Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
L
ondon will become the first city to
officially host the modern Olympic
Games three times, having previously
done so in 1908 and in 1948. But its not all
joy Contractors have been hustling to
complete the estimated $760 million
construction project that was delayed in
the excavation stages of new 200 hectare
Olympic Park by unexploded German
WW2 bombs buried in the mud. And this
low-lying site has plenty of mud!
Some 7,000 people have been working
on the site for four years. At the height of
construction, up to 24 trains per week were
delivering aggregate products and cement
for over 400,000 cubic metres of concrete
batched on site for the London Olympic
Park, each train carrying 1,200 tonnes.
The construction is squeezed on time. As
recently as last month (May) there were still
11 temporary sites to construct - and the
site teams have to create five venues that
will have 143 sessions and 900,000 tickets
that don't start there until the middle of
June 2012. Thirty-four venues are under
construction or renovation and the cost
blowout to the British public is reported to
have reached AU$16.87 billion, way above
the original estimate.
Every permanent venue must have an
established after use no white elephants
was the mandate. But along the way they
seem to have lost their nerve, perhaps due
to the parlous state of the British economy,
and gone for the cheapest result.
The redevelopment of the area to build
the Olympic Park required compulsory
purchase orders of dozens of properties
as businesses fought eviction adding to the
delays - 206 companies had to relocate.
The result is mostly an uninspiring
collection of dreary prefabs with a London
Olympic stadium that has little visual
appeal (it was stripped of its fancities due to
budgetary constraints). Critics have
questioned both its aesthetic value and
suitability as a national icon - especially
when compared to the Beijing National
Stadium or Sydneys Olympic stadium for
that matter. The few permanent venues are
in place but the temporary ones are just
being built, which means the Olympic Park
still looks more like a building site than a
completed facility. No doubt it will come
good by the time the games commence,
and if not, it will likely be obscured by a
media blitz focussing on celebrities.
While the tight financial picture and
temporary nature of the games has
generated criticism, they have also been
welcomed as having prompted a
redevelopment of many of the areas of
London in which events are to be held the
site was a decrepit 200 hectare industrial
area in the east of London. Nearby,
Australias Westfield has constructed
Europes biggest shopping centre.
London 2012
Olympic Games
SQUEEZED
Australian Concrete Construction - June / July 2012 21
ON TIME
Some 7,000 people have been
working on the site for four years.
PROJECT FOCUS
The Olympic Stadium will have a capacity of 80,000 during the
Games: 25,000 permanent seats in its permanent lower tier, and a
temporary lightweight steel and concrete upper tier holding a
further 55,000 spectators that can be removed after the Games.
The organisers are hoping to sell this component after the games.
The concrete contains 40 percent less embodied carbon than
conventional concrete and was delivered to the onsite batching
plant by rail to limit the need for road transport.
Facilities for athletes within the Stadium include changing rooms,
medical support facilities and an 80 metre warm-up track. Spectator
services, refreshments and merchandise outlets are located outside
the venue on a podium that surrounds the Stadium, rather than being
located within the Stadium itself. To save money, the organisers are
believed to be using shipping containers as toilets this is something
you wont know about unless you have the experience of being there!
The stadium's track and field arena has been excavated out of the
soft clay found on the site, around which permanent seating for 25,000
as a sunken elliptical bowl, using concrete rakers. The natural slope of
the land is incorporated into the design, with warm-up and changing
areas being dug into a semi-basement position at the lower end.
The foundation of the base level uses concrete 5,000 piles up to
20 metres deep. From there, there is a mixture of driven cast in situ
piles, continuous flight auger piles, and vibro concrete columns. The
second tier, which allows for the addition 55,000 seats, is 315 metres
long, 256 metres wide; and 60 metres high. The stadium is built
using only 25 percent of the steel, 10,700-tonnes, in the structure
compared to that of the Olympic Stadium in Beijing. The designers
are proud of the minimal use of steel, which makes it 75 percent
lighter than Beijings, the stadium also reuses large pipes from a
previous gas pipe project, recycled granite, and all building
products were transported using trains and barges. While being no
doubt structurally efficient, the stadium simply fails to excite.
