0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
12 vues2 pages
"EVIL BEING IN CIVILIZATION" is considered the most influential work in the context of sociology and anthropology. It's an investigation into the roots of human unhappiness, on the conflict between instincts and culture. The author demonstrates that civilization and sexuality coexist always confrontational mode.
"EVIL BEING IN CIVILIZATION" is considered the most influential work in the context of sociology and anthropology. It's an investigation into the roots of human unhappiness, on the conflict between instincts and culture. The author demonstrates that civilization and sexuality coexist always confrontational mode.
"EVIL BEING IN CIVILIZATION" is considered the most influential work in the context of sociology and anthropology. It's an investigation into the roots of human unhappiness, on the conflict between instincts and culture. The author demonstrates that civilization and sexuality coexist always confrontational mode.
Let us pause to think: Why the War? Because the Major Epidemics? Was part of an exchange of ideas with Einstein Freud, made at the request of the League of Nations, predecessor of the UN. Impressed with the horrors of the First World War, the two reflected on the nature of war and how to avoid it or reduce its scope. The same reasoning is also valid for the Major Epidemics, as currently, our coexistence with Ebola. Hence, Freud writes "EVIL BEING IN CIVILIZATION" which is considered the most influential work in the context of sociology and anthropology. Was written on the eve of the collapse of the exchanges in New York (1929) scholarship and published in Vienna the next year. So, 85 years ago. But, totally applicable to ours days... It's an investigation into the roots of human unhappiness, on the conflict between instincts and culture. Discusses the fact that culture - a term that the author equates to civilization - produce a malaise in humans. There is a dichotomy between instinctual impulses and civilization, therefore, for the sake of civilization, the individual is overwhelmed in his drives and lives in malaise. And the way he, human, takes on modern civilization. Also constitute, in the words of historian Peter Gay: "A Psychoanalytic Theory of Politics." New introductory lectures can be read as a standalone work, for summarizing the key findings of psychoanalysis and expose their developments after 1917. The most influential of these is "The Dissection of the Psychical Personality". Therefore, the malaise in civilization is a penetrating investigation into the origins of unhappiness on the conflict between individual and society and their different configurations in civilized life. In the translation of Paulo Csar de Souza, which preserves the conceptual accuracy and dimension of all literary prose of the creator of psychoanalysis: The book provides a real dip in Freudian Theory of Culture, according to which civilization and sexuality coexist always confrontational mode? From the biological foundations of libido and aggression, Freud demonstrates that the repression and sublimation of sexual instincts as well as his conduit for the world of work are the main causes of mental illnesses of our time. Conclusion we reached: The human being suffers from Oedipal Disease... What is disease? Disease is a set of specific signs and symptoms that affect a living being, changing your normal health. The word is of Latin origin, where "dolentia" means "pain, suffering." In general, the disease is characterized as the absence of health; on reaching a state that an individual causes disorders of mental and physical functions. Can be caused by exogenous factors (external, environment) or endogenous (internal, the body itself). According to Freud, the Oedipus complex is when the child reaches the phallic sexual period during childhood and then gives account of the difference of sexes, tending to lay down his libidinal attention to people of the opposite sex in the family environment. Freud was based on the tragedy of Sophocles (496-406 BC), Oedipus the King, to formulate the concept of the Oedipus complex, the veiled preference of the child by the mother, accompanied by a clear dislike of the father. In the play (and in Greek mythology) Oedipus killed his father Laius and married his own mother, Jocasta. After discovering that his mother was Jocasta, Oedipus pierces his own eyes and Jocasta commits suicide. Sophocles used this myth to prompt a debate on the issue of guilt and accountability standards, ethics and taboos established in their society (behavior that, within the customs of a community, it is considered harmful and harmful to normal, being seen by this as dangerous and prohibited its members). In his essay Dostoevsky and parricide cite Freud besides Oedipus the King, two other works that portray the complex: Hamlet and The Brothers Karamazov. The