299

REFERENCES
1. Alberti L.B., The Ten Books of Architecture, Dover Publications,
New York, Book IV, Chapter VIII, p. 173, 1986.
2. Alexander C., Ishikawa S. and Silverstein M., A Pattern Language,
Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 590-591, 1977.
3. Anderson P.R., Montesin H.J. and Adena M.A., Road Fatality Rates
in Australia 1984-85, Federal Office of Road Safety, Report CR 70,
p. 20, 1989.
4. Antoniou J., Planning for Pedestrians, Traffic Quarterly, Eno Foundation,
Connecticut, 1971, reprinted in Urban Transportation: Perspectives
and Prospects, Eno Foundation, Connecticut, pp. 231-240, 1982.
5. Appleyard D., Livable Streets, University of California, Berkeley,
p. 50, 1981.
6. Ball K., Bauman A., Leslie E. and Owen N., Perceived environmental
aesthetics and convenience and company are associated with walking
for exercise among Australian adults, Preventive Medicine, Vol. 33,
pp. 434440, 2001.
7. Barnett J., An Introduction to Urban Design, Harper and Row,
New York, p. 168, 1982.
8. Bentley I., Alcock A., Murrain P., McGlynn S. and Smith G.,
Responsive Environments: A Manual for Designers, The
Architectural Press, London, pp. 10-105, 1985.
9. Booth M.L., Owen N., Bauman A., Clavisi O. and Leslie E., Social-
cognitive and perceived environmental influences associated with
physical activity in older Australians, Preventive Medicine, Vol. 31,
pp. 15-22, 2000.
10. Brambilla R. and Longo G., Handbook for Pedestrian Action,
Columbia University Centre for Advanced Research in Urban
and Environmental Affairs, Columbia, 1977, extract reprinted in
Time-Saver Standards for Urban Design, McGraw Hill, New York,
pp. 6.6-1 6.6-10, 2003.
300
11. Brownson R.C., Baker E.A., Houseman R.A., Brennan L.K. and Bacak
S.J., Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the
United States, American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 91,
No. 12, pp. 1995-2003, 2001.
12. Buchanan C., Traffic in Towns, The Specially Shortened Edition of
the Buchanan Report, Penguin, Harmondsworth, pp. 56-57, 1963.
13. Burden D., Walkable Communities, Florida Dept. of Transportation,
Florida, pp. 1-13, 1995.
14. Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), Footfalls Obstacle
course to Livable cities, Delhi, p. 49, 2009.
15. Chiara J.D. and Crosbie M., Time Saver Standards for Building
Types, McGraw Hill Professional Publishing, New York, p. 205,
2001.
16. Cooper Marcus C., Francis C. and Russell R., People Places: Design
Guidelines for Urban Open Space, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New
York, pp. 13-84, 1998.
17. Corbusier L., The Radiant City, Faber and Faber, London, p. 121,
1967.
18. Corti B., Donovan R.J. and Holman C.D.J., Factors influencing the
use of physical activity facilities: results from qualitative research,
American Journal of Health Promotion, Vol. 7, pp. 16-21, 1997.
19. County Council of Essex, A Design Guide for Residential Areas,
Essex County Council, Chelmsford, pp. 65-71, 1973.
20. Craig C.L., Brownson R.C., Cragg S.E. and Dunn A.L., Exploring the
effect of the environment on physical activity: A study examining
walking to work, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 23,
No. 2 (supplement), pp. 36-43, 2002.
21. Cutler L.S. and Cutler S.S., Recycling cities for people (The urban
design process), CBI Publishing Company, Inc., Boston,
Massachusetts, p. 154, 1982.
22. Daff M. and Cramphorn B., Pedestrian Audit: A Process to Raise the
Consciousness of Designers, Proceedings from the 1994 Australian
Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety and Travel Workshop, Melbourne,
pp. 223-230, 1995.
301
23. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR),
Road Accidents Great Britain 1996: The Casualty Report, The
Stationery Office, London, 1997, cited in Research, Development,
and Implementation of Pedestrian Safety Facilities in the United
Kingdom, Federal Highway Administration, Virginia, p. 2, 1999.
24. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR),
Guidance on the Use of Tactile Paving (Notified Draft, September
1997), The Stationery Office, London, 1997a, cited in Research,
Development, and Implementation of Pedestrian Safety Facilities in the
United Kingdom, Federal Highway Administration, Virginia, p. 29,
1999.
25. Department of Transport (DOT), Local Transport Note 1/95 The
Assessment of Pedestrian Crossings, HMSO, London, 1995, cited in
Research, Development, and Implementation of Pedestrian Safety
Facilities in the United Kingdom, Federal Highway Administration,
Virginia, p. 19, 1999.
26. Department of Transportation, State of Florida, Manual of Uniform
Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance for
Streets and Highways (Florida Greenbook), Florida, U.S.A., pp. 8-1
8.7, 2002.
27. Doxiadis C., Ekistics: An Introduction to the Science of Human
Settlements, Hutchison, London, p. 5, 1968.
28. Ekman L., Bulletin 76. Fotgngares risker p markerat
vergngsstlle jmfrt med andra korsningspunkter, (Pedestrian Risk
at Zebra Crossings Compared to Other Crossing Points), Department
of Traffic Planning and Engineering, Lund Institute of Technology,
Sweden, 1988, cited in Pedestrian Safety in Sweden, Federal
Highway Administration, Virginia, pp. 4-11, 1999.
29. Federal Highway Administration, Pedestrian Safety in Australia,
U.S.Department of Transportation, Virginia, pp. 19-20, 1999.
30. Federal Highway Administration, Research, Development and
Implementation of Pedestrian Safety Facilities in the United
Kingdom, U.S. Department of Transportation, Virginia, pp. 27-28,
1999a.
31. Federal Highway Administration, Pedestrian Safety in Sweden,
U.S.Department of Transportation, Virginia, pp. 16-19, 1999b.
302
32. Federal Highway Administration, Pedestrian Facilities Users Guide
Providing Safety and Mobility, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Virginia, U.S.A., pp. 42-108, 2002.
33. Frank L.D. and Engelke P.O., The built environment and human
activity patterns: Exploring the impacts of urban form on public
health, Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 202-218,
2001.
34. Fruin J.J., Pedestrian: planning and design, Metropolitan Association
of Urban Designers and Environmental Planners, Inc., New York,
1971, extract reprinted in Time-Saver Standards for Urban Design,
McGraw Hill, New York, pp. 6.5-1 6.5-16, 2003.
35. Gehl J., Life Between Buildings, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New
York, p. 177, 1987.
36. Gibberd F., Town Design, Architectural Press, London, p. 230, 1955.
37. Giles-Corti B. and Donovan R.J., The relative influence of individual,
social and physical environmental determinants of physical activity,
Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 54, pp. 1793-1812, 2002.
38. Government of Andhra Pradesh, City Development Plan-2015,
Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, pp. 56-61, 2005.
39. Government of Delhi, Delhi Master Plan 2021, Delhi Development
Authority, pp. 65-73, 2007.
40. Government of India, UDPFI Guidelines, Institute of Town Planners
India and Ministry of Urban Development, New Delhi, 1996, cited in
Footfalls, Centre for Science and Environment, Delhi, p. 49, 2009.
41. Government of India, National Urban Transport Policy, Ministry of
Urban Development, New Delhi, pp. 1-20, 2006.
42. Government of India, Working Group on Urban Transport for the
Eleventh Five Year Plan (2007-2012), Ministry of Urban
Development, New Delhi, p. 22, 2006a.
43. Government of India, Service Level Benchmarks for Urban Transport
at a glance, Ministry of Urban Development, New Delhi, pp. 23-24,
2009.
303
44. Government of Karnataka, Bangalore Master Plan 2015 Volume 1
Vision Document, Bangalore Development Authority, pp. 36-42,
2007.
