Introduction: Dining in the Trees The leopard is an excellent example of an organism adapted to its environment It survives because of adaptations to its environment Examples are coat camouflage and hunting and climbing ability Adaptations are the result of evolution Evolution is the process of change that transforms life Biology is the scientific study of life
In lifes hierarchy of organization, new properties emerge at each level Lifes levels of organization define the scope of biology Life emerges through organization of various levels With addition of each new level, novel properties emerge called emergent properties Properties of the whole depend on interactions of parts The whole is greater than the sum of the parts The upper tier is a global perspective of life Biosphere: all the environments on Earth that support life Ecosystem: all the organisms living in a particular area Community: the array of organisms living in a particular ecosystem Population: all the individuals of a species within a specific area The middle tier is characterized by the organism, an individual living thing, composed of Organ systems: have specific functions; are composed of organs Organs: provide specific functions for the organism Tissues: made of groups of similar cells Life emerges at the level of the cell, the lower tier, which is composed of Molecules: clusters of atoms Organelles: membrane-bound structures with specific functions Cells: living entities distinguished from their environment by a membrane
The unity of life: All forms of life have common features All living things share common properties Order: the complex organization of living things Regulation: an ability to maintain an internal environment consistent with life (homeostasis; breathing, etc.) Growth and development: consistent growth and development controlled by DNA Energy processing: acquiring energy and transforming it to a form useful for the organism Response to the environment: an ability to respond to environmental stimuli Reproduction: the ability to perpetuate the species Evolutionary adaptation: acquisition of traits that best suit the organism to its environment
Three domains (groups) of life Bacteria: prokaryotic, and the most are unicellular and microscopic Archaea: like bacteria in many ways, are prokaryotic and most are unicellular and microscopic Eukarya: are eukaryotic and contain a membrane bound nucleus and other organelles Determined by rRNA sequences
What is Science? Science is the process of using observations and experiments to draw evidence-based conclusions Science is not just a body of established facts; its a way of knowing Process used to generate body of facts Science Is a way of knowing Seeks natural causes for natural phenomena (logical explanations) Scientists use two main approaches to learn about nature and understand natural causes for natural phenomena: 1. Discovery Science: uses verifiable observations and measurements to describe science Scientists describe some aspect of the world and use inductive reasoning to draw general conclusions Chimps Wage War: Chimps in Uganda observed for 10+ years, found that chimps patrol and defend their territory 2. Hypothesis based science: uses the data from discovery science to explain science This requires proposing and testing of hypotheses Hypothesis: untested theory, educated guess, explanation (why or how) Must be testable, falsifiable With hypothesis-based science, we pose and test hypotheses Make some observations Frame a question/pose a testable hypothesis Make a prediction based on your hypothesis Devise ways to test the accuracy of your prediction (gather info/run experiments) Access the results the Data. Do Data affirm or disprove hypothesis? Report your results There is a difference between a theory and a hypothesis A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a set of observations. Must be testable and falsifiable. A theory is supported by a large and usually growing body of evidence A theory is a well-established explanation that is widely accepted as true by many scientists working independently of each other.
With hypothesis-based science, we pose and test hypotheses We solve everyday problems by using hypotheses An example would be the reasoning we use to answer the question/observation, Why doesnt the flashlight work? Using deductive reasoning we realize that the problem is either the (1) bulb or (2) batteries. The hypothesis must be testable The hypothesis must be falsifiable Another hypothesis: Mimicry helps protect nonpoisonous king snakes from predators where poisonous coral snakes also live because predators avoid the coloration pattern on both snakes. The hypothesis predicts that predators learn to avoid the warning coloration of coral snakes Experimentation supports the prediction of the mimicry hypothesis nonpoisonous snakes that mimic coloration of coral snakes are attacked less frequently The experiment has a control group using brown artificial snakes for comparison (baseline amount that animals hunt snakes) The experimental group is artificial snakes with the red, black, and yellow ring pattern of king snakes
How do scientists draw conclusions? Scientists draw conclusions from the best evidence they have at any one time. Conclusions may be modified in the future as other scientists ask different questions or use improved technology to uncover better data To properly evaluate a scientific claim, we need to look closely at how the science was done.
