Customer
Dissatisfaction
4 ImProper Inspection 3
Challan/ Training
given to the
inspector
INCOMING
INSPECTION /Receipt
Inspection
3 36
Criteria Symbol Rev.#
Critical 1
Major
Minor
Part or
Function
(
2
0
)

R
a
w

M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l

I
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
Process
Requireme
nts
R
a
w

M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS
(PROCESS FMEA) PFMEA : AMT/FMEA/2300
Item :- PIN Blank Puneet Sharma FMEA Rev. No. : 01
Prep. By : Parveen goyal
Core Team :-
Drawing No.:
05/15/13 FMEA Rev.Date :- 12.08.2013
G-02-860 Page : 1 of 1
Potential Failure
Mode
Potential Effect(s)
of the Failure
S
e
v
e
r
i
t
y
Current Process
D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
Opeartion :- Raw Material Inspection 06/30.06.2012
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
R
P
N
Process Reviwed
Description
Parveen goyal 12.08.2013
Action Root Cause Rev. By. Date
Action Results
Recommended
Action(s)
Potential Cause(s) of
the Failure
Traning Given to the
inspector/ Process
Sheet for inspection
Work Instruction
given to the workers
SIZE VARIATION
IN RAW MATERIAL
FROM Supplier
STORAGE &
HANDLLING
PROBLEM
INCOMING
INSPECTION
Process Responsibility :-
Drg. Rev. No./Date:
Key Date :-
O
c c u r a n c eCURRENT
PROCESS
CONTROL
PREVENTION
CURRENT PROCESS
CONTROL
DETECTION
Area/Person
Responsible &
completion
date
Action(s)
Taken &
effective date S e v e r i t y
O
c c u r a n c e
D
e t e c t i o n
R
P
N
Length
U/S
Rejected/ Material
Unclean
5
Improper
Setting
4
First 5 pcs. Setup
Approval
Hourly inspection Report 4 80
Length
O/S
Tool breakage
problem/ Rejected
/Rework
More Tool Wear
out
5
Improper
Setting/ Tool
Wear out
4
Proper Setting of
band saw
First 5 pcs.
Approval/ Instruct
to follow tool
change Freq.
Hourly inspection
Report/ Tool Change
history card
4 80
ID U/S
Rejected/Rework
Tool breakage
problem
More Tool wear
5
* Wrong
Setting
*Tool wear out
4
first Piece
approval Report
Training to
Supervisor &
Operator/ Instruct
to follow tool
change Freq.
Hourly inspection
Report/ Tool Change
history card
4 80
ID O/S
Rejected
Material Unclean
5
* Improper
Setting
4
first Piece
approval Report
Training to
Supervisor &
Operator
Hourly inspection Report 4 80
OD Chamfer
Length O/S
Tool breakage
problem
Problem in next
operation/
Rejected
4
* Wrong
Setting
3
first Piece
approval Report
Training to
Supervisor
Hourly inspection Report 4 48
OD Chamfer
Length U/S
Rejected/
rework/ Problem in
next opeartion
4
* Wrong
Setting
* Tool wear out
3
first Piece
approval Report
Training to
Supervisor
Instruct to tool
change Freq.
Hourly inspection
Report/ Tool Change
History Card
4 48
Chf. Angle
O/S
Material Unclean/
Rejected/ Rework
4 Wrong Setting 3
first Piece
approval Report
Training to
Supervisor &
Operator
Hourly inspection Report 4 48
Chf. Angle
U/S
more Tool Wear/
Rejected/ Rework
4
Wrong Setting /
Tool Wear Out
3
first Piece
approval Report
Training to
Supervisor &
Operator/ Instruct
to follow tool
change Freq.
Hourly inspection
Report/ Tool Change
history card
4 48
ID U/S
Rejected/ Rework
Tool breakage
problem
5
* Wrong
Setting
* Tool wear out
4
first Piece
approval Report
Training to
Supervisor &
Operator/ Instruct
to follow tool
change Freq.
Hourly inspection
Report/ Tool Change
history card
4 80
ID O/S
Rejected
Deep Lining/
Material Unclean
5 Wrong Setting 3
first Piece
approval Report
Training to
Supervisor &
Operator
Hourly inspection Report 4 60
Length
U/S
Rejected/ Material
Unclean/ Customer
Dissatisfaction
5
Improper
Setting
3
Proper Setting of
band saw
First 5 pcs.
Approval
Hourly inspection Report 4 60
Length
O/S
Tool breakage
problem
Rework
5
Improper
Setting/ Tool
Wear out
4
Proper Setting of
band saw
First 5 pcs.
Approval/
Instruction to
follow tool change
Freq.
Hourly inspection
Report/ Tool Change
history card
4 80
Taper Dia.
O/S
Rejected/ Material
unclean
5
* Wrong
Setting
4
first Piece
approval Report
Training to
Supervisor
Hourly inspection Report 4 80
Taper Dia.
U/S
Tool breakage
problem
Rework
4
* Wrong
Setting
* Tool wear out
4
first Piece
approval Report
Training to
Supervisor
instruct to follow
tool change work
instruction
Hourly inspection
Report/ Tool Change
history card
4 64
Taper Angle
O/S
Problem In Next
Operation/
Rejected/ Material