22 Australian Concrete Construction - June / July 2012
The games aim at sustainability
with low-carbon-dioxide concrete
PROJECT FOCUS
In the euphoria of the games the public will be treated to a
handball arena coated in recycled copper, to a foldaway basketball
stadium - and an artful sewage pumping station with its walls
lovingly adorned with designs of a Victorian sewage system which
runs nearby. Now, thats going to impress!
Best not to mention the massive sewage farm near the Olympics
site, or that recycling of sewage delivers drinking water to
Londoners, such that it is said that the water you drink has been
through seven other people!
The Basketball Arena, by architects Wilkinson Eyre, is one of two
venues that can be taken apart into kit form and transported. This one,
which seats 12,000, consists of a tent-like membrane stretched over
Australian Concrete Construction - June / July 2012 23
a random arrangement of curved forms. Rio gets the next games in
2016 so the Brits are hoping that they can be persuaded to buy it.
The other reusable building, Magma Architecture's Shooting
Range, consists of three separate structures located in the grounds
of the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich. Their walls are covered
in octopus-like fabric 'suckers' that act as ventilation shafts and, at
ground level, doorways.
The Central Park Bridge, spanning the river Lea between the
Olympic Stadium and the Aquatics Centre, is really three bridges in
a Z-shape. During the Games this will be the main pedestrian route,
so the gaps between the bridges have been filled in with a temporary
rubber surface that looks like a paint factory explosion.
The Handball Arena nicknamed the Copper Box looks like the
generic sports centre it will become post-Games, but the unassuming
design holds several surprises: a rainwater harvesting system,
retractable seating and 88 'light pipes' in the roof which reduce
lighting bills by 40 percent.
Another of the Olympic Park's set pieces,
the Aquatics Centre, is one of the few
permanent buildings intended for use by
the local community and elite swimmers
afterwards. The Centre is an indoor facility
with two 50 metre swimming pools and a
25 metre diving pool. It was designed by
Pritzker Prize winning female
architect Zaha Hadid in 2004
before London even won the bid.
The centre is located opposite the
Olympic Stadium on the opposite
bank of the Waterworks River. With
its distinctive architecture and
curved roof, it is the first venue
visitors see upon entering the
Olympic Park. The curvaceous
building is 45 metres high, 160 metres long;
and 80 metres wide. In direct contrast to all
the temporary lightweight structures, at least
the Aquatic Centre satisfies the concrete lover,
with prominent shapely concrete elements.
Unfortunately, it was reported that the centre
would cost about three times as much as was
originally estimated, totalling about 242m.
The six-board dive tower is made from 462 tonnes of concrete.
The steel roof weighs 3,200 tonnes. The three pools hold around 10
million litres of water. During the Games the venue will have a
capacity of 17,500. The two temporary 'wings' will be removed
post-games reducing the capacity to a regular 2,500, with an
additional 1,000 seats available for major events.
PROJECT FOCUS
24 Australian Concrete Construction - June / July 2012
Over one million tonnes of aggregate fill materials were
delivered to the Olympic Park, in addition to the aggregates
required for over 400,000 cubic metres of concrete production.
Carbon measurement and reduction is something that has
been very important on this project, and there has been a
strong commitment to reduce the embodied carbon in the
concrete destined for the Olympic Park.
The ability to deliver products to the site by rail had a
significant impact on the embodied carbon of the aggregate
materials. For example, the embodied CO
2
of the aggregate
from Cornwall was reduced by 73 percent by using rail
transportation compared to the equivalent road journey.
This rail transportation of raw materials and sustainable mix
design has reduced carbon emissions by a significant amount,
representing a 42 percent reduction against the UK industry
average for ready-mixed concrete.
The Olympics Development Authority specified at the
outset that 25 percent by weight of all materials used on the
Olympic Park venues and infrastructure should be recycled or
secondary products. The supply of concrete supported the
ODA and the Olympic Park contractors in a number of ways to
achieve this challenging objective.
The concrete supplier identified and selected a range of
secondary and recycled aggregate fill and single sized
materials for inclusion in the supply frameworks. These
materials complemented the primary products, and included:
Secondary aggregates arising from the production of
China Clay
Recycled rail ballast
Recycled construction and demolition waste
Glass sand manufactured from recycled bottles
The secondary and recycled materials were all delivered
to the Olympic Park by rail and offered as an alternative to
primary aggregate materials.
