Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Course Summary
Vineeth Abraham
College of Optical Sciences
University of Arizona
09 December 2009
OPTI 517 Lens Design: Course Summary
Contents
Chapter Page
1 - What is Imaging 3
3 - Overview of Aberrations
6
4 - Reading Aberrations
10
5 - Chromatic Aberrations
16
7 - Image Quality
22
8 - Classical Lenses 26
9 - Tolerancing 29
References 31
Chapter 1
What is Imaging?
Maxwellian Definition:
These are simplified for 1-D and 2-D cases (projection of a point
to a point and a line to a line)
a1;X a1 X a2Y
X '= X '= Y'=
a0 X + b0 a0 X + b0Y + c0 a0 X + b0Y + c0
; ; ;
;
Chapter 2
This allows us to write the equations of a refracted paraxial ray in the form:
f’ = n'∅ and f = - n∅
Also, Transverse magnification, m=nn' z'z
Invariants
In the above equations, the two rays are arbitrary. But when these rays are
the Marginal and Chief rays, the invariant is called the Legrange Invariant. It
is denoted as,
Ж = nuy – nuy
A stop in the system that limits the amount of light passing through the
system is called the aperture stop. The image of this aperture stop in object
space is called the Entrance pupil and the image in image space is called the
Exit pupil. The aperture stop introduces order into the system by controlling
stray light and unwanted fields.
Also, in any system, the exit pupil is an important point of
consideration since it is the ideal point to define wavefront deformation and
diffraction effects are minimized at this point.
Cardinal Points
Chapter 3
Overview of Aberrations
Aberrations are interesting phenomenon which can help in design of
optical systems. Aberrations can be looked into using ray and wave
approach. The wave approach helps to understand superposition of errors
more easily.
Aberrations are caused due to the deformation of the ideal wavefronts.
Ideally wavefronts are spherical and homocentric. Hence, wavefront
deformation is measured as the distance between the reference wavefront
and the aberrated wavefront along the actual ray path at the exit pupil.
The various aberration functions are also called Seidel sums since they were
defined by Seidel. They are:
Spherical
Aberration
Coma ------------------
Astigmatism ---------
Distortion ------------
Aspheric Surfaces
Stop shifting
Stop shifting refers to changing the position of the stop from the element to
another point along the optical axis, but at the same time, changing the size
of the stop to maintain the f-number of the system.
Changing the stop position affects the off-axis aberrations. The variation of
aberrations with stop shifting is given by,
Structural coefficients
This is when the Seidel aberration coefficients are written in terms of y, the
marginal ray height at the principal plane, ∅, the power and ℵ, the Legrange
invariant. σ are the structural coefficients.
Bending of a lens
Bending is the process by which the power of the lens is maintained but the
shape factor, X as defined above, is varied. This is useful since the
aberrations depend on the shape factor. For example, spherical aberration is
a quadratic function of the shape factor and coma is a linear function.
Bending of a lens
Chapter 4
Reading Aberrations
Since the lens design programs display the performance of the system using
OPD curves, it is very important that the user should know what the
aberrations are from the OPD curves. The good thing about wave fans is that
knowing the aberrations in terms of the waves helps to identify the
diffraction limits very easily. The shape and nature of the various fourth-
order aberrations are as given below:
W020 Defocus
Defocus is a second order aberration and is caused due to the rays coming
to focus at different points along the optical axis from different points in the
aperture. Thus it is a variation of focal length with aperture. It does not have
any field dependence.
W020 ∝ ρ2
W111 Tilt
This term represents the tilt in the image plane and has a linear dependence
on Field and Aperture.
W111 ∝ H ρ cosθ
W131 Coma
From the seidel sum expression, we can deduce the ways to eliminate coma.
Correction of Coma
➢ Stop location – Placing the stop at the natural stop position eliminates
coma. It uses the fact that y=0 at the stop position. At the natural stop
position, y=0 for both on-axis and off-axis beams.
➢ A or A can be made zero by having the surface concentric to wavefront.
Under both of these conditions, coma will be zero.
➢ Coma will be eliminated also if ∆un= 0, which means the surface is
aplanatic.