Unclean
4 Wrong Setting 3
first Piece
approval Report
Training to
Supervisor &
Operator
Hourly inspection Report 4 48
Taper Angle
U/S
Tool Breakage
Problem/ Rework
4
Wrong Setting /
Tool Wear Out
3
first Piece
approval Report
Training to
Supervisor &
Operator/ Instruct
to follow tool
change Freq.
Hourly inspection
Report/ Tool Change
history card
4 48
Taper Dia.
O/S
Rejected/ Material
unclean
5
* Wrong
Setting
4
first Piece
approval Report
Training to
Supervisor
Hourly inspection Report 4 80
Taper Dia.
U/S
Tool breakage
problem
Rework
4
* Wrong
Setting
* Tool wear out
4
first Piece
approval Report
Training to
Supervisor
instruct to follow
tool change work
instruction
Hourly inspection
Report/ Tool Change
history card
4 64
Taper Angle
O/S
Problem In Next
Operation/
Rejected/ Material
Unclean
4 Wrong Setting 3
first Piece
approval Report
Training to
Supervisor &
Operator
Hourly inspection Report 4 48
Taper Angle
U/S
Tool Breakage
Problem/ Rework
4
Wrong Setting /
Tool Wear Out
3
first Piece
approval Report
Training to
Supervisor &
Operator/ Instruct
to follow tool
change Freq.
Hourly inspection
Report/ Tool Change
history card
4 48
Length
U/S
Rejected/ Material
unclean
5 3 4 60
Length
O/S
Tool breakage
problem
More tool wear
5 3 4 60
ID O/S
Rejected/ Rework
More Tool Wear
4 4 4 64
ID U/S
Rejected
Tool breakage
problem
5 4 4 80
OD Chamfer
Length O/S
Rework/ Material
Unclean
4 3 4 48
OD Chamfer
Length U/S
Tool breakage
problem
More Tool wear
4 3 4 48
Chf. Angle
O/S
Material Unclean/
Rejected/ Rework
4 3 4 48
Chf. Angle
U/S
more Tool Wear/
Rejected/ Rework
4 3 4 48
Taper Dia.
O/S
Rejected/ Material
unclean
4 3 4 48
Taper Dia.
U/S
Tool breakage
problem
Rework
4 4 4 64
Taper Angle
O/S
Problem In Next
Operation/
Rejected/ Material
Unclean
4 4 4 64
Taper Angle
U/S
Tool Breakage
Problem/ Rework
4 3 4 48
Criteria Rev.#
Critical 1
Major
Minor
-
Process
Requirements
C
a m
S h a f t S p e e d &
S p i n d l e R
P
M
( 3 0 ) P
a r t i n g , R
o u g h I d , O
D
C
h f . ( F
i r s t S i d e )
C
a m
S h a f t S p e e d &
S p i n d l e R
P
M
( 4 0 ) T
/ L
&
R
o u g h I d ( F
i n i s h )
R
P
M
, T
o o l D
r i l l , T
o o l D
r e s s i n g F
r e q .
( 5 0 ) I D
T
a p e r ( 1 s t S i d e )
( 6 0 ) I D
T
a p e r ( 2 n d S i d e )
R
P
M
, T
o o l D
r i l l , T
o o l D
r e s s i n g F
r e q .
Drawing No.: G-02-860
D
e t e c t i o n
Potential
Failure Mode
Potential Effect(s)
of the Failure
S e v e r i t y
C
l a s s i f i c a t i o
Potential
Cause(s) of the
Failure
Part or
Functions R
P
NRecommended
Action(s)
Action Results
Root Cause
Current Process
12.08.2013 Parveen goyal
Description Action
Page : 1 of 1
Mr. Prem Kumar, Mr. B.S Verma, Mr. M.Mishra, Mr. Ashok
Rev. By. Date
Process Reviewed
Shailendar, Parveen goyal
FMEA Rev. No. : 01
Operation :- Parting, Rough ID Taper & ID 06/30.06.2012 Prep. By : Parveen goyal
Incoming Inspection
Core Team :- 05/15/13 FMEA Rev.Date :- 12.08.2013
Improper
Inspection/
wrong material
supplied by the
suppliers
Training Given to
the Inspector /
instruct operator
to check 100%
before Processing/
SPC
Training Given to
the Inspector /
instruct operator
to check 100%
before Processing ( 7 0 ) R
e c e i v i n g I n s p e c t i o n F
r o m
K
u m
a r
POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTANALYSIS
(PROCESS FMEA) PFMEA : AMT/FMEA/2300
Item :- Pin Blank Mr. Ashok Tomar
Process Responsibility :-
Drg. Rev. No./Date:
Key Date :-
O
c
c
u
r
a
n
c
e
CURRENT PROCESS
CONTROL
PREVENTION
CURRENT PROCESS
CONTROL
DETECTION
Area/Person
Responsible &
completion date
Action(s)
Taken &
effective date S
e
v
e
r
i
t
y
O
c
c
u
r
a
n
c
e
Wrinkle
Material
unclean,tolerance not
provided b/w punch and
die
5
Man power not
awareness,die and
punch defect,defect
raw sheet used
4
First piece setup
Approval,tranning
provided to operator
Hourly inspection 4 80
Compressor
Pipe is provided
to clean the
chips and dust
particles
Mr alem ,mr
jha
Breakage
Thickness variation in
sheet,
5 no reason 3
Checking 10 nos while
set up.
Hourly inspection 4 60
Short t/l
Feed length not
adjusted,eror in height of
die and punch
5 Error is punch and die 3 4 60
Increase t/l as
tolerance
Same as above 5 Same as above 3 4 60
Criteria Symbol Rev.#
Critical 1
Major
Minor
Part or
Function
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

