President and Chief Executive Officer California Institute for Regenerative Medicine
September 10, 2014
Topics Staying FOCUSED on the MISSION Budget Commentary CIRM 2.0 !"#$%#&' ) !"#"$ *+,- .,$$ )',&./ Our Mission %&&"'"$()*+ -."/ &"'' .$"(./"*.- .0 1()"*.- 23.4 5*/". /"63&(' *""6-7 It is all about the patients. The Four Part Test Will it speed up the development of a stem cell treatment? Will it increase the likelihood of success? Will it meet an unmet medical need? Is it efficient? BUDGET REVIEW Two Separate Funds $180M Administrative Budget $2.75B Award Budget Grants Administration Budget $180M Administrative Cost $89 million spent $91 million remaining Current spending rate is about $13 million per year Funded until 2021 at current spend rate Award Budget $2.75B Award Budget $1.9 B awarded (not all spent) Estimated $50-100M of the $1.9B awarded will be recovered $880M not awarded Leaves approximately $1B available to award Sufficient funding at current rate until 2020 Key Issues All the Kings Horses Spending money faster does not necessarily speed up the development process A Penny Saved? Our goal is not to save money it is to find cures Quality Matters Uncertain CIRM will be able to maintain a $190 million annual award rate with our current pipeline we need more high quality projects
CIRM 2.0 !"#$%#&' ) !"#"$ *+,- .,$$ )',&./ CIRM 2.0: Purpose 80 &$"(." ( 1$0&"-- (. 9:;< =0$ (#$(&)*+> (2($63*+ (*6 (6/3*3-."$3*+ +$(*.- .4(. !"#"$ -"$?"- 05$ /3--30* If successful, this should lead to: More high quality applications Reduced cycle time Accelerated progression of funded projects Clarity The Overall Process Application Contracting Administration Review Example process for clinical stage projects The Overall Process Application Contracting Administration Review Concept plan approval, RFA generation, LOI review, and application submission. The Overall Process Application Contracting Administration Review Includes eligibility evaluation, COI checks, GWG review and Board approval. The Overall Process Application Contracting Administration Review Budget reconciliation, plan amendments, milestone and financial term agreement. The Overall Process Application Contracting Administration Review Disbursement, progress reporting, CDAP, and milestone evaluation. The Overall Process Application Contracting Administration Review 9-15 months The Overall Process Application Contracting Administration Review 9-15 months 5-7 months The Overall Process Application Contracting Administration Review 9-15 months 5-7 months 5-7 months The Overall Process Application Contracting Administration Review 9-15 months 5-7 months 5-7 months Overall Cycle Time 19-29 months The Overall Process Application Contracting Administration Review 9-15 months 5-7 months 5-7 months Overall Cycle Time 19-29 months 4 years Significant Opportunities Timing ! More frequent calls ! Shorter review time Structure ! Agreements that better motivate the behavior we want ! Clear success criteria Accelerating Activities ! More frequent interaction where we can help (FDA, BD, etc.) ! Seamless transitions CIRM 2.0 Rollout Plan Now October Continue to meet with stakeholders Refine working ideas Meet with the Scientific Subcommittee October Board Meeting Present concept plan to the Board December Board Meeting Adopt necessary policy and procedure modifications January 1 st Launch first phase Thank you! C. Randal Mills, Ph.D. President and Chief Executive Officer California Institute for Regenerative Medicine
Myofascial Trigger Points - Pathophysiology and Evidence-Informed Diagnosis and Management (Contemporary Issues in Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Medicine) (PDFDrive)