The Concrete
Should Win a Medal
B
rutalism is an architectural style that
was spawned in the modernist
architectural movement and which
flourished from the 1950s to the 1970s.
Buildings where the raw concrete is exposed
have the rare ability to remind people of
graffiti covered tunnels or industrial buildings
regardless of how well they are designed or
carefully constructed. They dont fit into the
streets and city centres where they appear
but their strength and power speak of a
time when people had a belief in architecture
as a force for civic good. These structures
were solid spaces to create a solid and
strong world emerging from the austerity
of the Second World War.
The original inspiration for the brutalist
style came from the designs of Swiss
architect Le Corbusier as well as those of his
followers, like Australias Harry Seidler.
The name originates from the French term
bton brut, or ' raw concrete' , although
concrete was not the only material these
buildings were constructed from, but it was
grey concrete that always dominated. It is
the label retrospectively given to a style of
architecture that flourished in the 1960s
and 1970s. It is perhaps most characterised
by heavy expanses of exposed concrete,
virtually no decoration and generally exposed
service pipes and brightly painted ducting.
At its worst it conjures up rows of soulless
grey Soviet apartment blocks or bleak
British housing estates that we see in
English cop dramas. No wonder it attracted
the name brutalism. It found its home in
Australia at many of our universities, with
blocky shapes that contrived to oppress the
spirits of generations of students.
Australia has taken the demolition hammer
to many of these unloved buildings. Sydneys
Macquarie University is a powerful expression
of the brutalist style, contrasting dramatically
with surrounding native greenery. The
University of Melbourne has several too,
these being the Engineering Building, the
Education Resource Centre Library and the
McCoy Building. But, Sydneys UTS tower on
Broadway tops the list of Australias ugliest
buildings for sure.
Brutalist buildings generally demonstrate
an aggressive largeness of scale with a
dominating, unfriendly, character. The style
aimed to be honest with structural materials,
with concrete walls, columns, beams, and
services such as lift and stair shafts expressed
as design features. This can be seen today in
Canberras High Court and the National
Gallery Precinct, particularly in the internal
support columns and the patterns of the
supporting beams as well as in the external
architectural elements. You will even see
concrete ceilings as a major feature in these
buildings.
Conflicts have raged over brutalist
buildings such as the landmark Cameron
Offices in Canberra. Built in 1975, these
offices are recognised as being so
significant that they were placed on the
Register of the National Estate. Yet
amazingly the Commonwealth overrode its
own heritage laws and demolished more
than two-thirds of the complex in 2003. And
26 Australian Concrete Construction - June 2012
BRUTALISM
SPECI AL REPORT
Concretes Ugly Duckling
26 Australian Concrete Construction - June / July 2012
Brutalist buildings generally demonstrate
an aggressive largeness of scale with a
dominating, unfriendly, character.
Boston City Hall
Building: UTS Lindfield
in Sydney there was much discussion about
the monolithic Sydney Masonic Centre and
the Sydney Entertainment Centre, both
now significantly altered to completely
cover up their raw concrete structures.
Architect Harry Seidler must be turning
over in his grave, because his prized
exercise in brutalism at North Sydney
Council offices has been painted over to
relieve the grey concrete appearance.
But he still has his Blues Point Tower (a
concrete monster that blights Sydney
Harbour unloved by many Sydneysiders).
One concrete building that encapsulates
all that is wrong with brutalism in a city
environment is the grimy grey Sydney Police
Centre in Surry Hills. Its heavy concrete
appearance is justifiable to some extent as
the building was designed to be bomb and
bazooka proof - if only New Yorks World
Trade Centre had similar concrete robust-
ness! Concrete can be cleaned to look
attractive as has the Sydney Opera House,
so there is no reason why the Sydney Police
Centre should continue to look so grimy.
It's not just that brutalist buildings often
don't interact with the surroundings and
appear hostile to human scale - it's also the
over-use of exposed concrete as a facade
material. Some of these buildings looked
OK when first completed, but invariably end
up looking post-apocalyptic when they are
stained with dark streaks. When brutalist
buildings have been well situated and well
looked after, they have been a success.
