0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
46 vues1 page
Research paper within Neuro-Combatives™ detailing analysis of both martial arts students and, for lack of a better term, untrained fighters, where it is of the observation that some of the methods of fighting employed by these two examples are successful within the following variables; predictability of punching, probability of impact upon a desired target (if any) and psychological aspects. Discussion of the Persona Unity Theory is presented.
Titre original
Statistical vs Tactical Fighters & the Persona Unity Theory_020914
Research paper within Neuro-Combatives™ detailing analysis of both martial arts students and, for lack of a better term, untrained fighters, where it is of the observation that some of the methods of fighting employed by these two examples are successful within the following variables; predictability of punching, probability of impact upon a desired target (if any) and psychological aspects. Discussion of the Persona Unity Theory is presented.
Research paper within Neuro-Combatives™ detailing analysis of both martial arts students and, for lack of a better term, untrained fighters, where it is of the observation that some of the methods of fighting employed by these two examples are successful within the following variables; predictability of punching, probability of impact upon a desired target (if any) and psychological aspects. Discussion of the Persona Unity Theory is presented.
Ivan Siladji, Neuro-Combatives Original Version 07.06.05, Reviewed 02.09.14 Statistical vs. Tactical Fighters and the Persona Unity Theory 1 Ivan Siladji, Founder; Neuro-Combatives
1 http://www.selfdefenceintl.com, Email: selfdefenceinternational@gmail.com, @selfdefenceintl, @neurocombatives, Sydney, NSW Australia
Abstract
After some analysis of both martial arts students and, for lack of a better term, untrained fighters, it is of the observation that some of the methods of fighting employed by these two examples are successful within the following variables; predictability of punching, probability of impact upon a desired target (if any) and psychological aspects.
Introduction
It appears prevalent that some fighters, wether trained or not resort to executing attacks based soley on probability such that the fight is statistical rather than tactical. It can be seen in such situations that a skilled fighter, one that initiates and executes techniques does so with strategy. The skilled fighter is clearly differentiable to his counterpart, the statistical fighter. The statistical fighter executes attacks with no clear strategy whereby the probability of landing a successful strike, wether on a desirable target or not increases with the frequency of punches, all this while unaware that vital channels of entry maybe open for the tactical fighter to penetrate.
So, in deducing such events, as a general statement, that is, acknowledging the uniqueness of different martial artists, I propose that there are at least two types of fighters.
1. The Statistical Fighter
Such opponents contribute little to no thought in the fighting methods, that is, attacking is ignorant, thinking only of the outcome but smothered by rage or anger rather than the tactical process required to achieve it. The attacks are probable, that is, they carry with them no tactical purpose but rather a probability of striking a useful target area. Generally, the greater the frequency of these attacks, the greater the probability of a somewhat successful outcome, however fewer attacks of this form may also be executed with the same probable outcome. Such opponents can thus be dangerous as their ignorance can carry them through the tactical fighters attacks blindly. Generally, either due to lack of training, ignorance, arrogance or any combination of these, statistical fighters are restricted in their fighting mentality and thus methods.
2. The Tactical Fighter
Fighters of this personality are generally aware, aware of themselves and their actions. Their attacks are planed and are encoded with success. Executions generally maintain defence and they are highly offensive in execution. Such fighters are unrestricted in the sense that employment of functional techniques does not go unseen. If it works, it is used. A technique that is cowardly to one, namely, the statistical fighter, is a potential success to the tactical fighter. A tactical fighter initiates technique(s) and or concepts with purpose, the line of attack is quickest and/or safest and hence techniques are not probable; they are tactical. Such fighters, when highly trained generally prevail over their counter part, the statistical fighter. They are highly pre- emptive and attack on the offense when a threat is inevitable. These fighters generally train in reality-based systems or consciously recognise limitations in traditional methods and their training methods may be more unorthodox.
Conclusion
In summation it wouldnt be unique to suggest there should exists a unity of the two, however, an imbalanced unity, an awareness of the other while adopting one. In Neuro-Combatives we refer to this coexistence of awareness as the Persona Unity Theory. That is, adoption of a tactical fighters unrestrictive fighting [method] with an understanding of the statistical fighters mentality allowing awareness of the combat situation and its outcomes. The superior fighter is thus one who is tactical in his fighting method yet aware of the mentality of a statistical fighter, that way one will be aware of how the statistical fighter will play the game and tactic and subconscious application of concept can be used to win it.