Science is a process: Asking questions Anecdotal evidence is an informal observation that has not been systematically tested (can not be published as a conclusion) Anecdotal evidence can lead to the formulation of questions.
Science is a process: Studying previous research Peer review is a process in which independent scientific experts read scientific studies before their publication to ensure that the authors appropriately designed and interpreted their study. Reading relevant peer-reviewed literature helps to give a sense of what information currently exists on the subject of interest.
Science is a process: Forming scientific hypotheses The information in peer-reviewed literature can be used to formulate a scientific hypothesis a testable and falsifiable explanation for a scientific observation or question. Not all explanations are scientific hypotheses. Statements of opinion, and hypotheses that use supernatural or mystical explanations that cannot be tested or refuted, fall outside the realm of scientific explanation. Hypotheses can never be proved true once and for all. If a hypothesis is shown to be false, it can be rejected and removed from the list of possible answers to the original question. If the data support the hypothesis, it will be accepted until further testing and data show otherwise. It is impossible to test whether a hypothesis is true in every possible situation.
Science is a process: Experimentation Scientific hypotheses can be tested using experimentation. An experiment is a carefully designed test, the results of which will either support or rule out a hypothesis. Controlled experiments use experimental groups and control groups to test a hypothesis. The experimental group is the group in an experiment that experiences the experimental intervention or manipulation (caffeinated coffee) The control group is the group in an experiment that experiences no experimental intervention or manipulation (decaf coffee)
The independent variable is the variable, or factor, being deliberately changed in the experimental group (caffeine). The control group receives a placebo a fake treatment given to control groups to mimic the experience of the experimental groups (decaf coffee). The placebo effect is the effect observed when members of a control group display a measurable response to a placebo because they think they are receiving a real treatment. In order to rule this out, the participants in the experiment do not know whether they are receiving a placebo or the experimental treatment. The dependent variable is the measured result of an experiment (memory). It is analyzed in both the experimental and control groups. In a controlled experiment, the control group and experimental group differ only in the independent variable, so the results of the experiment provide evidence-based conclusions.
Science is a process: Drawing conclusions Confidence in scientific findings is increased by repetition of an experiment by other scientists. The sample size of the experiment can strengthen our confidence in the results of the study (40 people is not very much). The sample size is the number of experimental subjects or the number of times an experiment is repeated. In human studies, the sample size is the number of subjects. The larger the sample size, the more likely the results will have statistical significance. Statistical significance is a measure of confidence that the results obtained are real, rather than due to random chance. The more experiments that support a hypothesis, the more confident we can be that it is true. A hypothesis that continues to hold up after many years of rigorous testing may eventually be considered a scientific theory. Scientific theories are different than everyday theories. In science, a theory is a hypothesis that has never been disproved, even after many years of rigorous testing.
Science is a process: Publication Results of an experiment are published in peer-reviewed journals. The studies in these scientific journals are reviewed by experts before publication to ensure accuracy.
Finding Patterns Scientists can make observations or comparisons of phenomena in nature to answer questions that could not be tested through controlled laboratory experiments for ethical/practical reasons. Epidemiology is the study of patterns of disease in populations, including risk factors (epidemiological studies observe people already smoking, etc.). Pro: No limit to people you can observe, less costly than normal study Con: takes many years Randomized clinical trials, or controlled medical experiments in which subjects are randomly chosen to receive either an investigational treatment or a placebo, are used to measure the effects of a variable under controlled conditions. Scientific studies of drugs can be complicated due to side effects. Correlation is a consistent relationship between variables. Data may show correlation between two variables, but it does not prove that one variable causes the other.
Evaluating scientific information It is important to be cautious when making decisions based on a single epidemiological study. Complexity of a disease makes it unlikely that every variable can be controlled for. Small sample sizes can influence accuracy of results. The specific population of the study may not be representative of the general population. Scientists rely on peer-reviewed scientific reports to learn about new advances, but the public often relies on brief media reports that are not always completely accurate in their portrayal of the conclusions of scientific studies.