45. Government of Tamilnadu, Second Master Plan for Chennai
Metropolitan Area 2026, Chennai Metropolitan Development
Authority, Volume One, Chapter Four Traffic and Transportation,
pp. 26-40, 2008.
46. Government of West Bengal, City Development Plan-2025, Kolkata
Metropolitan Development Authority, pp. II-23 II-28, 2006.
47. Greenwald M. and Boarnet M.G., The Built Environment as a
Determination of Walking Behavior: Analyzing Non-Work Pedestrian
Travel in Portland, Oregon, Transportation Research Record: Journal
of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1780, TRB, National
Research Council, pp. 33-42, 2002.
48. Hall E.T., The Hidden Dimension, Anchor Books (Doubleday), New
York, pp. 41-63, 1966.
49. Handy S.L., Boarnet M., Ewing R. and Killingsworth R.E., How the
built environment affects physical activity: views from urban
planning, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 23, No. 2
(supplement), pp. 64-73, 2002.
50. Hediger H., Wild Animals in Captivity, Butterworth, London, 1950,
cited by Hall E.T. in The Hidden Dimension, Anchor Books
(Doubleday), New York, pp. 8-10, 1966.
51. Hegemann W. and Peets E., The American Vitruvius, An Architects
Handbook of Civic Art, Benjamin Blom, New York, p. 154, 1922.
52. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_populous_cities_in_India,
retrieved on 14.05.2009.
53. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_populous_metropolitan_are
as_in_India, retrieved on 14.05.2009a.
54. http://web.archive.org/web/20040616075334/www.censusindia.net/res
ults/town.php?stad=A&state5=999, retrieved on 14.05.2009.
55. http://www.citypopulation.de/world/Agglomerations.html, retrieved on
14.05.2009.
304
56. Hunt J.G. and Lyons G.D., Enhanced Operating Strategies to Improve
Pedestrian Amenity and Safety at Midblock-Signalled Pedestrian
Crossings, PTRC Vol. P 419, pp. 183-196, 1997.
57. Hydn C., Odelid K. and Vrhelyi A., Effekten av generell
hastighetsdmpning i ttort. Resultat av ett storskaligt frsk i Vxj.
(The Effects of a General Speed Reduction in Urban Areas, Result of a
Large-scale Experiment), Department of Traffic Planning and
Engineering, Lund Institute of Technology, Sweden, 1992, cited in
Pedestrian Safety in Sweden, Federal Highway Administration,
Virginia, pp. 12-13, 1999.
58. Hydn C., Odelid K. and Vrhelyi A., Effekter av generell
hastighetsdmpning i ttort, Huvudrapport. (The Effects of a General
Speed Reduction in Urban Areas, Main report), Department of Traffic
Planning and Engineering, Lund Institute of Technology, Sweden,
1995, cited in Pedestrian Safety in Sweden, Federal Highway
Administration, Virginia, pp. 12-13, 1999.
59. Indian Roads Congress (IRC), Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities
IRC: 103 -1998, New Delhi, pp. 3-17, 1998.
60. Institute of Highways and Transportation (IHT), Guidelines for
providing for journeys on foot, London, pp. 9-148, 2000.
61. Institute of Road Transport (IRT), Pedestrian Safety in Madras City,
Chennai, 1990, cited by Anantharajan T. in Perception of Road Users
on Pedestrian Safety in Chennai, Proceedings of the National
Conference Neglected and Vulnerable Road User - The Pedestrian,
Institute of Road Traffic Education, New Delhi, pp. 89-90, 2001.
62. Jacobs A., Great Streets, MIT Press, Boston, pp. 293-308, 1993.
63. Jacobs J., The Death and Life of Great American Cities, Random
House, New York, pp. 35-81, 1961.
64. Jaskiewicz F., Pedestrian Level of Service based on Trip Quality,
TRB Circular E-C019: Urban Street Symposium, Dallas, pp. G-1/1
G-1/14, 2000.
65. Jones S.M., and Farmer S.A., Pedestrian Ramps in Central Milton
Keynes: A Case Study, Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol. 34(3),
pp. 122-128, 1993.