p
r
e
s
s

d
r
a
w
F
e
e
d

l
e
n
g
t
h
,
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
,
d
i
e
,
p
u
n
c
h
,
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e

r
i
n
g
,
r
a
w

m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l

s
h
e
e
t
Process
Requirements
Page : 1 of 1
Recommended
Action(s)
Action Results Current Process
Potential Failure
Mode
Potential Effect(s) of the
Failure
Potential Cause(s) of
the Failure
G-02-860
Hourly Ispection
Opeartion :- DRAWN
Core Team :-
Drawing No.:
05.15.2013 Mr puneet sharma,mr joiginder,mr jha
D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
Prep. By : Parveen Goyal
S
e
v
e
r
i
t
y
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
R
P
N
06/30.06.2012
POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS
(PROCESS FMEA) PFMEA : AMT/FMEA/2300
Item :- MIXING JAR Mr. Ashok Kumar FMEA Rev. No. : 01
FMEA Rev.Date :- 12.08.2013
Description Action Root Cause Rev. By.
Process Has Been Reviewed
Parveen goyal 12.09.213
Process Responsibility :-
Drg. Rev. No./Date:
Key Date :-
Page : 1 of 1
G-02-860
Opeartion :- DRAWN
Core Team :-
Drawing No.:
05.15.2013 Mr puneet sharma,mr joiginder,mr jha
Prep. By : Parveen Goyal 06/30.06.2012
POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS
(PROCESS FMEA) PFMEA : AMT/FMEA/2300
Item :- MIXING JAR Mr. Ashok Kumar FMEA Rev. No. : 01
FMEA Rev.Date :- 12.08.2013
5
5
4
4
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
Criteria Symbol Rev.#
Critical 1
Major
Minor
Process Has Been Reviewed Parveen goyal
Rev. By. Root Cause
12.09.213
Action Description
D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
R
P
N
Page : 1 of 1
Action Results
Prep. By : Parveen Goyal
POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS
PFMEA : AMT/FMEA/2300
FMEA Rev. No. : 01
FMEA Rev.Date :- 12.08.2013
Date
12.09.213
Page : 1 of 1
Prep. By : Parveen Goyal
POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS
PFMEA : AMT/FMEA/2300
FMEA Rev. No. : 01
FMEA Rev.Date :- 12.08.2013
Date
12.09.213
PFMEA : AMT/FMEA/2300
Item :- Pin Blank Process Responsibility :- Mr. AmitRaj FMEA Rev. No. : 01
Opeartion :- Grinding Drg. Rev. No./Date: 06/30.06.2012 Prep. By : Parveen goyal
Core Team :- Mr. Prem Kumar, Mr. B.S Verma, Mr. M.Mishra, Mr. AmitRaj Key Date :- FMEA Rev.Date :- 12.08.2013
Adesh Kumar, Sailinder, Parveen goyal Page : 1 of 1
Drawing No.: G-02-860
O
c
c
u
r
a
n
c
e
CURRENT
PROCESS
CONTROL
PREVENTION
CURRENT PROCESS
CONTROL
DETECTION
Area/Person
Responsible
& completion
date
Action(s)
Taken &
effective
date
S
e
v
e
r
i
t
y
O
c
c
u
r
a
n
c
e
D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
R
P
N
OD U/S
REJECTED/
CREATE
FITMENT PROB.
AT CUSTOMER
END
8
SETTING
PROBLEM
5
FPA / Training
Provided to the
operator /SPC/
Process Sheet
4 160
OD O/S
REWORK /
Customer
Dissatisfaction
8
SETTING
PROBLEM/
Grinding wheel
wear
5
FPA/ DRESSING
FREQ FIXED/
SPC
4 160
GRINDING
MARKS
OD WILL BE
UNCLEAR &
Rejected AT
CUSTOMER
END
4 5 4 80
BURN MARKS
OD WILL BE
UNCLEAR &
Rejected AT
CUSTOMER END
4 5 4 80
SURFACE
ROUGHNESS
EXCESS WEAR
OF GRINDING
WHEEL
4
WHEEL
DRESSING NOT
DONE
RPM CHANGE
4
DRESSING
FREQ FIXED
RPM FIXED
5 80
Circularity O/S
OD WILL BE
UNCLEAR
4
REST BLADE
HIGHT NOT OK
5
REST BLADE
HIGHT FIXED
4 80
Criteria Rev.# Rev. By.
Dat
e
Critical 1
Major
Minor
100%
inspection by
Dial Gauge on
Grinding
D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
R
P
N Potential Failure
Mode
Potential
Effect(s) of the
Failure
S
e
v
e
r
i
t
y
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
Potential Cause(s)
of the Failure
Parveen goyal
Current Process
Recommended
Action(s)
Action Results
Description Root Cause Action
HOURLY
INSPECTION
WHEEL
DRESSING NOT
DONE
DRESSING
FREQ FIXED
12.08.2013
05/15/13
POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS
(PROCESS FMEA)
Part or
Function
(
1
2
0
)