These four cases are shown in figure below, where, B = A
Abbe Sine Condition – Abbe proposed that the condition for zero coma is
that the paraxial magnification be equal to the real ray marginal
magnification since coma can be considered as variation of magnification
with pupil position. This can be formed into an expression as shown below.
uu' = sinUsinU' where u and u’ are the paraxial ray angles and U and
U’ are the real ray angles
W222 Astigmatism
Correction of Astigmatism
As seen from the seidel sum expression for Astigmatism, there is three ways
to eliminate astigmatism.
➢ Y = 0 by making the image plane at the surface
➢ Make A zero by making the surface concentric with the incoming
wavefront.
➢ Make the surface aplanatic which will satisfy ∆un= 0
The figure below explains these three cases.
W311 Distortion
Correction of Distortion
Chapter 5
Chromatic Aberrations
Chromatic aberration in general refers to the change in lens aberrations as a
function of wavelength. In general we can define two first order aberrations
that change with wavelength; the focus, W020 and magnification W111. The
former is called axial chromatic aberration and the latter, lateral chromatic
aberration. Since refractive index is the most important factor when talking
about chromatic aberration, we will now look at the properties of various
glasses.
Properties of Glasses
Refractivity: nd – 1
Mean Dispersion: nF – nC
Partial Dispersion: nd – n C
Abbe number ν =
Glasses are also divided into many categories based on these properties.
• Crown Glass – has a ν > 50
• Flint Glass – has a ν < 50
• Normal glass – it is made up of soda-lime, silica and lead.
The glass catalog describes the two important properties of glass, the nd/ν
plot. Shown below is typical glass catalog from the manufacturer [1]
Also, it is impossible to find out the refractive index of a glass for all
wavelengths. So interpolation formulas like Hartman, Conrady, Kettler-
Drude, Sellmeier, Herzberger and Schott’s own formula are used which
calculates ‘n’ from known data points.
We can now define the actual variation of first order coefficients with change
in wavelength.
Also, on stop shifting, the change in axial and lateral chromatic aberrations
will be,
• δλ W020 = 12 y2f ν
• δλ W020 = y*yf ν
Achromatization
Achromatic Wedge:
For a wedge, the desired condition would be deviation without any
dispersion. Two wedges are used normally, one being crown glass and the
other a flint glass. Deviation
Dispersion
Secondary dispersion
Hence,
and,
The image is formed in between the lenses and the marginal ray height
changes from positive at the first lens to negative at the second lens. Thus
by designing the values of y, f, and ν, appropriately, we can cancel lateral
chromatic aberration.
The Maksutov meniscus – This design makes use of the fact that a
meniscus lens can be thought of as a plano convex lens, a parallel plate and
a plano concave lens. Since the focal lengths are opposing, we can make the
axial chromatic aberrations cancel.
Here also the focal lengths are opposite while the marginal ray height will be
positive since it is the square. So the objective achieves axial chromatic
aberration correction. But the problem with this design is that the image is
virtual and in between the lenses. This is not very useful for a telescope
objective. Hence the design was modified to develop the Schupman medial
telescope.
The Schupman medial telescope works on the same principle as a
Schupman dialyte. But the difference is that, to deal with the diverging
beam from the negative element, the exit surface if the element is mirrored
to focus the light back. This negative lens-mirror combination is called a
Mangin mirror. The setup is shown below which corrects for axial chromatic
aberration.
But this design can be improved by adding a field lens at the intermediate
image plane. In such a configuration, y = 0 at the Objective and the Mangin
mirror and y = 0 at the field lens. As a result, the system gets corrected for
lateral chromatic aberration also.
Chapter 6
Fresnel lens
A Fresnel lens is different from a diffractive optical element. Some of the
differences are:
• Scale is larger – the size of the zones is in the order of mm
• Wavefronts are discontinuous – There appears to be breaks in the
wavefront after diffraction
• Due to the broken wavefronts, the pattern at the image plane will be a
random pattern instead of an airy disc
Fresnel Zone Plate: A Fresnel zone plate is used amplitude modulate the
incoming wave and focus it to a point. Rings which contribute with
destructive interference are made opaque. The radius of the rings in a
Fresnel zone plate for a focal length of f is given by: rn ≈ nλf
Amplitude and Phase: Amplitude modulated DOE will modulate the light by
placing opacities in the path of light. But this results in loss of light. A phase
modulated design is more efficient as it uses the phase modulation produced
by the glass of a particular thickness.