When set in rural surroundings the sheer
contrast of concrete against greenery can
be striking. Those lesser architects who
copied Le Corbusier houses in their verdant
surroundings forgot the need to do
likewise. Le Corbusier forgot it himself and
turned out a succession of overbearing
concrete buildings later in his career.
Australias best efforts in ugliness pale
beside the worst examples of brutalism
elsewhere.
If you were to heed what the inhabitants
of Boston in the US say, then you would no
doubt hear them wanting to tear down
their brutalist City Hall, which weighs
90,000 tonnes. In Americas oldest metropolis,
where traditional brownstones set the tone
and civic outlook is closely linked to
America's colonial past, the City Hall is one
major monstrosity. In 1976, the American
Institute of Architecture voted Boston City
Hall among the six most important buildings
in the United States. Today it picks up no
awards. Today, the opposition to this building
is a popular sport: Many find it hard to
imagine anything as ugly. Boston City Hall
opened in 1969. It has since climbed to the
top of the list of World's Top 10 Ugliest
Buildings and Monuments.' Unfortunately,
concrete also figures in the remaining nine
on the ugly list.
The new city hall, based on a master plan
by architect I.M. Pei, was to be the flagship
of an idealistic Government Centre.
Although it is now hard to imagine, the
Boston City Hall was a signal for a new
beginning, as a vital hub for education and
innovation.
SPECI AL REPORT
Australian Concrete Construction - June / July 2012 27
Could it be gaining
some love at last?
Could exposed concrete
be returning to favour?
Sydney Police Centre
Robin Hood Gardens London
Today we have wonderful plastic coated plywood formwork and
excellent formwork systems that ensure great appearances. Low
range water reducers and self-compacting concretes have helped
enormously. Dont even think about off-form unless you have the
budget to do it well (Parliament House Canberra
shows how). You need 40 Mpa off-white
concrete for a creamy mix dont do it with less
for large areas. Just remember that there is no
colour control in ordinary blended cements,
each pour can look different.
So off-form concrete is due for a revival but only
under new thinking and techniques, dont try to
replicate what was done 40 years ago! Why it didnt
work before was due to the variable absorbency of
rough-sawn timber formwork and poor curing control. Architects
complained that the concrete came out runny at the start of the pour
and finished as a stiff porridge. It was common for agitator drivers
to add lots of water to the concrete. Concrete has the property of
the wetter mix areas to look darker when cured,
most unfortunate! Absorbent areas of timber
formwork showed up as a patchy lighter colour.
If you want a rough sawn today use a quality
boarded-patterned form liner from companies
like Rekli - dont go with timber boards over
large areas. Consider this in factory precast
panels for a quality result. But over small areas -
remember keep it to small areas - old-fashioned
timber boarded can look great.
Does their unpopularity mean we destroy all the brutalism style
buildings, much the same as we tore down so many of our beautiful
Victorian and Georgian buildings that were seen as harbouring
disease and classed as slums at one time. Now, we see that as
vandalism, and a great mistake, to rip the Victorian heart out of our
cities. Will the next generation vilify us because we seem to favour
the demolition of brutalist buildings?
''If you look at fashion, it comes back with a trend after everybody
has forgotten about it. Seventies is trendy now - all the 70s colours
are back now. Could the same happen with brutalism?
There are an increasing number of people who now are seeing
some brutalist buildings in a new light. As our cities build more and
more faceless glass shoe-boxes, there are those who are starting to
appreciate the honesty of the few remaining brutalist buildings.
Many have had heritage orders placed on
them, like the unfortunately named Harold
Holt Swimming Pool in Melbourne.
With a global economy that has managed to
homogenise everything from architectural,
fashion and graphic design, historians in the
future will have a difficult task in determining
what was happening in Shanghai or Sydney,
simply because the same buildings are built,
the same clothes are worn, the same music is listened to, and the
same movies are seen.
Brutalism was one of the last architectural styles that pre-dated
globalism. It was a time when society thought the future of science-
fiction was upon us. Le Corbusier and the new modernist movement
sought to eradicate the past, and its irrelevant cosy urban lifestyle.
28 Australian Concrete Construction - June 2012 28 Australian Concrete Construction - June / July 2012
SPECI AL REPORT
People are only now seeing
Brutalist buildings in a new light
New Brutalist-revival
buildings are about to
be built in our cities
How were those brutalist boarded concrete finishes done?
