Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
.
The texture chosen for the intersection m ust be
applied after finishing and before curing the concrete.
Either m echanical or hand-operated equipm ent can
adequately apply the texture, how ever, confined inter-
section w ork zones m ay lim it the practical use of
m echanical equipm ent.
Curing the Concrete
C uring is the treatm ent or protection given concrete
during the hardening period. C uring m easures are
necessary to m aintain a satisfactory m oisture and
tem perature condition in the concrete, because inter-
nal tem perature and m oisture directly influence both
early and ultim ate concrete properties.
(11,14)
Proper
curing m easures prevent rapid w ater loss from the
m ixture and allow m ore thorough cem ent hydration.
Therefore to m axim ize concrete quality it is necessary
to apply curing m easures as early as possible after
placing concrete.
(11,14)
C uring is also critical to provid-
ing a durable pavem ent surface that w ill retain surface
texture.
A variety of curing m ethods and m aterials are avail-
able for concrete pavem ent, including: w ater spray or
fog, w et burlap sheets, plastic sheets, insulating blan-
kets, and liquid-m em brane-form ing com pounds.
(f
cr
)
0.5
(Eq. 2)
w here:
fr = flexural strength (m odulus of rupture) in third-
point loading, M Pa (psi).
f
cr
= required average com pressive strength, M Pa
(psi).
C = A constant betw een 8 and 10 for norm al m ix-
tures [for high-strength concrete C ranges from
7.5 to 12 (11.7 recom m ended)].
Non-destructive Testing Som e agencies, con-
sultants and contractors use non-destructive strength
testing to evaluate concrete pavem ent at early ages.
M aturity and pulse velocity testing m ethods are com -
m on on fast-track concrete pavem ent projects.
(14,15)
M aturity testing provides strength evaluation through
m onitoring of internal concrete tem perature in the
field. The basis of m aturity is that each concrete m ix-
ture has a unique strength-tim e relationship.
Therefore, a m ixture w ill have the sam e strength at a
given m aturity no m atter w hat conditions (tim e or
tem perature) occur before m easurem ent.
(14,15)
To
im plem ent m aturity on a project, technicians m ust
develop a calibration curve in the laboratory. The cali-
bration curve is used to convert field concrete tem -
perature m easurem ents to strength values.
Pulse-velocity is another non-destructive test available
for determ ining concrete strength at early ages. It is a
true non-destructive test that m easures the tim e
required for an ultrasonic w ave to pass through con-
crete from one transducer to another. The velocity of
the w ave correlates to concrete strength or stiff-
ness.
(14,15)
Like m aturity testing, pulse-velocity testing
requires laboratory calibration to produce m eaningful
field inform ation. In the laboratory, technicians take
pulse-velocity m easurem ents through a representative
num ber of cast concrete specim ens, test the speci-
m ens for strength, and plot the results against the
pulse-velocity readings to create a calibration curve.
N on-destructive test m ethods m ay be better suited to
evaluate opening strength of concrete intersections
and other pavem ent because there is no delay
betw een sam pling and testing the concrete. W ith
standard cylinders or flexural beam s, specim ens m ust
be prepared, and som etim es transported to a testing
laboratory. R eferences 14 and 15 provide m ore infor-
m ation on non-destructive test m ethods.
Table 7. Strength necessary to open concrete pavement to public traffic (Based on References 14 and 15).
* Granular foundation assumes a Modulus of Subgrade Reaction, k=27 MPa/m (100 psi/in.). Stabilized
foundation assumes k=135 MPa/m (500 psi/in.).
** Assumes there will be 500 one-way equivalent single axle load (ESAL) repetitions between time of opening
and time concrete reaches design strength (28-day strength).
*** There was no compressive strength criteria in the original research (Reference 14). The values shown here
were developed using the correlation equation described in this section with C=9.0. It is strongly
recommended to develop a unique correlation between flexural and compressive strength for new mixtures.