G
r
i
n
d
i
n
g
Process
Require
ments
G
r
.

W
h
e
e
l
,

D
r
e
s
s
i
n
g

F
r
e
q
.
,

R
p
m

o
f

G
r
.

W
h
e
e
l
,

R
p
m

o
f

C
.

W
h
e
e
l
,

D
r
e
s
s
e
r
Process Has Been Reviwed
Process Responsibility :-
Drg. Rev. No./Date:
Key Date :-
O
c
c
u
r
a
n
c
e
CURRENT
PROCESS
CONTROL
PREVENTION
CURRENT PROCESS
CONTROL
DETECTION
Area/Person
Responsible &
completion
date
Action(s)
Taken &
effective date
S
e
v
e
r
i
t
y
O
c
c
u
r
a
n
c
e
D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
R
P
N
OD O/S & U/S 8 3
TRAINING Given to
INSPECTORS &
SPC
GAUGE R&R DONE
100% Visual inspection
Master sample display
4 96
CHAMFER
LENGTH O/S, U/S
8 3
100% Visual inspection
PDI
4 96
OD CHAMFER
ANGLE O/S, U/S
8 3
100% Visual inspection
PDI
4 96
ID Taper Dia
O/S U/S
4 5
Final Inspection/ 100%
Guaging of ID Taper
4 80
ID Taper Angle
O/S U/S
4 5
Final Inspection/ 100%
Guaging of ID Taper
4 80
Length O/S, U/S 8 3
TRAINING Given to
INSPECTORS &
SPC
GAUGE R&R DONE

100% gauging of
Length
4 96
Burr, Dent, Lining &
Pitted, Crack
5 4
TRAINING Given to
INSPECTORS &
SPC
Visual R&R DONE
100% Visual inspection 4 80
Criteria
Sym
bol
Rev.#
Critical 1
Major
Minor
Part or
Function
(
1
3
0
)