305
66. Jordan P., Road Safety Audit What It Can Do to Improve Safety
for Pedestrians, Proceedings from the 1994 Australian Pedestrian and
Bicyclist Safety and Travel Workshop, Melbourne, pp. 213-222, 1995.
67. Khisty C.J., Evaluation of pedestrian facilities: beyond the level-of-
service concept, Transportation Research Record 1438, pp. 45-50,
1994.
68. Klinenberg E., Heat wave: A Social autopsy of disaster in Chicago,
The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p. 91, 2002.
69. Krier R., Urban Space, Academy Editions, London, 1979, extract
reprinted in Time-Saver Standards for Urban Design, McGraw Hill,
New York, pp. 3.9-1 3.9-10, 2003.
70. Kroll J., Moving About in a Technological World: A Hermeneutic-
Phenomenological Inquiry of Urban Streets and Freeways as Public
Architecture, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Architecture,
University of California, Berkeley, 2001, cited by Kroll J. in
Assessing the Environmental Quality of Walking: Steps Toward a
Person-Centered Level of Service, Proceedings of the Fourth Asian-
Pacific Transportation Development Conference held at Oakland,
California, pp. 8-10, 2003.
71. Kunstler J.H., The Geography of Nowhere, Touchstone (Simon and
Schuster), New York, pp. 39-57, 1994.
72. Lynch K., The Image of the City, MIT Press, Cambridge,
Massachusetts, p. 4, 1960.
73. Maertens H., The Optical Scale in the Plastic Arts, Wasmuth, Berlin,
1884, cited by Moughtin C. in Urban Design: Street and Square,
Butterworth, London, p. 38, 1992.
74. Moughtin C., Urban Design: Street and Square, Butterworth,
London, pp. 11-147, 1992.
75. Nagaraj B.N., A Study on the need for Pedestrianization of the central
area of Calicut City, Proceedings of the National Conference
Neglected and Vulnerable Road User - The Pedestrian, New Delhi,
pp. 36-41, 2001.
76. Neufert E., Neufert Architects Data, Blackwell Science Limited,
London, p. 17, 2000.
306
77. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Traffic
Safety Facts, Washington, 1996, cited in Pedestrian Safety in
Australia, Federal Highway Administration, Virginia, p. 3, 1999.
78. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Safe
routes to school: Overview, Washington, pp. 1-17, 2003.
79. Norberg-Schulz C., Existence, Space and Architecture, Studio Vista,
London, p. 18, 1971.
80. Palladio A., The Four Books of Architecture, Dover Edition, New
York, Third Book, Chapter II, p. 59, 1965.
81. Parida P., Najamuddin and Parida M., Development of Qualitative
Evaluation Methodology for Sidewalks in Delhi, ITPI Journal,
Vol. 4(3), pp. 27-33, 2007.
82. Pikora T., Giles-Corti B., Bull F., Jamrozik K. and Donovan R.,
Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental
determinants of walking and cycling, Social Science and Medicine,
Vol. 56, pp. 1693-1703, 2003.
83. Portland Office of Transportation, Portland Pedestrian Design Guide,
Portland, Oregon, U.S.A., pp. 1 D-18, 1998.
84. Pushkarev B. and Zupan J.M., Urban Space for Pedestrians, MIT
Press, Massachusetts, pp. 1-209, 1969.
85. Ramachandran K., Lesser Citizens fall victims to rash motorists,
http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/2000/11/13/stories/0413401x.htm,
retrieved 22.07.2004, 2000.
86. Richards B., Future Transport in Cities, Spon Press, London, pp. 29-
33, 2001.
87. Ritter P., Planning for man and motor, Pergamon Press, London, pp.
10-330, 1964.
88. Ross C.E. and Mirowski J., Neighborhood disadvantage, disorder, and
health, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Vol. 42, No. 3,
pp. 258-276, 2001.
89. Sanyal S., Alternative Urban Futures Report, World Wildlife Fund
India (WWF India), New Delhi, pp. 82-84, 2009.