Opening Strength**
Slab Thickness Foundation Flexural (3rd-Point) Compressive***
Support* MPa (psi) MPa (psi)
150 m m (6.0 in.) G ranular 3.7 (540) 24.8 (3600)
Stabilized 2.6 (370) 11.7 (1690)
200 m m (8.0 in.) G ranular 2.3 (330) 9.3 (1350)
Stabilized 2.1 (300) 7.6 (1100)
250 m m (10.0 in.) G ranular 2.1 (300) 7.6 (1100)
Stabilized 2.1 (300) 7.6 (1100)
25
Vehicle Detector Loop
Installation
Traffic signal design is based largely on the traffic vol-
um es and the geom etrics of the intersection. M ost
busily-traveled intersections require traffic control sig-
nals w ith traffic-sensing detectors. Presently, the
m ost com m on vehicle detector is the inductive loop
detector.
(26)
These detectors install into saw cuts in
the pavem ent surface, or either cast into the concrete
or fasten to the grade in preform ed loops.
Vehicle-detector loops that install into saw cuts can
last for m any years after proper installation. A 6-m m
(0.25-in.) w ide saw cut to a depth of 50 m m (2 in.) is
necessary to recess the detector below the pavem ent
surface. Figure 9A show s three com m on configura-
tions. After saw ing, detector system m anufacturers
recom m end flushing the saw cuts w ith w ater to
rem ove saw slurry, then using com pressed air to
rem ove debris that m ay puncture the w ire insulation.
R ounding the corners of diagonal or rectangular loops
w ith additional saw cuts or 18-m m (0.75-in.) diam eter
core holes w ill ease insertion of the detector w ire and
allow the w ire to rem ain m ore flexible, preventing rup-
ture.
D etector system m anufacturers
(26)
recom m end
installing 16 AW G stranded w ire w ith a coating suit-
able for the sealant. An outer jacket of 1.25 m m
(0.050 in.) polyester w ire insulation w ith an additional
0.8 m m (0.032 in.) of polyester coating provides pro-
tection from m elting to 204C (400F), and is suitable
for hot-applied sealants. C old-applied sealants and
epoxies that are specifically form ulated for installing
loop detectors also are readily available.
The detector w ire should be flexible enough to give
w ith pavem ent m ovem ent, but provide enough ten-
sion to rem ain in the bottom of the saw cut. A backer
rod placed above the w ires is recom m ended by
detector system m anufacturers to ensure the w ires
rem ain in place.
Preform ed loops can be cast into concrete and do
not require saw ing. In a preform ed loop, PVC pipe
encapsulates the detector w ires for protection and
provides rigidity to the loop during installation. The
loops m ust be fastened securely into position before
paving at a m inim um of 50 m m (2 in.) above any rein-
forcing steel. If the slab contains w elded w ire fabric
or bar m ats, the pipes should not align w ith the rein-
forcem ent grid (Figure 10). Any reinforcing steel that
aligns w ith the pipes w ill interfere w ith the inductive
loop.
The detector w ires often break near the conduit that
brings them to a signal handhold or the signal con-
troller cabinet. To avoid breakage, it is advantageous
to core drill this location to provide a larger recess
(Figure 9B ).
Figure 9. Vehicle detector loop configurations.
Figure 10. Aligning preformed vehicle loop detectors
above reinforcing steel.
26
Concrete-to-Asphalt Transition
The transition betw een a concrete pavem ent intersec-
tion and an asphalt pavem ent can be troublesom e if
poorly designed. Figure 11 show s four transition
details for different concrete pavem ents. D etails A, B
and C account for im pact loads on the transition slab
w ith extra thickness (D etails A and B are for concrete
overlays of existing asphalt pavem ent).
D etail D show s an im pact slab and is m eant for pave-
m ents that frequently carry heavy trucks and are
thicker than 175 m m (7 in.). The im pact slab protects
the asphalt pavem ent from deform ation by providing
additional support at the transition. C ontractors can
easily create the lip in the im pact slab using a false
form header.
O ne w ay to keep the slabs near the transition from
m igrating on granular subbases is to place deform ed
tiebars in the first three transverse contraction joints.
The tiebars w ill hold the slabs tightly together. Slab
m igration is not an issue w hen w hitetopping, as the
concrete w ill bond to the asphalt surface.