Oedipus complex is a reference to the threat of castration caused by the destruction of the phallic genital organization of the child, rooted in psychodynamic libidinal, whose background libidinal experiences that begin in the womb removed. Important to note that the libido is a sexual energy, but not only is the sexual practice, but also in investments that individuals make to obtain pleasure. The Oedipus complex is a key concept for psychoanalysis, as understood by this universal and therefore characteristic of all human beings. The Oedipus complex is characterized by mixed feelings of love and hostility. Metaphorically, this concept is seen as love to hate his father and mother (not the father to be exclusive, can be any other person that distracts the attention she has for her son), but this idea remains, just because the world child comes down to these parental figures or representatives of them. Once the human being cannot be conceived without a father or a mother (although never come to know of these parts or both), the relationship that exists in this triad is, according to psychoanalysis, the essence of human conflict. The Oedipus complex is very important because it characterizes the differentiation of the subject in relation to parents. The child begins to realize that parents belong to a cultural reality that can not only dedicate themselves to it because they have other commitments. The father is the inclusion of children in the culture is the cultural order. The child also begins to realize that belongs to the mother and father so directs hostile feelings towards this. The differentiation of the subject is permeated by the identification of the child with a parent. In positive identification, the boy identifies with the father and the girl with her mother. In negative identification, fear of losing one whom hostilizamos or not being loved makes identifying happen with the figure of the opposite sex and this can cause homosexual behavior. Therefore: With the resolution of the Oedipus complex, the reign of the impulses and instincts rises to a more rational and coherent plan. By VISION PSYCHOSOMATIC, we cannot forget the Infantile Neurosis; Children's Diabetes; etc.; as a legacy of an unresolved Oedipus... In the game contains a child is much more than your present and past, there is a sense of future that is contained by the parents and the analyst. In the treatment is aspirated to establish, among other things, health and anticipatory expected IDs. I think in the game, identificatory ghosts carriers neurotic disorder that dwell in Patient I, can announce their arrival on the scene in adolescence to generate, like the father, Neurosis; Diabetes one; etc.. Pubescent. Psychoanalytic thinking of a possible intervention for family members with chronic organic or neurotic patients opens a door for prevention for those sick individuals inhabited by ghosts, and that health systems only expect that presents what they call genetic destiny. Therefore: CULTURE IS THE BEST REMEDY FOR DISEASE EDPCA! Confronting, Conflict Through our Drives Internal and External Interference of Civilization, which gives us the condition of health and survival. Thus avoiding major epidemics, the wars, all it's mass extermination... So how to respond to dying people infected with Ebola people call? How reassure citizens who are in the risk zone of Ebola? We cannot forget that Action by World Health Organ are being taken, new drugs being developed and tested; measures and hygiene criteria and anti- contamination being used; clarification of Symptoms of Ebola and any symptoms that look for medical or humanitarian help. But we cannot forget that the world is in RISK! Be Ebola; other Major Epidemics, by which we have passed as HIV, etc .; by wars, civilian aircraft are killed by missiles, like the toy a "virtual little game" between Great Powers, all the POWER. By VISION PSYCHOANALYTIC, we can do it through: RECEPTION; EMPATHY; LINKS SOUND; HOLDING (Support of Omnipotence Mother Baby); Reverie (breaking this Omnipotence, to be able to fantasize); Construction of Identity of the Subject; Social graces of the Individual (its Humanization); of his Introduction to Culture. All this experience is organized in Dyadic and Triadic or oedipal. Celia Gevartoski CPN 502004. SP Clinic psychoanalyst and training analyst Cognitive / Behavioral Director of the Center for Training of ABPC Course Coordinator Training in Psychoanalysis https://www.facebook.com/minhahistoriacomapsicanalise?ref=bookmarks
Totem and Taboo: The Horror of Incest, Taboo and Emotional Ambivalence, Animism, Magic and the Omnipotence of Thoughts & The Return of Totemism in Childhood
TOTEM & TABOO: Resemblances between the Mental Lives of Savages and Neurotics: The Horror of Incest, Taboo and Emotional Ambivalence, Animism, Magic and the Omnipotence of Thoughts & The Return of Totemism in Childhood