307
90. Sarkar S., Determination of Service Levels for pedestrians, with
European examples, Transportation Research Record 1405, pp. 35-42,
1993.
91. Sarkar S., Qualitative evaluation of comfort needs in urban walkways
in major activity centres, Paper presented at TRB Annual Meeting,
Washington, pp. 3-32, 2003.
92. Scriven R.W., Raised Median Strips A Highly Effective Road
Safety Measure, Proceedings of the 13th Australian Road Research
Board Conference, Adelaide, Vol. 13(9), pp. 46-53, 1986.
93. Shafer C.S., Lee B., Turner S. and Hughart M., Evaluation of bicycle
and pedestrian facilities: user satisfaction and perceptions on three
shared uses trails in Texas, Texas A&M University, pp. 1-58, 1999.
94. Sitte C., Der Stdtebau, Birkhauser, Basel, 1889, extract reprinted in
Time-Saver Standards for Urban Design, McGraw Hill, New York,
pp. 2.1-1 2.1-12, 2003.
95. Sommer R., Personal space (The behavioural basis of design),
Prentice Hall, Inc., New Jersey, pp. 3-11, 1969.
96. Standards Australia, AS 1742.10, Manual of Uniform Traffic Control
Devices, Part 10: Pedestrian Control and Protection, Sydney, pp. 6-
33, 1990.
97. Standards Australia, AS 1428, Design for Access and Mobility,
Sydney, pp. 17-25, 1993.
98. Subramanian K.P. and Kanagaraj M., Pedestrian Safety in India, A
Far Cry Case Study of Chennai City, Proceedings of the National
Conference Neglected and Vulnerable Road User - The Pedestrian,
Institute of Road Traffic Education, New Delhi, pp. 26-35, 2001.
99. Surface Transportation Policy Project (STPP) and California Walks,
Pedestrian Safety in California: Five Years of Progress and Pitfalls,
California, pp. 8-9, 2002.
100. Taylor M.A.P. and Rutherford L.M., Speed Profiles at Slow Points on
Residential Streets, Proceedings of the 13th Australian Road Research
Board Conference, Adelaide, Vol. 13(9), pp. 65-77, 1986.
101. Tibbalds F., Making People-Friendly Towns, Spon Press, London,
pp. 1-108, 2001.
308
102. Tiwari G., Urban Transport in Indian Cities, http://www.urban-
age.net/10_cities/07_mumbai/_essays/india_Tiwari.html, retrieved
24.12.2009, 2007.
103. Transportation Research Board (TRB), Highway Capacity Manual,
National Research Council, Washington, Chapter Eleven, pp. 11-1
11-7, 2000.
104. Uhlig K., Pedestrian areas From Malls to Complete Networks,
Architectural Book Publishing Company, New York, pp. 6-38, 1979.
105. Untermann R.K., Accommodating Pedestrians, Van Nostrand
Reinhold, New York, p. 25, 1984.
106. Vastu Shilpa Foundation, Aranya, Ahmedabad, India, pp. 29-30,
1990.
107. WSAtkins International, Preliminary Report of Findings,
Comprehensive Transportation Study, MMRDA, p. 287, 1994.
108. Webster D.C. and Mackie A.M., Review of Traffic Calming Schemes
in 20 mph Zones, TRL Report 215, Transport Research Laboratory,
Crowthorne, U.K., 1996, cited in Research, Development, and
Implementation of Pedestrian Safety Facilities in the United
Kingdom, Federal Highway Administration, Virginia, p. 32, 1999.
109. Wekerle G. and Whitman C., Safe Cities Guidelines for Planning,
Design and Management, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 11-
30, 1995.
110. Wilbur Smith Associates, Study on Traffic and Transportation
Policies and Strategies in Urban Areas in India, MOUD, pp. 21-45,
2008.
111. Whyte W.H., The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces, Conservation
Foundation, Washington D.C., 1980, extract reprinted in Time-Saver
Standards for Urban Design, McGraw Hill, New York, pp. 2.12-1
2.12-8, 2003.