Adding Lanes to Existing
Concrete Pavement
Som e intersection im provem ents require additional
concrete lanes next to existing concrete pavem ent or
curb and gutter. For these im provem ents it is essen-
tial to place transverse contraction joints (Type A-1 or
A-2, Fig. 2) to m atch any existing joints or cracks in
the existing pavem ent (Figure 12). W ithout a contrac-
tion joint, m ovem ent of the old concrete pavem ent
m ay cause a sym pathy crack in the new lanes.
An alternative m ethod to avoid sym pathy cracking is
to place an isolation joint w ith a separating m edium
(Type D -4, Fig. 2) betw een the edge of the existing
pavem ent, or curb and gutter, and the new lane.
Figure 12. Aligning joints for adding auxiliary turn lanes
to existing J RCP concrete pavements.
Concrete to Asphalt Transition Details
Figure 11. Transition details for concrete pavement to
asphalt pavement.
27
References
1. D rivew ay and Street Intersection Spacing,
Transportation Research Circular, N o. 456,
Transportation R esearch B oard, N ational R esearch
C ouncil, W ashington, D C , M arch 1996.
2. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,
Am erican Association of State H ighw ay and
Transportation O fficials, W ashington, D C , 1994.
3. Design of Concrete Pavements for City Streets, IS184P,
Am erican C oncrete Pavem ent Association, Arlington
H eights, IL, 1992.
4. Guide for the Design of Pavement Structures, Am erican
Association of State H ighw ay and Transportation
O fficials, W ashington, D C , 1993.
5. Thickness Design for Concrete Highway and Street
Pavements, EB 109P, Portland C em ent Association,
Skokie, IL, 1984.
6. Design and Construction of J oints for Concrete
Highways, TB 010P, Am erican C oncrete Pavem ent
Association, Arlington H eights, IL, 1991.
7. Design and Construction of J oints in Concrete Streets,
IS061P, Am erican C oncrete Pavem ent Association,
Arlington H eights, IL, 1992.
8. J oint and Crack Sealing and Repair for Concrete
Pavements, TB 012P, Am erican C oncrete Pavem ent
Association, Arlington H eights, IL, 1993.
9. Sm ith, K.D ., and others, Perform ance of C oncrete
Pavem ents, Evaluation of In-Service C oncrete
Pavem ents,Volume 1 - Final Report, D TFH -61-91-C -
00053, Federal H ighw ay Adm inistration, W ashington,
D C , April 1995.
10. Intersection J oint Layout, IS006P, Am erican C oncrete
Pavem ent Association, Skokie, IL, 1996.
11. Panarese, B ., Kosm atka, S., D esign and C ontrol of
C oncrete M ixtures,13th Edition, EB 001TC , Portland
C em ent Association, Skokie, IL, 1994.
12. Guide Specification for Concrete Subject to Alkali-Silica
Reactions, IS415TC , Portland C em ent Association and
Am erican C oncrete Pavem ent Association, Skokie, IL,
1995.
13. Diagnosis and Control of Alkali-Aggregate Reactions in
Concrete, 1st Edition, IS413TC , Portland C em ent
Association and Am erican C oncrete Pavem ent
Association and N ational R eady M ixed C oncrete
Association and N ational Aggregates Association,
Skokie, IL 1997.
14. Fast-Track Concrete Pavements, TB 004.02P, Am erican
C oncrete Pavem ent Association, Skokie, IL, 1994.
15. Accelerated Rigid Paving Techniques: State-of-the-Art
Report (Special Project 201), FH W A-SA-94-080,
Federal H ighw ay Adm inistration, W ashington, D C ,
D ecem ber 1994.
16. Whitetopping - State of the Practice, EB 210P, Am erican
C oncrete Pavem ent Association, Skokie, IL, 1997.
17. G rove, J., and others, B ond C ontribution to
W hitetopping Perform ance on Low Volum e R oads,
Transportation Research Record 1382, Transportation
R esearch B oard, N ational R esearch C ouncil,
W ashington, D C , 1993, pp. 104-110.
18. Guide Specifications for Highway Construction,
Am erican Association of State H ighw ay and
Transportation O fficials, W ashington, D C , 1993.
19. Construction of Portland Cement Concrete Pavements
Participants Manual, FH W A H I-96-027, N ational
H ighw ay Institute, Federal H ighw ay Adm inistration,
W ashington, D C , 1996.