Blaze is defined as the geometry that is used in phase modulated elements.
It has a saw-tooth structure in most elements. It determines the amount of
energy that goes into each order.
Zone boundary determines the shape of the wavefront emerging
Chromatic properties
For a refractive lens,
∅refractive = n-1R
Modeling DOE
Two point construction model
This was done by having two point sources and letting the waves interfere.
The resulting pattern will emulate a DOE. This was done in the earlier lens
design programs where the user could specify the two points, the
wavelength and the order at which work is done.
Point A(x,y,z)
Phase Model
In this method, the deformation introduced by the DOE is modeled by a
polynomial of the form,
Sweatt’s Model
Sweatt’s model was first introduced to overcome the problem of modeling
DOE in lens design programs. He found that by increasing the refractive
College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona 27
OPTI 517 Lens Design: Course Summary
Aberrations in DOE
The aberrations introduced by DOE can be found by substituting the
Sweatt’s model in the structural coefficients. Thus by assuming refractive
index to be infinity in the equations for the structural coefficients of a thin
lens, we can obtain the expressions for diffractive aberrations.
Efficiency
The ideal curve of a DOE is nearly impossible to fabricate. Hence it is
constructed in multi-level microstructures. The efficiency of the DOE is
dependent on the number of levels used for fabrication of the curve. This
dependence is given by the formula,
η1N = [sinπN(πN)]2 where N is the number of levels and 1 is the
diffraction order
Chapter 7
Image Quality
Image quality is important since it decides the resolution and hence the
readable information content in an image.
Wavefront error
For error budgeting, it is always better to utilize RMS error rather than peak-
to-valley error.
Surface error
The size of a bump is defined in wave terms where, σ = Δt/λ , where Δt is the
physical size of the bump and λ is th wavelength of light. Hence the
wavefront error produced by a bump will be,
WFE = σ Δn where Δn is the difference in refractive index between the two
media and for a mirror, WFE = 2σ.
Rayleigh Criterion
Image quality is acceptable if wavefront error does not exceed λ/4 peak-to-
valley. This corresponds to 0.07 waves of RMS error (Φ) and a Strehl ratio of
0.8
Strehl ratio = e-(2πΦ)2
Spot Diagrams
The problem with ray aberration curves is that it does not give any
information about the skew rays. Hence we use spot diagrams. But the
problem with spot diagrams is that it does not give information about the
intensity, if more than one ray is falling at the same point.
Diffraction
The Point Spread Function is used when diffraction also comes into the
picture. PSF gives the image of a point object. Diffraction makes the PSF of a
point object into an airy disc. But the effect of aberrations is to spread the
energy from the central order to the outer rings. This is shown in the figure
below. Aberrations also change the shape of the PSF. But at 0.8 Strehl ratio,
the PSF due to the different aberrations are comparable.
(Figure from lecture by Richard Juergens)
11:12:33
Hence for an aberration free system with a round pupil, the MTF will be of
the form, DIFFRACTION LIMIT
WAVELENGTH WEIGHT
DIFFRACTION MTF 500.0 NM 1
λf
AXIS
2
MTF ( f ) = [ϕ − cosϕ1.0sinϕ ] where ϕ13-Oct-02
= cos−1 ( f / f co ) = cos−1 ( and 0.00000
)DEFOCUSING f is the spatial frequency in
π lpmm 2 NA
Thus, we get an MTF of the form given below.
0.9
0.8
0.7
M
O 0.6
D
U
L 0.5
A
T
I
O 0.4
N
0.3
Cutoff
0.2 frequency
0.1 fco = 1 / (λ f/#)
50 150 250 350 450 550 650 750 850 950
SPATIAL FREQUENCY (CYCLES/MM)
Chapter 8
Classical Lenses
Landscape lens
Chevalier lens
a 200mm focal length a lens of 60mm diameter was needed. But the lens
helped in the taking the design of the achromatic doublet one step further.
The problem of the portrait lens was that it was slow. At f/15, it was very
hard to take photographs of people due to the movement of the subject.