F
i
n
a
l

I
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n


















Proc
ess
Req.
G
a
u
g
e
s

&

I
n
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
s
Process Has Been reviwed Parveen goyal
D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
Recommended
Action(s)
Description Date
TRAINING Given to
INSPECTORS
Frequently calibration
of instrument
Potential Cause(s) of
the Failure
S
e
v
e
r
i
t
y
12.08.2013
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
Current Process
UNTRAINED/
NEGLIGENCE OF
INSPECTORS
INSPECTION
VARIATIONS
INSTRUMENTS
ERROR
Rev. By. Root Cause
G-02-860
Action
Potential Failure
Mode
Potential
Effect(s) of the
Failure
POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS
(PROCESS FMEA) PFMEA : AMT/FMEA/2300
Item :- Pin Blank
06/30.06.2012
Adesh Kumar, Sailinder, Parveen goyal
Mr. Ramesh Triphati FMEA Rev. No. : 01
FMEA Rev.Date :- 12.08.2013
Page : 1 of 1
Drawing No.:
Action Results
R
P
N
CUSTOMER
Dissatisfaction/
REJECTION
AT
CUSTOMER
END
Prep. By : Parveen goyal
Core Team :- 05/15/13 Mr. Prem Kumar, Mr. B.S Verma, Mr. M.Mishra, Mr. Ramesh Triphati
Opeartion :- Final Inspection
Process Responsibility :-
Drg. Rev. No./Date:
Mr. Prem Kumar, Mr. B.S Verma, Mr. M.Mishra, Mr. Ramesh Triphati, Parveen goyal Key Date :-
O
c
c
u
r
a
n
c
e
CURRENT
PROCESS
CONTROL
PREVENTION
CURRENT PROCESS
CONTROL
DETECTION
Area/Person
Responsible &
completion
date
Action(s)
Taken &
effective date
S
e
v
e
r
i
t
y
O
c
c
u
r
a
n
c
e
D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
R
P
N
(
1
4
0
)

C
l
e
a
n
i
n
g

&

o
i
l
i
n
g
R
u
s
t

p
r
e
v
e
n
t
i
v
e

O
i
lProper oiling and cleaning
not done.
Material may be
rusty/ Damage
5
Work Man miss
the operation
3
Work
instruction to be
provided in
packaging Dept.
Regular inspection by
packaging supervisor.
DOCK audit
5 75
(
1
5
0
)

C
o
l
o
u
r

C
o
d
i
n
g
L
e
v
e
n
d
o
r

C
o
l
o
r
wrong Color Code Used
Material Mix Up/
Customer
Dissatisfaction
4
Uneducated or
Untrained
Worker
3
On Job
training given
to Worker
100% Inspection 5 60
Reject Pin Mixed With
OK Pcs.
Customer
Complaint
4
REJECT PIN
NOT
IDENTIFIED
3
IDENTIFICATI
ON MARK ON
REJECT PINS
Regular inspection by
packaging supervisor.
DOCK audit
5 60
Quantity not as per the
customer requirement.
Customer
dissatisfaction
5
Defective /
uncalibrated
weighening
machine.
3
Calibration of
weighening
machine.
*Regular inspection by
packaging supervisor.
* DOCK audit
5 75
In correct labelling
Wrong material
may be supplied to
the customer.
5
Deferent type of
material kept on
line without
proper
identification
3
Training of
packaging
workman
Regular inspection by
packaging supervisor.
DOCK audit
5 75
Mix up the material
Wrong material
may be supplied to
the customer.
5
Deferent type of
material kept on
line without
proper
identification
3
5 S
implementation
on packaging
line.
Regular inspection by
packaging supervisor.
DOCK audit
5 75
As per Pkg. Standard
Customer
dissatisfaction
4
Unadequate
Handling
3

Display of
packaging
specification.
Regular inspection by
packaging supervisor.
DOCK audit
6 72
Criteria Symbol Rev.#
Critical 1
Major
Minor
Process Has Been Reveiwed 12.08.2013
R
P
N
Action Root Cause Rev. By. Date
06/30.06.2012
Part or
Function
(
1
6
0

&

1
7
0
)

P
a
c
k
a
g
i
n
g

&

D
i
s
p
a
t
c
h


-
Process
Requirem
ents
Description
Core Team :- 05/15/13 FMEA Rev.Date :- 12.08.2013
Drawing No.: G-02-860 Page : 1 of 1
Parveen goyal
Recommended
Action(s)
Potential Failure Mode
Potential Effect(s)
of the Failure
S
e
v
e
r
i
t
y
Current Process Action Results
D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
Potential
Cause(s) of the
Failure
POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS
(PROCESS FMEA) PFMEA : AMT/FMEA/2300
Item :- Pin Blank
Opeartion :- Packaging & Dispatch Prep. By : Parveen Goyal
Mr. Ramesh Triphati FMEA Rev. No. : 01