20. The 1996 Public W orks M anual,Public Works, Vol.
127. N o. 5, Public W orks Journal C orporation,
R idgew ood, N J, April 15, 1996.
21. Constructing Smooth Concrete Pavements, TB 006P,
Am erican C oncrete Pavem ent Association, Arlington
H eights, IL, 1990.
22. H ibbs, B ., Larson, R ., Tire Pavem ent N oise and Safety
Perform ance,PCC Surface Texture Technical Working
Group, FH W A-SA-96-068, Federal H ighw ay
Adm inistration, W ashington, D C , M ay 1996.
23. Zollinger, D ., and others, Saw cut D epth C onsiderations
for Jointed C oncrete Pavem ent B ased on Fracture
M echanics Analysis,Transportation Research Record
1449, Transportation R esearch B oard, N ational
R esearch C ouncil, W ashington, D C , 1995, pp. 91-100.
24. O kam oto, P., and others, G uidelines for Tim ing Joint
Saw ing and Earliest Loading for C oncrete Pavem ent,
Volume 1 - Final Report, FH W A-R D -91-079, Federal
H ighw ay Adm inistration, W ashington, D C , February
1994.
25. H igh Strength C oncrete,ACI Manual of Concrete
Practice, Part 1, Materials and General Properties of
Concrete, AC I 363R -84, Am erican C oncrete Institute,
D etroit, M I, 1990.
26. Loop Installation,Detector Systems Technical Notes,
D etector System s, Inc., Stanton, C A, 1990.
This publication is based on the facts, tests, and authorities stated herein. It is intended for the use of professional personnel competent to
evaluate the significance and limitations of the reported findings and who will accept responsibility for the application of the material it con-
tains. Obviously, the American Concrete Pavement Association disclaims any and all responsibility for application of the stated principles or
for the accuracy of any of the sources other than work performed or information developed by the Association.
5420 Old Orchard Road, Suite A100, Skokie, Illinois, 60077-1059
(847) 966-2272
American Concrete Pavement Association, 1997 TB019P
ASTM ASTM Title CSA/CAN
Designation Equivalent or
Specified Test
Equivalent Canadian Standards
ASTM C 33 Standard Specification for C oncrete Aggregate A23.1
ASTM C 39 Test M ethod for C om pressive Strength of C ylindrical A23.2-9C
C oncrete Specim ens
ASTM C 78 Test M ethod for Flexural Strength of C oncrete (U sing Sim ple A23.2-8C
B eam w ith Third-Point Loading)
ASTM C 109 Test M ethod for C om pressive Strength of H ydraulic C em ent M ortar A5
ASTM C 150 Standard Specification for Portland C em ent A5
ASTM C 260 Standard Specification for Air-Entraining Adm ixtures for C oncrete ASTM C 260
ASTM C 309 Standard Specification for Liquid M em brane-Form ing C om pounds ASTM C 309
for C uring C oncrete
ASTM C 494 Standard Specification for C hem ical Adm ixtures for C oncrete ASTM C 494
ASTM C 597 Test M ethod for Pulse Velocity through C oncrete A23.2-24C
ASTM C 618 Standard Specification for Fly Ash and R aw or C alcined N atural A23.5
Pozzolan for use as a M ineral Adm ixture in Portland
C em ent C oncrete
ASTM D 698 Laboratory C om paction C haracteristics of Soil U sing Standard Effort ASTM D 698
ASTM C 803 Test M ethod for Penetration R esistance of H ardened C oncrete ASTM C 803
ASTM C 805 Test M ethod for R ebound N um ber of H ardened C oncrete ASTM C 805
ASTM C 900 Test M ethod for Pullout Strength of H ardened C oncrete ASTM C 900
ASTM C 1017 Standard Specification for C hem ical Adm ixtures for Producing ASTM C 1017
Flow ing C oncrete
ASTM C 1074 Practice for Estim ating C oncrete Strength by the M aturity N um ber ASTM C 1074
ASTM C 1150 Standard Test M ethod for the B reak-O ff N um ber of ASTM C 1150
H ardened C oncrete
ASTM D 4791 Test for Flat or Elongated Particles in C oarse Aggregate C R D -C 119