Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Review Report
This Report form is to be completed jointly between the staff member and the reviewer. The
Report is confidential and access shall be limited to the staff member,
Reviewer/Supervisor/Head of School/ and their supervisors.
Position Level
7 October 2004
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REPORT
SECTION 1: REVIEW OF PREVIOUS 12 MONTHS
This section provides the opportunity, in discussion with your reviewer, to:
Summarise your achievements over the previous 12 months, in the context of personal and
institutional expectations. Refer to the objectives/targets set in your previous review (if
possible)
Identify any difficulties encountered in the previous 12 months, or other factors that may have
affected work undertaken
Consider how well you have met the University’s expectations of all staff.
1.1 ACHIEVEMENTS
7 October 2004
1.3 EXPECTATIONS OF ALL UWA STAFF
Descriptors are at Appendix 2 of the Professional Development Review Guidelines
Personal Effectiveness
Working Collaboratively
As part of Section 1, the staff member’s duties and responsibilities have been reviewed and:
Their duties and responsibilities have remained consistent with their current position description
OR
A revised position description will be drafted and submitted to Human Resources for
certification OR
~End of Section 1 ~
7 October 2004
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REPORT
SECTION 2 : GOALS FOR THE NEXT 12 MONTHS
The purpose of this section is to help you develop agreed goals for the next 12 months.
When setting goals, it may be useful to consider the following areas (these are suggestions
only).
In addition to work related goals, you may wish to consider personal goals.
2.1 GOALS
~ End of Section 2 ~
7 October 2004
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REPORT
SECTION 3: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
~ End of Section 3 ~
7 October 2004
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REPORT
SECTION 4: RECOMMENDATION
(NON SUPERVISOR REVIEWERS ONLY)
Reviewers complete this section only when they are not the direct
supervisor/line manager of the staff member being reviewed. The purpose of
this section is to make a recommendation to the Head of School/direct
supervisor regarding the reviewee’s performance. It should be agreed, as far
as possible, between the reviewer and reviewee. Reviewers who are direct
supervisors proceed to Section 5.
Staff member exceeded expectations (as defined in the previous PDR or other
relevant documentation).
Staff member has met expectations (as defined in the previous PDR or other
relevant documentation).
The staff member’s performance did not meet expectations.
Where the reviewee’s performance did not meet expectations a meeting with
the Head/direct supervisor is required to establish performance expectations
and prior to completion of Section 5.
Describe any matters arising that need to be discussed with the Head of School /Supervisor. This
should include any institutional barriers to staff performance.
The staff member has developed appropriate goals for next 12 months
Head/Supervisor should review goals identified for next 12 months with staff
member
SIGNATORIES:
I agree with the above appraisal outcome I disagree with the above appraisal outcome *
(Add any comments in the box below)
Reviewee Signature Reviewee Signature
Date Date
Date Date
7 October 2004
* PLEASE NOTE : Where the reviewee disagrees with the appraisal they have
the right to attach a written comment to this effect (see box below). In
circumstances where the staff member exercises this right, their signature
above certifies only that the PDR has been conducted. The outcomes of the
review will proceed for discussion to the next level of supervision for
clarification of expectations for future performance.
~ End of Section 4 ~
7 October 2004
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REPORT
SECTION 5: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW RECORD
Name of Reviewee
Name of Reviewer
Date of Review
PLEASE NOTE: Where the review process has been delegated the Head of
School/Supervisor should liaise with the reviewer and reviewee if clarification is
required.
Summary comment:
Comment:
7 October 2004
TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
A Training and Development Plan has been agreed (see Section 3)
Listing items below indicates that the required time and resources will be made available.
Date Date
Date Date
* PLEASE NOTE : Where the reviewee disagrees with the appraisal they have the right to
attach a written comment to this effect (see box below). In circumstances where the staff
member exercises this right, their signature above certifies only that the PDR has been
conducted.
~ End of Section 5 ~
7 October 2004