Hence, Petzval designed an f/3.3 lens system which was fast enough to take
portrait photographs. It consisted of two elements which were achromatised
individually with the stop in between. Splitting the lens helps to reduce
spherical aberration and the symmetry about the stop helps to control coma.
Distortion was in control since the lens had a relatively small field of view of
15º.
Periscopic lens
The periscopic lens helped to bring the idea of doubling the lens into lens
design. In this method, the rear lens is designed with a flattened tangential
field and then a symmetrical lens is placed in front with respect to the stop.
Using the same principle, Dallmeyer and Steinheil came up with a faster lens
than the landscape lens with a smaller field of view. The lens also had the
problem of field curvature and the tangential field was artificially flattened.
Schroeder Lens
In all the earlier lenses we have seen, there was the problem of astigmatism
being used to correct for field curvature. To get rid of both of these,
schroeder took the new achromat lens which were then doubled. The
speciality was that since the new achromat decreases the field curavature,
College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona 35
OPTI 517 Lens Design: Course Summary
Protar
The Protar lens was made by Paul Rudolf of Zeiss Optics and the lens used a
low power old achromat meniscus in front of the stop along with the new
achromat. This meniscus helps to reduce the spherical aberration caused by
the new achromat. As a result the lens has a well corrected field, and very
good spherical aberration and astigmatism control. Since the lens is
symmetrical, it cancels out distortion too to an extent.
Cooke Triplet
The design of the lens was done in steps by Alvan Clark and Paul Rudolph. It
started with the normal landscape lens which has negative coma and
spherical aberration. So a thick meniscus was added which had positive
coma and corrected spherical aberration. Clark doubled this lens to arrive at
a patented design. Rudolph carried the design further by adding a buried
surface which corrected for axial chromatic aberration without adding any
spherical aberration. So now the lens had a flat field due to the meniscus
shape, no astigmatism due to the symmetry of the stop position, correction
of spherical aberration due to the shape factor of the meniscus and odd
aberration cancelled due to symmetry. The lens was very fast and performed
well over an acceptable FOV and the spot size was nearing the diffraction
limit.
Chapter 9
Tolerancing
From what I learnt in the lens design class until now, designing of lenses is
an art. It is a skill acquired over a long period of time with practice since
there is a lot of parameters that needs to be controlled and there a lot of
interdependence. But an equally challenging task awaits a designer even
after he designs his lenses. That is the process of tolerancing. Tolenrancing
of lenses is needed since a lens cannot be perfectly manufactured. Errors
during manufacture in radius, index, thickness, spacing etc., lead to a
decrease in the merit function and image quality. Hence a designer should
always mention tolerances within the constraints of which an acceptable
image quality will be obtained. Simple tolerancing techniques include having
compensators in the system, which are parameters of the system that can
be varied to compensate to any error accumulating due to manufacturing
flaws. Some of the tolerancing limits as explained by R. Shannon in his book
is as given below.
Using Statistics
Also, each system parameter has its own probability distribution function
(PDF) for performance, and making use of the central limit theorem, we can
link these individual PDFs to the overall system PDF. Finally by integrating
the PDF we can estimate how many systems will meet a given performance.
Sensitivity analysis
In this method, we will be given the design value of system parameters like
radius, thicknesses etc., and each will have a tolerance range. So we change
each of the parameters within the tolerance values for the surfaces and
analyze the change in the system merit function. Thus we are finding the
sensitivity of the system for these changes and this is called the sensitivity
analysis.
Monte Carlo
References
➢ 517 Introduction to Lens Design – Class notes and Lectures – Jose
Sasian
➢ Image Quality Lecture – Richard Juergens
➢ OPTI 517 Class Summary by Matthew Lang
➢ http://images.pennnet.com/articles/lfw/thm/th_lfw30238-20.gif
Acknowledgements
This class summary was prepared based on the knowledge obtained in
lens design from the OPTI 517 course and I would like to thank the TA, Lirong
Wang at this time who was always willing to clear any doubt I had, however
trivial it was. This was especially important for me since I had taken the
course without taking the Aberrations course, OPTI 509 which was
considered to be a prerequisite.
I would also like to thank Prof. Jose Sasian for sharing his immense
knowledge in the interesting field of lens design. This course helped me to
gain an insight into the challenges and subtleties of this field which also one
of my favorite among the optics research areas.