UTS Tower Sydney
University library in California -
at least its earthquake resistant!
Vitra fire station by Zaha Hadid
The National Gallery in Canberra is a good example of a
brutalist concrete building coming good with age. Canberra
spiders love the rough bush-hammered concrete walls, perfect
for their webs. The silky sheen of spiders webs adds a softening
to the rawness of the concrete walls. The Sydney Opera House
is displaying a lovely patina as the skin oils from thousands of
visitors touching the concrete have added a polish where
they have touched. Unfortunately for curtain-wall and painted
panels, the opposite is true unlike concrete, lightweight
construction can look pretty dire after just a few short years!
Today, the worlds most famous female architect Zaha Hadid
is an unabashed brutalist - single-mindedly, she has placed
raw concrete on a pedestal of public approval. In 2004 Hadid
became the first female recipient of the Pritzker Architecture
Prize, architecture's equivalent of the Nobel Prize.
Her Phaeno Science Centre in Wolfsburg, Germany, is a
floating concrete megalith that stands on stilts. It embodies
the same materials and design philosophies that signified
brutalism. Her MAXXI - National Museum of the 21st Century
Arts in Rome similarly revels in its exposure of raw concrete.
Showing that concrete has arrived again is the RIBA Stirling
Prize for architecture awarded to this building as the best
building built in Europe for that year.
Brutalism can look good just wait!
30 Australian Concrete Construction - June / July 2012
PRODUCT FOCUS
Rawlinsons has been producing building price
books since 1983 and is the leading source of
construction cost information in Australia.
The company first published the Rawlinsons
Australian Construction Handbook after conducting
a survey that revealed that such a manual was
much needed within the construction
industry and it was subsequently
received with great enthusiasm. Users
can be confident that each and every
price in both books has been
reviewed, researched and updated as
necessary, in each new edition.
Rawlinsons publications have an
extensive circulation and are highly
respected by all involved in construc-
tion, from all three levels of government; bankers;
developers; builders; risk assessors; architects;
engineers; quantity surveyors; building owners;
hospitals and health sectors; insurers; etc. and our
publications have areas of interest covering the
requirements of these and many other disciplines.
This year, in keeping with the companys
philosophy of constantly developing its publications,
Rawlinsons has enhanced and increased the data
on green and sustainable construction issues
including green design; energy management and
auditing and; environmental management. Other
sections covered in this book include:
building price indices;
building costs per
square metre;
elemental costs;
comparative costs;
detailed prices;
refurbishing and
recycling;
labour and plant
constants;
building planning, administration and
management and;
international costs for selected countries.
The Handbook is a 950-page, hard-covered book
and is targeted at commercial projects.
Rawlinsons Construction Cost Guide was
formulated particularly for the small commercial
and domestic market, and has been specifically
developed to meet the need for costing informa-
tion for the smaller project. Now, in 2012, in its
twentieth edition, this publication covers building
price indices; building costs per square metre;
elemental costs; comparative costs; detailed
prices; renovations; labour constants
and; property insurance.
The Cost Guide is a 275-page book
that is not designed to compete
with the Handbook, but rather to
complement it.
Rawlinsons has not increased its
prices for the 2012 editions, with the
cost of Rawlinsons Australian
Construction Handbook remaining at
$375.00 per book, whilst Rawlinsons Construction
Cost Guide is $248.00. These figures include GST,
quarterly updates for April, July and October 2012
and, courier delivery to your street address.
For further information please Email:
info@rawlhouse.com or to place an order, please
visit the website: www.rawlinsons.com
Rawlinsons Construction Cost Books 2012
Australian Concrete Construction - June / July 2012 31
High quality REO
Bending & Shearing
Machines. Large range
of machines in stock at
great prices
SHEARING | BENDING | FABRICATION BEND | SHEARING TION ABRICA AT FFA | DING
great
f machine
Machines.
Bending &
High qu
t prices
es in stock a
Large rang
& Shearing
ality REO
8 | h F 0 8 0 | h 6 P 8 0 A S T T | L T 0 P
www.reid.com.au
For Pre Cast or Tilt-Up
Product & Engineering Support
1300 780 250
a C e r P r o F
i g n E & t c u d o r P
p U - t l i T r o t s
t r o p p u S g n i r e e n i